The New FBI Agency Everyone Forgot – Did Adam Schiff Just Get Caught in an Elaborate Counterintelligence Sting?…

By now everyone is likely aware of the Fake News story run by CNN on Friday surrounding an email received by Donald Trump Jr.  The email was part of the investigative evidence shared with the House Intelligence committee; and later leaked from within that committee to CNN – thereby initiating the false reporting on the content.

The central issue in the CNN story was the date of an email.

It was leaked from within the committee, and later reported by CNN, that the date was “September 4th, 2016”; a date convenient for a collusion narrative between Trump Jr and WikiLeaks.

However, the real date, on the actual email, was “September 14th, 2016”; a day after Wikileaks published the content of their DNC leaks and a date that makes the entire CNN report a ‘nothingburger’.

However, CNN reports that two independent sources originally leaked to them the contents of what they had seen on the email in question.  But CNN never saw the email, until later in the day.

Think about this carefully.

♦Two “independent sources” both looked at an email, and both came away from reading that email with the wrong date?   How is that possible?

It has been CTH contention for several weeks that a counterintelligence sting operation has been going on within the IC community.  False trails of information, seeded by ‘White Hat’ investigators, intended to be captured by ‘Black Hat’ leakers – and delivered to their usurping allies in media.  The stories are fake, the leaks are real.

All investigative documents, relating to the witness, are provided to the congressional committees prior to the interviews with the witnesses; or, if the information is classified, each committee member has an opportunity to review the documents via a controlled SCIF environment when no physical copies are allowed as part of the evidence.

The Don JR./Wikileaks email could very easily be part of a ‘sting’.  The date was intentionally seeded as incorrect.  The resulting story is fake. The leak, however, is real.

Each nugget of disinformation exposes a specific leaker.  Each trail used in the sharing of that disinformation exposes the enabling media.  The White Hat plants the fake news seed, and then watches to see where, when, how, to-whom, and from-whom, it shows up.

In this example, we believe it is most likely House Intelligence Committee Minority Chairman Adam Schiff was the recipient of the disinformation, and has now exposed himself as a leaker to an elite, previously undisclosed, investigative unit specifically assembling evidence of corruption and leaking at the highest levels of government.

The scale and strength of the CNN push-back, and specifically the tone in their refusal to even consider discussing source of the false information, further supports our supposition.

Keep in mind, Representative Adam Schiff is -as an outcome of his minority ranking on the House Intel Committee- a member of the elite congressional oversight “Gang of Eight”.

This is a VERY BIG deal.  The Gang of Eight holds oversight on every covert intelligence operation going on around the world.  The Go8 oversee the NSA, CIA, FBI, DNI, and every single intelligence unit and operation.  The Go8 are the only group with oversight on the CIA action from Presidential Finding Memos authorizing covert operations.

The back-story to CTH theory on this endeavor includes an almost complete, years-long, Dept of Justice Office Inspector General investigation that no-one was paying attention to until recently.  And don’t forget the ongoing FBI investigation into the Awan Brothers, and quantifying the potential intelligence compromise therein, plays into this.

That said, it would not be the IG carrying out the counterintelligence operation to identify leakers.  In actuality, no official IC agency would be empowered to place fake news in front of congress.  Setting traps for congress is generally bad form, and for matters of trust – bad politics.  That reality, amid those who follow DC politics, is the central point to dismiss such the “Black Hat Hunting” theory.

However, few people were paying attention four months ago when Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coates told us they were going to do exactly that:

04:30 …”The FBI has created a new counterintelligence unit to manage these [leak] cases”…

08:17 …”these National Security breaches do not just originate from within the Intelligence Community. They come from a wide range of sources within the government, including the Congress.”…

.

Two days later, Sunday August 6th, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reiterated he was going to follow through on the investigative demand of AG Sessions and DNI Coates and again referenced a “new counterintelligence division within the FBI”.

00:50 …“we’re responding appropriately. We’re going to devote more resources, re-evaluate our procedures and make sure we investigate every one of those leaks in an appropriate way.”…

1:07 “We have seen a surge in referrals (of leaks). We’ve seen an increase in the number of leaks. And we’re going to respond appropriately and try to establish an effective deterrent. Criminal prosecution isn’t the only way to prevent leaks but it’s an important part of the solution.”…

1:43 “That significant increase has necessitated an increase in resources. And so we have re-prioritized our cases within the National Security Division, we’re providing appropriate supervision at a high level, we’ve created a new unit within the FBI to focus on those leaks, and we’re going to devote whatever resources are necessary to get them under control.”…

.

If you consider the years-long IG investigation is coming to a conclusion.  And there have been several high-profile ‘mistakes’ (from the media perspective) based on leaks recently.

