“Black Lives Matter” Grievance Activists Take Over Hillary Clinton Rally – “FOR 30 MINUTES”….

Ten to twelve Black Lives Matter protestors took over a Hillary Clinton rally today for almost 30 minutes as event organizers, DNC operatives, and Team Hillary struggled to figure out what to do.

CNN reporter Suzanne Malveaux is traveling with Team Clinton and gives a report of what took place. 

Hillary Clinton BLM protest

According to Malveaux the chanting and protest disruption lasted for almost 30 minutes. Event organizers stood aghast “not knowing what to do”.  At one point the protesters were invited on stage, but they would not stop chanting or causing disruption.

However, in typical water-carrying and defend Hillary mode Suzanne Malveaux finished her report by sayingit was an extraordinary display or tolerance“.

This entry was posted in BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Clinton(s), Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Racism, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

164 Responses to “Black Lives Matter” Grievance Activists Take Over Hillary Clinton Rally – “FOR 30 MINUTES”….

  1. beaujest says:

    A video caused this outbreak of civil disobedience !

    Liked by 18 people

  2. hocuspocus13 says:

    Where’s Hill’s

    Body Guards
    Security
    Secret Service

    Liked by 4 people

    • PatriotUSA says:

      They were probably acting on orders from the DOJ and the horrible Loretta Lynch. Just a guess or waiting for obamanazi to wake up from his nappy time.

      They should have been hustled off stage and tossed into jail. Think of all the votes that would garner!

      Liked by 1 person

    • dondeg says:

      Can you say setup. They have to do something to compete with Trump. Too bad this sucked.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Anubis says:

      Eric Holder had to tell them not to get caught picking up Hookers. Obviously not getting caught involves sneaking out on Grandma Cankles. Enough SS have come out about how bad it is to work for her I don’t think any of them would take a wine cork for her much less a bullet

      Liked by 3 people

    • Christine says:

      It was all staged. Nothing in a Hillary event is not staged.

      Liked by 1 person

    • facebkwallflower says:

      These were not your typical BLM thugs; more like the “elite” branch. They were invited. They were too “finished” to be of the Ferguson variety; maybe even on payroll. This was not a protest but a choreographed cheer leading squad designed to get audience participation.

      Liked by 3 people

    • nimrodman says:

      hocus-pocus asked: “Where’s Hill’s Body Guards, Security, Secret Service?”

      Oh, I can guarantee you they were told to “stand down.”

      Can you imagine the “unfavorable optics” of a liberal candidate having a favored faction of liberal pets thrown out on their tookuses?

      What did Dana Carvey used to say? “Not gonna do it …”

      Liked by 2 people

  3. PatriotKate says:

    Mr. Trump will surely have something to say/tweet about this!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. emet says:

    Hillary:”Wait! wait! Hey guys! I’m not Bernie! I thought we were buddies. I hate law enforcement just like you! Look, the Man us trying to lock me up over some damn emails, just ’cause I’m a woman! Wait! Hey! We’re in ghis together. “

    Liked by 6 people

  5. So, thirty minutes of disruption, but no message delivered, no demands, nothing? What’s the point of that?

    Liked by 2 people

  6. woohoowee says:

    LOL! Look at the venue…

    Atlanta (CNN)—Black Lives Matter protesters interrupted Hillary Clinton on Friday while she was speaking at a historically black university here.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/politics/hillary-clinton-black-lives-matter/

    Like

  7. JunieG says:

    Good. If the Dems are going to allow BMA activists to hijack their events – go ahead. It reveals them as weak and silly and manipulative as they are. Anyone who yields their stage to protestors is out of control.

    Liked by 10 people

  8. Sharon says:

    That’s not a display of tolerance but of dis-ease and disorder.

    Where’s her security? This kind of shocking event (per the paid news talker) can happen quite easily, first of all, and then no one seems to be able to end it.

    And she stands there grinning and assuring them that she agrees with them. She’s just goofy. Power-hungry, indeed. But basically goofy and, I think like Jeb, thought it would be a cakewalk.

    Liked by 9 people

  9. NHVoter says:

    I would love to see these fools try this at a Trump rally.

