Chuck Schumer Brings “Muh Russian” Conspiracy Strategy To Gorsuch Nomination Process…

Once political Democrat leadership recognize the only controversy created by their opposition boils down to: the friend of a second-cousin of a third-grade classmate who once lived in the same city as the opposed target hearing rumors of a mattress tag being removed, well, the autonomic trigger becomes: the opposition is Mao reincarnated as the spawn of Hitler…

For today’s example the opposition is Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch.

Apparently Gorsuch has outlasted the insufferable mattress tag gauntlet. Enter Chuck Schumer to strategize the next steps.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, announces today that he cannot support Gorsuch and “urges his colleagues to vote no”; where “urging colleagues” means get in line, or else. Thus setting the stage for a filibuster, well, that would be, if all 48 Democrat Senators follow the compliance demand.

Therein lies the outline of the very tenuous Democrat strategy against Gorsuch: Force Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to use the nuclear option to pass Altar Boy Gorsuch to the Supreme Court with 51 votes instead of 60.

Obviously, if 8 Democrat Senators vote to confirm Judge Gorsuch – Schumer will have been rebuked. Those Democrats will have their offices moved to the never cleaned bathroom stall at the end of the cellar (ie. no-financial DNC support for their reelection bids).

Senator Schumer is not “technically” calling for a filibuster, that would be impolitic, audacious, undiplomatic and transparent to the national electorate. So Senator Schumer instead “urges his colleagues” to vote no. Same/Same.

However, accepting all reasonableness is now cast asunder in favor of political posturing, if his colleagues comply they run the very real risk of seeing nomination #2 (Kennedy’s  replacement), and nomination #3 (Ginsburg’s replacement), also reduced to nothing more than a 51-vote-threshold.

There are many Democrats who understand this risk quite well.

So, what does it all mean?

Quite frankly, this signal from Senator Schumer indicates the forward political strategy of the Democrat party is to transpose the “muh Russian conspiracy narrative” from President Trump onto Judge Neil Gorsuch.

The ‘very fake news’ Russian conspiracy narrative is entirely created to undermine the legitimacy of the Trump presidency. By applying the filibuster plan to Judge Gorsuch the Democrats are signaling the same intention to the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and any decision they make, against the larger progressive ideological societal constructs, therein.

Invoking the filibuster when there is no real reason to invoke the filibuster boils down to Democrats making a political decision to undermine the legitimacy of Gorsuch and the Supreme Court.

This approach establishes the typeset for the DNC donation letters, social justice notifications, and all planned 2018 and 2020 campaign objectives over the next 3+ years.

This approach also confirms the vast Russian conspiracy narrative will be carved on their commandments over the same time period, and will not be dropped in the foreseeable future.

Conduct yourselves accordingly.

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Legislation, media bias, North Africa, Occupy Type Moonbats, Predictions, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Supreme Court, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

319 Responses to Chuck Schumer Brings “Muh Russian” Conspiracy Strategy To Gorsuch Nomination Process…

  1. Howie says:

    He is feeding the minions.

    Liked by 15 people

  2. Sentient says:

    Maybe Schumer wants a filibuster so that Kennedy won’t quit SCOTUS.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Mariposa 323 says:

    Boy are they setting themselves up for their total extinction come 2018 . How sweet it is !

    Liked by 15 people

  4. Kelly says:

    The first paragraph of this post is the best political satire I’ve read in a long, long while.

    Liked by 18 people

  5. Andrew E. says:

    Frankly, I welcome the Democrats attempts to delegitimize as much of the federal government as possible. I stand with Trump, not the government.

    Liked by 11 people

    • IMO Judge Gorsuch’s reply regarding originalism was perfect. Wouldn’t we all love to know? Instead we study and speculate. What’s wrong with that?

      Liked by 9 people

    • dayallaxeded says:

      Those who decry “originalism” in constitutional law are simply shilling for the destruction of the rule of law generally. If the words of the written law have no clear, determinable meaning, then there really is no law; only might makes right. Mob rule. Funny thing about mob rule–the mewling snowflakes and even the weekend anarchists think they’re the ascendant mob when they stop traffic and beat up a few vulnerable opposition supporters, but for the most part, they’ve got no precious metal (steel, brass, lead) stores to take it to the next level. How will that work out for them, when there is no law and might makes right?

