Sarah Sanders White House Press Briefing – Monday March 12th, 2:30pm Livestream…

Sarah Huckabee Sanders holds the White House press briefing for Monday March 12th, 2018.  Anticipated start time approximately 2:30pm EST

UPDATE: Video Added

WH Livestream LinkRSBN Livestream LinkPBS Livestream Link

Advertisements
This entry was posted in media bias, President Trump, Press Secretary - Trump. Bookmark the permalink.

89 Responses to Sarah Sanders White House Press Briefing – Monday March 12th, 2:30pm Livestream…

  1. Ditch Mitch says:

    Here we go again folks. What will be the insignificant topic of discussion?

    Liked by 3 people

  2. appadoo9 says:

    and who didn’t show up from the Houston Astros

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Nchadwick says:

    Ready for the triggered Pressitutes….

    My predictions majority will be

    Presidential bullying Todd, Waters, and Oprah

    Few jabs asking if President Trump is scared of the NRA… already see that headline floating around.

    The won’t be able to #Resist Stormy questions

    At least one on “fill in the blank” concerns about North Korea playing our “naive” president — I suspect this will be asked by April Ryan — and the person “concern” will be Crooked Hillary.

    Those are my predictions…

    Liked by 2 people

  4. WSB says:

    Land of the Acosta’d.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Nigella says:

    It will be all porn star

    Liked by 1 person

    • fleporeblog says:

      Absolutely since according to the WSJ, she is willing to payback the $130K in order to be released from speaking!

      Like

      • fleporeblog says:

        Liked by 7 people

        • fleporeblog says:

          In reference to this BS tweet!

          Liked by 2 people

          • mimbler says:

            Yes, just rediculous. We are supposed to believe they would prefer someone like Kamala Harris to Trump?

            Liked by 3 people

          • Ditch Mitch says:

            Ahh,,,the failing NYT interviewing 2 women out of how many white evangelical women. Must be a collapses in PDJT’s support.

            Since they mention Nikkie I wonder if these 2 were originally nevertrumpers. Maybe “open boarders” Rubio or “teddy bear” Cruz supporters.

            Liked by 5 people

            • singingsoul says:

              I hope that is not true that Evangelical woman distancing themselves from POTUS..?
              I know they would not vote for a radical left but might not vow at all. Not voting is giving a vote to the opposite .
              When Romney run for President the Evangelical out of the hills did not vote. I live in Appalachia and those people are very pro America and most have served in the military. They are good hard working people and many come from poor beginnings.

              Like

              • Blacksmith8 says:

                slow down just a little bit.
                it’s the ny slimes. who cares what they say?

                how do you know if the pic is even related to the non story?
                they found 2 semi egg shell tone skinned females somewhere in new york?
                wow, that must be tough.

                Ask those women if they were on the hildabeast voting bus throughout the five buroughs last november.

                Liked by 3 people

                • Roger Duroid says:

                  Just saying, but they look like angry ***** to me. Good bye, go enjoy watching Opra reruns.

                  Like

                • Cuppa Covfefe says:

                  They look like angry Unitarians to me. Nothing at all to do with Evangelical.

                  Then again, the term “Evangelism” has pretty much lost its original meaning when you can have an “Apple Evangelist” as part of your IT staff…

                  Liked by 1 person

              • 17CatsInTN says:

                This Evangelical Charismatic is not. That’s for dern sure. 😉

                Liked by 2 people

              • I need a president that puts Americans first whether they like it or not. My preacher is my moral leader, not my president. He didn’t run on being a moral leader he ran on MAGA.

                Liked by 3 people

              • Sylvia Avery says:

                Honestly, I can’t imagine an Evangelical woman “tiptoeing” away from PDJT. We ALL knew he wasn’t a choir boy.

                Sure, in the beginning I questioned in my heart and in my prayers why we couldn’t have someone a little more, well, holy. But I got my answer. Yeah, I’m one of those who believes when prayerfully sought answers are given. So take that, Joy Behar, and stick it where the sun doesn’t shine.

                So now I have proved my point. I’m not very holy, either. I do not bear much of a witness to Christian qualities or Christian love far too much of the time. I struggle with that, okay?

                But I realized I wasn’t voting for a pastor or a spiritual leader, but I really really liked that Donald Trump was very interested and, sincere, and outspoken about preserving religious freedom for Americans after I had been uneasily watching the erosion of that basic right along with so many others.

                I don’t think I am any smarter than anyone else, well, Maxine Waters excepted. I can’t honestly imagine why anyone, white, black, Evangelical, Catholic, Hindu, or whatever would suddenly decide PDJT can no longer be supported. Because he called some fool an SOB? Gasp! Like you don’t hear that on TV all the time???? Because he is accused by some of adulterous affairs? I don’t get it. And I frankly don’t believe it.

                Liked by 4 people

              • Sharon says:

                So pettiness and impulsiveness means more than more jobs, fantastic economy, deporting criminals and draining the swamp and stopping a NWO! Getting rid of the corruption! Geez some people are stupid!

