Rudy Giuliani: “The Democrats are Covering Up Corruption, Massive Corruption”…

Rudy Giuliani appears on Fox News to discuss the overall Ukraine issue.  Giuliani emphasizes that his investigation was directed toward conduct in 2016, *not* directed toward anything related to the 2020 election.  Mr. Giuliani is a man on a mission.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

450 Responses to Rudy Giuliani: “The Democrats are Covering Up Corruption, Massive Corruption”…

  1. Maquis says:

    This chick is off the rails!
    DNC talking points and orders from “on high.”
    😡

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Rudy is talking a good game, but I think we all know it’s going to come down to what Bill ‘Decline to Prosecute’ Barr does (or omits to do).

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Tazio Nuvolari says:

    Bring the pain Rudy! Bring the pain!

    Liked by 16 people

    • Rhi says:

      YEAH RUDY! Off the charts takedown of the swamp media talking points dutifully spouted by reprehensible Martha!

      With the exception of less than a handful, Faux News has gone full TDS.

      Gloves are off, it’s go time, where’s the zippo?

      Liked by 13 people

      • Matt Bracken says:

        Like

      • bruzedorange says:

        Martha conducted that interview like she was making a demo for a job interview at CNN.

        Today’s Fox News is pursuing “Fair & Balanced” as if truth itself is found at the center of a teeter-totter. Even worse, hosts like Martha seen to aspire to be the center fulcrum of a board that has MSNBC on the left side and Fox News on the right.

        Meanwhile, Truth stands alone at the edges of the media playground, looking for anyone who can play chess.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TPW says:

        Martha really hasn’t until now been bad in her coverage of PT. It is like she has gotten orders from above to tow a certain line. Part of their fake fair and balanced….

        Like

    • anthony says:

      The MSM will trash Rudy relentlessly just like you’d expect a morally vacuous society to do, let’s not relent to these broadsides. In the past Rudy has been smeared like when he was a potential Presidential candidate back in 2006 and when he was rumored to be an AG nominee, many on the GOP side ate up that tripe like baby chics getting the MSMs worm. The National Reviews, The Weekly Standards, and all the establishment ‘CONS’ would than whipsaw the MSM smears so that Rudy would be damaged and discounted. No one, I mean no one, on this earth has the history, the ability, the temerity, the guts to root out the crime and corruption like Rudy G – hell he is Captain Rico who has brought down Mobs and other illicit institutions. I recommend that when you see those on our side or their side selling smears against Rudy that we expose the wickedness of their lies about Rudy and argue back that there is no one more fit to take down the Deep State for President Trump then Rudy G!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Amy2 says:

        I think Rudy is totally enjoying this. I’m sure he would love to take this all the way through prosecuting it! A man who loves his work is always successful at it! Plus, he has had to keep quiet while investigating and gathering evidence. Blow it all out Rudy! As much as you legally can, we’re with you!!

        Like

    • chipin8511 says:

      This is a must must must listen… Trump will slay them he wins he wants impeachment ..Then the Senate show trials begin ion worldwide TV Senate in control of Russia gate subpoena as they can call Clinton Obama Brennan Clapper all of them Trump has the edvenmice Boom MOAB heard round the world…This is the plan.. I am very encouraged.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Liberty ONE says:

    As one who was involved in LE. the moral is …..when you have the goods on someone, they SH*T in their pants. Exactly, what Mr. G has AND a great track record.

    Liked by 9 people

  5. burnett044 says:

    Rudy like a old bird dog has picked up the scent….his eyes looked sharp and I do believe he is enjoying this…..you go Rudy.

    Liked by 19 people

    • GB Bari says:

      I’d say Rudy’s more like a bloodhound……

      Liked by 12 people

    • Remington says:

      Rudy has a lock on….Nice to see him in this mode again. For a while there he was floating. Now he has that eye of the tiger.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Republicanvet91 says:

        In many respects, I firmly believe Rudy “floating” was a ruse. I don’t claim to know why they are doing this at this time, but Rudy “floating” was an issue discussed a couple months ago. I recall suggestions from some in the media that Rudy was hurting Trump because he appeared out of his depth. I also recall some comment in the media or from some talking head that Rudy was hitting the bottle.
        A couple months or more ago, Rudy had much of this information. Why was he floating then?
        I suspect they knew A LOT about this long ago, and they got to the point of the timing being right.

        Liked by 7 people

        • Elmo334 says:

          I think Rudy was baiting the MSM by going on FOX and acting wacky and saying confusing things. Then the dopes get him on their show like Stephenopopoulos did last week. Rudy destroyed him and made him look like the shill he is.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Sherri Young says:

        It is great to see Rudy back in prosecutor mode. He is thriving on this stuff. Being on the defense, especially in a frame-up, is not his thing. Actually being able to get the facts, right wrongs, and make the world a better place obviously invigorates him.

        This is some great “toxic” masculinity at age 75. I hope some young men pay attention and use Rudy as one of their behavior models.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Super Elite says:

        Eagle eye.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Amy2 says:

        And the back of our lion!

        Like

    • The Demon Slick says:

      Martha is breaking my heart. So beautiful. So swampy. She’s really cranked up the fake narratives in the last few weeks. I had already given up on her when she did it the first time blaming Pamela Gellar for being shot at in Garland Texas. She implied it was her fault because they drew mohammed. That was gross. Normally since she’s been fairly neutral most of the time, and she sure is nice to look at. But right when the fake whistle blower story broke she went full cover up. I can’t even watch her anymore.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Cheesehead54016 says:

        Me neither. To me she is similar now to Wallace and quickly gaining on Juan W and Shep. Whenever those three are blabbering I immediately turn channel. You are catching up Martha.
        Does anybody think Juan and Shep will ever admit that they were blinded by their bias and thus they deserve to be shunned by viewers/fired? Will find out soon……

        Liked by 2 people

        • Jim says:

          She is horrible. Very apparent that she is a swamp creature. Fox (except between 8 pm and 11 pm) is but a shell of its former self. Include Lou Dobbs as another good one, but the News Channel

          Like

        • mtndesert says:

          Martha was easy to figure out before the term swamp was out there. She was one of those who handled Presidential candidate Herman Cain’s false accuser with kid gloves because she lived in the same building as Axelrod. Then a couple of years later she has a feel good interview segment with Axelrod and family regarding their daughters epilepsy. Wonder how that happened. Martha has made a great swampian replacement for Megyn!

          Liked by 1 person

          • mtndesert says:

            Sorry to confuse, more coffee!! Martha did not live in Axelrod building, Herman Cain’s accuser Sharon Bialek did.

            Like

          • anthonydog says:

            Sandra Smith shows her swamp colors occasionally. These self entitled communist babes will be put out to pasture soon as they’re being replaced by younger brain washed empty vessels.

            Like

        • Peppurr says:

          To me, at least Juan is personable. Martha comes across as a stuck-up snob. Shep has a LOT of seething anger in him and often has meltdowns.

          Liked by 1 person

      • QCM says:

        Martha knows who signs her paycheck, and it ain’t the American citizen.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Mojo says:

        I switch channels to Fox Business and watch Lou Dobbs when she’s on. Martha never has struck me as a journalist.

        Liked by 2 people

    • FinbarOS says:

      Looks to me like a cat with a mouse.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. arze says:

    I don’t think Martha is “covering” anything up. She is demonstrably quite ignorant. In that, within the Media Apostles, that is just one of their institutional problems.

    Were Martha not so stupefyingly ignorant, she would not look so stupid, insecure, defensive and silly.

    Someone, anyone with a grasp of the facts would have an idea of what is going on and what has gone on, in this matter, and would laser focus on what the news actually is.

    She is ignorant and thus incapable of conducting a genuine interview that would or could be in the public interest. But because she’s inept, Rudy easily worked around her.

    The Ukraine Corruption did not begin in 2014 of course. However, the most corrupt act, even though this is too soft of word for it, . . . the most corrupt US action in 2014 was encouraging, aiding, with force of arms, the overthrow of the democratically elected President, Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych.

    At the time, the media apostles in US were all in on this Obama-orchestrated coup against duly elected Ukraine president.

    Any frame of reference for what is currently going down, politically and otherwise in US, must include this frame of reference. And of course this frame of reference includes the same media collusion, from then to now.

    Republicans and Democrats, nearly all unanimous in supporting overthrow of Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych. Ditto US media.

