Oleg’s Story: Yes, The Russians Were Involved in The 2016 Election…

In the past several days a name has resurfaced, only this time with some more attention than in prior reports.  The name is Oleg Deripaska, a Russian billionaire who is likely much more of a central figure than previously explained.

Byron York recently outlined new documents showing the communication between Trump Dossier author Christopher Steele and DOJ official Bruce Ohr.  Within the early 2016 discussions, Chris Steele appeared to be advocating to Bruce Ohr on behalf of Oleg Deripaska who was banned from travel into the U.S. by the State Department.

(Byron York) Emails in 2016 between former British spy Christopher Steele and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr suggest Steele was deeply concerned about the legal status of a Putin-linked Russian oligarch, and at times seemed to be advocating on the oligarch’s behalf, in the same time period Steele worked on collecting the Russia-related allegations against Donald Trump that came to be known as the Trump dossier. The emails show Steele and Ohr were in frequent contact, that they intermingled talk about Steele’s research and the oligarch’s affairs, and that Glenn Simpson, head of the dirt-digging group Fusion GPS that hired Steele to compile the dossier, was also part of the ongoing conversation. (more)

I strongly urge you to read the York article because I’m going to expand on the Deripaska angle from the context of the reader understanding it.

From the emails it appears Steele and Ohr were discussing Deripaska during a period of February to May (ish) of 2016.  This is important context moving forward because this was the period during the presidential primary candidacy of Donald Trump as the GOP nominee was solidified; Trump won.   This is also the period when we know that “contractors” with the FBI were doing unauthorized searches of the NSA and FBI database for opposition research…. this connects to Fusion GPS.

In essence, Christopher Steele was interested in getting Oleg Deripaska a new VISA to enter the U.S.  Steele was very persistent on this endeavor and was soliciting Bruce Ohr for any assistance.  This also sets up a quid-pro-quo probability where the DOJ/FBI agrees to remove travel restrictions on Deripaska in exchange for cooperation on ‘other matters’.

Now we skip ahead a little bit to where Deripaska gained an entry visa, and one of Oleg Deripaska’s lawyers and lobbyists Adam Waldman was representing his interests in the U.S. to politicians and officials.  In May of 2018, John Solomon was contacted by Adam Waldman with a story about how the FBI contacted Deripaska for help in their Trump Russia investigation in September of 2016.

Keep in mind, this is Waldman contacting Solomon with a story.

Waldman told Solomon a story about how his client Oleg Deripaska was approached by the FBI in September of 2016 and asked for help with information about Paul Manafort and by extension Donald Trump.  Within the backstory for the FBI and Deripaska was a prior connection between Robert Mueller and Deripaska in 2009.

Again, as you read the recap, remember this is Waldman contacting Solomon.  Article Link Here – and my summary below:

♦In 2009 the FBI, then headed by Robert Mueller, requested the assistance of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska in an operation to retrieve former FBI officer and CIA resource Robert Levinson who was captured in Iran two years earlier.  The agent assigned to engage Deripaska was Andrew McCabe; the primary FBI need was financing and operational support.  Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out.

♦In September of 2016 Andrew McCabe is now Deputy Director of the FBI, when two FBI agents approached Deripaska in New York – again asking for his help.  This time the FBI request was for Deripaska to outline Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort as a tool of the Kremlin.  Deripaska once hired Manafort as a political adviser and invested money with him in a business venture that went bad. Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money. However, according to the article, despite Deripaska’s disposition toward Manafort he viewed the request as absurd.  He laughed the FBI away, telling them: “You are trying to create something out of nothing.”

This story, as told from the perspective of Adam Waldman -Deripaska’s lawyer/lobbyist- is important because it highlights a connection between Robert Mueller and Oleg Deripaska; a connection Mueller and the DOJ/FBI never revealed on their own.

I wrote about the ramifications of the Solomon Story HERE.  Again, hopefully most will review; because there’s a larger story now visible with the new communication between Christopher Steele and Bruce Ohr.

It is likely that Oleg’s 2016 entry into the U.S. was facilitated as part of a quid-pro-quo; either agreed in advance, or, more likely, planned by the DOJ/FBI for later use in their 2016 Trump operation; as evidenced in the September 2016 FBI request.  Regardless of the planning aspect, billionaire Deripaska is connected to Chris Steele, a source for Chris Steele, and likely even the employer of Chris Steele.

The FBI used Oleg Deripaska (source), and Oleg Deripaska used the FBI (visa).

Here’s where it gets interesting….

In that May article John Solomon reports that Deripaska wanted to testify to congress last year (2017), without any immunity request, but was rebuked. Who blocked his testimony?

In 2017 Oleg Deripaska was represented in the U.S. by Adam Waldman.  Mr. Waldman was also representing Christopher Steele, the author of the Dossier.  Waldman was the liaison Senator Mark Warner (Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman) was using to try and set up a secret meeting with Christopher Steele. {Text Messages}

As you can see from the text messages (more here), the House Intelligence Committee wanted to interview Deripaska.  However, based on their ongoing contact and relationship Deripaska’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, asks Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chair Mark Warner for feedback.

Oleg Deripaska was blocked from testifying to congress.  Now, it was obviously not from the HPSCI (Nunes Committee), but rather by the Senate Intel Committee, via Vice-Chair Senator Mark Warner.  Oh yes, THAT Senator Mark Warner again.

Now, think about this….  Yes, with Oleg Deripaska in the picture there was indeed Russian meddling in the 2016 election; only, it wasn’t the type of meddling currently being sold.  The FBI/DOJ were using Russian Deripaska to frame their Russian conspiracy narrative. It is almost a certainty that Deripaska was one of Chris Steeles sources for the dossier.

Now, put yourself in Deripaska’s shoes and think about what happens AFTER candidate Donald Trump surprisingly wins the election.

All of a sudden Deripaska the asset becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.

It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump vulnerable to blackmail; it’s the conspiracy crew within the DOJ and FBI.  Deripaska now has blackmail material on Comey, McCabe and crew.

After the 2017 (first year) failure of the “insurance policy” it now seems more likely President Trump will outlive the soft coup.  In May 2018, Oleg tells Waldman to call John Solomon and tell him the story from a perspective favorable to Deripaska.

As the story is told, in 2017 Oleg was more than willing to testify to congress… likely laughing the entire time…  but the corrupt participants within congress damned sure couldn’t let Deripaska testify.  Enter corrupt SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner:

Um, we’ve got a problem here Mark…

The Russians (Deripaska) really do have leverage and blackmail… but it ain’t over Trump. Oleg has blackmail on Comey, McCabe and conspiracy crew.  Oleg Deripaska must be kept away from congress and away from exposing the scheme.

Guess who else must be controlled and/or kept away from congress?

Julian Assange.

Assange has evidence the Russians didn’t hack the DNC.

Between Deripaska’s first-hand knowledge of the DOJ/FBI work on both the Dossier and the DOJ/FBI intention for his use as a witness; and Julian Assange’s first-hand knowledge of who actually took the DNC email communication;… well, the entire Russian narrative could explode in their faces.