    Liked by 10 people

    • dondeg says:

      It certainly wouldn’t happen.

      Like

    • sundance says:

      Given the way CNN sells the story as an “extraordinary display of tolerance”, you can be guaranteed BLM is currently working to do the same at a Trump rally so the narrative can be sold as “an extraordinary display of intolerance”.

      Guaranteed.

      G.U.A.R.A.N.T.E.E.D.!

      These orchestrated events do not happen in a vacuum.

      Liked by 17 people

    • lindenleelady says:

      He would immediately “Ramos” them, I am sure.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bleep21k says:

      Speaking frankly – IF Trump spends even ONE second considering or ruminating ANY demand or disruption from #blacklivesmatter at one of his rallies, I will be sorely disappointed with his campaign, with this whole process and country, and declare each and every WHITE person in this country “coward”! Enough! Enough!!

      I live in a “black” community – I work with black and WHITE people all day. This “racial divide” and these “demonstrations” (riots) and “protest” by the likes of the BGI and illegal immigrants and illegal aliens and the “representation” that come from BOTH parties MUST be eliminated! How do WE (tcth) do this?! HOW?

      And yes I know “my place” – in my home that I worked hard to buy, in America!

      Liked by 13 people

      • dick johnson says:

        well said,

        Like

      • JunieG says:

        I don’t care WHO they are. No candidate I would have confidence in would surrender their stage to activists, even if they are “on their side.” The candidate, and his staff, must be in control. If note, it bodes poorly for their performance as a leader, or, for that matter, someone that those activists can trust.

        So far, reaction to BLM activists has been pathetic.

        Controlling the emotion of a crowd is possible. Robert Kennedy was put into a position where he had to announce the murder of Martin Luther King at a presidential rally in Indianapolis, in front of a largely black crowd. He spoke earnestly and with true empathy from his heart and appeased them – Indianapolis was one of the cities that did not burn that night.

        Not Hillary or Bernie or the rest of them know how to deal with BLM disrupters. They are cowards, or manipulators, who yield their stage to them. There is no respect to be gained in this reaction. Bernie at least had the sense to hang his head in shame and depart the event, whereas Hillary will stand there grinning like a goon for 30 minutes…. Appeasing the disrupters might appeal to a tiny percent of potential voters, but it sure is turning the rest of America off in a #YUGE way, as protests did in Nixon’s time.

        Lose the election because of BLM activists – that’s fine with me. I am an All Lives Matter kinda gal.

        Liked by 1 person

      • hebejg says:

        Mr. Bleep21k,
        i have a “place” for you at my house.
        in my nice comfy man-cave. c’mon over and drink a beer with me anytime you wanna.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        Right on Mr. Bleep!

        Like

      • Mr. Haney Pixley Penciltucky says:

        You need to put your faith in the person you chose as your guy/gal. Mine is Trump all the way to the White House. Also, wouldn’t hurt to donate to his campaign. I do every month. Not much but over the entire campaign it will add up.

        Like

    • Goodoldboy66 says:

      They will ramp this crap up at trump (not carson) trust me.

      Liked by 2 people

    • hebejg says:

      i imagine they will try it soon.
      it will provide the attending Trumpsters a chance to drown them out with their own chants.

      Like

  10. Call in Bernard..He’ll know what to do!

    Like

  11. Notmeagain says:

    What’s the downside of 30 minutes less of Hillary blather? More, please.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. killdozer says:

    Truth be told, Waco represented the single greatest federally orchestrated one-day slaughter of racial minorities on American soil since Wounded Knee in 1890, and there, at least, the Indians fought back, killing more than 30 American cavalry. And no, this is not something I read on the Internet. I found a verifiable list of the dead, broken out by age and ethnicity, and counted them.

    The FBI had given the Branch Davidians video cameras. The Clinton White House knew who was in the buildings. So, almost assuredly, did the major media, but those video images were successfully suppressed, and the public never knew.

