Oddly Enough, Jake Tapper is Not Lying Here…

The video snippet below shows within 10 minutes after the 448-page Robert Mueller report was publicly released, Jake Tapper identifies two reporters, Laura Jarrett and Manu Raju, who Tapper says have “read the report.”

.

It’s almost guaranteed Jake Tapper is not lying in that segment. Yes, it is impossible for two journalists to read 448 pages of the report and prepare to discuss it within minutes… but that’s not what they did.

The Mueller people who wrote that report; the same Mueller people who tipped off CNN to the raid on Roger Stone; the same Mueller people who coordinated leaks to Buzzfeed, New York Times and Washington Post; almost certainly gave copies of the full and unredacted report to their media allies well in advance of AG Barr’s formal release.

This entire operation against the Trump campaign is a coordinated effort amid government officials, politicians, political groups external to government and media allies. None of this is happenstance; all of this is well coordinated. Once you know the signs, you can spot them everywhere…

This video example with CNN is just one pixel in a political picture made from thousands of individually identifiable pixels, here’s another:

This CNN story was late-day June 14th, 2017.

What was the purpose for the story? It was a coordinated effort between The Washington Post, then CNN, and the Mueller team. They were working the obstruction angle… Read the Mueller Report… It’s all detailed in there.

The Mueller team was using the media as a willing tool to bait President Trump to react and provide “obstruction” evidence they would use in the “obstruction’ file.

Think that sounds crazy? Well, these tweets are obstruction evidence within the Mueller Report.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, media bias, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

313 Responses to Oddly Enough, Jake Tapper is Not Lying Here…

  1. wrd9 says:

    This is a travesty.

    Liked by 9 people

    • BigTalkers says:

      Just another day in our once great capital… what’s left of it anyway.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Ready Steady Go says:

        I love the look on rod rosensteins face at the Barr press conference. Lol! POTUS is playing dirty and has something on him/them. And I don’t mean spygate. He has something else he is holding over rod. The look on his face-“Andy, help me”!!! This is over. They are rolling out the chosen one to change the subject. Barr and Mueller hearing and it’s over. Notice no leaks of anything else? Teflon don got it all out. Rudy may not release his counter report. They don’t need it

        Liked by 2 people

    • If Trump is going to declassify and start bring justice to these criminals he MUST STRIKE NOW before democrats start their charade of investigations whereupon they will be able to accuse him of obstruction. Now is the time to strike not once democrats have started proceedings.

      Liked by 12 people

      • Tl Howard says:

        I agree. Let THEM feel the avalanche.
        Secondly, for you lawyers out there: does a television viewer have “standing” to bring a law suit against the networks/reporters who constantly feed them the “news” that Trump colluded w/ Russia or that he was an agent?

        The FCC used to have standards which had to be met by the three major networks. (I realize the FCC doesn’t control cable stations.) Seems to me the FCC could easily prove, if it wanted to, that the three major networks do NOT label the programs they call “news” properly. They are often wrong and it can be proved.

        The cabal could never have pulled off any of this if even the basic standards of journalism were practiced by the three major networks. Journalists, editors, producers need to be fired and big media owners need to pay a price.

        Liked by 12 people

        • Michael Hunt says:

          Yes, let them feel the avalanche . that may get some of the dems jumping ship on the impeachment train and also make them want to flip on each other to cover their own arses.

          I find the FCC regulations concerning personal attacks interesting. https://www.fcc.gov/media/program-content-regulations

          You bring up an interesting topic about whether viewers have ” standing” against all these news people telling us there was collusion ( now they say they just raised the question of collusion). I know nothing about law but wouldn’t it be dandy if us conservatives could join together and file a giant class action against cnn? I also wonder if we could start a campaign for everyone to file fcc complaints?

          Liked by 4 people

          • The question is really Can they face consequences for KNOWINGLY giving false information under the guise of news? The days of honest journalism are gone. Name journalists who are truly fair and honest and without bias. I will start with Catherine Herridge. She is always very careful not to get out in front of her skis on a story. I cannot think of a time she has injected her opinion into a story. She’s the Joe Friday of the news crews—just the facts ma’am.

