HERE IT IS – Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ Conduct During Clinton Investigation – Full 568 page pdf

The 18-month Inspector General review of the DOJ/FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email has been released – OIG RELEASE LINK HERE

This IG inquiry is specifically looking into whether the FBI investigation was corrupted by political influence in their determination of the Clinton outcome. The IG report provides background on the overall issues, the potential crimes; the subsequent coverup; and the corruption that infested the 2016 Department of Justice and the FBI.

Here’s The Report:

(pdf link)

.

Don’t Comment Unless You’ve Read The Full Report

Important note.  Read, but don’t focus on, the “executive summary” or “conclusions”; those two sections were written by political administrators in FBI and DOJ leadership.  Focus on the substance of the documented facts within the IG report.  You’ll note the specific facts don’t support the “summary/conclusion”.

Analysis will follow.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, Jeff Sessions, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

1,316 Responses to HERE IT IS – Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ Conduct During Clinton Investigation – Full 568 page pdf

  1. ezpz2 says:

    This will be like a Rorschach’s Test to the press, pols, and pundits alike.
    Everyone will selectively pull out those parts that can be spun in accordance with their agendas.

    Liked by 8 people

  2. ristvan says:

    Lurking Lawyer here. Read the entire executive summary as soon as it posted at DoJ OIG. Actual report is 499 pages, not got to that yet. Bottom lines: sloppy FBI, lots of violations of established policy including more private emails for official,business nonsense, and probably reason to fire Strzok. No criminality referrals appear foreshadowed, unless identified leaks/leakers have Hatch Act liability. Dunno. Requires reading Act and detailed report text.
    Comey portrayed as a rogue yet neither Yates nor Lunch reigned him in. Example, Comey did not have the legal standing to make his July 5 announcement, and deliberately kept Yates and Lynch in the dark about it. Most damning is the delay between Weiner laptop discovery and Comey’s letter to Congress in violation of DoJ policy. Malfeasance. IG empathetic with Comey’s reasons, not his decisions.
    Whole thing is shades of grey chopped liver.

    Liked by 25 people

    • Thank you Ristvan. Glad i didn’t have my hopes up.
      Does this report show that the investigation into the Clintons emails was done properly? Or I this just a report regarding political bias?

      I told myself that where ever the truth leads, I will accept it. I still believe Clinton is guilty of many crimes. I still believe that there is more to be revealed. Huber is who I have my attention on. He’s the prosecutor.

      Liked by 1 person

      • JRD says:

        Please get real.
        Screw Sessions and Q who flung poo.

        “Michael Horowitz does not challenge the decision not to prosecute Mrs. Clinton, nor does he find that the FBI had any political bias in reaching that decision.”

        Liked by 2 people

      • farmhand1927 says:

        You can count now on Huber if you choose. Others can hang hopes on Sessions unrecusing. We’ve about done run out of people to count on to make sure the law is applied equally and that justice is blind.

        The media will make sure the perps walk free. Even Strzok and Page were ‘cooperating’ in order to get immunity. Sure looks like the whole truck load of ’em are off the hook and Mueller will muscle on.

        Liked by 3 people

      • ristvan says:

        MMA, sadly JRD cites the actual IG conclusions. Concerning the email investigation up to July 5, IG says many tough choices but nothing improper found. So very unlikely Clinton email investigation would be reopened.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Phil aka Felipe says:

      “Whole thing is shades of grey chopped liver” that’s been laying out in the sun too long and good for nothing but drawing a bunch of flies…oh, what a foul smell.

      Liked by 3 people

    • patrickhenrycensored says:

      Reminiscent of mediation in divorce proceedings wherein each side loses and wins equally, in an effort to clear the case.

      Liked by 5 people

    • smartyjones1 says:

      Haven’t read all of the summary but a view on different sections, (it’s searchable) brings to mind how Lisa Page ridiculed Loretta Lynch to Peter Strzok.

      She mocked her public statement in advance of the decision by the FBI (Comey as it turns out) by saying something like, “nice of her to accept the recommendation, being she already knows the outcome.”

      Based on this alone, the IG Report is a big pile of KAKA.

      Don’t even get me started about the “insurance policy” to “stop” Donald Trump and how that isn’t political bias.

