Richmond Virginia, BLM Activists and Candidate Security…

Yesterday you might have noticed some media stories about Donald Trump and the possibility of Secret Service protection or lack thereof.

This coincides with a prior day event in Richmond Virginia where race-based activists from the “Black Lives Matter” movement attempted to disrupt the rally.

VA 1VIRGINIA […]  Early in Trump’s remarks, a handful of college students sought to disrupt the rally after he started discussing the immigration issue, saying: “We’re going to build the wall.”

The students chanted “Dump Trump.”

The crowd responded “We want Trump!”

“That’s OK,” Trump said. “That’s why we have freedom of speech.”

Moments later, during another small protest, police stepped between people in the crowd who yelled at one another after a young woman began shouting “black power.”

Several protesters were escorted out of the hall.  (read more)

Those of you who have followed the evolution of “The Dream Defenders” know they are supported by the Obama administration DOJ-CRS and in 2013/14 morphed into the more militant “Black Lives Matter” activists.  We have also noted historically there are specific geographies for epicenter events and BLM activity:

• Madison, Wisconsin • Philadelphia, PA • Saint Louis, MO • Baltimore, MD • Memphis, TN • Houston, TX • Charleston, SC • Atlanta, GA • Louisville, KY • Charlottesville, VA – Cincinnati, OH • New York, NY and Chicago IL

Understanding that a Donald Trump candidacy represents the most severe push-back upon progressive leftist ideology in the past decade, it becomes likely the political decision-makers would leverage BLM to achieve specific goals as it relates to the 2016 presidential election.

The 2007/2008 Obama Campaign utilized labor unions, specifically SEIU, as the violent arm of the presidential campaign (skull cracking compliance, and disrupting opponent events etc).   The racially inspired events of the past 5+ years lend possibility to the thought of union action being replaced by social justice warriors like the BLM group for 2016.

Something to keep an eye on.

va 2potus and Holder president obama and eric holder

The Anger Games

 

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Bernie Sanders, BGI - Black Grievance Industry, CRS, Donald Trump, propaganda, Racism, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

153 Responses to Richmond Virginia, BLM Activists and Candidate Security…

  1. racerxx says:

    So glad these guys were shown the door in Richmond!

    Liked by 5 people

  2. Clc says:

    so, are they terrorist, rebels, moderate rebels, radicals, or what. I do think they are PAID mercenaries.

    Liked by 5 people

  3. stringy theory says:

    They are just another Soros-funded bunch of goons like Acorn and the rest. When Trump becomes POTUS and cleans out the DOJ and other federal departments/agencies, lackeys like those who tried to disrupt Trump in Richmond won’t be tolerated and will be investigated which they should be.

    Liked by 6 people

  4. bofh says:

    The Mike Valerio tweet says “Massive disruption” – is that correct, or is he wishcasting a bit?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. jackphatz says:

    Who is calling the shots here, the DOJ ? Once and if Trump brought this subject to light, wouldn’t that in itself burst a few balloons? The more people are educated on the realities of the progressive leftist ideology as what has destroyed our society the faster we can reverse course. ( I know, that’s years away but it’s a start).

    Liked by 1 person

  6. ZurichMike says:

    Anyone around during the 1968 election? Even as a child then, I remember all the riots and hippies protesting against Nixon.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. razor1 says:

    To me the funniest aspect of this whole black lies matter club is a cursory look at all the cities and police departments they are most po’ed with….are democrat run towns and mostly states. Just like for a 100 years in the south the oppressors…..were democrats.

    It’s always the same…the democrats oppress the black folks…then they turn around and say…you can’t do what were doing to these black folks it’s racism….then the black folks vote for the democrats…..it could make one think that…they are running a scam together!

    Liked by 3 people

  8. steve fraser says:

    BLM= Domestic Terrorists

    Liked by 2 people

  9. drdebdrdeb says:

    Two young Asian women at Trump, Norcross, GA. They were wearing white shirts and sports bras. They removed their shirts to display anti-Trump I am a legal migrant verbiage. The crowd held them down until the police could reach them and throw their sorry backsides out.