The leaks were real, the underlying information was false:

Additionally, overlay THIS:

Some, are beginning to catch on… Keep Watching.

_BIG UGLY_

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, FBI, media bias, NSA, Professional Idiots, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

479 Responses to The New FBI Agency Everyone Forgot – Did Adam Schiff Just Get Caught in an Elaborate Counterintelligence Sting?…

  1. Howie says:

    I nominate Andre’ Carson as leaker #2.

    Like

  2. Pam says:

    Big ugly indeed. This just gets more popcorn worthy by the day.

    Like

  3. Joe Kenney says:

    Yes, but what, if anything, will be done about this??

    Liked by 1 person

    • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

      sincere question –
      If PDJT, Sessions et al went to this much trouble to create and implement a plan to take down the mafia, which is what the swamp is…. that they would do all that to not see justice done in the end?

      Liked by 3 people

  4. Janice says:

    Sundance enlightens me again. I would be forever lost without my branch here. MAGA!

    Liked by 1 person

    • 🍺Gunny says:

      Just one thing that may have been said, but I think not.
      To get rid of the denizens of the swamp you cannot only do it from the shore or banks of the swamp. You can drain the swamp, but also you must have someone get in the swamp to see the creatures, identify, wound them, chase some out, etc.
      I believe that President Trump and some allies have people in the swamp now and we are seeing the results…Just Sayin.

      Like

  5. jat says:



    … like shootin’ fish in a barrel

    Liked by 18 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Luv those laugh-’til-you-cry Home Alone movies.

      Liked by 20 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Yesterday, WSB pointed out that Trump’s appointments are often like a great scene in The Sting, where cheaters get the tables turned on them.

      Now, in another movie-like aspect, the extent of the Communist/Democrat CONSPIRACY is coming together, like a GREAT CRIME DRAMA where the depth of the bad guys’ plot becomes fully known (OMINOUS MUSIC), as justice closes in.

      LET’S ASK OURSELVES THIS…..

      Who was the big wheel in FBI Counter-Intelligence who SHOULD have been doing something about these leaks? Why, that would have been that Trump-hating, Cankles-loving, affair-compromised STRZOK guy who just got pulled off the Mueller team! The same team which employs a LAWYER who defended one of the Hillary IT people who skated on email-gate. The same team which employs numerous leftoids and Cankleoids with all sorts of conflicts of interest, including having worked for the Clinton Foundation.

      Funny thing about that STRZOK guy who was having an affair with another FBI agent, ALSO ON THE MUELLER TEAM.

      (See here: http://heavy.com/news/2017/12/peter-strzok-lisa-page-fbi-trump-texts-affair/)

      The fake news media minimizes the situation now, but I will bet that STRZOK had other “situations” in the past that were even more compromising. Why do I say this? Because it seemed to be a pattern in my end of the swamp (what might be called a nearby lagoon) that people with such issues seemed to be selected very carefully for either management or positions of responsibility. Why? Because for TOP-DOWN CONTROL by people who themselves could not actually pass a security clearance, and who ACT in such ways – like Hillary Clinton – it is NECESSARY to enforce insecurity and compromise.

      Think of this – they were putting THE MOST COMPROMISED PEOPLE into positions of power and responsibility. And they were doing it EVERYWHERE.

      But this isn’t new to Hillary World:

      https://www.amazon.com/Unlimited-Access-Agent-Inside-Clinton/dp/0895264064

      FBI agent Gary Aldrich was appalled by what he saw in the Clinton White House.

      Leaky Comey, Casanova Strzok, Crooked Hillary, Shifty Schiff – this is all making sense.

      NOW we know why counterintelligence never did anything about the Hillary private server. FBI counterintelligence was ALREADY compromised at the TOP. And from what it seems now, almost UNIFORMLY compromised at the top. Comey, McCabe, Strzok – I’m not actually sure how deep Wray is going to have to clean!
      .
      So – the way I see it – STRZOK and SCHIFF and HILLARY and a host of others were ALL protecting each other.

      *** CONSPIRACY ***

      Liked by 31 people

  6. Gary Harding says:

    Keep on DRAINING THE SWAMP Mr. President, as no one believes the media anyway!

    Liked by 8 people

  7. Chickficshun says:

    Sundance. What do you make of Andrew McCarthy article? I posted here a few days ago on a thread that I believed they were going to make the dossier out to be factual. In order for a sting operation to be successful they would need Mueller involved, possibly flipping Comey. You have an ex FBI director sub tweeting the President of the US, its either planned because he us part of the sting or he is subverting our elected President. Then that is really bad and shows how truly our country has fallen. I still can’t see them allowing their golden boy Obama exposed. Do you really believe that is going to happen? The problem I have sometimes with PDT’s rallies, is they can signal desperate fight against winning forces. Whether this calculated to do so is my question. Before I get any concerned troll BS, understand that PDT uses his rallies for a reason. Let’s not kid ourselves, the people opposing PDT are numerous and intrenched. He is fighting almost alone here.
    Who is going to win this war?