                Like

          • TreeClimber says:

            Got my first political opinion poll call the other day, White Evangelical woman supported PTrump! (And schooled my interviewers, thanks to Sundance!)

            Liked by 4 people

          • Charlotte says:

            WaPo’s Michael Gerson: Evangelicals Who Support Trump Are ‘Slimy Political Operatives, Not Moral Leaders’

            http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/03/11/wapos-michael-gerson-evangelicals-support-trump-slimy-political-operatives-not-moral-leaders/

            Liked by 1 person

          • benifranlkin says:

            Black and white sad bags…nice touch…over meet hill…
            Evangelicals women are joyful…that’s how I know these 2 aren’t either

            Liked by 1 person

          • littleanniesfannie says:

            This one’s right there with the Lion. Pettiness? As opposed to a downright criminal? And what about the party she represented? They were not impulsive—their crimes were not only well-planned they were totally dishonest! Petty—nope, these were felonies committed against PDJT and the American people!! Profanity—I’ll give you that one. One out of three is all you have. Pathetic for the amount you’ve cost American taxpayers with your contrived charges.
            Get a grip and get a life. You people are sick!!

            Liked by 2 people

          • Sylvia Avery says:

            Ha, ha, ha! In yer dreams, Yashar.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Angry Dumbo says:

            In situations like these, my dear late mother used to always advise me “consider the source.” Upon consideration, you lost me at NYT. Won’t even give them a click.

            Liked by 1 person

  6. WesternWhere says:

    This looks like the deep state in seeking democratic power by running as Democrats.

    http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/no-precedent-us-political-history-extraordinary-number-ex-cia-operatives-running-congress-democrats/

    An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.

    If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress. […]

    One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (57) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (35), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (19) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ditch Mitch says:

      TGP doing their usual sensationalizing. So the IC thinks they could take over and run the Congress? They must not have confidence in the left wing radical faction of the dims party. They would be more effective remaining in their gov’t positions.

      Liked by 2 people

      • WesternWhere says:

        “TGP doing their usual sensationalizing”

        Well, maybe, but it’s not even their scoop.

        https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html

        Liked by 1 person

        • Charlotte says:

          Time to name those CA operatives and start digging

          Like

          • Charlotte says:

            Its all in the World Socialist Web–I guess they disapprove. That was the introduction.
            Here is part 2 and 3:

            Agents and war commanders:

            There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

            Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering.
            https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/08/dems-m08.html

            From the State Department to Capitol Hill:

            Candidates from a military-intelligence background are seeking the Democratic Party nomination in 40 percent of the congressional districts targeted by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the 2018 elections. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries. If the Democratic military-intelligence candidates won all 44 of the districts in which they are running—which is theoretically possible, if very unlikely—they would constitute, as a bloc, ten percent of the membership of the House of Representatives.
            https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/09/dems-m09.html

            Like

            • Charlotte says:

              The Names are all there.Dig guys,dig.

              Like

              • Charlotte says:

                In a sense, the Democratic Party’s promotion of a large number of military-intelligence candidates for competitive districts represents an insurance policy for the US ruling elite. In the event of a major swing to the Democrats, the House of Representatives will receive an influx of new members drawn primarily from the national security apparatus, trusted servants of American imperialism.

                Parenthetically, it should be noted that there would be no comparable influx of Bernie Sanders supporters or other “left”-talking candidates in the event of a Democratic landslide. Only five of the 221 candidates reviewed in this study had links to Sanders or billed themselves as “progressive.” None is likely to win the primary, let alone the general election.

                When the dust clears after November 6, 2018, there will almost certainly be more former CIA agents in the Democratic caucus in the House of Representatives than former Sanders activists. It is the military-intelligence operatives who constitute the spine of the Democratic Party, not the Sanders “Our Revolution” group. This is a devastating verdict on the claims of the Vermont senator, backed by various pseudo-left groups, that it is possible to reform the Democratic Party and push it to the left.

                The preponderance of national security operatives in the Democratic primaries sheds additional light on the nature of the Obama administration. Far from representing a resurgence of liberal reformism, as apologists for the Democrats like the International Socialist Organization claimed at the time of his election, Obama’s eight years in office marked the further ascendancy of the military-intelligence apparatus within the Democratic Party.

                This is demonstrated by the subsequent role of his top personnel. Among the former Obama civilian officials who are running in the Democratic primaries for seats in the House of Representatives, 16 served in the State Department, Pentagon, Department of Homeland Security or National Security Council, while only five served in domestic agencies. One of those, Haley Stevens, was chief of staff for the Obama auto industry task force, which imposed 50 percent wage cuts on newly hired auto workers. Among the five, only Stevens is considered a likely winner in the primary.

                The Democratic Party has always been a party of the American capitalist class, and that means, from the dawn of the 20th century on, it has been a party of imperialism and imperialist war, whatever the occasional “peace” noises made by its candidates for the purpose of diverting and derailing mass antiwar sentiment among the American people.

