Desperately Seeking Dee Dee- “A Paramout Significants”
In 2012 the same CNN network now trying to gin up racial animus around the Mike Brown shooting was proclaiming George Zimmerman to have announced “f**king coons” via phone with a 911 dispatcher as he watched Trayvon Martin disappear behind a building.
Did George Zimmerman say “f**king coons“, of course not.
Two weeks later CNN changed their mind, but not before they spent hundreds of on-air hours debating the racial mindset of Zimmerman.
Fast forward to 2014, the Mike Brown shooting, and you find a similar approach by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon and their various panel guests including Sonni Hostin and Marc Lamont.
Desperately Seeking Dee Dee – In 2012 Parks and Crump needed a witness to get to second base, the arrest. Absent of evidence they created a witness to support their demands, an arrest. They need the arrest to establish ‘probable cause’ for their wrongful death lawsuits.
That is THE ONLY reason they are demanding an arrest – PERIOD!
In 2014 Parks and Crump are working desperately to find their modern “Dee Dee” witness, and why CNN continues to assist them is a very odd, yet ideologically aligned, dynamic.
Last week we discovered Kevin Christopher Seltzer (DOB 4/26/84), a resident of the Canfield Gardens apartment complex who had uploaded several video segments to his various social media.
Coincidentally, 30-year-old Mr. Seltzer, a convicted felon, had served prison time for various criminal infractions in Broward County Florida, home of the aforementioned Trayvon Scheme Team.
Natalie Jackson, Benjamin Crump, Daryl Parks – FLORIDA, 2012
Around five days ago Mr. Seltzer was in communication with the Scheme Team partner Natalie Jackson. Natalie Jackson was the locally racist Sanford Florida attorney whose business model needs racial divisions and lawsuits – She became the on-the-ground scheme partner to Parks and Crump.
Soon after contact Mr. Seltzer began scrubbing his social media (twitter and instagram) and locking down from public visibility/scrutiny. We watched the conversations with the scheme team. Yesterday the reasoning became clear.
Mr. Seltzer is the Canfield Greens resident whose video you are seeing aired on CNN to support the claim that Big Mike Brown held his hands up prior to the shooting.
2012’s “Fucking Coons“, has been modified to 2014’s “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot“.
Two construction workers, who are “anonymous” – for obvious reasons (GO FIGURE) are being positioned to be the 2014 verion(s) of Dee Dee, (aka 2012’s Rachel Jeantel, witness #8, also “anonymous” for obvious reasons):
(CNN) — Two men, shocked at what they saw, describe an unarmed teenager with his hands up in the air as he’s gunned down by a police officer.
They were contractors doing construction work in Ferguson, Missouri, on the day Michael Brown was killed.
And the men, who asked not to be identified after CNN contacted them, said they were about 50 feet away from Officer Darren Wilson when he opened fire.
An exclusive cell phone video captures their reactions during the moments just after the shooting.
The cop didn’t say get on the ground. He just kept shooting,” the man said.
That same witness described the gruesome scene, saying he saw Brown’s “brains come out of his head,” again stating, “his hands were up.”
The video shows the man raising his arms in the air — just as, he says, Brown was doing when he was shot.
The other contractor told CNN he saw Brown running away from a police car.
Brown “put his hands up,” the construction worker said, and “the officer was chasing him.”
The contractor says he saw Wilson fire a shot at Brown while his back was turned.
The men said they didn’t seen how the confrontation started. (read more)
Of course, as with “Dee Dee” the anonymity plays well for the scheme team (Parks, Crump, Jackson/Gray) goals. Anonymity stops scrutiny in further media discussion.
As with all structural lies and deception, anonymity facilitates the ruse.
Looking at the new witnesses, which are not actually new because the LA Times interviewed Kevin Seltzer (aka Christopher_4_26, aka Yung anias) on August 15th, you’ll note a few general aspects which, just like Tiffany Mitchell and Piaget Crenshaw, contradict each other.
According to the CNN propaganda the construction workers claim to be “50 feet” from the shooting. CNN mistake #1, actually there is an unattributed statement from the construction crew saying approximately 50 yards (150 ft). However, even that is seriously flawed.
The actual “anonymous” construction workers were 220+ feet away from the shooting.
That would be a difference of 170 feet from the claim in the CNN article, or almost 4 times as far.
Oh well, the “Fucking Coons” continues….
And if you actually look at the location you can clearly see the building where Piaget Crenshaw’s apartment is located is directly blocking their view for most of the event.
You can also notice the blocked view in the actual video CNN is displaying.
However, if you are unfamiliar with the entire scene it appears they are closer because of the optical illusion created by the iPad doing the recording which was located in the basement apartment at the time.
You might also note that CNN is only airing an edited segment of the video uploaded by Kevin C Seltzer. They are also looping the “hands up aspect” for obvious reasons.