      Liked by 7 people

      • sunnydaysall says:

        That is why they make it a point to call our “Constitutional Republic” a democracy! They believe the Constitution is a living breathing document, shattering all concept of original law! They also believe that they are the majority so they can do whatever they want and the laws be damned! That is why they use that little ditty that “Hillary won the majority of the popular vote” so often (which is very doubtful) to spearhead their “democracy… Lawlessness = “Mob Rule”!

        Liked by 3 people

      • El Torito says:

        Oh they want rule of law, but based on their beliefs. They despise being held to the standards of the Founders. Socialized health and sanctuary cities are only the initial symptoms of the disease.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Trumppin says:

      This will be played over and over throughout the 2018 & 2020 elections

      Liked by 4 people

      • maiingankwe says:

        Trumppin, yes, they most certainly will and to their own detriment I’m sure.

        While I read this article, I couldn’t help but think of all the hard working, blue dog democrats. They have got to be really tired of hearing all of this bs. Rest assured, every time a dem politician runs with this, a republican will not only point out Gorsuch’s flawless record, they will yell from the highest mountain that every single one of them, plus some, like the idiot and the hag had all voted for him previously.

        It will have to stop some of the old time democrats into asking what the heck and followed by their answer the dems will do anything to stay in power and lying and creating falsehoods is one of them. There is absolutely no reason why they should push for a filibuster when they are all guilty of praising and voting him in before, which wasn’t that long ago.

        I see it as an utter fail on schumer when it comes to the patience of the democratic voters in their future. He’s taking a yuuge chance, which could very well easily backfire.

        This is only my opinion though. I do know the nasty members of the left will jump with joy over this stupidity, but there you go, they’re not exactly what anyone would call very bright. Just like Howie pointed out with his clip, a bunch of backwards, crazy feeding monkeys.

        Be well,
        Ma’iingankwe

        Liked by 3 people

      • Pam says:

        Yep. This is certainly good ammo. It’s a piece of brilliance.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Howie says:

      Originalism beats communism every time.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Shadrach says:

      I watched this part of the questioning (interrogation). Gorsuch gave really good responses to all of these idiots. Well thought out, clear in presentation, and a very good explanation of what he considers originalism. It made sense even to me, did not sound partisan in any way, and instead reflected a well thought out method for applying law.

      Logic = Partisan? Well, Progressives are illogical, so there’s that.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. All Hype says:

    Gorsuch is squeaky clean I see no reason not to use the nuclear option. Boo hoo to Chuck Shumer. He can cry all he wants. It can happen this time and the next 2 times Trump puts a new SC justice on the bench.

    Liked by 8 people

  7. skipper1961 says:

    I wish chuck schumer would swallow his own head.

    Liked by 9 people

  8. Apollo says:

    “nomination #2 (Brennan’s replacement)”

    Kennedy probably? Brennan retired in 1990 and was replaced by Souter…

    Like

  9. fleporeblog says:

    I absolutely love Chuck the clown and his band of misfits that go along with it! This is the best thing that could happen for our president and Republicans. The pressure on Mitch McConnell to use the nuclear option will be overwhelming. Everyone with half a brain realizes Gorsuch should receive 60+ votes. Mitch will go nuclear meaning that replacement # 2 this summer for Kennedy will be William Pryor (48 yrs old) from the 11th District Court.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/william_pryor_has_no_place_on_the_supreme_court.html

    Democrats and liberals will curse the day Chuck the Duck allowed the nuclear option to happen for Gorsuch. Keep in mind Pryor made the final 3. You want to talk about a hard liner in the mold of Antonin Scalia, it would be Pryor.

    They will have to freeze Old Ruth in a freezer for the next 7 years to make sure Trump doesn’t bring along another hard liner like Pryor. We will have a 6 – 3 SC for the next 40+ years!

    Liked by 12 people

    • mimbler says:

      I think this is ideal for us. Gorsuch is the poster child for a shoe-in confirmation, and if they filibuster, no-one can legitimately criticize us for using the nuclear option.

