Number Five – Jr. Senator Kamala Harris Announces Presidential Bid…

Appearing on Good Morning America, the first term junior senator from California, Kamala Harris, announced her intention to run for President of the United States in 2020. (video here)

“I am running for president of the United States,” she said. “And I’m very excited about it.” 

I’m sure she is.

Due to her cognitive incapacity to contrast reality against the manufactured media nonsense, Senator Harris will almost certainly be the left-wing media’s initial favorite. However, as noted within the Kavanaugh nomination hearings, Harris will push any media narrative regardless of how false and ridiculous it appears. She will most certainly do a big embarrassing stupid thing which will eliminate her from the race.

The 54-year-old senator has no original thoughts; has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues; has zero substantive accomplishments within her background; and relies upon a wide circle of influence and branding agents to tell her which direction is best to achieve political gains.  In short, she is a purposeful/useful idiot within a uniparty wing so structurally Machievellian she will be an easy mark to set-up by the machine.

As the AP notes: “[Harris] abandoned the formality of launching an exploratory committee, instead going all in on a presidential bid.” “She plans a formal campaign launch in Oakland on Jan. 27. The campaign will be based in Baltimore, with a second office in Oakland.”

Knowing it’s likely the ♦UniParty DNC is following a similar ♦UniParty RNC strategy, we  can start to put the personal characteristics and political traits together and contrast them against 2016.  Here’s the way it looks so far:

  • Senator Ted Cruz was to 2016…. as Senator Elizabeth Warren is to 2020
  • ♦Governor Jeb Bush was to 2016 as….
  • Senator Marco Rubio was to 2016 as….
  • Governor John Kasich was to 2016 as….
  • Senator Lindsey Graham was to 2016 as….
  • Governor Mike Huckabee was to 2016 as….
  • Senator Rand Paul was to 2016…. as Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard is to 2020
  • Dr. Ben Carson was to 2016 as…
  • Governor Chris Christie was to 2016 as…
  • Governor Scott Walker was to 2016 as…
  • Senator Rick Santorum was to 2016…. as Senator Sherrod Brown is to 2020
  • Governor George Pataki was to 2016 as….
  • Governor Rick Perry was to 2016…. as Senator Kamala Harris is to 2020
  • Governor Bobby Jindal was to 2016…. as Julian Castro is to 2020
  • Carly Fiorina was to 2016 as….
  • Governor Jim Gilmore was to 2016 as Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is to 2020

Once we get a few more names on the DNC side, we can start to have fun with the celebrity squares graphics.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

508 Responses to Number Five – Jr. Senator Kamala Harris Announces Presidential Bid…

  1. amwick says:

    She should explain why she is eligible to run for president. She is a lawyer right? She should know about something that important!!! *spit…

    Liked by 7 people

    • WSB says:

      From Wikipoo:

      “Kamala Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, California, to a Tamil Indian mother and a Jamaican father. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, was a breast cancer scientist who immigrated to the US from Madras (now Chennai) in 1960.[4][5] Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University economics professor who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at University of California, Berkeley.[6][7][8]”

      Lots of ‘splaining’ to do.

      Liked by 7 people

      • YESSSS!!! Like what part of the Constitution that the 14th Amendment VERY SPECIFICALLY STIPULATES “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.” Also “born of PARENTS”… A lot of readers miss that word “PARENTS”…IT IS A REAL GOTCHA!!!

        This is going to be fun!!! Place you’re bets as too who goes down first and who falls last@@@ This is going to be a real hoot!!!

        Liked by 3 people

        • G. Alistar says:

          Perhaps more relevant, Harris is one of several who will sell out to the far left wing of the democrat party making them un-electable in 2020. Paradox: Either lose the nomination or lose the election. Still, the dems would be hard pressed to nominate someone less trusted than Hillary.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Randolph Scott says:

          sure pal, we are a nation of laws. haha. The Democrat party says, ‘laws are meant to be broken’. Until the criminals are prosecuted and sentenced anyone with a name could be elected by the democrat party. The named person does not have to be intelligent, know anything and can even be a criminal, the democrats will elect them. After all they made sure a worthless lying POS community organizer was elected for president.

          Liked by 1 person

        • montanamel says:

          This sounds like fun… I’ll take a 4-pak… 2 squares in from sides, and top and bottom rows, those are MINE… $5 a square… OK???