    Although usually hypersensitive to the concerns of racial minorities, the media turned a strategically blind eye to their very presence at Waco, not to mention their deaths. As intended, scarcely a black person in America knew the hell visited on his brethren by white police in those early uncertain months of the Clinton era.

    That knowledge would surely have strained black affection for the Clintons and maybe even party loyalty. The media were not about to encourage such a schism. Those under 30 may wonder how the media succeeded in keeping this information from the American people. The reason is simple: in 1993, a nearly monolithic broadcast media controlled close to all visual imagery.

    Fox News did not come online until 1996. The Internet was still in its embryonic stages. There was no Google, no YouTube, no Facebook. Even well informed conservatives were clueless about who died at Waco.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Hetter SteelStroke says:

    The Black Looting Monkey’s would not dare to do this to Trump. They know he and his security detail are packing!

    Liked by 3 people

    • lovemyAmerica says:

      EXACTLY!!!! Mr. Trump has stated he is packing…wonder why he said that? just asking.
      My low life neighbors ALL know I am locked and loaded…..don’t even think about it!

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Concerned says:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  15. bullnuke says:

    Just Occupy Wall Street with a more melanin. Libs are going to be libs. No surprises here.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Concerned says:

    This will enable them further. Expect future disruptions. What about the next Dem debate? Now that would be REALLY funny.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. jeanmarc8 says:

    I hope they are enjoying their perceived influence now. Regardless of who wins the election in November 2016, the White House will be less sympathetic to “Black Lives Matter”. A Republican president will not match Obama’s interest, and Hillary will not be able to control the crowd response, and cannot risk the adverse outcomes.

    Like

  18. tz says:

    The worst part is I’m going to have to do a deep particular examine as to whether justice and schadenfreude are compatible. Karma karma karma chameleon turns black.

    Like

    • rjcylon says:

      That’s how I feel. I would enjoy Hillary’s entire campaign being like this, but I also don’t wan this to be the new normal. They are paid to do a job though, protesting at rallies. They have to eat like everyone else.

      Like

  19. David In TN says:

    What ever happened to what the famous author Theodore H. White called the Great Democratic Party of the United States?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. They deserve each other.

    More like an extraordinary display of passivity, weakness, and hollowness.

    Like

  21. Michael Dixon says:

    It’s appropriate that the BLM gang would interrupt the white woman’s speech. The demonstrators represent the so-called democratic party quite well, a party of special interest factions each clamoring for special recognition, special privilege and special treatment. It’s all about what they want for themselves, with never a thought about what would be best for the country at large.

    The BLM people are almost childlike in their behavior. They cause a disturbance to gain attention to themselves and get what they want, not all that different from a screaming, demanding child. And they will get it if a socialist is elected president. Hillary, Bernie … what difference would it make? The revolution of fundamental transformation would continue unabated. The Republican Party as a viable entity would fade into history. Conservatives would be classified as domestic terrorists.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. MfM says:

    You can tell when there are protests at a Trump rally. The protesters are surrounded and people start chanting USA or TRUMP. Then the security comes in and takes them away. Trump rallies have enormous numbers of people who support Trump not an audience who would be sympathetic to the message of protesters. While it may happen at a Trump rally, I’m sure their security has drilled for it.

    Liked by 7 people

  23. three by one says:

    A BLM interruption would actually improve a Jeb! speech

    Like

  24. Fred says:

    Swillery’s security had to know about the “interruption”. It would not have happened otherwise. Just think of how long a demonstration by Right to Life protesters would have lasted.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Hillary stepped in quicksand AND SHE CAN’T GET OUT! Sinking slowly is her only hope! She is headed for DISGRACE! She really thinks she can win without the 93% black vote that Obama got?
    Not on her life, she has nothing that would attract the black voters. LOL! Whadda loser! And she starts chanting with her own protesters. Probably she will do this with Islamic terrorists too! I don’t even take that woman serious anymore. She hopped in the bed with the devil and you KNOW what he wants now! Then it’s kicked to the curb!