    Liked by 2 people

  8. George says:

    President Trump named him on twitter once :
    Sleazy Adam Schiff

    Liked by 13 people

  9. deplorabledaveinsocal says:

    Now just waiting for the Schiff to hit the fan… Rev the fan up first… and use one of those high fallutin’ turbine blade fans…

    Liked by 12 people

  10. joeknuckles says:

    I think it would be sweet justice for Tucker Carlson to be granted an exclusive jailhouse interview with Adam Schiff after he is arrested.

    Liked by 14 people

  11. trapper says:

    And from time to time Pres Trump issues a head fake tweet expressing (wink wink) displeasure with Sessions so no one looks too closely at him.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. Oldskool says:

    All of that is as we have thought all along, but who is going to prosecute it? If charges are ever brought, what judge will hear it? We have the appearance of winning, but the scoreboard isn’t changing for a reason.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. joeknuckles says:

    This whole episode exposes CNN as useful idiots. At least they are good for something.

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Lucille says:

    Another excellent commentary from Stefan Molyneux…
    “Another Massive CNN Fake News Failure!”
    True News

    Liked by 6 people

  15. wheatietoo says:

    Well this is interesting.

    Liked by 10 people

  16. Madmax110 says:

    I want Schiff in Shackles.

    Liked by 15 people

    • The Boss says:

      He might like that. He’s a weird little dude, like Tim Kaine.

      Liked by 12 people

      • Christine says:

        I think it was Greg Gutfield earlier this year who said (paraphrasing) “How can you describe Adam Schiff? He has no distinguishing features. What can you say? He has…… eyes”.

        Very funny.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Daniel says:

      The news media which has been sourcing from Schiff and others should start to realize their sources are about to dry up. It therefore stands to reason that we can expect the news media to somehow reveal their sources as an “Explosive Bombshell Exclusive!” After all, they are going to be burned anyway — why not take advantage of that eventuality by profiting from it?

      Liked by 1 person

  17. CiscoKid says:

    ARMY WINS!

    Liked by 7 people

  18. md070264 says:

    Yep, gave him cover, took all the Dems off the scent….remember how the Dems went after Ken Starr?….Trump took the heat from Dems…The Dems put Mueller on the pedestal, now they are toast…. In the trading world its called ” Pump and Dump .”
    The Dems have destroyed themselves with their own hate……

    Liked by 2 people

  19. Mike says:

    I’m thinking that Trump has some excellent advisors who are patriots and ex-intelligence agency operatives.
    First term, Drain the Swamp, second term, restore the Republic?

    Liked by 9 people

  20. Publius2016 says:

    “Intent” seems to be their new excuse…funny thing is who gets to decide “intent”…obvious Extreme Media thinks they are judge and jury…Get back in line fools…Classified…Secret…Have real Time Sentences attached. Stiff would look just like Crooked in Orange!

    Liked by 3 people

  21. appadoo9 says:

    be funny if the white out of ‘1’ of 14, was evident, but in the rush to accuse it was not noticed

    Liked by 1 person

  22. freq says:

    somebody’ s gotta’ go to jail for this nonsense… I’m making a list, checking it twice…

    Liked by 4 people

  23. Sharpshorts says:

    As I recall, the the first news was about FISC Judge Contreras being “recused” from General Flynn’s case/sentencing — by whom was not noted. Currently it is reported that the Judge “recused” himself.
    My point being that IF,/b> the “official” story got changed from the Judge being recused to the Judge recusing himself then it opens a whole ‘nuther can of worms.

    i often get caught up on insignificant details or may have the time line wrong, but I thought it odd that a judge would be “recused” by someone (presumably a higher authority) without also reporting the who-and-how that decision came about.
    Certainly an AG, IG or special prosecutor would not have that power?? The FISC is under the Supremes, right?
    As I said, I may be way off the mark here.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ditch Mitch says:

      Appointed by SCJ so presumably be removed by SCJ. This was followed by a random appointment by SCJ. Which I don’t believe it was.

      Liked by 3 people

    • rf121 says:

      It was probably more a case of the conflict was brought to the judges attention and he was advised that recusing himself would be a good idea.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      Googling the matter, it appears to me that only the judge can recuse himself. If he refuses to when merited, he can be removed by a superior or the case transferred to another judge, but that is not recusal.

