CNN Appears Desperate To Assist Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks With Fictitious Narratives Around The Mike Brown Shooting…

Desperately Seeking Dee Dee- “A Paramout Significants” 

In 2012 the same CNN network now trying to gin up racial animus around the Mike Brown shooting was proclaiming George Zimmerman to have announced “f**king coons” via phone with a 911 dispatcher as he watched Trayvon Martin disappear behind a building.

Did George Zimmerman say “f**king coons“, of course not.

Two weeks later CNN changed their mind, but not before they spent hundreds of on-air hours debating the racial mindset of Zimmerman.

Fast forward to 2014, the Mike Brown shooting, and you find a similar approach by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon and their various panel guests including Sonni Hostin and Marc Lamont.

Parks and Crump

Desperately Seeking Dee Dee – In 2012 Parks and Crump needed a witness to get to second base, the arrest. Absent of evidence they created a witness to support their demands, an arrest. They need the arrest to establish ‘probable cause’ for their wrongful death lawsuits.

That is THE ONLY reason they are demanding an arrest – PERIOD!

In 2014 Parks and Crump are working desperately to find their modern “Dee Dee” witness, and why CNN continues to assist them is a very odd, yet ideologically aligned, dynamic.

Last week we discovered Kevin Christopher Seltzer (DOB 4/26/84), a resident of the Canfield Gardens apartment complex who had uploaded several video segments to his various social media.

Coincidentally, 30-year-old Mr. Seltzer, a convicted felon, had served prison time for various criminal infractions in Broward County Florida, home of the aforementioned Trayvon Scheme Team.

Benjamin+Crump+Tampa+Church+Holds+Town+Hall+QGaz0oqyOwHl

Natalie Jackson, Benjamin Crump, Daryl Parks – FLORIDA, 2012

Around five days ago Mr. Seltzer was in communication with the Scheme Team partner Natalie Jackson. Natalie Jackson was the locally racist Sanford Florida attorney whose business model needs racial divisions and lawsuits – She became the on-the-ground scheme partner to Parks and Crump.

Soon after contact Mr. Seltzer began scrubbing his social media (twitter and instagram) and locking down from public visibility/scrutiny. We watched the conversations with the scheme team.   Yesterday the reasoning became clear.

Mr. Seltzer is the Canfield Greens resident whose video you are seeing aired on CNN to support the claim that Big Mike Brown held his hands up prior to the shooting.

2012’s “Fucking Coons“, has been modified to 2014’s “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot“.

Two construction workers, who are “anonymous” – for obvious reasons (GO FIGURE) are being positioned to be the 2014 verion(s) of Dee Dee, (aka 2012’s Rachel Jeantel, witness #8, also “anonymous” for obvious reasons):

(CNN) — Two men, shocked at what they saw, describe an unarmed teenager with his hands up in the air as he’s gunned down by a police officer.

They were contractors doing construction work in Ferguson, Missouri, on the day Michael Brown was killed.

And the men, who asked not to be identified after CNN contacted them, said they were about 50 feet away from Officer Darren Wilson when he opened fire.

An exclusive cell phone video captures their reactions during the moments just after the shooting.

The cop didn’t say get on the ground. He just kept shooting,” the man said.

That same witness described the gruesome scene, saying he saw Brown’s “brains come out of his head,” again stating, “his hands were up.”

The video shows the man raising his arms in the air — just as, he says, Brown was doing when he was shot.

The other contractor told CNN he saw Brown running away from a police car.

Brown “put his hands up,” the construction worker said, and “the officer was chasing him.”

The contractor says he saw Wilson fire a shot at Brown while his back was turned.

The men said they didn’t seen how the confrontation started. (read more)

Of course, as with “Dee Dee” the anonymity plays well for the scheme team (Parks, Crump, Jackson/Gray) goals. Anonymity stops scrutiny in further media discussion.

As with all structural lies and deception, anonymity facilitates the ruse.