          OR…we can do a card for different “things”…ie: WHEN are they going to drop out of the race?…nearest date spoken for wins the “line/person”…$2/date…I’ll take every Monday In May/June/July of this year and Apr/May of 2020…

          Another card for Last person besides the actual candidate running vs Trump…$5/sq…

          Another card for “when the sex charges are first made” for the guys…?? ETC.

          More popcorn…softer seats…bigger drinks… Check-6

          Liked by 1 person

        • WSB says:

          Would love for everyone to tamp this down until after the primaries and in the general, if this dud even has a chance.

          Like

      • mamajen says:

        Meh. Barack Obama is ineligible as well and that went nowhere. The people who brought up the legitimate Natural Born Citizen issue were lost in the crowd of birthers.

        Liked by 7 people

      • amwick says:

        From what I read quickly, neither of her parents could have been citizens when she was born. Neither were here long enough. I think any citizen has standing to make a legal stink about this. Grrrr They ignored this issue in 2016.

        Liked by 3 people

        • MAGAbear says:

          But the dimms will scream “racist” is anyone challanges her eligibility. She probably plans on using that to advance herself in the demonrat primary. Playing the victim card goes a long way in leftist circles.

          Liked by 1 person

          • amwick says:

            So, can a single voter have standing? That is something, a legal thing, I just don’t quite understand.
            I don’t think eligibility is ever challenged seriously.. Not to SCOTUS, and that is the problem. A YUGE issue that they will not touch.

            Like

        • WSB says:

          Is Camela able to be a Senator?

          Like

      • Pale rider says:

        What! You racist? that’s her defense.

        Liked by 2 people

      • davidb says:

        @WSB…….Ol Willie Brown will help her “explain”.

        Liked by 2 people

    • WSB says:

      What is really funny about this is that President Donald Trump has standing, if I am not mistaken.

      Ha!

      Liked by 6 people

    • piper567 says:

      amwick, ozero was never called upon to explain why he was eligible to run for President.
      She has more experience than he had, she was CA AG!
      These little details make no difference to terminal ideologues.

      Liked by 1 person

    • law4lifeblog says:

      She apparently was banging the married Willie Brown for years. Don’t tell me THAT’S not work. She has earned this, just not in an upright position.

      Liked by 1 person

    • GenEarly says:

      “The 54-year-old senator has no original thoughts; has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues; has zero substantive accomplishments within her background; and relies upon a wide circle of influence and branding agents to tell her which direction is best to achieve political gains.”
      Sounds like Obamy’s resoome’ she’s a shoo in for the DemocRat nominaton. Now to just get Mittens Romneycare to get the Repub Rino sElection again and then “throw the election” Again! Welcome to the USSA.

      Too bad Trump is around throwing monkey wrenches into the Swamp’s Political Estab Apparatus

      Liked by 1 person

  2. webgirlpdx says:

    The ultimate Dem nominee will still be a white guy.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. pocaMAGAjunta says:

    “…Harris will push any media narrative regardless of how false and ridiculous it appears. She will most certainly do a big embarrassing stupid thing which will eliminate her from the race.”

    Still waiting for ONE of a multitude of “big embarrassing stupid” things to have consequences applied to Dem politicians or their media masters.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Iamrerun says:

    That was an AMAZINGLY creative and accurate description of Harris. Well put, CTH. Cant wait to share it.

    How does somebody this awful and pathetic get convinced that this is a good idea? (Rhetorical).

    God, please help save our country and our way of life from people like Kamala Harris.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Al Brown says:

      Rerun aid
      How does somebody this awful and pathetic get convinced that this is a good idea? (Rhetorical).
      Here is how.
      I was 20 something and working for a now defunct major engineering company in Birmingham. I read the WSJ everyday and looked at the local papers. Someone in a Group asked a similar question and I told them all the answer:
      “I can go to the Break Room right now and have my pick of 20 or so copies of the morning daily and 20 copies of the evening daily. They will all be in pristine shape, complete and unread, sitting there……Missing their sports sections.”
      The answer is, we let them do it.
      There is a verse somewhere in the Bible where soon after the family of Joseph says, “Come, let us arise and go sell ourselves for food.” where they also acknowledge
      Through our ignorance we have lost our Country.”
      BTW I didn’t miss the sports sections they were usually in the mens room.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mikeyboo says:

      She figures she was elected DA in San Francisco , California Atty Gen, and Senator from the formerly great state of California. Why wouldn’t this arrogant POS think she can make it to the Presidency. I’m only surprised Alexandria Ocasio Cortez isn’t running-yet.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Coast says:

    “The 54-year-old senator has no original thoughts; has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues; has zero substantive accomplishments within her background; and relies upon a wide circle of influence and branding agents to tell her which direction is best to achieve political gains.”