      Liked by 2 people

      • blind no longer says:

        This is yet another CROOKED, CORRUPT government coverup!!! Screw these people. I have no faith in anyone but President Trump. Forget investigations they are ALWAYS corrupt!

        Like

    • JonMaxwell says:

      They also did not care to reign him in, all they think needs to be done here are some tweaks in the way the FBI does things, so unless someone gets indicted for usurping the authority of the AG then this is all just smoke and mirrors to appease the people.

      The only way this crap is going to get fixed is by we the people, there are now clearly rules for us and rules fro them.

      Liked by 2 people

    • farmhand1927 says:

      Sounds like the worst news for Comey is that the President did indeed have justifiable reasons for firing him. Meanwhile, back to the book tour…..

      Liked by 2 people

    • StanH says:

      No surprise here folks. Look for the swamp to protect their fiefdoms, DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, …can’t have people losing faith in the system. These are generational cash cows. Politicians hail and revere these institutions as if their mortgages were at stake?! There is simply no way that Michael Horowitz was going to harpoon these venerable institutions -sarc. At any rate give it a week or so, and let the Sundances of the world give it a once over twice, and remember sometimes, “the best laid plans…” can be mucked up in ones own hubris. That being said, “chopped liver” is apt.

      Oh, stick with Mr. Trump, follow his lead.

      MAGA!

      Like

    • singular says:

      Seeing how the sausage was made. Disgusting.

      Like

    • dalethorn says:

      But Sundance already told you that – to consider the facts in the report, not the summary.

      Like

  3. rsmith1776 says:

    NOT off-topic: such an OBVIOUS diversion – the corrupt NY A.G. announces at the same time a bogus lawsuit against the Trump Foundation.

    How predictable can these corrupt snakes be??

    Liked by 6 people

  4. SR says:

    RR already read the report so it seems he is not going anywhere. Looking forward the words from AG and what would he do except firing – Strzok and Page.

    Like

    • Nigella says:

      Page is already gone

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jay J says:

      Rod Rosenstein is mentioned in this report two times on page 431…in the footnotes. Grassley had written a letter about McCabe possibly violating the Hatch act. OIG thought this was out of his jurisdiction to investigate this. This report doesn’t have anything to do really with RR.

      Like

  5. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Bob Thoms says:

    Navigating the report is difficult. Can folks please post page numbers when they reference noted items from the report. Thanks in advance.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. dizzymissl says:

    page 412

    2. Instant Messages Commenting on Trump or Clinton
    On August 29, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages as part of a discussion about their jobs. The sender of each message is noted after the timestamp.
    10:39:49, Agent 1: “I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an absolute fucking idiot. If you dont think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drumpf.”
    10:40:13, Agent 5: “i forgot about drumpf…”
    10:40:27, Agent 5: “that’s so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him.”
    10:40:43, Agent 5: “someone who can’t answer a question”
    10:40:51, Agent 5: “someone who can’t be professional for even a second”
    On September 9, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages.
    08:56:43, Agent 5: “i’m trying to think of a ‘would i rather’ instead of spending time with those people”
    08:56:54, Agent 1: “stick your tongue in a fan??”
    08:56:58, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump”
    08:57:03, Agent 1: “ha”
    08:57:15, Agent 1: “french toast with drumpf”
    08:57:19, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump and a bunch of his supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded”
    08:57:23, Agent 5: “:)”

    Liked by 2 people

    • bosscook says:

      This page needs to be a mid-terms ad.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Lemmy says:

      So sophisticated, mature, and nuanced. Not like those retarded Trump voters from Ohio.

      Liked by 8 people

      • EvilWulf says:

        Hey, I’m a retarded Trump voter from Ohio.

        Yay! I’m famous.

