Maria Bartiromo Outlines The Architect of “Spygate” and “Crossfire Hurricane”, CIA Director John Brennan…

Among all media personalities Maria Bartiromo easily has the most comprehensive grasp of the 2016 operation against President Trump.  During two interviews today Bartiromo outlines the evidence that leads directly to the person at the origination point, former CIA Director John Brennan.

First, here’s a mash-up of the two interviews (Senator Graham and John Solomon) where Bartiromo asks the same question.  [hat tip Michael Sheridan for the video]

.

Former CIA Director John Brennan lies at the heart of the intelligence community decision to weaponize against Donald Trump. In this outline I will provide supporting evidence for Bartiromo’s assertion, which I suspect has already led to a criminal referral to U.S. Attorney John Durham by HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes.

Suspicious Cat ate canary…

The FBI’s formal origination of the counterintelligence investigation into candidate Donald Trump known as “Operation Crossfire Hurricane”, begins with a two-page memo submitted by former CIA Director John Brennan to former FBI Director James Comey.

The two page origination memo is known as an “EC” or “electronic communication”. This classified origination memo is one of the key documents requested by congress for declassification by President Trump, to be shared with the American people.

According to House Intelligence Committee member Devin Nunes; who is also a member of the intelligence oversight ‘Gang-of-Eight’; that EC contains intelligence material that did not come through “official intelligence channels” into the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

On April 22nd, 2018, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes appeared on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the origin of the July 2016 counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign.

WATCH the first two minutes:

.

The origin of the 2016 counterintelligence operation was the Electronic Communication document, a ‘raw intelligence product’ delivered by CIA Director John Brennan to the FBI.

The EC was not an official product of the U.S. intelligence community. Additionally, Brennan was NOT using official partnerships with intelligence agencies of our Five-Eyes partner nations; and he did not provide raw intelligence –as an outcome of those relationships– to the FBI.

When we first watched this interview the initial questions were: if the EC is not based on official intelligence from U.S. intelligence apparatus or any of the ‘five-eyes’ partners, then what is the origin, source and purpose therein, of the unofficial raw intelligence? Who created it? And why?

Now we know many of the answers to those questions.

All research indicates CIA Director John Brennan enlisted the help of U.S. and foreign intelligence assets to run operations against the Trump campaign early in 2016. The objective was to give the false and manufactured appearance of compromise. Once the CIA established the possibility of compromise, that activity created the EC which opened the door for an FBI investigation.

The operation run by Brennan targeting Papadopoulos is at the center of the two-page “EC” (electronic communication); given to FBI Director James Comey to start the counterintelligence operation (Crossfire Hurricane) against the Trump campaign.

Two of the intelligence assets Brennan organized were Joseph Mifsud and Stefan Halper.

Yes, the primary intelligence sources of John Brennan’s “EC” is were operations run by FBI and CIA operative Stefan Halper, and western intelligence asset Joseph Mifsud.  A great background on Halper is HERE.

In March 2018 Chuck Ross of The Daily Caller took a deep dive on how Stefan Halper interacted with George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. Halper is sketchy, and he was trying to initiate contacts with low-level Trump campaign aides. [SEE HERE]

DAILY CALLER – Two months before the 2016 election, George Papadopoulos received a strange request for a meeting in London, one of several the young Trump adviser would be offered — and he would accept — during the presidential campaign.

The meeting request, which has not been reported until now, came from Stefan Halper, a foreign policy expert and Cambridge professor with connections to the CIA and its British counterpart, MI6.

Halper’s September 2016 outreach to Papadopoulos wasn’t his only contact with Trump campaign members. The 73-year-old professor, a veteran of three Republican administrations, met with two other campaign advisers, The Daily Caller News Foundation learned. (Please Keep Reading)

We now know Brennan’s originating structure involved Stefan Halper the foreign policy expert and Cambridge professor deeply connected to the CIA and willing to run the operation to benefit the political objective for CIA Director Brennan. This is how John Brennan originates the “EC” through non-traditional intelligence channels. The EC is then given to James Comey, who starts Operation Crossfire Hurricane on July 31st, 2016.

[NOTE: •On July 31st, 2016 the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign. They did not inform congress until March 2017. •At the beginning of August (1st-3rd) 2016 FBI Agent Peter Strzok traveled to London, England for interviews with UK intelligence officials. •On August 15th, 2016 Peter Strzok sends a text message to DOJ Lawyer Lisa Page describing the “insurance policy“, needed in case Hillary Clinton were to lose the election. That’s where Carter Page comes in.]

However, CIA Director John Brennan didn’t stop with simply originating the FBI investigation, he went on to promote additional material from his knowledge of the Christopher Steele Dossier.

This is the part that John Brennan has denied; however, the evidence proving his lies is overwhelming.

We start by remembering the sworn testimony of John Brennan to congress on May 23rd, 2017. Listen carefully to the opening statement from former CIA Director John Brennan and pay close attention to the segment at 13:35 of this video [transcribed below]:

Brennan: [13:35] “Third, through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”

“Again, in consultation with the White House, I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”

“Given the highly sensitive nature of what was an active counter-intelligence case [that means the FBI], involving an ongoing Russian effort, to interfere in our presidential election, the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…

Notice a few things from this testimony. First, where Brennan says “in consultation with the White House“. This is a direct connection between Brennan’s activity and President Obama, National Security Adviser Susan Rice and Chief-of-Staff Denis McDonough, each of whom would have held knowledge of what Brennan was briefing to the Go8.

Secondly, Brennan is describing raw intelligence (obviously gathered prior to the Carter Page FISA Application/Warrant – October 21st, 2016) that he went on to brief the Gang-of-Eight (pictured below). Notice Brennan said he did briefings “individually”.

Brennan also says in his testimony that he began the briefings on August 11th, 2016. This is a key point because former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid sent a letter to James Comey on August 27th, 2016, as an outcome of his briefing by John Brennan. But it is the content of Reid’s letter that really matters.

In the last paragraph of Reid’s letter to Comey he notes something that is only cited within the Christopher Steele Dossier [full letter pdf here]:

This letter is August 27th, 2016. The Trump advisor in the letter is Carter Page. The source of the information is Christopher Steele in his dossier. Two months later (October 21st, 2016) the FBI filed a FISA application against Carter Page using the Steele Dossier.

So what we are seeing here is CIA Director John Brennan briefing Harry Reid on the Steele dossier in August 2016, even before the dossier reached the FBI. However, John Brennan has denied seeing the dossier until December of 2016. A transparent lie.

Brennan goes on to testify the main substance of those 2016 Go8 briefings was the same as the main judgements of the January 2017 classified and unclassified intelligence assessments published by the CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA, ie. “The Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA).

However, we know Brennan put material from the Dossier into the ICA.

