Pelosi Gaslighting Continues – False Claims: Administration “defying lawful subpoenas & document requests”…

Nancy Pelosi continues to mislead her ‘impeachment’ constituents.  Unfortunately the compliant media is refusing to hold her accountable.  House Democrat leadership has taken a climate assessment of democrat House members and Speaker Pelosi announced they will not hold a House impeachment authorization vote.   As a direct and specific consequence all committee subpoenas do not carry a penalty for non-compliance.


“Lawful subpoenas”, literally require an enforcement mechanism; that’s the “poena” part of the word.  The enforcement mechanism is a judicial penalty, and that penalty can only be created if the House votes to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

Absent a vote to authorize, the Legislative Branch has not established compulsion authority (aka judicial enforcement authority), as they attempt to work through their quasi-constitutional “impeachment inquiry” process.

Instead of subpoenas, Adam Schiff (House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence); and Chairman Eliot L. Engel (House Committee on Foreign Affairs) can only send out request letters. The compliance is discretionary based on the outlook of the recipient.

It is likely, highly likely, Nancy Pelosi does not have the votes to proceed with a full House impeachment authorization; so Pelosi, Schiff, Engel and Cummings have to rely on the duplicity of the media to help them hide their scheme. So far the media is complying.

Speaker Pelosi & Lawfare’s impeachment scheme can only succeed with a compliant media protecting it.  So far the media has been entirely compliant in not explaining the fraudulent basis for the construct.  If the media would ask questions the fraud would collapse.

Adam Schiff has to hide his hearings because the foundation of the impeachment fraud is to create a public impression.  There is no structural impeachment process or guideline being followed.  The committee leadership are using the closed door hearings to leak information to the media to create the needed narrative.

A legislative “letter” or demand request needs to carry judicial enforcement authority –A PENALTY– in order to be a “subpoena”.

There is no penalty that can be associated with these demands because the Legislative Branch has not established compulsion authority (aka judicial enforcement authority), as they attempt to work through their non-constitutional “impeachment inquiry” process.

It has long been well established by SCOTUS that Congress has lawful (judicial authority) subpoena powers pursuant to its implied responsibility of legislative oversight.  However, that only applies to the powers enumerated in A1§8. Neither foreign policy (Ukraine) nor impeachment have any nexus to A1§8.  The customary Legislative Branch subpoena power is limited to their legislative purpose. 

There is an elevated level of subpoena, made power possible by SCOTUS precedent, that carries inherent penalties for non-compliance, and is specifically allowed for impeachment investigations.  That level of elevated House authority requires a full House authorization vote.

In this current example the Legislative Branch is expressing their “impeachment authority” as part of the Legislative Branch purpose.  So that raises the issue of an entirely different type of subpoena:… A demand from congress that penetrates the constitutional separation of powers; and further penetrates the legal authority of Executive Branch executive privilege.

It was separately established by SCOTUS during the Nixon impeachment investigation that *IF* the full House votes to have the Judiciary Committee commence an impeachment investigation, then the Judiciary Committee has subpoena power that can overcome executive privilege claims. 

There has been NO VOTE to create that level of subpoena power.

As a consequence, the House has not created a process to penetrate the constitutionally inherent separation of powers, and/or, the legally recognized firewall known as ‘executive privilege’.   The House must vote to authorize the committee impeachment investigation, and through that process the committee gains judicial enforcement authority.  This creates the penalty for non-compliance with an impeachment subpoena.

A demand letter only becomes a “subpoena”, technically meaning: ‘a request for the production of documents with a penalty for non-compliance’, when the committee has judicial enforcement authority. That process establishes an enforcement penalty.

The current demand letters cannot carry a penalty because the demands do not contain judicial enforcement authority…. because the impeachment investigation was not authorized by the chamber.

The reason judicial enforcement authority is constitutionally required is because creating Judicial enforcement authority, creating the penalty for non-compliance, gives the Executive Branch a process to appeal any legislative demand via the Judicial Branch (federal courts).

Absent a penalty for non-compliance, which factually makes a subpoena a ‘subpoena’, the Executive Branch has no process to engage an appellate review by federal courts. This is the purposeful trick within the Pelosi/Lawfare road-map.