    Liked by 4 people

  26. Nanny G says:

    Maybe should should have emailed Sidney Blumenthal.
    He helped her set up back channel communications between our gov’t (her and Obama) and insurgents (ISIS, Boko Haram, al Qaeda, the Taliban).
    “We are trying to replicate what we did in Northern Ireland by setting up secret channels between insurgents and governments and then, where appropriate, developing these into negotiations…..” Jonathan Powell of Inter Mediate.

    Clinton forwarded Blumenthal’s email to two of her aides writing, “I’d like to see Powell when he’s in the Building.”
    http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/30/sid-blumenthal-emailed-hillary-about-setting-up-secret-channels-between-insurgents-and-governments/

    Liked by 2 people

  27. lastConservinIllinois? says:

    Might this be a distraction to take attention away from the Blumenthal e-mails we found out about in todays Friday data dump?

    Like

  28. Doodahdaze says:

    The GOP capitulated and pooped in their pants. That is why they walk funny. Obama should have been impeached. But no. Instead they give him 80 billion in go away money. That is what this budget deal was, make no mistake. They just suck.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Cyrus Vance says:

    Black Lives Matter.
    Over 300 thousand dollars paid to dead Affordable Care Enrollees in NY.
    Dead Lives Matter.
    2008 and 2013 Election results.
    Dead Lives Really Matter!
    Benghai? Exception that proves the rule

    Liked by 1 person

  30. rjcylon says:

    I have mixed feelings about this, for obvious reasons.

    Like

  31. Sandra says:

    I just realized one of the things I like so much about Trump is that he’s never saying anything specifically about any groups, with the single exception of his “women’s health” thing which I personally wish he’d drop because men and women both have unique health issues and I don’t think we should be focusing on women but ignoring men. I think focusing on and tailoring statements to particular groups actually increases animosity. I don’t want to hear about Marco’s parents, i don’t want to hear about Carly’s female problems, I don’t want to hear Jeb speaking Spanish, I don’t want to see Carson speaking at a Sharpton rally. And I certainly don’t want to hear any of them talk about BLM.

    Liked by 2 people

    • phil fan says:

      Politics of division vs inclusiveness of the Donald. One good reason he is The Great Unifier and his message has such wide appeal = does not pander to special interests.

      Liked by 2 people

  32. BillDes says:

    If it is Trump vs Clinton, which all signs are pointing too……the Black Lives Matter group is Trump’s best hope. The more Black Lives Matters support riots, spread hate, demand police officers lynched, the more the Democrats will lose votes.

    You’re damn right the Dems have no clue how to handle the BLM crowd. They are hoping they just go away. They are 100% behind appeasement to keep them frothing at the mouth in the corner out of the public eye. Republicans should challenge the BLM with everything we’ve got. The more the BLM crowd is challenged the more enraged they become. That is what we want.

    You can’t appease the angry and insane. They will only demand more.

    Like

    • phil fan says:

      So why is Hillary so supportive of them? To draw a contrast with that ‘intolerant’ GOP guy? BLM are a creation of the “communist left” and will not cause the Dems to lose votes, in their opinion. Just another wedge tactic from the party of division who hope we are dumb enough to walk into this trap. You are right it’s nuts but we need to be wise and not over-react to this ploy.

      Like

      • Concerned says:

        Also to contrast with “old fuddy duddy” GOP guy. She needs the youth vote even more than the black vote. It is nuts. Totally superficial and dishonest. She doesn’t REALLY want to hang out with the BLM idiots. She doesn’t REALLY support their cause. How many blacks live in Chappaqua? 1.9%. The town had a population of 1436 in 2010, 1.9% is a pittance, like 27 or 28. She and Bill picked one of the whitest towns in the US to live in.

        Liked by 1 person

  33. facebkwallflower says:

    My vision is for this to happen at Trump rally and he pull out from under the podium a Hillary wig and a blue necklace she has on in the video and imitate her for a minute or so. Then he takes off the wig and necklace and says as only Trump can, “You were not invited. You are not on the venue for entertainment. You are welcome to stay if you sit down right where you are and Shut up! Otherwise, Goodbye. By the way, ALL lives matter including BLUE. ” When they don’t leave, “Remove them and let’s get on with this rally!”