            Liked by 9 people

      • Sam says:

        I am starting to wonder why Barr allowed the report to be released to the public as written. It’s doing tremendous damage by the deliberately slanted way it is written and gives the Democrats something to sink their teeth into, it also takes Crowdstrike’s word that Russia hacked the DNC server vs a leak from within. How could a total exoneration, that didn’t have to be released at all to the public, wind up hurting our president so badly, maybe even mortally? Is Barr going to be a real AG or is he really there to help the snakes from behind the scenes?

        Liked by 1 person

      • NC Patriot says:

        Democrats in congress can’t bring charges—–only make noise ! And we have some VOCAL defenders on the committees which are going to be political theatre.

        Like

    • jj1319 says:

      That Laura Jarrett is getting chunkier?

      Not really. I expect her to be 250lbs by December.

      Like

      • Laura Jarett has been anxiously awaiting decision of the judge (that would be me) as to whether she has won the much coveted Ana Navarro Trophy aka The Giant Burrito of Lard Award. Just pack on a few more kilos Laura and you will achieve your goal.

        Like

    • All members of the cabal are death penalty eligible.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Aunt Clara says:

    My emotional response is I despise these people and I want to wreck things. My rational response is what is the best way forward to insure this never happens again.

    Liked by 22 people

    • lowyder993s says:

      OFP (Our Favorite President) has made it clear what HAS to be done!!! Perpetrators MUST answer for their crimes NOW! The punishment must be SWIFT and JUST. THIS is the only way a group like this would never conceive of doing this again! Anything less…Arms MUST be taken up!

      Liked by 14 people

      • CHenie says:

        Well, it appears we are now waiting for the IG report. Better wake up folks or this time in 2021 it’ll be “we should have…”

        Liked by 4 people

        • beach lover says:

          Seems like that is the normal course, so far. We have to wait for this investigation to be over, or this report to come out. I’m frankly tired of those in the DOJ and FBI and probably the dems in congress, holding the country hostage from the truth, and justice.

          These people would have no chance if the facts were known. If Barr is as decent and good as it is rumored, then he should get on this immediately. Don’t let them have the false narrative another hour. Enough of protecting their own.

          I hope he starts with the man that stood behind him, like a scared prisoner. RR chose the wrong side to appease, and he can do a lot to right his and the Mueller team’s wrongs by admitted what really happened.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Terri says:

            I thought we were waiting for the Mulehead Witchhunt report to drop before President Trump declassified? Why are we always waiting for the enemy to pull another one over on us, can’t we ever strike first? This is getting pathetic.

            Liked by 7 people

      • sejmon says:

        You mean martial law ??????

        Liked by 1 person

    • avman1339 says:

      I am not alone…
      Whew!!
      🙂

      Liked by 4 people

      • bodieisland says:

        No, your not alone, avman. I was still waiting for the other shoe to drop and finally see McCabe go to jail, then SD shows us BTW, his charges have been dropped by Wash DC Prosecutor Lieu. These roaches are everywhere! I now hear the word conspiracy being bandied about. Are we back to that too? I also want something done yesterday, POTUS!! Please?

        Liked by 6 people

        • Tl Howard says:

          I want Brennan and Clapper. Of course I want Obama and Hillary but I doubt that will happen. I want some newsmen and women hanged. I want the NYTimes and WaPost out of business or sold to people who care about journalism and care about a free and fair 4th estate.
          I want NBC and MSNBC and CNN out of business. I want Comcast and At&t revealed as the puller of strings that they are.
          I want the FCC to tear the three majors new assholes.
          And a lot more…

          Liked by 11 people

    • CHenie says:

      And what are your suggestions for insuring this never happens again?

      Like

  3. Grrrrrr……………..
    And Grrrrrrrrrrrrr @ WordPress messing with my posting here!

    Liked by 2 people

    • lowyder993s says:

      Feel u brother…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Issy says:

      It messes with me about every other day. I can like post sometimes, but my replies don’t get posted. Other times I have to post a reply before I can like. Today I got lucky, I can post and like.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MelH says:

        WHY is this happening, Issy? For the past two weeks, maybe more, WordPress seems to have an agenda counter to any I can comply with. They seem to be following in the footsteps of Twitter and Facebook, deciding who they will harass because their unpublished rules haven’t been followed. We are such a compliant people here, willing to follow the rules, if only we could find out what they are..

