Benghazi Committee Will Question Clinton About Libyan Business Deals For Blumenthal….

According to information gleaned within a letter sent from Benghazi Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep Trey Gowdy, to minority Co-Chair Rep Elijah Cummings, there is substantive information now proving Secretary Hillary Clinton took specific actions in Libya to benefit the business interests of her friend Sidney Blumenthal.

hillary clinton and sidney blumenthalHouse Select Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

61 Responses to Benghazi Committee Will Question Clinton About Libyan Business Deals For Blumenthal….

  1. Tracer Round says:

    Hope it doesn’t rock his world to the point of tipping over….

    Liked by 1 person

  2. stringy theory says:

    Cummings and the rest of the black caucus members in Congress are nothing but shills for the crimes of democrats, including those they commit. I am surprised Gowdy is as cordial as he sounds in his letter to Cummings. It would be more than I could endure to have to deal with a low-life like Cummings.

    Liked by 5 people

    • justfactsplz says:

      I wouldn’t last five minutes trying to work with Cummings. He will try to protect Hillary unless he gets it from Obama not to. Hillary belongs in jail. I am not holding my breath waiting for the A.G. to do anything.

      Liked by 1 person

      • e.g.g. says:

        I have been reading Judicial Watch. The judges are as corrupt as the politicians they protect, ignoring laws and the Constitution.
        Very disturbing and disgusting.

        America better start caring, not just Trump supporters.

        Like

    • archer52 says:

      Fox just read some of the contents of the Syndey emails to Hillary. Stephen Hayes, who I like a lot for his clarity and ability to cut to the heart of the issue, pointed out Hillary NEVER told Sydney it was inappropriate for him to guide her on matters in Libya. In fact, she seemed to be helping him get his company in front of British and French contractors dealing with the new Libyan government, she helped put in place- using State Department contractors to give weapons- including man-pads- to the terrorists.

      Which..is..the..whole..Benghazi..thing..in…a..nutshell….

      Go Trey!

      she can bi**h about how it is a right wing conspiracy, but this is ALL ABOUT Obama giving her enough rope to hang herself. And she gleefully took that rope, thinking from past experience, she was immune. If she thinks she will be protected because she will take Obama with her, she hasn’t figured out that whole “But he’s the black guy, you racist!” thing yet.

      If she were anyone else, we’d be seeing CNN repeat the footage of her being “perp walked” into federal jail over and over and over.

      Of course while I sat there, drinking a tall one, and crying just a little with joy, as I hit the repeat button over and over and over.

      (and I might point out in a nice house in Chappaqua, there would be another man, also drinking a tall one and crying just a little with joy as he did the same thing. “No honey, I still love you, if I didn’t would I keep putting money in your canteen fund?”

      And that my friends, may still happen IF she refuses to leave politics.

      Like

      • Crystal says:

        If she takes Bari down with her, who will grant her a pardon? Better that she’s convicted of something, even a misdemeanor, and gets pardoned on his last day in office (in addition to his giving GITMO back to the Castro Bros.) in exchange for keeping her mouth shut on a variety of issues that might paint him in a bad light.

        Like

  3. archer52 says:

    I just listened to Hannity who had a liberal on the show. He said the same thing, that the problem with Hillary will be that the emails will show she gave favors to business and nations who gave her foundation or Bill money.

    That my friend is a crime.

    As in “Okay blondie, you get the upper bunk. Meet your cellmate Tanya. Tanya, when not lifting weights and following the black lives matters stories, likes blondes, so you two will get along just fine.

    Liked by 2 people

    • stringy theory says:

      I would love to see the scenario you suggest come about, but I’m afraid she will skate somehow. It all depends on obozo the Kenyan and whether he can do the job w/out getting crap on his own skirt.

      Like

    • Crystal says:

      So she invades a country because she anticipates a possible financial windfall? Unbelievable. Look at the mess she left behind. Libya is now a staging ground for terrorism in the Middle East and Europe and is partly responsible for the migrant crisis.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Ziiggii says:

    the real meat is in Section IV on page 10 to the end…. man, I’m not sure Tom Clancy could write this stuff!

    Liked by 1 person

    • jeans2nd says:

      The preamble – prior to Item I – is just as masterful, imo. Gowdy appears to be one of the very best.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Ziiggii says:

        Agree it should be read in it’s entirety

        Liked by 1 person

        • I read it. Every last word. And I intend to read it a few more times, just to be sure that it ALL sinks in. Think of the ramifications of what Gowdy just revealed… Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to influence both National AND International policy on behalf of a personal friend who was violating federal law (and endangering US National Security in the process) for his own personal gain.