We also know from Paul Sperry: “[…] A source close to the House investigation said Brennan himself selected the CIA and FBI analysts who worked on the ICA, and that they included former FBI counterespionage chief Peter Strzok. “Strzok was the intermediary between Brennan and [former FBI Director James] Comey, and he was one of the authors of the ICA,” according to the source.” (link)

Summary so far: During a period early in 2016 CIA Director John Brennan manufactured the material needed to start the FBI investigation on July 31st, 2016. John Brennan also received information from within the Steele Dossier which he put into President Obama’s Daily Briefing and shared with the Gang of Eight.

Here’s where it gets even more interesting.

On December 15, 2016, Strzok and Page texted each other about a sister organization leaking to the mainstream media. The next day, December 16, Strzok texted Page again, this time to discuss an article in The Washington Post: “FBI in agreement with CIA that Russia aimed to help Trump win White House”, where Strzok argued that the Central Intelligence Agency is more capable of manipulating the press and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had the initial position, not the Central Intelligence Agency…

So it would seem that Brennan was leaking to the media and pushing hard on this same Russia narrative during the transition period. It’s almost bizarre to see Brennan now saying “perhaps he had bad information”… BRENNAN IS THE INFORMATION !!

Fucking Brennan.

Additionally, if you want to throw on an even more stunning layer upon this manipulation matrix, consider that Nellie Ohr was likely working for the CIA.

“I read an article in the paper that mentioned Glenn Simpson. And I remembered because he had been a Wall Street Journal reporter working on things like Russian crime and corruption, so I recognized the name. I was underemployed at that time and I was looking for opportunities.

~ Nellie Ohr via congressional testimony

If Nellie Ohr, a known CIA open source contractor, sought out Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS for the job in 2015, not vice-versa, then it would appear a sting operation from within the CIA (John Brennan) was underway and long planned. The evidence of this likelihood surfaces later from Brennan’s knowledge of the specific intelligence within the Steele Dossier as shared with Obama and briefed to Harry Reid in August 2016.

So let us recap:

♦In the first phase of this operation the CIA, likely Brennan, seeded Fusion GPS with information via Nellie Ohr. After it became clear that Donald Trump would be the 2016 GOP candidate, that information was then piped-into another Fusion GPS contractor and former FBI Source, Chris Steele. Steele then “laundered”, and returned the Ohr research material into an official intelligence product to the FBI. [The tool was Carter Page.]

♦Concurrently timed with the start of this first phase, Brennan was running an operation using Stephan Halper and Joseph Mifsud to generate the “EC” and initiate the FBI to begin a counterintelligence operation named Crossfire Hurricane. [The tool was George Papadopoulos]

This is why the media got/get somewhat confused with the origins of everything: Papadopoulous (Crossfire Hurricane) -vs- Carter Page (dossier into FISA); an origination confusion which still exists through today.

In essence we can see that John Brennan was the initiator manipulating everything, somewhat behind the scenes, for all of the activity (tangentially noted by Peter Strzok and Lisa Page in their text messages about the CIA leaks). After the 2016 election, Brennan continued pushing the Steele Dossier into the media bloodstream as it carried the Russian Conspiracy virus he created.

During the time James Comey’s FBI was running operation Crossfire Hurricane, Comey admitted he intentionally never informed congressional oversight: “because of the sensitivity of the matter“. I suspect he knew there was manipulation behind the events that initiated the construct; he was, however, willfully blind to it.

When Brennan now says in hindsight he might have received “bad information“, it’s laughable – because the information is his creation.

Now with all of that hindsight in mind, watch the first four minutes of this interview and pay attention to the duping delight:

.

Lastly, unlike other DOJ and FBI officials connected to the fraudulent exploitation of the FISA court, John Brennan is not attached to the ongoing DOJ Inspector General investigation being conducted by IG Horowitz.

Presumably Inspector General Michael Horowitz is only looking at the process, procedures and people who were involved in submitting an unverified and likely fraudulent FISA application.  Though his investigation would mean reviewing the underlying evidence for the FISA warrant, ie. the Steele Dossier, the list of IG targets does not necessarily include anyone outside the DOJ and FBI process.

This could mean former CIA Director John Brennan, or any other Obama-era official outside the DOJ and FBI, could be referred for criminal investigation to John Durham; and investigation or review of that referral should not impede any ongoing investigation by IG Michael Horowitz.

That’s why it is possible for Devin Nunes to have submitted a ¹criminal referral for John Brennan; which would be one of the primary aspects of review by Durham (noted by Solomon), and only tangentially connected to the IG Horowitz investigation.

¹Or, NSA Advisor Susan Rice, ODNI James Clapper, or former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power (unmasking); or any other administration official who may have engaged in leaking and/or disseminating classified intelligence information.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

292 Responses to Maria Bartiromo Outlines The Architect of “Spygate” and “Crossfire Hurricane”, CIA Director John Brennan…

  1. CopperTop says:

    Still a few questions: Why go after Trump in early 2016 if they thought Hillary was a lock? It’s nearly certain that this started with Brennan. What does he/CIA gain by having a Russia conspiracy operation running unless it’s on the behalf of the HRC’s administrations future state craft? What’s in the public sourcing to hint at those details? Ukraine policy? Iran/Isis???

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hillary has known she’s a phony, an incompetent and inadequate on multiple levels for decades.

      Why did she orchestrate a bogus referral to the FBI regarding the White House Travel Office Staff in ‘93 when they could have been replaced legally without consequence?

      The woman is a sociopath just like her husband.,

      Liked by 19 people

      • Some old guy says:

        They may both be sociopaths but Bill looks better in a dress. 😉

        Liked by 16 people

      • TarsTarkas says:

        She had the Travel Office people investigated to justify their firing in favor of her cronies, to make them look like criminals who deserved to be jailed as well as fired. It’s a constant theme in her career, opponents or just ordinary people in her way made to appear to be evil crooks to hide her own actions. I’ve known people like that, they could be earning a billion bucks a year and still have an overwhelming need to chisel and defame others.

        Liked by 6 people

        • margarite1 says:

          Doing things like this to people made her feel powerful – something she has craved her entire life. I think it has something to do with her father….but I don’t care why…just that she would have loved to be in control of our lives. She really is a monster who was driven to go to the edge of insanity. I imagine she’s taken great pleasure in watching the trouble the deep state has inflicted on POTUS because it was never about the USA…it was all about her.

          Liked by 1 person

        • jim says:

          Scarimucchi (sp)

          Like

    • ALEX says:

      “Why go after Trump in early 2016 if they thought Hillary was a lock?

      It’s what they do…they used the NSA phone and email database as their own data mining operation and I personally believe this goes back to the Patriot Act.

      Mueller even had to enact the Woods procedures when they got caught just two years after the Patriot Act was passed….Bill Binney has called this out from the very beginning and it’s why he resigned.