    Liked by 7 people

    • notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

      You just know they were PAID!

      Snark

      Liked by 2 people

    • yes, i think American citizens should be more proactive. we are the boots on the ground so to speak and we can recognize agitators a lot more quickly than security can. it’s time to take back our country.

      now, i am PERPLEXED how it is that that Hispanic agitator wearing profanity (F Trump and the Spanish P word) got inside in the first place. i know that in an airport they would be asked to change their shirt and frankly many other places as well.

      security needs to be beefed up and Americans need to pay more attention too. i commend the ones that caught the 2 women agitators and held them down. what i am concerned about is it doesn’t sound like they even have a “DOOR MAN” to check folks as they walk in the building. even a BAR has THAT!

      i wonder do they have metal detectors? 20,000 people or even 2,000 people is a recipe for disaster. something has to be done about just general security. wearing humongous Fxxx TRUMP with P word is a clear indication there’s a problem. and profanity is NOT covered by freedom of speech.

      these aren’t 1970 high school pep rallies, it’s 2016 and domestic terrorists and agitators and criminals and wackos with guns abound. gone are the days of the hippy protests and riots, those pale in comparison to what we have now.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tnwahm says:

        I doubt they would be removed from an airport. Why? Because of profanity? I’ve seen lots of distasteful and profane t-shirts. I didn’t feel the need to call police or security.

        As far as getting into the place, I attended a Ted Cruz rally here. As I was walking in from the parking lot, there were a couple of twenty somethings that were carrying purple sweatshirts. One started to put his on and then decided against it. This was in August, so I knew they were’t carrying them because they were cold. When I arrived inside, I informed my friend who is on the Cruz team here in TN. I pointed them out. I’m sure they were kept on eye on.

        Liked by 2 people

        • profanity like the one that guy had on it, maybe ok for a bar, although the P word to English speakers seems mild cuz it is not in English. but very vulgar profanity in Spanish.

          for instance, wear it to church? no!
          wear it to a Trump rally? no!
          wear it to a Clinton rally, probably ok if kids are not there.

          in addition to the profanity and the place where it is worn can be incendiary changing the meaning to even be worse.

          O you are wrong on the airport thing. walking into an airport with huge letters with the F WORD AND THE P WORD you will be asked to remove your shirt. i fly all the time for years. have seen less things on shirts where they ask the person to cover their shirt or remove it.

          especially if you’re flying to another country a BIG NO-NO!

          Liked by 1 person

        • your “doubts” are based on assumption:

          STUDENT REMOVED FROM AIRPLANE FOR F WORD BEING ON SHIRT:
          http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2015/03/24/Southwest-flight-ejects-student-over-profane-T-shirt/6451427208344/

          and many more instances here:
          https://www.google.com/search?q=airport+regulations+profantiy+tshirt&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

          and especially if the profanity on the T-shirt was specifically a profane statement being made to the person holding the event, like that guy’s was at the Trump event. Fxxx Trump you Pxxx.

          anyone who fly a lot already knows this. in fact, some women have been kicked off the plane or not allowed to board if dressed “indecent.” indecent to be determined by the airline. in other countries it is more strict, e.g., italy a man cannot go without his shirt in pubic places, not at parks not on trains not to the store, not anywhere. and can be arrested.

          Liked by 1 person

          • David says:

            Did anyone see the story about the protesters crying the blues because the city council would not bring pizza in for the poor hungry downtrodden victims of white privilege in Baltimore

            Liked by 1 person

          • tnwahm says:

            I’ve got to start reporting all the fashion disasters, indecent and vulgar t-shirts I see worn to our church. I am sure the police dept will love me. As far as airport security resting on profane dress, I’d rather have them looking for bombs and burkas than a t-shirt with an F bomb on it. I’m sure you love it when the TSA gets all up close and personal with you.