    Yeah, but Boy George Stepalloverus and Robin Robotics sure did like her.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Niagara Frontier says:

    Hopefully, some posers will jump in on the Republican side. We wouldn’t want the Dems to suck up all of the media oxygen in the primaries, would we?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Tom says:

      You are kidding right? Mitt “binders full of women”,is basically already running. As if we needed more proof he was a political tool that never had any intention of winning in 2012. Look at the way he threw the last debate.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. ForGodandCountry says:

    What are the betting odds that Michelle Obama runs?

    (Note I said runs, not wins)

    Can I safely disregard this possibility? Please??

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Mike in a Truck says:

    Oh look-another Black Supremacist wants to be President.

    Liked by 6 people

  9. Ernest Marsalis says:

    SD just described B. Obama circa 2006.
    An empty suit/useful idiot for the DNC/Media/Global complex.

    Liked by 6 people

  10. Chewbarkah says:

    “The campaign will be based in Baltimore, with a second office in Oakland.” She’ll be lucky to survive the summer, much less be elected.

    POTUS is the “Chief Executive”. Excluding her work under Willie Brown, list Kamal Harris’s executive experience.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. KentR says:

    Very cheap comment about Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. The thinking and attitude go to why Trump has a hard time getting over about 40%. His most ardent admirers are obnoxious.

    Liked by 1 person

    • California Joe says:

      Ted Cruz is Canadian and not eligible. Rand Paul can’t compromise and walks away from 90% wins because they aren’t 100%. Donald Trump won over 300 electoral votes which worked out to 60% or more so we can afford to be obnoxious from time to time. No?

      Liked by 4 people

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      I disagree, and I state that as one who strongly supported Cruz until he was beaten by President Trump. Moreover, it is abundantly clear that President Trump IS a better POTUS than Ted Cruz would have been, and this for a host of reasons, one of which is that Cruz is nothing like the undefeatable and indefatigable street fighter Trump is. If he were, he would have beaten Trump, not the other way around.

      Liked by 9 people

    • Justin Green says:

      I’m one of the “ardent Trump fans” who voted for Cruz in the primaries and then was livid and stopped listening to Mark Levin during his own TDS days, when he was incapable of criticizing Hillary for more than five seconds before ranting about Trump.

      NeverTrumpers are far more obnoxious than any Trump fans and on par with far left Democrats in terms of obnoxiousness.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Ad rem says:

      Kent….if you want your future comments posted, I suggest you knock off the insults and name-calling. Admin…

      Liked by 1 person

  12. cdnintx says:

    Can’t wait for her BFF Spartacus to announce he is running. Can you imagine Kamala and Booker debating each other?

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Garavaglia says:

    Will Michelle be their “lightbearer”? I think this would give Trump free reign to go after BHO…which I believe makes Trump win again. Many of us are dying for O’s legacy to get ripped apart. Michelle runs..Trump wins..IMO.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Anon says:

    She is the mostly likely to get the nomination, imho. Don’t underestimate the level of racism and sexism on the left. VP might be Booker or a token white male such as Beto.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Anon says:

      She is a black female in 2019. Lack of substance is no barrier to getting nominated on the left. Ocasio-Cortez is proof, and worse, Harris has been “groomed” for this by wealthy liberals for years.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Concerned Virginian says:

      She is NOT eligible to run for President or for Vice President. BOTH of her parents were not born on American soil and most likely were NOT naturalized American citizens before she was born to them. Even if one or both of her parents were naturalized prior to her birth, she still would not be eligible as neither one of the parents was natural born in the United States.
      However, this will not stop Harris from going for it. Once Barack Obama trashed the Constitution by himself running for President and winning, the natural born clause went by the wayside. Barack Obama was himself not eligible to run as his father of record was a British subject at the time his son was born; there seems to be some controversy as to whether his mother (a natural born American citizen) was legally eligible to transmit American citizenship to Barack Obama at the time of his birth.
      If I get this correctly, the Founders understood the concept of natural born to be that the father of the child (children) himself, born on United States soil, was the parent who transmitted citizenship to the child (children). As it was, for practical purposes, impossible for the first few Presidents and Vice Presidents to have one or both parents born on United States soil, they wrote the natural born clause for succeeding generations.
      If there is a CTH family person who is a trained Constitutional lawyer, please weigh in.