    A slice of this pie that lives onto today is Biden, the Obama point man for Ukraine in 2014.

    The Washington “consensus” about the Ukraine coup of 2014 was that it was really, a “peoples revolt to bring democracy” or words to that effect.

    Except that Obama was up to his ears in the para military coup to depose Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych.

    During President Trump’s recent meeting/news conference with Ukraine’s current President Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelensky — during this Trump stated to Pres. Z: it was when Obama was president that the terrible war began. And he told Pres. Z to work with Putin to end the war.

    Obama’s lackeys like Brennan keep throwing curve balls on Ukraine, as they keep doing on Libya, and on Syria…imagine if Trump asked the DOJ to investigate US corruption in the over throw of Libyan president Gadaffi? At the time, that country had free health care, education, housing, the highest living standard in Africa. Obama and Clinton destroyed it. Again, corruption is kind of a soft term, but is apropos as well.

    Today the state department on travel to Libya states: “Libya – Level 4: Do Not Travel. Do not travel to Libya due to crime, terrorism, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed conflict. Crime levels in Libya remain high, including the threat of kidnapping for ransom. Westerners and U.S. citizens have been targets of these crimes.”

    Don’t expect Martha or any of the other jack assess posing as “journalists” on TV or in print to even make an attempt to want to know what is historically the case. Martha has no business sitting in that chair, as neither do most of her colleagues, at her network and others, and those in print. But there they sit. Aided and abetted by an ignorant political class wanting to make money off of regime change; aided and abetted by the Dick Cheny types of Haliburton and such wanting to make money, and those in academia, and so on and so forth.

    Rudy, for all his faults, would not otherwise have gone to Ukraine to upset this apple cart; however, he didn’t start the fire…and the fire starters are going after his man….and the fire starters are now quite regretting they poured gasoline on this in the hope to scare Rudy. Now the “narrative” is out of control.

    And Trump is OK with that, if for no other reason than: he knows who the enemy is, and as need be, names them, as need be….

    PS
    Sundance’s post late this evening on the auto worker strike and what they told CNN is real news. The biggest threat, to we the people: is poverty, and being jailed or killed for telling the truth when the powerful want us silenced. I also have a sneaking suspicion Trump understands this, and is one reason for his popularity — a man standing up to those powerful forces who literally want him silenced and taken out.

    Liked by 31 people

    • Sammy Hains says:

      Martha has a set of questions and points she has been instructed to raise by Paul Ryan.

      She is just a news reader. She’s following her script.

      Liked by 11 people

      • “She’s following her script.” To drive me crazy, she tilts her listening head like a dog in order to feign sincere interest, then instantly pounces an interruption to stop Mayor Giuliani when he voices the ‘kill shot’. The blonde is quick to interrupt a change of subject when the ‘kill shot’ destroys the impeachment foundation. The Mayor blows right past this lightweight’s attempts. I admire the gentleman, at his age, being able to go 15 rounds, several shows each day. He floats like a butterfly and stings like bee.

        Liked by 3 people

    • suejeanne1 says:

      A few months back, the McCain family was quite proud of the fact that the late Sen. John McCain was honored with a street named after him in Kiev. They took off the name that had been there – that of a courageous fighter of the Nazis – who happened to be Russian – a “Soviet” – Ivan Kudrya –

      it seemed to me that it was so pointedly anti-Russian of them to do this, making a point of “disremembering” a truly courageous individual who fought the Nazis –

      I guess Sen. McCain must have done something really great for Ukraine, but I don’t know what it was – I suppose it was more than what Ivan Kudrya did so long ago, but it beats me what it was that McCain actually did that warranted the removal of Mr. Kuydrya’s name.

      Liked by 15 people

      • suejeanne1 says:

        Mr. Kudrya

        Like

      • arze says:

        During the time of McCain’s funeral, I remarked to a friend that unlike everywhere else, the one place where there was nearly universal condemnation of McCain was here, CTH. There was more than a thousand comments here. The friend was dismissive.

        Those of us who followed McCain’s words and deeds saw a wife-beating, self-righteous, war-mongering maniac, who, in the famous words of then-candidate Trump: McCain is not a war hero.

        I like this one too:

        As for McCain and Ukraine, he was working with the Obama Regime to over throw the democratically elected president, here he is in the below story — here he is lying his ass off as usual:

        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/15/john-mccain-ukraine-protests-support-just-cause

        Liked by 14 people

        • suejeanne1 says:

          Thank you for your “like” and your comment plus the links –

          here is a link to an article in the Washington Examiner about the renaming of a street in honor of John McCain:

          https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/ukrainian-president-wants-to-name-street-after-john-mccain

          caption for the photo that appears with the article in the Washington Examiner article:

          Sen. John McCain, center left, poses with Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko center, Sen. Lindsey Graham, center right, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar for a photo with the Ukrainian marines in December 2016.
          (AP Photo/Mikhail Palinchak)

          Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko wants to name a street in Kiev after the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the presidential office announced Monday.
          The Ukrainian president is asking the parliament’s factions to support his initiative to rename Ivan Kudrya Street after McCain, said Irina Lutsenko, an aide to Poroshenko.
          Lutsenko’s remarks were noted by Russia’s state-run media, given how the gesture doubles as an homage to the senator and a political jab at Russia. Poroshenko’s parliamentary allies, in endorsing the proposal, cited McCain’s support for Ukraine during the still-simmering conflict with Russia for control of the eastern region of the country.
          “One would find it very difficult to find a more committed and loyal friend of Ukraine,” top lawmaker Artur Gerasimov said, per local media. “Many Ukrainian politicians do not go to the frontline, and John McCain joined Ukrainian Marines on the New Year’s Eve — despite all the shooting.”
          McCain visited the Ukrainian military on New Year’s Eve 2016, in response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine. “We stand w/ them in their fight against #Putin’s aggression,” he tweeted at the time.
          Poroshenko’s choice of which street to rename is also laden with political connotation. Ivan Kudrya was a Soviet intelligence officer, born in the Kiev region, who was executed by the Nazis after compiling a list of double agents.
          The history of the Second World War in Ukraine has a contested legacy, as Ukrainian nationalists regard their era as a Soviet satellite state with distaste while Russia touts the history of the fight against the Nazis as a point of pride and identifies any effort to remove a Soviet-era World War II monument as proof that Ukrainian nationalism is a neofascist movement.
          “Ever since Ukraine’s February revolution, the Kremlin has characterized the new leaders in Kiev as a ‘fascist junta’ made up of neo-Nazis and anti-Semites, set on persecuting, if not eradicating, the Russian-speaking population,” as the BBC noted in 2014. “But Ukrainian officials and many in the media err to the other extreme. They claim that Ukrainian politics are completely fascist-free. This, too, is plain wrong. As a result, the question of the presence of the far-right in Ukraine remains a highly sensitive issue, one which top officials and the media shy away from.”
          Poroshenko attended McCain’s funeral last week. “Surely no coincidence that #JohnMCain – who planned every detail of today’s memorial – invited Ukraine’s President @poroshenko & seated him beside @jensstoltenberg, head of NATO,” Samantha Power, who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under former President Barack Obama, tweeted Saturday.

          Liked by 5 people

          • Spot on actual reality of who no name, grahamnesty and dhimm candidate klobuchar are. An Anon on /pol/ last week brought on a dig on klobuchar that is still ongoing and the dirt of that family/friends is incredible.

            Moar to Come, for sure, on the vastness of the entire swamp. President Trump, the VSG Law & Order President, has indeed started the beginning of the end for many.

            Liked by 1 person

        • Mike says:

          And don’t ever forget that Grahamnesty was a McCain acolyte. How much do you want to bet that Graham knew about the dossier in August 2016 just like McCain. Grahamnesty is not to be trusted.

          Liked by 4 people

      • donna kovacevic says:

        One could ask Oleg Deripaska, he would know the doings of No Name.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Sherri Young says:

          One could also ask Bill Browder about the details behind No-Name’s Magnitsky Act. Magnitsky was not a corruption-fighting attorney and hero. Magnitsky was not even an attorney at all. He was an accountant who helped set up the shell entities through which Browder’s Hermitage Fund committed tax fraud in Russia.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Deplorable Ukie says:

        “Spirit of historical truth”

        Suejeanne,
        Let’s talk about Ivan Kudrya’s real achievements. He was a KGB operative whose main task in 1941-1942 Kyiv was to fight against Ukrainian nationalists.