Pelosi and Lawfare’s plans are designed for public consumption; she/they are creating the illusion of something that doesn’t exist.  The purpose of all this fraudulent impeachment activity is to create support for an actual impeachment process.

Because the current Lawfare/Pelosi roadmap intends to work around judicial enforcement authority, the impeachment process is destined by design to end up running head-first into a constitutional problem; specifically separation of power and executive privilege. That predictable constitutional issue will end up with arguments to The Supreme Court.

THAT appears to be why Democrats and left-wing activists have been working for months to de-legitimize the Supreme Court. They always intended to run into this problem. They planned for it.

The Lawfare impeachment road-map is designed to conflict with the constitution. It is a necessary -and unavoidable- feature of their impeachment plan, not a flaw.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her Lawfare allies can change House rules (they did). Pelosi and Lawfare can also change House impeachment rules (they did). Pelosi/Lawfare can change committee rules (they did); and in doing so they can remove House republicans from the entire process… Which They Did.  However, what Lawfare and Pelosi cannot change is The U.S. Constitution, which they are destined to collide with.

Speaker Pelosi’s ‘Lawfare House rules‘ and/or ‘Lawfare impeachment rules‘ cannot supersede the constitutional separation of powers.  She is well aware of this.  Nancy Pelosi cannot decree an “official impeachment inquiry”, and as a consequence nullify a constitutional firewall between the Legislative Branch and Executive Branch.

Pelosi’s impeachment scheme requires a compliant media to support her construct.  So far, they have.


This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, propaganda, Supreme Court, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

137 Responses to Pelosi Gaslighting Continues – False Claims: Administration “defying lawful subpoenas & document requests”…

  1. AnotherView says:

    Democrats–the party of deception

    Liked by 7 people

  2. susanphd says:

    Does anyone know Pelosi’s role in the crossfire hurricane? She was a member of the gang of eight. Is she culpable for authorizing a fake counterintelligence investigation as a member of the “gang.” Would there be repercussions for Pelosi (and other gang of 8 members) if Durham finds no valid “predicate? She seems to be panicking and I wonder why.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Reserved55 says:

      These names should sound familiar.


    • Reserved55 says:

      More names.


    • jeans2nd says:

      susan – All counterintelligence inquiries are run for the benefit of the President. The President and/or the President’s NSC Adviser must – MUST – authorize running a counterintelligence investigation on a U.S. person.
      Counterintelligence operations are run for no other reason than for the President.

      The President was Barack Obama. The NSC Advisor was Susan Rice.
      Info from Lt Col (Ret) Tony Shaffer, CIA-trained Army Intel Officer, currently President of the London Center for Policy Research.

      John Brennan briefed the Gof8 members August 2016.
      They knew. They all knew.
      They also all knew about CIA’s torture programs, and many many other things. Congress/Gof8 have been lying to us for decades.

      Liked by 3 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      IMO, Pelosi and her Cohorts are at the tip of the Save Obama’s Ass spear.

      Sundance has outlined the depth of the surveillance abuse from the very top of the Power Pyramid, and that goes back more than just the past three years. Brennan was just the right man for the job. Even Lindsey admitted a few years back… yeah, looks like I was spied on.

      Liked by 3 people

    • dd_sc says:

      If any of the Gang of 8 for oversight knew the counterintelligence operation was false and actually a seditious conspiracy against Trump, they would be co-conspirators in the cover up.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Raptors2020 says:

        Rush thinks this is the Democrats’ election platform; not impeachment, but talk of impeachment, all through 2020.

        This may well please the big Democrat donors – the Hollywood dips have been driven mad by Trump- but Nancy doesn’t recognize the Republican voters will turn out in droves to protect their President. The few Republicans Pelosi deigns to speak to are GOPe and she’s, luckily for us, getting a very false picture.

        Liked by 1 person

    • rayvandune says:

      Elementary, my dear Watson! Now let’s look at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence…


  3. JoeMeek says:

    We don’t need no stinking badges!
    – High Queen and Executioner Nancy Pelosi

    Liked by 1 person

    • chipin8511 says:

      Its the Queen of England and the privy council and Pilgrim society bilderberg CFR illuminati all involved remember trillions at stake..


