House Impeachment Hearings – Day Three – 9:00am Vindman and Williams / 2:30pm Volker and Morrison – Livestream Links…

Today the House Impeachment Committee (HPSCI) begins day three of public hearings toward their goal of removing U.S. President Donald J Trump from office.

The first hearing begins at 9 a.m ET with Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the Ukraine usurper on the National Security Council who leaked to Eric Ciaramella for the construction of a fraudulent ‘whistle-blower’ complaint; and Jennifer Williams, the executive usurper/aide to Vice President Mike Pence.  Both were on the phone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky.

Then at 2:30pm ET Kurt D. Volker, the former United States special envoy to Ukraine, and Timothy Morrison, a Europe and Russia expert for the NatSec Council will testify.

CSPAN Livestream LinkPBS Livestream LinkFox News Livestream Link

.

.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,278 Responses to House Impeachment Hearings – Day Three – 9:00am Vindman and Williams / 2:30pm Volker and Morrison – Livestream Links…

  1. Tashs Office says:

    Col. Slanders wears his uniform as a costume. Very sad.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • TarsTarkas says:

      He didn’t need to prepare. This is all to satisfy the legalities of predetermined impeachment. Sorry for sounding like a broken record.

      Like

  3. Deplore Able says:

    Is it just me or is this all just boring?
    99.5% of the American people will not be able to follow this.

    Like

  4. KAG says:

    Parsing words….. Zelensky brought up corruption, so PDJT didn’t have to. It’s obvious that counsel knows the answers before asking the questions and witnesses know which questions are coming and in what order…. All scripted. 2nd careers for these witnesses are dependent upon their participation with this sham!

    Like

  5. booger71 says:

    Barry..Gave Ukraine blankets
    President Trump gave them rockets
    ?
    Which President gave the most security to Ukraine?

    Liked by 3 people

    • pawatcher says:

      Barry gave them a coup via the CIA/State Dept. in 2014 with 10,000 killed: then he sent the blankets to the new president he helped get in office. The corruption could proceed un hampered.
      In 5 years Trump witnessed (along with US) the election of a new president in the Ukraine that promised to investigate and end corruption for his people. He is a comedienne by trade, but he wasn’t kidding. Like Trump and Reagan he puts the people of the Ukraine first.

      Like

  6. Minuteman says:

    This Impeachment Carnival Show isn’t about protecting Biden. Or even Clinton. Nor Obama. It’s about protecting the workings of a State Department that has been turned into a cash cow for the Globalist La Cosa Nostra.

    The State Department is even more corrupt than the DOJ, because the DOJ doesn’t have the bags of billions of dollars that State does that go into the payoffs, vote buying and skimming.

    Liked by 12 people

    • Mike Robinson says:

      The show is to protect, among others: Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler.

      Until 2016, they could all commit high crimes with impunity, knowing that the POTUS always had their backs.

      Until … 2016 …

      And then(!), the Ukrainians elected a comedian who was no joker … 😱

      Liked by 4 people

    • pawatcher says:

      Money laundering is the stock in trade of all bureaucracies: sad but true and it always involves “wars”; war on drugs, war for democracy, war on poverty, war on terror, etc.
      Remember government can not finance anything or give foreign aid; that’s all up to the tax payers……….Reagan, Palin and Trump are the only true representatives we’ve had in a century.

      Like

  7. bullnuke says:

    Williams doesn’t know anything about Ukraine corruption. “I was not aware” her answer to all questions.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. jus wundrin says:

    When it comes to the repubs turn, please, ANY repub, ask viney: “What was your relationship with eric ciaramella?”

    JUST DO IT!!!!!!

    Liked by 5 people

  9. Patience says:

    Williams is certainly worthy of Ukraine being in her portfolio. (eye roll)
    >Didn’t know about Burisma…. & Bidens until WHEN?