            BTW, private institutions like airlines can have their own dress code to be family friendly, smoker friendly, hooker friendly, BS friendly or whatever, but I have big problems with having an individual arrested for wearing a “profane” t-shirt in a public place.

            Like

    • mscynlynn says:

      I saw them afterwards with two boys and some man interviewing them using his cell phone for a camera. One of the girls had F Trump written on her chest with what looked like lipstick. I pointed and laughed.

      Liked by 2 people

      • FireAm 85 says:

        I don’t know for certain, but they may have changed shirts once inside the venue.
        But yes, once they had their shirts on, someone in the crowd should have alerted security or police. If nothing else ,to just keep an eye on them.
        I believe wholeheartedly the media wants large scale violence at one of Trumps events.

        Liked by 2 people

      • 1american1st says:

        🙂

        Like

  10. Arkindole says:

    Recall that Jorge Gilberto Ramos Ávalos was one of the recent recipients of the 2015 negative reinforcement awards. I foresee many more being given out by real security details. I would also take the interview with Greta (“I’d take your ammo”) as a pre-announcement of things to come.

    A good part of the population still finds pleasure in watching a parent discipline an unruly child.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Southern Son says:

    The 60’s and 70’s protest were prog/Alinsky inspired and promoted also. Weatherunderground=blm.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. prescient11 says:

    One photo you should find Sundance of the Trump supporter getting into the radical’s face and giving it right back. That distinguishes Trump supporters from all others. We are willing to get bloody in the streets to fight these commies. Bout time.

    Liked by 10 people

    • smiley says:

      truly.

      Liked by 1 person

    • if we don’t then we get what we deserve. we must protect ourselves and our country. too many times Americans lay down and bite the pillow. THAT has got to stop. this live and let live i won’t open my mouth stuff has to end. it has brought nothing but compromise and is weak. stand up and speak up. AMERICA CAN BE SILENT NO MORE! and shame on Christians we are the worst about this, when Christians should be the most vocal strong and courageous. STAND UP for TRUTH!
      truthfully, i would’ve went up to that guy and reported him for just for having those filthy words on his shirt!

      Liked by 1 person

      • tnwahm says:

        And what law was broken by the filthy words on his t-shirt? Do you want to be arrested for wearing a pro-Trump t-shirt?

        Like

        • 2010 Code of Virginia
          Title 18.2 – CRIMES AND OFFENSES GENERALLY.
          Chapter 9 – Crimes Against Peace and Order (18.2-404 thru 18.2-433.3)
          18.2-427 – Use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways or by other methods.

          § 18.2-427. Use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways or by other methods.

          Any person who uses obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or makes any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threatens any illegal or immoral act with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, over any telephone or citizens band radio, in this Commonwealth, is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

          “Over any telephone” includes, for purposes of this section, any electronically transmitted message that is received or transmitted by telephone.

          (Code 1950, § 18.1-238; 1960, c. 358; 1964, c. 577; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1976, c. 312; 1984, c. 592; 2010, c. 565.)

          Liked by 2 people

  13. mpmp2015 says:

    Greatest Trump answer EVER!!! (Well, until next week when he tops this one!)

    Here’s the Bloomberg reporter’s question: Let’s say you are in the Oval Office, who are the first four global leaders you would call on the phone?

    Trump’s answer: I might NOT call any global leaders, I think I’ll probably have them call ME.

    Reporter: STOP, diplomacy, though, Mr. Trump…

    Trump: EXCUSE ME!!! I know more about diplomacy than anybody!

    You see, any other candidates will be struggling to give four names and screwing it up if some of the names on the list are not what the pundits feel are more important. But, he completely went 100% on The Art of the Deal and WAIT for others to CALL HIM. Yeah, that’s right. Once you call some one, you are already in a subservient role and lost the initiate or any serious bargaining power. He’s Donald Trump, he doesn’t call you, you want something, you CALL HIM. Now, if you should have called him first but didn’t and then Trump has to track you down to talk to you, then you are in big trouble…..then you have to do everything he says.