          Gee, could THIS be why the Framers made it necessary for CONGRESS to be involved before the Commander-In-Chief of our armed forces could engage in acts of WAR?

          Liked by 3 people

          • Ziiggii says:

            LJP, we need to cross reference all the new revelations against the “Benghazi Brief”; things are really starting to line up.

            Need more eyes and help while SD works on other stuff. Minus a few updates/changes to the original brief and a few more details this thing is solid gold. I am getting a sense that POTUS has plenty of cover from this fallout (unless the Clinton’s pull a rabbit out of the hat) that all this will fall onto Hildabeast squarely.

            Liked by 1 person

    • kpm58 says:

      The letter does have a nice flow. Something Jack Ryan might have written.

      Like

  5. formercanuck says:

    Trey Gowdy for Attorney General!

    Liked by 2 people

    • x 1000!

      I had become discouraged by the apparent lack of progress by Gowdy’s investigation until I read this. Now it’s plain to see that he’s been extremely diligent in the search for truth. I hope he nails her to the wall, if not for the deaths of Ambassador Stevens, and the other 3 victims of Benghazi, then at least for her complete disregard for US national security AND for using her office for the financial benefit of one of her cronies.

      LOCK THAT WOMAN UP!

      Liked by 3 people

      • auscitizenmom says:

        I believe that things are going to continue to get worse for her, until she quits the campaign. Then, it will all just disappear from the news cycles altogether and fade into the sunset. If she starts swinging back at Obama and ValJar, she will end up in jail or, gasp, having a heart attack or another stroke.

        Like

  6. joshua says:

    I wonder what Martin Luther King Jr would say about the content of Cummings CHARACTER if he were alive.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. kinthenorthwest says:

    Strange I just got done arguing with a Jewish co-worker who has 2 college doctorates about Hillary breaking laws Never even hit on the Benghazi Laws she broke).
    First response was that they are only after Hillary because they don’t want a woman president. I pointed out that that there are other women running that have not broken several Federal Laws.
    I could not believe how many times she said that it was OK for Hillary to break laws, but Hillary would be a good person as president. I pretty much ended it with that this does NOT set a good example for Americans when you say that someone can break several federal laws and still be president.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Rick says:

      Sorry to be rude but that person despite her degrees is an IDIOT!
      I would avoid that co-worker at all cost if possible. She is a danger to be around. Ha!
      Unfortunately, it may take an unforseen massive disaster to wake up this country. I pray that if we don’t get real leadership who loves this country soon, the worst things are surely around the corner for all of us.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Crystal says:

      Why would Hildebeast be a good POTUS? She hasn’t done anything of merit to warrant the position (not that the slug in office is any different). She did nothing as senator; she was a complete DISASTER as Sec/State, causing chaos in the ME through her fecklessness. The migrant crisis abroad and soon to be here is partly her fault. She’s a proven liar who, through incompetence/negligence/recklessness/irresponsibility and greed, may have been selling her office for personal profit and it appears she may have compromised our National Security and the lives and identities of our intel agents and those of our allies.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. Mr. Izz says:

    Great letter.

    Too bad it is already being torn apart by the main stream media and opposing Democrats. If anything, they are saying this proves that the committee is being anti-Hillary and purely political.

    Oh well. I’m just waiting for the day when Hillary says that she’s been cleared in all investigations. If the FBI could take her down, I think they would have by now. I’m not holding my breath anymore. Hilliary will be on the ballot. I just hope Trump can bring her down.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ctdar says:

      Building a case takes time.

      Like

    • froggielegs says:

      I have to agree with you in that no matter what comes out about her, nothing legally will happen to her. Oh she MIGHT lose her political career but she won’t see the inside of a jail cell. But, if it were you or I, well we would be sent up the river. I find myself saying that a lot lately. Seems certain people in life can do what they want and have no real consequences. You know like Bruce Jenner killing a woman and not charged.

      Like

  9. Wow. That letter was a SCATHING indictment of Clinton and Blumenthal, and a B*tchslap to Elijah Cummings. LOVED IT! Trey just gave EC the must cordial “Go Eff Yourself” that I have ever read.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. SharonKinDC says:

    Hell of an indictment of Cummings, Hillary, Blumenthal… WOW!