  4. theresanne says:

    Now Pelosi thinks she’s President. What’s up with these insane democrat women?
    Time for an intervention, or better yet, an arrest for treason.

    Liked by 12 people

      • glissmeister says:

        “Seditious Conspiracy”
        Have we been watching it in real time? The House Democrats in failing to adhere to legitimate process and seek and secure a lawful vote on their investigation may have collectively left themselves wide open to allegations of seditious conspiracy in their apparent suspension of due process, betrayal of duty and syndicate racketeering to bring down a duly elected POTUS.

        I suspect “Sedition” may soon become the word of the day.

        And Pelosi? Doesn’t she look like a woman who has realized her husband might be doing things with the benefits of her influence that could get a less protected insider locked up?

        My hunch is their protected status ain’t what it used to be.

        Liked by 2 people

    • gunrunner03 says:

      How in the hell are they flying there? On USAF aircraft? Easy fix, order DoD to no longer fly members of Congress.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Will says:

      I don’t understand how she and Schiff are allowed to conduct US foreign policy by meeting with the King of Jordan, etc. Sundance can you explain why Trump is allowing this? Violation of the Logan Act?

      Liked by 8 people

      • fractionalexponent says:

        Wasn’t McCain photographed meeting with “moderate” terrorists in Syria?

        Maybe Pelosi is going there to try to rebuild ISIS to try to torpedo Trump’s goal of bringing troops home.

        Hope somebody photographs and identifies who she visits.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Zy says:

        I’m so ignorant I thought the State Department runs foreign policy.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Allard Otten says:

      McCarthy says in the interview with Maria B that Pelosi never read the letter to Erdogan that all persons in the Cabinet Room meeting had been given. McCarthy said she turned the letter upside down, made it obvious she was not going to read it or participate in the meeting about it, then left the meeting along with Schumer as if on cue and as if the whole spiel had been contrived beforehand.

      Now this Pelosi led codel to Jordan hits the papers. I would say that there is something in the Erdogan letter that Pelosi did not want to acknowledge knowing about, because whatever she’s doing in Jordan is meant to be counter-productive to that letter. Knowingly is the operative word when engaging in seditious activity.

      POTUS’s tweet may indicate she walked into a trap.

      Liked by 2 people

    • beaujest says:

      Her last trip to Venice was for a face lift !


  5. E.P. says:

    To summarize: Subpoenas issued as part of an unConstitutional process cannot themselves be lawful. Q.E.D., the comments and leaks made by Pelosi and her cohorts are fraudulent and therefore unalwful, making Pelosi and her cohorts in crime – in a word – criminals.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. The Boss says:

    The president is 100% correct. Nancy is not well.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. JoeMeek says:

    Nancy Pelsoi to the House Speakership, parley-voo?
    Nancy Pelsoi to the House Speakership, parley-voo?

    She has a hateful temper and spews such a crock
    On her insanity has a full head lock
    She can bag tens of millions by cutting many an underhanded deal
    But it sure isn’t because of even a scintilla of human appeal
    She has so many delusions it would make Freud’s knees knock
    And her mumbling cackle could stop a cuckoo clock

    She has the form like the back of a twisted hack
    When she cries for any but herself the crocodile tears run down her back
    If she would just change her Depends underwear
    Her MSM frogs would award her the Croix-de-Guerre
    She wants only herself and her cronies to get the pie and cake
    And American men and women to just get another bellyache
    You might forget her “I’ll give you a dollar for the Wall”” yell
    But you will never forget the House Speaker hell

    Hinky, dinky, parley-voo


  8. California Joe says:

    In fact the House of Representatives full membership voted AGAINST impeachment three times! So, obviously there is no legitimate impeachment proceeding.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Johnny says:

      Exactly. Pelosi is operating outside her legal powers of the legislature. She is attempting to overthrow a duly elected President of the United States.

      In other parts of world they call it a coup attempt. Pelosi should be arrested for SEDITIOUS ACTS. Pelosi has zero authority for her investigation.