        Liked by 2 people

        • calbear84 says:

          Wulf how did you find your way to your polling place? Did a bus come and pick you up (handing you a conveniently filled out ballot) or did some nice volunteer come to your nursing home and help you vote?
          Seriously, from the truly retarded state of California, I thank you and your fellow Ohioans for delivering us President Donald J. Trump on that magnificent day.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Jay J says:

      Just because you are an agent, doesn’t mean you have to be happy with your administration. I’m SURE, there were many who absolutely HATED Obama. They saw what he was doing, knew it was horrible, and just plugged along…it’s a job.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sgt Stryker says:

      No “political bias”…..YFKM?
      III/0317

      Liked by 2 people

    • farmhand1927 says:

      Hey Strzok and Page, we don’t think much of you two hacks that wasted our money plotting against Trump instead of doing your jobs. We were signing your paychecks, by the way. Go stick your tongues in a fan, why don’t ya?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Angel Martin says:

      basically a whitewash, unfortunately. Eg look at the assessment of allowing Cheryl Mills to sit in on the Clinton interview as an “attorney”.

      The one thing it does do – the texts and IM’s demonstrate the total Trump hating (and Trump supporters hating) bias of this whole FBI gang.

      Not just Strzok and Page, but FBI Agent 1, FBI Agent 5, Lawyer 1, Lawyer 2.

      Start at pg 420 of the report and read.

      Now that the FBI is proved as biased, they no longer get the benefit of the doubt on Trump Russia, FISA, Trump campaign spying, surveillance.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Me says:

      Speaking of acting professionally; using your work phones to text your high school girl sh** fits is not professional conduct. It really is a class war. All I hear is that hicks and the uneducated voted for the Orange One and that the elites are elite and genteel and we are unwashed and crass. So I will not be crass and swing a 2 x 4.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 3 people

    • Jay J says:

      I just saw a news story that said McCaskill requested of the FAA no tracking for her airplane that she was traveling in. I did not know that these people could request that. You’d think air traffic controllers would need to know where planes are, so to protect from collision.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Steven says:

        I think it’s related to filing a flight plan. I believe you are required to file your flight plan with a local control before you can fly, if you go beyond a certain distance. If you just fly around then land back to the same airstrip, you don’t have to file anything.

        Anyway, McCaskill may try to avoid doing the flight plan filings, but yes, the control will still track you, especially if you go above a certain ceiling level.

        Like

      • Somebody says:

        It depends on the type of plane. I assume her plane flew VFR (visual flight rules). Usually only smaller planes fly VFR. The pilot is responsible for separation when flying VFR. There are rules as to where you can fly VFR and how high, but those vary depending on the airspace.

        If flying VFR that would mean no data block on her plane, but unless the plane was flying really low which I doubt its signature was still picked up. The signature would show as a blip and the ATC would do a point out to other pilots. Example Delta 459, VFR traffic heading 090, flight level 80. Depending on factors he might tell him more, for instance if the VFR plane was on a course where it was going to cross his path he would advise the other plane of that.

        Bottom line if someone REALLY wanted to see where her flight went, pull the tapes. You could figure it out based on where and when the plane took off.

        Like

  9. NoJuan Importante says:

    I think we know now this entire situation will be resolved, if anywhere, at the ballot box. It’s not like we haven’t been down this road before. How to put the evidence before the public that we have massively biased and left-leaning government agencies that need years of revamping is the challenge.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Countrywatch says:

    Here is Neon Revolt on action that is needed: contact congressmen to ensure unredacted report is released:
    https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/14/a-call-to-arms-the-roaring-majority-newq-qanon-greatawakening-declassify-fulldisclosure-tellthetruth/

    “So we’re getting the heavily redacted version of the #IGReport later today.

    The House Freedom Caucus will then push for an unredacted, declassified version – because all these redactions will indicate a profound conflict-of-interest, and subsequently lead to the firing or Rod Rosenstein. After all, he’s the guy they implicate, and he’s only censoring all this to save his scrawny behind!

    What #QAnon needs from us now is to CONTACT OUR REPRESENTATIVES.

    Q needs every single one of us calling our rep, demanding a declassified IG report – I’d say starting around 1, maybe 2 in the afternoon, EST.

    Don’t ignore this. If you don’t PUSH for this, it’s not going to happen. We need every voice in Congress screaming for declassification, and the only way that happens is if YOU, their constituents, demand it.

    Don’t know how to contact your rep?

    It’s easy. Just go here:…
    https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Joe says:

    It’s a good thing the IG report personnel were smart enough to know that finding no bias was important to re-establish confidence in government. Their continued capacity for lying is such a comfort.