      Then…with the next nomination, we are set up to steamroll right over the dems, when they would normally have a little more leverage as we will be tilting the court right at that time,
      Mike

      Liked by 3 people

      • mimbler says:

        Sorry for the duplication, didn’t realize the Fleporeblog had already posted the essence of my comment,
        Mike

        Liked by 2 people

      • repsort says:

        So would this ONLY affect SCOTUS nominees? Or would this clear a path to repealing Obamacare with only 51 votes?!!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Mudpie says:

          Only SCOTUS nominees. The Dems used the nuclear on a district or appelate judge, so now those only require 51 votes. But Obamacare is another type of approval, so the 60-vote cloture majority still applies.

          Liked by 4 people

        • JoAnn Leichliter says:

          SCOTUS only.

          Liked by 1 person

        • mimbler says:

          Excellent question! I don’t know the answer, but I “think” it would apply just to the SCOTUS votes.

          Hopefully one of the more knowledgable will be along to answer as I’ll try to research the question, but don’t know if I’ll find an answer.
          Mike

          Liked by 1 person

        • mimbler says:

          Ok, that was easier than I thought. If the article I found was correct, the nuclear option would apply only to business sent from the executive branch, i.e. confirmations, treaties, etc. Health care will come from the House, or the legislative branch, so it would not be affected,
          Mike

          Liked by 2 people

          • mimbler says:

            Once again, I need to learn to refresh before replying as several able Treepers already answered this question!
            Mike

            Liked by 1 person

            • maiingankwe says:

              Mimbler,
              There is nothing wrong with reading how another one puts the same thought in different words. I kinda like it myself, it reinforces the idea.

              If I was to refresh before I posted, it would erase everything I had written. I don’t know if the same would work with yours.
              Be well,
              Ma’iingankwe

              Liked by 2 people

              • Doug says:

                Oh they could absolutely remove the 60 vote requirement for obamacare replacement. However, once that happens the senate will become a simple majority rules place and the decorum and ability to find compromise will be gone. But guess what the democrats will do this if they get back in power. thats how they roll

                Liked by 1 person

          • repsort says:

            Gotcha. hank you Mike.

            Liked by 1 person

        • Kroesus says:

          depends on how they amend the rule…..when our favorite uncle Harry amended it he excluded ONLY SCOTUS nominees from its affects

          Like

    • fleporeblog says:

      This is one time I don’t mind living in NY!

      Hi Senator Shumer:

      Please do everything in your power to stop the selection of Neil Gorsuch. That seat was stolen from us! I hate the idea that Trump will get the replacement that Obama should have had. Make sure those other 47 Democrat Senators do the right thing and stand united together. I have given my last penny to the DNC and I expect to be rewarded. YOU are our only hope.

      Thanks
      Felice

      Thank You for Your Email
      Thank you for contacting Senator Schumer.

      Liked by 21 people

    • dayallaxeded says:

      I worked on a case in the SCOTUS in the early 90s, right after Ginsburg got her seat on the court–from the counsel table, she looked like she would drop dead any minute then. It’s a miracle of modern medicine (and dentistry–I’ll say no more) that she’s still there. Would that she’d get on with that move to NZ she was blabbering about during the campaign.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Wend says:

        I envy you getting to argue before Scalia. Even friends who were ideological opposites said he was nice and funny and asked great questions.

        Liked by 4 people

        • dayallaxeded says:

          We didn’t appreciate it at the time, but it was a great court–Scalia was the most incisive, knowledgeable, yet conversational of the justices. Ginsburg misfired a nonsensical question right off the bat–that’s her thing–get in the first question, no matter how wack. I had contact with an assistant solicitor general who warned us about that. Rehnquist was sharp, too, though he would get up and walk around behind the drapes back of the bench to ease his bad back. Fortunately, the clerk and ASG warned us, so we didn’t think he was dis’ing us. Looking back, it was kind of an end of an era.

          Liked by 5 people

      • Your Tour Guide says:

        Dayallaxed: I read a hilarious book years ago. It was called “Senator Bob Packwood’s
        Diaries”. The author was anonymous.

