Bumper Sticker Of The Day…

From cartoonist A.F. Branco at ComicallyIncorrect.com.

Advertisements

About Patriot Dreamer

“When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed.” ~Ayn Rand *************************************************** In the battle between good intentions vs. unintended consequences….UC always win. ~Sharon
This entry was posted in Bumper Stickers. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Bumper Sticker Of The Day…

  1. barton2016 says:

    It would be funnier if he wasn’t murdered. Alone in a remote TX hotel owned by an Obama donor. With the death reported by a US Marshal Obama personally appointed. If Scalia was a left winger there would be wall-to-wall coverage.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. auscitizenmom says:

    Exactly!

    Like

  3. flyanddive says:

    This is about validity of the Obama Presidency, he needs to get an ally on the court, even if said judge is conservative. This is why I expect he will nominate a conservative or moderate leaning judge that the Senate will easily confirmed. It was rumored that Scalia was working to oppose Obama after his Presidency.

    Like

  4. TheFenian says:

    Sruggling with this cartoon …

    Sadly, the more I look at the known circumstances, I am moving more and more to the idea that this was a suicide. It’s his family’s actions that are leading me this way.

    Like

  5. czarowniczy says:

    Amendments 1 and 2 aren’t the only ones he’d be guttin’, that 4th and 10th ain’t alookin’ too good either.
    There’s also the issue of EEO which, after decades of stealing employment from the educated, competent and skilled and handing it out based on totally unrelated factors STILL hasn’t remedied the ills it was supposed o. In addition it has created a hole new field of problems – it’s future is in the SCOTUS.
    He defiantly wants guns out of the hands of the law biding and conservatives who feel they have a God and Constitutional-given right to protect themselves and their families from the savage trash that roams the streets and the mindless profs are importing. Best way to turn Americans into enslaved subjects is to prevent them from responding to the crowds Obama’s Grammy tweet went out to.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Level One Kenobi says:

    A free nation would not hinge on the fate of nine high priests.

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      The US Supreme Court has been working to rewrite the US Constitution since FDR threatened to pack the court.

      They used the Commerce Clause to stomp all over states rights. The rights of a business person to do business with whom he chose. The rights of a farmer to grow food for his own use.

      They twisted the right to a jury trial so now you have the right to a hearing before a tribunal within the department that accused you of violating an unreadable regulation.
      “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved….” ~ Amendment VII

      Pretty darn clear isn’t it? But the Supreme Court didn’t think so.

      “…The Supreme Court has, however, arrived at a more limited interpretation. It applies the amendment’s guarantee to the kinds of cases that “existed under the English common law when the amendment was adopted,”…

      In contrast to the near-universal support for the civil jury trial in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, modern jurists consider civil jury trial neither “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” Palko v. State of Connecticut (1937), nor “fundamental to the American scheme of justice,” Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)…”
      http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/amendments/7/essays/159/right-to-jury-in-civil-cases

      Supreme Court decision bolsters federal regulators’ power to interpret and change regulations — without formal notice

      Liked by 2 people

    • Patriot Dreamer says:

      Five.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s