Control is needed.

You can almost hear the corrupt U.S. intelligence officials calling their U.K. GCHQ partners in Britain and yelling at them to do something, anything, and for the love of God, shut down Assange’s access to the internet STAT…. Yeah, funny that.

Now, who moves into position to control Julian Assange?

Well, well, well…. Lookie here?  Who dat? Apparently the SSCI wants to interview WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, in a closed session.  Signed by none-other than our corrupt-o-crats Richard Burr and Mark Warner.  Yeah, funny that.

Lest anyone need a reminder…. “The most corrupt part of congress is the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). The SSCI is the center of the deepest part of the Deep State swamp. The SSCI never, ever, E.V.E.R… does anything that does not protect and advance the self-interest of the corrupt Washington DC professional political class.”

Now do we see why the SSCI is the center of protecting the entire fraudulent apparatus?

It’s somewhat humorous to look at this fiasco from the perspective of Oleg Deripaska.  He must be having a lot of laughs with his Ruskie friends about these stupid Americans and how the intelligence apparatus of the United States of America is controlled by corrupt politicians trying to save themselves and the corrupt institutions.

The Russians, notorious for sowing discord, are being used as a shield from sunlight upon actions taken by U.S. own intelligence officers: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, James Clapper etc.

There’s a reason why I keep emphasizing the source of the John Solomon story was Adam Waldman.  Think about it from the perspective of the conspiracy group reading how Oleg instructed Waldman to present his story.

With Deripaska telling Solomon how the FBI contacted him; the background of their prior collaborative relationship; and the likelihood of Deripaska giving information to Chris Steele for the dossier; the scheme team really, really, needed to double down on the Russian conspiracy narrative in case Oleg ever did testify to congress.

By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense.  They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc.  And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin.  See how that works?

The soft coup team protects themselves by impugning the motive of Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.

Lastly, Senator Tom Cotton actually asked FBI Director Christopher Wray if Oleg Deripaska was employing Christopher Steele.  Wray said he couldn’t answer.  WATCH:

This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Julian Assange, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, TowerGate, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

703 Responses to Oleg’s Story: Yes, The Russians Were Involved in The 2016 Election…

  1. Steve in Lewes says:

    With all these interactions and various connections between Oleg, Mueller, Manafort makes me wonder whether there’s more to the Mueller rationale for the extreme treatment / midnight raid / solitary confinement / etc he has put Manafort through besides being a flight risk…I wonder if one of the folks Manafort tried to contact was Oleg ?

    Liked by 6 people

  2. Maquis says:

    Russia sowing discord and chaos?
    Who’d’a thunk it!
    🙃

    Liked by 2 people

    • yy4u says:

      In truth, Maquis, the Russians were just doing what we do in everyone else’s elections; the discord and chaos is being sown and spread by the majority media in and effort to achieve what the Obama IC failed to do — defeat Donald J. Trump.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Maquis says:

        Yes, we meddle, as River Tam would say. But the Communist Conspiracy wrought by the Russians a century ago has long dominated American society, in every sphere, and while we have some bullshit regime change antics in our ledger, nothing in history tops the Red’s utter reversal of America’s perception of Righteousness and Reality.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Binkser1 says:

        The Russians could only dream of being able to create the chaos and discord that our corrupt media and government officials have sown.

        Liked by 11 people

        • Jenny R. says:

          This is an area where the Russians far outclass us — the amount of misery, suffering, and death causes by the Russian communists is far in advance of anything our country has done.
          A good example of their meddling is convincing Americans that our “Deep State/CIA/blah blah blah” are the purveyors of all evil in the world…literally “American is the Great Satan”.
          That’s a bit of communist propaganda right there — it was first bandied about by fellow travelling academics.
          PS. when considering the Soviet Union one must consider the elevated status of Russians within that system, so that’s why I say Russian communists: sure, they’ve had some who were not, but the one group who benefitted most within the USSR were the Russians, in particular the Muscovites — they just kinda took over from the czars, didn’t change a thing about how the ordinary people or countryside was treated (which was like schiesse although if anything more corrupt and more vicious).

          Like

        • Covadonga says:

          The Russians did dream that dream ever since the Communists came to power in 1917, and now they have realized it.

          All of those media people went to “journalism” schools where the professors were overwhelmingly Marxists.

          All those government officials went to places like Harvard and Yale, where the professors in the departments of government (and most other departments) were overwhelmingly Marxists.

          Some of those professors, media people, and government officials, way too many, are not merely Marxists in their philosophical beliefs, but actual agents of the Russian Communist state.

          It has been that way not just this year or during the last Administration, but increasingly since November 16, 1933, when Franklin Roosevelt broke with the tradition of 4 previous presidents and offered diplomatic recognition to the USSR, a regime dedicated to the destruction of our government and of all Western civilization. To some extent, it has been that way since even before 1933.

          They have since infiltrated their agents into every institution of our society: government, political parties, universities, schools, churches, Hollywood, etc. And each agent has attracted a swarm of Useful Idiots, following the Communist ideology religiously, unwilling to put any fact or argument before it.

          And now their followers have achieved the dominance here that they display today.

          Like

    • Let's roll says:

      Mark Warner should be censured. And any Assange testimony must be in an open public setting.

      Time to start rolling out Indictments.

      Mr. Huber, you there?

      Liked by 4 people

      • farrier105 says:

        I don’t think Huber has impaneled a Grand Jury. The link to Sessions’ letter describing his charge to Huber is below. This is NOT a prosecution, but a review and evaluation of past cases. There has been no indication of a change.

        https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4426668-AG-Letter-Re-IG-and-Huber-Reviews.html

        The main paragraph from the Sessions letter:

        “I receive regular updates from Mr. Huber and upon the conclusion of his review, will receive his recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a special counsel,” Sessions stated.

        Like

  3. Great read and yes WE understand the plots and subplots, but the American people do not. This needs to be simplified. “The Obama IC spied on DJT to help HRC in the 2016 elections”. There are 2 months to tell this story and the MSM will not report it. But they will have to report arrests, charges, and plea deals. Get those going and then fill in the narrative pushing stories to Foxnews, Wash Examiner, The Hill.

    Liked by 20 people

    • gda says:

      Logic, based on the recent signs, portents, and developments tell me that indictments, arrests, charges and plea deals are imminent.

      But I have been disappointed before, so lets see what happens.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista says:

      Shorter version of Senate Select committee on Intelligence?
      Simply SS.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Basil says:

      I completely agree. If indictments and arrests aren’t commenced immediately after Labor Day, they aren’t going to happen at all this year. This needs to move faster or it isn’t going to happen at all.

      The GOP are awful, the worst, except for the Democrats, who are human cancer.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yes. And a large % of the GOP are willfully undermining POTUS45. If they dont have indictments, arrests, and plea deals before the mid terms I will have to throw in the towel. We seem to get teased with stuff that never materializes. If there really is a John Huber there is no reason we cant have one indictment in a year. JUST ONE! Rudy gives me hope. He would be great counsel to POTUS on who,how, and when. And his seems cock sure something is going down soon. But if nothing happens before midterms it could mean the swamp won and POTUS is on his own.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Maquis says:

          Especially if the impatients abandon the fight.