      I’m not a legal expert, this is just what I could absorb from a google search.

      Liked by 2 people

      • LannyD says:

        You got it right.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Thecleaner says:

          It is up to the “conflicted” party to identify the conflict and remove themselves.
          If they fail to do so, and a party to the Court proceeding brings a motion to have you removed, then testimony is taken, usually affidavit, and if you outline sufficient cause for concern that the Judge is conflicted, they will be remvoved.
          You must show strong evidence however. The Courts dont like parties to be able to “Judge shop” by making meritless conflict claims.

          Like

    • WSB says:

      My understanding is that he WAS Recused. Would mean…by someone else.

      Like

      • It’s the difference between active and passive voice – a very important point to editors of the olden times. Most of whom, BTW, who had not been to college.

        Liked by 1 person

        • JoAnn Leichliter says:

          Yes, I still remember looking at one of my mother’s high school English texts and thinking it was pretty advanced. We had grammar pounded into us for 12 years by a variety of nuns, and, believe me, they took no prisoners.

          Like

    • H. Jorgan says:

      “the the first news was about FISC Judge Contreras being “recused” from General Flynn’s case/sentencing — by whom was not noted. Currently it is reported that the Judge “recused” himself.
      My point being that IF,the “official” story got changed from the Judge being recused to the Judge recusing himself then it opens a whole ‘nuther can of worm’!
      So we have the whole illegal FCIA court being Strazoked by Peter and how many others? How can congress form a court independent of the judiciary branch of the government; SCOTUS as per the constitution Article III. It appears that the whole stinky congress of the USA need be recused for the next 50 years! START Today not next November.

      Like

      • JoAnn Leichliter says:

        My understand is that he is recused from federal court in the Flynn case (sentencing) not the FISA court. I do not know whether he is still on the FISA court.

        Like

  24. appadoo9 says:

    Fox about the only televised media not to have to retract. Wonder who the fall person will be that goes down.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. WeThePeople2016 says:

    I would not be surprised if Lt. Colonel Tony Shaffer is on the counterintelligence team for Trump. He used to be on FBN several times a week and on Fox & Friends. I have not seen him for a while now. This is his line of work and he had said on Dobbs one time that he could find the leakers in a week!

    Liked by 13 people

  26. scott467 says:

    “The email was part of the investigative evidence shared with the House Intelligence committee; and later leaked from within that committee to CNN – thereby initiating the false reporting on the content.”

    _______________

    Suppose for a moment — I know it’s awful, but — suppose for a moment that you work for CNN, and you keep getting the rug pulled out from under you by ‘leaks’ from trusted government sources which turn out to be WRONG and make CNN look stupid.

    How many times do you have to be humiliated in front of the whole planet before you begin to pause and question the veracity of the latest ‘leak’ before rushing onto the air with it?

    It’s becoming like slapstick, reminds me of the scene in “Airplane!” where all the reporters rush into the bank of phone booths at the same time, lol!

    Here’s your ‘leak’ for today, now RUN with it!

    Liked by 10 people

    • MTeresa says:

      Hahaha. Airplane. Classic.

      Liked by 3 people

    • mimbler says:

      Exactly. I have stated the same. If they were doing this in good faith, they would stop using those sources.

      Instead, they continue to use sources that are often wrong, but always critical of Trump.

      The math is pretty easy to do,

      Liked by 3 people

    • They don’t have integrity, they have an agenda.

      Fake News or not, the story goes out. Later they can walk it back but the damage is done. Their views don’t care because they all have the same agenda.
      The views don’t care about being lied to as long as the lie makes PTrump look bad.

      Thats the danger. Supporters of CNN, CBS, NBC, it doesn’t make a difference if it’s a flat out lie that brings Trump down. They are encouraging these MSM outlets to make things up, as long as they get the result they, the viewers, want.
      CNN doesn’t have to fair, honest or trustworthy.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Christine says:

      I love Airplane! (It’s called Flying High in Australia).

      Keeping with that movie, it looks like the Schiff’s going to hit the fan! (I couldn’t resist).

      Liked by 1 person

  27. Jay Heyn says:

    This could be a classic Canary Trap

    Liked by 2 people

    • pocketnuke61 says:

      YES! I wondered if anyone else would recall that term.

      “Each nugget of disinformation exposes a specific leaker. Each trail used in the sharing of that disinformation exposes the enabling media. The White Hat plants the fake news seed, and then watches to see where, when, how, to-whom, and from-whom, it shows up.”

      That is an excellent description of the “canary trap”.

