The Question No-One Seems To Ask…

Jon Solomon appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his latest op-ed in the Hill [See Here].  Unfortunately, two years of congressional investigations that go no-where; two prior inspector general reports that conclude with no corrective action; and two-plus years of in-our-face corruption by DOJ and FBI officials, does not lend toward optimism when the next best hope sold by Solomon is another Senate investigation.

.

Democrats do not miss an opportunity to take advantage of any angle where they can criticize, attack and weaponize a narrative against their political opposition.  So riddle me this… Somebody has been leaking congressional transcripts to Jon Solomon and The Epoch Times (Jeff Carlson).  The unauthorized releases include testimony from: Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, James Baker, Bill Priestap and, most recently, Trisha Beth Anderson.

Question:  Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?

expedited“?

September was five months ago.

The widely held view of the process is/was that Rod Rosenstein selected Robert Mueller as special counsel, and following that selection Mueller created his team. The perspective from CTH research is slightly different.

CTH believes that following the firing of FBI Director James Comey, the FBI Chief Legal Counsel, Jim Baker and FBI Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe; together with the corrupt small group that was involved in the prior year’s counterintelligence investigation; reacted to Comey’s firing by pressuring Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint their preferred person, Robert Mueller.

Within this internal debate (May 2017); at the time this construct was being argued; is when the famous comment from Rosenstein originates: “what do you want me to do, wear a wire?” The corrupt FBI investigative crew; having initiated and continued “Crossfire Hurricane”; including people from the DOJ-NSD side (Ohr, Weissmann, etc) were pressuring Rosenstein to appoint a special counsel….. but not just any special counsel.. Baker and McCabe had the person pre-selected. That person was Robert Mueller.

Obviously we can see the reason for this FBI/DOJ crew to need a special counsel. As career corruptocrats they were operating from a mindset of mitigating risk to themselves and continuing to advance on the objective to attack the executive office through their investigative schemes. The key point here is subtle but very significant. Robert Mueller didn’t select his team, the corrupt team selected him.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Agitprop, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, TowerGate, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

459 Responses to The Question No-One Seems To Ask…

  1. PgtSndThinker says:

    Some call me Pollyanna…I hope these revelations of congressional transcripts are put out there by a “White Hat” stealthy communications team. To go one step farther, if they are polite white hats who hope the black hats repent, maybe they have warned the bad guys of the upcoming (secretly legal?) release of truthful information and downstream consequences. If so, the black hats aren’t surprised and their best option is to redouble their efforts to change the narrative and hide the truth.

    Liked by 10 people

    • buanadha says:

      There has been a lot coming out since Whitaker became the AAG and Barr was announced. I’m a Pollyanna also, but I think the prospect of an AG with oversight prompted the other side to start spinning and leaking to position themselves politically, but that some of our side are fighting fire with the same means.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Amy2 says:

        Still waiting on that IG report regarding FISA abuses!

        Liked by 3 people

        • grlangworth says:

          Actually, I would like the Mueller report to be released so that the IG is no longer constrained by the limitation the SC placed on his access to documents. Then the IG report on FISA abuse will have a chance to be less biased.

          Liked by 8 people

          • RKEESX says:

            CORRECT. MUELLER’S INVESTIGATION IS A COVER FOR THE DOJ AND FBI.

            Liked by 5 people

          • Amy2 says:

            Oh I’m waiting on the Mueller report too! But you are right about the timing.

            Like

          • mopar2016 says:

            Was hoping for a second special council more than a year and a half ago. Gave up on it.
            I figured it would take a couple of years for the truth to get any traction.
            The real Russian collusion conspiracy is with the dem party.
            https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/429292-the-case-for-russia-collusion-against-the-democrats
            This stuff has been obvious for years but it doesn’t get any coverage.

            Liked by 2 people

            • noswamp says:

              The media is complicit as we all know. They have not suffered any consequences for their supporting people that have committed crimes against the country and state. I think they will.
              When that happens, the media jumps ship and everything changes. Until then, we all suffer.

              Like

          • Dutchman says:

            Released, maybe but NOT neccesary, in order for I.G. to be freed up to investigate. The ‘block’ is “interfering with an ONGOING INVESTIGATION”, so, technically, once mueller team are thru INVESTIGATING, and are simply writing up there report, the IG would NOT be ‘interfering’ in an investigation, nor would releasing the documents.

            Like

            • noswamp says:

              I don’t know about that. I read somewhere that the AG in New York will indict some Trump people the same day Mueller finishes his investigation. Therefore the swamp will still ensure that Trump is ensnared by “on going investigations” well into 2020 and anything Trump does would be “obstruction of justice”. I am sure his attorneys are ready for this though.

              No joke.

              Liked by 2 people

              • tucker7518 says:

                The Russian collusion story is going to be a big disappointment for the Democrats, and it is running out of steam..

                Like

              • bentley1blog says:

                noswamp…are you really sure his attorneys will be ready for this?? Where have they been hiding so far? Nothing but guest appearances to appease the believers who feel they will come to the rescue of our POTUS. Very heavy hearts witnessing this takeover of our beautiful country.

                Like

        • BigTalkers says:

          I’m still “Waiting for Godot.”

          Liked by 2 people

      • RLTW says:

        Yes. You are a Pollyanna. And it’s not your fault. No one out there in the civilian world can possibly comprehend the extent to which the FBI and DOJ are utterly and systemically corrupt.

        Just ask the FBI Agent who had a FISA on a Chinese subject and in the last days of the Clinton Presidency, guess who popped up on the FISA? President Clinton himself calling and offering to handover US missile technology to China in exchange for a 1 million dollar donation to the Clinton Presidential Library.

        This was back when the Clintons were amateurs, before the Clinton Foundation was founded, before they could demand $150 million dollar donations from Russia in exchange for 30% of our strategic uranium. Should I give up the Agent’s name? Shall we convene a military tribunal where the Clintons are tried and convicted of treason, blindfolded, stood up in front of a wall and shot for treason? Or maybe simply electrocuted like the Rosenbergs?

        Bobby Three Sticks would necessarily be standing beside the Clintons on that firing line.

        How about the FBI investigations back in the late 90s into military aged Muslim Males who were taking airliner flight lessons but were not interested in learning how to take off or land the airliner. These Muslims who committed the 9/11 attacks were taking flight lessons in WA State, Arizona and FL. Investigations were opened by the FBI Field Offices in all three of these States.

        FBI Management SHUT THESE INVESTIGATIONS DOWN! WHY!!? An FBI Agent from the Phoenix AZ FBI Field Office was so outraged that he wrote a memo to FBIHQ stating that someday these Muslims subjects are going to fly airliners into the WTC! He predicted EXACLTY WHAT HAPPENED!! This memo is famously known by the old school FBI Agents as the “Phoenix Memo.”

        The Clintons, Bobby Three Sticks, Louis Freeh and the Bushies are now added to the firing line.

        The 9/11 attacks and the ensuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could have all been prevented if those FBI Agents were allowed to continue their investigations. Millions of lives destroyed or lost. And for what? 7 trillion dollars in profit is for what. War is the biggest business in the world. This is why President Trump is being fought tooth and nail from pulling out of Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria by both the Republican and Democrat side of the aisle.

        This goes way beyond simple corruption. This is pure unadulterated evil. All in the name of profit.