          Liked by 4 people

        • CopperTop says:

          The Deep State thinks they are patriots. They always will and won’t ever acknowledge what they did was wrong. You just have to review Strozk’s level of huff and puff over the notion that Congress questioned his patriotism when he got involved in the insurance plan.

          Liked by 2 people

          • DanO64 says:

            “They” still think they are righteous and the real heroes of the republic. This gang of seditious slugs needs maximum punishment.

            Liked by 2 people

          • GB Bari says:

            They’re only concerned about protecting the Deep State and its financiers. This is about Power, not patriotism.

            And you can go to the bank on that (just make sure it’s a small, locally owned community bank).

            Liked by 2 people

      • Trump Train says:

        Exactly. Time is running out. There will be no red wave because there won’t be enough to counter punch the democrats cheating. Trump is a huge risk taker, most of the time it has paid off for him, sometimes not but like several I know like him, they cut the loss and move on to the next. HE is cutting it awful close here.

        Like

    • Convert says:

      This. Please. God. Amen

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Reverend Right says:

    Natalia Veselnitskaya’s infamous meeting with Don Jr. was bracketed by meetings with Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS:

    “Also on or around June 9, prior to and following the Trump Tower meeting, Veselnitskaya met with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn R. Simpson,”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Veselnitskaya

    She was only able to be in the country because of “extraordinary” steps taken by the Obama Administration to allow her in without a visa.

    “The Homeland Security Department confirmed Friday that Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was granted special entry to the United States on multiple occasions in 2015 and 2016 at the request of the Justice Department.
    ….
    A federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan told the court in a hearing in January 2016 that the “extraordinary circumstances” parole request needed to be approved by Attorney General Loretta Lynch.”

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/342118-homeland-security-confirms-special-entry-for-russian-lawyer

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Cuppa Covfefe says:

    JFK didn’t change the immigration law; Teddy dunk-em and LBJ did. JFK was already dead in 1965, the year of the Hart-Celler Act, which did the dirty deed. And blaming Israel for the multi-kulti movement is a bridge too far, even for IWB, which is Anti-Semitic, at best.
    Soros is no Jew, perhaps a JINO, but of the synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2:9ff and 3:9ff.).

    Finally, George Soros has FOUR sons, and a daughter (patron of planned (un)Parenthood), all of whom fund, direct, or aid the multitude of “open society” foundations and groups which are really meant to foment violence and result in a closed, globalist society.

    The Soroses (Gyorgi Schwartz and his progeny) are a pox on this Earth. Send them all to Siberia, to pound rocks for Putin…

    Liked by 1 person

    • annieoakley says:

      Thank you for saying this. I read extensively about Soros years ago and keep reminding people the whole family is evil. George has a brother Paul living here too.

      Like

  6. missilemom says:

    My immediate concern is the censorship going on many platforms to stifle the revelations Sundance and others have made. Byron York was chastised by Twitter for his reporting on dossier. Does TCTH have a backup plan for posting? Starting to look like we all need one.

    Liked by 11 people

  7. daughnworks247 says:

    Smack my head, NOW we understand why ALL of DC did not want Trump and Putin talking privately. I get it now.

    Liked by 13 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Great point. The Black Hats have no idea what Trump might have learned. And if what Putin told Trump is PROVABLE from our side, then yeah – DEEP FRIED TRAITORS.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Unknownsailor says:

        They HAVE to know that Trump knows EVERYthing thanks to White Hat people in the IC. NSA records and saves everything.

        f anything, any information from Putin could be used by Trump to leverage known but not able to be used information into the light, and into actionable intel.

        Liked by 4 people

        • G. Combs says:

          Do you really think Putin and Oleg had the really nasty stuff recorded??? Why do you think they tried to place Cohen in Prague? It is Face to Face where the real dirt surfaces.

          Liked by 2 people

    • DanO64 says:

      MAGA has the smartest women.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Charlotte says:

      I read somewhere on a friendly site that Trump and Putin apparently had a meeting on Air Force One that wasn’t reported on…

      Like

  8. In case you are like me and need different ways to absorb all of this chaos…here it is verbally from Bongino’s EXCELLENT show from yesterday. Who is “our guy”?

    https://omny.fm/shows/the-dan-bongino-show/ep-781-who-is-our-guy

    I need all the help I can get. I need words, pictures, diagrams, videos, audio, timelines, hand signals…and a good ol’ fashioned slap up side the head just to get an inkling of all that has happened and is still happening.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista says:

      Excellant podcast as all of his have been since episode 628.
      In fact his lingo sounds an awful lot like Sundances.
      Hmmm.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Firefly says:

        Bongino s lingo is from the articles he cites – often the same ones as Sundance cites. The comments each make and word choices have a different style. Soloman, unlike a Bongino and Sundance is beating the pavement and talking and getting documents directly. Then Bongino and Sundance read such reports and connect various dots and different perspectives. Like Sundance, Bongino cites where he gets his information (and often cites the Conservative Treehouse). A lot of comments on the treehouse are similar to other blog- not due to plagerism but just similar thinking and words coming into play- like splodey heads, white hats, black hats. The left has noticed we conservatives have our quirky terminology that caught on that’s different from their lingo.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Grassleygirl/Breitbartista says:

          Thanks for the tutorials!!
          I didn’t mean to suggest anything suggestive.
          Different styles indeed. I would suggest that Bongino has some different contacts than Soloman,Carter and various other journalists. Namely the IC and LE communities.
          He was sec Service for Obama and Bush. Also ran a campaign in swampland Maryland. Almost pulled it off,too. (Ahem, was ahead until some “lost ballots” were miraculously found, all demo of course)
          Dan does H/T all of his sources, except when confidential. He is a “Queens” guy like our VSGPDJT, so has a unique understanding of him IMHO.

          Like

      • Turranos says:

        Imagine that!

        Like

  9. billrla says:

    A huge, stinking pile of WTF.

    Liked by 6 people

  10. Paul Killinger says:

    I noted in Mr York’s article that Bruce Ohr received a call from Asst Dpty Secy of State Katleen Kavelec in the days prior to the election updating him about campaign contributions by Trump supporters.

    Mr York then states Ms Kavelec is presently the Trump Admin’s candidate to be Ambassador to Albania. Based on her involvement with Mr Ohr, it would seem more apropos to deport her there!

    Liked by 6 people

    • Gary says:

      Think of it as Polite Exile

      Liked by 1 person

    • formerdem says:

      Albania is a beautiful and pro-American country, and the only group of people who really really love both Bush and Clinton. People were kind to me there; taxi drivers were nice when i got dollars and euros mixed up the wrong way (cost to them). They have beautiful beaches and they love us.

      Like

      • Annie says:

        absolutely right.. I have 2 Albanian friends..husband and wife..American citizens..he was the major of one of their cities..and she is a chemical engineer..daughter is a nurse.lovely people….