    Liked by 2 people

  10. gabytango says:

    This chick thinks she is just soooooo smarrrrrt! (roll eyes!) Tunes is doing a fabulous job showing how much she DOES NOT know!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Niagara Frontier says:

    “I was not aware of…..” WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! From both of these witnesses.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. fred5678 says:

    Ms. Williams not aware of much about topics in her portfolio before 2019 and Schiff prepping sessions. Weak sauce.

    Liked by 4 people

  13. bullnuke says:

    Both wear blinders to Democrat and Ukraine corruption.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. Justin Green says:

    Vindman, to be a Ukraine specialist, is either a liar or should be fired for complete and total incompetence.

    Jennifer Williams is apparently clueless as well.

    Liked by 10 people

  15. Reserved55 says:

    Neither Kernel know anything.

    Like

  16. Patience says:

    Nunes ROCKS !!!!!!!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  17. sDee says:

    These Ukrainian experts know everything about Ukraine, until they know nothing.

    Liked by 9 people

  18. bullnuke says:

    Please go there, Nunes!!

    Liked by 1 person

  19. fixintostand says:

    Wow for being the most important witness’s these two sure do not know. and are not aware of much regarding Burisma. Coaching much?? Hoping Mr. Nunes brings the hammer down on their ignorance over certain topics.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. fred5678 says:

    Scott Adams (probably is saying): Vindman has been watching the other movie. Totally unaware of any Democrat corruption.

    Like

  21. LouisianaTeaRose says:

    Nunes just slaughtered these rwo. It’s embarrassing.

    THIS IS OVER.

    Liked by 6 people

    • LouisianaTeaRose says:

      TWO

      Like

      • TarsTarkas says:

        Democrats will simply say that Vindman’s and Wliliams’ testimony corroborates Taylor’s and Kent’s and Ambassador Y’s testimony about the depth and breadth of Trump’s malfeasance, corruption, extortion, and bribery. And proceed to impeachment vote. You should see the MSM headlines. They’re not just watching different moves. We’re watching a movie and they’re watching a fiddler’s convention.

        Like

  22. mark says:

    I pray that Juliani and Nunes have info that will show that these 2 lied about what they knew and when they knew it. Hence Nunes opening questions.

    Liked by 5 people

  23. All Hype says:

    Can you imagine Vinny getting cross examined by Rudy Giuliani? This dough boy better start getting in shape and hardened or Mr. Giuliani is going to absolutely destroy him!

    Like

  24. jeans2nd says:

    File in memory for future reference – Williams was at the London Embassy during Crossfire Hurricane or the run-up to Crossfire Hurricane

    Liked by 7 people

    • mark says:

      Exactly J2. These 2 along with yovanovitch and taylor are low hanging fruit. They would easily turn on their coup conspiritors in a NY min.. Where’s or justice dept.?

      Like

  25. dufrst says:

    He should have pleaded the 5th

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Justin Green says:

    Vindman is LYING LYING LYING.

    Liked by 8 people

  27. fred5678 says:

    Vinnie all of a sudden DODGING key leak question 3 times in a row.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Patience says:

    Nunes’ question (repeated), “DO YOU KNOW…” must be a nail for Vindman’s coffin.
    and
    “Did you discuss…. with ANY individual not in the White House” is yet another nail.

    Liked by 7 people

  29. Reserved55 says:

    US “interagency” policy.

    Like

  30. bullnuke says:

    Shifty!! Protect a whistleblower he doesn’t know

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Patience says:

    Schiff interrupts Nunes.
    >Ouch! Getting too close; eh?

    Whistle(blower) while you work

    Liked by 4 people

  32. Justin Green says:

    BOOM….. Schiff just blew his whole hand.

    Liked by 4 people

  33. burnett044 says:

    herte comes Shiff head protecting WB

    Liked by 1 person

  34. gabytango says:

    Schiff leading and intimidating the witness!