    See: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2015-10-16/donald-trump-china-scamming-the-u-s-

    Liked by 12 people

  14. rsmith1776 says:

    Without any paranoid inclinations, these security concerns should be taken very very seriously.

    Not frequently in democratic history the hopes of the so many (and the nightmares of others) hang on the presence, energy, charisma, and transformational powers of One Single Person. I know their context, personality, culture, mannerisms and much besides are severely different, but I see some of Winston Churchill in Donald Trump. Remember how Churchill was dismissed in the years before WWII as an old crank, a lunatic, a (sounds familiar?) apocalyptic buffoon.

    These rare situations, in which so much depends on one person, are the kind that make, not inevitable of course, but more likely the avenue of direct violence, often in cunningly prepared false flag acts. Not trying to be morbid or conspiratorial here but imagine how many POWERFUL people would sleep better tomorrow, if this one annoying fly in the ointment (from their wicked perspective) would somehow “magically” disappear.

    A couple of rowdy, vulgar agitators is not such a big deal. I am truly afraid though that before this is over things much worse than that might happen. Sorry to say. Let’s pray and hope for the best.

    Liked by 9 people

    • smiley says:

      totally agree with you ,rsmith.
      the patsy carrying the false flag.
      it just depends on who might feel threatened, and over what.
      serious times.
      a lot at stake.
      Trump goes against the grain.
      he is truly independent.
      that’s always risky.
      but he knows that…its why he’s running !
      its just as risky, in the Oval Office…if not more so.

      God Bless & Protect Donald Trump, and his family.
      TRUMP in 2016!

      Liked by 5 people

    • Sentient says:

      Supposedly, “El Chapo” has offered $100 mil reward for DT, dead or alive. DT needs SS protection ASAP.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Polish Rifle says:

        CBS News reported that Obama unilaterally decides what POTUS candidates are eligible for SS protection. WTF?

        Like

      • smiley says:

        he should definitely have top notch security…..his own, trusted, hand-picked security, imo.

        Liked by 4 people

      • bofh says:

        Because SS is so trustworthy and well-run these days? Betcha a bunch of private merc’s would be a better idea.

        Liked by 5 people

      • rsmith1776 says:

        Yes! The kind of tragic scenario I had in mind, God forbid, is horrible people like that being furtively yet deliberately allowed to do the… unthinkable. Plausible deniability on all fronts. A “win” for the really ugly power players … Bronco Zero and others giving a little sad speech…. “despite what divided us politically, we disagree with such acts”…. than moving on.

        I apologize for the pessimism of such thoughts and of course I intensely hope they are completely unwarranted. I will stop after this message.

        History shows though that cynical caution is preferable to drunken optimism.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Don’t worry, rsmith. My pessimism has caused me to stop commenting here for the most part.

          I still read each day’s threads, but momma said, “If ya don’t have anything good to say…”

          😀

          That said, I do believe that Trump — no idiot, he — has personal security that is better and wiser than Obama’s, and probably always has.

          I worry much more about Obama’s martyrdom at the hands of his own party (while framing the Right-wing) than I do about Trump’s (which would ironically be also at the hands of HIS own party, while framing the Right-wing, which his own party hates).

          Liked by 5 people

      • JeremyR says:

        He needs something better than the presidential party patrol. He needs a detail that is former Seals, Rangers, Para, and Recon, the best our Military ever trained, fit and full of fight. Men who care about this country enough to write a blank check and dare any to cash it.

        Liked by 4 people

        • PatriotKate says:

          Trump should hire a bunch of the Oathkeepers and add them to his already excellent security.. Most of them are former military and they have taken an additional oath to uphold the Constitution they swore to uphold when they signed up for the military.