        Liked by 1 person

  11. Paul Killinger says:

    SD – Very well organized complex reporting, sir. Thank you!

    Liked by 4 people

  12. Deplore Able says:

    I am trying to discern Oleg’s motivations. Oleg is a billionaire. He has a lot to lose. Getting involved in an attempt to take down a candidate for President of the United States is risky business.

    What motivated Oleg?

    1. The USA had tied Oleg to organized crime in Russia and that restricted his ability to get a visa and certainly also made his international business endeavors more difficult.
    2. Helping Hillary came with a price. Assuming Hillary knew about Oleg’s help in providing Steele with information, then Hillary would owe Oleg a favor or two after the election. If Hillary didn’t know, then Oleg’s knowledge of the scheme could be used to blackmail Hillary. Hillary could be forced toprovide the same favors, or else Wikileaks gets dirt on Hillary, DNC, Comey, Lynch, etc.
    3. Having the dirt on Hillary would also please Vladimir. What would Vladimir require of Hillary in return for silence? Perhaps USA recognition of annexation of Crimea?
    4. Vladimir would also love how this scandal disrupts the USA, sows distrust in American institutions, etc. What a dream come true for Vlad!

    I wonder if Oleg considered the possibility that Hillary would lose? I wonder if he considered the possibility that Hillary’s people would be so careless as to leave evidence of the scheme and his involvement in texts, e-mails and notes? I wonder if he has read the chapter in Trump’s book about revenge? What is a Russian Oligarch to do?

    When it became clear the Trump was likely to survive the coup, Oleg knew it was time to switch sides. So in May 2018, Oleg has his lawyer contact John Solomon and place a news article informing Americans what a swell guy he was in trying to get our spy released from an Iranian jail. He even spent $25 million of his own money in the attempt. He is an Oligarch with a heart. The story also reports Oleg laughing when the FBI suggested that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia. Planting a story like that would make PDJT happy.

    But Oleg has more work to do to make amends for his transgressions. Step one is to stay alive. Step two is to testify to Congress and bring the Mueller witch hunt to an end.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Concerned says:

      Oligarch with a heart?!

      Like

      • Deplore Able says:

        That is what Oleg wants us to think. He spent $25 Million of his own money trying to spring our spy Levinson from an Iranian jail. That is a pretty big chunk of cash, even for an Oligarch.

        Liked by 1 person

        • wolfmoon1776 says:

          Something VERY weird about that.

          Liked by 1 person

        • CNN_sucks says:

          25 mil is a chump change. U1 yield was 1 billion dollars.

          Like

        • Lanna says:

          He’s worth $7 billion. About 100 oligarchs control more than $420 billion.

          He and another oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg ($16 billion) we’re aluminum producers, merged their companies (along with another partner, Glencore, a Marc Rich company — Rich was pardoned by Clinton) before they had a falling out. Global financial crisis hit and they were bailed out by a Putin bank.

          Both wanted out. Deripaska made a bid on German car company Opel — GM wanted to split it off, a Canadian auto parts company called MAGNA was involved, but Opel was supposed to go to Russia and jump start their lagging auto manufacturing biz. Merkel was in favor, Russians and Canadians on board, Hillary as SOS overrode the recommendations of the Auto Task Force and many of her State subordinates and nixed the $8 billion deal, which everyone else was in favor of and was financed by the Kremlin and the German government.

          MAGNA paid the Clinton Foundation between $500,000 and $1 million (likely a pass through from Putin/Deripaska). The Clintons were also being paid by Veksekberg who opposed the deal and wanted to destroy Deripaska. He paid the Clintons to pull the rug out from under Deripaska. Millions of Russian funds from Rusnano, the Russian government venture capital company, wound up in the Clinton Foundation. Those funds had been allocated to the Skolvoko Innovation Center project, Putin’s attempt to form a Russian Silicon Valley, and part of the “reset” promoted by Hillary, which was controlled by Vekselberg.

          (Interesting aside — Skolvoko never produced much in the way of tech innovations, and Russian government funding dried up due to serious drop in ppb of oil, so now they’re looking for private investors.)

          In 2010, as part of the “reset”, State sent a couple dozen private tech company reps to Skolvoko to collaborate. This was around the same time the NY Russian spy ring was caught and sent packing, including sexy spy Anna Chapman who was running a honey pot op and got too close to a sitting member of Obozo’s cabinet (some say it was Turbo Timmy Geithner, some say Hillary.)

          Also, Russia is using Rusnano as an intelligence platform, acquiring tech and developing relationships within Silicon Valley, acquiring board seats, getting inside info and nudging companies in a direction favorable to Russia. Remember that John Podesta joined the board of Joule, a high tech renewable energy company right after the Uranium One sale, and a couple of months later Rusnano invested $35 million, earning a board seat for Rusnano’s corrupt CEO.

          Sorry for the Russian novel length of this post, but there’s a lot of back story to what’s going on now, many players and hard-to-follow threads and connections.

          Liked by 1 person

          • zimbalistjunior says:

            wow…bravo lanna.
            btw magna’s founder frank stronach has/had daughter belinda.

            belinda and our boy bill clinton were rumored to be lovers back in the day.

            im sure there are a trillion more connections here…very incestous little demi monde.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Blue Moon says:

              And Magna plant located in our city—huge place that employes 1000 or more people from all over southern kentucky. Must be doing good cause they are expanding their business.

              Liked by 1 person

          • Turranos says:

            Great post, thank you so much for filling us in on the backstory.

            Liked by 1 person

          • G. Combs says:

            Very Interesting Lanna,

            So Oleg Deripaska would have no reason to ‘LOVE Hillary’ and Vekselberg could very likely be one of the birdies chirping in GPS Fusion’s ear.

            We sometimes forget about the infighting within a country.

            Like

  13. chrystalia99 says:

    As always, excellent summation of a thickening plot– you couldn’t sell this as fiction, even for a soap opera…..

    Liked by 3 people

  14. drocity says:

    At the end of the interview, Farkas said, “we have good intelligence on … if they found out how we knew what we knew about their [the] Trump… the Trump staff dealing with Russians — that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

    Second (8th?) look at this statement….

    Liked by 1 person

    • Concerned says:

      CIA, It would be a shame to see Farkas introduced to water boarding.

      Like

      • Deplorable_Infidel says:

        “to see Farkas introduced to water boarding.”

        I think she talks just fine without being waterboarded. Doing that to her would slow her down. We know how she talks in front of one MSLSD host (Mika B.)

        How about we just put in her in a room surrounded by a bunch of holograms of CNN/MSNBC folks and see how chatty she can get when she is surrounded by sycophants?

        Like

    • SR says:

      By now PTrump knows everything.

      Liked by 1 person

  15. Chris Gould says:

    Great investigative journalism as always.
    You need to simplify for the average reader.
    Perhaps start the article with bullet points summery. I think simpler “sound bites” will spread the word more widely. You are filling the void left by the collapse of the New York Times. Very important work to be done.

    Like

    • G. Combs says:

      “…You need to simplify for the average reader…..”

