Righteous – Louie Gohmert Tells FBI Agent Peter Strzok He’s a Liar – “Did You Use That Smirk When You Lied To Your Wife”…

Wolverine Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) had a fiery exchange with FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok during today’s joint hearing with the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees.

Mr. Gohmert dispatched all the nonsense, looked weasel Strzok straight in the eyes and called him a lying liar who lies.   Epic in the scale of brutal honesty….  Louie Gohmert was plumb-mad-dog angry; and within his direct assertion of everything everyone knows to be true: did you use that smirk when you lied to your wife”?  Gohmert sent the Democrats into fits of spontaneous combustion.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Jeff Sessions, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Spygate, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

352 Responses to Righteous – Louie Gohmert Tells FBI Agent Peter Strzok He’s a Liar – “Did You Use That Smirk When You Lied To Your Wife”…

  1. kinthenorthwest says:

    Strzok lost all credibility with his affair and then trying to say he has always been truthful.

    Liked by 21 people

    • Newt Love says:

      Having an affair used to be grounds for losing your clearance(s).
      Why?
      Because if a person can blithely betray their sworn oaths of allegiance of love and fidelity to the spouse and the parent of their children, how easy would it be for them to betray their oath of fidelity to “… uphold the US Constitution, and defend against all enemies, both foreign and domestic” ?
      Nowadays, it is ignored, mostly after the Slick Willy era.

      “Security” also changed the question from “have you ever taken a controlled substance…” to “In the last 5 years, while on duty, have you used a controlled substance…”
      I asked my polygrapher, “Does that mean we are allowed to use controlled substances in our off-duty time and keep our clearance?” His answer was “Yes.”

      Golly, the Leftists have had an impact!

      Liked by 14 people

      • spaceranger says:

        It also presumably used to be grounds for loss of clearance because back in those days when people still had some sense of shame, having an affair could set one up for blackmail and allow them to be compromised.

        Liked by 5 people

        • Ris Eruwaedhiel says:

          It was also seen as a serious moral flaw.

          Liked by 5 people

          • Scarlet says:

            It IS a serious moral flaw ! And it shows selfishness and a severe lack of empathy.

            Liked by 4 people

            • SSI01 says:

              I can remember conducting investigations into homosexual behavior when I first entered my former agency. We even had an assigned case category for it. The homosexual behavior was considered a serious moral flaw that could cause the participant to become susceptible to blackmail if they possessed a security clearance.

              That sort of infraction is not investigated any more.

              Liked by 2 people

      • Cathy M. says:

        And having an affair could also subject him to Blackmail.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Attorney Man says:

        It has become a joke.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Enoughisenough says:

        I remember reading long ago that when former FBI Director Louie Freeh heard that an agent was having an affair, he would make that agent confess to their spouse so they wouldn’t be subject to blackmail.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Diane says:

      I can’t be the only one to note that Strzok is gay, right? The story behind all this goes deeper…..and probably into the oval office.

      Liked by 1 person

    • John says:

      With his affair,Strzok was a securiy riskSpy agencies know how to use compromised people.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Leane Kamari says:

    Now another Dem complaining about children, GOD have merci and throw some brain on these democrats

    Liked by 10 people

    • Leane Kamari says:

      Raskin, from whatever state he is where actually people voted for this s…, in my humble opinion, what where they thinking?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Leane Kamari says:

        Just canceled a newspaper as they chose to pick a certain ex-minister to pay him for opinion pieces.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Patriot1783 says:

        Dem from Maryland- there is your answer.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Leane Kamari says:

          Actually I envy you Americans because of your “checks and balances” as we do not have that in Germany, although it is not working even in the US as it is plain to see, it does showcases the biases and truthfulness of each political person in senate and congress and that possibility of that to be seen in public on TV is more than remote in Germany.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Patriot1783 says:

            One of the Repubs actually adminished Strzok for saying deomocracy. He pointed out the US was a republic and the ability to vote and electoral College actually keeps the checks and balances.

