Josh Earnest Says White House Doesn’t Care About Hillary Clinton Grifting Disclosures…

There’s really not much to add other than watch the video. Supposedly, according to media reports, there was a set of rules, policies and/or guidelines in place when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Those rules were supposedly drafted by the White House and required specific disclosures and compliance requirements.

Today, facing FACTUAL EVIDENCE that those rules were never followed, the White House essentially says “meh, who cares”?

This entry was posted in Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Josh Earnest Says White House Doesn’t Care About Hillary Clinton Grifting Disclosures…

  1. Father Paul Lemmen says:

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.


  2. John Galt says:

    Obozo can hardly throw stones at Hillary for influence peddling at the same time he’s trying to break the taxpayers off for $50 billion in connection with Iran Scam.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Lorra B. says:

      You said it John! This whole atrocity is mind blowing and how no criminal charges have yet to be filed in the WH is beyond me. This, too, may get swept under the WH Carpet. We need a new Soap Opera, “As The World Laughs.” And as our country seems to turn the other cheek in acceptance. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds….

      Liked by 1 person

  3. auscitizenmom says:

    My theory is still that the White Hut set her up and let her run free, knowing she would hang herself. Now, they are just sitting back and leaking info that ruins her so she can’t get elected, which is what they wanted. I don’t know who they want in her place, but I don’t think they want her in the White Hut. And, you all can feel free to make fun of me if it turns out that I am wrong. 🙄

    Liked by 4 people

    • justfactsplz says:

      I think you very well may be right.


    • Les says:

      If Obama isn’t concerned about an agreement he made with his own cabinet member, how can we trust him to make an agreement with Iran? Can you see Earnest now? “We don’t have any confirmation that it was Iran that launched the nuke against Israel. And why does it even matter?”

      Liked by 2 people

    • crazy says:

      It’s not just about the WH, it’s also about control of the Democrat party and Obama’s future. The Clinton’s set up a pretty sweet tax-free favor factory the Obam-unists are happy to let them keep as long as they understand who controls the party. The only way Hillary survives is if she recognizes the Obam-unists are in charge not the friends of Bill and Hillary. That’s why the R’s would be wise to tie both groups together as the self-serving corrupt robber barons they are.


    • PatrickSMcNally says:

      Although I don’t spend much time speculating on these things, but the thought did cross my mind that Barack Obama & George H.W. Bush may have made some sweetheart deal somewhere whereby Jeb Bush is supposed to get the White House in 2017. If you scan back over old stories you can find photos of Obama & Bush I together looking like you would expect an adopted nephew to look around his adopted uncle. One probably shouldn’t read too much into it, but still it can be tempting to hypothesize.


    • konagirl says:

      I just have not quite figured out who their “ace in the hole” player is. I know in my heart, Hillary has been burned by Obama for something she or her husband did.


      • auscitizenmom says:

        I agree, I don’t know who the ringer is. But, I think the Clintons hate Obama for taking what they considered theirs. And, he just hates them.


    • TwoLaine says:

      I think it’s been stated here before, The big-headed Oh? does not want a Dem in office after him. It would hurt his feelings too much if they criticized him and his failed policies, or lack thereof.


  4. Les says:

    “Ask Hillary how they are going to deal with it.” Like she’s the president.

    Obama’s wimmin!


  5. Pingback: Josh Earnest Says White House Doesn’t Care About Hillary Clinton Gifting Disclosures… | The Silent Soldier

  6. manickernel says:

    Grifter. Yep, that pretty much defines her.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. annieoakley says:

    Selling Uranium from the US to Russia by way of a Russian Government owned Corporation is a Grift? It really isn’t ‘her’ Uranium to sell.


  8. scott says:

    The gang that couldn’t shoot straight.


  9. revbacon says:

    He’s faced with some irrefutable evidence that she’s a crook. So instead, he starts talking about some potentially refutable evidence about his boss. And because that didn’t prove anything, he wants you to believe that this doesn’t prove anything. But, as the questioner points out, it’s right there: she took the money and didn’t disclose it. That’s the crime, not the likely crime that the two are causally linked.


  10. lovely says:

    Josh Earnest just gave a little longer version of “What difference does it make.”

    Dark days for the United States of America.


  11. bob e says:

    this guy loves gettin’ over on everyone. never breaks a sweat


  12. MaryfromMarin says:

    IMO, you can count on the fingers of one finger just what they DO care about.


  13. czarowniczy says:

    The POtuS probably doesn’t want attention drawn to the shady activities and doesn’t want any walls thrown up that might prevent him from raking in the cash once he hats up and leaves public housing. There’s probably also that thug life ideology that anyone who steals from The Man or otherwise gets over on the system is a palyuh and he and the missus will be playuhs 24/7/365 until the pipes run dry once they’re free to cash in on the chips in their bag. I think we’ll see a “Community Organizers Gone Wild’ video coming out once one the newly ex-president’s free to vacuum up those dead presidents.


  14. cosmo24 says:

    When the Obama term ends lets see how much more wealth greedy Michelle has amassed judging from her lust for “the good life” she has experienced at tax payers expense.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s