      Until House votes Pelosi has zero authority to demand anything.

      Liked by 6 people

      • So now it looks like she’s trying to create a “clean-up on aisle 3” scenario to rush to Jordan to enlist an ally of our President? Why is her ‘entourage’ playing Obama Apology Tour when an apparent solution has been reached by our president and others? So there is no mess on aisle 3. Perhaps, if none, she wants to create one. “Clean-up on aisle 4”!


    • jrapdx says:

      Not only that. As the House voted NOT to impeach, wouldn’t holding an “impeachment inquiry” be in defiance of House rules? Otherwise what is the meaning of a vote of the full House? Does that vote carry no weight? It appears that’s the case and it could set a dangerous precedent tantamount to a total lack of authority, undermining many other crucial actions the House must take. It will be no surprise when challenges to future House actions arise creating numerous “Constitutional crises” until traditional order is restored.


      • jbowen82 says:

        Not necessarily. Disapproval of doing something does not mean approval of doing nothing.

        Liked by 1 person

        • jrapdx says:

          OK. So Pelosi is in fact not doing “nothing”. The something she is doing is such that we view as requiring approval that was specifically not authorized. It’s illogical to argue that failure of a vote to approve allows going ahead with action that requires approval. The only valid assertion is that the action does not actually require approval. However that assertion is yet to be tested, for example, by arguments to the SCOTUS.


  9. Some days I feel lonelier than a Nancy Pelosi “subpoena.”

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Some days I feel lonelier than a Nancy Pelosi “subpoena.”

    Liked by 1 person

  11. RAC says:

    Pelosi issues her Micky Mouse subpoenas and it’s not illegal for her to do that so she calls them lawful. Is she cynically abusing peoples credulity or has she lost her reason. Simple test pay her wages in Monopoly money and see if she complains.


  12. cboldt says:

    — Speaker Pelosi’s `Lawfare House rules` and/or `Lawfare impeachment rules` cannot supersede the constitutional separation of powers. —
    They can if some court goes along with it. None of the constitution is safe as long as the federal government gets to say “what it is.”
    “The House” is presently not abiding by the constitution, but as you point out, the press is telling the opposite narrative.
    We have routinely been shown that “the courts” aren’t bound by the constitution either – other than by their own edict that says they are.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jrapdx says:

      Yes, but will the SCOTUS go along with it? Ultimately it’s SCOTUS that determines “what the Constitution means” in real-world terms. My hunch is as it’s now populated SCOTUS wouldn’t abide Pelosi and cabal riding roughshod over Constitutional provisions for impeachment and separation of powers constructs.


      • cboldt says:

        — Yes, but will the SCOTUS go along with it? —
        Flip a coin. Depends on what they had for breakfast in these fast and loose “anything goes” times.


      • WethePeopleHandbook says:

        “Ultimately it’s SCOTUS that determines “what the Constitution means” in real-world terms.”
        I get it, in real-world terms, but we can make the distinction between real-world terms and the Constitution itself. “Real-world terms” is what got us in this mess courtesy of Charles Evans Hughes delusional mind and everyone just went along with it.

        The Constitution does not give SCOTUS the power to determine what the Constitution means.


        • jrapdx says:

          Alright, but SCOTUS has long determined how the Constitution applies in cases that have come before it and AFAICT no one is challenging SCOTUS authority to do so. IOW there are multiple theories about “the Constitution itself” in various respects. Even adherents of “originalist” views don’t always agree with each other on specific points. Hence the need for an arbiter of application in real-world terms, that is, a mechanism to resolve theory into practice.


        • ristvan says:

          Wrong. I think we have disagreed on basic conlaw stuff before. In this case, please read:
          1. A3§2.1
          2. Marbury v Madison (1803), 5US137, decided by first CJ Marshall in (as the reference shows) the fifth year of first President George Washington’s term. When the Founders were all still out and about.

          Then get back if you can cite more ‘handbook’ conlaw nonsense for me to rebut.

          Let me soften that rebuke with an explanation. WethePeopleHandbook began as an admirable effort to educate laymen about the Constitution basics. But it has since gone a bit off the rails legally. It cannot now with a straight face maintain that hundreds of years of SCOTUS jurisprudence is just wrong. Which you just did.