            Liked by 10 people

          • Vince says:

            This current issue makes completely transparent the brilliance of our founders devising a system of checks and balances so that one branch, if it is corrupt, can’t destroy the country and system of government.

            But the current times also make it obvious where this is failing.

            One, the huge bureaucracy that has grown up in the last century has no real checks and balances on it, and because it is what way, it is where the real power lies in Washington.

            Two, the founders did not take into account that once people got to Washington, D. C. they would feel more attachment to others in government than the people back home they are supposed to represent.

            We need to fix both of those issues during the Trump administration.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Carrie2 says:

              Vince, they are our employees but we did not think they would wind up being our bosses. We need to take back the reigns, set retirement ages, remove lifetime benefits, and a max of 2 terms and no more. Better yet what I like would be a bill a new member of the House would want ALL Congress members live in their own state/city/district and in today’s electronic world do business via real time video for any business. This would be great: #1 would be paid what the state citizens decide, #2 we could have our eyes on them, #3 we would have access to their computers (as they would be bought by us for them) and copies of the videos, and no more disallowing voters access to their rallies/meetings as they are our employee and do not have that authority. So, you can see what this bill never came to fruition because Congress members think they own us and we must inform them those days have come and gone and so will they! By doing this, we would save huge amounts of money, control that they will not be bought and sold to outsider donor dollars, etc. Time we let them know where they are our workers and we have had it with their thinking they can do what they want and ignore us. No more!

              Liked by 1 person

              • Vince says:

                These agencies need to be dispersed into the country, not collected into one governing city for the ruling class. Put the FBI in Omaha, Nebraska and a different type of person will be attracted to work there, one who values police work, and not a chance to be part of a ruling class.

                Like

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      Liked by 10 people

      • G. Combs says:

        Nothing like a brain dead Progressive denying all evidence presented… Or more likely a PAID Correct the Record Bot.

        Liked by 7 people

      • Jim Smith says:

        I wish that this was true. It’s not. Asylum can only be applied for from within the US.
        Refugee status is applied for outside the US.

        https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum

        Like

      • Carrie2 says:

        kinthenorthwest, makes perfectly clear what must be done and I have also been saying this – their approach to asylum is submitted BEFORE getting to a border and yet they think they come with a piece a paper and the pearly gate opens. Two things have to be the cause and nothing else viable. Democrats, of course, don’t want legal approaches at all. We now know that DiBlaslio illegally left the US and illegally entered Mexico. Haven’t heard if the Mexicans hauled him off to jail but sure hope so.

        Like

        • kinthenorthwest says:

          Majority are only seeking asylum due to money. The Illegals have been told and know that they can get free food, housing, education, and money without even working..

          Like

  3. This was awesome! Way to go Louie!

    Liked by 11 people

  4. donna kovacevic says:

    Off Topic here but I thought perhaps some would like to hear what is happening outside the circus today. Just heard on our news that we had a threat of vehicle ramming in Toronto Ontario and police are out in full force in the downtown area where the CN Tower is also Rogers Center where they are expecting 60,000 people at an event tonight. I pray to God nothing happens but with that incident a few months ago where a vehicle slammed into pedestrians on a busy downtown street is scary. Trudope of course is not concerned with these happenings in the last while he loves his refugees. Diversity is our strength!! BS. Please pray for us.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. Heika says:

    Strozk is a LIAR

    Liked by 6 people

    • JX says:

      An arrogant, condescending, conceited, unrepentant liar.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Cathy M. says:

        And extremely unprofessional. The first things concerning testifying in court that a federal Special Agents learns are:
        Don’t Lie
        Don’t be goaded by the defense attorney & lose your temper
        Don’t argue with the attorney
        Fully answer only the questions asked (i.e. no tirades)
        Don’t talk over the attorney who’s asking the questions

        Not abiding by those standards more likely than not would jeopardize your case.

        Strozk was/is an epic fail.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Newt Love says:

      > “Strozk is a LIAR”

      Strzok is a multiple personality LIAR disorder.