      Liked by 2 people

      • I would be VERRRRRY CAREFUL here. Why?
        Because PDJT is still in office and HE HOLDS A LOT OF CARDS THAT ARE JUST WAITING TO BE PLAYED.

        PDJT was hired by us to get the government straightened out. AND THIS MEANS…FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTION ABOUT WHO IS ELECTED AND NATURAL BORN…

        Liked by 1 person

      • amwick says:

        I am 99% certain that neither parent was a citizen in 1964. I don’t know if either ever became citizens.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Just Beachy says:

          She grew up in Canada, correct?

          Like

        • Sentient says:

          A lot of people here seem to think that matters to ones natural born status. I don’t. Minor v Happersett says that a person born in the land with two citizen parents is natural born, but it doesn’t say that only a person born to two citizen parents is natural born. My layman’s understanding of British common law at the time the constitution was adopted was that any free person born within the realm was natural born. Anchor babies, in other words. Thus Harris is natural born. Cruz was not, his twisted argument notwithstanding. Obama may or may not be, since 1) we don’t know where he was born (his birth certificates were both forgeries, but that may have been to hide something else) and 2) congress had adopted laws that restricted the ability of a minor parent (or one who had only recently reached their majority) to confer citizenship upon offspring.

          Like

          • Bruce_Derns_Finger says:

            Anything less than being born in the U.S.A. to two U.S.A. citizen parents is a statutory U.S. citizen. A natural born Citizen is a U.S. citizen by no positive law, but by the act of nature – i.e. born in the U.S.A. to two U.S. citizen parents (repeated).

            Like

          • amwick says:

            So I think that our founders wanted people who were citizens by birth and by parentage. In other words they wanted to protect the nation as much as possible and thus the requirement would be born on our soil and of parents who were citizens. There are lawyers who believe this too. My point is that it is unclear, good people can see it very differently (which is fine) and the issue should have been settled.

            Like

      • Bruce_Derns_Finger says:

        Reference your comment: “She is NOT eligible to run for President or for Vice President. BOTH of her parents were not born on American soil and most likely were NOT naturalized American citizens before she was born to them. Even if one or both of her parents were naturalized prior to her birth, she still would not be eligible as neither one of the parents was natural born in the United States.”

        Although Kamala Harris truly is not a natural born Citizen since both her parents were not U.S. citizens when she was born, Harris would have been a natural born citizen if she would have been born after her parents were naturalized as U.S. citizens. Summary: Parents do not need to be natural born citizens for them to beget natural born citizen offspring, as-long-as the parents are U.S. citizens when their children are born in the United States of America.
        http://puzo1.blogspot.com

        Like

  15. p'odwats says:

    An empty suit with no real accomplishments to her name, and let’s be honest here, she got to where she is today because she was former California Assembly speaker Willie Brown’s mistress. He opened doors for her that she would of never had without his help. Now after two years of nothing as a US Senator she wants to be president. Sorry Senator, but we already have a leader in the White House who does more in a given day than you’ve done your entire life. She is in a powerful position today because she shook her booty to get it. What a field of losers the Democrats are fielding for 2020, and it’s only going to get more hilarious this year as more of these losers announce their runs for the presidency.

    Liked by 2 people

    • starfcker says:

      ” let’s be honest here”. That’s a great post, po’dwats. She’s dumb as a rock. I’m starting to get an idea as to why our president is so confident about 20 20

      Liked by 3 people

      • p'odwats says:

        The only thing that worries me is vote fraud. We all know the Democrats are gonna cheat. It’s those Rust Belt states the president won that has me worried. He won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by very narrow margins, and you can bet the RATS already have their plans in place in those three states plus Florida, Texas, Georgia and North Carolina to steal and alter votes in their favor. I hope sometime this year the president makes vote fraud a topic of discussion.

        I don’t know how we can ensure a fair vote nationwide. I have no doubt there was massive vote fraud in the midterms. I live in California and it took up to two weeks after the election to declare a winner in some of the Republican held House seats in Orange County, all of which the Republicans eventually lost. C’mon folks. At most there were probably 300,000 votes to count, and we’re led to believe it took two weeks in some cases to count them? Yeah, two weeks for the RATS to commit vote fraud, which is what they did. Call me concerned for 2020!

