From October 2013 forward we have discussed the presidential election of 2016 and foretold/warned what was to come. There are trillions of dollars at stake.
The culmination of four years strategic planning (2011 – 2015) from Wall Street -via legislative priorities- are enmeshed within the outcome. The financiers have spent hundreds of millions on the construction.
Anyone with even moderate research skills could assemble the same data if they had: a.) time, and b.) inclination. Sometimes, like the “splitter strategy“, conspiracies are not theory. The behavior inherent within the visible activity is simply just an outcome of a mutually beneficial plan.
There are trillions of dollars at stake. The financial (Wall Street) bets on the international global trade and finance sectors are in the tens of trillions. More modestly, the downstream beneficiaries within the campaign consulting industry itself are worth more than several billion per election cycle.
Candidate Donald Trump is a risk to all of these enterprises – All.Of.Them.
With that in mind everyone must ask themselves what would those interests, who ultimately control all of these outcomes, do to retain power? When there are trillions at stake, how much would they spend to retain control?
Think about it.
I don’t mean just casually consider it; I mean actually reset your mind and think about what would an enterprise do to retain control over even one trillion dollars.
Think about the math.
Contemplate the size and scope.
Two billion seconds ago it was still 1959. How big is a trillion? (a thousand billions).
How big is the derivatives market? Derivatives are paper bets on global assets, trade, economic outcomes, etc.
How big are those ‘paper’ bets? $800 trillion? $1.4 quadrillion? No-one really knows.
♦ Example #1 – Last night a report from the Daily Mail outlined a scandalous claim, a lawsuit. Only there’s a problem. The person (claimant) doesn’t exist. The lawsuit was self-filed. No attorney was used, referenced or mentioned. The entity filing it listed an abandoned address. The accompanying telephone number is non existent. No-one, including the FBI who hold custody of all associated records, has ever heard of this person or anyone outlined in the aforementioned article. This article updates today with a litany of corrections, qualifiers, and walk-backs. The re-write doesn’t even bear the slightest resemblance to the original construct. It disappears and reappears – loin cloth.
So how does this happen? No, not how does the lawsuit appear, that’s easy – anyone can walk into any courthouse and file a civil lawsuit. No, how does a mainstream media publication end up putting themselves so far out on ungrounded and completely fabricated construct?
Think.
♦ Example #2 – Today a polling company no-one has ever heard of produces a poll showing the Indiana presidential race is exactly opposite of every single ground report and media story in the past five days. The polled data presented runs 180 exactly opposite of every voice who is reporting on the ground in Indiana. The assembled outcome is exactly opposite to the evidence you can see with your own eyes.
Yet this obscure poll, by an unknown outlet is pushed by one, only one, very specific media outlet?
Poll: @tedcruz leads in Indiana with 45%. #SpecialReport pic.twitter.com/alsdMt3dPX
— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 29, 2016
So how does this happen? No, not how does the poll appear, that’s easy – anyone can sit at a computer and type up a set of manufactured responses to questions and then sell it as research poll data. No, how does a mainstream media corporation end up putting themselves so far out on ungrounded and completely fabricated construct?
Think.
♦ Example #3 – Fox News Pundit George Will writes an op-ed tonight in the Washington Post, stating if Donald Trump wins the Republican Presidential nomination all efforts should be made to support Hillary Clinton in the general election.
“If Trump is nominated, the GOP must keep him out of the White House”… (link)
How does this happen? What/whose interests are served?
Think.
Take your intellectual honesty to it’s ultimate Occam’s Razor conclusion and you’ll see all three examples have the exact same beneficiaries.
Sometimes conspiracies are not just theory.
When you are reading any explosive article or watching any development being produced via the corporate media,…. just think. There’s way more going on here than most people can even begin to contemplate.
