Iran Nuclear Deal Talks Extended…

kerry iran

LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program have been extended until Wednesday, the State Department said Tuesday.

A few hours before the self-imposed midnight Tuesday deadline ran out, State Department acting Spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters, ‎”We’ve made enough progress in the last days to merit staying until Wednesday. There are several difficult issues still remaining.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is returning to Lausanne from Russia, indicating an end to the talks is near. He left Lausanne on Monday but had said he would return if a deal were imminent.

Outstanding issues include a how much research and development Iran would be able to conduct in the last five years of the agreement, when the country would be allowed to enrich its uranium to higher levels, and how to expose of Iran’s existing nuclear stockpile. (read more)

This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Dear Leader - Creepy POTUS Worship, Iran, Islam, Israel, Jihad, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Iran Nuclear Deal Talks Extended…

  1. ctmom says:

    “There are several difficult issues still remaining,” says Harf in announcing extension of tonight’s Iran nuke talks deadline.” Let me guess. Iran wants US to announce we are going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. John Galt says:

    Iran is not complying with the current nuclear deal, so protracted negotiations for another deal make no sense.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. WeeWeed says:

    Liked by 5 people

  4. nimrodman says:

    Sundance – I thought the timeline of dated quotes in your Feb 21 post was very effective at illustrating the multi-year dithering and delay that’s gone on.

    Any chance you’d be able to update it with events since then, and give it it’s own topical headline? Including more inept quotes and former strong negotiating positions that have since been caved on?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. lovely says:

    I have nothing to add to this thread that would not depress me further so I will simply say that I think the photo that accompanies this thread is the most appropriate photo I have ever seen to grace any thread here.


  6. czarowniczy says:

    It never fails to amuse me how the nation that developed and was the first to use the fission and fusion bombs has been so hypocritically complicit in its spread to good-ish and bad guys alike.


  7. Jackson says:

    Seems the negotiations are moving into the “When Iran Can Have a Nuke” phase..


  8. doodahdaze says:

    Watching the nitwit Libs this morning is just too much. How can people be this stupid.


  9. moe ham head says:

    gee didnt see this coming
    i wonder if the treaty will be written on clintons server?


  10. archer52 says:

    As I have pointed out before, and it is now getting traction, Obama is following a plan outlined by James Baker, who is no friend of Israel.

    Here is the link to my site, and the link to the article explaining the plan. In a nutshell Obama wants to get Iran to be the huge counterweight and regional leader in the Middle East. Why is a big question, and I’m sure there are many answers.

    Read up. Then you will go “Ahhh hah!’ and move on.

    Obama is president…TWICE! Like Carter he can screw up our foreign policy for thirty years and that’s the way it is.

    This time though he just started a nuclear arms race withing a group of people who embrace apocalyptic outcomes.


    Liked by 1 person

  11. yakmaster2 says:

    It appears that Obama and his minions are as addicted to their world transformational ideology as crack addicts. As long as Iran dangles the possibility of a big supply of
    It, they’re gonna be in that room—waiting, scratching, twitching and jonesing. Pathetic and horrifying.


  12. Roy says:

    “There are several difficult issues still remaining.””

    Bigger than the non-negotiable destruction of Israel?

    If THAT doesn’t stop this faux peace agreement process cold, then BO and Kerry must actively WANT Israel’s destruction. Is that what the rest of the negotiators wants also? Why hasn’t even one country involved blown the horn on that?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s