    Like

    • Yeah, until now I didn’t really understand Blumenthal’s role in the whole Libya debacle, or understand just how much he held Hillary’s ear. That guy should go right to prison with her. Him,and the CIA contact who gave him the name of a human intelligence source regarding Libya and the TNC.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Ziiggii says:

        […]and the CIA contact who gave him the name of a human intelligence source regarding Libya and the TNC.

        Talk about hypocrisy as it relates to General Petraeus not safe guarding classified material ! That CIA guy should be tried for treason at the very least.

        As the fog lifts watch to see which roaches get squished as the other scurry away as fast as possible.

        Like

        • Crystal says:

          It appears Petraeus was appointed CIA director to take the fall for Benghazi should something go wrong. And they already had the goods on him to get him to keep quiet should the fit hit the shan.

          Now that we can surmise the REAL reason for bombing Libya (you mean it wasn’t about genocide or a revolution?), why was Stevens’ presence requested in Benghazi on the anniversary of what Islamos consider one of their greatest conquests? Other than being set up for a “kidnapping” to exchange for the blind sheik as US polling was adamantly opposed to releasing the sheik outright? Morsi’s men were there in addition to the “attackers” and took Stevens to the hospital. When news of his demise got out, Morsi himself demanded the release of the sheik. One of the “attack” planners admitted months later it was to kidnap the ambassador, but that news cycle lasted only one day.

          Like

    • safvet says:

      This should be used as an Indictment…save the Grand Jury a lot of work…

      Liked by 1 person

  11. woohoowee says:

    BOOM!

    Like

  12. woohoowee says:

    Is it asking too much to hope for an email about “let’s tell the American rubes it was a video!”?

    Like

    • I was hoping for something that mentions how Blumenthal will honor a “Quid Pro Quo” for the nice work Hillary was doing for him in Libya.Certainly, she didn’t do this for FREE.

      Like

      • woohoowee says:

        No doubt.

        There is a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach with the realization that four Americans likely lost their lives because someone wanted to make money.

        Like

        • JAS says:

          Although surely the intent I’m sure that the result was not as expected. And yes, it was about money. All this “thought through” by some very ill equipped (mentally) and a profit driven amateurish “I am smarter than the world and I’m getting rich because of this” clowns that don’t know the first thing about how it all works. Zero experience and low IQ.

          The arrogance and elitism of people like Sidney makes me sick. These are the kind of people I can beat hands down with one of my brain lobes tied behind my back. All it takes is age, experience and lastly, intelligence; all of which this current crop of crooks sorely lack.

          Liked by 2 people

    • Chewbarkah says:

      Isn’t it interesting that Blumenthal advised Hillary repeatedly about Libya, yet when Benghazi blew up on her…nothing. Wouldn’t you think she would want his sage advice on how to handle it? Vacuumed.

      Like

      • Crystal says:

        He was the one who allegedly came up with the video excuse.

        Like

        • Chewbarkah says:

          You are correct. I searched and found in an article dated 5-1-15 (by Nick Gass on Politico) that says Blumenthal emailed Hillary the day after the Benghazi attack to say it was a reaction to “The Innocence of Muslims” video trailer. She forwarded it to “Senior foreign policy advisor Jake Sullivan”. So it appears Blumenthal provided Hillary’s first notion of the film excuse. Curiously, Blumenthal emailed her the day after that to say — wait, serious sources say the Ansar terrorist group was behind it. Obviously, she ran with the lie. Gowdy will hopefully ask her to name ALL sources of the video story that she relied upon, and why she rejected B’s correction.

          Like

      • woohoowee says:

        Perhaps there are emails yet to be released that will shed more light on it.

        Like

  13. JAS says:

    I’ve always said that truth is better than fiction. The last part of the letter is devoted strictly to Sidney and it is the stuff that movies and books are made of. The letter is written in a a cold, factual style, “served cold and sliced thin”.

    And where is the MSM in all of this?

    Like

  14. John says:

    It’s amazing how a few people through their own greed disrupt the world.

    All it takes is a few scheming idiots.

    Like

  15. greenmirror says:

    Questions on what led to the Benghazi Terrorist attacks…how about researching back a little further than just that night when Barry was wanting nap time before the Jay-Z Beyonce show to the Stinger/Manpad whatever named missiles that took out American lives in more than a couple Helicopter missions. Who was selling/giving them to whom and why!