        Soviet ideologues created layers of fake history to brainwash and control their citizens of all ages, and to suppress and destroy the Ukrainian nationalist movement. Ivan Kudrya is just one of many fake heroes, alongside Pavlik Morozov, Mykola Schors, Grigory Kotovsky, and so on.

        Putin’s Russia unveils the statue of Ivan the Terrible in 2016. But Kremlin desinformation and propaganda machine – which still clings to the Soviet fake history and its heroes – is apoplectic when John McCain takes place of Ivan Kudrya.

        Funny that.

        September 2019.

        “No Russian representatives were invited to the commemorative events in Poland on the 80th anniversary of the start of World War II due to Russia’s disinterest in maintaining the “spirit of historical truth”, Polish Deputy Foreign Minister Szymon Szynkowski vel Sęk told in an interview.
        https://uawire.org/poland-explains-why-russia-was-not-invited-to-world-war-ii-anniversary

        “Poland will commemorate the date alongside representatives of countries that cooperate with Warsaw to ensure peace on the basis of compliance with international law and respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries.”

        “Breaking these rules was a hallmark of the aggressors of 1939, and remains the greatest threat to peace today,” Szczerski observed.
        https://uawire.org/poland-explains-why-putin-is-not-invited-to-world-war-ii-commemoration#

        So Poland invited Ukraine but not Russia.
        Poland had suffered enough at the hands of the Russian empire and the Soviet Union. As did Ukraine. Let it sink in.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Deplorable Ukie says:

          2012.

          Obama asks Medvedev to tell Vladimir that he is going to be more flexible after election.
          As President Trump has mentioned, Ukrainian conflict happened on Obama’s watch.

          2014.

          Russia annexes Crimea and starts the war in Eastern Ukraine.

          McCain was not alone in Ukraine. There is another figure whose role in those events is at just as important, but whose name is kept in shadow, likely on purpose.
          Vlad Surkov, Putin’s ideological aide.

          Here is a CTH comment by Zippy.

          The emails [delivered by the Ukrainian hacker] illustrate Russian plans to politically destabilize Ukraine and the coordination of affairs with major opposition leaders in separatist east Ukraine. The document release included a document sent by Denis Pushilin, former Chair of the People’s Soviet of the Donetsk People’s Republic, listing casualties that occurred from 26 May to 6 June 2014. It also included a 22-page outline of “a plan to support nationalist and separatist politicians and to encourage early parliamentary elections in Ukraine, all with the aim of undermining the government in Kiev.”

          https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/15/may-15th-2019-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-846/comment-page-4/#comment-7013766

          2016.
          The famous geographer Putin explains to a 9-year old that Russia’s borders do not end.

          To prevent a takeover by Russia, the Ukrainians choose the United States. One day, there might be a Trump street in Kyiv. And Fort Trump in Poland.

          PS. I am on a visit to Kyiv.

          Liked by 1 person

        • suejeanne1 says:

          I appreciate your excellent points regarding Russia and the Ukraine as well as Russia and Poland – it is my understanding that Ivan Kudrya actually took action, courageously fighting the Nazis until he was captured, tortured and killed. Yes, he was a “Soviet” but he was working against the Nazis in Ukraine, just as other brave Russians fought in Stalingrad and French and Polish resistance fighters also worked against the Nazis. I am concerned about the long-term agenda now of leaders of the EU and NATO that may be pushing for conflict with Russia and using old antipathy to polarize the atmosphere.

          Where was the concern about terrible Russia when Obama removed the Missile Shield early in his first term? Where was the concern about Russia? Poland and the Czech Republic, if I recall, were pretty worried about that but it didn’t matter to Obama or his advisers.

          In recent years, it seems to me that the EU and NATO leaders are trying to talk about “massing along the borders” of the nations of Eastern Europe, such as Poland and Hungary, nations that are asserting their sovereignty and refusing the admittance of more refugees being poured into their countries – not as the result of actions by Russia, but I think because of EU policies.

          So, let’s say the EU and NATO leaders can get everyone worried about Russia and in the name of “protecting” those nations in-between, they could ignite a chaotic turmoil for all of those countries, pushing refugees INTO them, overwhelming them.

          I just always worried about that darn John McCain for example, always willing to get us into some kind of mess – but was he ever willling to call out China?

          So with Ukraine now, I would like to know exactly what John McCain did to merit all the accolades and if he was directly involved with the Bidens and enabling the Burisma deal or if he had anything to do with the Chinese and the Bidens other deal.

          Liked by 1 person

    • suejeanne1 says:

      Martha finally turned us off last year, following her interview of Justice and Mrs. Kavanaugh – Martha came off as totally unworthy and shallow and catty – we don’t want her in our living room!

      Liked by 9 people

    • bertdilbert says:

      Rudy was trying to present news. She came off as trying to attack everything he said thus preventing news. Rudy came off as the bigger person. Hopefully Rudy and his team can assemble multiple lawsuits and light things up.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Dutchman says:

      arze,
      EXCELLENT, detailed summary of Obama admin. Foreign policy. I would add one think, both overall, and with particular emphasis on the ME;

      Often, when we see foreign policy actions by our government, that result in consequences NOT beneficial to the U.S. or ‘western’ interests, we say
      “The rule of UNintended consequences”.

      So, in other words, we went into Iraq, even though theyvhad NOTHING to do with 911.(Bush, the ‘brother from another mother’ of Bill Clinton)

      Then the Obama admin, with Hillary leading, fostered both the operation in Ukraine, as you describe.
      Further, the fostered the Arab Spring, ostensibly to encourage Democracy thruout the middle east countries.

      Yeah, cause it worked out SO well in Iraq, taking people of a very different culture, and imposing Democracy on them (eyeroll).

      Now, one of the operations was, as Sundance has detailed Operation No-Name, in Syria, and Operation Zero Footprint in Lybia, which gave U.S. weaponry, including manpads, to Al Quada and ISIS.

      EFFECTIVELY, destabilizing the whole region with war, which had the effect of driving millions of muslims OUT of their homelands, in a diaspora to, primarily Western Europe.

      And, EU countries SUPPORTED these efforts, and then the EU forced EU countries to accept/absorb these illegal immigrants.

      And this was ALL “Unintended Consequences”? Even though it was all foreseeable?

      And, is there,a parallel between this, and operation Fast/Furious, funneling weopons to the Cartels, resulting in a mass diaspora from Central America, up into the U.S.?

      At a certain point, you reach the “Third time, its NOT “Happenstance”, or “Coincidence”; it is ENEMY ACTION.

      It is fully INTENDED CONSEQUENCES, to destabilise ‘western society’, as part of “Globalism”; Global CONmunism, which can ONLY happen if Western Governments, Capitalist Democracies are overthrown from within.

      Conmunism is NOT about the professed ideology; thats just to fool the ‘useful idiot masses’, AND the fanatical zeolot true believers who do most of the dirty work.

      For those at the TOP, the ideology is just an excuse, for a small group to control, and exploit everyone else. And THATS what “Globalism” is all about.

      Liked by 20 people

    • 🍺Gunny66 says:

      arze,
      Good post. Absolutely on point and intelligently given.
      Nice

      Liked by 3 people

    • TJ says:

      “I also have a sneaking suspicion Trump understands this”

      “The only thing that can stop this corrupt machine, is YOU. The only force strong enough to save our country, is US. The only people brave enough to vote out this corrupt establishment……is you, the AMERICAN people.” Donald J. Trump, October 13th 2016

      “When we reflect that the eyes of the virtuous all over the earth are turned with anxiety on us as the only depositories of the sacred fire of liberty, and that our falling into anarchy would decide forever the destinies of mankind and seal the political heresy that man is incapable of self-government, the only contest between divided friends should be who will dare farthest into the ranks of the common enemy.” –Thomas Jefferson to John Hollins, 1811. ME 13:58

      Who will dare the farthest into the ranks of the common enemy of unaccountable, incompetent, and corrupt government?

      Liked by 4 people

    • Mark says:

      She is really stupidly annoying. I had to turn this off. At first I fast forwarded to when Rudy was speaking but….her constant interruptions and ignorance of the subject matter. Rudy was bring factual content out on what was going on and all she was doing was throwing out democrat talking points.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Bill Dumanch says:

    It’s changing from “Fox News” to “Fox Ruse”.

