Judge Orders State Dept To Comply With Records Request…

Hillary clinton shoe duck 1(Via New York Times) A federal judge on Friday ruled on behalf of Citizens United, a conservative advocacy group, in its lawsuit against the State Department for documents related to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure there.

Judge Gladys Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the State Department to produce passenger manifests from 47 overseas trips that Mrs. Clinton made as secretary of state. Citizens United requested the manifests last July through a Freedom of Information Act Request.

The State Department, the judge wrote, must release the first batch of records by April 3, with more being released every two weeks; all the documents must be given to the group no later than Aug. 1.

The group requested the flight manifests to examine whether Clinton Foundation donors had accompanied Mrs. Clinton on State Department trips.

“Clearly, the State Department is not getting the benefit of the doubt from judges anymore,” David N. Bossie, president of Citizens United. said Friday.

A State Department spokeswomen did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (read more)


This entry was posted in Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

40 Responses to Judge Orders State Dept To Comply With Records Request…

  1. doodahdaze says:

    THIS! Is my points.


    • John Galt says:

      Senior status Clinton appointed judge known for an inability to think clearly. Don’t get your hopes up.


      “The court was wrong, and clearly so.”

      “We do not say that any of these particular pieces of evidence are conclusive, but we do say that they add to the weight of the government’s case against Al-Adahi and that the district court clearly erred in tossing them aside.”

      “One of the oddest things about this case is that despite an extensive record and numerous factual disputes, the district court never made any findings about whether Al-Adahi was generally a credible witness or whether his particular explanations for his actions were worthy of belief. The court’s omissions are particularly striking in light of the instructions in al-Qaida’s training manuals for resisting interrogation.”

      “We could go on, but what we have written thus far is enough to show that the district court clearly erred in its treatment of the evidence and in its view of the law.”


    • xschild says:

      Dwell long on first picture. Gollum searching for lost Preciousss. This is who Demo’s want to run country for next two POTUS cycles. Slick Willie could not match this woman.
      Deviant. Am I amazed at the red diaper babies running our government? No.


  2. myopiafree says:

    One question: Does she look like a good president? Does she hide the truth? Is she open and honest. Does she do – what she has accused others of having done (i.e., hiding emails, etc.) You want this type of arrogant person for president? Not me.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. auscitizenmom says:

    I guess Obozo and ValJar authorized the judge to demand the records.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Piggs says:

    Great! Maybe bring Hillary down a little may just make others in Gov to start complying with our laws. At least I can still dream.


  5. yakmaster2 says:

    The upcoming drips are bound to be detrimental to Dame Hilary’s campaign. She and her minions can yell ‘right wing conspiracy’ all they want, but that will only remind folks that she made that same excuse during all her and Bill’s myriad scandals. With several different organizations going after her emails, this ought to be good!

    Liked by 2 people

    • BertDilbert says:

      “With several different organizations going after her emails, this ought to be good!”

      From what I gather she has turned everything over to the State dept except for her personal e mails which she says she deleated. Therefore the State dept will have to turn over any e mails because she no longer has any! See how this works? She no longer has to produce anything. Anything not turned over now belongs to the State dept.


      • BertDilbert says:

        And the deleting she delegated to her lawyer so her hands are clean. If there was a “mistake”, it was an honest one by the lawyer team…


      • BitterC says:

        Right and Psaki has already said it will take State MONTHS to review and REDACT CLASSIFIED INFO (tho Hill said she didn’t email classified info) before they can release the emails. Slow rolling at it’s finest, Clinton style.


        • yakmaster2 says:

          The months it’s gonna take for the various new State Dept.FOIA requests coming from mutiple organizations is the slow drip I’m talking about. Some of these requests are not coming from folks on the Right (the Associated Press, for example) so the accumulation of these efforts and the frustrations concerning the ‘slow walking’ obfuscations from State will add weight to this scandal.


      • Sentient says:

        If she’s deleted her personal stuff, there’s no reason she shouldn’t hand over the server.


    • jeanmarc8 says:

      Some potential land mines for Hillary in the email review process:
      1. Any classified material in the emails, or material that should have been classified. The unclassified and classified systems have to be kept separate. See handling of General David Petraeus US Army (retired), who plead guilty to a misdemeanor for mishandling classified material. But even the SECSTATE travel plans can be classified, particularly for overseas travel, for security reasons. That is generally why things are kept on the high side, while she apparently did not maintain such electronic access.
      2. Any documentation for emails that were not provided. For example, an email that was not provided from person 2, when there is an email from person #1 to Hillary which references a previous message from Person #2 to both of them. The answer can’t be “I guess we inadvertently deleted it”. That is why the block delete method can cause problems. This will take people to cross check the emails one by one. Probably why the information was sent by paper rather than electronic media, since it will be harder to do manually. But it can be done, and it won’t take missing emails to be a big problem.
      3. Inability to provide a copy of the document for the briefing for the end of access to classified material (there is a name for it, but I don’t recall it). If the briefing was done and documented, Hillary would have pulled it out already, so the bet is that it was not done. Evidence for “Not required for a Clinton and future President”. Also an embarrassment to the President, since it was his responsibility as well.
      4. Evidence for embarrassing connections/overlap between the Clinton Foundation and Hillary’s work as SECSTATE. The presence of much of a connection would allow Congress to subpoena all the files from the Clinton Foundation., like donor lists, meeting records, etc. Even Bill could be dragged into that inquiry for more clarification on the meaning of “is”, or perhaps “was”.
      Again, IANAL.


      • auscitizenmom says:

        Our only hope, truly, is that Obozo and ValJar are encouraging this and will not interfere with this investigation. I think there is enough to sink the Clinton’s, the question is whether the information can be dug out.


  6. justfactsplz says:

    That picture depicts her very well, as a wicked woman. She has a queen mentality and needs to be taken down a notch or two. Sunlight will be what brings her down.


  7. texan59 says:


    Liked by 1 person

  8. TexasRanger says:

    Is Hillary Clinton Going to Slide Through Every Scandal That Surfaces?

    Zo sets the record straight Why Hillary’s “email gate” Will Not Harm Her.

    This is All That Really Matters.!

    Liked by 1 person

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Love Zo. 🙂


    • Justice_099 says:

      I do take issue with his point at the end. The public has been conditioned to believe the liberal way is just ‘normal.’ If you say ANYTHING not in line with the liberal view, they are automatically conditioned to view it as extremist, hateful, bigotted, and evil. Even supposedly conservative people are sucked into this. In fact, I think his last point is an expression of that. He says the way the message is being delivered doesn’t have salt. It’s impossible now.

      I a world filled with lies, the truth becomes revolutionary. And that is the plight. USA loving people will always need to speak against what has become ‘normal’, because the ‘normal’ is wrong.

      Most republicans I come across are no more smarter than the liberals. They are just as dumb and just as indoctrinated. Right now, on FB, my aunt is ranting about them taking prayer out of schools and angry because they are removing religious symbols from public places, and angry because they are taking the American flags out of the schools. She posts about supporting police and our troops, about gun rights, and even about illegal immigrants, etc….

      But she also posts repeatedly how great of a President Obama is and always votes democrat and defends democrat politicians.

      How could you EVER say anything at all that will relate to people like that?


      • strat4evr says:

        Those who consistently vote democrat yet complain about issues that are directly a consequence of a liberal ideology, you will never say anything that will possibly relate. And I agree nowdays people who consistently vote republican offers no assurance of not being just as dumb and “indoctrinated”. It really is sometimes just a choice of the lesser of two evils.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s