      Liked by 1 person

  28. Ditch Mitch says:

    Could the “rumor” of PDJT’s own intelligence agency to bypass the “deep state” intelligence agencies be the counter intelligence unit announced by Sessions:

    04:30 …”The FBI has created a new counterintelligence unit to manage these [leak] cases”…

    And the clincher.

    08:17 …”these National Security breaches do not just originate from within the Intelligence Community. They come from a wide range of sources within the government, including the Congress.”…

    Big question now is Rosenstein. Rosenstein says he is going to follow through. Why is this?
    Has Rosey turned to a white hat. Probably not. If he did he would reign in Mueller.
    Or is Rosey looking to deflect. Probably. Exposing corruption in Congress would distract from the DOJ/FBI. At least for awhile.

    SD, more than connect the dots you have exposed and explained those dots. Great job and thanks.

    MAGA!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

      I’ve maintained that Rosenstein and Mueller are white hats hired by PDJT.
      The only ones who have said or implied that they are black hats is #fakenews chatter heads…and their parrots.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Ditch Mitch says:

        Deb, I have always said it didn’t matter if Mueller was a black or white hat as his “digging” keeps exposing more and more of the deep state corruption. Could be that Rosey is letting Mueller keep digging to continue to expose said deep state corruption.

        As of the “fake news” stating Mueller and Rosey are black hats, that could disinformation put out by PDJT’s Administration.

        …psst, Rosey is giving Mueller complete freedom to go after Trump, Mueller is sure to get him. It would keep the “impeach Trump dreamers” and fake news cheering while the deep state is being exposed and removed.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

        So far there has been no evidence to show that those two are anything but career DeepState operatives. Mueller may close down this mess soon and try to blame it all on J Edgar Comey.

        Liked by 2 people

      • singingsoul says:

        Why is it Rosenstein’s job to find leaks what happened to Session..? Has Rosenstein taken over the AG and Session is only the figure head..?
        Does anyone find this strange…?

        Like

        • TomF says:

          AG Sessions is the man giving the orders.
          Mr. Rosenstein job is to carry out those orders.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Firefly says:

          Poetic justice if black hat mueller only uncovers wrong doing by other black hats Comey, strzok, and Weissman. Wonder if Judge Contreras rejected the First fisa request or is the favorite go to guy that doj Bruce Ohr likes to get docs rubberstamped. Mueller and Weissman have prosecuted several innocent people who’d convictions were overturned with misconduct citing. See Sidney Powers’s book/ vid on Enron/merril lynch cases. The Hatfil case is another. Weimar and mueller had no remorse. Flynn new Judge Emmit Sullivan threw out Weissman case due to prosecutorial misconduct ( withholding exculpatory evidence).

          Like

    • iswhatitis says:

      Ditch Mitch says: “Could the “rumor” of PDJT’s own intelligence agency to bypass the “deep state” intelligence agencies be the counter intelligence unit announced by Sessions”

      Interesting observation.

      Could put a new light on those recent The Intercept articles that kept being pushed around the past few days.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      Or he’s not going to do anything and is just saying he will follow through. Just like Comey followed through with the thorough Hillary investigation.

      Like

  29. Bill Barker says:

    I’m glad my sister referred me to the CT. Makes the FNC look like preschool pablum. Love what I’m reading.Bill

    Liked by 23 people

  30. scott467 says:

    “However, CNN reports that two independent sources originally leaked to them the contents of what they had seen on the email in question. But CNN never saw the email, until later in the day.”

    ______________

    At what point does a ‘news’ organization stop protecting ‘sources’ who are feeding them false information?

    If I was CNN, after the second (or third, or fourth, or fifth… what are they, sadomasochists?) fake news ‘leak’, I would go public with ‘source’ and drop that hot potato right in his or her lap.

    What obligation does CNN or any other ‘news’ company have to protect the identity of a ‘source’ who is either lying or feeding false information to them?

    If I was CNN, I would go on the air, apologize for the fake news, and then in the same breath I would identify BOTH ‘independent sources’ who obviously used the company I work for to further their own agenda.

    What other recourse would a legitimate news organization have?

    And if they DON’T do that, then what’s to keep everybody else from punking CNN in perpetuity, using them like a presstitute?

    Liked by 3 people

    • WonkoTheSane says:

      They are not a legitimate news organization. They believe their own lies. Their rage at the MAGA movement has blinded them with rage. There is no amount of humiliation that will stop them. Think of them as an angry boxer in the ring. The superior fighter had already gotten in their head and they are swinging madly, wildly. PDJT keeps calmly landing blows that score. Eventually they punch themselves out, but even then they won’t admit their folly. They just lose.

      Liked by 1 person

    • JMC says:

      If CNN “outs” a source, they won’t get any more leaks. That is standard logic. That’s why Assange won’t do it no matter what.