    Liked by 6 people

  8. MustangBlues says:

    ”’archie says:
    October 4, 2019 at 11:40 pm
    It’s my firm belief that Limbaugh et al and Fox News have been a net detriment to the country. First, the lemmings hang on their every world as if it is fact –”’

    Yes, it is always the lemmings, hanging on those worlds like facts, the deplorables, the mutant rejects of life. they cause all the problems for the elitists, the royalty, beta zygotes, pissants, road kill in the scheme of things.

    When will the archies rule?? Will the be elected??? Will the lemmings get a vote???

    You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the winds blow, now do you?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Very few will admit the absolute truth of years of lying by omission from mainstream talking heads of which limbaugh and most everyone at faux “news” have perpetrated on the people that tune in for their bloviating “entertainment”.

      The first of which at least admits he is, as an entertainer. People should READ between the LINES.

      Like

  9. Magabear says:

    This article by John Nolte at Breitbart sums up this entire pile of demonrat crapola:

    https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/10/04/nolte-media-desperation-hits-defcon-1-as-ukraine-hoax-unravels/

    But be prepared, folks. the fake news NYT is claiming a second fake whistleblower is thinking of filing a complaint (oh my!). I suspect there will be at least 3 faux whistleblowers lined up in order to give this fake impeachment scheme maximum momentum. And guess who their 2nd hand sources are? Themselves!

    Liked by 4 people

    • Carrie says:

      Yeah, I guess the hoax isn’t complete until they parallel completely the Kavanaugh nonsense. However many people they orchestrated in that debacle will magically also appear in this case. They do like their patterns (a bit like most serious criminals do too). My magic eight ball told me all of this.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Magabear says:

        I’m just curious as to how someone (NYT) could know that someone was thinking about filing a whistleblower complaint? Is there a “I’m thinking of filing” form that’s made public before the official complaint is filed? 🤔

        The more likely possibilities are A. the NYT just made this up, or B. Pencil Neck’s lawfare crew is tipping off the Times to their already planned rollout of whistleblower mania.

        Liked by 8 people

        • littleanniefannie says:

          Maybe this WB didn’t know with whom to file so he/she/it (threw it in for the gender denial crowd) decided to go to the most trusted source. Then again, the WB May be a Times employee who saw notes in the Times fantasy section!

          Like

        • Carrie says:

          I’m loving your “I’m thinking of filing ” form! LOL. Was that one added right after the “Hearsay rocks and evidence be dammed” form was suddenly approved?

          Liked by 1 person

  10. Elle says:

    It was fun watching her get a clue that maybe it’s not cool to be defending massive corruption. But then her brain glitches gzzzt… Democrats good. Trump bad. gzzt…

    Like

  11. anthonydog says:

    Martha obviously works for the Democrats. She was outrageously rude to Mr. Giuliani.
    Wait until she has to report on “THE HAMMER”… She will finish unraveling.

    THE REAL WHISTLEBLOWER STORY: DENNIS MONTGOMERY, THE HAMMER, THE HARD DRIVES, THE WIRETAPPING OF TRUMP, AND THE PROSECUTION OF GENERAL FLYNN – The American Report

    https://theamericanreport.org/2019/09/27/the-real-whistleblower-story-dennis-montgomery-the-hammer-the-hard-drives-the-wiretapping-of-trump-and-the-prosecution-of-general-flynn/

    Liked by 2 people

    • HellInAHandbasket says:

      P R E S I D E N T
      T R U M P
      I S
      T H E
      *REAL*
      W H I S T L E B L O W E R !

      Liked by 1 person

    • Thinker says:

      Fantastic Read!! If anyone wants to know a lot of the truth behind all of this, read this story. It shows why the Deep State is so “hell-bent” on getting rid of Trump– they have been spying on all of America.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Peppurr says:

      Wow !!!!

      Liked by 1 person

    • CM-TX says:

      From article:

      | The Key To The Coup Is “THE HAMMER,” Not The NSA And 702 Abuse

      Those who suggest that the coup is about the NSA and 702 abuse are either simply wrong or involved in tactical deception.

      “THE HAMMER” and the illegal surveillance that took place under John Brennan and James Clapper is the key to understanding the coup.

      Dennis Montgomery was at Fort Washington, Maryland with John Brennan and James Clapper where they employed “THE HAMMER” to spy on all of America for “blackmail” and “leverage.” They utilized THE HAMMER to strong-arm anyone and everyone who got in their way as they turned America into a police state. |

      (Maybe it’s BOTH?)

      Liked by 1 person

      • anthonydog says:

        Perhaps one precipitated the other—but as a over up and distraction from a far more egregious violation of the constitution-in fact it’s destruction. One is but violations of protocols —the other points to the villain Brennan who STOLE THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM.

        Like

  12. spoogels says:

    Paul Sperry

    BREAKING: Conflicted, Biased Inspector General Has Long Track Record of ‘Pulling Punches,” Warn Former Investigators

    https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/09/30/straight_shooter_justice_watchdog_has_held_fire_on_top_brass_120596.html

    Liked by 3 people

    • Maquis says:

      Dude was Legal Counsel for the FBI NSD during the creation of the Russia Hoax, the very nerve center of the Coup Conspiracy, he’s dirty as hell.

      Like

    • f2000 says:

      Regarding the possible tone or findings of the Horowitz report, If my understanding is correct, the draft of that report is already being circulated (has been for a couple weeks). I would expect that key people have a decent idea of what’s in there, either from directly reading it or from someone passing them some notes. If it was friendly to the Dems, I would expect to hear them talking about since they absolutely cannot keep anything that helps them quiet. That they aren’t talking about it, and several republicans are vaguely referencing it being jaw dropping gives me some hope that the report is the real deal. On a related note, this whistleblower nonsense started getting pushed hard around the same time as the draft report was released.

      Maybe I’m reading the tea leaves poorly.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Peppurr says:

      omg……….I so DID NOT want this to be the case. sigh

      Like

  13. Bendix says:

    Anyone else think the only reason we kept being told Biden was the favorite candidate was so we wouldn’t notice that the only reason he was even in the race was so President Trump could be blamed for investigating a political rival?

    That’s probably the reason half of them are running.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Carrie says:

    Can I just express my outrage at getting this National Review article sent to me by a Democrat friend. It actually doesn’t point to any actual crimes, just that PDJT is being “unethical” and it isn’t his job to investigate Biden. I asked her who would? The CIA or FBI that helped create the Steele dossier? The DOJ that ignored this information for more than a year? How are a Democrat’s missing the magnitude of the crime of this attempted coup?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/trump-defenders-have-adopted-a-doctrine-of-infallibility/

    Like

    • FPCHmom says:

      Then why are you posting it here if it’s so bad?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Carrie says:

        Likewise, I’m not so much into “Hope porn”. It is the age old discussion about some Treepers not wanting some information to ever be printed here – although the NYT and WaPo are even used in many SD articles. You don’t learn about the enemy if you refuse to see their perspective. You also don’t construct excellent counter arguments if you don’t hear their arguments to begin with. I’m on a couple of sites defending PDJT every day practically, and that is effective only if you know what is being said. Terribly sorry if I offended you that I posted a link to a “purportedly” Republican publication was being used to put another shiv in our President’s back and I was annoyed by that. That friend of mine was incredibly close to saying she wouldn’t vote at all in the upcoming elections- which I found to be a big help for our side.

        Liked by 2 people

    • GB Bari says:

      We’re not really into “outrage porn”.
      Personally, National Review isn’t on my Favorites/ Bookmarks list on any computer or mobile devices I own. When a William S. Buckley died, so did the last vestiges of any credibility of that publication.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Diddian says:

      Before I even looked, I knew by the title the author would be Jonah Goldberg.

      HUGE disappointment, he. There are costs to refusing to grow up: You enjoy all the established perks of remaining in your youthful delusions, but you lose all the wholesome possibilities derived from living in the truth.

      Like

  15. nobodyspecial1958 says:

    I can understand why the democrats are worried. What I don’t understand is why Martha mccallum is so disingenuous. Why would a reporter who wants to look like she is on the ball and as good as a man reporter be so determined to prevent the true story from coming out? I can think of numerous questions that would make her look like a good pressing questioner and would help the cause of truth at the same time. Rudy, what is the significance of CrowdStrike to this inquiry? What do you think will be revealed regarding the DNC servers and CrowdStrike provided the Ukrainians come through with their investigation? Are there things that you suspect or know to be true regarding the DNC servers and what was found by CrowdStrike? Do you know why the FBI would be denied access to their servers but a Ukrainian company would be trusted by the Clinton campaign? Is there anything you can tell us regarding that relationship? Would you say that you were looking to see if CrowdStrike had evidence that the Russians did not hack the DNC servers? What do you know of the circumstances of Seth Rich’s death? Do you think CrowdStrike has relevant information r/e that investigation?
    See it isn’t that hard to ask relevant questions. Wonder why none of them get asked?