      That is for the rest of us Treepers to do as we take ‘soundbites’ out into the cold cruel world.

      Sundance gives us the PhD level info. Also Dan Bongino does a good job for those he prefer audio to reading.

      Like

  16. I won't back down says:

    Just a guess/wish that Oleg gets to testify at the Manafort trial? That’d be awesome and (to use my kids term) EPIC!

    Like

  17. redline says:

    I wonder just how much the restoration of Deripaska’s US travel privileges might have been worth, to Deripaska, to HRC, to the Ohrs, to Steele, to the Foundation, to the Podestas, and to the DNC and their media goon squad?

    It’s not hard at all to see many, many millions in cash, and tens or hundreds of billions in favors, access, and legal and trade arrangements, ALL riding on HRC’s taking over the White House.

    Like

  18. andyocoregon says:

    So when can we expect to see indictments for Hillary and all her cronies, especially those in the FBI?

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Putin wanted Hillary to win. HRC, Bill, Podestas, Clinton Foundation were bought and paid for years ago. The fact that Pompeo, Coats, Wray, and Mike Rogers wont admit it is disappointing. Worse yet, they continue to push the false narrative that Putin was rooting for Trump to win. If that false narrative had been disavowed then this whole investigation would have collapsed. The emphasis would have switched from Trump To Hillary. The fact that Pompeo, Coats, Wray, and Mike Rogers still carry this bull shit narrative created by Comey, Brennan, and Clapper is neauseating. And yes, I know Mike Rogers gave it “moderate confidence”. WTF??? None of these folks can re-asses their earlier assessments????

    Like

  20. Let me guess, that ungrateful bitch Omarossa will have her book out in October and do the Michael Wolfe tour on every f@cking show for a month. And she will finally get accepted by all the dbags that had been dogging her for year.

    Like

  21. citizen817 says:

    JW on Bruce Ohr role

    Liked by 1 person

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Something very wrong here.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Elle says:

      and don’t forget the second half of that sentence: ” Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out.”

      That second sentence seems to hold the great big, huge, giant key that unlocks the door to the secret passageway. To know where that passageway takes you, you’d need to know the backstory. Nevertheless, the back-room money laundering outline is clearly visible within those words. Since the Obama administration never let’s a crisis go to waste, my guess is that this was just another pretense to give millions in cash to the Iranians and friends, only they didn’t even bother to get the asset back. So who really put up that 25 million and who really was stiffed?? Clearly, not the Iranians.

      Like

  22. JoD says:

    Yesterday, Skelator Bill Nelson, said that the “Russians” have already “meddled” and hacked data in the upcoming Florida November elections. All day long, the Supervisors of Elections for Florida Counties, have been going on the record to dispute his claims. Governor Rick Scott has said that either Nelson is lying or he is withholding critical info. Uh oh.

    Like

  23. Fools Gold says:

    Thank You Sundance. Great work and perspective as usual! More pieces of the aweful puzzle to ponder.

    I’ve always tried to view things from 30,000 ft. level while ignoring all the chaff/flare. IMHO there’s a lot of smoke coming up out of conspiracy offices in Washington DC right now. I would refer to it as a smoke screen designed to cause a lot of chaos and nervousness amongst the conspirators that causes a couple of mistakes to be made and leading to the justice torch being ignited. When that happens, I hope to hear the theme song from the series cops being played before each arrest is made. It will be a glorious sight to behold making the term MAGA obsolete. We patriots must have patience and stand behind DJT and his supporters and never give up or give in. Our country and constitution depends on it.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. scott467 says:

    “In essence, Christopher Steele was interested in getting Oleg Deripaska a new VISA to enter the U.S. Steele was very persistent on this endeavor and was soliciting Bruce Ohr for any assistance.”

    ___________________

    Why?

    What is it about Deripaska’s physical presence inside the United States that is so important, that he couldn’t do remotely, by phone or by courier or by computer or by teleconference?

    Unless Deripaska is his own hitman and knee-cap buster (maybe when he was younger, but doubtful at this point in his career as an ‘oligarch’), what is it that he can do ‘in person’ which he cannot do or coordinate from afar?

    The seemingly most obvious answer is to be able to ‘communicate’ in person, without being listened to by NSA and/or military intelligence.

    And if a Russian oligarch is involved in something so secret that he needs to travel to the other side of the planet to speak with someone face to face in order to avoid even the possibility of being overheard by international intelligence agencies, then it must be something exceptionally important, exceptionally criminal, or BOTH.

    Considering the context and the timing, the vitally important and exceptionally criminal activity Oleg was a key part of was the conspiracy to make sure Sick Hillary stole the election.

    Liked by 5 people

    • CopperTop says:

      Don’t forget the former Ukraine ambassador (theirs) said that Kerry said not to worry about Trump…and the country planned accordingly…OD was a useful puppet for Clinton. I’m sure to Ukraine it looked like HRC was going to protect the aluminum industry he ran (important to them)

      They paid the price…Trump would not speak to them when everyone else was getting a chance to.

      Liked by 2 people

    • keithinmissouri says:

      Excellent point I have not previously been made aware of.

      Like

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      A nuclear conspiracy to manipulate the United States would be of that level.

      Liked by 1 person

    • zimbalistjunior says:

      could also be: accessing a safe deposit box, petitioning for citizenship or refugee status/escaping from putin, catching a baseball game in person.

      nowadays i dont think oleg could be confident that any conversation hed have, even face to face in a ‘safe’ locale, would not be monitored…alexa is everywhere

      who knows

      Like

    • Joshua says:

      Scott, this is a question itching the inside of my head as well. I am so behind on reading I may not catch up.

      We heard he has been losing money hand over fist and I guess a lot recently (did not verify myself) …?

      I have run through a gamut of possibilities but in no way think I can approach it without reading more.

      Communication? Overseas ? Encryption ? Satellite ? … the proverbial Ham ? Naw this can’t be it. Lobbying ? Naw.

      Yeah we know it would help him communicate with the FBI or ‘whoever’ …. but how does that help him. I mean unless there is a large reward to him for giving info in a back alley – but he owns what ? 100’s millions ?

      U bring up personal hand on shoulder talk… this question is what inspires me to comment despite adding nothing but I can’t imagine he couldn’t send a younger more effective version of himself who could whisper his name and effect the same.

      Access to material? A combo/key he doesn’t want to share ? This begs credulity in this age in my decrepit world view.

      — raw dump —

      Can someone shout how long he was here, is he still here, how long his visa was for (yes, dumb question I know). What airport did he fly into?

      I have constantly wondered through this mess where Steele was located when he Contacts. The last series of texts told a lot (cause they talk about air travel etc, and “we”)… I have trouble processing all the msgs when I don’t know physically their separation (country of msg origin etc.). How many times has Steele been in the US in the last 4 years ? How many times per year?

      Escape is the only other thing I can imagine atm And that’s just cause it hasn’t been mentioned not cause there is support. I do hope someone is able to answer this.