      Liked by 15 people

    • I think they knew she was going to lose. They knew the polls were fake. One only had to look at the size of Trump’s crowds to see the inevitable.
      Hell they could have been listening to conversations of average Americans to know what was about to happen. Before 2016 I would have never believed our government would do this. I’ll believe anything is possible now.

      Liked by 32 people

      • peace says:

        at blind no longer – I think you are correct. Hillary and the rest knew she would lose – that’s why she cancelled the firework display 2 days before the election.

        Liked by 7 people

      • Patriot1783 says:

        I think deep state knew & were confident the fix was in and reason why Clinton never bothered to campaign. Remember she took most of August & September off. She didn’t even go to visit some states tho numbers reflected they could be close.
        Wasn’t til November when they were faced with the facts and started creating the dossier in hopes of recalling President Trump as the lawful winner or impeaching him.

        Liked by 1 person

      • farrier105 says:

        I used to think this, too, and still believe they knew she would lose. What they were trying to do was create enough violence in the streets and chaos over the “legitimacy” of the election that the election would be canceled, or the results deemed illegitimate and manufactured by a “hostile foreign power” and OBAMA WOULD BE RETAINED AS PRESIDENT. This fits with the information found in the hack of Deray McKesson’s cell phone and Twitter texts. Both parties conventions were targeted for violence and shut downs along with natinowide riots, with Obama stepping in to cancel the election, launch martial law, and stay in office.

        Because McKesson was hacked, they had to call an audible. They were going to either let Hillary lose, or help her lose with the cooked polls (Hillary votes would stay home) and the public second investigation of Hillary’s email scandal (the Weiner laptop). After Trump gets in, they start with sowing chaos, turning lose ANTIFA, and ginning up their Trump investigation to get Obama back by removing the Administration as illegitimate and “installed by Russia,” which explains John Kerry assuring Obama’s old partners in other countries that “Trump would be out in a year.”

        Martial law and a little Continuity of Government later, we have King Obama again. It is likely they are working on getting Michelle Obama as Democratic Party candidate, but we’ll see. Too much incompetent, ham-handed attempts to set up Trump ruined their Plan B, but they did polarize the public BIG TIME. Wholesale violence is simmering below the surface, and they keep it stoked.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Tl Howard says:

        She lost by a slim margin, very slim. Had she campaigned at all in WI she probably would have carried it by a slim margin. If intel suspected or “knew” she was going to lose, they had plenty of time to warn her.

        Frankly, I’ve always asked myself why they did what they did to Trump if they were convinced she would win unless they simply had fun doing it, which is entirely possible from these snakes.

        Like

        • Tl Howard says:

          The only think I can think of is that they knew Hillary was ill and likely to HAVE to take off time from campaigning and that fear might have given them good reason to go after Trump, just in case she did fall ill and lose.

          Like

        • margarite1 says:

          They had to have known she had health issues that could make voters wary…and besides the rally crowds had to scare them. Hillary knew Trump – he’s a force of nature. This was the “insurance policy”.

          Like

        • wightmanfarm says:

          If she had won WI, she still would have lost.

          Like

    • QCM says:

      Consider the probability that there were “investigations” opened into ALL of HRC’s opponents. The ones that dropped out of/lost were never needed to be used, therefore, they were never publicized and weaponized. Recall the 85% abuse rate at the FISA court stretching back to 2012. 2016 was not the first time, nor even second time, this strategy was implemented. She wasn’t supposed to lose.

      Liked by 20 people

    • sarasotosfan says:

      What did they have to gain? They would have had the Oval Office occupied by an individual the intelligence community had control of. Trump posed a serious threat because they had no control over him and he could expose them for the criminals they were, kind of like what is coming to pass.

      Liked by 3 people

    • JoeMeek says:

      They didn’t think Hillary was a lock. Pretty close to a lock, but they didn’t want to end up close but no cigar.

      Liked by 3 people

    • KnowSERENoFear says:

      Why go after Trump? I believe the political elite through Hillary were going to destroy Trump afterwards….they wanted him broke and in jail. All to send a message that outsiders had better never attempt to enter politics again.

      Liked by 13 people

    • GB Bari says:

      It’s how the immoral, unethical Deep State operates. They fabricated a case against DJT that would be publicized in the event his pre-election poll numbers rose to beat Hillary’s, or in the event he actually won, even though they may have thought Cankles was a shoe-in.

      Had Cankles won (perish the thought) the fabricated case would have been quietly shelved unless DJT threatened the Swamp in any way.

      IMO

      Liked by 2 people

      • dissonant1 says:

        Their timing was a bit off. Because of that, what was originally meant to be an “October Surprise” ended up being manipulated into a 3-year bogus investigation.

        Liked by 1 person

      • docnova66 says:

        Yes and no. Yes they fabricated the case against VSGPDJT just in case. However, if Killary had won as expected, I strongly suspect there was a multi-faceted case ready for use to ensure she followed the diktats of her Deep State enablers.

        Like

    • deplorable says:

      What did they have to gain? Maybe try turning the question around. What did they have to lose? If they could ensure Hillary would be elected, everything gets swept under the rug and buried.

      Liked by 1 person

    • They went after Trump because they knew that the polling was phony and that Trump had a really good chance of being elected.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sundance’s information is great, but you have to ask, what set Brennan off against Donald Trump — candidate and then President — in the first place? And when you ask that, it should be intuitively obvious to the casual observer that it was not, was NEVER, about Hillary; it was about Obama/Soetoro personally, and Islam secondarily. It is a gross mistake to try to focus upon any Cllinton as the origin of this. Hillary’s place with respect to Obama was made clear, to me at least, when she took the job of Secretary of State under him, and it was confirmed when she went along with the “anti-Muslim video” supposed explanation of the Benghazi attack. She willingly became a loyal underling of Obama, as everyone else who worked for him did; they all sold their souls to the devil in Obama. Obama was personally offended by Trump, as many have known and noted for years. No doubt Valerie Jarrett saw that Brennan was totally in the tank for Islam in America, and led Obama in targeting Trump from the beginning of Obama’s personal abuse of national intelligence.

      And aside from Obama’s personal and “save my legacy of transformation” motives, surely it should be obvious that Brennan — NONE of them — even COULD have abused their positions of power as they did, WITHOUT the complete knowledge and approval of Obama/Soetoro. “The Buck stops here (with the President)” is not just a nifty narrative; it is the stark truth.

      It is Obama who the deplorable Insane Left has to be made to see for the utter slime he is. Black Americans and “tingly” or “guilty” Whites put their political fortunes on precisely the wrong, false guy when they elected him, and then showed how lost they were in delusion when they re-elected him.