Looking at the new witnesses, which are not actually new because the LA Times interviewed Kevin Seltzer (aka Christopher_4_26, aka Yung anias) on August 15th, you’ll note a few general aspects which, just like Tiffany Mitchell and Piaget Crenshaw, contradict each other.

According to the CNN propaganda the construction workers claim to be “50 feet” from the shooting.  CNN mistake #1, actually there is an unattributed statement from the construction crew saying approximately 50 yards (150 ft).  However, even that is seriously flawed.

Canfield Map New 2

The actual “anonymous” construction workers were 220+ feet away from the shooting.

That would be a difference of 170 feet from the claim in the CNN article, or almost 4 times as far.

statement 3

Oh well, the “Fucking Coons” continues….

And if you actually look at the location you can clearly see the building where Piaget Crenshaw’s apartment is located is directly blocking their view for most of the event.

You can also notice the blocked view in the actual video CNN is displaying.

However, if you are unfamiliar with the entire scene it appears they are closer because of the optical illusion created by the iPad doing the recording which was located in the basement apartment at the time.

mike brown construction workers

You might also note that CNN is only airing an edited segment of the video uploaded by Kevin C Seltzer.  They are also looping the “hands up aspect” for obvious reasons.

For the full segment of the video, as well as an understanding of the ideology behind felonious Mr. Seltzer himself, you can watch it below: (@1:55 – 2:09)

The primary take-aways are these:

•  Attorney’s Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump NEED Darren Wilson arrested in order to get paid (lawsuits)
•  Daryl Parks and Ben Crump will follow their previous playbook and manufacture media evidence to get that arrest.
•  CNN in 2014, just like CNN 2012, will assist Parks/Crump in a public display of the manufactured evidence they create.
•  All of the manufactured evidence is for public opinion consumption only.  None of it would hold up to scrutiny in a courtroom.

Little, if any, of the currently debated evidence in the media is even remotely consistent.

Here’s an example of witness inconsistency:

statement 1

statement 2

The REAL evidentiary issue has never been whether or not Big Mike Brown at one point or another “put his hands in the air“, perhaps he did.

The actual and legal question is:  Did “Big Mike Brown”, advance toward Officer Wilson, in a threatening manner, when he finally stopped running and turned around?

And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting.  (link)

Did Officer Wilson retreat while Big Mike was advancing toward him in a threatening manner while saying “what you gonna do, shoot me“?…. and then charge?

Looking at the known evidence from witnesses as well as physical evidence at the scene it certainly looks like Mike Brown was moving forward and Darren Wilson was moving backward.

Brown was shot in the front.

Brown was shot facing Wilson.

Canfield Map 6 Evidence Markers - Witnesses - White Vehicle

WITNESS (6:05 – 6:08): They just walked right past me when I was going, coming out the house [inaudible].

WITNESS (6:10 – 6:12): [Inaudible] I mean [inaudible] I went back in –

QUESTIONER (6:12): That’s the one –

WITNESS (6:13 – 6:18): That’s the one that ran behind this right here, ‘cause he ran up there where we was at, where we live at.

WITNESS (6:19 – 6:20): Now I was, when I came back outside –

Key Element – It appears, as witness was coming out of his house, he saw Mike Brown and Dorian Johnson just walking, he then went back inside for a minute, and when he came back out the confrontation had begun.

WITNESS (6:20 – 6:26): – all I seen was the police in that truck right there. Dudes – I don’t know what happened [inaudible] –

QUESTIONER (6:26): So whose hat is that right there?

WITNESS (6:27 – 6:29): That’s his hat, I don’t know what happened –

QUESTIONER (6:29 – 6:30): How’d he get from there to here?

WITNESS (6:30 – 6:33): ‘Cause he ran. The police was still in the truck.

QUESTIONER (6:33): They came this way?

WITNESS (6:34 – 6:40): Naw, he was right there, the police was still in the truck. He’s like, I don’t know, he was kinda pushing with his hands [inaudible] he was in that truck.

QUESTIONER (6:38 – 6:40, crosstalk with last part of above): Running this way →? Why his body come this way ←though?