          Liked by 2 people

      • NewOrleans says:

        According to this article:

        Secret Service grants protection once a candidate submits an application to the Department of Homeland Security — which Trump has yet to do — and once it is approved by the DHS secretary and a Congressional advisory committee.

        “If a request is received, this authorization is determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with a congressional advisory committee which includes the Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority Leader, Senate Minority Leader, and one additional member selected by the aforementioned committee,” DHS press secretary Marsha Catron said in a statement.

        http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/14/trump-thinks-he-should-have-secret-service-protection/

        Oh, great! Boehner and Pelosi get a say in Donald’s protection. What could go wrong?

        Like

    • IntoTheFray says:

      I have the same fears. The Political Elite(PE) stands to lose a lot of their power and a ton of money, in the Trillions, if Trump is elected. They will not take this laying down as it has taken them decades to get the infrastructure and the right people into the right places. The price of a hit man/suicide bomber is significantly less and there are plenty of them wanting their 72 virgins. If successful, there is no replacement for Trump. MSM: “So sorry, but there are other good candidates, just chose either Bush or Clinton”
      These are scary, scary times.

      Liked by 4 people

    • “A couple of rowdy, vulgar agitators is not such a big deal.” there you have it: compromise.

      all it takes is ONE.

      there were at least 9 or more. any one of them could’ve and probably did have a knife and had they not been subdued quickly we’d be looking at an injury or fatality caused by rowdy vulgar agitators. the way that one Hispanic guy spoke he was obviously not just an agitator and his dress and stance and lingo sounded gang banger ish!

      the women ok, they agitators maybe not a big deal. but that other guy and his friends, a disaster waiting to happen.

      Like

    • Duchess says:

      I happened to re-read “Captains and Kings” the other week . It was written long ago, but it really did scare me re safety of Mr. Trump. So hoping he will be safe.

      Like

      • PatriotKate says:

        Great book! I read it more than a half dozen times nearly 40 years ago; although at the time I didn’t really get the significance. However a few months ago I found my hardbound copy on the bookshelf and looked at the appendix. Interesting all the references then to research on the NWO. Taylor Caldwell was trying to warn us then.

        Like

    • Monroe says:

      I agree. Yet the current WH resident remains safe and sound. Of course he has a private security detail/army that makes the SS unnecessary.

      Like

  15. Garrison Hall says:

    GOPe/Uniparty agitprop. First we saw the “Obama is a Muslim” questioner, followed by the hapless “indignant feminist” operative, and now the “BLM” “protesters”. What they would love to create is a fight between “red-neck” Trump supporters and “innocent” BLM or Dreamer “protesters”. They apparently got close to that kind of confrontation at the Virginia speech.

    The next anti-Trump effort will be to label him and his supporters as racist. Even if the “confrontations” are carefully stage-manged, you can bet the media elites, especially FOX News, will present it as the “unexpectedly racist core of the Trump constituency” and will then start demanding that Trump be held “accountable” for the inherent racism of his campaign and its supporters.

    Once the label “racist” is affixed it cannot be removed. Denying that you, your campaign, or your constituency is racist will only confirm that that you are, in fact, racist. The GOPe/Uniparty will stop at nothing. Benn there, done that. This is a time-worn ploy. GO TRUMP!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

      The Media (MSM) are the Racists in this country…

      Liked by 1 person

    • “Once the label “racist” is affixed it cannot be removed.” ????????

      say what????? well maybe, but only if there is truth in it.

      those days are OVER. and only worked when Obama’s spell was upon the land. the Obama spell has been broken. Trump did that with the truth broadcast every day in the media.

      we must never let others wrong opinions guide our actions. otherwise we become actors in their script and our lives dictated by them. the one problem in USA, that perpetuated this Obama spell was the eagerness to let darkness and evil prevail all because white people were afraid of being called a name? total on your knees head in the pillow behavior and attitude. perhaps that works on whites that do feel guilty i don’t know.

      but for us that do not feel guilty because we actually do love all peoples it doesn’t work. lies and being called “racist” cannot hurt us. what can hurt us is if we legitimize their lies by cowering down to them.