      Like

      • IMO, protecting leakers is done to save lives. It’s an old newspaper tradition.
        But, no, the leaks will never stop. There actually are good people who have information about evil, powerful people that only the news media could identify to the public.

        Like

    • L. Gee says:

      Yes, but you sound like an honest person who does not have an agenda. CNN’s #1 priority is the NWO, and to accomplish that, they MUST take out Trump–at all costs and by all means. So anyone who runs to them with horrible news about Trump is probably going to get put in a news story. And that’s especially true for these trusted Congress-crooks whom they’ve relied on year after year. They’re hoping that if you throw enough crap at the wall, eventually something will stick and Trump will go down.

      So from this you can see that CNN isn’t concerned about viewership or integrity or money. Perhaps they’re not seeing a drop in revenue from sponsors just yet, OR maybe the sponsors (ad buyers) aren’t the ones actually funding CNN!!!

      And lastly, this makes me wonder if Trump’s overseas magic has had any influence on exactly WHO is funding the lying media!

      Like

    • neal s says:

      What makes you think that there really were two sources? Of course CNN are not a legitimate news organization. Their goal is to do anything they can do to discredit PDJT and his team. Anything that comes their way that aligns with their goal is allowed through with little ‘fact checking’ if any at all.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Gueppebarre says:

      I am having a hard time believing the “two independent sources” theme. They may have said this just to improve credibility – might just be another lie and there was only one source.

      That said, as you aptly put it, why would CNN protect a false source? Dan Rather didn’t even do that! It’s because they expect more leaking from this ‘source’ – fake or not, if it fits the narrative they will run with it and “apologize” later, when no one hears them.

      Liked by 1 person

    • CNN is getting tightly enmeshed in the PDJT matrix…… If they name the leakers, they know that no one will ever take the chance of leaking to them again–if they print the story it is going to make them look like idiots…..

      There is only one out that I see for them…… Start reporting real news.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. AmericaFirst says:

    About ten years ago I recall the Oscar Committee got upset because the copies of the movies that they sent to Judges kept getting copied and sold to the Chinese; they put some kind of digital “key” in each copy of the movies so that if anything was ever “leaked” they would know from whom.

    Liked by 4 people

  32. Jenny R. says:

    Now things heat up; now things will start to get really interesting; soon the storm will make landfall.

    Liked by 6 people

  33. The Boss says:

    Lots of parallel operations in this administration.

    1. Banking system (as thoroughly discussed here).
    2. Independent investigations (IG and SC)
    3. Counter-intel operations (Comey’s homeys vs. The Jeff and Dan Show)

    I think there are more white hats than imaginable. And black hats who have surrendered without condition. Yeah….this is getting good.

    Liked by 4 people

  34. sundance says:

    Liked by 22 people

  35. 100% YOOPER says:

    So what happens if a member of congress is found to be a leaker?

    Liked by 1 person

  36. average Joe says:

    Yes, you want the CNN happy meal ,a double nothing Burger, a large order of lies ,and a small head shake .please pull to the next window.

    Liked by 9 people

  37. cheekymeeky says:

    Flashback. There were only eight people in the room, including Schiff, when Coats testified. Somebody’s doing the leaking.

    Liked by 4 people

    • ray76 says:

      He doesn’t think it was Schiff. Ha. Sucker.

      Liked by 3 people

      • The Boss says:

        Gowdy is all set up for a righteously indignant or deeply saddened response to Schiff’s indictment and arrest for mishandling classified information.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Gueppebarre says:

        Well, perhaps he does think it could be Schiff. If this guy has an IQ over 25 then he should know that democrats do not keep their “promises” when there is an anti-Trump headline to be made. The democrats firmly believe that they are authorized to do anything to advance their boss’s “progressive” agenda – that would be Nazi-lover George.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Daniel says:

        Nah. This is very consistent with Gowdy’s M.O. He has, for example, consistently stated he doesn’t see any conflicts of interests or other reasons for recusal of Mueller and his team. He will never indict anyone in any way. He will walk right up to the line with anger and bluster and never, ever cross it. It’s the anger and bluster that draws people to him, but it’s the results which will turn away anyone with a couple of brain cells still working.

        He named Schiff and then said “I don’t think” and “I don’t believe.”

        Like

    • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

      This one won’t age well…..

      Liked by 2 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      If for no other reason (and there are many), Gowdy should take into account the above post by Wheatie which states that Schiff instigated a fundraising letter based on the Trump-Russia fake news and this is a no-no.

      Nothing is too low for Dems or for Schiff. Nothing.