        Liked by 3 people

        • montanamel says:

          WE CAN…..if, we, the CTH folks will go out there and register as a poll watcher for both the primary and the general elections….carry a cell phone and keep your 1911 in the car nearby! Check-6

          Like

          • Yy4u says:

            How does poll watching keep votes from being “found” days after election day? Which is what happened all over the country in the midterms with enough of the “found” votes being for the Democrat to swing the election. THIS is the problem!

            Liked by 1 person

        • NC Patriot says:

          There is already a challenge coming in the next several months in NC, challenging the voter rolls in 1/3 of our Eastern counties. When I looked on our map——-very high new immigrant population there !

          Like

    • budklatsch says:

      De ja vu obama

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sentient says:

      None of those disqualifiers disqualify her from winning the nomination. As you said, it’s a field of losers. Q: Who’s stronger than Harris? A: No one.

      Liked by 1 person

  16. mikebrezzze says:

    Kamala is qualified, she was Willie Brown’s first concubine!

    Liked by 4 people

  17. celebrity squares…..love it.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. AmericaFirst says:

    I keep thinking that any of these contenders from CA *ought* to be pretty easy to beat: If the RNC aired commercials showing CA when it really was the Golden State and contrasting it with what has happened under the last few generations of leftists, pictures of homeless, mile upon mile of homeless encampments, folks urinating, defecating, and copulating publicly, the Berzerkley crazies out there slinging their bicycle chains at speakers or attendees …

    Or maybe just a graph of their bankrupt cities and their pension debt.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Snow White says:

    Another token bumbling idiot with no experience in anything else but sleeping around in order to climb up the career ladder. What could possibly go wrong??? / sarc.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Latina says:

    Is shaping up to be a race to the marxist bottom. Who promises to give more freeshit, including US citizenship for all!!!!!!!!!
    They are staring out with 70% tax “on the rich” well well well, that needs to be challenged! Somebody needs to floats 110% tax on rich. Come on… Gotta spread the wealth around so everyone can have a piece of the pie. The marxist pie where everyone is staving.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Got243kids says:

    Kamala Heresy makes Marxism look tame. A very dangerous woman.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Marygrace Powers says:

    Bet Stacy Abrams will be all in 2020
    as the Chris Christie candidate/my bet.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Latina says:

    Its important to call them marxists, or communists. DO NOT CALL THEM LIBERALS.

    Many immigrants know the meaning of the word LIBERal and it means free individual. LIBERalism is small gov, LIBERtarian. I wonder how many immigrants vote for them thinking they are pro individual liberty because the leftists marxists convinced the sheep to call them liberals.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Latina says:

      Continuing my post:

      “It was FD Roosevelt who called his economic statism “liberal” precisely because it was the opposite of liberal. He was a propagandist, and the Left repeated and spread the lie because it was good propaganda. It took a word which had been used to describe a good, popular freedom based policy and used it to disguise the new bossy restrictive government rules.
      That this propaganda still twists a word into meaning the opposite of its original meaning shows how far the Left has dominated and polluted political discourse.

      Like

      • Latina says:

        A book by William Simon (Nixon’s Secretary of the Treasury) titled “Time for Truth”.
        Mr. Simon stated that, when the Roosevelt socialist/communist regime took over, they knew that the American people would not accept them calling themselves “socialist”. So they redefined liberal to mean “someone who uses the power of government for the good of others”. They did not drop “economic signifiers”. Rather, in the best manner of Orwellians, they redefined liberalism to put a benign face on their socialist totalitarianism.

        Liked by 1 person

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      Great post. 100% accurate.

      “The goal of socialism is communism.”
      – V. Lenin

      Liked by 5 people

  24. Ausonius says:

    The 54-year-old senator has no original thoughts; has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues; has zero substantive accomplishments within her background; and relies upon a wide circle of influence and branding agents to tell her which direction is best to achieve political gains. In short, she is a purposeful/useful idiot within a uniparty wing so structurally Machievellian she will be an easy mark to (be) set-up by the machine.”

    (Correction above)

    MAObama won two elections with a very similar resume’ signifying nothing! How could she lose?

