*Update* Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif Describes “The Deal” – Undercuts Obama/Kerry’s Claims Completely – *Update* Accuses Obama/Kerry Of Outright Lying In White House “Fact-Sheets”…

update-1The update is at the bottom of the page – we knew it was coming. Zarif accuses the Obama Administration of lying in the White House fact sheets being promoted by President Obama, Ben Rhodes, Valerie Jarrett, Denis McDonough. Secretary Kerry appears caught between the Truth and the White House.

Thankfully someone captured this video as it was being shared on live CNN TV.

This is Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif describing the deal. Note the nuances and divergences between Zarif and President Obama’s explanations. Understanding these is critical.

CNN abruptly stopped broadcasting the Iranian press conference at the conclusion of this segment – and cutaway to panel discussion in the middle of the presser.

The transparency of the CNN decision to hide the Iranian perspective is obvious, it undercuts the Obama explanations completely.

Zarif Presser:

• Iran keeps Frodo underground facility and will build centrifuges within it – but will not activate them.
• Iran will continue nuclear enrichment in other facilities.
• Iran will be allowed to develop more heavy water facilities.
• ALL UN and U.S. Sanctions will be lifted.
• UN sanctions lifted immediately.
• U.S. as soon as legally possible.
• Iran promises to wait 10 years until it builds a nuclear bomb.

Obama Presser:

◾ Iran will not be able to pursue a bomb containing plutonium.
◾ Current plutonium facility (heavy water) to be taken down.
◾ Current plutonium moved to (probably Russia)
◾ Installed centrifuges will be removed by 2/3
◾ No enrichment at Fordo – but fordo will remain.
◾ 10 years of extensive monitoring.
◾ Maintenance of 1 year capability to bomb.
◾ Removal of U.N. and U.S. Sanctions
◾ Congress to be fully “briefed” (*note not asking permission “deal” vs. “treaty”)

Who are you going to believe ?

Consider:

“If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan, PERIOD” !

Obama - Kaboom

The video above will not last long. Watch it quickly, copy it if you can, it will be removed because of the transparency of truth within it.

update-1UPDATE: Here’s more…

….and more….

A Big Thank You to U-Tube User LSUDVM

update-1UPDATE 6:30pm: We knew as soon as we saw the professionally produced White House “Deal Publication/Points” that something was not right. The White House outline of the “deal”, in printed form, was delivered to media just prior to the Rose Garden announcement by Obama. The points outlined do not match with the EU presser held moments before.

The Washington Free Beacon is now reporting that Zarif is decrying the White House “deal points” as complete fabrications:

[…] Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country’s leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people and Congress in a fact sheet it released following the culmination of negotiations with the Islamic Republic.

Zarif bragged in an earlier press conference with reporters that the United States had tentatively agreed to let it continue the enrichment of uranium, the key component in a nuclear bomb, as well as key nuclear research. Zarif additionally said Iran would have all sanctions lifted once a final deal is signed and that the country would not be forced to shut down any of its currently operating nuclear installations.

Following a subsequent press conference by Secretary of State John Kerry—and release of a administration fact sheet on Iranian concessions—Zarif lashed out on Twitter over what he dubbed lies. “The solutions are good for all, as they stand,” he tweeted. “There is no need to spin using ‘fact sheets’ so early on.” (read more)

Again, here’s the talking points about the Iran Deal as the White House has presented:

Zarif calls these points “lies” !! 

This entry was posted in A New America, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Dear Leader - Creepy POTUS Worship, Dem Hypocrisy, European Union, Iran, Islam, Israel, media bias, Notorious Liars, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

75 Responses to *Update* Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif Describes “The Deal” – Undercuts Obama/Kerry’s Claims Completely – *Update* Accuses Obama/Kerry Of Outright Lying In White House “Fact-Sheets”…

  1. John Galt says:

    658 more days of stalling remain.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. racerxx says:

    So basically Iran gets all the sanctions lifted for giving up nothing. Great deal..

    Liked by 2 people

  3. sundance says:

    Update: More of the presser

    Like

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      I knew that Obama was trying to Screw America but My Good Lord.
      I shared this with a FB conservative forum…
      Thanks Sundance for the great reporting.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Murse says:

      I don’t understand the political reason for Iran to undercut Obama when he is giving them what they want. What am I missing here?