    Liked by 4 people

    • Maquis says:

      Is the server in Ukraine? Yeah, the kind of fascinating facts a real mind could get out of Rudy if they weren’t a Derp State Puppet.

      Liked by 2 people

      • nobodyspecial1958 says:

        CrowdStrike, the company that examined the DNC servers is in the Ukraine. I assume the DNC servers are on DNC property.

        Like

    • cboldt says:

      They don’t get asked because hard truths are forbidden subjects. The most important function the press has is to keep the people in and under control. The PTB view the truth as having a tendency to make a populace restive.
      Go there — and you are certainly allowed to — and that cushy studio and paycheck will be stripped, and you will relegated to the collection of misfit fringe conspiracy nutcases.
      The norms are enforced motly with peer pressure and control of information fed to the teleprompter readers. Preoccupy their time with the makeup room, show prep, being informed by handlers … how many hours are there in a day? These people are not exposed to much in the way of forbidden truths.
      To be fair, many forbidden truths truly are nutcase jobs, and those preoccupy too many people and too much time. But the $$ press is very very uniform in its coverage and misrepresentation of reality.

      Like

      • Shona Hammonds says:

        Trump is performing the Labours of Hercules. This is the cleaning of the Augean Stables, and he’s using the House and the Never Trumpers as the rivers Alpheus and Peneus

        “Hercules, after he had called the son of Augeas to witness the agreement, tore the foundations away from one side of the stables; directed to it by means of a canal the streams of Alpheus and Peneus that flowed near by; and let the waters carry away the filth through another opening. So he accomplished the menial work without stooping to anything unworthy of an immortal.”

        From Tales Beyond Belief.com

        Like

      • TPW says:

        Yep I beleive Martha was given her marching orders…..before I watched her turn from….not so much Trump….to fair coverage. Complete change……she started out with her total shock that PT would stick his neck out there by going after his opposition this way ….cause well it makes him look unnecessarily bad ….she pretends to not know all the facts but I think she does…..but told to ignore and take her coverage in a certain direction…..this would have to do with the murdochs and their involvement with the various globalist. FOX has made a big move when sons took over to include fair for democrats even if they had to lie or ignore facts……really think they will never win over the nutty left they would run off conservatives ….so i think they are after the independents….but assuming they are stupid is dangerous to total viewership.I think FOX relies much more on advertisers than the others who are operating on billionaires money who push propaganda only. Either way we need other outlets and the internet is killing them all….why they are slowly trying to sensor and when PT is out it will be first thing they do.

        Liked by 1 person

      • nobodyspecial1958 says:

        I can agree with much of that but the fringe news is not as nut job as I always believed. It is true that people like Alex Jones sometimes go off half cocked and maybe even get tricked sometimes, but the mainstream deliberately lie to us to keep us from the truth and then mock the ones who actually want to expose everything.

        Liked by 1 person

    • weirdcan88 says:

      Wow! nobodyspecial1958 — exactly the questions I would also like her to ask. But to be trite, she’s a blonde, albeit a very good looking one… Maybe that explains, in some part, her bias:
      cid:A79C1BD5-A36E-45D1-B2B1-E3625D1FC10A/1817035A-56F4-4E51-8164-95F55DFA2433
      (video)

      Like

    • farrier105 says:

      See it isn’t that hard to ask relevant questions. Wonder why none of them get asked?

      Easy. Both parties believe the Russians did it. A lot of that evidence came from a server the alleged Russians leased inside the US. We are told Russian agents were dumb enough to work on DNC computers on which they planted keylogging software. By working on those computers, the Russian agents had THEIR key strokes logged and they were too stupid to delete them from their leased server’s memory. All the keystrokes were there for the FBI, or so we have been told. Republicans believe this as well as Democrats. Therefore, the reporters will not ask those questions, and federal investigators will work under the assumption that the Crowdstrike report was accurate.

      That is why things remain the same. No one will mention Seth Rich as part of that investigation. Until someone finds the kind of evidence that will make Seth Rich a logical suspect (his being shot does not do that) as the source of the DNC emails for Wikileaks, this is the way things will change until we use ALTERNATIVE CHALLENGES to Crowdstrike’s claims other than, “No, Seth Rich did it.”

      The FBI did not “look at the server” to prove the Russians did it, buy the people who believe that Seth Rich did it never laid eyes on the server, either, did they?

      Like

      • nobodyspecial1958 says:

        The FBI is the designated department of the government expected to examine hardware in a case like this. The fact that they didn’t is a fact that speaks all by itself. When coupled with the lack of effort to examine the circumstances around Hillary’s server and destroyed emails, and her actions in Libya and Benghazi present a set of circumstances that demand scrutiny. I think the key phrase in your reply is” so we’ve been told”. We have listened to almost 3 years of that and it is all bull as we see now. We don’t know what you say we know but we do know that Hillary committed crimes and no one wants to look because they don’t want to be culpable themselves and they don’t want to do the job either. As far as the questions go, the point is that no one is asking them and it is possible to reach a point where we have facts. I know why if you don’t.

        Like

        • farrier105 says:

          You presented me with a series of non sequiturs to support your belief that Seth Rich stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks. Just as you claim the FBI must “examine the hardware” to prove Russians did it, you have the same burden by your logic. You must “examine the hardware.” What Hillary did in all of those other cases where she can be logically suspected of crimes cannot be extrapolated to prove Seth Rich did anything to that system. What you need to do is unravel the Crowdstrike report. Once that is impeached, for legitimate reasons, we can go on to find out what REALLY happened, including if Seth Rich did it and no one else. Until then, no one is going to listen who can make a change in what is rapidly becoming history just like Lee Harvey Oswald shooting Kennedy is history.

          When you are dealing with elected office holders who are convinced, because of what they say is EVIDENCE that Russians committed the hack, you can’t refute that belief by simply saying “Seth Rich did it and that was why he was killed.” Three years of trying should have convinced everyone of that. The Seth Rich approach failed for three years. Add to it the fact the Ed Butowsky’s legal filing, on Paragraph 57, tells us that Seymour Hersh told Butowsky that Hersh’s source for the Seth Rich story was ANDREW MCCABE, head of Counterintelligence at the FBI. That complicates things even more, since so many supporters of the Seth Rich story relied on Butowsky’s taping of Hersh’s revelations with the exceptions of:

          1. Seth Rich SOLD the emails to Wikileaks for the money. Most Seth Rich believers claim he did it because of Hillary cheating Bernie Sanders and was a great patriot because of the American flag suit he was photographed wearing once.

          2. Seth Rich was NOT murdered because he stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks.

          Those two parts of Seymour Hersh’s rendition of the Seth Rich story never seem to be included which is two bad because, in the case of Number 2, if Andrew McCabe told Hersh the emails were NOT the motive for the murder, what does that tell us? Have any idea?

          It tells us McCabe, if he is the source in the end, KNOWS the motive for the murder. If he knows it was not the emails, McCabe MUST know what the motive WAS for the murder. He must have had one or more suspects as a result of knowing the motive, but that is another story.

          Anyway, what can be done to turn this thing around? Whenever we can, we must challenge all weaknesses that can be found in the Crowdstrike report and documents flowing from the report. Among these are:

          1. Why did Crowdstrike just watch on their computer screens for 36 days while “Russian hackers” stole all the emails? This is not in keeping with Best Practices in Incident Response for data breaches.

          2. If Crowdstrike waited 36 days so as to not tip off the “Russians” that they had been detected, so that the “Russians” would not delete evidence of their crime from the system logs, why didn’t Crowdstrike just copy the system logs and store them off-Network? The logs argument was Michael Sussmann’s argument to the NEW YORK TIMES. Sussmann works with PERKINS COIE.

          3. If Crowdstrike waited 36 days because “the DNC” told them to wait until after the primaries were over to get the “Russians” off the network as Donna Brazile wrote in HACKS, who gave this STAND DOWN ORDER? If it was Hillary, that would be very damaging to the official story.