    She could lose, of course, because unlike John McLame, we now have a candidate who will actually attack all of her short-comings and weaknesses!

    Liked by 4 people

    • ForGodandCountry says:

      Obama was a one-off. For one thing, the MSM had not been fully exposed as the mouth-piece of the political left. America won’t be duped like that again.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dekester says:

        It is possible that Black males, and Hispanics will not be tempted to vote for Harris. The Beta W/M and the neurotic suburban W/Fs are the ones to be concerned about.

        God bless PDJT.

        Liked by 5 people

        • Ausonius says:

          Amen! Possibly enough are waking up to see that DEMS in relation are all about the status quo of victimhood, perpetual poverty, and perpetual programs doing little to nothing for the impoverished.

          50+ Years of “The War on Poverty” and TRILLIONS spent! How does America “fight” a 50-year war and spend so much money and lose? The answer: DEMS and DEM bureaucrats with ancillary aid from RINO’s !

          Like

  25. Robert Smith says:

    “I am running for president of the United States,” she said. “And I’m very excited about it.”

    No Doubt!
    Better to run for office with no accomplishments and the promise of things to come. As opposed to a Senatorial term filled with nothing a non-fringe (normal) person cares about and, instead, filled with leftist “achievements”. If even that.

    Liked by 1 person

    • paper doll says:

      At this point politicians have to run for President just to stay relevant and oh there’s all that lovely campaign cash too.

      Like

      • AmericaFirst says:

        Frankly, it seems another perk of just running for office is that you are immune from prosecution for your crimes; it might be seen as “political” if you were charged. You don’t even have to win to receive this benefit.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Robert Smith says:

        Most of them know they don’t have a snowball’s chance, but want that campaign war chest to play with.

        Liked by 1 person

    • piper567 says:

      Robert, I agree with Ausonius, ^^^…her accomplishments actually exceed those of ozero’s. She has been AG of CA…he was nothing bit a community organizer + one term Senator.

      Like

  26. Sentient says:

    Not sure if anybody already posted this, but…

    Liked by 5 people

    • Sentient says:

      Sundance said: “The 54-year-old senator has no original thoughts; has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues; has zero substantive accomplishments within her background; and relies upon a wide circle of influence and branding agents to tell her which direction is best to achieve political gains. ”
      I just don’t see any of that as being a negative in the democrat party. I think Adams is right that she’ll be the nominee.

      Liked by 1 person

    • G3 says:

      Did you hear her announcement on Good Morning America?
      She announced that she is running. The lone response from the female correspondent was an unenthusiastic “yay”.

      Like

  27. labrat says:

    This woman makes my skin crawl. Literally.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. burnett044 says:

    America elected a made -up person in Barry Barrack Obama….every thing about him made up..
    and elected twice…
    let that sink in a moment.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Sentient says:

      ^this

      Liked by 2 people

    • Bert Darrell says:

      The first Obama win (2008) came right after a disastrous economic debacle in which Bush 43 and the GOPe acted as mere spectators. Even an empty suit would have won that one hands down … and it did, didn’t it?

      The second Obama win (2012) resulted from Romney’s wishy washy campaign and a good dose of voting fraud.

      The 2020 campaign will not have a bitter loser like McCain or a Romney-like angry charlatan representing the Republican Party. The dems will be facing a true winner with real guts and a solid track record of success against the background of a prosperous economy.

      I trust PDJT to find an effective way to curtail the Rats’ fraud and bring the masses to the voting booths. I very much doubt that the millions of Americans who got good jobs and/ or were able to get off the welfare rolls in the last two years will choose to stay home in November 2020.

      Liked by 1 person

    • the5thranchhand says:

      …………however, if the truth was known, it was election fraud, when the taupe dope, supposedly ‘won’.

      Like

  29. Latina says:

    I hope no RINO (democrat plant) runs against Trump. If any decides to do that, we must go after him/her just like they go after conservatives.

    Like

  30. Pale rider says:

    THis is what concerns me
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/14/democrats-prefer-socialism-capitalism-gallup-poll/988558002/
    Republicans are polling higher also.
    It’s occasional cortex that is the hollow carcass like Obama. She is evil, dangerous. If she ate her babies I wouldn’t be surprised. She is a hybrid looney.
    As far as I’m concerned trump can stay till whenever I see no alternatives even close. When he leaves God help us.