        Like

  4. trialbytruth says:

    Gabe please apply the Mueller rule. Probe it didn’t happen.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. CNN_sucks says:

    Yes, media is a willing fools by the dnc and obama’s lackeys. They leak it to the media and use as reasons to investigate. Bunch of criminals.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Fools Gold says:

    Advanced copies? Them some reading fools!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. The time frame SD mentions is a big hint!

    Not possible without a coordinated preview.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Lottacats says:

    Wow, just WOW!

    Like

  9. Julia Adams says:

    I also suspect someone on Mueller’s team leaked the full report to James Comey. His recent tweets of him standing in a redwood forest seeking answers to so many questions was another coordinated event in my opinion.

    The Deep State wants us to believe that Comey’s involuntary termination was an actual act of obstruction because in Comey’s demented mind once Trump was told he was under investigation Comey thinks Trump wanted to cover up his Russian double agent Jason Bourne lifestyle.

    Liked by 5 people

    • I know we can’t prove that right now, but the possibility of RM giving a copy to JC is very believable because it fits the narrative, the agenda and past history of complicit coordination between DS and LSM/MSM.

      More simply stated, it fits a long-term pattern, a mold that never changes.

      Like

    • USA First! says:

      What most people missed in that picture is that he was standing among the Redwoods. The Redwoods is where they have the Bohemian Grove which is a gathering of the world elites every year to give allegiance to Molech.

      Comey was in essence saying he has questions to all the elite in power how President Trump has not been brought down by there scheme yet and how he finds himself caught in the web they wove.

      Liked by 4 people

    • bertdilbert says:

      Comey was in the forest looking at the trees and wondering how many trees would have to die to provide the paper for thousands of copies of the 400 page report. The report that is not worth the paper it is printed on.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Issy says:

      Comey has gone Zen on us.

      Like

  10. That the media and DS players are 100% complicit in all things anti-Trump (and in the 2016 election, pro-HRC) is so obnoxiously obvious, the only ones who can’t see that, or don’t want to see that, are the herd of ostriches with their heads in a hole in the ground….or elsewhere.

    Know what I mean, Vern?! 🤨

    Liked by 8 people

  11. Mickie says:

    If that’s the case, which I’m sure it is, the Democrats have already read in private what they’re publicly asking for.

    Liked by 3 people

    • The Boss says:

      Yeah, but they need to demand what they already have, since the SC office leaked classified information and grand jury testimony which are criminal acts. This is no different than Comey et al getting a fraudulent FISA warrant to give the appearance that all of the illegal spying done prior to October 2016 was legal.

      Liked by 8 people

      • Sam says:

        How in the world can a FISA warrant be retroactive? Doesn’t that make an assumption of approval before it’s granted?

        Liked by 1 person

        • The Boss says:

          The point isn’t whether a FISA warrant is retroactive but rather its giving the appearance of legitimacy and legality. That appearance they seek is rightly evidence of a cover-up of criminal conduct. The tools of the democrat party lied to the FISA court to cover up previous illegal spying. Now they’ll lie to a federal district court and all the way to the Supreme Court to cover up their illegal possession of classified information.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Lindenlee says:

        The DS wants the names and addresses of the Grand Jury members to hound and terrorize them to recanting their indictments. This IS VERY DANGEROUS.

        We are back to Night Riders now. Must retaliate.

        Like

  12. Larry says:

    This should be investigated by DOJ IG. Leaking is against DOJ – FBI policy. Additionally if un-redacted copies then Grand Jury material and classified material was compromised.

    Liked by 6 people

    • emeraldcoaster says:

      Suggest we skip the IG and go directly to an AG-directed criminal investigation. Leaking classified material (e.g., grand jury testimony) is illegal. The IG makes referrals only—not criminal prosecutions. The dirtbags have flaunted their misdeeds, so it’s time the AG drop the hammer.

      Liked by 8 people

  13. John Obidienzo says:

    “If we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment……..”

    Non-traditional prosecutorial judgments are the stuff of Witch Hunts.

    “If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.”

    When traditional prosecutorial bodies find no evidence of a crime they do not cast aspersions on the subject’s innocence. The subject is either charged with a crime or he is not. Iffy conclusions make for never ending investigations, never ending leaks, and never ending Fake News.

    Liked by 11 people

  14. Yeah, well Michael Avenati thought he was going to take down POTUS and look how he ended up. And Stormy, having to pay Trump’s Court fees.

    The fat lady has not sung yet on the issue of media collusion… we’re just getting started.