      Liked by 13 people

      • dissonant1 says:

        You’ve got some good points. But let’s not forget who funded Fusion GPS to dig up phony dirt on Trump. And Hillary would never sell her soul to someone else (assuming she has one). She has always has been dedicated entirely to her own welfare and no one else’s, and has done whatever she feels is to her own benefit. Obama and Hillary are both quite well wrapped up in this corrupt mess but I don’t think they were compatriots (that is, “soul mates.”) When Obama made her Secretary of State, they both made a deal with the devil.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Bryan Alexander says:

          Fusion GPS was needed for only 1 thing: Laundering information. They couldn’t get the kind of information that the NSA could get off of wiretaps. IMO, Fusion GPS, Steele and Nellie Ohr are all chumps. They are essentially the fall guys. The real criminals are Obama, Brennan, Valerie Jarret and the Intelligence community operatives who have been attempting this coup for nearly 4 years now.

          Liked by 1 person

      • dd_sc says:

        I don’t think H. Clinton became a willing underling of Obama.

        I think Obama made her Secretary of State to keep her from going on the Sunday gabfests and criticizing him – “this is how would have handled it if I had won ….”

        The quid pro quo for taking that job was getting to run an illegal email server and operate pay-for-play schemes out of the State Department.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Harry D- EXCELLENT post.

        Liked by 1 person

      • drummerboy says:

        all the hubub that was hurting Schrillary had to do with “those dam emails”. 2 things that have always stood out to me is…..
        1. what was the date VSG publicly announced “R u s s i a if you have the emails…” and does that date fall in line with the origin of the coup?
        2. in the debate with VSG and Schrillary dressed as Boss Hogg in the white suit, VSG states he would like to hav a good relation with with P u t i n and Schrillary bout jumps out of her pants suit with glee and the expression on her face is total “GOT HIM” then mentally telling herself calm down calm down…
        watch that part of the debate and you’ll see it.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Redzone says:

        Harry – well said! I agree. I think Valerie Jarrett / Obama was the initial driving force in conjunction with Hillary. Collectively with their connections and $, they knew just what screws to turn and how far to turn them.

        Like

      • WSB says:

        You may want to read this. This level of traitors are the puppets.

        Since our Revolution and the War of 1812, the leaders of the rest of the World have needed to destroy the US.

        “Deep State: Follow the Rothschild, Soros, and Rockefeller Money”

        https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/27869-deep-state-follow-the-rothschild-soros-and-rockefeller-money

        Like

      • wendy forward says:

        You make some very good points-I agree with everything, mixing in the Edward Klein theory that Valerie Jarrett is Oblowme’s controller. I’m sure she told O to put Brennan in as CIA head.

        Like

    • Firefly says:

      Trump crashed the uniparty’s party. Both Dems and factions of GOP want Trump ruined. The GOP has to play low key because Trump is popular. It’s always been insiders vs outsiders. The press is nostalgic about Reagan- but the press and Dems and factions of gop wanted him ruined too. After listening to some comments Rumsfeld made about Bush sr – I wouldn’t be surprised if Bush sr. Was involved with the attempt to assassinate Reagan.

      Liked by 3 people

    • dd_sc says:

      They have to build the frame so that, should Hillary lose the election, they can immediately begin the coup. I suspect the original goal was to get Trump to resign in a 6-8 month time frame.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Thomas Holsinger says:

      I suspect they went after Trump in early 2016 because they went after every viable Republican presidential candidate. Embrace the healing power of “and”.

      “Minister: There is one thing: how did you know whose telephone to tap?”

      “Lebel: I didn’t, so I tapped all of them.”

      Quoe from _Day of the Jackal_.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mongo Mere Pawn says:

      If we ever find out the truth, my money is on the audit of NSA database usage by Admiral Rogers as the reason for everything. The subcontractors were using the database for Democratic opposition research and had been for some time. Trump was never the primary target. Cruz, Walker, Jeb! were all targeted. It was just that, when Rogers ordered the audit, Trump was looking like the nominee, so the CYA had to be directed at him. That’s why the FISA application got filed too late to be an effective October Surprise. It was all about setting up the groundwork for a special counsel to make it impossible for a Republican Senate or House to discover the political surveillance operation being run out of the Obama White House.

      Liked by 1 person

    • chuckyschmucky says:

      As Sundance as documented here countless times, the Obama criminals were attempting to manufacture a cover story to justify previous spying that they knew would be exposed after Mike Rogers found out about the illegal NSA database abuse. They were already doing spying on Trump — and many others — and after Rogers shut it down, they manufactured a cover story to justify that previous illegal activity.

      Liked by 3 people

    • I suspect very strongly we will eventually learn that ALL the GOP campaigns were targeted and spied on by the Obama administration. The Obama administration had so many things they had done (pallets of CASH to Iran, Fast and Furious, IRS, ect…ect) and needed them to remain hidden from Americans. Remember that PapaD worked on the Ben Carson campaign first so he would have already been on the radar.

      Like

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      Why go after Trump in early 2016 if they thought Hillary was a lock?

      Same reason Nixon’s Plumbers went after intel on the Dems and pulled their “ratf**king” moves when his re-election in ’72 was a “lock”.

      Never leave anything to chance which can be best assured by malevolence.

      What does he/CIA gain by having a Russia conspiracy operation running unless it’s on the behalf of the HRC’s administrations future state craft?

      You’re overthinking this………CIA ALWAYS blames Russia.
      and Russia doesn’t care.

      Russia is a kleptocracy with oligarch’s making enormous amounts of money off westerners
      AND WESTERNERS MAKING ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY OFF THEM

      and part of the deal is…..
      they may need to be blamed for things.

      Which is why Putin always looks like this:

      Like

    • Padric says:

      Why go after Trump in early 2016 if they thought Hillary was a lock?

      Because at the end of the day, from their point of view, there is only an upside to doing so. If HRC won, then she has an “election meddling” cudgel to use against Russia. If she lost, then they have something already in place to hinder or perhaps (they hoped) end the Trump presidency.

      Like

  2. Simply too much to be swept under the rug and survive as a constitutional republic.
    Just too much,

    Liked by 29 people

  3. It’s always the CIA. I bet Brennan is steady thinking up the names of some smucks he can throw under the bus!

    He is an evil, evil spawn of Satan. Sleep well Johnny boy.

    Liked by 2 people

    • wendy forward says:

      The perfect person to go after-he’s repulsive to any sane person.

      Liked by 4 people

    • I predict arkancide in Brennan’s future. There is no way he will go down alone and no way they will let him take the One with him.

