A general conversation, and series of questions, has begun amid readers who understand the RNC/GOPe road map and subsequent scheme.  Essentially the question is becoming:

what will the GOPe do regarding their ongoing onslaught to eliminate Donald Trump, if Trump becomes inevitable”?

The answer to that question is fraught with possibilities. However, as a general rule, crossing the Rubicon of inevitability will not change the present course. Here’s why:
Any predictive review must generally reflect upon the “bigger picture” and interests of those who ultimately framed, and continue to finance, the original outline – those interests are Wall Street interests. So before answering the question, you must first remember what they constructed.
karl rove emporerTom donohue 5
There are ten candidates specifically part of the Jeb Bush nomination map.  Not seventeen, TEN!
They are:  ♦ Jeb Bush ♦ – Marco Rubio, Carly Fiorina, Mike Huckabee, Chris Christie, John Kasich, Rick Perry, Lindsey Graham, George Pataki, Jim Gilmore and previously, Rick Perry (anticipate the Perry endorsement and PAC $ headed for Bush).
Each of the aforementioned can be tied to relationships, behavior and specific action in 2014 which reflects their association to the scheme.  Therefore they are in the definitive category – See Here.
That leaves Jindal, Paul, Walker, Santorum, Carson, Cruz and obviously Trump. Excluding Trump, there was nothing in 2014 which would *specifically* tie them *directly* to the road map, therefore we have never aligned them with the group of Jeb party insiders.
[*NOTE* Only those who we could actually and provably identify the motives for, were given the designation of “splitters“.  All others were granted the benefit of doubt.]
Bobby JindalScott Walker120103_rand_paul_ap_328-500x271
However, Bobby Jindal’s recent activity reflects his general favorability, or leaning, toward the GOPe group.  He is not a stupid guy; far from it actually – he’s a Rhodes Scholar.  Yet the severity of his approach shows he is willing to lose his own position in the race to advance a common party goal or interest.
Scott Walker’s recent activity also reflects he is heavily influenced by the DC party machine.  The attachment of Brad Dayspring, famous for his role in the Mississippi race-baiting scheme born of Mitch McConnell, to the Walker Super-PAC was always a red flag.  So the probability of his outcome being pro-Jeb is more than likely.
Rand Paul is best understood from the position of the vanity driven step-mom in Cinderella.  However, when Paul looks in the mirror his focus is upon the reflection of influence, not appearance.   Senator Rand Paul joined fellow Kentuckian McConnell’s scheme team between Christmas ’13 and the State of the Union speech in January of 2014.  Every consequence thereafter has been self-serving quid pro quo.
Ted cruz and rand paul
Rick Santorum was/is irrelevant (floating between 0% and 1% for months). Sorry Rick.
Ben carsonAlso, useful tool, candidate Ben Carson is far more difficult to inflate, than he will be to deflate.
Inflation relies heavily on two needs:  #1) Low-info emotional electorate, which is easily swayed; and, #2) willful blindness by the media; cue Megyn Kelly et al.
Carson essentially became a useful and necessary tool for Team Jeb – as we currently see.  However, his own community doesn’t even know the guy, yet he’s running for President:

In the rural community outside of Baltimore where Carson has lived for nearly 15 years, many of his neighbors claim to have never spoken to him. Some didn’t even know if Carson and his family still live in their seven-bedroom, $1.7-million house set on a 35-acre piece of pastureland between cornfields. They know, vaguely, that he bought another home in Florida (West Palm Beach) for retirement.
“I don’t even think he could win if he was running for mayor out here,” said one of his neighbors, who lives along the winding gravel road that leads to his palatial estate. “No one out here knows him. He tends to insulate himself.” (link)

This level of ease regarding opposition research on Carson simply means that Team Jeb can swat him away faster than you can say ‘Hermain Cain’ as soon as his usefulness has expired.  Carson is the prototype for an RNC useful political tool; the kind of candidate that makes Karl Rove giddy with glee as he thinks about dropping info to media.
All of these non-Jeb candidates (Jindal, Paul, Walker, Santorum and Carson) hold some level of ‘usefulness’ but are not connected –or at least not directly connected– to the overall GOPe scheme as it was constructed in 2014.
Ted Cruz is an entirely different matter – hence our previous outline.  And I will pause because within the next 48 hours we shall know more. (Nuf said for now on Cruz).
Which leads us back to the original question:

“what will the GOPe do regarding their ongoing onslaught to eliminate Donald Trump, if Trump becomes inevitable”?