        The whole joke behind it was how Packwood turned progressively into a around the bend
        absolute sex addict. The turning point in the book was when he started fantasizing about
        Ginsberg. See if you can come across the book if you can. It was screamingly funny.

        Like

      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        She doesn’t like our Constitution much, so there is not much holding her here anymore.

        Liked by 1 person

    • El Torito says:

      Alot saying Mitch won’t do it, but he’s been quoted numerous times as saying “Gorsuch will be confirmed.” I just hope it’s swift and to the back of the head.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. MakeAmericaGreat says:

    This is all they have. They can’t let it go, and they still are hoping it somehow leads to impeachment proceedings.

    Hence, Manafort and Stone and Carter Page are now supposedly the campaign/transition/presidency masterminds when the truth is only Manafort is of any relevance, and he was with the campaign for about 5 months out of a 24 months or so timetable.

    This is desperation. Everything must somehow be tied to Russia or the Russia investigation (such as Nunes’ actions yesterday). But as Spicer pointed out in today’s press briefing, this type of reporting and reaction is what one does when there is nothing concrete to work with.

    The Kabuki theater goes on, but it’s not going to go on forever. Meanwhile, we’ve got a health care bill to pass and a SOCTUS judge to be confirmed.

    The more the real stuff gets done, the less the Kabuki theater distraction stuff matters.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Kroesus says:

      Manafort was significant as Campaign chair for a little over 2 months….his primary responsibility was as a “whip” for votes at the RNC and then a transition to Kellyanne

      Liked by 1 person

      • MakeAmericaGreat says:

        Yep. Exactly. And he was let go because of the Ukraine stuff and Trump got down big. But this is all they have — Manafort, Roger Stone, Carter Page. There is nothing there, just Dems desperation.

        Liked by 1 person

        • A2 says:

          Well the desperadoes are again going after Wilburine Ross because of his Vice Chairman position at the Bank of Cyprus and a deal he oversaw with the Russians. They like a second bite of the apple.

          Liked by 1 person

  11. TC says:

    Schumer is a partisan scumbag, and has always been a partisan scumbag. Maybe one of you bright people can explain WTF Trump was thinking having Schumer speak at his Inauguration. Attempt at goodwill? You can’t change a snake.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Rudy Bowen says:

      Well, the attempt at showing amicable good will and ‘bi-partisanship’ is sure making Chuck look really bad now, isn’t it.

      Liked by 4 people

    • El Torito says:

      I think DJT wants to treat everyone well on the front side, because it’s his way of avoiding regret when he dispatches his enemies. The Dem leadership is like ISIS. We attempt to reason with them, wishing to avoid the only solution – which is extermination. With DJT everyone is afforded the opportunity to do the right thing. Scummer will get his and it will be glorious.

      Like

  12. QuestGirl says:

    Sundance, I smile, followed with a robust laugh out loud. The proverbial mattress tag brings back childhood memories, thank you.

    What they don’t seem to understand, is that this “tag” can be legally removed by the consumer.

    Liked by 5 people

  13. tax2much says:

    Dems are fond of simple majorities.

    51 votes work for me.

    Liked by 8 people

  14. redtreesquirrel says:

    Not to mention all the Ninth Circuit Court judges that will be retiring under Trump’s watch.

    Buckle up Dems. You are about to lose every gain you made through Obama’s cheating and more.

    Liked by 13 people

  15. labrat says:

    “The only proper response to outrage culture is to be outrageous,” Milo Yiannopoulos

    I still say Trump should invite Putin over to a full blown State visit or a weekend at Mar a Lago.

    Liked by 8 people

  16. Abster says:

    Surely, someone has some dirt on Chucky. Enough to shut him up at least.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Tonawanda says:

    No doubt, Gorsuch has been so well qualified and so inoffensive, if the Dems filibuster the nuke option will everywhere by everyone be seen as reasonable and justified, in which case hello Justice Pryor.

    Liked by 5 people

  18. majorstar says:

    That’s fine (Dems having “illegitimate” construct). They’re still losses. And they would use some preposterous smear against him, Trump or the GOP anyway. Don’t ever imagine that you can stem or preclude the moonbattery of the Left by placating them in some way. Like Islamic Fundamentalists, they perceive any sensitivity or collegiality as a sign that they prevailed over you and that it signals their ongoing dominance. You never win with these types. Key is not to try.