    Liked by 3 people

  34. tellthetruth2016 says:

    I would LOVE to see them do this to Oblather……..But sadly, He is behind them so I know that won’t happen But I do a agree with Sundance that its G.U.A.R.A.N.T.E.E.D going to be tried at one of Donalds rallys…….They are going to try to bait his security…….

    Liked by 2 people

  35. R Daneel says:

    Nope. Kabuki. So Shrillery can show how ‘with it’ she is. Planned to the hilt.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Plain Jane says:

      I was just scrolling through to see if anyone else thought what I was going to post. You beat me to it R Daneel.
      I think her campaign hired BLM to do it. Shrillary sure wouldn’t want Bernie to one up her. She wants notice however she can get it.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. jackmcg says:

    Guys, there is no way this was planned. Just look at her reaction. She doesn’t know what to do. If it was planned, it was a terrible decision because this makes her look awful and like she can’t control a room.

    No, not a plan. Just an example of the left eating itself.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. nimrodman says:

    I favor this crowd-control tactic:

    Liked by 2 people

  38. Mr.Right says:

    This movement is counter productive, and they know it.

    And so far, every single BLM martyr fall into the category of being “Black Trash”

    Remember the accepted definition of “White trash” by the media & hollywood:
    “…dangerous because they may be criminal, unpredictable, and without respect for authority”

    Instead the BLM need to face inward, and look at the ‘African American” culture and in particular the life choices of young black men.

    But they will never do that because it would mean taking responsibilities for their actions and outcomes, and ultimately having to give up their backward culture they seem to love so much.

    BTW, tell all those white families that are homeless or have their kids being malnourished about their white privilege… More white people live in poverty then black, I guess their “White privilege” cards got lost in the mail.

    Like

  39. hebejg says:

    chickens coming home to roost.

    Like

  40. jello333 says:

    From a few weeks ago:

    Real-estate mogul Donald Trump made it clear in a Tuesday interview that he was no fan of the Black Lives Matter movement.

    “I think they’re trouble. I think they’re looking for trouble,” the Republican presidential candidate said during a Fox News interview with Bill O’Reilly….

    “I looked at a couple of the people that were interviewed from the group,” he said. “I saw them with hate coming down the street last week talking about cops and police, and what should be done to them. And that was not good. And I think it’s a disgrace that they’re getting away with it.”….

    “I think it’s disgraceful the way they’re being catered to by the Democrats,” Trump told O’Reilly. “And it’s going to end up kicking them you-know-where. I don’t think it’s going to end up good. The fact is all lives matter. That includes black and it includes white and it includes everybody else.”

    He added: “And we have people, Democrats, that are afraid to even say that. They’re apologizing because they say ‘white lives matter’ and ‘all lives matter.’ These are people that are unfit to run for office in my opinion.”

    http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-black-lives-matter-2015-9

    Liked by 4 people

  41. myopiafree says:

    I would like to see this on MSNBC. Yes – these are Obama’s children. They are Hillary’s children. They are about “taking over” the government by force of the “mob”. This is what Hitler started and did. He had the SA and SS to protect him. Then he dis-armed the public. Then there was no hope of stopping Hitler. This is the “path” that the dems have chosen. It is not pleasant to contemplate this “rule by mob”.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. Southern Son says:

    Am I the only one that noticed their mascot. Black Panthers! Louis Farahcon was probably there too. They are calling us out, y’all. Molon Labe.

    Like

  43. talkaftercarefulthought says:

    the democrat party.. “the inmates running the asylum”

    Like

  44. keebler AC says:

    The liberal and oh-so-non-racist rag actually suggested that Hillary was being extraordinarily tolerant of the black protestors. OK, LOL.

    Don’t forget this,

    “I Ain’t Nowheres Tired, I Came Too Far From Where I Started From. Nobody, Told Me That The Road Would Be Easy, But I Don’t Belive He Brought Me This Far To Leave me” — Hillary Clinton, Selma, 2007 DNC primary against Obama

    As Dr. Forest Lewis (black conservative) says,

    To make matters worse, this “Yankee” used a faked–atrocious southern accent. As a son of the south, I saw red. Face it, a lot of northerners look at those of us from the south as being stupid, someone who just fell off the proverbial “haywagon.” Then, you have this panderer invading the south making fun of the way that we speak. All true southerners should be outraged at this carpetbagger. The woman simply has no shame. Not one single ounce of shame in her bloated body!!!