    Liked by 9 people

  12. SR says:

    IG report did not try to find what is inside private emails or they also have yoga schedule like Hillary.

    Like

  13. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Jay J says:

    Hillary was said 106 times.
    Hillary Clinton was said 98 times.
    Clinton was said more than 999 times in this report.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Dougs says:

    I’ll be reading over the weekend however from the preliminary spin it appears the DOJ is content to lower the bar for conduct inside justice system
    Another step closer to police state banana republic

    Liked by 5 people

  16. Phil Free says:

    I am highly disappointed. It appears to say that, “in their review”, they found no probable cause suggesting that Clinton had -any- idea what emails were actually classified, so sees zero issues or problems w/ Clinton’s email handling.
    I did a bunch of jumping around and skimming, but — I’m seeing a WHOLE bunch of .. nothing.
    This is the largest “nothing”-burger I think I’ve ever seen. 568 pages of “nothing to see here”??

    Even where Stroke says with his “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”, it seems the report goes to lengths to not find any problems with this, beyond suggesting that FBI devices really shouldn’t have been used to make polarizing statements. What? What??

    I’ll say again — I skimmed. I hurried. Perhaps there’s more here in small details I’m not seeing.
    But .. so far .. my half-a$$ed review is telling me that I don’t quite have the proper vocabulary words to best describe how much of a complete waste of time and a total sellout this report is.

    I will be EXTREMELY pleased to be wrong. D@mnit, I want to be wrong on this one.

    Liked by 4 people

  17. Wink says:

    I’m going to wait for a few days till the dust settles before I dig into the report. Usually with any major event, it takes a few days for the solid information to come forward. Meanwhile, I’m going to read and mow the lawn. Love you, all. See you in a few days.

    Liked by 7 people

  18. Bob Thoms says:

    The over-arching theme of “no bias” is going to make prosecutions very difficult.

    Liked by 3 people

  19. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 5 people

  20. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Deedee says:

    I’m just wondering if the IG is looking at the damning New texts from Strzok to Page as not pertinent to the Clinton investigation bias but is pertinent to the investigation of FBI/Trump spygate “matter.” One can only hope.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Meatzilla says:

    So far, early analysis is not all that encouraging. Not very much at all thus far.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Firefly says:

      So far my read is there isn’t much new, it’s heavily sanitized, and only admits to minor mistakes. The recommendations like putting a banner on cell phones, training …are insulting to what really happened. Mostly looks like whitewash/coverup.

      Bet Rosenstein grinned and said happy birthday Mr. President- here’s the IG report. We’re getting right on putting warning banners on cell phones. Happy Flag day too!

      Liked by 2 people

  23. Dora says:

    Liked by 8 people

  24. Hmmm... says:

    Interesting that the IG did likely recover the missing Page/Stzrok texts. They note this but as far as I am aware they have not been released.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  26. Paul B. says:

    From the Bloomberg synopsis of the report, this is a whitewash. There’s just enough negativity to make it seem realistic, but the damnable conclusions are withheld. If we have enough to indict Comey, the IG certainly does after so many months of intense investigation. No other conclusion can be drawn from Comey’s actions, than that he, Loretta Lynch, and the upper echelon of the FBI is politicized and corrupted.

    As it is, this report gives the Dems plenty of basis to say “nothingburger” and sound plausible to much of the general public.

    This report needs a hard pushback. If the IG’s original is better, then the IG needs to go to Sessions and inform him that deputy AG Rosenstein has corrupted it with his emendations and redactions. At that point Sessions either unrecuses himself or reports the matter to Trump, who takes executive action and starts the housecleaning process at the top, so that the normal DOJ checks against corruption can kick in.

    Liked by 4 people

  27. StanH says:

    Don’t be surprised, the swamp is doing what the swamp does. The difference is Mr. Trump. be cool and let the swamp spin.

    Liked by 6 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Trump may have just let Rod Rosenstein give him all the rope needed to TIE UP THAT CROOK AND THROW HIM OUT.

      You know what I’m sensing? THEY DID THE SAME THING AS THE “MID-YEAR EXAM” INVESTIGATION.

      What do I mean by that?

      “Oh, it’s SO bad, SO bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad. But nobody MEANT to be bad, so no charges. The end.”