    Buckle up for a bumpy ride.

    Liked by 9 people

  15. Sentient says:

    Interestingly, on NPR tonight (I listen so you don’t have to) on Amy Walters’ program, it was admitted that the charge that Trump tried to obstruct Mueller was belied by the very release of the Mueller report. Bogus Reuters polls notwithstanding, I predict that that will be the eventual popular take-away. Trump let Mueller stay on, ergo, no obstruction. Dems’ obstruction trap might have worked on a dickless wonder like Romney, but not Trump.

    Liked by 17 people

    • Hmmm... says:

      It’s such an obvious point that even they can’t paper over it. The narrative they were weaving of some brave prosecutors struggling to carry on this investigation despite mean tweets is ridiculous. My personal opinion is that Barr hammering home the point that they failed to make a charging decision killed that narrative as it is hard to accept they were hampered when they chose not to make a decision anyway. From a narrative perspective they were labeled as cowards from the start and so that killed any traction they could get from trying to portray themselves as being hounded by the President. For the obstruction narrative to work they needed to be sympathetic victims of the President’s attacks. Barr has a Trump like sense of how to read and diffuse the media.

      Liked by 2 people

      • We the people know says:

        Here’s the sum total of the traitors’ position on whether Trump obstructed justice:
        THEY DIDN’T PROVE HE DIDN’T DO IT.

        Hillary, on the other hand, DID do it. She’s been doing it her entire career. I bet if we could find some of the kids who went to kindergarten with her they would testify that she stole snacks, poured bleach in the fish tank, cheated at marbles and pushed kids down the stairs. She was born that way.
        They let Hillary off the hook because they couldn’t prove she intentionally had people killed, buried bodies all over the planet and destroyed evidence. No intent, even though the stench of rotting flesh follows her where ever she goes.

        PRO tip: Always link ALL these crimes…obstruction, destruction of evidence, treason, sedition, conspiracy, back to Hillary.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Lindenlee says:

        YES! Barr has that subtle, dismissive manner that doesn’t even deal with the evil ones as worthy of attention, which drives them crazy! They know that he knows more than he lets on, and keeps them guessing. Can you imag8ne all the calls back and forth in DC.. “Do you know him. What does this gesture mean? Is he serious? Can he be bought?”….

        Like

    • Sentient:

      “Bogus Reuters polls notwithstanding, I predict that that will be the eventual popular take-away.”

      I believe that poll as much as I believe that HRC genuinely won the popular vote in 2016 without voter fraud.

      Oh, they would have eaten MR like cotton candy. Few living politicians could have withstood what PDJT has. I do believe a rare few like Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan would have eaten their lunch too.

      Liked by 4 people

    • cthulhu says:

      This. And another absolute *fact* that is ALWAYS skipped over is: VSGPOTUSDJT knew from Day One that there was no Russia Collusion — so he knew from Day One that the entire investigation was a colossal waste of time and money. After two years and $30M, Mueller finally admits that there is no Russia Collusion and that the entire investigation was a colossal waste of time and money…….but wants to go after Trump for figuring it out before he did and treating the entire endeavor with the contempt it richly deserved?

      Liked by 5 people

    • Dutchman says:

      They never would have pulled it on the dickless wonder; hevis one of them.

      And what did he say “Russia is our biggest threat”? Hmmmmm

      Like

    • Issy says:

      OANN has a great agglomerate of romney quotes as he stumbles and fumbles his way through his diametric positions. He’s pathetic.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. graphiclucidity says:

    SD has the same type of evidence that Rosenstein, Mueller & Weismann, LLP have to prove their case:

    A consistent theory of a motive to engage in a conspiracy.
    Testimony in public acknowledging a conspiracy.
    Actions taken in public to perpetuate the conspiracy.

    Sundance is just following the new rules of criminal investigation and prosecutorial procedure now in effect in the United States. He’s also doing a better job at it than the conspirators are.

    Like

  17. Hmmm... says:

    The entire Mueller report reads like a copy and paste job from various NYTimes and WaPo articles from the past 2 years. The narrative coordination is so tight that their phrasing for almost everything makes it hard to differentiate between the two. Shem Infinite on twitter was doing some great comparisons when the report came out. Go follow him if you want to see someone expose how ridiculously tied together they are/were. The good news is that a chunk of these guys are gone now but just after they leave is when they try to weaponize the last of their information the most (see James Baker) so I expect some more BS in the next few weeks. I dunno how much more ammo they have though as most everything was deployed inside the report.