      Liked by 3 people

      • rcogburn says:

        Being an ex-dci only gets you so far, just ask Bill Colby –

        On April 27, 1996, Colby set out from his weekend home in Rock Point, Maryland on a solo canoe trip.[15] His canoe was found the following day on a sandbar in the Wicomico River, a tributary of the Potomac, approximately a quarter mile from his home.[16] On May 6, Colby’s body was found in a marshy riverbank lying facedown not far from where his canoe was found.[15][17] After an autopsy, Maryland’s Chief Medical Examiner John E. Smialek ruled his death to be accidental.[17] Smialek’s report noted that Colby was predisposed to having a heart attack or stroke due to “severe calcified atherosclerosis” and that Colby likely “suffered a complication of this atherosclerosis which precipitated him into the cold water in a debilitated state and he succumbed to the effects of hypothermia and drowned”

        Like

        • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

          suffered a complication of this atherosclerosis which precipitated him into the cold water in a debilitated state

          This is medico-legal jargon for
          “hit on the head with a crow-bar and tossed in the river by hit men””

          Liked by 1 person

  4. helix35 says:

    Brennan couldn’t have acted without the approval and consent of Bathhouse Barry.

    Liked by 16 people

  5. ALEX says:

    The Senator Reid letter in August has been the clincher for me all this time.

    I’m glad you are highlighting this Sundance. There is NO explanation outside the Steele Dossier for the wording by Reid and it proves Brennan and the rest were involved in this way before their concocted timeline…

    Great article BTW….

    Liked by 17 people

    • Lee Moore says:

      True.

      But don’t imagine that it will be possible to get Brennan for lying to Congress about not having seen the dossier. The “dossier” is just a collective name for a number of individual papers written (allegedly) by Steele. ( And no doubt these papers existed as drafts before they existed as final reports. )

      If you’re the one supplying the “data” which is reprocessed and then shows up in the papers which come to be known as the “dossier”, you don’t need to see the dossier to give briefings about the data in the dossier.

      I could commission sundance to write my biography (though I probably won’t) and long before he even picks up his pencil, I could give you a heck of a briefing on the story that he eventually tells in The Amazing Lee Moore by Sundance.

      Liked by 1 person

      • elsuperbus says:

        Great explanation. Too many people getting tripped up about Brennan “lying” about not seeing the “dossier.” Brennan briefed Go8 on the pre-laundered dossier, but not the dossier-dossier. Then like a snake, slithered away.

        Like

    • littleanniefannie says:

      But Brennan briefed them each individually giving them the same information don’t cha no! So why repeat the same thing 8 times? Memory lapses? Confusion? I would bet 7 got the same info. Nunes got the “sanitized” version.

      Like

  6. John Davis says:

    Thank you for your great work. If these actions of a senior CIA official against a presidential candidate doesn’t make a person scared-squared the you ain’t paying much attention.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. Darrell Michael Richardson says:

    He won’t be the only one to hang for treason there will be a few more.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Elric VIII says:

    I hope they place Brennan on an effective suicide watch. We mustn’t cheat the hangman.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. James A Groome says:

    What happens if Brennan was given a pardon on Obama’s last day in office?

    Liked by 1 person

    • sarasotosfan says:

      I don’t believe those things are secret. It would need to be recorded.

      Liked by 2 people

      • James Felter says:

        What was done by the bearer was done for the good of the state. I don’t recall an authorization for lettres de cachet in the constitution.

        Like

    • Linda K. says:

      Interesting, if Obama pardons Brennan, for something which he is also guilty.

      Liked by 1 person

    • DeWalt says:

      Your on the right track. What about letters of Immunity from Prosecution? What happens when they all produce them?
      What will Barr do if they all have letters of immunity from Rosenstein? Written and granted during Muellers investigation.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Amy2 says:

        Null and void if they’tr part of the conspiracy. RR’s signature is still on the FISA.

        Liked by 6 people

      • livefreeordieguy says:

        It is a worry, DeWalt… Is it not true that such immunity can be rescinded if it is demonstrated that the recipient lied or otherwise didn’t live up to the terms after being granted? Because my guess is that many have lied post immunity — Mueller just did — and they would lie again if put under oath now and asked the big questions. So they either mail it in on Obama or lose their immunity. To me, if they are all forced to tell the whole truth about the breadth and depth of the corruption then the nation has a chance — even if they don’t do time. Showing the country in no uncertain terms that President Obama and his administration were the most corrupt in American history will be enough for me — and enough to keep it from happening again. I want heads to roll, but exposing Obama — completely? I’ll take it.

        Liked by 2 people

        • underwhelmingposter says:

          My understanding as well. Immunity is granted to get information needed to fry bigger fish. It is immunity from prosecution. If it is determined that you lied or did not live up to the agreement, it could be overturned.

          Liked by 3 people

          • livefreeordieguy says:

            Thanks UWP… I’m thinking that puts several potential immunity holders at risk of losing it — and subjecting themselves to prosecution… Will be interesting to see how it plays out.

            Like

      • CM-TX says:

        Mueller would have to show he actually investigated the other side– thus uncovering the truth in their conspiracy to frame PDJT. But Mueller obviously never did.

        There was no other relevant prosecution cases, nor proper investigations to warrant any such immunity deals. They were also never brought in for questioning. The immunity deal would need to be specific, having strict limitations in it’s scope… were it lawfully VALID.

        Further, if at any point they were found to have LIED, or provided FALSE/misleading evidence to investigators– or Perjured themselves in any testimony given during Court proceedings, & possibly Congressional Hearings… such immunity deals are VOIDED. Since they’re Democrats, lying at some juncture is a given!

        Liked by 3 people

      • littleanniefannie says:

        If the entire investigation was a fraud, why would any immunity granted in a fraud not themselves also be fraudulent??

        Like

    • snellvillebob says:

      Obama could do what he did on both of his birth certificates and write Brennan a post-dated pardon tomorrow but it would not hold up in court.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Orygun says:

    McConnell and Burr watched this whole thing unfold and never lifted a finger. The Senate is a mess.

    Liked by 20 people

    • L4grasshopper says:

      Burr I get. He’s thoroughly corrupt.

      But Turtle too? That would be very disappointing. But then….the guy has allowed Burr to chair the corrupt SSCI, hasn’t he?

      Liked by 10 people

      • NC Patriot says:

        Remember—-Brennan briefed the gang of eight individually? We know he did not give NUNES all the info. Was he totally straight with the other Repub. Gang of eight ?

        We may never know that.

        Liked by 3 people

        • underwhelmingposter says:

          Ryan was one. They could have given it to him straight and he would not have lifted a finger. If McCain was on it, he too would not have cared. In fact, wasn’t he the one who took a copy he received and went directly to the Fibbies with it without telling PDJT!

          Like

      • dd_sc says:

        McConnell is owned by Chamber of Commerce and Wall Street. He would be more than happy to sit on his hands and watch a coup against President Trump unfold.

        Liked by 4 people

        • jebg46 says:

          Don’t forget McConnell’s Chinese wife’s communist connections either.

          Liked by 1 person

          • dd_sc says:

            Now that I’ve thought about it some more, McConnell and Schumer may have been more active than I thought. I think McConnell recommended Jeff Sessions as AG which would:

            1. Remove Trump’s most vocal ally on immigration from the Senate.
            2. Set up the recusal of Sessions.

            McConnell may have known, via Schumer, that Senator Al Franken (of all people) would bring up Session’s recusal from all things Russia during the confirmation hearings.