For the full segment of the video, as well as an understanding of the ideology behind felonious Mr. Seltzer himself, you can watch it below: (@1:55 – 2:09)
The primary take-aways are these:
• Attorney’s Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump NEED Darren Wilson arrested in order to get paid (lawsuits)
• Daryl Parks and Ben Crump will follow their previous playbook and manufacture media evidence to get that arrest.
• CNN in 2014, just like CNN 2012, will assist Parks/Crump in a public display of the manufactured evidence they create.
• All of the manufactured evidence is for public opinion consumption only. None of it would hold up to scrutiny in a courtroom.
Little, if any, of the currently debated evidence in the media is even remotely consistent.
Here’s an example of witness inconsistency:
The REAL evidentiary issue has never been whether or not Big Mike Brown at one point or another “put his hands in the air“, perhaps he did.
The actual and legal question is: Did “Big Mike Brown”, advance toward Officer Wilson, in a threatening manner, when he finally stopped running and turned around?
And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. (link)
Did Officer Wilson retreat while Big Mike was advancing toward him in a threatening manner while saying “what you gonna do, shoot me“?…. and then charge?
Looking at the known evidence from witnesses as well as physical evidence at the scene it certainly looks like Mike Brown was moving forward and Darren Wilson was moving backward.
Brown was shot in the front.
Brown was shot facing Wilson.
WITNESS (6:05 – 6:08): They just walked right past me when I was going, coming out the house [inaudible].
WITNESS (6:10 – 6:12): [Inaudible] I mean [inaudible] I went back in –
QUESTIONER (6:12): That’s the one –
WITNESS (6:13 – 6:18): That’s the one that ran behind this right here, ‘cause he ran up there where we was at, where we live at.
WITNESS (6:19 – 6:20): Now I was, when I came back outside –
Key Element – It appears, as witness was coming out of his house, he saw Mike Brown and Dorian Johnson just walking, he then went back inside for a minute, and when he came back out the confrontation had begun.
WITNESS (6:20 – 6:26): – all I seen was the police in that truck right there. Dudes – I don’t know what happened [inaudible] –
QUESTIONER (6:26): So whose hat is that right there?
WITNESS (6:27 – 6:29): That’s his hat, I don’t know what happened –
QUESTIONER (6:29 – 6:30): How’d he get from there to here?
WITNESS (6:30 – 6:33): ‘Cause he ran. The police was still in the truck.
QUESTIONER (6:33): They came this way?
WITNESS (6:34 – 6:40): Naw, he was right there, the police was still in the truck. He’s like, I don’t know, he was kinda pushing with his hands [inaudible] he was in that truck.
QUESTIONER (6:38 – 6:40, crosstalk with last part of above): Running this way →? Why his body come this way ←though?
Key Element – the questioner is asking if Mike Brown was running East, why is his body facing West?
WITNESS (6:41 – 6:47): Him and the police, yeah him and the police, I mean the police was in the truck. He was like over the truck right, now.
WITNESS (6:47 – 6:51): But [“cause”] then he ran. Police got out and ran after him [inaudible].
Key Element – the Witness is stating Officer Wilson and Mike Brown both initially headed East
WITNESS (6:51 – 6:55): Then the next thing I know, he coming back towards the police. The police had his gun drawn already.
QUESTIONER (6:56 – 6:57): Oh, the police dropped the son?
Key Element – the witness is stating Mike Brown stopped, turned and began coming back toward officer Wilson who had his gun drawn. *Note* No gun fire prior to Mike Brown turning around – no shots toward the back.
WITNESS (6:57 – 7:05): Yeah the police shot him. The police kept dumping him, and I’m thinking that the police missing like, he’s like, police was like this far from him.
WITNESS (7:06 – 7:12): And I’m thinking [inaudible], at least, at least 5 shots. Next thing I know, I think he’s missing.
Key Element – Witness implying Officer Wilson and Mike Brown close in proximity when he observes initial volley of gunfire. Witness sounds incredulous because from his perspective officer Wilson should not be missing at the distance he’s observing.
QUESTIONER (7:12 – 7:14): The police shoot the dude?
WITNESS (7:14 – 7:17): The police shot him. Next thing I know, I think he’s missing.
WITNESS (7:18 – 7:21): He, then dude started running, kept coming toward the police.
Key Element – Witness is stating *AFTER* first volley of shots, we know to be six, Mike Brown then started “running”, “coming toward” officer Wilson.
– Transcription skips to 08:17 –
QUESTIONER (8:17 – 8:26): Because I’m tellin’ you, I heard like, I heard like 8 shots. It was like 4, and then it was like 4 more. It was like pop pop pop pop pop, and just stopped for a minute, pop pop pop.
WITNESS (8:27 -8:32): police officer, how many times you heard that? The police was like, at least 10 yards away from him shooting –
WITNESS (8:32 – 8:40): – and I’m thinking that – the dude was still standing – I’m thinking that he was missing him. Then he kept coming towards him [inaudible].
Last point, if the search for truth is so important to the media – how come no-one has ever aired the full video from eye witness Michael Brady?