      I think it is stupid for Gowdy to go to bat for Dem Schiff. Would Dem Schiff reciprocate for Rep Gowdy? I don’t think so, but if he did that alone would raise many questions as I think Gowdy’s shielding Schiff does.

      Something is rotten in Denmark…

      Liked by 6 people

      • Masterman says:

        “Would Dem Schiff reciprocate for Rep Gowdy?”

        Why not? Gowdy is priceless as a controlled opposition with credibility among the conservatives…… losing Gowdy would be terrible news for the rats in the Deep State.

        Like

    • Dixie says:

      Rat covering for rat.

      Like

    • MAGA Happy Boy says:

      Poor ol’ Trey. Bless his heart. A day late and a dollar short EVERYTIME substantive news breaks.

      As mentioned before (and forever more), Trey is the aspiring chickenhawk with the mouth of Foghorn Leghorn. Go home, Trey, yo’ momma sez it’s past yo’ bedtime.

      Like

  38. H&HC 2nd-16th says:

    Sundance is a MASTER of information accumulation and dissemination. It appears everyone (ME INCLUDED) in the CTH takes whatever little tidbit of information Sundance offers and RUNS with it. For myself, I can’t wait to learn of the next nail that can be driven into the coffins of the Anti and Never Trumpers. There is no doubt they deserve it. I am MAGA all the way. I have read and re-read the comments on this “possible” counterintelligence unit and it appears – and I repeat it only appears – we in the CTH have tried and convicted Schiff (who I despise) in our own media world. Again, I am not doubting the value of the CTH nor the patriotism of all here. I’m just wondering if we are doing what we loathe the MSM for doing. That’s all. I feel better. Now give me something else I can use against the left!

    Like

    • Proud American from Texas says:

      I’ll ask the question you appear to be alluding to:
      Sundance, is this deductive reasoning or do you have sources. Only reason I ask is, if you’re wrong, aren’t you opening yourself to liability?
      Then I tell myself, don’t be so dumb, Sundance knows what he’s doing.

      Like

  39. OKPatriot says:

    I never wish bad for anyone except Adam Schiff. I was hoping someone would accuse him of sexual harassment as he looks like a pervert, but this is even better. Hope it is true as it is a felony.
    Thank you, Sundance.

    Liked by 5 people

    • MAGA Happy Boy says:

      Adam Schitt is a cancerous pimple on the anus of our Republic. Once he is cut out, we can focus on the next growth.

      Like

    • Daniel says:

      The sex scandals of both Hollywood and of the political swamp are “open secrets.” Everyone knows it’s going on. Only insiders know the specific names and specific stories. And in national politics, it’s pretty well understood that blackmail is how the teams are formed and controlled.

      It is with this understanding that you should be viewing this massive series of scandals. It’s a weapon and it’s also COVER. People announcing they are not running for re-election and others forced into retirement? We’ve never seen so much of this all at once.

      Even boot-swap McCain voted in favor of a Trump agenda legislation and immediately after he swapped the boot onto the other foot.

      But these scandals and surprise exits from politics suggest any number of things but the ones going on now just might be “little fish” making a deal against the “big fish” which will get no deals. Just watch for a news story where Schiff ends up wearing a boot. 🙂

      Like

  40. jahealy says:

    I haven’t read the comments yet because I wanted to ask this question while it’s still fresh in my mind. Does anyone have a theory on why Wray dodged Jordan’s request to produce the FISA application?

    Liked by 1 person

  41. HMelville says:

    These CTH speculation analyses are always worth reading.
    I’m concerned that the GOP reps will soon back off these Deep State revelations like their predecessors did so many times in the past “in the interests of bipartisanship and for the good of the nation.”
    The Dems have expended far more time and effort in their fake causes against Trump than the present GOP members have spent on the genuine leaks, the politically biased and corrupted Mueller team and the recently proven political biases and questionable misdeeds of Strzok and others. For the good of the nation, I hope this article will be proven accurate. The DOJ is an essential ally in this legitimate fight and if they soft peddle or back off the game is over.
    Several GOP reps are certainly producing great sound bites and videos (Wray questioning) for Conservative outlets only (while the MSM largely ignores them) but sound bites are often mean the end of the story when the participants are only grandstanding for voters. I hope they are serious and committed in their efforts.

    Liked by 2 people

    • MAGA Happy Boy says:

      Thanks, Herman!

      I agree with your sentiments, but would humbly offer that PDJT has a solution for these miscreants. Have heart. We are about so see a new world order that restores true North and flushes these leaches into the bowels of of their forebears.

      Like

  42. Mike says:

    …and what purpose do the leakers pursue? To weaken Trump.
    Why do they want to weaken Trump? Because he flies in the face of the Soros backed DNC/EU globalist agenda.