            All that would have to be overlaid with the other timelines

            Liked by 1 person

      • livefreeordieguy says:

        Judges aside (not a small matter, I realize), Senator McConnell is one of PDJT’s biggest problems… Mitch cannot be trusted… He’s no Paul Ryan, but he’s close… He’d be happy to see the president crash and burn. The CoC can’t abide the economic havoc that the president is wreaking now… Which means Mitch can’t either.

        Liked by 5 people

        • dd_sc says:

          Judges and tax cuts are the red meat RINOs like McConnell throw out to keep the conservative and libertarian leaning republicans in the party. Don’t get me wrong, it’s all good, but sort of a short leash.

          Liked by 1 person

    • annieoakley says:

      Correct.

      Liked by 1 person

    • dd_sc says:

      McConnell may have watched; Ryan and Burr appear to be more active in the coup.

      Liked by 6 people

  11. Chieftain says:

    I’d like to know the dates for which Nellie Ohr received money, directly or indirectly from the CIA.

    Like

  12. Sporty says:

    Brennen knows too much and very well will be Epstein’s bunkmate in hell soon.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. sundance says:

    Liked by 33 people

    • jeans2nd says:

      Why was no defensive briefing given to anyone in the Trump campaign by the FBI? A defensive briefing by the FBI is required for anyone being approached for solicitation as a possible “spy” for another country, per Lt Col Tony Shaffer, interview w/Jan Jekielek..

      No defensive briefing was given as there were no Russians, thus no need for a defensive briefing.

      Ref. last vid posted above, Brennan, around 2 min mark, commenting on the Trump Tower meeting, circa 9 Jun 2016.

      Liked by 2 people

      • TarsTarkas says:

        Likely because the EC stated that Trump MIGHT be a Russian Asset. And it’s OK to lie to someone under investigation. They didn’t brief congress because they were afraid someone might inform Trump he was under investigation, and they wanted to keep surveilling him in hopes he’d make a mistake.
        It’s effectively the MeToo of politics: An accusation, no matter how baseless, being used to turn the full powers of the government against an unsuspecting individual in order to defame and destroy them. If Rogers had not gone to Trump warning him he was under surveillance we might be complaining about President Pelosi.
        If we had a platform to complain on, that is. Dissing a Democratic President, especially a woman, might be considered hate speech.
        There must be severe consequences for the seditionists. Or they’ll do it again in 2024, if not earlier.

        Liked by 1 person

      • CM-TX says:

        He also said the campaign itself is considered a “person,” so they were required to brief the officials in charge of it.

        But they never notified anyone re. Carter Paige, nor about any other supposed “foreign agent” coming in contact with the Campaign.

        Not sure how they could possibly get around the intentional oversight… unless they admit to fully knowing those “suspects” weren’t actually “spies”.

        Like

    • DeWalt says:

      Worse than Russians.

      Like

    • Firefly says:

      The smartest thing Trump did was refuse to testify. He was nearly hung for avoiding being found guilty of steeling the horse that was never stolen in the first place.

      Never talk to any law enforcement or fbi without consulting your attorney first. Law enforcement can write anything in a report and the courts usually go with law enforcement statements.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      Magical Unicorn more like it.

      Like

  14. JoeMeek says:

    John Brennan may sound like a psychopath, he may even look like a psychopath, but don’t let that fool you, he really is a psychopath !!!

    Just by himself, he is proof that the CIA should be broken into a thousand pieces and cast to the winds as JFK wanted.

    Liked by 14 people

  15. sarasotosfan says:

    If we take this to its origins, I will be shocked if Cody Shearer and Sidney Blumenthal did not begin the dossier by providing the skeleton to Glenn Simpson.

    Liked by 6 people

    • BestBets says:

      I’ve always thought that Shearer and Sid Vicious fed the Russians who reported to Steele the dossier baloney. Can’t you just see those two cackling over it, laughing all the while about the idiotic stories they were coming up with?

      Like

    • docnova66 says:

      I’ve long thought that Simpson and Steele were just the “laundry service” for info supplied by Sid & Cody – “Oh. lookie here! This info came from the ever so reputable ex-MI6 spy, and totally wasn’t made up here in the bowels of State and the IC!”

      Like

  16. Jim in TN says:

    This may be a bit pedantic, but if Brennan approved everything before Nellie Ohr sent it to FusionGPS/Steele, he would have known almost everything in the Steele Dossier before he actually saw the Steele Dossier.

    Ya just got to know how to parse these statements. Lying by technically telling truthful falsehoods.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. joeknuckles says:

    I sure hope Brennan ends up with a broken hyoid bone by the time this is over.

    Liked by 4 people

    • sarasotosfan says:

      I hope CNN interviews him straight up and asks him to answer on the record. I’d like to see if he is up for that.

      Like

    • sarasotosfan says:

      As to a broken hyoid bone, I do not want to see him die by strangulation. Dunno if hanging is still an approved method of applying the death penalty.

      I promise not to shed a tear should he expire serving time in a federal institution, preferably Super Max in solitary confinement, owing to his security clearance. Yes John, that security clearance.

      Liked by 2 people

    • All Too Much says:

      At the age of 98 while sitting in solitary confinement, affectionately called secured housing these days, for 30 years.

      Like

  18. Squirrel Doc says:

    Senator Graham keeps saying that his purpose in going forward is to ensure that this “never happens again.” That’s as bogus a reason as the initial setup. The purpose in going forward on these investigations is to see that justice is done. Perps in handcuffs. Absent this, confidence in our legal system is a sure sign of naivete.

    Liked by 4 people

    • sarasotosfan says:

      I dearly want to see McCain’s involvement exposed but his good friend Lindsey does not want to go there.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Maquis says:

        Lest he join him?

        Liked by 2 people

      • CountryDoc says:

        And why is Lindsey’s motivation? Is he complicit? Is there a secret to hide?

        Liked by 2 people

        • Firefly says:

          Lindsey Graham advised McCain to go to the FBI and turn over the Dossier Kramer rushed out to London to obtain. It’s also interesting the Lindsey Graham was at some meeting with McCain in Italy.

          Lindsey also forced Barr on Trump claiming the senate wouldn’t approve any other pick. Trump only says he “hopes” Barr will be fair – and says he “thinks so”. Sometimes Trump uses understatement- but usually when he trusts someone he’ll give a stronger endorsement than he’s given about Barr.

          Liked by 2 people

      • SKIDROE says:

        Brennan and his team (obuma’s) has blackmail sh.t on everybody. Graham, McConnell, Ryan, every senator, and specially on all the judges. Why do you think so many Republicans have retired in the last few years?

        Liked by 2 people

    • Maquis says:

      Making sure it never happens again is far from bogus, and PDJT most assuredly knows that scorched ass prosecutions are the pain factor required to prevent any attempt at its like again.