        Liked by 17 people

    • Linda K says:

      I believe the don’t ask because they don’t want to attract the notice of the public to what is happening. In the same way, no one is discussing Northam’s horrendously callous comments about infanticide. I

      Like

  2. AccountabilityPlease says:

    The schemers choosing Mueller makes sense and explains a lot, especially the anti-Trump composition of the team. It implies that Mueller is a figure head whose purpose is to give maximum flexibility and cover to the people already engaged in Spygate. Therefore, the debate about Mueller’s party affiliation and integrity are pointless. He’s there to collect a paycheck first and foremost, but you can bet his instinct will be to protect the institution.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. Appalled says:

    This is a question I have: Why has no one interviewed Amy Dacy, CEO of DNC at time of alleged hacks?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ken Lawson says:

      Why would it matter? I can’t imagine getting the truth from a Democrat anyway.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Christine says:

      The same reason Mueller hasn’t interviewed Julian Assange, to whom Podesta’s emails were leaked – the truth (the server wasn’t hacked by Russia or anyone, but rather leaked by a DNC insider {most likely Seth Rich}) would destroy the entire muh Trump Russia myth in one hit!

      Liked by 14 people

      • TPW says:

        So why didn’t Trump communicate with Assange ….I hope he has

        Liked by 3 people

        • De Oppresso Liber says:

          Congressman Dana Rorhabacher spoke with Assange at some length 18 months ago, or somewhere around that time frame, and returned to Washington to meet with President Trump. We have no idea what information, if any, the congressman obtained, or if any of it has been used.

          Like

        • MelH says:

          Trump has been against Assange. Congress sent someone(a Democrat, as I recall), I forget the name, to speak with Assange. He went and returned with no coverage of the trip. There weren’t even reports that there was an attempt at coverage. if President Trump is the brain we all think he is, why didn’t he offer Assange asylum in exchange for information?

          Like

    • farrier105 says:

      Amy Dacey would just repeat what Crowdstrike’s people told her and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She wouldn’t know anything more. It is doubtful Schultz knows that much. What you have to realize is the DONOR INFORMATION was stolen, but Crowdstrike originally told the DNC people and Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post that the donor information was not even ACCESSED by the alleged Russian hackers. One day after Nakashima’s report is published, Guccifer 2.0 shows up and publishes donor information and complains that WAPO, on word from Crowdstrike, reported that the hackers ONLY STOLE TWO FILES of opposition research about Trump. No emails were stolen.

      GUCCIFER 2.0 CLAIMED HE STOLE THE EMAILS AND GAVE THEM TO WIKILEAKS prior to June 15, 2016 when Guccifer 2.0 made these claims. WHO WAS GUCCIFER 2.0? For whom did Guccifer 2.0 work? Some people who claim Seth Rich stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks claim Guccifer 2.0 belonged to Crowdstrike or the DNC themselves. If so, this either eliminates Rich as a suspect, or changes his role considerably if he was involved at all. If Guccifer 2.0 is DNC, then Seth Rich acted under orders.

      The people who claim Guccifer 2.0 belonged to the FBI (that’s my impression), and still think Seth Rich is responsible have even more questions to answer as it complicates things beyond Occam’s Razor tolerance. No one can assume Rich did it under DNC orders and still did it out of patriotism or love of Bernie Sanders. Seymour Hersh’s FBI source, as recounted on the Ed Butkowsky tape recording, claimed Rich SOLD the emails to Wikileaks and that he was not killed because of the emails.

      Whoever controlled Guccifer 2.0 stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks. By publishing the emails at Wikileaks, and then creating Trump-Russia-Wikileaks, Assange is no longer a journalist, but a Russian intelligence asset. He can be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. Assange is no longer covered under the precedent of UNITED STATES V. NEW YORK TIMES–The Pentagon Papers case. That is a strong motive to suspect intelligence people arranged to give the emails to Wikileaks.

      Like

    • farrier105 says:

      The real person to grill would be MICHAEL SUSSMANN, the Perkins Coie lawyer who picked Crowdstrike in the first place, and made this statement about–in essence–why an Incident Response against hackers should proceed with great caution:

      “You only get one chance to raise the drawbridge,” Mr. Sussmann said. “If the adversaries know you are aware of their presence, they will take steps to burrow in, or ERASE THE LOGS THAT SHOW THEY WERE PRESENT.”

      Now, Sussmann is supposedly an expert in cybersecurity/Incident Response. What Crowdstrike did was an Incident Response engagement. There are Best Practices in Incident Response that only mention one thing about the logs. The logs are part of the forensic evidence that Crowdstrike must preserve for law enforcement. You can preserve the logs by copying and moving them OFF NETWORK. You don’t have to just let them sit on the network and let Russian hackers decide when to erase them. Actually, since one group (Cozy Bear) was allegedly in there for a YEAR, they should have been erasing the logs on a daily basis depending on how many days each week they spent rummaging thorough totally worthless information. You would erase logs after each foray into the network as any IT personnel with access could get into them at any time. Sussmann should know this since he is an expert, or so we are told.

      There was no reason for Crowdstrike to sit there from May 5, 2016 until June 11, 2016 and just watch as documents got exfiltrated as they claimed they did, just to “protect the logs from the ‘Russians’ deleting them.

      1. Crowdstrike claimed they knew the hackers were Russians on May 6, 2016. All they had to do was do that very weekend in May what they did on June 11 and 12, 2016. Disconnect from the Internet and switch out all the machines, or reimage all of them. That would have eliminated the problem at least initially since it was claimed the “Russians” got back in during July.

      2. Copy the logs regularly and move them off network on a portable storage device.

      Crowdstrike was in control of that network from May 5 until some date in July 2016. This should not be forgotten.

      Like

  4. The Akh says:

    I’m not sure I get the suspicion around Solomon himself. If you ever read the comment sections following his articles at The Hill, the commenters almost universally attack Solomon’s character and accuse him of being nothing other than a pro-Trump propagandist. But then here, people think that somehow he is up to no good too? Is the assumption that the only way he could ever have access to this information is through somebody who is trying to shape a narrative to nefarious ends? But I honestly don’t see the evidence for that. Also, in his latest article, he highlights the Skolkovo Project, Clinton’s direct involvement and influence of the project and the associated controversies. That isn’t information known to most people, but it is likely central to the corruption surrounding Clinton and her private server especially. That information hasn’t come through leaks, but through the piecing together of multiple reports and public knowledge. How could this information entering the public conscious be of any benefit to the Deep State, Clinton cabal and their ancillary corruptocrates? Please tell me what I am missing.

    Liked by 11 people

    • WonkoTheSane says:

      If the problem won’t go away, make it bigger. Straight outta the swamp playbook.

      Liked by 4 people

    • rogerdat says:

      Solomon is still writing under an opinion tag at The Hill…………the rest write under ” news ” when the content isn’t favorable to Trump.

      the dam will break, the public will see what Nunes has been adamant about revealing.

      Liked by 8 people

    • justlizzyp says:

      I think the suspicion is more that he (and Sara Carter) have been fed some extraordinary bombshells – why and by whom would seem to be a very important question. Are they being spoonfed selective info as part of some bigger plan? Are they being used/ set up? What is the motivation of Solomon’s source(s)?

      Liked by 5 people

      • BebeTarget says:

        I would like to think at this stage (so tired of EVERYTHING) that there are white hats who are also tired of the corruption and just want to get the truth out. Maybe to them, Carter and Solomon seen to be the most trustworthy.

        Liked by 5 people

        • justlizzyp says:

          I would like to think so too. Otherwise I want to curl up under the covers and cry.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Dutchman says:

          There are very few reporters, or “news agencies” that would report such “leaks”; we’ve seen lots of reporters,and agencies “kill” stories that didn’t further the liberal agenda. Solomon, Carter, Herridge, we know the names.
          Point is, there are only a FEW reporters, or news outlets that would “print” such material.

          The final dialogue in 3 days of the Condor; “How do you know they will PRINT it?”

