Cowardice – Sky News U.K. Has A Splodey Head When Critical Pundit Shows Cover of Charlie Hebdo Magazine…

[…]  ..”There are times for self-restraint, but in the immediate wake of the most threatening assault on journalism in living memory, you would have served the cause of free expression best by engaging in it”.  (source)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Terrorist Attacks, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Cowardice – Sky News U.K. Has A Splodey Head When Critical Pundit Shows Cover of Charlie Hebdo Magazine…

  1. lovemygirl says:

    Was that UK anchor Muslim per chance? She had a darker complexion as if Mid Eastern.

    Like

  2. LetJusticePrevail" says:

    After the slaughter at Charlie Hebdo, every news organization in the world should have blazed that cover in their headline story every day for at least a solid week.

    Let the Muslims chew on THAT.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. yakmaster2 says:

    What a bunch of hypocritical wussies! Oh, and count CNN and other US news organizations among them.
    Such “journalists” are part of the terror problem. They refuse to express how ridiculous it is for Muslims to be so offended by pictures of their favorite prophet. Are Muslims also offended by depictions of Jesus, Moses, or even God?
    These same talking heads and print pundits would not hesitate to show “art” blaspheming Jesus. And cartoons and movies that poke fun at God are also perfectly acceptable in their world. But offend a Muslim, never!, because those billion Muslims are sooo oppressed.

    (Thanks for letting me get THAT off my chest.)

    Liked by 3 people

  4. James F says:

    I am WAY more offended by unnecessary censorship, double standards and pandering to islamic terrorists.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Lee says:

    So…apparently the terrorist won, again. And, again, their partner in crime – the MEDIA.

    Liked by 6 people

    • doodahdaze says:

      And Obama. He just sent AQ reinforcements from Gitmo.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Lorra B. says:

      When will the Media grow a pair and report the NEWS in it’s truth and entirety? Since when, (Perhaps Obama?) have our media coward to the government? Yes, that was a rhetorical question. The media is helping to destroy the future of this country and that of our children by allowing themselves to be censored. Just want to walk up and B****-Slap them! Grrrr 🙂

      Like

  6. auscitizenmom says:

    I agree with the comments here. But, I have to admit i had a good laugh at that so-called reporter. Her quick, over-reaction was pretty funny.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. amwick says:

    Funny thing is the local news down here showed the cover page like it was nothing. Just a brief mention. And then right on to high school sports.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. MrRight says:

    That reporter seemed so pissed off… And felt that she had to apologize to terrorist. Sick.
    England, you have reached a new low. This human social cancer will spread if its not stopped, is it not evident by now? ( they have unlimited fund, and will to conquer )

    I’m also bewildered that in my local area 2 mulsim group have been formed in the past 5 years, and on is already broke ground on a new mosque , the other assembling funds to build another.

    Btw: sky news pretty much got arabic commercial every 5 minutes, so no wonder that they are censoring news and are anti western values.

    Greedy cowards

    Liked by 2 people

  9. lovemygirl says:

    Can we get back to the ugly AmeRican role where we don’t came who we offended. I rather enjoyed being rude and boorish. 😉

    Liked by 3 people

  10. czarowniczy says:

    The rejoinder by the British Ministry of Gratuitous Apologies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FPELc1wEvk

    (yes, anothert YouTube clip – the event has already occurred, nothing we can do about it, but if we drown it with sarcasm and ridicule perhaps the perps will think (gratuitous presumption that the even think) twice next time before they do this.

    Like

    • czarowniczy says:

      BTW, does that reporter look….British?

      Like

      • bogeytct says:

        Her name is Dharshini David and is of Sri Lankan Tamil per online bio. Born in London in 1973 she is western educated.

        Tamils are majority Hindu with minority Christian and Muslim.

        Like

        • czarowniczy says:

          Actually neither look as Brit as my Brit grandmother but Britain’s inheriting that penance resulting from hundreds of years of colonial expansion that imploded into white guilt at the end. We just did the Brits one better when it comes to culturally drowning under a wave of immigration – we don’t require Commonwealth passports. Yes, I know, we’re a ‘nation in immigrants’ and I still have my relatives’ visas, written guarantees from other family members that they will not end up on the public dole and naturalization papers saying they too k classes on American history and culture and passed a test.
          I also did some work on the Tamil Eelam – that’s multiculturalism.

          Like

          • wondering999 says:

            A Sri Lankan student once gave a class presentation on her country’s civil war that made for intersting history. She said that the Sri Lankans wouldn’t work on British plantations, so the British colonialists imported massive numbers of Muslim workers from the Indian state of Tamil Nadu who WOULD get the plantation work done. Fast forward; they all spoke English and were getting along just fine until a Sri Lankan leader decided that they should revert to native Sri Lankan language. Tamils of course did not speak that language (although they spoke English) and were thrown out of government jobs because of the new language requirement. Moral of story: keep a common language and don’t change that language.

            Like

      • elvischupacabra says:

        The only people left in the UK who “look British” are the Poles who have flocked there in recent years looking for work.

        Liked by 4 people

        • czarowniczy says:

          Yeah, the ‘Polish plumber’ of Brit white racism. Gazillions of Mideastern, subcontinent Asians flooding in through the chunnel and they were sweating Polish plumbers.