      I honestly haven’t not read or thought of a possible weight bearing explanation. But I am falling behind and may not be able to keep up. Due diligence would require multiple full time positions and we rely so much on Sundance …

      I am gathering from my antennae that “reporters” nowadays work 9-5 not accounting for makeup prep.

      This CAN be answered by non-swamp people … I think… (89.7% sure – mostly cause it must be money/business oriented).

      Like

  25. CopperTop says:

    What was it that Ellis said during Mfort trial?

    Oligarchs are just how that country does business.

    Agreed. I get tired of the media portrayal that when the FBI uses and Oligarch it’s for the greater good when a business consults with one it’s getting ‘mobbed’ up.The narrative needs to be the same. I don’t care which one…

    If it’s mobbed up…than the FBI is getting mobbed up

    If it’s business then the FBI is doing business and therefore so is anyone else who engages with them.

    Liked by 3 people

  26. scott467 says:

    “The agent assigned to engage Deripaska was Andrew McCabe; the primary FBI need was financing and operational support. Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out.”

    ______________________

    What, there was no American billionaire or multi-millionaire who could afford to spend $25 million?

    The FIB just had to utilize the services and cash of a Russian oligarch? And what was the quid pro quo for THAT?

    The FIB isn’t just a rogue, renegade agency; it’s an enemy inside the camp.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Zimbalistjunior says:

    Rudy and sekulow subbing for hannity on radio today. Couldn’t listen for more than an hour. They seem to be taking victory lap already.

    A bit unseemly.

    Like

    • CopperTop says:

      Because DJT probably has said…he’s not going to talk to Mueller. Until they are 100% sure of the POTUS intention …they are in agony. I think the exuberance is he’s going to let them let Mueller try to bring this to SCOTUS…

      That’s what these two went to law school for…every first year’s dream is to be before the Court in a Constitutional separation of powers debate.

      Like

      • DanO64 says:

        You mean like Rod Rosenstein recently did? President Trump even had his lawyer send him a pair of cufflinks for the special occasion.

        Like

    • smartyjones1 says:

      They are doing everyone a public service. They are letting the public know the hoax is being undone and decisive evidence in hand will be coming to the fore.

      When an observer remarked how comfortable and relaxed Rudy Giuliani appeared with Hannity, I take that as a very good sign. Rudy was a great mayor in New York City. If he’s exhibiting pure confidence on behalf of President Trump, it’s all good.

      Let the bad guys go to sleep worrying at night what is going to come before the public next. Many of us have been waiting for these final stages to lance that boil of a Russia Collusion Hoax.

      Liked by 1 person

  28. scott467 says:

    “The Russians (Deripaska) really do have leverage and blackmail… but it ain’t over Trump. Oleg has blackmail on Comey, McCabe and conspiracy crew. ”

    __________________

    Then by extension, Deripaska ALSO necessarily has leverage and blackmail — right now, currently — over Hussein and Clinton.

    And by extension, over whomever pulls Hussein’s and Clinton’s strings.

    Oleg better be paying his security detail extremely well.

    Like

    • scott467 says:

      Or, it may be that Oleg IS one of the people pulling Hussein’s and Clinton’s strings all along.

      Maybe Oleg is part of the international treason cabal that owns ALL of the leading politicians of the Western world.

      We know about Soros and Rothschild, but there must be lots of names we don’t know. It could easily be that Deripaska is one of them.

      Like

  29. scott467 says:

    “They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?”

    ____________________

    Except the scheme-team’s ploy doesn’t work if Deripaska has EVIDENCE, in which case the scheme-team is just making sure they all hang.

    And if Deripaska does NOT have evidence to prove his allegations, then it was never going to be anything besides ‘he said / she said’ hearsay anyway, in which case the scheme-team could play that angle instead of doubling down on Muh Russia.

    And the thing the scheme-team always knows, which is ever present in their minds, is that the NSA has it ALL — all of the hard evidence to expose and convict the scheme-team and everyone associated with them.

    And the NSA reports to the president.

    And the president is Donald J. Trump.

    Checkmate.

    Like

  30. CopperTop says:

    Anyone else clearing their evening for reading comments here on the next post on whatever is about to drop in about an hour (close of business in DC)?

    Liked by 2 people

    • scott467 says:

      Your post prompted me to check Q… several new posts today.

      …………………………………………
      Q !A6yxsPKia. No.129 📁
      Aug 10 2018 11:00:09 (EST)

      Does POTUS make statements that are false?
      Knowing what you know now…..
      [Start @ 12:00]

      Think Haiti [14:40]
      Think Watergate Commission [removed_why_investigate].
      Listen very carefully.
      TRUTH.
      Surrounded by EVIL.
      NEVER STOP PRAYING.
      WWG1WGA!!!!!!
      Q

      Part of the next Q post is an image which I can copy here, but this is the text:

      Re_read drops re: Haiti.
      At some point it will not be safe for them to walk down the street.
      PURE EVIL.
      HOW MANY IN WASHINGTON AND THOSE AROUND THE WORLD (IN POWER) WORSHIP THE DEVIL?
      Conspiracy?
      Fake News?
      The World is WATCHING.
      Q
      …………………………………………

      Posts can be read here —> https://qanon.app/

      Liked by 1 person

  31. scott467 says:

    “Lastly, Senator Tom Cotton actually asked FBI Director Christopher Wray if Oleg Deripaska was employing Christopher Steele. Wray said he couldn’t answer.”

    _________________

    He should have asked if Oleg Deripaska is employing the FBI.

    Wray wouldn’t be able to answer that one, either.

    Like

  32. Dr.Jay says:

    LOL. It appears that Nellie Ohr, (co)writer & researcher of the ‘Steele’ dossier, is a hardcore Marxist and a Stalin apologist (just like Putin by the way, who is perhaps a bit more nationalistic, but otherwise also a Stalin apologist).
    You really can’t make this shit up!

    https://spectator.org/nellie-ohr-woman-in-the-middle/
    Special Report: Nellie Ohr: Woman in the Middle
    Is it a surprise to find a Stalin apologist at the center of the Steele dossier scandal?



    Still, relevant facts have emerged. These include Nellie Ohr’s study in the USSR in 1989; her fluency in Russian and Ph.D. in Russian history in 1990; a 2010 CIA affiliation, which practically makes her former MI6 agent Steele’s “opposite number”; and the extremely curious detail, harkening back to earlier eras of spycraft, that on May 23, 2016, around the time she came on board Fusion GPS, Nellie Ohr applied for a ham radio operator’s license.

    Thus, Nellie Ohr’s exact activities inside one of the great Russian-American disinformation campaigns of all time remain opaque. What most observers don’t realize, though, is that we already have a window onto her thinking through her strongly-etched, ideological view of Soviet history.

    This is in contrast to what we know of Steele, aside from his widely reported anti-Trump animus. We may read that Steele was widely known as a “confirmed socialist” while president of the Cambridge Union debating society in 1986; we may see, thirty blank years later, that he chose to break the sensational outlines of his relationship with the FBI and role in its investigation of the Trump campaign in Mother Jones, a media outlet named for a famous American socialist; but Nellie Ohr has a paper trail.