    Liked by 5 people

  19. John Galt says:

    Gorsuch is a gift that Dems should embrace with open arms. Trump could have nominated a hard core conservative such as Ted Cruz, Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown . . . .

    Liked by 4 people

  20. paulraven1 says:

    I have a certain perverse admiration for democrats — they are totally, implacably relentless with their narratives. Republicans don’t even know what a narrative is, and when they accidentally stumble on one, give it up at the first sign of media umbrage.

    Liked by 8 people

  21. Ziiggii says:

    so o’Chuckie boy couldn’t get his delay 2 days ago and now this?!?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/325063-schumer-delay-supreme-court-vote-because-of-russia-investigation

    and now a delay in the Healthcare Bill…. I think the tactic from this point forward is to basically shutdown any and all Government business.

    Liked by 3 people

  22. Just Tea says:

    As much as Schumer is in the media you might think that he would realize how utterly stupid he looks wearing his glasses like that. What’s up with that? I’ve seen Chuck Toad doing it too.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. TwoLaine says:

    So, in essence, Tit for Tat. You wouldn’t let us hold a vote on what’s his name, so we will ignore the vote on your dude, and cut off our heads in the process.

    Liked by 4 people

  24. NHVoter says:

    Chuck Schumer is a giant D bag.

    That is all.

    Liked by 3 people

  25. dissonant1 says:

    This is a fairly likely explanation. However, there was a report a couple of days ago that Schumer wanted to “negotiate” with the Republicans by giving them Gorsuch if they promised not to go nuclear on any of the succeeding Trump nominations. Only the Republicans would do something as stupid as that; but maybe, just maybe, this is Chuck ratcheting up the “pressure” on them to do so? I can hear it now: “Oh, Please, Chuck! Call off your dogs! I’ll do whatever you want.” – Your Friend, Mitch

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Joe says:

    Very easy to see.

    Just head to sites like Mediate or TheHill.

    Soros monkeys have descended, end masse, furthering this narrative.

    The “repeat the big lie often enough…” is their tactic right now and it is blatant.

    Liked by 4 people

  27. john lorenz says:

    F the Demshevicks. Do what is needed to be done on every single issue. Let them not derail the plans to bring us back from their utopian authoritarian paradise they tried to impose.

    Liked by 2 people

  28. StrandedinCA says:

    This should be such a victory for our side. Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch with probably two more justices to be named in a short period of time. Why do I have the sneaky suspicion that the establishment (McConnell, et al) will screw this up???

    Liked by 2 people

    • Trumpy33 says:

      There are several Democratic senators who will vote for Cloture, but will not vote for Gorsuch. How many? not sure. Schumer is threatening filibuster, to try to get some concessions out of McConnell for future nominees.

      Like

    • repsort says:

      well, cuz most of us here have battered conservative syndrome… Every time we’ve gotten our hopes up in the past, we’ve been bent over and screwed… I honestly hate R’s as much as I hate the D’s.. Uniparty, all.

      Liked by 2 people

    • popsfromvienna says:

      You can absolutely count on it.

      Like

    • HammerDog says:

      “Why do I have the sneaky suspicion that the establishment (McConnell, et al) will screw this up???”

      Because you’ve been paying attention. McConnelll is a GOPe globalist to the core and can’t be trusted to not screw this up. Ditto for The Captured One and Graham.

      Liked by 2 people

  29. Craig W. Gordon says:

    Deny ‘Alterboy’ a seat? Funny stuff right there! Hahaha.

    Like

  30. bayrat65 says:

    When is scumer up for relection?

    Like

  31. Founding Fathers Fan says:

    All this talk about ‘Russian this’ and ‘Russian that’, I went out and bought Russian salad dressing.

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Judy K. Warner says:

    Why would Schumer pick a fight over what might be the only thing Republicans are united about? I thought he was smart. This will just unite them more and give them more fighting spirit. A victory over an implacable enemy — great motivator for more victories.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thorfinnr says:

      Schumer is living in fear daily that his dirt is finally going to catch up to him. Getting Trump impeached over this Russia nonsense and/or holding him up from getting anything done is the only hope he and his swamp dwellers have.