          Liked by 1 person

          • ytz4mee says:

            The real fun starts when the ability to endlessly print fiat money ends, and the State actually has to levy and collect taxes from real value to fund themselves. The limitless welfare bennies for the non-productive will hit a brick wall. Can’t wait.

            Like

            • czarowniczy says:

              If they find some way to cut the Royal family back to a Polish plumber’s wage and leverage all of the US holdings the Royal family has they could probably keep the Pound afloat for a few more food stamp cycles. Ugh – there’s a thought, British Food Stamps. State sponsored boiled, grey food. Yes, I grew up on it part of the time.

              Like

        • czarowniczy says:

          Speaking of which, Fox had a nice discussion of Liam Neeson and Taken 3. During a conference Neeson called gun ownership in teh Us a ‘disgrace’ while defending his gratuitous lead slinging in Taken 3 that earned him some $20-million. I like Fox commentators’ comments that ordinary folks here can’t afford the armed bodyguards that the Hollyork likes of Neeson cam and, in particular, the commentator who stated outright that she’s sick and tired of Irish and British stars coming to the US to make far, far , FAR more money then they can in Great Brit while trashing our Constitution.I found it particularly interesting that Neeson, supporter of Ireland extraordinaire, would fail to mention the IRA’s gun and bomb collection. Then again, I guess it;’s pau-tay-tuh, potahtoe.

          Like

          • ytz4mee says:

            I think every celebutard who advocates for gun control should also give up their right to gun access, including tangentially through their body guards. That of course, includes the Feinsteins and Obamas of the world. If citizens – all citizens – aren’t entitled to the same access to self-defense, then there is no need for the Secret Service.

            Liked by 2 people

            • czarowniczy says:

              If you look at the private security firms that support the Hollyork celeberatti you’ll see it’s a quiet growth business. More than a few armed security services in NOLA that provide deadly-force protection to celebs and other better-than-you-are personalities here to rub shoulders with carefully selected and cleaned mere mortals. I think the anti-gun celebs should be turned loose in public housing, unarmed and unprotected, at 1 AM on a Saturday morning with $100 bills or a Big Macs, your choice, pinned to their lapels. Let them meat…meet…their adoring public..

              Liked by 4 people

  11. elvischupacabra says:

    Every time a talking head on TV says the word “offended” they should get an electric jolt in the rear end. Lose that word in conjunction with the Fourth Estate.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bogeytct says:

      They don’t know what offense it. If you have to think about it, it’s not offensive.

      People on the left are perpetually feigning offense. Muslims jumped onto the bandwagon because they saw it work.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ytz4mee says:

        Yes. And they demand that we not only “tolerate” but accept their viewpoint without question, while demanding that counter-viewpoints be suppressed.

        Every single Prog that has wandered through here eventually gets around to trying to suppress the comments and viewpoints of others. Every. single. one. I’ve had it.

        There’s a big difference between replying, “I don’t agree with your viewpoint” and demanding someone not be “allowed” to say something. (a) is okay, (b) is NOT.

        There are many things I approve out of moderation that I don’t “approve” of. Just because a comment is posted doesn’t mean we agree with it. But we agree with the concept of freedom, including the right to offend unless it reaches the point of deliberatively baiting/trolling. We only try to moderate speech that is profanity.

        Liked by 4 people

  12. Tkim says:

    We should start our own group, those who believe there is no such thing as offense, so when any group claims to be offended they are mocking our beliefs. Their heads won’t just get splodey, they’ll erupt from the rump up.

    (“You can’t just SAY there’s no such thing as offense! ” Well pray tell why not, Vassar undergrad. We have all day…)

    Liked by 3 people

  13. They should print Moo’s face on every bit of toilet paper.

    Like

  14. doodahdaze says:

    Hey Hey Ho Ho PC Civ has got to go.

    Like

  15. John Denney says:

    If you value the truth, you value freedom of speech.

    Like

  16. Darby O'Gill says:

    Qatar Airways has ongoing sponsorship deal with Sky News. Showing cartoons of the “prophet” on screen bulletins would send the sponsors into a Ragin’ Fury.

    Like

  17. Cowards! Reprehensible chicken-s**t cowards…all that take a similar stance in the face of the 1.6 B muslim cowards around the world.

    Like

  18. Sandra says:

    Hahaha “We’re sorry if we offended anyone, please don’t kill me”

    Like

  19. partyzantski says:

    Ok, that offends the Brits?
    Know what offends ME???
    British “teeth”. Seriously… the diastema, the gaps, the uneveness of it all is unsettling.

    Full disclosure – I am no stranger to the dental chair and I thank God for my maxillofacial surgical team. They made even me look good.

    Like

  20. GiGi says:

    @vin1vid1vic1~

    “There will always be evil and evil seeks destruction. What seems senseless is in fact, evil. Evil wears many faces and hides in darkness.”

    Evil wears the face of our lover, our friend, our neighbor, our teacher, our doctor, our sheriff, our governor, our president. Only rarely does it wear the face of the stranger who jumps out of the shadows. But in any form, it is evil personified.

    Like

Leave a Reply to yakmaster2 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s