          4. Why were all the damaging emails written and received after Crowdstrike got on the network?

          5. Why was two-thirds of the malware allegedly used by the Fancy Bear hacking group who allegedly stole the emails NOT COMPILED until after Crowdstrike was on the network?

          6. Why did Crowdstrike executives and DNC executives tell Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post, on June 13, 2016, that the emails were only “read and monitored” by the “Russian hackers,” and theft of the emails was never mentioned? Why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz tell Nakashima that donor information was not even ACCESSED by the “Russian hackers” when Guccifer 2.0, accused of being a Russian hacker, but never apprehended by law enforcement in order to prove it, published donor information on-line on June 15, 2016?

          7. A significant effort was made by Nakashima to explain why the “Russians” only took TWO FILES OF OPPOSITION RESEARCH about Donald Trump, including interviewing outside experts about Russia, yet now we are told the “Russians” stole everything under the sun on that network. Why did the DNC and Crowdstrike executives mislead Ellen Nakashima about what happened? Did they lie, or is the software used by Crowdstrike ineffective, making it impossible for them to tell when emails are stolen, making them unaware of what actually happened? If their software does not work as they claim, how can we believe their report?

          There’s lots more about the FBI’s lack of response that we can get to later, but there is lots to attack here without dealing with producing the “real thief,” if that is what Seth Rich is in that story.

          Liked by 1 person

      • nobodyspecial1958 says:

        I believe Seth Rich did do it. My understanding is that the download speeds could not have been achieved wirelessly. If true then it would have to have been someone with access. It could have been someone else that then killed him as a diversion, or it could have been him. Or it could have been someone else. I think he is the most likely suspect. A Russian server would have no role in the theft if the download speed was too high. That could be a CrowdStrike cover ploy.

        Like

        • farrier105 says:

          The download tested took place on July 5, 2016. The emails were stolen on May 23, 2016 and May 25, 2016. I don’t know what the download speeds were. If Crowdstrike says Russia did July 5 download, and they are way off, that bites into their credibility, but has nothing to do with the theft of the emails given to Wikileaks.

          Besides, you have to prove who used the flashdrive once you prove that was what was used on July 5th. It does not HAVE to be Seth Rich, but must be proven to be him.

          Like

          • nobodyspecial1958 says:

            I don’t know anything except things ive read but it seems that CrowdStrike was involved in a ruse to make it look like Russians hacked into a Ukrainian anti aircraft battery and shot down a civilian airliner. Supposedly that is fact. It is surmised that they may have done the same thing r/e the dnc servers. Time will tell.

            Like

            • farrier105 says:

              Again, anything that undermines the credibility of Crowdstrike’s “expertise” can help in re-opening the investigation. Those are the subjects that need emphasized and there are many of them.

              Like

          • nobodyspecial1958 says:

            I agree about proof but the purpose of the ruse is to prevent scrutiny. If looked at, I think it can be established who did it. Rich or whoever.

            Like

            • farrier105 says:

              There’s a lot of work to be done to get there. There was a leased server inside the United States that allegedly the “Russian hackers” used in their operations. Supposedly, these
              “hackers” installed a keylogger on a DNC system which stored the results of the keylogger on this US server the GRU agents allegedly leased. The keylogger logged the Russians’ keystrokes along with the Democrats, and THAT server was seized. It is strange that hackers, who are alleged to be intelligence agents, would do something that stupid, but both the Republicans (including Nunes) and the Democrats believe this is what happened. Before you can get any of this investigated formally, this kind of evidence has to be challenged.

              Like

  16. Deplore Able says:

    Mayor Rudy, you are one magnificent bastard. You love this country. You know your destiny. Do not fail us. Fight the good fight. The truth will prevail. History treats you kindly. Like Joshua Chamberlain, charge!

    Liked by 5 people

  17. Dutchman says:

    Rudy, on National T.V., did something we have long known, something Rush has no doubt said, but this is, I SUSPECT, the first time on a talking head show.

    He linked the corruption of Biden in Ukraine and China, the corruption of Hillary/Clinton foundation World wide, to OBAMA.

    THIS is HISTORIC, and had Martha sputtering, as much as anything!

    The 800 lb. Gorilla, that NOBODY in msm has been saying.

    Now, its OUT there, in plain view. The “great Black hope”, the 1/2 black, 1/2 white “Mr. Untouchable” has been TOUCHED.

    This IS, I think an historic rubicon, a benchmark, a turning point. Often, in warfare, its only the historians looking back, that can identify a turning point, but THIS just may be one!

    This is living History, and its FASCINATING!

    Liked by 12 people

    • underwhelmingposter says:

      Glenn Beck’s 2 hour outside the paywall treatment of this was interesting. He also points to Obama. He considers Biden incidental to the entirety of the corruption and a central figure. The recent phone call w/Ukraine by PDJT was another feint by the Dems. Again Glenn stated that call was also a non-issue except for the Dems trying to magnify it to their own ends, as cover for that last 5 years of absolute Dem corruption regarding Ukraine.
      He was trying to make it simple but is was not. And probably cannot be made simple. But noone in the media is looking at the real corruption. Glenn basically look at what the Dems accused PGJT of doing with Russia was the exact playbook they were operating from regarding Ukraine. And no one is looking at it.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Dutchman says:

        Don’t know about Beck, but agree Biden IS ‘incidental’. The OBAMA admin corruption operation is being exposed.
        Chicago politics applied to National government.
        First, corrupt police, prosecutors and Judges, so you won’t be concerned with law enforcement for your crimes.
        Even USE same LE, prosecutors and Judges, against any who oppose you.
        Applied to Fed Gov., thats FBI/CIA, and DOJ and Judges.
        But, theres those pesky Republicons in Congress, who could ALSO cause problems!

        So, corrupt THEM as well. By blackmail, or corruption put them in a situation where they cover up YOUR crimes, because,THEY are,complicit.
        Having eliminated ANY “checks” on your behavior, send your bag lady around the world, to extort the cash.

        Hillary logged more,air miles than any Sec. Of State. Why? Cause you can’t extort bribes/pay for play over the phone; you need to do it face to face.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Please take the time to view the special on the Ukraine where Glenn Beck has differently connected the dots. Beck was on point with a lot of true facts on how the Obama Adm. was involved in the corruption and he shows how the US lost $1.8 billion dollars that went into Hunter Biden’s bank account. Beck posted his special on YouTube.

        Like

      • amjean says:

        So, pray tell, who is Glenn giving teddy bears to?

        Like

    • Rhi says:

      Yep, he went there. Rudy touched the untouchable, tied the whole swamps corruption together and by implication even the republicons involved in the rape and pillage of America and the exfiltration of her wealth.
      The President said “WAR”. He also said “I’d bomb the shit outta them”. I think his jaw is set, his fists are clenched and it’s about to get real.

      Liked by 5 people

      • Dutchman says:

        Yes, and while Rudy touched the untouchable (Obama), he is just working his way up to Republicons, but I agree he WILL go there, and THIS will, before we are done.

        Graham and Mcstain were McConnells bag men, just like Hillary was for Dems.

        We have reached the tipping point, its ALL coming out now, gravity has kicked in, and the tree us coming down. Nothing can stop it, now!

        I also really wonder, if the person who told the whistleblower about the,Ukraine call,….wasn’t doing exactly what,PDJT told them to do?

        WHAT a massive troll, if thats the,case!

        Liked by 6 people

        • Hillary started much of this for her own political advantage . ‘Bad Biden and Kid In Ukraine’ prior to her 2016 run. No different than HER ‘Where Was This Obama Guy Born ?’ question in 2006-7 prior to that run. Hillary is great at sparking fires that are blamed on others. What was the name of that movie??

          Like

        • Peppurr says:

          Thanks Dutchman. Definitely some hand-wringing going on now with both Dems and the ‘Cons.. Although I am totally supportive for about what should come out, I have to admit I’m a little nervous with respect to the safety of Guilliani and President Trump. This is war.

          Like

          • Dutchman says:

            Me, too. Many of us are. However, one of the first things I heard about President Trump, once in office, was how he brought in his OWN security, and had a major shake up of Secret Service.
            He IS aware. So, theres that, and trust GOD.
            Beyond that, ‘worrying’doesn’t accomplish anything, so PRAY, and do whatever you can to further MAGA agenda, and PDJT.

            Its what we CAN do.