      This is the SAME HORRIBLE DOJ BILL CLINTON AND OBAMA CREATED.

      The report is just the same old Washington game. It’s Rosenstein playing Roosterhead.

      They DIDN’T EVEN SAY that we needed a new investigation. They CLEARED the old one.

      This is GARBAGE. MORE CORRUPT THAN PUTIN.

      Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it, Washington.

      Like

  28. stringplayer55 says:

    Page i: “The Midyear investigation focused on whether Clinton intended to transmit classified information on unclassified systems, knew that information included in the unmarked emails was classified, or later became aware that information was classified and failed to report it.”

    WTF? With 99.999% certainty, I believe this summary is taken directly from documents laying out the FBI’s investigative parameters for the MYE. But why doesn’t it read: “The Midyear investigation focused on whether Clinton transmitted classified information on unclassified servers or in any other way violated government requirements pertaining to security of government documents.”

    I guess the FBI was going to use Comey’s keen power to peer into the mind of those that he engages, his ability to mind meld, to determine intent and knowledge. Either that, or the fix was in from the beginning with the FBI structuring the investigation in such a way that if Clinton didn’t just up and confess “Yeah, I Intended to transmit classified information on unclassified systems to enable this nation’s enemies easy access to some of our nation’s most closely guarded secrets. Moreover, I knew that some information included in unmarked emails was classified and at times, when I was subsequently made aware of secure classification status of some emails, I failed to report that.”

    Not to be satisfied with such nebulous framing of the investigation, it sure didn’t hurt the FBI’s efforts to exonerate Clinton when they granted immunity to everyone around Clinton and then allowed them all to destroy evidence that could might shed light even on the FBI’s nebulously structured investigation.

    Liked by 2 people

    • L4grasshopper says:

      The IG seems as eager to downplay and flat out ignore the criminal negligence by Hillary and her posse as was Comey.

      Negligence has nothing to do with intent.

      The fact that a Cabinet Officer who’s job was dealing with foreign governments INTENTIONALLY decided to operate from a non govt private computer meant that the risk of having classified info on that computer was certain. She took no measures to make sure it did not happen. She literally did not care. At best. (I’m of the belief she knew classified stuff was on that server, but proving that would be difficult).

      For myself and the millions of honest present and former civilian and military folks who worked with classified info and understood the reqs to safeguard it, the IGs excuse for Hillary that the absence of labels excused her was beyond insulting.

      Liked by 2 people

  29. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Dances with Wolverines says:

    In closing remember. she was suppose to win.

    Liked by 2 people

  31. mormoninsider says:

    “As described in more detail in Chapter Five, our review found examples where Comey or McCabe approved or directed specific investigation decisions. These included directing the Midyear agents to deliver a preamble at the first interview of Cheryl Mills about the need to answer questions about the process used to cull former Secretary Clinton’ s personal and work-related emails, without informing the prosecutors; authorizing Baker to contact Beth Wilkinson, counsel to Mills and Samuelson, again without telling the prosecutors; approving the consent and immunity agreements used to obtain the Mills and Samuelson laptops; and not prohibiting Mills and Samuelson from attending the interview of former Secretary Clinton as her counsel.” 49

    Like

  32. WRB says:

    From the executive summary:
    In undertaking our analysis, our *task* whitewash was made significantly more difficult because of text and instant messages exchanged on FBI devices and systems by five FBI employees involved in the Midyear investigation.

    I think they meant whitewash where they put in task. Totally infuriating.

    Liked by 1 person

    • 6x47 says:

      Part of the difficulty faced by the IG is he has only the records (which are deliberately sparse and full of gaping holes) and testimony of people who covered their tracks pretty well and are experts at fabricating and maintaining plausible deniability.

      Prosecutors are free to draw conclusions where the IG eschewed doing so.