      Liked by 4 people

      • you are correct on that because once you start defending you’ve lost. even Trump said that.
        but what is great about Trump’s campaign and us supporters is we are NOT defending our positions because we don’t have to and defending is weak. no need to defend a lie.
        it is way more powerful to just keep surging on and ignoring their lies and by actions showing them to be lies. one reason Trump is such a strong leader is he doesn’t defend or explain nor go out of his way to address their lies.
        we love America, we don’t like criminals, no need to defend that position.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Garrison Hall says:

          Given Trump’s success, about the only thing the GOPe can do is try to take some of that away from him by calling him and his supporters racists. The GOPe has already attempted to to that with the Tea Party and so these tactics are certainly in the Karl Rove dirty-tricks playbook. They’re also right out of Saul Allinsky’s playbook too: demonize, isolate, freeze, destroy. The GOPe most likely regards Trump’s crowds of supporters to be a weak link since they’re made up of average Americans who weren’t particularly political until now. Watch for “protesters” (actually paid operatives) like the BLM to try to provoke Trump supporters into fighting. Then the left wing media, including Fox, will pounce and start repeating the racist charges. They’re hope is if they tell the Big Lie enough times, people will start to believe it. It doesn’t always work—the resilience of the Tea Party is a good example—but sometimes it does. GO TRUMP!!

          Like

      • Ono says:

        I saw Trump a month ago in San Pedro on the USS Iowa. There was a large group of protesters, who disrupted the National anthem and tried (unsuccessfully) to ruin the day. This event was for veteran’s. After Donald’s speech he went over and waved to the protesters. Walking back to my vehicle I initially, was a little intimidated. That feeling was soon dispelled when I got a good look at who they were/are. Un educated, disrespectful cowards. If it wasn’t for jail overcrowding they would be missing another government hand out…three hots and a cot.

        Liked by 1 person

        • how exciting that you were THERE! thanks for sharing. interesting the protesters what you said because of course the media only interviewed this one Hispanic couple that were homeowners and looked quite decent. of course now to hear they were like how you say, that is why the media only showed the upstanding looking Hispanic couple to interview.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Ono says:

          That said…Trump should have the ultimate protection. Look what happened to Bobby Kennedy. “It’s not the dog you have to worry about; it’s the person who trained it to attack and let’s it off it’s leash”. I think that quote was from “Kung Fu”

          Liked by 1 person

  16. BobNoxious says:

    CNN reported on this disruption in such a blatantly biased manner- although that is the norm now. They made it seem as though the Trump supporters started it all while running video that shows the complete opposite- it showed that black women attacking multiple people.

    CNN also highlighted this supposed “spitting incident” yet this never caugh on any of the dozens of cameras in the area. Sounds a lot the like the supposed “racial slurs” shouted at the dem congress delegation that matches to the house to vote for Obamacare.

    It’s also interesting that all the broadcast cameras were centered in these folks right as the altercation took place & makes you wonder if they knew about it before hand.

    Liked by 2 people

    • notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

      They certainly did.
      .
      All staged and rehearsed!
      .
      They’re in Show Business don’t you know!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Polish Rifle says:

      Remember that black congressman who insisted he was spat upon during a public march? Dozens of TV cameras in the proximate area without one drop of flying spittle being recorded – yet, he continued promulgating the lie for weeks thereafter.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tnwahm says:

        I think you are remembering when CongressCritter John Lewis and other Congressional Black Caucasians claimed they were called the N word during the ObamaCare protest in DC. Andrew Breitbart offered first a $10K and the $100K reward for anyone with a video substantiating said event. No one ever claimed it. Imagine that.