            Liked by 1 person

    • margarite1 says:

      I’m not a racist – blacks and half blacks can be just as corrupt as whites. They should all be punished exactly the same – melanin is no excuse.

      Like

      • Dutchman says:

        Oh, I very much agree. But the liberals USED his race, to MAKE him ‘untouchable’ for so long, THATS the point.

        By making ANY criticism about Obamas POLICIES, as being about his RACE, it meant he could do,…ANYTHING.

        Ship guns to Mexican cartels, or supply manpads to Taliban,..pallets of cash to Iran, ANYTHING.

        Liked by 1 person

  18. mtk says:

    All I know, is with Rudy’s history…
    Is he is a straight shooter, you will always know where he stands. He is not wishy washy

    His politics from years of observation of living in NYS, is he is a liberal/libertarian republican. He gets the workings of the State from a media stand point that lends its weight as a de jour preception.
    I believe he truely understands the deverse human value, from all walks of life. He does not have a mean bone against anyone. He is a truth seeker.

    And pardon this following discription RUDY.

    I believe ourside the non PC culture, he truely gets it.
    He is the most loyal of dogs, and not just for all of us.
    He is motivated by unfairness, a dog that knows unfair treatment.

    So I ask all… Who the heck would you want in your corner…(It is a long list and one that is NOT exclusively exhausted)

    A diamond in the rough or a polished image.
    A bull dog or a fair weather candlestick…
    An unabashed truth seeker, or a tester of the wind.
    Someone that avoids/measures controversies/spin, or someone that takes a stand without consideration of the political reprocompressions.
    (And has a tract record of putting himself preceively in such situations and coming out one top)
    Someone that will throw it back in you face or someone that will not face the spun challenges and seek safety.

    That is the Rudy of NYC I know.

    Please note, the MSM is avoiding the many avenues of character attacks against Rudy that where long standingly played out in NYS media before he started to represent the President.
    Why is that?
    One would tend to think is because he ate their lunches, when it was tried.

    I write this these things on a National Stage, because RUDY is tough and does NOT suffer fools for long.
    It is his track record long before 2016, and no one wan’t say otherwise.
    I trust him to be fair and open minded, until he finds out that is not the case, then it is all bets are off and that is when he will beat you over the head with your(understood) fairness.
    He does not play games, that is my long standing impression of the public Rudy from my time in NYS.

    Liked by 8 people

  19. Red Mosquito says:

    McCallum is full on Obama Admin apologist

    Liked by 2 people

    • YvonneMarie says:

      She is an ass.
      Greta was much more palpable.

      Liked by 4 people

      • FPCHmom says:

        As much as I hated Megan Kelly, at least she was smart. Martha has always seemed a bit slow to me. Not that I watch Fox News at all anymore, but I used to, a lot.

        Liked by 2 people

        • GB Bari says:

          MeAgain Kelly was smart? FPCHmom, I have to disagree with you on that.

          When Kelly attacked then-candidate Trump by her presumptive, exaggerated sexist question in the Aug 2015 presidential debate, she outed herself as a self-obsessed moron who lacked any foresight to understand both the breadth of support behind DJT and the fact that she worked for the one news network watched by most of Trumps supporters.

          It was no surprise that her career went rapidly down the toilet after that.

          MeAgain Kelly is NOT smart. If she was, she’d still be with Fox and have one of the most watched programs. But she chose to not be bold and tenacious in search for truth. She chose to simply echo the MSMs narratives. Dime a dozen.

          Liked by 1 person

  20. myrightpenguin says:

    Rudy is doing a great job, but he is also serving as a lightning rod to allow Barr and Durham to do their thing. Barr/Durham had better deliver!

    Liked by 5 people

    • teeheeman says:

      Great observation – Barr/Durham are in the background gettin’ ‘er done. Someboday asked me today why this is taking so long. As the Dude says, “new s**t has come to light”

      Liked by 1 person

  21. omyword says:

    She is spinning her behind off covering for the dirt bags. Sick of faux spews! Rip it up and trash it along with PMSNBC and CNN and all the other alphabyteme spews orgs. We better news here by far!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sherri Young says:

      It would have been great if she would have pulled out her earpiece and actually interviewed Rudy. It would have been her last interview on a national television news show, but it would have burned up the internet. People could have suddenly seen that the talking heads such as Martha are talking heads.

      Just another presstitute.

      Like

  22. teeheeman says:

    RUDY ON FIRE!!! Man on a mission? Indeed….

    Liked by 2 people

  23. gvillewill says:

    Rudy should have asked to see Martha’s voter registration card?

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Southern Trumpette says:

    Fox has really gone over to the Dark Side.

    Like

    • pocaMAGAjunta says:

      Fox was always faux in the sense that the expectations of many viewers has been that if the truth, or an approximate version, is being presented, then actions will be taken in response to the truth. Those aware that the MSM was always misleading, have been pacified by the alternate news source. A more accurate Fox claim would be “We report, then nothing happens”.

      Fox is akin to the “fake outrage trap” reporting by the MSM as indentified by Sundance.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. john says:

    Not a fan of Martha. At all.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Danimal28 says:

    WOW. Martha’s swamp protector powers are really being exposed. Murdochs boys are really starting to take over Fox in their establishment liberal view. No wonder Brennan is indirectly, publicly threatening Rudy – THEY ARE SCARED. Good. F*ck the swamp.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. John-Y128 says:

    I’m glad Rudy made it onto last Sunday’s MSM news shows, it’s a safe bet it wont happen again.

    Like

  28. TradeBait says:

    I know failure in an industry can lead to competitors taking their market. So when does that occur in television media? The internet has replaced print media and conservatives control talk radio. OANN exists to some degree for television, but is not available everywhere and not in the big leagues as a presentation. There is a great opportunity for some forward thinking conservative media moguls to replace Fox News, which is controlled by globalists anyway. I never watch FNC any more and just a couple on FBN.

    Like

    • GB Bari says:

      Totally agree with your post.
      OANN is by far the most objective and fair, but still a bit unpolished in presentation and production. They need more variety of programs and more topics of news reports before repeating ones they already presented.
      They need a few more on-air program hosts.
      They’re starting to get some interesting guests for interviews, and if they keep increasing those numbers while vetting potential guests to not be political hacks, they will improve viewership.

      Like

  29. We the people know says:

    Follow the money, I mean gold…

    Ukraine admits its gold is gone
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-18/ukraine-admits-its-gold-gone

    Who Stole 143 Tons of Gold from the Libyan People?
    https://awesomeprophecy.com/flashback-libyas-gold-reserves-of-100-tons-have-been-stolen-by-bankers/

    Liked by 2 people

  30. StanH says:

    That was awesome. Rudy further confirms the President knows what we know and then some. This is why the uniparty has been so freaked out since the escalator ride. Trillions are at stake.

    Keep in mind many of the swamp weasels in the press have kids and family members working somewhere in the swamp, K-Street, Think Tanks, Wall Street, you name it. And are just as frightened that their culpability in the coup will be exposed. And don’t you know deep state has the goods on them as well, perhaps the Lolita Express. .

    The entire swamp is corrupt, bet on it. Keep away from the MSM, they lie.

    Like

  31. I strongly believe that Rommey been corrtupt Ukraine Deal to with porpaganda Democeats,
    I hope that looking in to more detail about Rommey,

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Zippy says:

    True, they are covering up massive corruption. So, why isn’t the DOJ investigating based on the loads of incriminating info in these years-old books?:

    Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich Hardcover – May 5, 2015

    Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends Hardcover – March 20, 2018

    Probably for a similar reason to why they didn’t LONG AGO kneecap the Russian collusion farce through targeted interviews of key individuals involved, LIKE MIFSUD, the investigative work and flowchart already laid out FOR THEM in books: even Trump’s so-called “allies” in the three letter agencies AREN’T. Why? Because to truly root out lies and corruption a bunch of “Republicans” would go down, too. The same reason this biggest of all times CONgressional scandal was covered up:

    Obstruction of Justice: How the Deep State Risked National Security to Protect the Democrats Hardcover – January 29, 2019

    It’s like something out of a spy novel: In the heat of the 2016 election, an unvetted Pakistani national with a proclivity for blackmail gained access to the computer files of one in five Democrats in the House of Representatives. He and his family lifted data off the House network, stole the identity of an intelligence specialist, and sent congressional electronic equipment to foreign officials. And that was only the beginning.