          VERY prescient.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Firefly says:

        I think the motivations are to keep us glued to the tv watching Hannity for an hour only to get a tidbit of information to string us along. This is just like Hannity in the Hillary investigation – just wait justice is coming. We’re being managed/handled. The left msm tell their people PTrump is getting it any day now- along with tidbits with their spin.

        Hillary and Obsma are being protected. Whitaker stated in the congressional Horowitz and Huber are looking at the carter fisa. No mention of the list of things including uranium one that are supposed to be investigating.

        Liked by 4 people

        • We’ve been managed for decades while republicans, elected as conservatives do nothing but slow walk progressive policies through Congress. They have resolved that it is the best they can do without the progressive media taking them out, and given they possess no real ideology other than the retention of their seats, we find ourselves at this late date, with nothing but Trump who is attacked daily as a right wing extremist for pushing ten year old democratic policies. Meanwhile republicans are more likely to side with democrats on most policy issues or simply fight among themselves accomplishing nothing except a delay in progressivism.
          The FACT they they could not fund a wall, pass immigration legislation or reform Obama care, tells us all we need to know. They have no intention of legislating conservative agendas.period.

          Liked by 2 people

        • dawg says:

          @Firefly, BINGO!

          Like

    • Mark McQueen says:

      IMO there is a lot of negative bias against certain sources involved in some of these suspicions.

      Like

    • Annie says:

      It’s like you read my thoughts, Akh.

      Like

  5. Blind no longer says:

    I see what you are saying Sundance, but if it was only the scheme team, then why did Rod Rosenstein go in to an interview with Mueller for FBI director?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Linus in W.PA. says:

    Question: Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?”

    Maybe the simplest answer is that these leaks show facets of criminal and near-criminal activity, and the democrats don’t want to add the visibility by publicly rallying against them.

    Now, if that’s the case, it is surely a coordinated effort among the bad actors, so I hope that they are being closely monitored for cover-up activities.

    Liked by 7 people

    • G. Alistar says:

      I thought the same. Last thing Schiff and company need is more publicity about their corruption. Not at all confident they are being watched at all. Not at all confident that they are doing anything coordinated. They are idealists, but not coordinated and certainly not brilliant planners. Addicted power and money rather than any moral ideal.

      Liked by 3 people

      • justlizzyp says:

        As long as they can keep it contained to conservative outlets and The Hill’s ‘Opinion’ page, they can deem it ‘not credible.’ If they talk about it it becomes ‘legitimate’ news.

        Liked by 6 people

        • Bullseye says:

          Maybe they haven’t kept it just released to conservative outlets but the story is being ignored at main stream outlet. Just say’n

          Liked by 1 person

          • justlizzyp says:

            That’s what I was trying to say – if they can keep it confined to the ‘far right’ and the ‘alt right’ and the ‘wing nut’ sites, they can ignore it. I’m quite sure that’s why Solomon’s work suddenly shifted to the “Opinion” section at The Hill. It’s all about de-legitimizing opposing views.

            Liked by 1 person

    • MrG says:

      Yeah-and when they do try to impeach the POTUS and these stories resurface , the Dems can say “That’s old news and it’s been debunked”

      Like

    • bentley1blog says:

      linus…hope that they are being closely monitored for cover-up activities. By whom pray tell?

      Like

  7. ResoluteVTEC says:

    It’s almost time for us to break out yellow vests of our own

    Liked by 9 people

    • Sam says:

      Almost? By the time enough people comprehend what is happening (and just as importantly, what isn’t happening) it will likely be too late.

      Like

  8. dave casper says:

    I believe at the end of the day at least 75% of our country, and the world if you will, has sold out to satan, and that’s why i’s so hard to fix our problems. Whatever the % might be isn’t important, what’s important is that those who do believe hang in there, the Lord will be here soon.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Kim says:

      It is the human condition, which can be summed up by saying that humans are greedy and selfish. It is necessary for humans to have these emotions, or they will die young or live a limited life. I have a lot of cats around where I live and they are semi-wild. Access to food is limited. Cats that are born with a non-pushy personality usually won’t make it to young adulthood. They are not greedy enough.

      In small groups, at the hunter-gatherer size, greed and selfishness – including greed for status – is not such a big problem. After all, there is only so much to be greedy about and in small groups people are heavily dependent on cooperation. And if you are a chronic trouble maker, or lazy, you can just have a mishap on the ice. If you are cowardly in war, then that can go very badly for you too. So people will usually moderate their behavior because cooperation is a scarce resource too.

      Beyond cooperation, if you want to enslave someone and take their surplus product, that is difficult in a hunter-gatherer situation. You need settled agriculture to make slavery worthwhile.

      Which makes me wonder if democracy is some kind of attempted proxy for cooperation. Or just a tool to get it.

      The ego drive to dominate has always existed and can create terrible results for humanity – see Alexander the “Great”, or the entire cult of “honor” related to Roman politics and militarism – but the complexity of our society is what allows our egos to be so weaponized.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. ALEX says:

    Solomon report on Schiff and Simpson was a nothingburger

    Liked by 3 people

    • Blind no longer says:

      The almost full and complete picture of the absolute corruption and attempt to frame and destroy Donald J Trump has been surfacing for over 2 YEARS now…and yet crickets from the Enemy of the People. The MSM in this Country, must be completely and 100% destroyed to actually have the truth come out…along with the FBI/DOJ and other corrupt institutions in our banana republic!

      Liked by 15 people

    • Elle says:

      The Ukrainian, Serhiy Leshchenko, was found by a court in Kyiv of illegally meddling in the U.S. election by publicizing the disputed “black ledger” about Paul Manafort.

      wait..whaaaa???

      Liked by 2 people

      • Firefly says:

        Notice how all msm not covering this- even Fox News, Bongino, brietart, Tracy Beanz…it’s like Hillary and globalists are being protected. The friction with the party affiliation is all just kabuki theatre- handling of both sides to fight rather than look at what’s really going on.

        Like

    • Mark L. says:

      This is well worth your time to reviews Lee’s efforts.

      Like

  10. Daniel says:

    Question: Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?

    It’s because they don’t want it discussed. It is really that simple. The media also doesn’t do a lot of talking about it either. We see this at every turn. The real reason the Democrats need the Virginia governor gone is because of the abortion policy and explicit details given to the public. The fact that many Democrats have already come forward supporting this policy is the destruction of the Democrat party itself. The only way to fight against it is (1) redirect attention and (2) quit talking about the damaging stuff.

    The leaks damaging to the Democrat side cannot be denied because they know whoever has been doing this cannot be “Seth Rich”ed and knows a lot more damaging things. So long as the media cooperates and refuses to report, they feel like they might still be safe.

    In short, “The Streissand effect” would result in far more attention on themselves than would otherwise happen. It’d just make things worse for them.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Shop says:

      Or the leaks benefits them by creating so much he said-she said that 99.9% of the American public have no idea what actually happened and are fed up that they’ve completely tuned it out. PT adds to this confusion by constantly tweeting witch hunt but takes no action when the folks running DOJ & FBI & CIA are all his appointees.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Cache says:

        Surely you can accept that a good section of the “Career” people at these agencies are solidly on the Other team? Trump is being roadblocked right and left within his own administration, much less the government as a whole. This is why Trump is moving slowly. I am certain that behind the scenes, certain white hats are working like crazy to clean up the mess.

        Liked by 2 people

        • MelH says:

          Mulvaney, being interviewed by Chris Wallace yesterday, thinks he knows exactly who leaked the president’s work schedules, but Mulvaney says, “You have NO idea how impossible it is to fire a Union member in the White House.” He did use the word “impossible”!

          Liked by 1 person

    • RJones says:

      @daniel – I think your theory is reasonable, just not consistent with way these people work.