    Liked by 2 people

  31. Piper77 says:

    This woman is dangerous. She’d be the worst candidate of all time when it comes to immigration and the border. She scares me.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. paulmafinga says:

    “No two people are truly equal, justice is imperfect. President Trump published a detailed plan for office during his primary campaign. Do you have a detailed plan to insure domestic tranquility, and if so, when will you publish it?”

    Like

  33. emet says:

    The pictures the msm are running of her now seem more smiling and friendly, not angry and arrogant. This is a sign that she is the annointed one.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Zorro says:

    I heard on the radio this morning that Harris is running on a slogan touching on “decency” and “justice”. Given how she went downtown on Willie Brown and brought forward a false accuser and generally participated and supported the fraud that was the Kavanaugh hearing, I see neither decency or justice.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. mikebrezzze says:

    Kamala 2020, that’s how many abortions she’s had!

    Like

  36. Zippy says:

    “has spent no time actually thinking about deeper policy issues”

    What member of the increasingly leftist Dim party has? It’s not at all necessary to appeal to their leftist electorate.

    Liked by 4 people

  37. Sentient says:

    Everyone here is giving reasons that they don’t like her. What I’m not hearing is a reason that she won’t win the democrat nomination or who else will win it and why.

    Like

    • amwick says:

      I am hoping that someone challenges her on eligibility. I think they may go with Beto, for being cool. Next is Michelle, based on recognition. Dumb!

      Like

    • Zorro says:

      The left won’t be able to resist the female/color combination. Anything she can do to change sexual orientation or transition will be a bonus. I know Robert Francis O’Dourke has the manufactured Kennedy/Hispanic thing going but it doesn’t “trump” Harris.

      Liked by 1 person

      • steph_gray says:

        Well then Michelle could be anointed even more easily if her widely suspected secret turned out to be true. Why wouldn’t she use it, that is if she decides she wants the crown?

        Like

    • Sedanka says:

      She will be the candidate. The DNC and MSM will go full scorched earth anti-white. Trump will destroy her and them.

      Like

  38. calbear84 says:

    HARRIS / RAWLINGS-BLAKE 2020
    Space to destroy for those entitled to it

    Like

  39. alliwantissometruth says:

    The problem isn’t Harris running, the problem is the American citizens who would vote for her

    The brainwashed, the manipulated, the perpetually stupid, the naive, the ignorant, those are the types that would put someone of no real accomplishments, a racial pimp, a divider, someone who knows nothing about business, economics and how the world truly works, into office

    The type of voter who’s ecstatic that one particular gender won, that one particular skin color won, without ever thinking about what that means to their own economic interests, or that of their family and children

    Absolute nitwits who haven’t the foggiest idea of the leadership capabilities needed to navigate the immense and hostile political landscape, and to work it so it produces favorable results for Americans

    An accomplished businessman bringing back prosperity, real economic growth and true opportunities for all Americans?

    That’s bad because he’s white and conservative

    An idiot of no accomplishments who would obviously destroy economic growth, create bitter division and sink any opportunities for Americans?

    That’s good cause she’s black, or a woman, or follows a certain political ideology

    That’s where the real problem lies

    Liked by 5 people

    • Concerned Virginian says:

      She’s already playing the race card, another lie as she is 1/2 African (NOT African-American, her father was a British subject [Jamaican African most likely] when she was born and may still be) if that. Her mother is Indo-Aryan. NOT being racist here—simply to state that Kamala Harris is a fraud and a liar to boot.
      And for her—supposedly an attorney—to even think she is eligible to run for the Presidency—that shows clearly the worth of her law degree from Hastings.

      Liked by 2 people

    • dawg says:

      You nailed it. The left has been successful in pounding the identity politics into a portion of the electorate.

      Liked by 2 people

    • NJMAGA says:

      Boy did you nail it.

      Liked by 1 person

  40. Carrie says:

    Just when you think the Convington Catholic High School debacle was winding down, Daily Mail now has as its headliner an article about them donning blackface at a basketball game a year ago. We don’t even know what they were intending to dress as- it could be black panthers or something, as apparently they dress up frequently for their games in various outfits. This is just unbelievable. The only upside to all of this is, the UK has some of the strictest libel laws in the land and I seem to recall First Lady Melania Trump got some money from Daily Mail when they wrote some falsehoods about her not so long ago…

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6616793/Kentucky-Catholic-high-school-Lincoln-Memorial-clash-allowed-blackface-pep-rallies.html

    Like

    • Carrie says:

      So sorry I posted this on the wrong thread! My bad! (I knew I didn’t have enough coffee..)