    Liked by 5 people

  18. David A says:

    Is Rudg G preparing a detailed response to this Mueller Dossier garbage?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sentient says:

      If I wrote a counter-report, I would point out that the Mueller report didn’t even mention that the two Russians at the Trump Tower meeting were hired by Team Clinton and met with Fusion GPS’ head Glenn Simpson both before and after the meeting. Kind of a glaring omission from Mueller’s report, no? Pretty much reveals the worthless nature of the “report”.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Perot Conservative says:

        Rudy said 3 meetings!

        Day before, day of, day after.

        Liked by 5 people

      • snellvillebob says:

        We also need to see Fusion GPS’s tax returns and bank records. Who else has been hiring them to look into the NSA classified database for them? Admiral Rogers found that 85% of searches by these contractors were not sanctioned by FISA warrants.
        Add Crowdstrike and Boze Allen to that.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Yes – due out next week.

      He should release a couple of pages a day on one major flaw at a time, triggering anticipation and widespread attention.

      Liked by 5 people

    • beach lover says:

      Yes… he said it will come out this coming week.

      Liked by 2 people

  19. Even I am surprised sometimes the lengths people will go to in order to keep their place at the taxpayer trough. We are well into treason, abuse of power, open criminality – the entire kitchen sink is being thrown in JUST to keep the wealth extraction out of us intact. Or even to slay the host altogether and feed off the carcass. The obsession with the un-earned is very real.

    Liked by 4 people

  20. Greg1 says:

    It would be GREAT if Attorney General Barr were aware that reporters had read, analyzed, contemplated, and had prepared to break down all of the report within ten minutes of it’s release………

    It would be even GREATER if a leak investigation were done on this!!!

    I seriously doubt anyone in the cnn audience even questioned this impressive ultra fast ultra retention reading that these two “reporters” did.

    If Tapper had any journalistic ethics, or plain old CHARACTER he would recognize the problem his statement made. Won’t happen. If he does recognize it, likely from reading Sundance’s post, he sure won’t come clean about it and admit the report was leaked by a Mueller lackey.

    Good catch, Sundance.

    Liked by 15 people

  21. starfcker says:

    Jake’s says a lot more than that. He says they got the report before it was released. He says Evan Perez has also read the report. They are getting sloppy in their excitement.

    Liked by 4 people

  22. mr.piddles says:

    From my perspective, we have two options:
    1.) Mueller report was leaked to CNN
    2.) Time Machine

    Just not there yet on #2. So #1 it is.

    THAT BEING SAID! Let’s play this out. Let’s say CNN *DOES* have a Time Machine at their disposal, and can obtain the full, unredacted Mueller report at any time, past, future, future-past, past-future, or whatever. If that were the case: knowing what they know now about where this whole Shim-Shamalamadingdong is heading, wouldn’t they go BACK in time to apply their future-knowledge to more effectively alter the course of history vis-à-vis the 2016 Election? The Time Machine story just does not add up. Once again: it must be #1.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. joeknuckles says:

    Read it? Hell, they probably helped write it.

    Liked by 12 people

    • beach lover says:

      Or have been in regular contact throughout this whole process, so who needs the final printing?

      I smell a rat in Don McGahn. Seems most of the obstruction implications come from his supposed conversations with the President.

      Liked by 1 person

  24. stats guy says:

    I finally broke down and read a small portion of the second volume. My blood pressure is slowly returning to normal. First the leftists who wrote this made sure to liberally quote press reports by name so that the vain actors in the media can look themselves up and see themselves as a part of History….taking down a President like Woodward and Bernstein. Bare in mind that this document will be a basic go to for historians to look at. So all the socialists believe that they have now entered the hallowed halls of a great Socialist Future…and they will be seen as the vanguard.

    Second. I read the first part where Trump’s crime is to raise objections to the characterization that Russia interfered with the election, thus de-legitimating his presidency. He is also guilty of disagreeing with the Press.

    The section ends on a rather murky note then launches into the Michael Flynn affair. One of Trump’s crimes here is a statement from him that it is good that Putin did not retaliate against the US because of the sanctions that Barry put on right before the inauguration. He is guilty of having a foreign policy that the left disagrees with.