      SD is correct to point out that nobody is challenging these leaks and charging Trump with obstruction or DOJ with coverup. The collective evidence is all focused on specific individuals in FBI/DOJ. There’s little or nothing leaking about anyone higher up, most importantly NOBODY IN CONGRESS. This even though, by their resignations, there were obviously traitors and likely far worse (Feinstein, the Pakistani crowd, God only knows what else). Couple all this with new AG being swamp-sanctioned, it all STINKS.

      President Trump looks to be edging right up to destroying his brand with me and everyone I know. I would urge him to carefully consider what he is agreeing. He should know that we truly do not care about the wall, China, Eu, taxes, judges or any other stinking thing except that these f@ing criminals go to jail and preferably then be executed. When this problem is solved, all the others can be. Without this, no other problem is solved except temporarily.

      President Trump, do not sell us out. My support will evaporate instantly the minute I smell I’ve sold down the river.

      Like

      • Trump is trying to save the country, not burn it down.

        Like

      • Daniel says:

        It is consistent with the exception that they are not creating any new distractions to match them. But with the current national distraction found in Virginia, I think we can agree that dumpster fire is distraction enough.

        As for not caring about the wall, China, Eu, taxes, judges or any other thing? I think you’re quite mistaken.

        You seem to think of Trump as the demolition man. Look at how he handled the old post office building in DC. He made use of what was good about the existing building and trashed the rest to make a great and historical hotel. While most would have demolished and built something new, Trump did something better and more creative.

        Don’t get me wrong — I definitely want to see a bunch of heads rolling. Their swollen, arrogant heads roll so much better than average heads. But doesn’t the absence of the things you mentions (no indictment of Obama and others and none of congress?) speak to something else? Yes and no. The easiest way to understand the purpose of Mueller is to keep the president separate from the DOJ and FBI. Once Mueller is done, that separation will be done.

        Like

        • RJones says:

          @daniel, I think your underlying assumption is that, given enough distractions, all the bad news gets stale and people eventually lose interest. But, two years later, many of us are -pick your word – at the criminality of the Obama/Clinton crime gang, at the viciousness of our own government agencies, most particularly intelligence services, and at the blatant level of treachery exhibited by our elected officials. Throw on top of that, the apparent willingness of republicans to NOT fight in elections and that of democrats to cheat in vote counting. Cleaning this crap up and restoring integrity is what matters.

          I understand Trump is a force for good. And the things he is working on are beneficial, to the extent they are not turned around the second he leaves office. But, he he’s making deals to avoid impeachment and conviction by the Senate, this would be a mistake and nothing but short term survivorship of benefit to nobody by Trump.

          It would be far better to let them do to Trump what they will and let us take over from there. If we do not do our job, what’s the point? We’ve elected republicans first to the House, then the Senate, then the President? What’s left for the people to be in control of the government versus the other way around?

          So, again, President Trump, do not sell us out.

          Like

  11. AccountabilityPlease says:

    Simple answer to your question: If the Democrats were to complain about the leaks, it would force the MSM to cover it and draw attention to the information. That would serve to quickly discredit their BS and unravel SpyGate for the masses.

    Liked by 17 people

    • All Too Much says:

      Best answer I’ve read here so far.

      Liked by 2 people

      • rayvandune says:

        Yes, when I read it, the answer was so obvious that I was certain I had somehow misunderstood the question!

        The real power of the corrupted media is not so much in spreading lies, but in spreading profuse layers of irrelevancies to give the illusion that the truth must be in there somewhere. Read a typical NYT or WAPO “bombshell” and you will find a huge meandering mess of meaninglessness that took three or four authors to produce the sheer volume of it. But unless you are an experienced skeptic, you will be convinced that it contains revelations! You just won’t be able to remember any of them in a half hour.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Judith says:

          The sheeple are exhausted. They don’t care anymore who is right or wrong, so long as they just make it STOP already!

          The plan was to bombard us daily, til we didn’t know which way was UP. And, for the most part, it worked.

          Liked by 2 people

    • AModerateMan says:

      Bingo, the Democrats control the media.. they know the best way bury these leaks is to not talk about them at all!

      Liked by 2 people

  12. Shop says:

    What has PT done about the IG review since he sent out those tweets last September?

    Like

  13. Boots says:

    Burn. It. Down.

    Liked by 5 people

  14. concerned3 says:

    What we are watching is a political play choreographed to make the (common citizen) believe that he has an open and functioning government. Ask yourself, have you seen any of the dozens of co-conspirators indicted, prosecuted or jailed. This government is broken, it depends on selling the masses, a believable story line.

    Have you seen any of the FISC Judges call people like Comey in to answer for his crimes – signing for the Carter Page FISA warrant for example. How about Rod Rosenstein, who also signed the Carter Page FISA warrant, etc.

    You know, the facts and they have not changed. We just watch and hope that someone, will in someway change the open corruption.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. ForGodandCountry says:

    There is an additional reason, to those stated above, as to why Democrats are not pursuing any leak allegations or charges. And that’s because they themselves are guilty of leaks, and in pursuing such charges against others they open themselves to charges of leaking as well.

    This is one of those times the answer is quite obvious and Sundance could easily have answered it. I am certain he knew the answer and the question was a rhetorical one for us to discuss.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Christian Warren says:

    To answer the question posed by Sundance, I imagine the leaks are occurring to provoke Trump into losing his cool and retaliating against the leakers. He is well-known for his confrontations with subordinates. If it can be shown that he is helpless to stop the unauthorized release of confidential information, his enemies will become emboldened and his supporters demoralized.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. srmikeinohio says:

    Hope this isn’t considered too far off topic..
    But Something I have noticed . Haven’t heard anything from Joe Gigenova, Jay Sekulow or Rudy Giuliani lately.. They have been very quiet, wounder why??????

    Liked by 5 people

  18. saywhat64 says:

    I thought the plan was that all the unclassified transcripts from the behind door House Investigations were to be released in December. My money is on some of the Republican House Investigation committee members as being behind most, if not all the leaking transcripts.

    I would be curious to peruse a list of all the people who would actually have the access to these transcripts .

    Liked by 1 person

  19. chojun says:

    Answer: The FISA abuse/SpyGate fiasco is toxic to the Democrats, UniParty, and permanent administrative state, and their allies in the media (all of media, including Fox News). Any leaks about this is dangerous to them. The only acceptable narrative is no narrative. Also, the safest way to drain an ocean is a drip at a time. I believe this is why the information has been dripping out steadily over the past 2 years. The steady leaking is the easiest way to conceal the torrent.

    I believe this is why a relatively obscure media outfit like the Epoch Times has been leaking the transcripts. Congressional sources likely have been trying to get these out but no-one in the mainstream media is willing to take the scoop.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Zorro says:

      “but no-one in the mainstream media is willing to take the scoop”

      Right, it’s not WaPo and/or NYT writing about this leaked information and we know which side they play for.

      I’m thinking someone(s) is very frustrated and desperate about the realization that the Deep State has the upper hand on POTUS, through obstruction charge threats and other things like the IG fizzle. With greatly decreased hope of that anything will happen, they decided to take action.

      Liked by 3 people

  20. trapper says:

    Let’s play a game. The dogs that aren’t barking. Why not, indeed?

    Try this: because the congressional lickspittles for the Clintons/dems/no-border/one-world-governmenters have been leaking it themselves. But we thought they were trying to hide it, so that doesn’t make sense. It’s a contradiction. However, since there are no such things as contradictions, that means we have made at least one false assumption.

    Perhaps the false assumption is that they want to hide Democrat/Russia collusion. Perhaps “they” (the globalist/no-border/one-world-governmenters) want the Democrat/Russia “collusion” to come out, and they have been steering us there, building the suspense, teasing it, setting up Tump/Russia as just an outer coating to be eaten through. The big reveal coming soon. But why?