        There was an incident where spit did land on a Congressional Black Caucasian during the rally, but the video showed that it was most likely accidental and not intentional. A protester was a bit exuberant in his chanting.

        My dh and I watched the movie Hating Breitbart on Netflix recently and this incident was covered extensively.

        Liked by 1 person

    • dizzymissl says:

      The spitting incident was caught on camera. You can find it on google.

      Like

      • oldtoenail says:

        That is a lot of territory to look for it.

        Like

      • Eskyman says:

        “The spitting incident was caught on camera.” Oh rly?

        Andrew Breitbart offered a reward of $10,000 for a video of that incident; when that got no results, he increased the reward to $100,000. Still no takers!

        So if you have a video showing this, you could’ve made big money; no one did, so “google” won’t cut it here. Put up a link to this fictional video or take it back!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Eskyman says:

          OK, my apologies, this has already been covered (but thanks to the wonders of WordPress, several replies were not visible when I posted my reply.) The “spitting incident” that Rep. Lewis lied about was the one I was replying to, the same that tnwahm covered above very well.

          The other “spitting incident” was indeed videoed, though I’m not at all convinced that the Trump supporter actually did spit, or was just being emphatic in his disagreement with the guy in the obscene T-shirt; a front view would be better to determine that, but if you say he spit, then I won’t argue. (If it had been me, I certainly might have spit on that a**hole!)

          Like

        • dizzymissl says:

          I did.

          Like

  17. Doodahdaze says:

    Allow me to dedicate this song to all the BLM fools. You can’t have any fun following the leader. We are canceling your Black Revolution. Govern yourself accordingly. Surrender now if you expect any mercy. We are coming for you. Step back and jump in the line. Resistance is futile. This is your last chance. Your time is up. Nobody likes it. Try a little Calypso or you will callapso. Nobody likes you. Go Away!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Polish Rifle says:

      I know quite a few black folks who would love to whomp on their sorry arses.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Doodahdaze says:

        Me too.

        Liked by 1 person

        • smiley says:

          HB made another calypso hit called The Jackass Song (or something like that).
          Jackass will jump and bray…
          snappy little tune, too.

          Like

      • good point. i think it’s important to state that BLM is an aberrant group and definitely not reflect the opinions nor behavior of most Black Americans. we are not so ignorant to believe low class trash BLM represents good black folks, anymore than we would think like low class trash nazi skinheads represent good white folks. trash is trash and comes in all colors and races. just like LA RAZA, nothing but low class trash that doesn’t represent good Hispanic folks either. in nature aberrant behavior leads to their own death cuz it’s anti survival in nature.

        Liked by 2 people

  18. Louisville, Ky.
    You have that exactly correct. Louisville seems to fly under the Radar. I will only say…. Go Viper unit!!

    And now..

    Go Trump!!

    Like

  19. boutis says:

    Since these are private venues by virtue of Trump hiring the halls for a specified period of time, aren’t the “state police” also probably being paid by Trump as private security? These protesters do not have any right to crash, disrupt, fight with anyone at a private non-government event and can be ejected at will. The media and this group is trying to protray this a government gathering with First Amendment rights which it isn’t.

    Liked by 3 people

    • i think you are right. i know that when i used to put on shows (bands) we would have to by law depending on the venue used, hall or whatever, we had to hire 2 law enforcement per a certain number of people, but if my memory serves me correct, that depended on what county it was held it. was MANY years ago so i forget the details. and in that one case we had to pay the officers with our own money which was included in the rent of the hall, it wasn’t something that came free. it was like $200 per officer. probably gone up considerably since THEN!

      Like

  20. Clyde Boyd says:

    Hundred years In the past This would be settled promptly.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. dizzymissl says:

    Liked by 1 person

  22. ThankYou,Treepers says:

    Thomas Sowell has written extensively about what was always called “The National Association for the Advancement of CERTAIN People”, within the black community in reference to what he calls “the old mulatto elite”.