          BTW, IIRC in our last encounter about USMCA, you brought in cites from Blacks Law Dictionary from 1821 (although UK common law is irrelevant to US after we won the Revolutionary War —I bought a very expensive copy, read it while in law school as an extra curricular deep background common law activity, and have it still in storage) and confused the international law definition of a treaty with the US conlaw definition of a treaty. NOT the same, and in the US the US definition rules. I did not bother to respond.

          Liked by 1 person

  13. Parker Longbaugh says:

    I support the White House not complying with requests from intoxicated child molesters.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. jus wundrin says:

    This is why I refer to the MSM as the dims ministry of propaganda.

    Will people start to wake up?


  15. wascillywabbit says:

    A Game of Thrones with real consequences. We even have the dragons!


  16. wascillywabbit says:

    A Game of Thrones with real consequences. We even have the dragons!


  17. mptc says:

    Isn’t Elijah Cummings dead?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Ausonius says:

    Let’s face it: Pelosi suffers from Subpoena Envy….but Schiffty has an especially bad case of it! 😉


  19. solomonpal says:

    There is nothing to hide so why comply?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. 335blues says:

    The marxist democrat party must not just be defeated,
    they must be destroyed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jx says:

      Destroyed completely.


      • Zy says:

        and outlawed forever like the Nazi Party is in Germany.


      • Daniel M. Camac says:

        And Exorcised!! Not that I’m a Catholic Priest, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.

        But after shooting them, hanging them and burning them you just can’t leave any avenues open that they might creep back into society.

        Can you imagine all of the cold anger that we Deplorables have stored up being turned into Kinectic energy against the Left, the enemydia, the so-called DOJ, FBI and our Congress critters?

        As Bruce Orr said when he entered that stall……WHOA NELLIE!!


  21. MustangBlues says:

    Wonderful that Sundance provides this edifying and informative presentation of impeachment and its meaning within the house rules, and legitimacy as a valid congressional process.

    The lawfare bandits are rogues, true communist cultists, bent on the destruction of the American system of governance.


  22. Charlotte Powell Brooks says:

    One would think that with numerous refusals to obey the “fraudulent subpoena’s” that the masses, blinded by their own hatred, stupidity, and lack of knowledge, would be demanding legal action against all who are not complying.


    • bofh says:

      refusals to obey the “fraudulent subpoena’s

      Call ’em “FAKE subpoena’s”. The public has already learned the word “fake” from PDJT with reference to the media. Take advantage of that recognition, and at the same time, conflate the fake subpoena’s with the public’s growing suspicion and dislike of the media.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. Blase Bauer says:

    Unless I missed it, you left out an important element regarding Legislative Purpose. Each Committee, only by a majority vote of that committee, establish subpoena power and the rules for that subpoena. ONCE there is a majority vote within a particular committee, THEN and only then can the subpoena be issued by a MAJORITY VOTE or the CHAIR OF A COMMITTEE by the rules can issue a subpoena, Hence the controversy surrounding Ellijah Cummings forged signature.


    • cboldt says:

      Good point. And going back to the fiull house, the full house voted to grant subject matter jurisdiction to committees. EVERYTHING goes back to whole house vote.
      None of the house rules mention impeachment. All of the house rules go to legislation and oversight. Impeachment is a separate quasi-prosecutorial power held by the whole house. Nancy is pretending to be the whole house. Cuckoo. As is the press.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The press is the major problem in that there are 50-60 million voters that do not read this site. These useful idiots only skim the headlines, then move to surf their Facebook and social media entertainment. Unfortunately, the CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and FOX headliners form their shallow opinions. Nancy may babble, Schiff may stutter, but the media owns the microphone. Loud and evil.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Daniel M. Camac says:

          mickeyhamtramck, How true!! Luckily social media also allows (sort of) a bypass to this insane one-sided reporting. I never thought I would use F-Book, Twitter or Instacrap but I opened a Twitter account in 2016 because I wanted to hear from my President-Elect and now President first hand with no media editing. I also get to follow other conservative voices and it has been the best thing I ever did. Unfortunately many folks in flyover country don’t have access but surely something is getting through because we rocked 2016 against all “odds” and we are going to ROLL 2020 like this country has never seen before, excluding a kamikaze attack by the Left that will leave them dying on scorched earth.