      Like

      • lorac says:

        They might be seeing up the road that as they go along their way developing it, an inspector or someone calls them out as if they’re doing something wrong. If they hadn’t said anything now about the conflicting ideas about the “deal”, the whole world would punish them for breaking the deal – because the world had only seen the White House talking points about the deal. Maybe the Iranians realized Obama was setting them up, giving them what they want, but leaving them vulnerable to “getting in trouble” anytime he wants.

        Like

  4. sundance says:

    Like

  5. Pat B. says:

    John Earnest is on CNN right now talking about how they don’t want Congress to remove sanctions right away and a “wait and let’s see” approach about that. He sounds like he
    might be auditioning for an analyst job at CNN. I wonder if he is on the outs.

    There is no deal signed so essentially it’s gossip. The Kirk Amendment gives them
    to June 30 to get a signed deal or no sanctions will be removed.

    Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      The sanctions do not amount to a hill of beans. This is not about that.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Pat B. says:

      Oops..I meant to say John Earnet.

      Like

    • lorac says:

      So Congress has to sign off on ending the sanctions? But Obama doesn’t want Congress having a vote on the deal in entirety, which would make it a legal treaty. Would Congress participate in the deal, instead of insisting Obama do it right, and put the whole thing to a vote? If so, I think it’s another case of Congress not having a spine.

      Like

  6. CrankyinAZ says:

    We are so screwed…. Unbelievable. I can hardly believe this is actually happening… and that the US govt is pushing this through.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. waltherppk says:

    Liked by 2 people

  8. lovely says:

    Obama kissed their ass, massaged their feet, rubbed their heads, cleaned their sandals, and still the Iranians spit right in Obama’s face.

    Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-accuses-u-s-of-lying-about-new-nuke-agreement/

    What an ignorant arrogant clown that POTUS is.

    Like

  9. rashomon says:

    Bergdahl II. A whole bunch of dangerous stuff in trade for zero. Our prez is making a habit outta this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sharon says:

      It’s not a habit. It’s a plan.

      Liked by 2 people

      • rashomon says:

        Frankly, Sharon, he’s gone beyond the realm of man-with-a-plan. He’s just a kid out of school with too much power and, really, no interest in using his leisure time to make a plan. Let the JV do it. What the heck. Every action he took in Illinois smacked of the same ego-centric narcissism that has now gone full blown.

        When Hollande threw up his hands, it signaled serious problems as I don’t think M. Hollande is dealing with a full deck either. After all, the French, too, took part in blowing up Libya. I wasn’t a big fan of the Bush administration’s attack on Iraq, but our prez has carried “destabilization” into new territory. Perhaps we have the fodder for a new computer game: who, what and how to blow up the world in the fewest steps. The ultimate chess game.

        Like

  10. czarowniczy says:

    Oh No, I was talking about Frodo al Baggins, he works 3rd shift in our Shire-ea compliant research facility. Ahhh…English…such a fungible language when it comes to lying.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. James F says:

    Either Obama really sucks at being a trader or he really excels at being a traitor.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Dawg says:

    ~~ President Ear Leader said we would know when Iran cheats and believes he and
    SoS Lurch has negotiated a great deal for America and the Middle East…
    I guess when we see Israel or parts of America blown all to (he**) kingdom come we can say, well the Mullahs have cheated just like Bathhouse Barry told us..~~

    Like

  13. Sharon says:

    The spokesman for our Islamic enemy is very comfortable in English and well-spoken in terms of easy reference to details, governmental entities, dates, and documents. I am just finishing watching the third video and have yet to hear one obvious evasion or “uhhhh……” or smirky refusal to speak plainly. This man is confident at all levels.

    👿

    He obviously is very comfortable being in the bright lights.

    They are on the ascent, make no mistake, and with the traitors and ignorant of other nations paving the way for them, led by the US, they will only pick up speed. They will be comfortable with more and more obvious (even to the dull American public) manifestations of the inroads they have already made across our nation.

    The secret cells of Islamists within our borders are not all dealing with explosives. Some of them are placed within YMCAs, churches, town councils, fire departments, and 501(c)3s. As they begin to assert the authority they have within their current spheres of influence they won’t have to “be ugly” about it.

    They will only have to rest their considerable offensive weight against the nearest tottering wall. Our current PC environment will be an effective force multiplier for them.