The Tripwire we identified back in July remains today.  If Wall Street (writ large) views Donald Trump as inevitable, they will re-evaluate –QUICKLY– the opposite side of their controllable coin.  Meaning they will evaluate Hillary Clinton.
Wall Street (The U.S. CoC, Tom Donohue, and all varied interests, DNC/RNC et al) set this up as a win/win. A Clinton/Bush strategy.  If Trump is believed to be inevitable in victory over Bush, they need to re-evaluate the Clinton side STAT.
They’ll have two choices:  #1) Stick with Hillary, or  #2) add Joe Biden (and later Elizabeth Warren as VP).
Personally, I believe they will bring in Biden.  My belief is based on increasingly obvious polling which shows Trump beating Hillary in head-to-head match-ups, AND based on the continuing growth of Trump’s coalition of enthusiastic supporters.
The very real groundswell behind Trump is why we stated Biden would enter, even before head-to-head polling was visible to support it.  The polling only further supports the initial prediction.
We will not necessarily see this upcoming Democrat battle royale taking place.  However, you can be damned sure Bill and Hillary will be calling in all their markers in an effort to sway Wall Street to stick with them.  It’s going to be beyond ugly.
However, I doubt the Clinton’s will succeed this time.  There’s just too much at stake, too much risk, and Hillary has many legal issues the power-brokers can use to leverage her out.
REGARDLESS of the Biden/Clinton battle – the GOPe onslaught against Trump will continue, unrelenting, all the way through the primary.
Why?  Simple answer – go back to the decision-makers; regardless of Biden or Clinton, Trump’s removal is vital.  They will plan for the primary race attacks on Trump to soften him up for destruction in the general election race against Biden or Hillary.
Remember, Wall Street’s goal is Jeb.  Remove Jeb and their goal is to destroy the replacement and get the other side of the coin (Biden/Clinton) into the White House.
These power interests must retain control at all costs.  This fundamental aspect is why the attacks, from both sides, on Donald Trump will continue from now until the general election in November of 2016.
The RNC/GOPe can openly attack Trump until he gets the nomination.  After that they must change to subversive attacks – that’s the only difference.
This is also fundamentally the reason why there’s really no pressure on any “splitter” candidate to drop out.
Traditionally candidates drop out when they don’t have electorate support; their money dries up and they can no longer compete.   That’s not true any longer – now there’s Super-PACs to keep them in the race, and Wall Street to fund the Super-PACs.
So as long as they hold value in attacking Trump, and so long as their Super-PAC’s are funded, the Ten-For-Jeb will continue the fight against Trump regardless of Jeb’s non-viable candidacy.
So there’s the answer to the question:

Trump’s inevitability really doesn’t change the goal much, because the goal never stops being the destruction of Donald Trump.

trump crosses
Makes ya all warm and fuzzy, no?  Each time I look deeply into this scheme I ask myself the same question, who would ever willingly want to put themselves through this nightmare?  I’m left believing only a person with a lifetime of preparation…
…and that would be, Donald Trump !
GOP primary 2
Just a Reminder, this is an insurgency. – The modern enemy of Wall Street is Main Street vulgarians. The enemy of the RNC/GOPe is not Democrats, it’s Grassroots Conservatives, more vulgarians.
The Republican Party, and the Republican media apparatus, view us as their enemy. We are the enemy they need to protect themselves from:

In 2014, the RNC approved selection rules that govern how each state’s delegates are portioned out from the primaries. Under one of the changes, states holding their primaries between March 1 and March 14 will have their delegates doled out proportionately with election results, a change that will likely stymie a movement candidate.

States that have primaries on or after March 15 will be winner-take-all states.
That’s important because another RNC rule change requires that a candidate must win a majority of delegates in eight or more states before his or her name may be presented for nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

With 18 GOP presidential candidates, for now, it will be that much harder for any candidate to win a majority in any state, let alone eight. (Article July 2015)

GOP-versus-Tea-PartyNow, ask yourself, why would the RNC want to “stymie a movement candidate“? Who exactly does that benefit? Obviously, the “non-movement” candidate, ie “the turtle“.
Isn’t the entire reason for campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina etc. to make a movement/momentum?
In addition Rule #40 changed in 2014 from previously five needed state wins, to a newer threshold of eight (8):

Officially, it’s Rule 40 in the RNC handbook and it states that any candidate for president “shall demonstrate the support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight (8) or more states” before their name is presented for nomination at the national convention. (article March 2014)

Again, ask yourself who does this benefit? A candidate can win seven states outright, and still not have their name presented for nomination?
These rules were made/affirmed in 2014 – Who or what exactly was the GOP concerned about blocking in 2016 that would necessitate such rules? When combined with other rule changes you can clearly identify a consolidation of power within the RNC apparatus intentionally constructed to stop the candidate of the GRASSROOTS from achieving victory.

It’s all part of their GOPe Roadmap.

[scribd id=275801456 key=key-PCJtK0b7B7nCxFa71GuO mode=scroll]

update-1 Reference and Resources – (links to internal MSM references are contained within prior outlines):

RNC Rule Changes
RNC Rule Battles

  1. Following The Money
  2. The GOPe Roadmap
  3. ♦ The Roles of The Players – “The Splitters
  4. ♦ How each candidate is aligned in the Roadmap
  5. ♦ Arrow #1 Trump Hits The Super-PACs – The GOPe Achilles Heel
  6. ♦ Arrow #2 Trump Hits Bush – Inside The Wall Street Fortress
  7. ♦ Arrow #3 Trump Cuts Off Rubio/Bush switch – The GOPe Switch
  8. ♦ The Rick Perry Tripwire Exposed – DC Super-Pac
  9. ♦ Jeb Bush Super-Pac Will immediately spend $10 Million
  10. ♦ Proving there is only one political party in Washington DC
  11. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part One (The GOPe Ruse)
  12. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Two (Stop being played)
  13. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Three (Intellectual Details)
  14. ♦ How To Defeat the GOPe Road Map
  15. ♦ Current Polling Exposes – the Ohio, Florida, Texas, Virginia, New York Splitters
  16. ♦ Rush Limbaugh Discusses/AffirmsThe “splitter strategy”
  17. ♦ The Biden Paradox – Trump Winning Means Clinton Must Be Removed
  18. ♦ Salem Media Communications (GOPe Media Arm) Launches Attack
  19. ♦ Open Letter To GOPe – The Conservative Frustration
Share