    Try this: the Democrat/Russia collusion is not the crime. It’s the cover, a gigantic misdirection. The Clintons and their crew are masters of misdirection. Red herring purveyors par excellence. Remember the billing records? The travel agency firings? Misdirections all.

    So, what are they trying to misdirect away from? What is so huge that it would take a Dem/Russia collusion distraction to hide it? I think I know. Information is out there, you just have to let it in. Hint: Loral.

    Occam’s razor does not hold in the wilderness of mirrors these players inhabit.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Mr. Morris says:

      Trapper, I think you are onto something that has been staring us in the face for a long time.
      Mr.Schwartz of Loral,was a major contributor to the Clinton’s. President Bill Clinton allowed Loral’s sensitive missile technology to be transferred to China. $$$$$$involved.
      HSBC Bank whose chief council was Robert Muller, sheltered $100 Billion in client funds. I believe the money laundering operation involved drug dealers and arms traffickers money. HSBC Bank contributed to the Clinton Foundation.
      Frank Guistra, (a huge donor to the Clinton Foundation), and Bill Clinton engineered the purchase of 20% of United States uranium assets to a Canadian Company who then sold it to Rosatom, a Russian Company tied to Vladimir Putin. The deal was Uranium 1. The sale of America’s uranium assets was approved by Pres. Obama, Secy. Of State Clinton, FBI director Robert Mueller and other Obama Administration officials. President Clinton received $$$$$$$ for a speaking engagement in Russia.
      How does transferring American assets to China and Russia and shielding weapons and drug traffickers monies help the United States?

      Liked by 2 people

  21. My personal opinion, fwiw, is the “Sword of Damocles” is hanging right above the cesspool call the dnc, the dem/repub? concritters, and Muellers staff.

    Leaking things about what something has done in the past does no good. I believe that the morons are TRYING to get ahead of the curve and JS is being fed some info. Not a lot BUT salient enough to cause everyone to rethink their positions. That is why there is a whole lotta whoha on Ol’ Nellie and Pondesta and by extension Manafort. The track through Manafort is dried up (in lock down) AND THE ONLY THING LEFT IS ALL OF THE SUPPOSITION(S) OF THE PLAYERS…

    I believe that PDJT is causing more than enough people to start squirming because when BARR gets confirmed, the dems don’t come to the table, there is no budget for him to sign…ONE GETS:

    THE PERFECT STORM: ONE PRESIDENT DONALD JOHN TRUMP!!! BECAUSE HE IS THE STORM!!!

    P.S. I don’t pay a lot of attention to the goings-on of the underlings but WHAT IS GOING ON AROUND THEM. If one studies enough people, one will find out WHO is doing what and that is the person one takes out!!! 30yr Military!!!

    Like

  22. thegoosefish says:

    I’m going to suggest perhaps Robert Carlin, Mueller’s favorite, who I would not know without the early CTH summaries, made a personal request for it to be Mueller. He had a lot riding on his decision to approve the dubious Carter Page “Russian Spy” FISA warrant. All the while knowing Page had done work for the FBI. He’s been quiet as a mouse.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. davidsstones says:

    So what if Baker and McCabe told Rosenstein to appoint Mueller?… An agenda is set for Mueller, a predetermined ie; run this out until Trump quits or, keep Trump from releasing unreacted reports by keeping the investigation open until 2020.

    There’s no gain by Democrats, the FBI or the DOJ to close Mueller’s investigation. Is Mueller their *protection*? ie; just preventing Trump from releasing unreacted reports because as long as Mueller’s investigation is open they’re safe in plain sight.

    Evidence appears to prove the DNC rigged the 2016 election. 2018 was evidence for most conservative voters. In 2016 Democrats shock and anger convicts them. Certainly they plan to double down in 2020. Tump will win again of course. They don’t know that. So perhaps Mueller’s orders are to run this out till 2020 convicted by pride, anger and hatred that they can make sure Trump loses in 2020 and the redacted reports which would send them to prison disappear overnight. Was 2018 a dry run testing new methods to “win” elections? We won’t know. GOP and voters flinched at the tens of thousands of ballots discovered weeks later but no one did a thing about it except in Florida and Georgia.

    Here’s my question, what is it these people have that secured Mueller for 4 years to do what they placed him there for? They have a goal. Mueller is an expensive Security Guard.
    Forget the $30 million public funds paid. There’s either bigger money or information being traded.
    What if it’s information on Mueller? Or?
    These aren’t ordinary cutthroats, they’re FBI with top secret information, they carry guns, they break down doors at 1:00 am and 6:00 am. The DOJ doesn’t carry guns; they’re the inside paperwork people.

    I think of an *FBI* inside the official FBI. Members gone rogue.
    It’s very reasonable to expect the FBI runs Deep State.
    The rest of the Deep State certainly doesn’t run the FBI.

    What if the *FBI* has or would fabricate information to trouble a Mueller?
    What if there’s a plot within a plot?
    A plot to direct and control Mueller, within a plot to contain Trump?

    Mueller’s systematic destruction of lives, but only of the people who helped get Trump elected, so they can’t help again in 2020, is likely the loudest display of how their preferred game plan.
    These experts in destruction aren’t going to prison for using metal weapons.
    They create confusion and deception by lies and innuendo and unsupported leaks to get to the same goal as death; silence a person to die in prison. They have all the technology to fabricate and a strong motive; it’s them or someone else that goes to prison. Someone who could get Trump elected again.
    Eliminate honor and the repitious bookends of how hard upright members of the FBI are.
    They’re ordinary humans with weaknesses and ego’s, fears and fantasy’s.

    Like

  24. Firefly says:

    Here’s an interesting youtube by Lee Strananhan. I’ve been fed up with John Solomon and Fox News. Lee might have a point that Fox News is dis info targeting PTrump since they know he watches.

    Liked by 4 people

    • bessie2003 says:

      Wow! Had not seen this, but he speaks of things my little intuition was wondering about.

      Liked by 1 person

    • GB Bari says:

      I don’t know anything about Lee Stranahan but he seems to not be a fan of Solomon (or worse). I this periscope Stranahan did answer my question as to why Solomon is published in the The Hill. Solomons is the vice president of digital video (besides being an opinion contributor) for The Hill. I could have found that out with some research (duh).

      The fact that other reporters / journalists at The Hill complained about Solomon’s conservative bias last year was (IMO) a “plus” in his favor. So I’m still going to read his articles since he appears to not be trying to smear PDJT with fake news. But I will read with caution, as should everyone nowadays.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Terri says:

        Lee Stranahan was a long time contributor for Breitbart News and a staunch supporter of Andrew Breitbart. He was a host on Sputnik news and may still be? His investigative reporting is always very detailed and if you can keep up with his frequent ramblings he is quite insightful.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Mark L. says:

      Lee does his homework and doesn’t pull punches.

      Like

  25. ltravisjr says:

    I still don’t know why Rosenstein had wanted Trump to let him resign and why Trump wouldn’t allow it. If it’s for “leverage”, can someone at last show me where that’s working because RR and the deep state haven’t changed a bit since then.

    Anyone? ANYone????

    Liked by 1 person

    • thegoosefish says:

      Because it would come across as Trump actually fired him or suggested he resign or whatever they twist it into, implying that he is trying to direct the investigation. You don’t want to hear that for weeks nonstop do you?

      Liked by 1 person

      • ltravisjr says:

        Yes, it would come across that way, and be a PITA to hear about. It would have to mean RR was trying to goad him into making a move that would get criticized, b/c if RR truly wanted out, he wouldn’t continue to behave “swampy” knowing what DT has over him. Thiswould be the closest (indeed the *only*) possible explanation I have heard so far. Still, it seems a pretty weak reason for DT to let RR stay on and get away with all he continues to get away with, especially as transparent the deep state’s motive that would appear at that point.