      Like

  6. itswoot says:

    “…looked weasel Strzok straight in the eyes and called him a lying liar who lies.”
    – SD

    Apparently, Strzok is a Jedi Master of weaselness. The farce be within him.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. NJ Transplant says:

    Thank you Louie. Bonnie Watson-Coleman – the gentle “lady” from NJ has a lot of nerve saying Judge Gomert went off his meds. Before she went into Congress, one of her last F You’s to the residents of NJ was a new law that businesses are not allowed to ask criminal history of job applicants. The companies can get a big fine if they ask criminal history. They can only ask it at the point of offering someone a job. I imagine if they don’t give them the job there will be another fine. Bonnie W-C pushed through this law because both of her sons are criminals. I have more stories than this about her. What a piece of work.

    Liked by 8 people

  8. RyderLee says:

    Loving This , sundance ! Thank You for Sharing this with us All 💗

    Liked by 5 people

  9. rumpole2 says:

    Concerned Citizen: “Strzok’s not ever going to get away with no indictment, right? Right?!”

    Q-Anon: “No. No he won’t. We have Sessions (and Huber), and 50K sealed indictments”

    #Patience GrassHopper
    #45D Chess

    Liked by 5 people

  10. Oldskool says:

    Of course we all know nothing is going to happen to Strzok or any of the rest of them because who is going to prosecute it and where? That’s why Rep Gohmert is such a jewel, he “double tapped” that SOB with some Texas justice.

    Liked by 9 people

  11. Tesla Coiled says:

    I have only watched the hearing since watching this op clip.
    I am STUNNED! All of the dims are more disgusting that stroke!
    Swamp doesn’t need draining, it needs a MOAB!

    Liked by 3 people

  12. MIKE says:

    Kudos to Louie Louie for “whiskey throttling” smarmy strzok

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Marian says:

    Time to shut the Federal Bureau of Insurgency down. I’m sure there are decent agents. Still if Strzok, Comey, and Mueller are any indication of what rises to the top; time to just pull the plug. Quite frankly the budget Dept of Rod Rosenstein can be cut by 7/8’s while they are at it. Too bad we don’t have a worthy GOP. Anyway, Strzok is a frighteningly, demonic little man. Hope the wife is suing for a divorce.

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Mr. Morris says:

    So how much money did the Democrats get for allowing the sale of U.S. Uranium assets to the Russians during the Obama Administration? We know the Clinton Foundation got millions from the sale of U.S. assets. Was information concerning Uranium 1 on the sexual predator Anthony Weiner’s computer? Why did Peter Strzok fail to investigate info on the Weiner laptop and other devices? What information was he and FBI and DOJ biggies protecting?
    Does Peter Strzok’s behavior and texts with Lisa Page indicate an unbiased person? Does his burying of info on Weiner’s laptop indicate a grand coverup?

    Liked by 4 people

  15. Cool theater but no consequences.

    Like

  16. Holy cow!!! More popcorn, this is getting interesting!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  17. phattcat says:

    A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

    Gohmert: You said earlier in this hearing you were concerned about a hostile foreign power affecting the election. Do you recall the former Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough having an investigation into an anomaly found on Hillary Clinton’s emails?

    Let me refresh your memory. The Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough sent his investigator Frank Rucker along with an IGIC attorney Janette McMillan to brief you and Dean Chapelle and two other FBI personnel who I won’t name at this time, about an anomaly they had found on Hillary Clinton’s emails that were going to the private unauthorized server that you were supposed to be investigating?

    Strzok: I remember meeting Mr. Rucker on either one or two occasions. I do not recall the specific content or discussions.

    Gohmert: Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney, that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list. It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?

    Strozk: Sir, I don’t.