      Like

      • Firefly says:

        Trump says he wants to make Sue it doesn’t happen to any president. Really, this shouldn’t happen to anyone. The ALCU report warning about the fbi under the patriot act could make up stuff with no evidence was ignored. By restricting this to political espionage means Barr has no intent to protect everyone except political spying. Barr has been promoting Comey’s back door encryption saying the citizens should accept the risk.the real issue is the patriot act that had no checks and balances (presumed the fbi and cia had integrity).

        Liked by 1 person

    • CountryDoc says:

      Sometimes I think Lindsey is trying to blend in with the white hats, hoping people don’t discover his closet.

      Liked by 6 people

    • trialbytruth says:

      “Well, I guess that means Lindsey is a very tough man, isn’t he? Huh?”

      Like

  19. All Too Much says:

    The last of the Brennan interviews SD links is mind-blowing.
    Probably others here feel the same.
    For me, its totally Sundance who’s led to the point I can see Brennan’s lies this clearly.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. Linda K. says:

    So, do I understand that Brennan, and Obama’s circle, who instigated this plan, will be subject to indictment by Durham? Surely, falsifying government intel work cannot be condoned when it is treasonous?

    Like

  21. fred5678 says:

    Maria is super — maybe she could give lessons to Sean, Laura, et al to LET YOUR GUEST FINISH THEIR ANSWERS.

    She looks great is her red dress, too.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Firefly says:

      When Maria does interject she does it to put them on the spot to answer the question – or pin them down on something. Hannity can’t do that because he fundamentally hasn’t read all the docs. He just parrots the same thing every night. He also controls Solomon and Sarah to only put out a couple nuggets at best. Then we get another round of soon the hammer will fall tic took. Just like with Hillary emails.

      Liked by 3 people

    • underwhelmingposter says:

      Amen to that!!!

      Like

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      It all starts with having only 3 guests on your hour long show instead of 30.

      Like

  22. Greg1 says:

    “During the time James Comey’s FBI was running operation Crossfire Hurricane, Comey admitted he intentionally never informed congressional oversight: “because of the sensitivity of the matter“. I suspect he knew there was manipulation behind the events that initiated the construct; he was, however, willfully blind to it.”

    Sundance, I don’t think willfully blind to it will be enough to offset it if indeed Comey has many more “memos” to himself documenting every step along the way…………in an effort to protect himself. Those memos, if they exist, would be proof that Comey was skeptical the entire time……….and went along with it in the hopes it succeeded and his memos to himself would never be necessary.

    You know, it seems reasonable to think Comey should have been skeptical when he realized this:

    “The EC was not an official product of the U.S. intelligence community. Additionally, Brennan was NOT using official partnerships with intelligence agencies of our Five-Eyes partner nations; and he did not provide raw intelligence –as an outcome of those relationships– to the FBI.”

    Yet, throughout all of this, Comey has been antagonistic of everything positive regarding President Trump. And he has stuck to his script regarding all he and the fbi (I can NOT capitalize it anymore) have done……..even as the truth starts to come out.

    May God allow the entire truth to come out and for those who have done wrong to be held accountable here on earth, soon, before Judgement Day.

    Liked by 7 people

    • ozymandiasssss says:

      The damning part about Comey I believe will be that he knew it was bullshit but didn’t have the guts to pull it. He just kept it “quiet” till the election was over. Frankly, I think PDJT could have turned him, but it wasn’t handled properly just like everything else.

      Like

    • meow4me2 says:

      Greg, it might help you to capitalize fbi by spelling it this way – FIB. There, that’s more fitting, isn’t it?

      Like

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      Comey would have known the moment he asked:

      “OK Pete………so why are we STARTING with George Papadopolous and NOT Mifsud?
      Shouldn’t we find out if he’s a RUSSIAN AGENT FIRST?”

      Don’t need to go to G-Man school to figure this one out.

      As my little sister used to say
      “DUUUUUH!”

      Like

  23. Kid Jupiter says:

    It’s taking them too long. People are starting to get tired of this shit, like, me. Time to prosecute or STFU.

    Liked by 3 people

    • ozymandiasssss says:

      The problem is it was a CIA job. I really don’t see how Durham can do it. Unless there’s a rat. Somebody has to say that there was an agreement to frame Donald Trump. That’s how it has to be framed. That’s going to be hard to come by.

      Like

  24. ristvan says:

    Excellent summary post.
    I went and checked, because remembered the info was in a previous thread here.
    Nunes made two criminal ‘conspiracy’ referrals in addition to his five congressional perjury referrals. One was FISA. The other was ‘EC’. Since both were ‘criminal conspiracies’, multiple people were referred for both.

    That establishes Brennan, Halper, and Mifsud at least on the manufactured EC. What Durham has to do is nail down the jury facts incontrovertibly (although this post provides a good evidence roadmap) and then figure out what criminal statutes best apply. That part is harder because a lot of EC is overseas, while US criminal law applies mainly in US unless there are international conspiracies (think transnational narco cartels).

    Liked by 6 people

  25. Mncpo(ret) says:

    Imagine where we would be without our John Solomon’s, our Sundances, our Tracy Beanz, et. al. We’d still be blind, going through our daily lives without a clue.

    I thank God that He provided, not only, Donald John Trump to save our country but also the myriad of researchers and anons that have devoted their lives to finding the truth of this evil.

    There really is no stopping what’s coming. People know, people are talking, people are awake.

    Liked by 7 people

  26. I have always been suspicious of the PATRIOT Act, which appeared like Venus in the clam-shell immediately after 9/11: “fully-formed in all its 900-page glory.” No one writes laws that fast.

    Anyhow, it is very obvious that PATRIOT must be extensively revised, if not (better …) completely replaced, because its provisions did not work to safeguard American citizens. Numerous abuses occurred throughout many halls of Government – some under the IG’s purview, some not. And, had Trump not won the election and have been the sort of person that he is, they would have gotten away with it.

    I want to see us emerge from all of this, not only with richly-deserved criminal convictions, but “lessons learned,” laws changed and laws written.

    Liked by 8 people

    • QCM says:

      Consider, also, the probability that the Patriot Act was merely passed to cover for, and enshrine in a legal framework, many of the actual practices of the intelligence community, with a very thin veneer of due process protections added on. Not enough to be effective, but enough to placate many. The actions the Patriot Act authorizes were taking place long before 2001.

      Liked by 6 people

    • DeWalt says:

      Replace? Repeal? Even Nunes voted to continue it. Every conspiracy since 9/11 has come true.

      Like

    • The capabilities and impact of the internet and cell phone communications were just beginning to be appreciated by law enforcement in 2001. AG Ashcroft came out with an appeal to update our antiquated land-line surveillance and warrant authority standards within days of 9/11. . . . and we did.

