As if on cue the Salem Media machine starts singing the praises of Representative Paul Ryan for Speaker of the House.   ~ GOOD TIME TO REMEMBER THIS ~

If two weeks of upheaval brought us @RepPaulRyan as Speaker, well worth it. Forgotten in days, he'd lead for decade or more. On his terms.

— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) October 9, 2015

No-one needed any further evidence of how insufferably corrupt the progressive republican party has become; however, today is a brutal reminder of just how much the GOPe absolutely despise the base of their own party.

There were three names available for the secret ballot to take place in congress, Kevin McCarthy, Jason Chaffetz and Daniel Webster.  While each of the aforementioned names carry both pros and cons, an objective person would have to ask why, if only one name is withdrawn (McCarthy), the House Leadership wouldn’t continue with the secret ballot with the two remaining names.

The decision to stop the vote is yet another blast of sunlight to evidence of what almost every Republican Conservative is now fully aware.  Namely the progressive GOPe will not allow a leadership election to take place without “their chosen progressive” as the ultimate winning nominee.  The uniparty has a strong grip.

Now there is a full court press to make Wisconsin Representative, and former Mitt Romney GOPe running mate, Paul Ryan, the next Speaker of the House.  And the progressive republican party will not take NO for an answer – you will accept him. Period.

The Republican and GOPe media advocates claim it is imperative for the Speaker of the House to represent the entire house, including Democrats, and therefore must be “above politics”.  Horsepucky!

Did you ever see Democrats considering or asking republicans if Nancy Pelosi was okay?  Was there ever a more partisan Speaker than Nancy Pelosi?  Yet, for some insufferable reason this is the approach of the RINO/GOPe caucus and the water-carrying media of high brow pontificates.  Allow me to present the next thousand words via imagery.

Remember this ?

Yeah, how about that “bi-partisan” representation?