    Gohmert: He went on the explain it. And you didn’t say anything, you thanked him, you shook his hand. The problem is it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia and from what you’ve said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton. So the forensic examination was done by the ICIG — and they can document that — but you were given that information and you did nothing with it. And one of the things I found most egregious with Mr. Horowitz’s testimony, and — by the way Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call.

    http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

    Liked by 3 people

  18. MaineCoon says:

    Gohmert broke Strzok.

    From this point on everything change. Other congressmen spoke more forceful truth, but Gohmert is a strong Christian and nows God’s truth and God reveals lies to him also. Gohmert spoke Truth in righteous indignation. Thank you Mr. Gohmert.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Landslide says:

      Agree. I heard him speak at the Tx. Repub. Convention and he said, “We need prayer. If you have ever prayed, now is the time to do it.” He was very serious, almost somber, when he said that.
      You got it, Mr. Gohmert.! We are praying.🙏🏼

      Liked by 4 people

  19. Louie is a person who I know.
    I’m in Delta County Texas
    Big in Republican Party local and state.

    Congressman Gomert knows the Texas way!

    Liked by 5 people

  20. Chuck Re-todd…… today is a big win for the president

    Like

  21. nanny210 says:

    That “STARE DOWN” THAT Louie was doing the whole time the demwits heads were exploding, with the weasel, WAS A SITE TO BEHOLD!! His head never moved, eyes never moved, stared dead straight to Struck Stroke (as Rush calls him!)!!! It was priceless!! The cherry on top of the whooping he laid on the weasel!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  22. magatrump says:

    Strzok is a POS liar. He is a traitor to this country. He needs to be indicted and jailed.
    Evil evil bastard.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. NCPatrick says:

    Yayyyy Louie!! Evidently they had all agreed not to reference the relationship between Strzok and Page as all of the earlier testimonies referred to her as … er … “your associate” until Louie Gohmert called a spade a spade. Strzok, the so-called “man of extreme honor”, is not the least bit honorable and we’re all sick of looking the other way. Bring it on!!

    The hearings today were literally revolting. Dims did quite a job of clinging together, but Lord they sounded stupid. I wasn’t actually watching but had it on in the background, and amazing how predictable the questions were from those lib states.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Texian says:

    Rep. Gohmert is a classic. I like him because he is a classic original southern conservative democrat in the traditional sense of what the party used to be like.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. PotP says:

    Goodlatte needs to drop the hammer on the noise sources disrupting the hearings.

    One warning. Then summary trebuchet.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. cadgbd says:

    There is a “narcissistic smirk” sometimes called the “sociopath smile” if you do a search there are many interesting hits. Here’s just one for example:

    Liked by 1 person

  27. cadgbd says:

    Sorry, I meant to paste this link instead of the one above:

    Like

  28. Leane Kamari says:

    It seems incredible, the lady from Texas seems to me such a no-brainer…….I am speechless

    Like

  29. The Radar Guy says:

    I no longer think anyone will face conventional justice (i.e., the inside of a prison cell) for their crimes. Still, today has to be a watershed moment. The conniving Strzok thinks he’s too clever by half. Yet, he has been exposed for the lying liar that he is. I have to believe that the only thing many Americans will find more revolting that his performance will be the awful behavior of democrats.

    So unconventional justice may have to do – this event lighting a match to the mid terms and gaining Senate seats that will put PDJT in the driver’s seat. Let’s face it, he can’t fire Sessions or Rosenstein right now because of too little support from Senate Republicans. Let him gain four or five seats and the entire equation changes.

    In the meantime reputations of the conspirators head towards the gutter – a deserved outcome.

    But it would be cruelly ironic if the ONLY person seeing the inside of jail cell is poor old Paul Manafort… But with 55 or more Senate seats, clemency is almost surely in his future…..

    Liked by 1 person

    • Leane Kamari says:

      Pls do not feel sorry for a tax evader like Manafort, he deserved what is coming to him, it is unrelated to Trump and only of his own making at least since 2005!