    Liked by 3 people

    • smiley says:

      good post, Sharon

      Liked by 1 person

    • rashomon says:

      Well stated, Sharon. I don’t understand this capture about “democracy.” Democracy is mob rule plus one vote — easily manipulated in so many different environs. Islam is totalitarianism taken to an extreme. Why are we protecting either one of these forms of government?

      I guess Indiana and Arkansas just fold when confronted by mobs objecting to laws that are, simply, protecting their rights to ruled by others. So sad. So glad Arkansas’ governor responded to his kid objecting to the original bill. This is so trying…and exhausting. These kids don’t even know why they are rallying.

      Like

      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        The wendy davis filibuster in Texas was also a mob-rules event. her filibuster was ended by parliamentary procedures at a point leaving 15 minutes for a vote to enact the abortion bill.

        So, her efforts was about to fail literally in the 11 th hour.

        However, the astroturf protesters began hollering and cheering and chanting. The noise level was so great that the texas legislature could not normally conduct business.

        Time ran out and the bill failed to pass, as it would have.

        So, a loud mob interfered with regular proceedings of Texas.

        When this is noted to the progressives, they argue back that it was democracy – finally the state legislature behaving according to the will of the people.

        The proof that the bill would have been approved was that it was rapidly approved in a quickly-assembled special session right after the regular legislative session ended.

        Mob rules. Progressives are not bothered about it, but rather think it is a good thing.

        Like

  14. Bill O Rights says:

    So how long before the Saudis and Egypt go nuclear? They saw the value of our guarantees when we abandon the Ukrainians.

    The paradox of progressivism: the outcome of a progressive program will be the opposite of the stated objective. He wants to end nuclear weapons so now the whole middle east goes nuclear.

    Like

  15. Dawg says:

    ~~ President Ear Leader said we would know when Iran cheats and believes he
    and SoS Lurch has negotiated a great deal for America and the Middle East…
    I guess when we see Israel or parts of America blown all to (he**) kingdom come we can say,
    the Mullahs have cheated just like Bathhouse Barry told us..~~

    Like

  16. sundance says:

    Evidence surfaces that THOSE “White House Action Points” about the deal were constructed prior to the end of the negotiations.

    That explains why A.) They were false, and, B.) why no-one was talking (see video)

    This is absolutely McDonough/Jarret maneuvering.

    The “Deal Action Points” that Obama delivered in the Rose Garden were typed into his teleprompter and he recited them. There’s nothing in those points that is accurate as far as the actual agreement being discussed or negotiated in Switzerland.

    Pure parseltongue.

    This is exactly how this White House rolls.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. crazy says:

    The only thing agreed on is that both sides would make an announcement claiming victory. Could have done that anytime over the last 6 years.

    Like

  18. doodahdaze says:

    The musings of a total Obamniac for your info.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/02/obama-iran-deal_n_6995758.html

    Like

  19. rashomon says:

    Yes, we forget that Yemen’s ports are the gateway to moving product, arms and other essentials. What a stew we have encouraged. This most-deranged country has now become a major player.

    Some of the Treepers with experience in this field can comment with more insight.

    Like

  20. Millwright says:

    Thirty-odd years’ back we were hard at work in TN on development of a nuclear power reactor that didn’t require – or produce – “nuclear weapon grade by product”. IPOF it could consume it ! Its “spent fuel” end product was relatively low-grade short-term isotopes easily stored. That reactor ran for some 20K hours without problems. It was “killed” by the DOE. Why?

    While its seemed unimportant at the time, think what it would mean in the ME today, If the USG “donated” this design to militant nations demanding access to nuclear power they would have little standing on the world stage to proclaim their “peaceful use” of more militant technologies. The world is awash with high-density weapons grade nuclear material. But multiple designs exist to use this fuel for peaceful purposes, while rendering it unsuitable for weaponeering.

    Our “Fourth Estate”, has long aped the “three monkeys” on this issue as they have on so many others. Its long past time americans use the freedom of internet – while we still have it – to discuss these critical issues and demand our political representatives respond. >MW

    Like

  21. moe ham head says:

    they want a bomb so bad lets give them a couple
    from 30000 feet

    Like

  22. ches1 says:

    Anybody who believes obama over Iran is a fool.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s