      Liked by 1 person

    • Red-pilled girl says:

      Oh man, that does look bad on it’s face (pun intended) re the Daily Mail pics of Covington black faces at a game- I would bet dollars to donuts the kids are naieve about the sensitivity/ history of that, and are doing the black/white/color out thing that is popular in important sports games today- Looks like their school colors are black and yellow.

      Like

  41. Mark says:

    Beto is the only one I’ve seen so far who could beat trump. Hopefully he doesn’t run.

    Like

  42. Concerned Virginian says:

    KAMALA HARRIS, a total fraud like BO44, can you imagine her with the Nuclear Codes?
    God Help Us.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Justin Green says:

      Like BO44, she will be determined to make sure Iran has nukes. Maybe she can help Hillary get back into the influence-peddling business to help Russia and Iran out.

      Liked by 1 person

      • benifranlkin says:

        For some reason Kamala Harris as Dame Edna and Hillary Clinton as Edna’s sidekick Madge came into my mind….what a team that would be.

        Like

  43. Piper77 says:

    Get ready for the polls showing Kamala leading Trump by 8-10 points.

    Liked by 2 people

  44. Red-pilled girl says:

    Compared to Harris, Tulsi Gabbard- Representative from HI- seems to be one to take fairly seriously, if not now, in future. She might not be extreme enough though, for what seem to be the Dem party’s current tastes.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      Gabbard is paleocons’ favorite democrat. Thus she has zero chance.

      Like

    • Matthew LeBlanc says:

      She is but Deep State would never allow her to be President so 0 chance Tulsi get the nod. They’d break out the superdelegate hack on her like they did with Bernie even with new rule change.

      Like

  45. Justin Green says:

    I simply can’t take Kamala Harris seriously since she refuses to refer to herself as Helen of Troy.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. Annie says:

    First we have ineligible…watch out for someone to post fake paperwork saying her parents became citizens before she was born..!!! then all the nasty legislation she promoted. ,not to mention sleeping with that crafty old sleezebag..Willie B..and for me the big thing is..she is UN LIKEABLE!!!! with cold eyes when she is her true self…In the tv ads..should she run…keep playing those clips of her saying, over and over and over..during the hearings..Just yes or no, just yes or no!!!

    Like

  47. TakeBackOurRepublic says:

    She’s the right color and sex but that tops her qualifications. Even better if she picks the crazed Beto as her running mate. These people are stupid.

    Like

  48. Ospreyzone says:

    It should be fun trying to pick the Democrat’s actual “chosen one” for 2020. Here are my tips:

    First, sort out the white males. I think we’ve seen the last of them as Democrat presidential candidates. It doesn’t matter if Biden is leading everyone. He’s last Sunday’s sports page to the Dem base.

    Next, look for any candidates that attended the Rockwell Leadership Institute. In today’s Democrat party, that’s almost a pre-req for getting the big Marxist donors behind you. – Soros, Steyer, etc…
    When you think all the Democrat candidates are in the mix, look to see if any previously attended a Bilderberg meeting. That should narrow the field considerably and be a good indicator of the anointed one. (Bill Clinton attended when he was AR Governor. Within a year he was POTUS.)

    Lastly, see which candidate Sean Hannity voraciously goes after. Remember his “Stop Hillary Express” in 2008 that helped Obama across the line? Hannity will chase the first “splitter” that looks good, like a dog chasing a stick. Don’t bother with that one, …it will NOT be the Democrat’s choice.

    …Hope this helps. I’m sure there are many other pro-tips out there.

    Liked by 1 person

  49. SW Richmond says:

    Speaking of cognitive incapacity has anybody heard anything from Ruth Bader Ginsburg lately?

    Like

  50. sir napsalot says:

    >>>> She will most certainly do a big embarrassing stupid thing which will eliminate her from the race. <<<<

    I think you waaaay over-estimated the mental capacity of Democrat primary voters.

    Like

    • SMP Belltown says:

      … or the mental capacity of contemporary political advisors and handlers.

      Just sayin’.

      Like

    • steph_gray says:

      My guess is that this prediction is why sundance has Rick Perry already slated as Kamala’s doppelgänger.

      I think he’s saying she will drop early due to unforced error.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s