          It’s their nickel.


  24. pucecatt says:

    Ground the flight in Syria, let them sweat it out in the war torn area for a few weeks ..


  25. CTH Fan says:

    Sure wish we had a Justice Department that would set the record straight. This mad woman is interfering with and causing great harm to the safety and security of the US.

    No excuses..


  26. Doppler says:

    Re graphic, “Supreme Court (evaluates laws)” should be (“decides cases and controversies under the law”). Without a real dispute, there is no judicial power.


  27. Gary Lacey says:

    I saw the photo of Sander’s rally and admittedly it was a large assemblage of fools, morons and idiots.
    What drives them to be a democrat. Free heathcare, a Free obama phone,
    Free college, Free college loan forgiveness, Free medicare for all, free drugs, and a carbon tax for climate change……fools, morons and idiots, the carbon tax would nullify all the freebies.


  28. Perot Conservative says:

    WHY is Pelosi (and lackey Schiff) in Jordan? Had to have been planned weeks ago.

    Not just an excuse to then pop over to France and Italy?

    Meeting with EU /German leaders?


    • WES says:

      Perot: There is a personal financial incentive for Nancy & company to make these trips. By visiting a war zone, even for just a few minutes, they get tax relief for the full month on any income made in that month. That is why the brief planned stop in Syria or Iraq!

      You didn’t think it was for their country’s benefit did you?


    • pucecatt says:

      They keep going on vaca and overseas because they know the Horowitz report won’t be released until they are all in session .. stall tactics ..


  29. LKAinLA says:

    Imo, President Trump should have a Natl address from the Oval Office while Pelosi and crew are out of the country and ask the public to examine why. Also address this phony impeachment process and clue in a few clueless. While he is at it, call out the media for continued lies regarding the phony process. That evil crew will not see this coming and have to fly back knowing rhey have been called out.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Perot Conservative says:

      I’ve wanted him to do this for weeks, but it has to be done very carefully – not WHINING!!

      Message of moving the country forward, working for jobs, … Ms Pelosi can return from her 7th vacation and we can get to work right away on the People’s Business.

      Stop the Fake Impeachment and work on the People’s business.

      1. Bring USMCA to a vote for our Manufacturing industries, small businesses, and Farmers in 1 week.
      2. Agree to an infrastructure framework.
      3. Work collaboratively to lower drug prices for all citizens.

      Needless to say, the major networks may not cover it. More proof of Fake Journalism.

      Liked by 1 person

  30. I S says:

    Why is Nancy and Schiff in Jordan??


    • Plotting destruction. Reassuring the globalist crooks that the raping of U.S. taxpayers will continue to flow their way once they figure out a way to get rid of President Trump and his supporters.


  31. USA First! says:

    It is likely, highly likely, Nancy Pelosi does not have the votes to proceed with a full House impeachment authorization; so Pelosi, Schiff, Engel and Cummings ( 💀) have to rely on the duplicity of the media to help them hide their scheme.


  32. nb says:

    Is it lawful to demand another person’s property without authority?


  33. It is likely, highly likely, Nancy Pelosi does not have the votes to proceed with a full House impeachment authorization; so Pelosi, Schiff, Engel and Cummings have to rely on the duplicity of the media to help them hide their scheme.

    Um, yeah, it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that Cummings is relying on anything.

    Well, except still issuing subpoenas, so perhaps there is something there.


  34. ristvan says:

    There is an interesting side construct to Pelosi’s tweet, and a predictable rapid turn of events.

    First, she says lawful subpoenas, when that is not true.

    Then she uses the word defy, not obstruct—when defying a lawful congressional subpoena IS obstruction, AND was an Article in both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment processes. This suggests she knows the truth of the matter and wont dare go to court to try to get enforcement. In which case, obstruction CANNOT be a valid Article of impeachment. And they have NOTHING else. Call transcript released proving Whistleblower wrong. Doral G7 troll, so no emoluments clause.