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Ken Maritch says:

    Schiff coaching Vindeman from the bench.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. jeans2nd says:

    Total insubordination – correcting an elected official – Vindman
    Never seen anything like this.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. Justin Green says:

    Vindman is lying lying lying….

    Nunes is making Vindman look like a bumbling moron.

    Liked by 10 people

  38. bullnuke says:

    Vindman needs to plead the 5th

    Like

  39. 1stgoblyn says:

    Nunes just caught Schiff and Vindman re outing the Whistleblower.

    Liked by 7 people

  40. Reserved55 says:

    “Right to anonymity” BS

    Liked by 2 people

    • Somebody says:

      They need to nail Schiff to the wall on that statement and ask him to cite exactly where in the statute it says a WB has the right to anonymity. If he answers he’ll cite the part about the IG, then follow up outside of the IG provision please direct us to where it is cited.

      Liked by 2 people

    • dimbulbz says:

      Please ask: Under what statute does a whistleblower have a right to anonymity?

      Like

  41. thedoc00 says:

    In WWII, the Soviet and German Armies had units for guys like this called Penal Battalions. They were always assigned to the instant death jobs and this guy deserves to be point man in such a unit.

    The Army said he could testify without fear of retribution, which is a correct and prudent statement given all the assurances of protection (no matter how questionable) by congress in the deposition. However, there is a big difference between protection to testify and actually committing as well as admitting to crimes while giving testimony. Just as in civilian courts, immunity and legal protections DO NOT protect one from crimes committed while acting under that protection nor if there were crimes committed that are not covered by the protection to TESTIFY. To those upset the DoD has not yet acted on this guy, the proof will come when LTC Vindman is used up by the Democrats and hung out to dry. If no actions are taken, then its time pull out the pitchforks to demand answers to why he is not punished.

    He has admitted to and committed several crimes punishable under UCMJ, prior to and while acting under his cloud of protection. Those crimes can be prosecuted as the protections give him NO cover.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Mike Robinson says:

      For now, just let him talk. Just let him keep committing crimes. Let him keep incriminating other people. We can Court-Martial him at our leisure.

      The Commander-in-Chief has absolute authority to deal with him when and as he pleases. But he does not have to do so today.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mikeyboo says:

      If forced, Democrats will doubtless claim that Vindman misled them. He is a perfect scapegoat.

      Like

  42. willthesuevi says:

    I wonder how long before Vindman pulls a Snowden and books it across the pond while throwing his US Passport back over his left shoulder?

    Traitorous bastard.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. bullnuke says:

    Of course they know who the whistleblower is. Should have asked if Vindman ever spoke to Eric C.

    Liked by 3 people

  44. gabytango says:

    This Republican Counsel reminds me of Columbo. Hope he is as smart.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. sundance says:

    Liked by 17 people

  46. Eaglemom says:

    Boom!! Nunes got VIndeman!!!! He reported call to “intelligence agency” official….won’t say which agency! Schiff jumps in. Jim Jordan is going to destroy him on cross examination.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Somebody says:

      He started to say the office of something before Schiff jumped in. Where exactly is the WB assigned is it an office of something? How about asking him if he interacts with that office as part of his duties, maybe list it in a litany of places he interacts with.

      On another note, why is the agency sacrosanct? Nunes was simply asking what agency.

      Bottom line via Nunes’ questioning and Schiff’s jumping in Vindman is without a doubt the source for the WB.

      Liked by 3 people

  47. gsonFIT says:

    Vindman needs to define appropriate

    Liked by 2 people

  48. fred5678 says:

    Truth is easy to remember.

    Lies require your lawyer to ask for a page citation.

    Liked by 3 people

  49. Patience says:

    ….”The CODE word SERVER; You had access to it” ~counsel to Vindman
    Vindman: Yes.

    Liked by 4 people

  50. Brant says:

    Wow, and these are the democrat/lawfare counsel questions? It seems folks speak truth when under oath to prevent perjury. What happens when Reps get ahold of him?

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s