        Like

    • Maybe, just maybe, only VSGPDJT knows that answer.
      Don’t underestimate President Trump; that’s all for now!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      Whitaker established Trump’s “leverage”….even over BARR.

      Trump using the Vacancies Act took a non DC former US Attorney and public skeptic of the Mueller probe and made him Mueller’s BOSS.

      Whitaker testified he has been read into everything: SCO, OIG, Huber and probably more.

      Whitaker got to take a peak at the opposing player’s cards.

      What will Whitaker do now that his tenure is ending and he will be a “civilian” again?

      Liked by 3 people

  26. Noble Jones says:

    Thank you for your continued analysis, Sundance: Nothing else seems to make sense . . .

    What is baffling beyond comprehension is why in the H_ _ _ there is no criminal and counter-intelligence investigation into the DNC, Clinton Foundation, and HRC campaign collusion with Russians and other foreign entities?

    Why is it that this all seems to be one way, when overwhelming evidence points in the exact opposite direction? Massive amounts of evidence that the actual fraudulent activity was committed by the DNC, the HRC campaign, and Dem congressional and Senate members to prevent DJT from being elected and framing him if he did win the election.

    Many of them lied to FBI and congressional committees, yet NONE have been charged or seemingly even investigated. Comey, Clinton herself and her husband, her staff members, Clapper, Brennan, Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, Orr (2x), Lynch, Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie Law Firm, ad infinitum. All of them either lied, leaked classified information, or colluded with foreigners to affect the election and/or the “investigation”.

    Are Nunez, Burr, Graham, etc. impotent? They actually KNOW all the answers, they have seen ALL the evidence, and yet, they do not seem to be capable of bringing about a valid investigation. They let the sham Mueller team continue to ride roughshod over the entire thing.

    And what about the thousands of good and decent FBI agents and intelligence personnel who know the truth, yet are silent.

    The only plausible explanation I can fathom is that FEAR is a powerful weapons and the now Progressive/Marxist Democratic party has learned to perfect it’s use to accomplish their nefarious purposes.

    And now you have the Dem-led committees, like the Judicial Oversight Committee, which demonstrated yesterday as they interviewed Mr. Whittaker, that they have one objective in mind and that is the demise of DJT. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee actually said to him that they (the committee) are not the guilty ones, inferring that DJT was (and Whittaker by association). In their minds, DJT and anyone associated with him is already guilty. No due process, no evidence needed. They said so, and therefore it is true.

    Adam Schiff intends to do the same thing. He has been proven wrong multiple times, but none of that makes any difference.

    These people have no conscience, no shame, and no moral compass.

    WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICANS? What is holding them back? Methinks many of them are in the same boat. DJT has dumped on their gravy train and they want to be rid of him as much as the Democrats.

    I can only hope, as I’ve heard, that POTUS knows everything as well and is holding back until the right moment to release it all. This man has more patience and backbone than I have ever witnessed in my lifetime. He does not even seem to be affected by the whirlwind of evil surrounding him. He needs and deserves our continuous prayers.

    I use to think, “surely, the Democrats know that this works both ways and it will come back to bite them”. But, my thinking has changed – They are working on multiple fronts to assure that there will come a day that there never be any opposition. Through the criminalization (or threat thereof) of any opposition and the wholesale nationalization of voter fraud, they will never have to worry about any. That is why they so vehemently oppose Voter ID laws and any effective means to stop illegal entry into this country.

    My prayer every day is that our righteous God would pour out his grace and mercy that we do not deserve and spare our country from eminent destruction and protect our president and our Republic. Otherwise, the shadow is already cast . . .

    Apologize for the long rant, but all this is maddening beyond imagination . . .

    Liked by 5 people

    • thegoosefish says:

      It’s crap that has been done for years, decades, but people are just now finally “woke.” It took Clinton’s absurd private server and he contempt of the deplorables to wake us up. Trump talking bluntly added fuel. The burn it down feeling that many of us felt prior to the election is still within us. And there are thousands of sleuths now, in blogs, in Twitter, this site is a big one for me. It’s a big movement, with millions of Americans participating, and the media is fighting a furious counterattack with twisted reporting. How it all shakes out is anybody’s guess.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cache says:

        Agree that there has never been so many of us in possession of real knowledge before. This really is a sort of enlightening of the sheep and should frighten the Liberals into submission. They aren’t cowed in the least, though.

        Could this be a real fight to the death then, so to speak? If Trump wins this battle, many will see prison, have their vast wealth wiped off the board, and even more will lose power—the horror!

        Our President also has earned our precious loyalty. The Dems never expected that we’d fight for him or strike out at those leaders of our own party whose actions need reining in. They never expected us to stand tall and support the President.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Noble Jones- that is an EXCELLENT post. You bring up many great points. Right now it is our President Trump vs. the World.

      pic.twitter.com/1ahbqXrXlc

      Liked by 5 people

    • There is not investigation because the republicans are still not in charge of the DOJ because of the incompetence of AG Sessions. This is the Obama DOJ. When Barr takes over we will see, but I know that will be the first time Trump has had his own AG. Acting AG Whitaker is a place holder who is just there and is being very careful. I don’t blame him so much because I don’t know all of limitations he has since he is only acting AG in the midst of the Obama DOJ. We will see…

      Liked by 1 person

      • John-Y128 says:

        Barr is not Trump’s own anything, Barr is another recommendation and about the only person who would entertain taking the job, time will tell, I think he’ll produce an ‘executive summary’ of Mueller’s report for public consumption and sweep the rest under the DOJ carpet.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Beth02 says:

      My sense on why PDJT is withholding and why this corruption has not and will not leak into the public in any meaningful way is because the establishment has made the case to the President that the FISA and NSA Spying program will be wrecked if this goes public. In order to assist the establishment, the media has the assignment of making PDJT such a pariah that even if it comes out people will say “well he’s so awful, he deserved it”.

      There is no doubt in my mind that the Obama administration (higher ups) were spying on a very long list of politicians and public figures. The American public would be literally rocked if this came out. The program would be destroyed and the country would be made extremely vulnerable.

      WIth regard to the Dems and “it works both ways”, I think the Dems have really drunk the kool-aid. They are completely lost. The party is overwhelmed by corruption – thus we have the socialists are taking over the Party. They no longer have a moral compass. They’ve no rational thinking ability anymore. They have not demonstrated any concern for their future or the future of our country. I state that with no enjoyment – and deep sadness.

      What I don’t understand is why the R leadership, the DOJ, FBI, etc. put something in place to prevent another administration or corrupt bureaucrat from doing this again. My guess (based on the stunning statement by Paul Ryan recently – that he had no idea until last fall that Nunes was on to something serious) is the majority of R’s don’t have a clue how bad the abuse was.

      But then again where in the heck is Rand Paul on this?

      Perhaps Barr is being placed to do this?

      If they do not get a handle on this soon, we’re (citizens and politicians) headed for alot of trouble. The amount of corruption (personal and political) that exists in our society today is surreal. We are at a tipping point.

      Liked by 4 people

      • noswamp says:

        “The American public would be literally rocked if this came out. The program would be destroyed and the country would be made extremely vulnerable.”

        Shocked but not rocked. And most of us already know. Millions already have a sense of the wrong these folks have done. So I do not think many, even the Dems, will be shocked.