    So I think Pelosi and Schiff will continue this charade indefinitely, and they helps PDJT. Its all about throwing fake news media mud on PDJT, not about a real impeachment. And I think increasingly we the people realize that despite biased MSM. Snippets like this one from this morning DO have a cumulative impact. And RNC can start media and social media 30 second spot advertising around it. Plenty of material already. Tlaib’s ‘impeach the M F’ followed by Collins complaint letter. Pelosi presser ‘no vote to commence a formal inquiry’ followed by McCarthy complain letter. Parscale can have a field day with that sort of material.

    Meanwhile, the big political news will very shortly (this coming week) turn to Spygate prosecutions. Durham having two Mifsud cell phones per last weeks Sidney Powell to Jusge Sullivan filing is a BIG deal. And, both SIMs were UK based. (Side note—Sidney’s detailed filing means Barr and/or Durham are helping her behind the scenes, meaning they now know Flynn was set up by IC just like Papadop and Page.) That leads directly to MI6 and so to Brennan and Clapper, and so to an illegitimate EC predicate as questioned by Barr in Congress and now specifically investigated by Durham.

    Liked by 12 people

  35. Take the fake news media down and we take our country back!!!

    There must be some way legally to deal with these corrupt crooked devils!

    Any media asshats reading here should know, there are very few people who believe anything you say , print, or show in pictures or video! We have seen the propaganda for ourselves now… you have ZERO credibility with most of the public now. Maybe you can still sway a few brain dead mouth breathers, but even they have their doubts.

    Liked by 2 people

    • WES says:

      Blind: Fake news can not remain undetected forever! Sooner or later someone notices!

      The USSR had fake news for over 70 years! It did not take Russians 70 years to figure this out!

      Example: I was working in Siberia when that Korean 747 airliner was shot down! A US co-worker heard the news via his shortwave radio. We then asked our Russian interpreters if they had heard anything about it? No, they had not! I don’t think they were overly shocked to tell you the truth. They simply wanted to know more of the details.


      • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

        The great Ronald Reagan used to say that from his experiences he found that the Russian people knew dang well that their press, like Pravda & Novosti, was always propaganda all the time.

        He had a story about the Russian and the foreign exchange student from Wisconsin discussing politics at a restaurant in Moscow one cold wintry day.

        The student said, “We are a free people. In America we can to go the White House and pound on a table and say that we don’t like the way the president is running the country.”

        The Russian replied, “We are also free. We can go to the Kremlin and pound on a table and say that we don’t like the way the American president is running his country.”


    • Linda says:

      Don’t know, but it would be nice if a class-action lawsuit could be done against against the fake MSM. I’m certainly being harmed by them; I’m sure there are plenty of other folks out there middle America who could say the same and back it up!


  36. She wants to play hardball
    Let’s play!


  37. CNN_sucks says:

    Wrap around smear. Liar, evil and ugly woman. We are praying for your health.


  38. TarsTarkas says:

    To all the legal minds out there? Do all the demand letters that have been issued so far instantly become actionable subpoenas the instant the Full House authorizes impeachment? Which would obviously mean that the Democrats would demand instant compliance with all 157,000 of them or be accused of obstruction?


  39. Seadoc66 says:

    Rape, Pillage, Plunder; America You’ve Been Had and It’s Your Own Damn Fault!
    America, you had best wake up! Nancy and the rest of the swamp, globalists, progressives, establishment, oligarchy, left, etc……. are pulling out every weapon at their disposal to destroy the ‘Outsider’ and negate any/all the power left in the hands of his supporters. Unlike past political struggles, if the left and their supporters should win there is no need to return to their old deceptive ways in that all the corruption is now out in the open for all to see. The Biden’s corrupt activities are just a tiny glimpse into the big picture. In short America, if the left succeeds in negating Donald Trump the picture of America’s (and the world’s) future is clear. Feudal lords with their legions of politicians and bureaucrats will rule over a world of mere serfs!

    Have a nice day America, while you still can!