      There is nothing inherently unconstitutional about the Patriot Act. Any and all abuse thereof is violative of Fourth et. al. Amendment constitutional protections – the predicates.

      In his first appearance before Congress, AG Barr emphasized that he will be questioning the PREDICATES for the surveillance and attendant investigations.

      If there’s a mass consensus for “reform” and “clarifications” of the rules, then it’s a cover-up. If they focus on what we already know are false & manufactured predicates and there are prosecutions accordingly, then we will have preserved the foundations of our Constitutional Republic…..or , as B. Franklin said p: “If [we] can keep it”

      Liked by 2 people

      • Shyster says:

        Disagree re constitutionality – In my opinion, the FISA 2 hop rule has to be unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment! A warrant supported by probable cause against Mr. A necessarily scoops up Mr. A’s conversations with Mr. B, but how in the world, considering the plain language of the 4th Amendment, can the second hop legally be supported by probable cause to scoop up the conversations between Mr. B and Mr. C where there is no probable cause whatsoever? It has to be unconstitutional. If I’m wrong please explain why.

        Liked by 1 person

  27. pucecatt says:

    I still think there is more to Carter Page , he seems like a man scorned via his twitter .. wasn’t he on McCains team at one time ?

    Like

    • Beau Geste says:

      Carter Page has been an agent for both the FBI and CIA – what more is needed to show he is not an agent of a foreign power as alleged under oath by the DOJ/FBI to the FISA Court to get a warrant to spy on PDJT and up to 60 million people connected by the 2-hop rule?

      Liked by 1 person

  28. ozymandiasssss says:

    “has already led to a criminal referral to U.S. Attorney John Durham by HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes.” I know you named some possibilities there but surely we can narrow it down and for what, exactly

    Like

  29. thomas says:

    The biggest political scandal in the history of America and if no one pays for this we no longer live in a constitutional republic.!

    Like

  30. I’m down with all of the intrigue, the duplishishness, the LIEING. But can someone please tell me how the cataclysmically annoying Chuck Todd can appear on camera with an equally annoyingly bad moustache trim job?I

    Dude, back off!

    Liked by 1 person

  31. cantcforest says:

    I am very impressed by PDJT’s economic team and Sundance’s grasp of the subject. I’m very impressed by Sundance’s coverage and analysis of the attempted coup. To have such a grasp of the two major issues affecting our world today is worthy of world recognition and a major place in our government. Perhaps 2024. Are you a felon Sundance? A clone?
    Thank you for what you do and God bless and keep you and yours.

    Liked by 3 people

    • DeWalt says:

      Sundance should consolidate all his work. He has been chronicling “The Fall of the Republic”. If these people are not prosecuted he will already have the book written.

      Like

  32. UncleGrumpy says:

    John Brennan , justice is coming and payment is due.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. eujenek says:

    John the swinger.

    Like

  34. Bryan Alexander says:

    I have ZERO doubt that Obama, Brennan and Valerie Jarret are the ones who put this whole operation together. Using the CIA to run an operation against the other political party? That would be pretty much life in prison for anyone.

    Obama approved it. You can bank on that.

    If William Barr and John Durham would actually start putting some of the low hanging fruit in front of a Grand Jury and charging them with Sedition and multiple violations of 18 US Code 793(f), they could then start getting plea deals to get to the masterminds of this coup attempt.

    Liked by 3 people

  35. jx says:

    Bobby Blaze Barr is hot on the trail and will crack the case in another year or two. Too bad his department’s resources are being exhausted fighting those pesky FOIA suits tooth and nail.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Bogeyfree says:

    Another great piece and write up by Sundance.

    Personally we should get 500 Treepers to email to PT at Whitehouse.gov and also mail 500 copies to AG Barr.

    I’d also suggest a copy to every Republican Senator and Representative in Congress and every conservative media person so these folks can get up to speed with real info.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Amy2 says:

    Brennan questions Don Jr.’s ethics? Viper. Does the cat licking his chops have a name? ‘Love it!

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Bogeyfree says:

    Truly, Sundance should go on Levin’s Show where he will gladly dedicate the full hour to allow Sundance to walk the audience through all these dot connections.

    It would really open some eyes IMO.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Devil in the Blue Drapes says:

    Lindsey: well, ya know, I’m really curious how this whole thing got started….”

    Maria: will you call John Brennan to testify?

    Lindsey: whoa, whoa, whoa Maria, I’m not THAT curious!
    Besides, Songbir… er, I mean, the late-great patriot Senator John McCain’s dying words to me, “By any means necessary”, still hold meaning for me today.

    Liked by 4 people

  40. Beigun says:

    The stench of the “Banquet of Sedition” carries far and wide. Those that inhale the dream of power usurped becomes themselves most foul and contaminated. The cure for the body politic is painful, but necessary, to keep the Republic safe from future calamity.

    Now KEELHAUL that SOB Brennan!

    Intelligence has always been subordinate to operational command for fear of Sedition!

    Liked by 1 person

    • littleanniefannie says:

      How about put him in one of those crab pots on Deadliest Catch? I have visions of the crabs pinching off hunks of him. That would necessitate a wet suit (to cover most of his body) and an air tank. I want him to know what’s happening. No light though. Let them sneak up on him. His exposed parts would need to be rubbed in dead fish before his bath!

      Like

  41. islandpalmtrees says:

    Do I have this correctly?
    Nellie Ohr was obviously a DOJ-NSD contractor in 2015 and 2016 at the same time she was working for Fusion GPS and we have Nellie Ohr again, a known CIA open source contractor, seeking out Glenn Simpson at the direction of Brennan to work at Fusion GPS in 2015.

    Like

    • underwhelmingposter says:

      Wouldn’t it be easy to find out if she was underemployed. Her income is certainly on many data bases.

      Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        Life would be easier, if I had the first few characters of her social security numbers, too. You know, it’s possible that Nellie Ohr was doing more than passing information out and doing research.

        Like

  42. Ploni says:

    If Brennan fakes his own death, demand an autopsy!

    Like

  43. For Eyes says:

    “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” – Edmund Burke

    Liked by 2 people

  44. Jonathan Galt says:

    Sending my deepest condolences to the Mifsud and Halper families for the impending suicides.

    Like

  45. Margaret Berger says:

    I really think that Carter Page is cia and knew he was being used.

    Liked by 2 people

  46. Suspicious Cat looks temporarily satisfied, but is thinking about the next canary. As this progresses and revelations come to light, I am thankful that PDJT had the patience and foresight to hold on to the classified documents, not blast them into the public domain, and hand them over to someone who could utilize them to build the case. I look forward to SC’s next meal…

    Like

  47. Linda K. says:

    It would go a long way to making me happy if Brennan was in jail for sedition and conspiracy.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. Margaret Berger says:

    Also I hope that halper’s and mufsud’s legal bills are mounting. Do you think they will go the go fund me route like mccabe or will sora$$ pay them?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s