      Like

      • JX says:

        IIRC he has not been charged with non-payment of tax, but with failing to file paperwork.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Paul Manafort is in solitary confinement and he hasn’t been convicted of a crime. There is no justice in that, no matter what you think of the man. It shows that Mueller is a cruel monster lacking in all human decency, who will use every dirty trick to take down our Very Stable Genius. Mueller and crew will never see the inside of any cell. Equal justice????
        Anarchy is coming if Sessions doesn’t get out of his bed and do what’s right here.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jeff says:

        Okay, wait a minute. The man’s in solitary confinement, 23 hours a day in a little cell, before his trial, for what – tax evasion?
        That doesn’t seem excessive to you?

        Like

  30. Newt Love says:

    If I could have asked the “special” Agent Strzok Peter questions, I would have asked:

    “As the ‘number 2’ of FBI Counter Intelligence at the time, are you proud of your part, and the overall FBI and DoJ part in, for the first time in history, using the FISA Court to secure the necessary Title 1 indictment of an innocent US Citizen, Carter Page, that you framed as a Russian Spy, so that you and the FBI CI, and the DoJ could harness the power of the CIA and NSA to capture all communications by one party’s candidate, but not the other party?”

    [Strzok tells his filibuster lies]

    “Agent Strzok, are you proud of being part and parcel of the first FBI and DoJ that continued to surveil the duly elected President, both during the transition, and even after the inauguration?”

    [Strzok lies some more]

    “Do you understand why these manifest actions and results might be a problem for Americans who see this, and tie it directly to you, and to the other FBI and DoJ leadership that made this happen?”

    [Agent Strzok filibusters an answer.]

    “Thank you for lying to me directly. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.”

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Archie says:

    Well, I’m glad this circus is pleasing to the masses. /sarc
    Now wander of to Fox News and Limbaugh like good little lemmings.

    Like

  32. Tree Knot says:

    Watching Strzok during the hearing with his head on a forward angle, looking with his eyes to the top of the eye sockets and his facial expressions told me all I needed to know about him.

    Liked by 4 people

  33. Carterzest says:

    Haven’t heard a peep from either of the lovebirds 💕 spouses. Funny, No?
    Almost like maybe they were not having an affair and this story is just cover, huh?

    Liked by 2 people

  34. Ris Eruwaedhiel says:

    I was listening on the radio and loudly clapped and cheered when Louis Gohmert said that. Ha ha!

    Where was Mrs. Strzok? Why didn’t she attend the hearing with her husband? I’m sure that he could use some moral support .

    She could do some ‘splainin’ about how she got the job as associate director SEC Enforcement Division on October 14, 2016. A payoff to Strzok? As long as they stay married, she can’t be forced to testify against him.

    Liked by 4 people

  35. 5warveteran says:

    Strzok is a snarky lying bastard.

    Liked by 2 people

  36. Jenny R. says:

    I said a while back that Strozk and Page were not living in any reality but their own — they were the type to actually believe they were some great, noble people, blah blah blah because they habitually told it to themselves and others told them the same.
    I take that back with one qualification: I don’t think, after witnessing Strozk, that they needed (or at least he didn’t) anyone else to help their fantasy along; they were quite capable on their own.
    This guy is a psycho — look at his expressions (my God, he nearly unhinges his jaws in some of those shots). The man was/is a potential ax murderer. He probably gets off on people being upset by what he did. He needs to be put away where he can’t hurt other people, and our agencies need to be cleansed of such people. How many more of these nutjobs do the Democrats have in their employ (aside from the resistance loons)?

    Liked by 3 people

  37. Swedishmeatball says:

    When Peter gets back to work in the Human Resources Dept., he’s going to be furious when he finds out his days of testifying are PTO days!

    Like

  38. woohoowee says:

    They grow ’em tough in Texas 🙂 Go, Louie!

    Like

  39. free2313 says:

    I cannot believe that the “FBI” has the overall, last say on what, who, when and how a person could answer a question or how it could be answered, especially when in essence the top tier of the FBI are basically under investigation… Cut to the damn Chase…
    These inquires prove over and over again to be a wimp part of the power triad of the government powder. They treat the Congressman as if, they have not power to question their conduct and corruption and they easily slip through their hands.. Un-fking believable.