    I pretty much quit there. If we had good Republicans who cared about this country a Fisking of this, along with some strong cross examination of Mueller and his henchmen would be a pretty picture…and really not that hard. Granted, too hard for those like Romney who kinda like the smell of socialism in the morning.

    Liked by 5 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      “[…] quote press reports by name so that the vain actors in the media can look themselves up and see themselves as a part of History”

      Something occurred to me earlier tonight… bear with me… Trump SHOULD go to the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner (it’s right around the corner, by the by). But ONLY on the condition that he be allowed a 10 minute monologue. I think you know where I’m going with this. Oh yeah… Sh*t Show Extravaganza, that’s what.

      Like

    • MustangBlues says:

      Good job. Spot on.

      Like

  25. montanamel says:

    Dang…
    I just put the jumper cables back in the trunk…I think the sponges and bucket are there too…
    Someone grab the battery out of the beast and let’s get to work…someone will talk or we’ll start using the 220 vac out of the dryer plug….
    Maybe we can just “leak” some of these leaker’s, eh?… a little hole here and a little hole there, let’s all the bad out of them….
    Just don’t catch anyone’s hair on fire this time….that was hard to ‘splain last time…

    Check-6

    Liked by 3 people

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      Not confined to CNN. The never Trumper Eric Ericcson
      was on a few hours after the press conference, citing
      things out of the Mueller report that made Trump look bad.

      Thought it was curious that he’d know exactly what to
      zero in on after roughly 3 hours after the release. Either\
      he’s the speed reader of all time, or the “proper people”
      all got their snippets of the 400 plus pages well in advance.

      Liked by 2 people

    • CHenie says:

      Doesn’t one actually have to be out hunting the enemy before check-6 is even a valid term? Fantasizing about stuff this serious is not helpful.

      Like

  26. avman1339 says:

    I believe that leaking an unredacted version would be a felony?
    Find the leaker(s).
    Bring charges.
    Publicize their perp walk(s) to prison.

    Liked by 6 people

  27. Greg1 says:

    Respectfully, the proof is self evident. Read all 448 pages, and be ready to appear on the teevee to discuss it. Time how long it takes you. If you can do it in ten minutes, fully prepared to debate it all, then Sundance will be proven wrong. If you can’t……

    They didn’t read the report in ten minutes. But Tapper says they read the full report. Only way that happened is if they got it in advance via a leak. With a lot more than a ten minute head start.

    Like

  28. Kent says:

    …you can’t unsee the kabuki strings….

    https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=JJu6XMqkJMe0tQW8mquQCQ&q=you+can%27t+unsee+the+kabuki+strings+conservative+treehouse&btnK=Google+Search&oq=you+can%27t+unsee+the+kabuki+strings+conservative+treehouse&gs_l=psy-ab.3..33i299.2541.22946..24907…0.0..0.193.5840.29j28……0….1..gws-wiz…..0..0i131j0j0i22i30j33i22i29i30j33i160j33i10i160.ZMUYubgcDso

    Liked by 2 people

  29. Sidney Powell says:

    Bingo!

    Liked by 5 people

  30. Sidney Powell says:

    Bingo!

    Liked by 2 people

  31. beachbum31 says:

    not one anchor/hour on CNN is drawing more than 800,000 viewers! that’s 15th on cable… more tune in to HGTV and Hallmark!
    Serious Question: how do they pay the overhead?? They cant be getting HALF what FOX gets, I’m surprised they aren’t showing public service ads half the time, their viewer numbers are so low…
    HOW DO THEY PAY THE BILLS??

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Your Tour Guide says:

    Not confined to CNN. The never Trumper Eric Ericcson
    was on a few hours after the press conference, citing
    things out of the Mueller report that made Trump look bad.

    Thought it was curious that he’d know exactly what to
    zero in on after roughly 3 hours after the release. Either\
    he’s the speed reader of all time, or the “proper people”
    all got their snippets of the 400 plus pages well in advance.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. This makes Jakie a PRIME SUSPECT as a CNN (Complicit News Network) CO-CONSPIRATOR.