                Liked by 1 person

                • Cuppa Covfefe says:

                  They may have a few points there, but considering their WWP (far, far left) position, their articles should be taken with a few grains (ok, spoons) of salt. I spent a couple of hours running down various articles on their site, and checking the links, etc. Almost EVERY time it came down to “the plight of the workers” and “the evils of capitalism”…

                  Interesting information, but somewhat along the lines of “even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then”…

                  And there was nothing much to posit the possibility that there would be fake candidates on the right side of the spectrum. But I think we all have refined BS detectors now…

                  Like

    • Sylvia Avery says:

      Leftists never, ever, ever give up. Never. We’d do well to remember that.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sharon says:

      Go ahead and run you slimy criminals! The sunlight will just expose you!😂

      Like

  7. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Sarah needs to start every Press Briefing with the names of the Nominees that the Dems are holding up for confirmation. This is ridiculous. Some have been out of committee for months and have been stalled. Grenell is being deliberately stalled. This has to be called out every day and not every now and then!

    Liked by 12 people

  8. Pelicansview says:

    Meanwhile, back in the swamp, the deep state has quietly re-assigned Paul Manafort’s lawsuit against the DOJ and Rosenstein to radical, leftist, Judge Amy Berman Jackson (Obama Appointed). Manafort is about the only person who has any legal standing to challenge the appointment of Special Counsel Mueller, which was fallaciously executed based on false premises with no foundational crime specified, as required under the law.

    Judge Amy will deep six Manafort’s lawsuit faster than Congress leaving Capitol Hill for spring break. It’s plain to see the Potomac 2-step is in full swing now and working to protect Mueller’s malevolent mission at all cost.

    Liked by 6 people

  9. Ditch Mitch says:

    “that is not what I said”, “you continually misunderstand or misrepresent what I say”. How many times has Sarah had to correct the prestitutes.

    Liked by 3 people

    • fleporeblog says:

      Especially that condescending POS! That man maybe April’s son!

      Liked by 2 people

    • MVW says:

      The press are truly infantile, repeating the same badgering questions trying to get their way. Sarah has super patience only because she is a mother and used to dealing with the tantrums of small children, although I doubt her children were as misbehaved as those high paid ones in the press room.

      Like

      • MVW says:

        Funny thing is that most of these grown children have spouses. For sure, you know they don’t get away with misbehaving like this at home.

        Like

  10. burnett044 says:

    Lol April always has a look on her face like she has cat poop smeared under her nose…
    I truly could not do Sarah`s job…the desire to b!tch slap would over take me..I am sure..

    Liked by 10 people

  11. Guyski says:

    Guns, guns, guns. Banning smart phones until the age of 21 would be more impactful then anything else.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Blacksmith8 says:

      sorry errant brain moment:

      fast foward 2 years.

      HEADLINE: New state law in Illinois, no txting while shooting.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Guyski says:

      What is weird is you can search the internet machine and find countless articles about the correlation of social media and suicides. If someone can kill themselves because of social media you don’t think someone else would go the opposite direction because of social media?

      Like

      • Psycho Monkee says:

        Guyski, social media + suicides. This topic was covered at a Men’s Spiritual Conference this past Saturday in MKE. You are correct, there is a correlation. Well worthwhile to view “4 Levels of Happiness” by Fr. Spitzer. YouTube, less than an hour.

        Like

      • Matthew LeBlanc says:

        Excellent point. Suicide is the ultimate violence committed upon oneself. So makes sense they are driven to violence just outward instead of inward. Mad mad world.

        Like

  12. Nchadwick says:

    Here is my account of topics questions asked by the pressitutes – possible errors as I was working while listening/keeping score.,,

    Gun Policy Proposal – 12 total
    Of those 7 were directly in question to NRA and age — even one suggesting that the President chickened out and backed out of …

    North Korea Meeting – 5

    UK/Russia Nerve Agent – 3

    China -1

    Tariffs (congress block) -1

    California/Wall Visit -111

    Penn Election -1

    Saudis -1

    Note : April Ryan – was frantically waving her hand even though Sarah called last question, making all kinds of triggered faces. I believe as it ended and Sarah walking out of room — it was crybaby Acosta yelling to her to answer some question..

    Another day, another mockery they make of themselves… journalist, please give me a break!

    Like

  13. crazydawgg says:

    How can anyone stand Shepard Smith? FOX, needs to boot him to cnn.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. applevista says:

    Sara understands the Big Picture. She knows the press conferences are nothing more than providing a venue for piss-ant stompers to stomp on piss-ants while President Trump waters the Elephants.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. Charlotte says:

    ANTIFA +ISIS:

    FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link to Mandalay Bay Massacre

    https://truepundit.com/fbi-insiders-blow-whistle-massive-las-vegas-cover-agents-told-not-investigate-key-evidence-including-isis-terror-link-mandalay-bay-massacre/

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Charlotte says:

    Former Obama officials form anti-Trump national security think tank

    https://truepundit.com/former-obama-officials-form-anti-trump-national-security-think-tank/

    Like

  17. Mike diamond says:

    Sarah has talent and a gift to know how to deal with this liberal sick puppy press ! They never want to look happy,because they are never happy! They need to do away with daily press meetings!!!!!its a waste of time!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s