      Liked by 1 person

  33. Donzo says:

    The IG states it is not his role to second guess discretionary decisions. Comey’s discetionary decision not to prosecute was based upon his phony notion that intent on Clinton’s part was material in the prosecutorial decision-making process when it isn’t material per foundational espionage law. Therefore, if the Director misapplies the correct definition of the law with the intent to use it to avoid prosecution he can be absolved and never considered to have obstructed justice in that way by his discretionary prerogatives. That is a whitewash. There’s too much evidence showing that the FBI did not follow procedure and that that failure to do so only supported one conclusion – not to prosecute.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sdl921 says:

      You’re exactly right. This is a FUNDAMENTAL flaw in the OIG’s methodology and analysis.

      Liked by 3 people

    • 4sure says:

      The IG said that “intent” was considered in past case decisions by FBI/DOJ NOT to prosecute and that this instance involving Clinton, was in keeping w/past policies and interpretations of the law. So, all is good.

      Like

      • JX says:

        The server just magically appeared in her home and Clinton did not intend to use the server. It’s just something that happened and was beyond her control.

        The lies coming out of the government are beyond insulting.

        Like

    • Pat Frederick says:

      it was my understanding that deciding TO PROSECUTE is NOT Comey’s decision to make– discretionary or otherwise. The IG clearly says Comey usurped Lynch’s duty there. She may have decided to accept his SUGGESTION, but he cannot and should not be making that decision for her. The FBI investigates…it’s right there in their name…smh

      Like

  34. phoenixRising says:

    Like

  35. SR says:

    This is the best news for Clinton after long time. All focus on FBI and their text messages. There is no talk about Clinton email, server, classified and super access emails, Obama was communicating to Hillary’s email and more. She and her aides are not going to prison.

    Like

    • Nigella says:

      Did you really think they were because of this report?

      Like

    • mimbler says:

      I’m not delighted so far with my reading of the report, but the scope of this report was never intended to discuss Hillary’s guilt or innocence. That is a follow-on investigation.

      Liked by 5 people

      • 4sure says:

        This report was supposed to determine if the investigation by the FBI/DOJ into Clinton’s handling of classified material was conducted properly and w/no political bias involved w/the outcome. It clearly shows that the investigation was not done according to FBI/DOJ policy and procedures and that personal political bias did influence the investigation.

        Thus the investigation needs to be reopened and conducted properly. I see no recomendation from IG to that effect. WHY NOT?

        Like

        • Cetera says:

          It specifically states that there was no bias and no evidence of bias anywhere.

          The fact that it then goes on to document the bias that supposedly doesn’t exist is more or less irrelevant. This IS a WHITEWASH.

          Like

        • JX says:

          After documenting numerous instances of bias Horowitz claims “no bias”. It’s Comey all over again, document numerous instances of violations of law and then exonerate.

          Like

          • TPW says:

            There has got to be some recourse for we the people…….class action…..I don’t know that much about law……but they have got to get the message from us that we are not buying what they’re selling……I fully expected this….but there still was some small speck of hope I was hanging onto. Mr. President ….it is time to lower the boom……tear the mask off the whole damn thing then unleash the hounds. WAR

            Like

        • mimbler says:

          First answer, is this looks like a fairly slick coverup, admit to the facts, but ascribe innocent motives. Kind of like Comey did with Hillary.

          Second answer would be; isn’t that already a follow up task for the IG? Perhaps I’m dreaming or mis-remembering that though.

          Liked by 1 person

  36. mimbler says:

    That’s my take. From the executive summary and the conclusion, there is a diminishing of the facts in a direction away from prosecution.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 3 people

    • Nigella says:

      So prosecute them all… Last time I heard ,she was in “charge.” Shouldn’t she have taken the blame?

      Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      Rediculous indeed. There are too many criminals to charge anyone! Note to self, commit any future crimes when surrounded by criminals.

      Like

    • 6x47 says:

      When in doubt, FILE CHARGES. Let the Grand Jury sort ’em out.

      Like

    • 6x47 says:

      So, let me see if I understand here:

      1. Hillary Clinton INDISPUTABLY ran an out of control Dept. of State, mishandled sensitive classified information in the most egregious manner possible, set up her own personal/private email server to avoid federal records and thwart FOIA requests … but she didn’t INTEND to expose secret information, so it’s cool. No prob.

      2. Donald Trump ALLEGEDLY asked about the limits of the President’s Constitutional Authority regarding pardons and in regards to the DOJ and Special Counsel … and is investigated for obstructing justice. Which didn’t happen, but he might have been THINKING about it, and must be IMPEACHED!