    Isn’t it ironic how that same dynamic manifests today to the extreme, the Obama Administration being led by light-skins (more black phraseology) BHO, Jarrett, Holder, and designated liar Rice, all of whom obviously have dominant white ancestry.

    So nothing changed in the 100 years between the NAACP founding and the BHO initial inauguration. Mixed race, light skin “blacks” still hold the most resentment toward whites and still incite the race issue as a wedge for their own personal advantage without regard to the consequences to others of each race or society as a whole.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jeans2nd says:

      My mom, who was poor white trash born and reared in Laurel, Miss during Jim Crow, and a teacher here of blacks and poor white trash, told us early on the very dark skinned kids were called “rusty n…..s” and the lighter skinned were “high yellows.” Social standing depended on skin color. Seems like nothing has changed. Sad.

      Like

  23. DMorgan says:

    Some black and hispanic supporters of Trump should organize themselves and start to patrol the events. Their job would be to get in the face of these protesters as soon as they start acting up. Not do them any violence per se (but they do have the right to defend themselves). This would show that minorities do vigorously support Trump and would deny the media their “racists white trump supporters hurting the poor little minorities that just want justice” videos moments.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Ian Stout says:

    What I found refreshing was seeing people actually confronting these fools and attacking their propaganda and false narrative and not being afraid of a confrontation with them! Its great to see good Americans stand up and not be PC or afraid of a confrontation for a change!

    Liked by 1 person

  25. amjean says:

    We and Trump need to take very seriously the Black Lives Matter crowd and
    the Hispanic gang leader threat, etc. Obama led the charge on not defending
    police officers regarding obvious justified shootings of thugs. What did they
    do next? They are shooting police officers all over the country. I suspect
    it would not be a reach for these thugs to target Trump.

    I wouldn’t trust the Secret Service. Perhaps some special forces guys who
    are currently not serving could offer their services to Trump. Also, the revenue
    he is speaking at needs to make sure there is good security. What about
    those guys in red hats who used to patrol the trains? Are they still around?

    Like

  26. amjean says:

    Meant “venue”, not “revenue”. Auto correct drives me crazy.

    Like

  27. I still want Trump given SS protection. I cruise the internet. No one is threatening to do in Bush, or Carson, or Clinton, or Bernie or Cruz, but I keep hearing all this chatter about how we must get rid of Trump, and can’t someone do something about Trump. All you need is some nut with a crush on say Megyn Kelly, and something terrible could happen.

    Like

  28. hocuspocus13 says:

    Wake me up when it is all over and Trump is President ✌

    Liked by 1 person

  29. e.g.g. says:

    Yesterday on MSNBC they showed Trump supporters arguing with the “protesters”.
    Of course MSNBC spun the story to show that Trump was to blame, his supporters are horrible people, etc.

    The photo above of the black male with the black shirt that has a bad saying about Trump was also shown on MSNBC…….but only his back. Now I know why. The news showed a Caucasian spitting at this particular black with the derogatory shirt about Trump……no wonder the news did not show the front of the black man…..exposing what the shirt says might justify why the Caucasian male spit at the black male, and who knows what the black male said to the Caucasian.

    Thanks for posting that photo off the offensive shirt. I knew the news was making Trump look bad. I wondered why the fronts of some of these paid protestors were not shown.

    Like

  30. shirley49 says:

    Of course these guys are ok but he hires another czar to go after conservatives, Christians, Jews and whites. He really is a sick man.

    Liked by 1 person

    • David says:

      Obama, Trump and Netanyahu were adrift in a boat and there was only food for one. They took a vote to see which one should stay and which two should go overboard . Obama won 352 to 2.

      Like

  31. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:

    As we get closer and closer to the Iowa February 1st caucus to more intense the pressure will be on the RNC to get rid of trump. The DNC will also to what they can because they know trump would bet Hillary. Michal More might even make a Move about the assassination of Trump.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s