    Like

  34. avman1339 says:

    So what is obvious becomes more obvious.
    This was not an “investigation”. Having 2 known, established reputation destroyers of innocent people, experienced pros at wrecking the lives of innocent people, both Mueller (D.C. anthrax case) and Weissman (Arthur Andersen) at the lead…
    When will the seditious treasonous TRAITORS face justice?
    We The People have been infuriated, our patience wears thin…
    Meanwhile the invasion at the southern border continues.
    How much longer, how much more can we take? Some PATRIOTS have stepped up at the border. There are other areas that need similar attention.

    Liked by 2 people

    • CHenie says:

      How much more can we take? Until people are physically locked up in a FEMA camp there will not be a proper response. That was the plan folks-until Trump won. But all the camps are still there conveniently located by railroad tracks. Impossible you say? I could provide dozens of links, but you still wouldn’t believe it.

      Like

    • Avman, Mueller May be the head of the snake but Weissmann is the venom.

      Like

  35. Bigbadmike says:

    Time to stop talking, and fo on offense. The President never colluded, so obstruction is a fools errand. Impeachment has always been the Kool Ade for the lunatics, Romney included. They don’t understand that 70% of the Country has the President’s back. As much as I hate the elites, I don’t want them jumping off buildings and offing themselves. They are in Hell and there is no refining it. They will Impeach, celebrate their empty victory, and then disappear into the morass of their hate. It’s Jonestown 2019.

    Like

  36. Sammy Hains says:

    Notice how the CNN chyron reverses the fundamental American value of innocent until proven guilty?

    Like

  37. Perot Conservative says:

    Sundance left out information.

    Laura Jarrett, daughter of Obama’s brain – Valerie Jarrett.

    Valerie Jarrett, who has LIVED WITH THE OBAMA’S for EIGHT YEARS.

    Which means Barack Obama and ValJar may have had the early report.

    (Was ValJar in the White House meetings of January 2016 or 2017?)

    Liked by 4 people

  38. Austin Holdout says:

    Not to speak for the owner of this blog, but to speak for myself, I don’t consider this site a “news” site. To my knowledge, the moderators have no special police powers to obtain user data, to use your example. CTH is a community of like minded people who get together here an share ideas, theories and sources. Sometimes we start with a connection, as the owner has done here, between an anonymously sourced news article that ran June 14, 2017, reaction to the news story on June 15, 2017 and how the reaction found its way into the Mueller Report. Typically, the community will help flesh out the idea with links to related stories or reminders about facts we have known but not put into this puzzle, etc. oftentimes, the owner will publish a post where he says “as we suspected (link back to this story) this new information proves …”.

    If you’re looking for a different experience, this might not be your “treehouse”. If if you want rock solid, fully researched news, maybe you could try CNN. (That was sarcasm-we do that here too). Again, just one community member’s thoughts on your post. Blessings and best wishes finding the right community for you.

    Like

  39. Newhere says:

    SD is taking Jake Tapper at his word. I know — crazy — but that’s what SD’s doing. (Sarc)

    And then looking backward from hindsight. How about anonymously sourced leaks that fomented fevered coverage for two years — all suggestive and not proof of any actual wrongdoing, mind you. The same information making up the “mosaic” of intrigue that is the Mueller report. Only the Mueller team could be the source of those anonymous leaks. Meanwhile, curiously “on point” headlines and tweets from CNN, WP, NYT.

    If you’re just tuning in, there’s a lot of catching up to do. You have to follow threads. Or just believe Manu “wrong date” Raju, and Valerie Jarrett’s daughter.

    Like

  40. Rileytrips says:

    These people are totally destroying what is left of our country… from within. I don’t know who is funding all this, but if they are successful, and gain more power, we will no longer live in a Democratic Republic with freedoms and rights. We need to fight back with all we have.

    Liked by 1 person

    • CHenie says:

      I agree let’s fight back with all we have…what’s your plan for this “fighting back” you speak of?

      Like

      • Kimmy K says:

        Maybe a postcard campaign to Barr letting him know that we know what REALLY happened, those involved and that we EXPECT justice for ALL involved? Up to and including U1!

        Let him know it’s PAST TIME to clean house, restore the rule of law and we DEMAND JUSTICE!

        Like

      • Voting would go a long way toward “fighting back.” Fewer than 50% voted in November 2018. All who did not vote raise your hand. Why not?