    Like

    • Instructor says:

      I love it when someone is under oath and tells congress to stick it where the sun doesn’t shine. I hope everyone that comes before congress pukes on them and makes a ass and a joke out of them, they have that coming. Until they get a spine they get no respect. They deserve to be treated like dirt bags, after all they created the FBI so now deal with it. I’m loving it, let the shoe continue.

      Like

  40. wj2016 says:

    Supporting Gohmert’s line of questioning is kind of stupid and off the point. Playing the Moral Majority card makes us looks foolish, un-serious and to be frank – hypocritical. Our own president whom I think is the best President of my lifetime, has had his own issues with women but then again I didn’t vote for a pope in 2016. I voted for the best leader. I don’t want to let this worm Strok to change the focus from his despicable bias against the president to the condemnations of his personal life.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Patriot1783 says:

      His line of questioning was pointing out what a liar strzok was and is and someone like that doesn’t change.
      A sociopath.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I agree, Patriot1783. Donald Trump has never presented himself as an infallible choir boy. On the other hand, Strzok began the hearing with a self-righteous statement that he has never lied – ever. Sure. Okay. Given all his less than forthcoming responses today I’m surprised his nose didn’t spontaneously start growing before our eyes.

        I’m usually one for decorum but I think Rep. Gohmert saw through Strzok’s boy scout charade and wanted him to know that we aren’t buying it. The more Gohmert told him off, the more Strzok grinned like a psychopath. I believe it was the obnoxious grinning that spurred the comment about lying to his wife about the affair. A guilty pleasure, I know, but I enjoyed every minute of it.

        Like

  41. Instructor says:

    Louie got a good hit on Peter but as I watched all the plays unfolding, Peter and the mighty FBI came back hard and just kicked congressional ass. When Peter was advised not to answer a question, he would simply smile and say kiss my ass I’m not answering that question. He showed the republicans how to be tough, I love it. You showed them Peter, you’re the man.

    Like

    • Sunflower Lady says:

      Peter isn’t ‘the man’. He’s a liar. An arrogant liar.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Jenny R. says:

      Yeah, he’s the man all right. The man who could have been Jack Nicholson’s understudy for “The Shining”.
      What is it with Democrats and the “we’re going to need a young priest and an old priest…and a hundred gallons of holy water for this one” look anyway?

      Like

      • Instructor says:

        Kind of hurts that we don’t have a hard core player on our side that will look at his boss in the eye like Peter and Rosenstein do , and tell them go to hell I am not telling you s,it. Yea that takes a pair. Republicans don’t have that brass. Only , I don’t give a dam democrats have that kind of spine.

        Like

  42. trialbytruth says:

    Gohmert ended with well that will come out.

    Come out it will.

    Liked by 2 people

  43. CNN_sucks says:

    Go Gohmert. Storkz is such a smelly low life.

    Like

  44. Lemmy says:

    Nothing screams “please tune me up with a Louisville Slugger” like Strzok’s dirty smirk.

    Like

  45. David Parmenter says:

    Congressman Gohmert,

    Thank you for holding Strzok accountable for his actions. You are right to get in his face and stand up to this pompous a _ _. You showed that Strzok is guilty of all he is charged with. He is guilty of being biased against President Trump and biased for Hillary Clinton. Worse, he is just as much a liar to Congress as he is to his wife and family. He is a disgrace to all.

    You sir are a true statesmen and a throwback to more moral Congressmen.

    Thank you for representing we the people.

    Like

  46. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Patriot1783 says:

    Louis entire line of questioning initially was revolving sbout the unknown algorithm that was found in all but 4 of the 30000+ Hillary Clinton emails. It was determined that it was a foreign entity involvement but not Russia. When strzok denied knowing anything about it despite being the lead investigator that’s when Louis called him
    out as the liar. Oh and all heck broke loose 😂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s