    Soldier/Cop/Grunt, Retired

    PS Are any of you not aware of the real reason Nancy and many others in the swamp/media/establishment/etc.. are throwing anything/everything against the wall in an effort to negate Donald Trump? The answer is so simple that a rookie detective right out of his/her basic investigative management course could have the whole case file ready for a prosecutor within a week. Or even more simply stated, Nancy and Adam are doing their dead level best to cover their own behinds and those of hundreds more in the swamp and elsewhere!


  40. Admin User says:

    “It is likely, highly likely, Nancy Pelosi does not have the votes to proceed with a full House impeachment authorization; so Pelosi, Schiff, Engel and _Cummings_ have to rely on the duplicity of the media to help them hide their scheme.”

    cummings is dead.


  41. Brant says:

    Hey, some “new can read lawfare blog too” comments getting into her thread. More “vote required to get full subpoena authority” comments too. Some good push back.


  42. Brant says:

    I know off topic, but short. What is over/under on how many times Cummings will vote for his replacement?


  43. Jase says:

    So, I’m essence, this is just the Pelosi version of the Nigerian prince email scam, only worse. The scammers just want money: these morons know that their use of Ukraine as a giant money laundering nexus is close to being exposed, so they are putting the President – and the country – through all of this just in the hope of ginning up a bit of false equivalence.


  44. Somebody's Gramma says:

    Two can play Nancy’s game and frankly, from what I can see, Trump is far better at it than she is. She is looking more and more like a demented fool with each passing day. The more she thrashes about, goes to the mic, takes her little seditious trips here and there, the more we all stare in wonder that anyone of her “caliber” could possibly be 3rd in Command (which she takes literally). Her strategy is to drag out the bogus impeachment inquiry hoping beyond all hope it will effect 2020. It won’t. Trump’s strategy is to troll the hell out of these corrupt people while the DOJ is doing it’s job behind the scenes. I saw a statistic and I wish I could find it, that CNN’s viewership is below, like, the Discovery Channel. Most folks don’t get their news from the mainstream any more. They have lost their power. Everywhere I go, even in some out of the way thrift shop, people are talking about how great Trump is and how corrupt our politicians are. Everyone knows it’s a coup. Everyone is waiting for Justice to be done. Everyone is trusting that Trump has this. I’m still of the mind that should Justice NOT be done, there will be hell to pay, at the ballot box first, and by a thousand cuts afterwards. LOL. We can play the game too. We are way smarter than they are, evidenced by our ability to not be corrupt or compromised, right? My two cents.

    Liked by 6 people

  45. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Fake crime. Fake subpoena. Fake investigation. Fake congresswoman.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. Loren says:

    No Nancy its all out in the open. Nothing is hide anymore! We all know what has been going on in DC, how long is the question!


  47. Raptors2020 says:

    Rush thinks this is the Democrats’ election platform; not impeachment, but talk of impeachment, all through 2020.

    This may well please the big Democrat donors – the Hollywood dips have been driven mad by Trump- but Nancy doesn’t recognize the Republican voters will turn out in droves to protect their President. The few Republicans Pelosi deigns to speak to are GOPe and she’s, luckily for us, getting a very false picture.


  48. ATheoK says:

    “That predictable constitutional issue will end up with arguments to The Supreme Court.

    THAT appears to be why Democrats and left-wing activists have been working for months to de-legitimize the Supreme Court. They always intended to run into this problem. They planned for it.”

    Fortunately, Pelosi, Schiftface and nadslessr have been digging themselves very deep, as they’ve lied to Americans, fed falsehoods to the compliant press as they treasonously attacking the Constitution.

    Most Americans have not disgraced themselves and participate with Pelosi on her diabolical schemes. It’s why Pelosi can not move a real impeachment forward.

    Nor will America sit patiently while Pelosi and her parasites try to blame SCOTUS for adhering to the Constitution, Precedents and due process.

    Especially, since President Trump has America responding like a healthy racehorse in a winner take all race. The muscles are working together and we are traveling faster as we approach the midrace.

    2020 KAG elections are going to traumatize a lot of blithering idiots pretending to be democrats this term.
    With luck and more of pelosi’s pompous tantrums, the democrat party will be fully defunct by December 2020. No sane sensible person will admit to being a leftist elite democrat.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s