        Like

      • Rileytrips says:

        I vote every election, I attend the Republican run up meetings introducing the candidates before the primaries. I stay informed. I know my state Rep. and Congressman. I am going to meet my House Rep. for the first time next week. I call and email my Rep.s and Senators offices all the time about issues and my ideas to fix them. I write the President. I have even written our new AG. I don’t know what else to do!! I also am caring for my mother who has pulmonary fibrosis (in hospice care now), and have triplets about to graduate from high school. Scary times for all of us!

        Liked by 2 people

  41. jkcinsalem says:

    Like the Pentagon Papers, I fully expect the NYT or WP to print the entire thing. After all, advance book sales at Amazon are waiting. Utter rubbish.

    Like

  42. anthohmy says:

    I imagine there is a record of everybody who printed it.

    40 FBI agents vs a legion of Treepers. LOLZ.

    Like

  43. anthohmy says:

    A while ago I was in a situation with a lawyer who was kinda screwing me at the moment she wrote the agreement on the spot for me to sign. I was in a naive state of trust when I signed it. After it was over I was dismayed, foiled by a crooked lawyer, until I contemplated that she was under stress when she wrote it and of course she made a mistake or two. So then I looked for it and found multiple errors and she just thought she foiled me.

    That thing was only 5 pages long and the whole world wasn’t watching it and it was over esoteric stock options law not “obstruction”.

    For starters, are we going to find any documents SC withheld? To what degree did SC obstruct justice, now that Barr and Rosenstein agreed to apply their interpretation of obstruction of justice to the set of facts.

    Like

    • CNN interviewed me, at their invitation, at their Atlanta headquarters, regarding my CFTC case involving fraudulent sales and account management practices. CNN was ready to run the story until, lo and behold, the company in question commenced an advertising campaign on CNN which then quashed the story. I was eventually 100% victorious as were others I assisted. Besides paying up they had to rewrite their customer agreement. Many people were affected but CNN never reported any of it.

      Liked by 1 person

  44. 21leelee says:

    Intelligence agencies act like intimidation forces, not at all like justice or defence bodies. They need an overhaul, immediately if not sooner.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. farinc says:

    Why is POTUS not declassifying so that “we the people” can readily see what has transpired? Is it because he knows the Dems will say it’s selective since he didn’t declassify the Mueller report in its entirety? I’m really stumped by his indecision.

    Like

  46. farinc says:

    Why is POTUS not declassifying so that “we the people” can readily see what has transpired? Is it because he knows the Dems will say it’s selective since he didn’t declassify the Mueller report in its entirety? I’m really stumped by his indecision.

    Like

  47. CHenie says:

    I’m a Trump guy-make no mistake. I mean. for a Patriot, what other choice do we have? But something is just not right. I question Trumps non-action on the border. Do you know what he actually signed into law with the last trillion dollar spending bill? Expanded catch-and-release is one thing.

    I get this nagging feeling from time-to-time that we do not know the whole picture in terms of what “deals” were made for Trump to become President.

    Do you know that Hispanics will overtake blacks as the No. 1 minority voting block in 2020?

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/32063-pew-report-in-2020-hispanics-voters-will-overtake-blacks

    Hispanics think Americans are cowards-and they’re right.

    Like

  48. CanaCon says:

    Giuliani was talking about releasing their response to the report “at the right time”. Could it be they are waiting for the IG report first and, when the response is released it will include some declassified info?

    Liked by 1 person

  49. Jim Raclawski says:

    I just can’t say what I’m thinking as the end of HOLY WEEK draws close….. instead I wish each and every meatsack involved…. no matter how tangentially….. all the best for this EASTER….. and may each and every one realize their just rewards for the unconscionable actions they undertook these past 3years … ……….. go pound sand.. you filthy animals……
    (I can say that right?? it’s not hurtful if you say it and smile at the same time…. right?)
    GOD BLESS AMERICA…. POTUS and his family…. and all those that stand in harm’s way so we are safe…
    Semper Fi

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Another Ian says:

    That probably explains this

    “Democrats Decline to View Less Redacted Mueller Report”

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/19/democrats-decline-to-view-less-redacted-mueller-report/

    Liked by 1 person

    • TwoLaine says:

      Nah. Nutty Nadler and the other DIMs are too fat to walk to the SCIF and would have to learn to read.

      Like

    • GB Bari says:

      Obviously, the DemoncRATs already know what’s behind the redactions. Let’s not pretend the raw report wasn’t already widely distributed. Illegally of course but laws no longer matter to the antiTrump Cabal.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s