        Like

        • digleigh says:

          I think you may be right, …Americans from all sides , ALREADY, think the intels are corrupt from the 911 truthers, to the lefties who grilled Mueller during the Bush admin., the anthrax case, the Enron 9-0,”Licensed to Lie” book,Senators (Feinstein getting spied on by Brennan who lied about it), Clapper’s lies, Snowden, Wiki, and Schumer who told us….”take care, Trump as the intel knows six ways to SUNDAY HOW to get BACK at you…” ( It is known as a revenge ridden, and spying agency against American citizen teams)! I think more know and we may not be so adverse to a complete change, and house cleaning!!

          Like

      • Everett Miller says:

        To double team the novice Trump while he still imagined there is some semblance of Patriotism and honesty in the US Government.
        I wonder if he knows better even now.

        Like

      • rayvandune says:

        The more the government practices withholding or manipulating information, the more the people are beaten down by living in a lie, and the ones who know it is a lie are the worst victims. We are all familiar with the statements about the effects of the people being forced to live a lie. That is us. We live surrounded by people who know no better than the lies they see on TV, and we are being disheartened by our inability to get through to them, and of course by made to look like crazies. We have a champion in the White House who almost alone has the power to bring down the temple of lies… and yes it may crush him too. But history will eventually judge his response to this existential crisis… assuming there are any free and honest men left who can write it!

        Like

    • TPW says:

      So when are we going to organize to put a stop to it? someone has to know someone……like I said I do not believe sarah carter and now solomon is suspect….Hannity is an idiot paid way too much and in over his head……he doesn’t have enough sense to fight his way outta of wet paper bag…. this is sad people.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. Brix says:

    It is either a “good guy” – someone who wants the truth to get out for the good of the country – or it is a way for the corruptocrats like McCabe, Comey, Warner, Lynch, Brennan, Clinton, et. al to be innoculated when the information comes out in court… when it is “legally” made known… and those in the Democratic Party who would be damaged by the information can say, “this is old news… nothing new here…. move on….” which is being abetted by the media not reporting on it now…. It never really gets out, then when it could get out it can be claimed to be stale, not newsworthy….

    Like

  28. Paco Loco says:

    God, give us some justice please. The dirty Democrats are hell bent on destroying our sovereignty, our booming economy and American culture in general. Spygate was a treasonous operation to damage POTUS, with the FBI, CIA and NSA facilitating the treasonous acts. No justice! The neverTrumpers that dropped out of the Congress did so specifically to let the Dems take back the House…more treason. No justice! How long can POTUS withstand the withering attacks from the Dems and MSM? If it’s no deal on the wall funding this week, then Trump is going to have to decide if hes going to pursue executive action to secure the border. It looks like the shit will hit the fan this week.

    Liked by 5 people

  29. Carson Napier says:

    An0maly @LegendaryEnergy
    Joy Villa wears a “Build The Wall” dress at the GRAMMYs! 🏆🇺🇸
    2,448 5:19 PM – Feb 10, 2019
    921 people are talking about this

    Liked by 8 people

    • Blind no longer says:

      She’ll be lucky if they let her in the door.

      Like

      • Dutchman says:

        Bnl;
        Thats why “build the wall” is on the BACK of the dress; this is not her first time.
        From the front, you wouldn’t realise the pattern is bricks,..not until you see the back, and by then she is already IN.

        Liked by 1 person

        • tucker7518 says:

          She got into the Grammys. The Grammys were actually good this year. They honored Dolly Parton who looks great, and Diana Ross who is turning 75. There was no Trump bashing, unbelievable.

          Like

    • Judith says:

      I’ll never watch that crap again, but good on her for daring to be different! The rest of them are sheeple. BAAAAAH.. BAAAAAH..

      Like

  30. konradwp1 says:

    ”Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?”

    It’s a good question to ask. You could also ask: Why are only selected portions of the transcripts being released? Or: Why does Jon Solomon keep repeating the lie that the FBI’s activities against Trump only started in July 2016?

    The answer to all three questions is the same. The Deep State is fighting a desperate rear-guard action to re-frame their narrative. They are trying for “Limited Hang-Out”. Some wrong doing will now be admitted, the names of the guilty the public know will be used and they hope the public will be appeased. Jon Solomon is obviously trusted to help the Deep State frame their new narrative.

    But the “Limited Hang-Out” is not going to work. The reason the names of the guilty are known to the public is due to new media. The establishment media is just playing catch up. At this stage any attempt at the harm minimisation game is just going to make things worse.

    In new media the public know: Fusion GPS was an FBI approved contractor. Nellie Ohr was working for Fusion GPS in December 2015, researching the travel of persons close to Trump, hoping to catch them meeting “suspicious persons”. Also in December Strozk and Page texts indicate OCONUS lures being organised for some purpose. Also in December Admiral Mike Rogers is allerted to FBI contractor abuse of access to the NSA database.

    December 2015 is where the operation against Trump starts, and the crimes just get worse from there. There is no way create a new narrative that provides limited hang-out for the guilty while including all the known facts being talked about on new media.

    Liked by 4 people

    • konradwp1 says:

      I will add this:
      The reason the Deep State and the Democrats want to frame a new narrative with limited hang-out is because they can see the whole “Russian collusion” narrative in full collapse. To their horror they realise that they can’t “Get Trump” on Russian Collusion that never happened, and worse, they can’t impeach him on any lesser matter until their attempts to bring him down with the Russian Collusion story are explained away. They can’t move on to their next attempt until they’ve extradited themselves from the Russia mess.

      So their new narrative is that yes, Fusion GPS was paid by the Clinton campaign. Yes, Nellie Ohr was working for Fusion GPS doing opposition research. This produced a dossier that was later found to be salacious and unverified. ”But at the time”, they will claim, ”the allegations against a presidential candidate were so serious, we had to open an investigation”. Then the usual hand flapping ”Mistakes were made, procedures weren’t followed, blah, blah blah …”. They will certainly add ”It wouldn’t have gotten so out of control if Trumps public comments hadn’t exacerbated the situation”.

      The democrats, and the establishment media were involved in accusing Trump of colluding with Russia to steal the election. The Deep State did far worse. They illegally spied on Trump and tried to manufacture Russian Collusion for their spying to find. To end this witch hunt without destroying themselves they need a narrative explaining away of how they came to falsely accuse Trump and why the investigation started.

      Jon Solomon is playing along with this plan. But it’s not going to work.

      Liked by 2 people

  31. thedoc00 says:

    To answer the question why nobody asks the question about Democrats and Russian collusion, there are many high ranking neverTrump Republicans or Republican Family members who swing with them. Its why we have grown accustomed to calling the congressional caucuses the Uni-Party.

    Not only is there plenty of Russian collusion but one can add huge portions of Chinese and Middle eastern collusion to the conspiracy stew as we.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Lotta Pete and Repeat tonight…………….

    Like

  33. Tparty says:

    “Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?”

    My first thought was the democrat uniparty is allowing the republican uniparty to prepare the the sheeple(D) for a dispointing conclusion in the Mueller report and the sheeple(R) a few pelts to hang on the wall before a bitterly divisive 2020 campaign.

    Like

    • Tparty says:

      Divide and conquer. That’s what it’s always been about. I will know when we are getting close to freedom again when I don’t see both parties making accusations of racism, low IQ or anti÷americanism and find common grievances against Globalism and the uniparty

      Like

  34. One comment that Solomon made that has not been aired sufficiently is that Mueller and his team of crooks had exculpatory evidence EARLY ON which was not used. Not a surprise to us, but should still be aired as widely as possible.

    It is horrifying that so many people still have absolutely no clue about the utter corruption in our government. A friend of mine told me tonight that the middle school where she teaches she was the ONLY teacher (out of 75 total) to watch the SOTU. Why she asked–the answer was, well Nancy Pelosi said not to watch.