    As an African-American, I am especially infuriated at Hillary Clinton performing a parody on the late Reverend James Cleveland’s famous song. This song was a rallying cry for many of us in the Black Church in the 1960’s. It gave us strength and hope. And this bimbo comes along–not understanding the true meaning of this Black Spiritual–and makes a mockery out of it. What a complete buffoon. But, what about the Black audience who hailed Queen Hillary’s rendention of the Reverend James Cleveland’s song? Suffice it to say, some people have no pride or shame.

    Like

  45. kallibella says:

    Disturbing that the BLM movement is only concerned with the lives of the thug and criminal elements in their community whose life was ended provoked by their utter disregard for the law.

    They represent the thug who lost his life because he wrestled with a cop for the cop’s gun is what matters to this BLM bunch. They don’t even talk or want to mention the criminal record of the thugs for whose lives they are demanding respect. They in essence are saying that being black allows you to be a criminal with impunity and when they are taken down by the law, that’s when they cry “black lives matter.” That is the life of the criminal matters.

    They negate the value of the black cop who is murdered and targeted by other blacks, why? Because the cop is law abiding and is doing his job to serve and protect all the people in the community, black communities and white communities. Their lives don’t matter, because they happen NOT to be black criminals. It is a racist movement asking for the mainstreaming of criminals to be hailed as heroes.

    The black lives of little innocent kids in the south side of Chicago don’t matter either. The black lives of unborn black babies murdered by abortionists like Kermit Gosnell don’t matter. They are all innocent of committing any crime and that’s why they don’t matter.

    They way this criminal-adoring movement uses race is by advancing that blacks who are criminals are heroes when they are shot dead by the law; so they use the front of “black” to support criminal activity.

    Liked by 2 people

    • keebler AC says:

      Well said! Tolerating wrongful and dangerous action by a minority group is to lose a country’s sense of wholesomeness – something Trump said in his Iowa speech after the CNBC debate – that Americans have gotten used to doing because of their pathetic sell-out and frankly, pigeon-holing of citizens, type presidents and congressional representatives.

      The same “tolerating” occurs with illegal immigrants who are mostly males (can you imagine why they are rapists when the hispanic women are left behind as prey for American women?) and Syrian refugees. There should not be a looser standard applied to any ethnic or race group. How else do you hold a country of citizens to a higher standard? You can’t.

      I also don’t see the love affair with Ben Carson as a black physician, the love goes overboard on lowering of standards for blacks such that we are astonished a black person is a neurosurgeon? What the heck?? If Ben was white, he would not be polling well. Look at Rand Paul, another physician – no one cares that he’s a doctor.

      Liked by 1 person

      • kallibella says:

        Keebler, you make a couple of very good points:

        1) Identity politics or the separating of people into groups where one or two general characteristics are shared by the group.
        Example: women, blacks, Hispanics etc.

        If one examines these groups, the individuals in the group have personal and unique circumstances that may not at all be shared by others in the group. But liberals love to separate people into groups, because of instead of endeavoring to produce results that are good for the nation in general, they seek to serve certain constituencies/groups so as to entrap them into voting for them in all election cycles.

        By the way, the members of these group enjoy a sort of very special status, whereby they are viewed as incapable of doing anything wrong EVER. Example: the often strongly implied virtue that blacks can’t be racists by virtue of being black. Such thing we know is not reality because we have heard very racists statements made by blacks against white people, the best exponent of such statements being Oevil himself.

        2) I do believe that Dr. Carson is appealing to some because he has a soft and nice demeanor. I’m sure that to others he may be thought of as the Republican vehicle to say we are not racists as a voting block. This last option if true, I find demeaning to Dr. Carson, because his skin color as opposed to his policies and ideas is what provokes the support. To me that is racial, which in my opinion is not the same as racist.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s