      Liked by 2 people

  33. Nunya Bidness says:

    However, a “delegitimized” Gorsuch still has 1 vote on the SCOTUS. They can squeak and kick all they want .

    Like

  34. Lburg says:

    Right after the NYPD releases what they have on Weiner’s computer.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. John Brink says:

    So Democrats are hoping to knock of 2 republican Senators-then what?

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Minnie says:

    So, Schemer, you voted Judge Gorsuch to the Federal bench in 2006 – what’s changed, Chuckie?

    As you look down your nose at us, what has changed?

    Sorry to say this POS represents my State.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Minnie says:

    Next rally call – TERM LIMITS!!

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Minnie says:

    As for “moving up the ladder”, perhaps a rung or two need removal. Life-long politicians are destroying this Country. The game of “whose pocket are you in today” is breathtaking.

    “Before his election to the Senate, Schumer served in the House of Representatives from 1981 to 1999, representing New York’s 16th congressional district, later redistricted to the 10th congressional district in 1983 and to the 9th congressional district in 1993. A native of Brooklyn and graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, he was a three-term member of the New York State Assembly, serving from 1975 to 1980.”

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Niagara Frontier says:

    I was almost certain that the Democrat senators from the states Trump won bigly would have had sufficient pressure put on them from the folks back home that we wouldn’t even be talking about a nuclear option with this nominee.

    Perhaps there hasn’t been sufficient pot stirring back in the relevant states? I remember for some Dem nominees in the past, their party and PACS were in full campaign mode, including national ad buys. What happened here? Has that occurred anywhere?

    Like

  40. freepetta says:

    I am embarrassed to admit that jerk Schumer is one of my senators. The people of NY state are held hostage by the liberal slime of NYC.

    Liked by 2 people

  41. Ip Siscr says:

    The Democrats = the STASI of the old DDR. You will think as we tell you !!! You will be ideologically pure !!!

    Like

  42. itswoot says:

    Schtumor is a cancer on the arse of the U.S. body politic.

    Like

  43. joninmd22 says:

    It’s a bizarro upside down world.

    Lindsey Graham will support the nuclear option to support Pres. Trumps agenda.

    The “conservative” Freedom Caucus, Not so much.

    Like

  44. Ghostrider says:

    My first reaction to Schumer and his statement was he is introducing more confusion and chaos. Yesterday, it was widely reported that the Democrats were looking for a deal in exchange for their votes on Gorsuch. What changed overnight? Why is Schumer acting so confident? Does he believe or does know that Mitch won’t use the nuclear option? Doesn’t have the guts to use the nuclear option? Or, is he betting that the use of the nuclear option will embolden Dems with the fodder they need going into 2018? Schumer is bluffing.

    Liked by 1 person

  45. Dale says:

    Question: do the Republicans have 51 votes to kill the filibuster for the Supreme Court? Will McCain and the other GOPe vote to kill the filibuster? I am not at all sure that they will.

    Like

  46. Methinks this is just a political ploy by Schumer to mollify the radical base of his party. Watch in the end that they find eight very liberal Democrats from states where they wouldn’t stand a chance of being primaried to vote to confirm, arguing that they wish to keep the filibuster intact. The Dems know Gorsuch is not the hill to die on politically, it will be when the next vacancy opens up on the court.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Bill lee says:

    Maybe they should remind Schumer that he help a pedophile get in the country he may end up on the end of a warrant him self soon,they have nothing left their gonna do whatever they can to push the blame as long as they can on the President.I hope he gets two more picks that we piss the democrats off Gorsuch well be Supreme Court justice.

    Liked by 1 person

    • John Galt says:

      “Maybe they should remind Schumer that he help a pedophile get in the country”

      He’d probably get a libtard medal for that.

      Like

  48. Howie says:

    The Russia strategy depends upon Comey, the Obama Homey. For the scheme to work Comey, The Homey, has to keep the ongoing investigation fires burning. If Homey fails, the whole scheme fails.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s