    Like

  16. Ziiggii says:

    SD – rereading your brief these new revelations from Gowdy completely solidifies almost all the points presented (minus a few unknowns). Sid’s mention of the French and the known support (cheerleading) of Sarkozy are confirmed as is the “hands off” approach by the DoD.

    […] defense leaders in Washington [March 2011] slammed the brakes on the extent of US help to the rebels. Top officials said that some country other than the US should perform any future training and equipping of the Libyan opposition groups. Under withering congressional probing and criticism of what was described as an ill-defined mission to aid a rebel force that officials know little about, Robert Gates, the US defense secretary, sketched out a largely limited role for the US military going forward.

    Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told members of the House Armed Services panel that many other countries have the ability to train and support the rebels. “My view would be, if there is going to be that kind of assistance to the opposition, there are plenty of sources for it other than the United States,” said Gates. “Somebody else should do that.” Gates and Mullen told Congress that future US participation will be limited and will not involve an active role in airstrikes as time goes on. (link)

    Still reviewing…..

    Like

  17. goodoldboy66 says:

    And as the world turns so the money spigot fascistly flows. Governments and industry in the US (Uniparty), EU, ME, CHN and RU reap payback from every conflict and coup d’etat. Same in MX, South & Central Am and Africa. Look at our own internal ‘conflicts and coup d’etats’ re: immigration and trade deals. I may write a book titled: “Pawn$ for the Privileged” or “The Pawn$ & The Privileged”.

    Like

  18. platypus says:

    While Gowdy is focused on the crimes of Mizz Clintoon, do not overlook the reality that Libya was a US ally at the time of the overthrow. President Bush had flipped Gaddafi into working for us. He turned over all his WMD programs including his nuke programs, he gave NSA and CIA full access to his facilities, and he provided invaluable intel on the bad guys in the ME (intel that only an insider could have access). He kept a hard cap on al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. All he asked from us was our promise to let him be.

    Because this was a secret agreement, only the proper security clearance persons in Congress knew about it. So it was fairly easy for Jugears & Hildabeast to break it using NATO. Did anybody ever ask why NATO? Well, that way even if someone was to complain about breaking the agreement, it could be plausibly denied that the US did it even though 95% of the military used were USA assets. We betrayed Gaddafi, who to the end was waiting for us to honor our agreement only to be captured by thugs masquerading as freedom fighters who promptly killed him on the side of the road (a war crime since he surrendered).

    We have had no good intel from the ME since then which is one reason it’s so screwed up (aside from having a Muzzie symp in the WH). A side effect of betraying Gaddafi – no other comparable person will ever trust the US again.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Well why should they trust us? We aren’t trustworthy. Look at the damage done to the world by our country electing a Socialist like Barack Obama twice. We deserve their scorn and disrespect. I’m ashamed of us. I’m embarrassed by the actions undertaken by President Obama and his administration. I’m appalled at the actions of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This is absolutely despicable conduct.

      Liked by 1 person

  19. That was some letter Chairman Gowdy wrote. I wonder if there was a financial benefit was to the Clintons. Will we ever get to the bottom of this? It’s hard to wrap my head around all of this.

    Remember while all these emails were going back and forth with Blumenthal, Hillary was corresponding with her ambassador. Why did Hillary Clinton send Ambassador Chris Stevens to Benghazi on September 11th? Why didn’t she heed his calls for beefing up security? She left him there, unprotected, a sitting duck.

    I’ve read the Bengahzi Brief twice and understand it. I just can’t believe Hillary Clinton is such a dumb ass. How could she NOT know there would be enemies aware of her actions who would be trying to thwart her and her cohorts plans? Providing weapons to rebels, then trying to get them back…. anyone could see this was a bad idea.

    She’s one dangerous woman. The power of the Presidency will not be wielded well in her hands.

    Like

  20. woohoowee says:

    Why did Hillary Clinton send Ambassador Chris Stevens to Benghazi on September 11th?

    Hmmm….

    -snip-

    One of the reasons Stevens apparently risked going from the more fortified embassy in Tripoli to Benghazi was also detailed in the cable: Stevens planned to unveil a new U.S. project in Benghazi to enhance “cultural and education outreach by U.S. Mission Libya.”

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/21/in-cable-the-day-he-died-us-ambassador-warned-clin/?page=all

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s