    Rather than protect national security, Congress and the Justice Department schemed to cover up a politically inconvenient hack and an underlying fraud on Capitol Hill involving dozens of Democrats’ offices. Evidence disappeared, witnesses were threatened, and the supposed watchdogs in the media turned a blind eye.

    Combining tenacious investigative reporting and high-tech investigative techniques, Luke Rosiak began ferreting out the truth, and found himself face to face with the “Deep State,” observing how Nancy Pelosi’s Democrats manipulated the Department of Justice, the media, and ****** even Republican leadership to sabotage the investigation into what Newt Gingrich calls possibly the biggest congressional scandal in history. ******

    Liked by 3 people

    • Esperanza says:

      When Lurch’s stepson is bailing because the money mill stinks too much, you’d be better looking twice.

      There’s an anecdote with Louis XIV and St Simon I think. St Simon walks in to the king playing cards and a heavy atmosphere. The king says “St Simon, they suspect I cheated”. “Sire” He replied “had they only /i/suspected you /i/, they would have been pleased to give you the levée”

      Since all of this is open and above board, it will be easy for Baby Sleepy to prove what he did to earn more than half a million dollars.

      Like

  33. HellInAHandbasket says:

    The President is the real Whistleblower here.

    Liked by 3 people

  34. ARW says:

    I firmly believe Joe Biden entered the presidential race to protect himself from investigation. He announced right after Rudy transmitted his information to State. I think Hunter joined the campaign trail for the same reason.

    Which means the current impeachment narrative has been planned since April/May.

    I also don’t trust Volker due to his pushing Ukraine on Trump, history with McCain, and his crazy defense of Biden in his statement.

    Liked by 1 person

    • StanH says:

      That’s why the Hildabeast is considering jumping in as well. They are desperately trying to make and ocean of corruption look like political “dirty tricks” on the part of President Trump. A predictable play by the swamp. And be certain the MSM will do their part to prop up the con.

      Be prepared folks.

      Liked by 2 people

      • amjean says:

        I suspect Hillary is not now considering jumping in the presidential race. From the day after she got over losing the 2016 race, after her drunken rages and screaming fits, she and her minions have been setting the stage for her to enter the
        race as the centrist, alone among the radicals running.

        Like

        • amjean says:

          ..and of course, we know she actually hasn’t gotten over it which will make her
          particularly cunning and vicious this go around.

          Like

        • Judith says:

          I thought it would be Bloomberg entering the 2020 race, as the Dimmie’s version of an astute and successful billionaire businessman. Little do the NPC’s know he is in fact a globalist who would (and has) sold out us deplorable peasants in a New York minute.

          Like

  35. thomas says:

    Where are you Lindsey..?????, Mr. all talk no show…? . There’s no doubt in my mind he was part of the Russia nonsense,someone has serious dirt on him or he’s a fraud or all the above..?? Primary Lindsey, Mitch,Mittens, the list on and on and on…. Maybe what it will take is 10 or 20 million of us going to washington..?

    Like

  36. The Gipper Lives says:

    Don’t go Goldilocks on Rudy because he’s not doing it juuuust right, Martha. He’s doing the investigations that FoxNews refused to do. If you people had done your jobs, he wouldn’t even be in your studios this morning. Did you ever think of that?

    For instance, Fox generally treated the Mueller Fraud like it was real instead of a bunch of failed fixers sitting around for a couple of years trying to bait the president into something they could call “Obstruction”. Fox has lots of firepower but stupidly focuses on the Endless Horse Race. The other networks created Fox by failing to tell it straight. Fox will create their own replacement, too, if they continue.

    Fox is a big place. There are CNN rejects like Shemp and Night Court Nap and there are solid reporters like Jarrett and others. Bartiromo has been a rock star–but it looked like Paul Ryan was whispering in her headset recently. Stay true, Maria, Integrity will never go out of style.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. thomas says:

    This comment is awaiting moderation…?? Really so now we on the right are speech police also..? Every opinion should be allowed no matter how ridiculous..

    Like

  38. Lactantius says:

    Martha is the cake in the store window that looks like perfection but is merely a demonstration model.

    She is OK for the general flow and for asking some questions. But she could never, ever be a match for Giuliani. Rudy is a smart, well oiled Type A who knows his turf and gets his man. So ask yourself, what has Martha got in her bag of tricks that would be an effective way to reach inside of the Rudy armor and shake him up?

    They all resort to shouting and cutting their guest off and hammering at imaginary nails and focusing on not letting the interviewee speak. Strange. They bring Giuliani on just to try to shut him up. That is Olympic level dumb.

    Giuliani is Trump’s personal lawyer. Now is that Trump the man or Trump the President ? Of course, it is Trump the man. Trump the man has deep, deep pockets and he can pay Giuliani for a very long time. Giuliani s a very rich man. Rich enough to be doing this for sport. What ever the arrangement may be, it is covered by lawyer-client privilege. Just like Obama and his handler Valerie.

    Of course the mindlessness of the media thinks that “transparency” means that President Trump must be the only president required to wear a wire 24/7 and be televised 24/7 so that he can be impeached for picking his nose.

    Giuliani and his team have got the goods on this Ukraine corruption and they are ready to throw it wide open. Poor Martha is stuck on whether “propriety” has been bruised and little toes stepped upon.

    Here’s why Martha doesn’t get it: Giuliani could have been a terrific mob boss. The mob taught him how to think like a mobster. Corrupt-o-crats are all the same and once you take them and their methods seriously, they are fairly easy to figure out and nail. Does anyone with half a brain believe that good old Joe Biden and his lame son were first rate Corrupt-o-crat geniuses?

    Poor Martha just doesn’t understand tornadoes. She is naive enough to try to talk it down. Giuliani ate her lunch, her dinner and drove home in her car and she can’t figure out what happened.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. gueppebarre says:

    Martha, Martha, Martha… you obviously don’t want to hear these allegations, so why do the interview? She must be taking lessons from Sean Hannity on interrupting interviewees – but more importantly, she doesn’t want the audience to hear ANY of this. The press has its Swamp narrative, and this is the only allowable conversation. Pathetic, corrupt, and anti-American. The swamp draining needs to include all of these democrat operatives posing as news people, and Blondie here is one of that pack of skunks!

    Like

  40. Donzo says:

    I’ve often found Rudy to be less than effective in interviews as much as I like him. This interview is Rudy channeling PDT. He’s telling the story and pulling no punches, even showing disgust at Martha for her pathetic exercise in attempting to be an honest news person.Perhaps he needs a disbelieving interviewer to bring out his best qualities.

    Like

  41. GP says:

    I just can’t watch Martha or any of the others anymore-I got less than 2 minutes into the video and had to stop.

    Like

  42. Right to reply says:

    We need to know more about Soros’s involvement. His dual passport should be shredded!

    Like

    • Sherri Young says:

      Does he even have a 2nd passport?

      I’d like to see the color of his US passport cover. I’d like to know if he travels on a black passport. #Speculation

      Like

  43. Right to reply says:

    Time for broadcasting licenses to be issued under different categories. CNN is not news, its personal opinion and propaganda, same as all the others. The only one that stands out as REAL news, is OAN. If they don’t report genuine REAL news, they should not be allowed to use NEWS in their titles/names/trade marks. Its like putting sausages in a can and selling them as beans.

    Liked by 2 people

  44. Gradyman says:

    Go Rudy!! Time to reveal the truth!!

    Like

  45. islandpalmtrees says:

    Something for Rudi

    Liked by 1 person

  46. willyeye says:

    Maybe Barr should appoint Rudy as a Special Counsel to investigate Democrat/liberal media corruption.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. islandpalmtrees says:

    It’s Working Rudi!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Skippy says:

      Those with hubris are often willing to take dangerous risks. For former VP Biden to angrily deflect this pertinent question regarding son’s Ukraine’s conflict of interest seems an example. But then I saw, heard and read lots of illogical elitist remarks from President Obama himself. Such as, paraphrasing, “American people don’t know their geography” (wrong). Like republicans cling to their “Bible and guns” casting aspersions seemingly to our Constitutional religious freedom (1st amendment), and gun right (2nd amendment)-this from a constitutional lawyer-president.

      Like

  48. islandpalmtrees says:

    Rudy Giuliani was investigating Ukraine while Mueller was wasting his time trying to fine something president Trump had done wrong. Brilliant!

    The impeachment hoax by the Socialist Democrats is another waste of time while we wait on the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz OIG FISA Report.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s