    This paper trail is comprised of a Stanford Ph.D. thesis and a series of academic book reviews, all published between 1990 and 2004 when Nellie Ohr, Harvard Class of 1983, was probably between the ages of 29 and 43. I mention her seasoned age because in the course of my own detailed analysis of Ohr and her writings here, here and here, I discovered something shocking that cannot be put down to or dismissed today as youthful inexperience: Nellie Ohr follows in the academic tradition of 1970s and 1980s “revisionism.”

    Like me, most readers unencumbered by a Ph.D. will not immediately understand the term’s profound significance. Here is a beam of illumination from one of the movement’s progenitors, Sheila Fitzpatrick, who, in a 2007 overview of this “revisionist” school, explains its origins thus: “Quite a few of the 1970s revisionists were Marxists… who hoped to find that at least part of the promise of socialist revolution had been realized or could be recovered.” She further notes that the “political agenda” of the so-called New Left “undoubtedly influenced many American revisionists.”

    In the introduction to her 418-page paper, Ohr sets forth her main arguments, citing many of “revisionism’s” leading figures — J. Arch Getty, Roberta Manning, Gabor Rittersporn, Sheila Fitzpatrick.

    Speaking “revisionist” lingo, Nellie Ohr turns the millions killed by Stalin into “excesses,” which, in Ohr’s words, “sometimes represented desperate measures taken by a government that had little real control over the country.” (Poor Stalin.) She depicts purges as representing “to some degree a center-periphery conflict in which the ‘state-building’ central government tried to bring headstrong local satraps under control.”

    In later years, Ohr reviewed several books by “revisionists,” further underscoring her simpatico perspective. Even in the dry code of academic writing, some of her statements ring out. Here’s one from a review of Robert W. Thurston’s Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia (1939-1941), a book controversial (notorious) for its Terror-lite thesis.

    One must commend this attempt to account for the agonizing paradoxes of the Stalinist state, one which was building a legal structure, yet tortured and executed innocent civilians, and which offered opportunities to poor people while denying them political representation.

    Oh, those agonizing paradoxes. Awful enough inside ivy-covered walls teaching young people, but something else again at the heart of what is still unfolding as a government-wide-conspiracy.

    Ohr’s recommendations put her own arguments “into perspective,” too. At one time, the New York Times defined the range of historical debate on Stalin’s “collectivization” as stretching between Robert Conquest and Chris Ward. Conquest, renowned for his works on the purges and the terror-famine in the Ukraine, is also famous as a judgmental anti-Communist, and gloriously so. Ward, an emeritus senior lecturer at Cambridge, it seems, is non-judgmental to a point of understanding Stalin’s crimes. Walter Laqueur pointed out that the subtitle to the conclusion of Ward’s book is: “Tout comprendre c’est tout pardonner’ “ — to understand all is to forgive all. Ward has also been noted for his “contagious enthusiasm” for the writings of Trotsky.

    Nellie Ohr reviewed Ward’s book in the mid-1990s while she was still teaching Russian history at Vassar. This may account for the following allusion to the classroom, where — who knows? — perhaps her future Fusion GPS colleague Edward Baumgartner was taking notes.

    Ohr writes:

    To introduce students to the Stalin era can be a frustrating task. To convey the terror and excitement of the period, one can assign a memoir of a prison camp victim or an observer such as John Scott or Maurice Hindus.

    Terror and excitement?

    Not incidentally, Maurice Hindus was an epic Soviet apologist. As for John Scott, Whittaker Chambers i.d.’d him in Witness as belonging to the cabal inside Time magazine that tried to get the ex-Communist witness fired; much later (to be fair, probably after Ohr wrote her review) Scott was revealed to have infiltrated the OSS for the NKVD (codename ”Ivanov”).

    Ohr continues:

    Such accounts, however, fail to explain the excesses of the Stalin era, and whether, in Alec Nove’s words, Stalin was necessary…

    “Excesses” again. And, really now: Was Stalin necessary? Perhaps this question was a topic of “frustrating” debate in Ohr’s “revisionist” classroom.

    Today, however, none of this is academic. We now know there is a central figure in the “dossier” spying scandal who finds “agonizing paradoxes,” and “terror and excitement” in Stalin’s dictatorship, where, after all, “excesses” sometimes happen.

    What’s really alarming is I’m sure Vladimir Putin does, too.

    This is not a quip. In Putin’s version of “thaw,” it is mass-murdering Stalin who has re-acquired a kind of respectability and even reverence that is not incompatible with aspects of academic “revisionism.” I don’t take lightly the possibility that the anti-Trump conspirators have more in common with the old Kremlin than currently imagined — especially when we consider that Donald Trump, whether he or anyone else realizes it, is the most instinctively anti-communist president elected in generations.

    YOU REALLY CAN’T MAKE THIS SHIT UP!

    Ergo; Nellie Ohr is a hardcore totalitarian Marxist, yes even a Stalinist.
    And she is one of the main researchers, composers and writers of that ‘Steele’ dossier made by Fusion GPS.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. jmclever says:

    My guess is Oleg Deripaska keeps documents on everyone and everything. His lawyer would do the same. Deripaska is taking a hit from the sanctions and would love to be out from under them. He instructs his lawyer to release certain.documents to conservative journalists because sending directly to Nunes would do more political harm than good. Especially if corrupt Senate Intel committee has anything to say about it.

    Why did Deripaska get involved? Was it all for a US visa? Was it because he has something against DJT? An ax to grind with Manafort? Is this the real reason that Manafort is getting the shaft from Robert Mueller, because he can out the “conflict of interest” Mueller has in being connected to Deripaska

    Did Deripaska double cross Hillary/DNC and set the whole thing (insurance policy) to blow up in their faces at the release of documents on his command? Is that the blackmail he holds over the Corrupt Obama administration?

    Liked by 1 person

  34. CopperTop says:

    ICYMI

    Liked by 2 people

  35. scott467 says:

    “Guess who else must be controlled and/or kept away from congress?

    Julian Assange.

    Assange has evidence the Russians didn’t hack the DNC.”

    ________________

    And that evidence is absolutely, certainly, without any doubt, secured by a dead-man’s switch.

    So they can’t kill him, and they can’t let him testify (openly). All they can do is keep him where he is, off the playing field.

    And they will do so for as long as they can… but they can’t keep him off the playing field forever.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Newhere says:

    Deripaska also has ties to McCain, apparently in same web as Gates/Manafort. All were linked to McCain from his first presidential campaign onward. I remain baffled that this never comes up w/r/t Manafort prosecution, because the time period at issue corresponds not with Manafort’s links to Trump, but with McCain (Gates reportedly was McCain’s campaign manager in 2000 and 2008 — sorta relevant detail, you’d think, but never mentioned in any of the “star witness” coverage).