    My hope is that Trump drains the swamp, and restores at least a modicum of the Republics strength (based on economic freedom of the citizens), and that in 2020, President Bannon can take on Soros, on a global scale, living up to Reagan’s vision of the shining city on the hill.

    Like

    • Dave says:

      I would prefer President Trump in 2020, as long as he himself still feels at that point he has the health for the job.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mike says:

        Agreed.
        Bannon 2024.

        Liked by 1 person

      • MAGA Happy Boy says:

        Expect Trump in 2020 with a new VP and an early departure so he can avoid the travails of an over-achieving two-term Presidency! 🙂

        Like

      • singingsoul says:

        Dave says:
        “I would prefer President Trump in 2020, as long as he himself still feels at that point he has the health for the job.”
        ____________________________________
        I vote for President Trump in 2020 also if his health holds and if he wants to run again and put up with this crap that he is unfairly being dished..
        I will never vote for Bannon he has not shown me anything that he is worthy being the President. He fell President Trump in the back with going counter to Trumps endorsement. He is not loyal just as Cruz is not.

        Like

    • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

      2020 “President Bannon “?….. LOL Never gonna happen!
      someone needs to get off the breitbart junk buffet ….

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mike says:

        Oops, Bannon 2024, unless you have a better idea?
        I’d vote for Sundance, too.

        Like

        • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

          sorry…. Never is NEVER

          Like

        • Deborah @UnTamedInSD says:

          But to answer your other question –

          I’d be watching who is being groomed by PDJT right this very moment to be his successor.. and I am not convinced that is Pence, but could be. I tend to think it will be someone young with the same instincts and backbone. If i could pick someone for no reason other than that…. I’d like to see Zinke
          that man has guts, strength, convictions and the right mix of Moxy & non politician common sense patriotism to be a follow up to Trump…. plus i love the hat with cattle under it.

          Liked by 1 person

  43. dizzymissl says:

    This is SO Good

    The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

    https://theintercept.com/2017/12/09/the-u-s-media-yesterday-suffered-its-most-humiliating-debacle-in-ages-now-refuses-all-transparency-over-what-happened/

    Liked by 5 people

    • georgiafl says:

      Quote:
      “Let’s just remind ourselves of how many times major media outlets have made humiliating, breathtaking errors on the Trump/Russia story …
      – Russia hacked into the U.S. electric grid to deprive Americans of heat during winter (Wash Post)
      – An anonymous group (PropOrNot) documented how major U.S. political sites are Kremlin agents (Wash Post)
      – WikiLeaks has a long, documented relationship with Putin (Guardian)
      – A secret server between Trump and a Russian bank has been discovered (Slate)
      – RT hacked C-SPAN and caused disruption in its broadcast (Fortune)
      – Crowdstrike finds Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app (Crowdstrike)
      – Russians attempted to hack elections systems in 21 states (multiple news outlets, echoing Homeland Security)
      – Links have been found between Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation (CNN)”

      There’s much more….excellent article!

      Liked by 2 people

  44. Mark Wothe says:

    I honestly believe this will be one of the most important things Trump has ever said.

    Liked by 6 people

  45. Plain Jane says:

    I’m going to admit my dumbness here and now. Even though Sundance does a spectacular job of keepeng us informed,
    I need a CHEAT SHEET.
    I Need a sheet with names, positions and their department of all the hats and a sheet listing all the a, b, c, initials along with the names of all corresponding departments.

    This could then be turned into a bingo card of sorts, and each time one of the louts is outed, I could write in what is his/her outcome or punishment. LOL

    Liked by 2 people

  46. John says:

    Anybody else getting the sense the dam is going to break soon. If Trump gets his tax cuts for XMAS next year sets up his agenda on his terms. The opposition threw in the kitchen sink this past year and is losing. The money is starting to dry up (settlements from DOJ and bank fraud just went away). I haven’t seen a BLM protest in a long time now. I think Trump turned the spigot off months ago. The marches are disappearing and getting smaller in size.

    Liked by 3 people

    • 🍺Gunny says:

      To get rid of the denizens of the swamp you cannot only do it from the shore or banks of the swamp. You can drain the swamp, but also you must have someone get in the swamp to see the creatures, identify, wound them, chase some out, etc.
      I believe that President Trump and some allies have people in the swamp now and we are seeing the results…Just Sayin.

      Liked by 1 person

  47. NC PATRIOT says:

    My guess is yes. Had to appear not too cozy with each other.

    Like

  48. 🍺Gunny says:

    That is correct. But you must understand, eventually you have to go in and get them.
    Like fighting in the city. Eventually you have to in…house to house. The most dangerous type of combat.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s