      Riiiiight.

      Liked by 3 people

  38. 6x47 says:

    Just skimming through the Executive Summary, I am struck by the incredibly difficult position Hillary Clinton put everyone in. Her gobsmacking corruption and unmitigated sense of entitlement put the Democratic Party and the Obama Administration in the unenviable position of having to whitewash and help cover up her multitude of crimes but do so “credibly” by avoiding the appearance of doing exactly that.

    Most corrupt politicians at least have the brains and decency to avoid public displays of criminality. Not Hillary Clinton!

    Comey had to bend over backwards and twist himself into pretzels to avoid charging her. I have long been convinced that his reasons for making his public statements was motivated in no small part by his righteous anger at the embarrassment Clinton had caused him and the FBI. Not for being a crook, but for sullying everyone else with it.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Donzo says:

    Well, Mr. Sessions, are you satisfied? Has your leadership revived the integrity of the DOJ after a year and a half?

    Liked by 1 person

  40. HHC - 2nd 16th says:

    Somehow, I don’t feel too confident much will come of this report.

    Like

  41. sixofone says:

    I’m reminded of Lisa Simpson at the essay contest from the spectacular Season 3 episode “Mr. Lisa Goes to Washington”:

    “Washington, D.C. was built on a swamp some 200 years ago, and not much has changed — it stank then and it stinks now.”

    Like

  42. letty bromenschenkel says:

    biggest cover up in the history of the USA

    Liked by 1 person

    • Paco Loco says:

      Yup! There is no “ there” there in the report. It’s a white wash designed to exonerate Comey, Clinton and their posse of DoJ and FBI administrators. Oh gee there are some damning anti-Trump text messages and Comey over stated his authority. Big friggen deal. We waited a year for this garbage. Read it and weep Trumpsters, the Deep State is still running the show. I was hoping that Huber would unleash the hounds to get the traitors and seditionists, and maybe he still will, but I’m not going to hold my breath.

      Like

  43. Wightman farm says:

    Well, I guess our tick has tocked.

    Like

  44. Charles says:

    Probably already noted in comments, but: I searched Trump – 121 results. First result below page 4.
    “In undertaking our analysis, our task was made
    significantly more difficult because of text and instant
    messages exchanged on FBI devices and systems by
    five FBI employees involved in the Midyear
    investigation. These messages reflected political
    opinions in support of former Secretary Clinton and
    against her then political opponent, Donald Trump.
    Some of these text messages and instant messages
    mixed political commentary with discussions about the
    Midyear investigation, and raised concerns that political
    bias may have impacted investigative decisions.”

    Like

  45. Nigella says:

    Comey has made a statement saying he appreciates the IG blah,blah,blah

    Like

  46. Octavia says:

    Expecting you may want to do what you can, I attached a link below regarding a Petition regarding redactions.
    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/unredacted-declassification-department-justice-inspector-general-report-public-viewing

    Liked by 1 person

    • ristvan says:

      Silly, because there aren’t any.

      Like

      • Octavia says:

        The above referenced petition is for redactions in the Russian Collusion Investigation and Clinton Email Scandal documents to cover up unclassified information. The Department of Justice or FBI has redacted for elimination of embarrassment to their own.

        I do not understand your comment, “Silly, because they aren’t any.” Please explain.

        Like

  47. johneb18 says:

    This report is willful blindness. Toothless.

    Like

  48. Joe says:

    This IG report confirms the suspicions of those who realize something remains very, very, very rotten in Denmark.

    Liked by 2 people

    • mazziflol says:

      It’s fine…after being goaded for so long to wait for this supposedly explosive release, the cycle now continues as we are pushed by our peers to wait for the next report focusing on FISA. I can hardly wait for Gowdy’s next pre-fabricated statement of of fake outrage.

      Like

      • JX says:

        It’s mid-June. There’s not much here that hasn’t been known for months.

        It is another instance of DOJ foot dragging.

        Like

  49. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 8 people

  50. mormoninsider says:

    On page 61 and 62 Axelrod and Lynch basically call Comey a liar but then Toscas’s account backs up Comey to a degree. This is a discussion about calling the investigation a “matter.”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s