    There are details in wiki-lks DNC database, easily searchable (opp research). don’t want to link there, but this article sketches same facts: https://www.circa.com/story/2017/06/21/heres-the-russia-influence-controversy-that-john-mccain-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about

    Liked by 2 people

    • zimbalistjunior says:

      former watergate rat-f-er donald segretti worked on mccain campaign for pres once too. part of west coast usc mafia…curiously, donald attended school near stefan halper at same time…

      one nice cabal working behind the scenes for 50 plus years…succeeding at their shenanigans more often than not…

      Liked by 1 person

  37. Curt says:

    Trump’s election set in motion the exposure of the Deep State and, in the process, the huge nest of vipers therein. No matter how this eventually works out, it will NOT bode well for the Socialists and their supporters. Every claim they make against Trump seems to, not only go nowhere, but upon close examination the Deep State accusers are committing crimes worse than the crimes they “accuse” Trump of committing. Mueller, Rosenstein, et al, are truly a bunch of scary criminals…..

    Like

  38. Donna in Oregon says:

    Oleg is suing Manafort using Mueller’s indictment….

    Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska used details from Mueller’s indictment in a new lawsuit against Paul Manafort and Rick Gates

    https://www.businessinsider.com/oleg-deripaska-sues-paul-manafort-rick-gates-using-mueller-indictment-2018-1

    and this lawsuit by Oleg is because of this:

    The story of toxic Russian money — government money handled by crooked officials and the profits they make from it — is, however, all about connecting the dots. For example, one of the companies the U.S. court was told Mikerin used to receive kickbacks, the now-defunct U.K.-based Leila Global Limited, was part of a network of firms ostensibly controlled by Latvians Erik Vanagels and Stan Gorin. The company that owned Black Sea Cable — the only Ukrainian asset political consultant Paul Manafort attempted to buy as part of an investment project with Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska — belonged to the same network, as did the firm to which ownership reverted after the Manafort deal apparently fell through.

    Russian Money Talks. America Was All Ears.
    A rekindled nuclear scandal shows how Russia exports corruption to the West.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-10-18/russian-money-talks-america-was-all-ears

    and then there is this about Oleg, Podesta’s and Mercury:

    Robert Mueller Targeted Two Lobbying Firms. One Is Thriving in Trump’s D.C.
    There are second acts in influence-peddling, provided you know the right people.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/robert-mueller-targeted-two-lobbying-firms-one-is-thriving-in-trumps-dc

    August 2, 2018, Mueller tosses Podesta to NY Prosecutors here:

    The U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan is investigating whether three prominent Washington power players engaged in illegal foreign lobbying, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office referred the matter to federal prosecutors, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.

    Those under investigation include Tony Podesta, a Democratic lobbyist and co-founder of the onetime lobbying powerhouse the Podesta Group; Vin Weber, a former GOP congressman from Minnesota; and attorney Greg Craig, who worked in the Clinton White House and served as White House counsel for the Obama administration.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/02/feds-probing-tony-podesta-obama-lawyer-ex-rep-on-foreign-lobbying-after-mueller-referral.html

    Like

  39. Donna in Oregon says:

    13 reasons why the Russia probes must be expanded
    https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2017/05/03/13-reasons-why-the-russia-probes-must-be-expanded/

    6. Podesta Group lobbied for same pro-Kremlin Ukrainians as Manafort. The Podesta Group, founded by John and Tony and headed by Tony, took $900,000 in payments from what Politico calls “pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians who also employed former Donald Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.” The purpose was to conduct influence operations against Congress and federal agencies on behalf of the pro-Putin figures. The Trump campaign’s liaison to the RNC in 2016, Rick Gates, connected the Podesta Group with the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, a non-profit whose board originally contained Ukrainian members of parliament from the pro-Russian party.” The lobbying ended in 2014 when Ukraine’s pro-Putin president, Viktor Yanukovych, fled to Moscow.

    7. Uranium One: Sale of 20% of US Uranium Production to Russia. Uranium One was owned by Frank Giustra, a close friend and business partner of former President Bill Clinton. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the company’s sale to the Russian nuclear agency, Rosatom, giving Putin’s nuclear weapons monopoly ownership of 20% of US annual uranium production. Sberbank, which hired lobbyist Tony Podesta, was the lead financial institution involved in the transaction. Tony Podesta’s firm also represented Uranium One before the State Department in 2012 and 2015. Giustra and others tied to the sale donated $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

    8. David and Simon Reuben. Two British billionaires who made a fortune with Russian gangster-oligarchs during the latters’ so-called “Aluminum Wars,” the Reubens have long been tied to organized crime figures. They formed a joint venture with gangster-tycoon Oleg Deripaska (with whom they later had a falling out) and Lev and Mikhail Chernoi, who are linked to the Russian Mafia. The Reubens raised money for the Clinton Foundation.

    9. Viktor Pinchuk is a pro-Kremlin Ukrainian oligarch with a decade-long relationship with the Clintons. He gave to both the Clinton and Trump campaigns. He has long sought to be accepted as a broker between the U.S. and Putin. His company, Interpipe, provides gas and oil pipelines to Iran. He is reported to be the largest funder of the Clinton Foundation.

    Like

  40. Janie M. says:

    A wild thought which just occurred to me. When President Trump had the 2 hr. private meeting with Putin…is there a possibility Putin delivered a message from Deripaska (to PT) regarding what had transpired between himself and all the U.S. government agencies (DOJ, FBI and members of Congress) who wanted him to collude with them in their attempts to first thwart Candidate Trump and then overthrown President Trump after he was elected.

    Like

  41. This is all very tiresome and frustrating. Trump should declassify everything and release it to the public. We deserve to know how the people have been manipulated and decieved, let the chips fall, the alternative is the slow decent into chaos and disintegration of the best system, on paper, ever concieved.

    Liked by 1 person

    • scott467 says:

      It certainly appears that everything is being timed for maximum impact in the weeks (or week) before the midterm elections.

      Like

  42. farrier105 says:

    Looks like McCabe and Comey put a Clinton loyalist in charge of FBI Little Rock, Arkansas just in time to jam up the Clinton Foundation investigation as it probed money laundering. This is the one real investigation going on, and McCabe plugged this gap nicely for now.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/53KBH-bRNhw/

    Like

  43. TMonroe says:

    Warner again…

    Like

  44. TMonroe says:

    As far as the catch-22, the White hats just need to be clear. As affirmed by Barry, RR, and others. no evidence of tampering of actual votes (nor any clear path as to how that could’ve happened) occurred. (And of course, the remedy to even the idea of any such problem occurring is verifiable voting methods — paper ballots, voter ID, etc.)

    HOWEVER, could an oligarch corrupt individuals within government? Well, if they were insulated from oversight (e.g. those in intelligence who could answer any inquiry with a matter being too sensitive to reveal or as part of an active investigation — never mind that such investigations can be started by those with an agenda to hide from oversight), sure. Don’t forget as our host has mentioned time and again the ways the DOJ kept itself from oversight, specifically the National Security Division (with deputy AG Sally Yates issuing her lengthy memo essentially exempting the NSD from congressional oversight).

    Thus, the canard of Russian tipping the scales as far as the voting process remains far-fetched and evidence-starved. However, every bit of oligarch pay for play with partisan US/UK bureaucrats that gets uncovered is its own issue.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s