    Ok I know about NEA but how to penetrate the ignorance? We could get the GND championed by Occasional Cortex as a default because so many are disengaged and occupied with cr*p entertainment, devices, shopping (and yes, some real life issues of course). It was not always thus.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Screaming eagle says:

    Deep State operators are unelected. Their jobs used to be hinged to who the next administration will be. Make no mistake, they learned long ago to start protecting themselves no matter who comes to power. Think of the tools they possess?

    Like

    • Dutchman says:

      Screaming eagle;
      Beg to disagree, although in your post, you don’t clarify when you mean when you say “used to be”, but it was a LOOONG time ago.

      The professional buerocracy developed civil service protections, so there WOULD NOT be a wholesale firing and hiring, every time we had a change of administrations. And, it made sense for continuity of Gov. to have a professional civil servant workforce, experienced at making the trains run on time, etc. and “Political appointees” that work “at the pleasure of the President”, and can be fired at any time for any or even no reason.
      With Obama (perhaps earlier) a process of ’embedding’ began i.e. initially hiring a political appointee, but then ‘transferring’ them to a career position, prior to the administration (President) leaving office.
      This, along with more and more “political appointee” positions being required to be Senate confirmable, is why it is,so difficult for PDJT to HIRE who he wants to hire, and FIRE who he wants to fire.
      Its Policy and Procedure, and therefore ‘in the,weeds’ details, for most Americans.
      Like how Mueller corrupted the FBI, with the “7 and out” policy on station chiefs, which enabled him to remake the FBI.

      No one noticed, except those IN the FBI, but it had a devastating effect.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. franuche says:

    Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?

    Because they know that someone could leak a live stream of Mueller, Rosenstein, and HRC raping a litter of kittens and nothing would happen to them.

    Like

  37. Johnny Dollar says:

    “Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?”

    I’ll take a stab at this.

    1) Releases (leaks) are bad things. For democrats to publicly speak out against bad things, they would have to speak from the high moral ground. Democrats are uncomfortable speaking from the high moral ground. And seldom, if ever, attack from the high moral ground. Primarily because the high moral ground is not viewed as likely to deliver the kill shot they’re looking for.

    2) They’re could care less what Solomon says. Or what Sara Carter says. (my guess is they do care what Kimberly Strassel says). Solomon and Carter have been making a living on whats going down with Mueller, the FBI and DOJ. And those subjects, to the public, are today, as somebody posted earlier, old news. Moribund. Democrats know this.

    3)They’re preoccupied with managing the very big screw ups of their own… children, you might say. Northam, Herring, Fairfax, Cortez.

    That’s my take.

    Like

  38. Ellen A. Lopez says:

    Why, right before the special counsel appt, did the president meet to interview Mueller for the FBI head when Mueller was not eligible to serve in that position having already done so more than the 10 year term limitation?

    Like

  39. justbikertrash says:

    Disinformation is what I see. They are throwing out easily discreditable (Because they made it up) so they can use it as an example to discredit the truths that come out by painting them with the same brush.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Judiciary says:

    I keep imagining that the 74 year old Mueller stays home in his PJ’s, like RBG, while other people, particularly Andrew Weismann, run the show, er, witchhunt.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. Another Scott says:

    They aren’t because then they would impart credibility to the Epoch Times and the rest

    Like

  42. Anonymous says:

    I too am curious and concerned about the leaks. I like getting them. But am not happy about them not just being published as is. Also, we hear all this 64D or leak “sting” theorizing from wishful thinkers when it would help us. But it is not impossible for leaks to be investigated or for our side to be stung as well.

    I really hope it is not Nunes leaking this stuff. Not accusing in any way. Just hope he is not getting frustrated. I just like him the most in this entire episode and want nothing bad for him. At this point, I have Nunes above the President in my who I am happy with (e.g. the declassification fiddle, shutdown fiddle, etc.)

    The most powerful insight from the article is the lack of outrage by the Democrats. I agree that is curious. It could be them trying to get stuff out to water it down in future. Clinton hang out strategy. Could also be that they have some future leaks which will be more damaging to our side and are getting these out first. Don’t know.

    Could also be Occam’s razor and someone on our side. Bottom line is that it is someone not playing by the rules. And not even manning up and saying who they are.

    Like

  43. Chip Doctor says:

    All I know is that the nightly Solomon, Carter tick tick boom thing on Hannity finally made me completely give up “news” on TV. Haven’t watched since a week before Thanksgiving. Interesting thing is that now I don’t watch anything on TV. And I am much happier as a result. I didn’t think I could live without it, but now I can’t imagine going back into slavery.

    Like

    • Blaze says:

      Sara “my sources say” Carter is certainly the right-wing version of Fake News. I can’t stand the women and her over-hyped crap. Hannity is about the only place she is allowed and he is pretty close to a supermarket right wing tabloid. Thankfully we have OANN to set the record straight.

      Like

    • Terri says:

      I haven’t paid for cable tv for ages. I use Roku to watch You Tube podcasts, home/garden and animal shows. The dogs enjoy their cartoons when I leave them home alone!

      Like

  44. The question no one ever asks is what is the crime being investigated? Mueller and Rosensrein need to account for that question, theories aside, counterintelligence is a BS excuse for a special council, those reports are not public and prosecutors do not run CI investigations, investigators do. I am sick of this narrative. Whitaker needs to shut it down and call RR and Mueller into the Senate to account to the scope and beginning of this farce.

    Like

  45. Sundance–>Question: Why aren’t the democrats framing a political attack narrative around these unauthorized, unlawful and unethical releases?
    Answer : The Democrats already know it’s way too late for that. The best thing they can do is continue on with the Narrative and with the aid of the MSM, FUHRER Nancy Pelosi’s new ‘Rules of Engagement’ & the continual use of “Rules for Radicals” #’s 8, 10, 11 & 13 is imperative.
    ~The Democrats have no other choice.~

    Like

  46. Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

    After further reflection on Whitaker’s testimony on Friday……I think I now understand what a masterful stroke it was by POTUS.

    And it may go to answer SD’s question.

    Whitaker IS Trump’s LEVERAGE.

    Trump took a guy who was publicly skeptical of the Mueller probe…….AND MADE HIM MUELLER’S BOSS.

    I never understood how POTUS NOT declassifying was some form of leverage when POTUS didn’t even have the documents.
    Whitaker’s appointment was far far better:

    PDJT was able to legally place a guy in the opposing team’s locker room.

    Whitaker by his own testimony stated he had been read in on
    the Special Counsel Investigation
    the Inspector General investigation
    John Huber’s investigation
    and probably
    McCabe and Baker cases

    With Whitaker leaving as his appointment was temporary……

    TRUMP’S LEVERAGE EXTENDS TO WILLIAM BARR.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. rrick says:

    The question is easy to answer; because the leakers, the leaks, and the recipients of those leaks are not the political opposition. In fact, every of the aforementioned are aids to – co-conspirators in – the objective to dismantle a legitimate presidency. In other words, it is a Coup D’Etat. Whether it is a ‘soft’ or ‘cold’ coup is semantics. A coup is a coup. A coup acts to delegitimize the rule of law.

    I would like to see any serious rebuttal to the above. Lacking such rebuttal the claim of a coup remains standing. So, what is it we do about it? ‘To arms!’ is one possible solution. Yet I think of that as a bit part of the general strategy which is to arrest all who are associated with the attempted coup. Waiting on politicians is nuts. The People have the legitimate right and the duty to take swift actions to protect and preserve our Republic.

    Like

  48. digleigh says:

    birds of a feather…. Mueller is no angel….

    Like

  49. MaineCoon says:

    What data from the leaked transcripts will be used in the impeachment hearing by either side?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s