Key Element – the questioner is asking if Mike Brown was running East, why is his body facing West?

WITNESS (6:41 – 6:47): Him and the police, yeah him and the police, I mean the police was in the truck. He was like over the truck right, now.

WITNESS (6:47 – 6:51): But [“cause”] then he ran. Police got out and ran after him [inaudible].

Key Element – the Witness is stating Officer Wilson and Mike Brown both initially headed East

WITNESS (6:51 – 6:55): Then the next thing I know, he coming back towards the police. The police had his gun drawn already.

QUESTIONER (6:56 – 6:57): Oh, the police dropped the son?

Key Element – the witness is stating Mike Brown stopped, turned and began coming back toward officer Wilson who had his gun drawn.  *Note* No gun fire prior to Mike Brown turning around – no shots toward the back.

WITNESS (6:57 – 7:05): Yeah the police shot him. The police kept dumping him, and I’m thinking that the police missing like, he’s like, police was like this far from him.

WITNESS (7:06 – 7:12): And I’m thinking [inaudible], at least, at least 5 shots. Next thing I know, I think he’s missing.

Key Element – Witness implying Officer Wilson and Mike Brown close in proximity when he observes initial volley of gunfire.   Witness sounds incredulous because from his perspective officer Wilson should not be missing at the distance he’s observing.

QUESTIONER (7:12 – 7:14): The police shoot the dude?

WITNESS (7:14 – 7:17): The police shot him. Next thing I know, I think he’s missing.

WITNESS (7:18 – 7:21): He, then dude started running, kept coming toward the police.

Key Element –  Witness is stating *AFTER* first volley of shots, we know to be six, Mike Brown then started “running”, “coming toward” officer Wilson.

– Transcription skips to 08:17 –

QUESTIONER  (8:17 – 8:26): Because I’m tellin’ you, I heard like, I heard like 8 shots. It was like 4, and then it was like 4 more. It was like pop pop pop pop pop, and just stopped for a minute, pop pop pop.

WITNESS (8:27 -8:32): police officer, how many times you heard that?  The police was like, at least 10 yards away from him shooting

WITNESS (8:32 – 8:40): – and I’m thinking that – the dude was still standing – I’m thinking that he was missing him. Then he kept coming towards him [inaudible].

evidence-cones1 grid revised

 

Darren wilson grainy 3

Black Canseco Panorama

Last point, if the search for truth is so important to the media – how come no-one has ever aired the full video from eye witness Michael Brady?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Agitprop, BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Conspiracy ?, CRS, Cultural Marxism, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, media bias, Mike Brown Shooting, Notorious Liars, Police action, Political correctness/cultural marxism, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

473 Responses to CNN Appears Desperate To Assist Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks With Fictitious Narratives Around The Mike Brown Shooting…

  1. jason says:

    sorry if already discussed but scanned quickly and didn’t see. Thought it should be pointed out the hand written notes are an OBVIOUS fake. Take a look

    Liked by 2 people

    • coeurdaleneman says:

      Can’t see your image jason, but I agree without having to. 🙂

      Like

      • jason says:

        ah… not sure what happened. Take a close look at the last half of text on the first page, and the first part of text on the 2nd page. Look at the drawing.

        The description is repeated from page 1 to page 2. The exact same wording copied from page 1 to 2, the exact same picture copied on page 1 to page 2. AND, Every single letter, scribble, mark is PRECISELY duplicated on page 1 and page 2. Someone photoshopped the text or pages.

        Liked by 1 person

    • georgiafl says:

      Could the papers be photocopies of talking points given to the two workers to learn?
      Handwriting analysis needed to compare the writing to the workers.

      Like

    • oldiadguy says:

      I’m not sure what the notes signify, but look at the left hand column. It is very faint, but it reads, employee / material / additional comments. It looks like it is some kind of form. From who and for what I don’t know.

      It is also interesting that the “progressive newspaper” has partial headline “Racist Murders.” What are the odds that a “progressive” laborer was on the scene to witness this incident. It is getting odder and odder.

      Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      OK,I started to post a lengthy comment about the credibility of those pages, but was only half finished with the analysis of it when I realized my response would take ages to read. So here’s what’s left,after I deleted 2/3 of what I had already written:

      The fact that the two blocks of text are identical isn’t proof that the written notes are fake. Heck, the diagrams are identical, too.

      What you are looking at are photo-copies. And, judging by the quality of the copies, I would say that the original was in fairly good shape before it was copied (ie it was unwrinkled and had never been folded. If either had been the case, the copier would have captured shadow marks in the image-this will be important later)

      EITHER: A) Someone wrote the original account down on LEGAL sized paper, and then someone (else?) used a copier to make a copy. But the copy machine or printer/copier/scanner only had letter sized paper

      So he shot the first copy to get the top part of the legal sized page, then slid the original higher on the copier bed (or turned it upside down) and copied the lower half of the page.

      OR: B) The original was written on a letter sized page, but the writing was very small and would be difficult to read,so it was “enlarged” in the copy process to make it appear more legible. That would also make it necessary to shoot two copies in order to capture the entire narrative (top to bottom) on letter sized copy paper. (however,due to the normal appearance of the left and right margins, I do not believe this is the case. I believe option A is the only real solution)

      So here’s what’s curious:

      Notice the faint printing along the left edge of the page that says (top to bottom):
      EMPLOYEES, MATERIALS, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS with a section on the page for each of those categories. This leads me to believe that the original was written on a blank worksheet. Something like what an estimator would use for a bid proposal, or (more likely) something that a crew foreman would use to account for time and materials on a job, so that the billing office could prepare (and submit) an accurate invoice to a customer. Also note that the top left corner of the page is “dogeared”. Was this accidental, or could that have been done to hide some sort of mark that might have identified the company name? And there’s also the distinct possibility that this form was used as a ruse to lend credibility to the authenticity of the original document. What if the person who photographed the photocopies made a completely fake document, using a generic type form to make it appear like it had been written by one of the workmen?

      There are so many observations and questions about these photocopies, I could go on ALL DAY about them. But I don’t want to hijack the thread.

      Like

      • jason says:

        good thoughts, lots of questions. This could come from an original document from elsewhere… but the photo (placement inside vehicle seat with paper from September 3rd) is obviously staged. Dunno if Kevin Seltzer was the only one to post these photos or if they’ve been circulated elsewhere (maybe someone caught the obvious issues before it became widely circulated?), but it’s clear the photo is intended to give us a certain impression IMO (more optics).

        Like

        • Angie says:

          Definitely weird coincidence that someone came upon these sheets of paper detailing what someone thinks they witnessed.It just happened that the papers were sitting in the open waiting for someone to photograph them and whose car is this?

          Like

      • Kevin Seltzer says:

        I never thought people copule be so dumb

        Like

        • LetJusticePrevail" says:

          I bet that’s what Zino and Dave were saying after you signed over the rights to your “footage”! I can just imagine how hard they are laughing right now….

          Like

  2. dizzymissl says:

    Can anybody read what was is on the left side of the worker statement? I see the word “comments” stamped, but can’t read the rest of it.

    Like

    • coeurdaleneman says:

      “Materials” and “Employees”

      But the repeated parts on two pages means that it was somehow electronically manipulated.

      Liked by 1 person

      • dizzymissl says:

        Thanks for the clarification. I agree, something has been manipulated, but do you think the paper used might be something the landscapers use for work??

        Like

      • jason says:

        yes, this!!!! 🙂

        Like

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        No, it doesn’t. See my comment above.

        Like

        • coeurdaleneman says:

          I did not mean that there was hanky panky, only that there was some sort of inexplicable copying done. In other words, odd circumstances for a purported pipelayer having electronic copying equipment in his truck that day?

          No, what is being seen is a copy of Seltzer’s own, personal notes of what he witnessed. Not the contractors.’ Why he folded them and later staged them in a vehicle seat, and then suggesting or pawning them off as someone else’s, is the only mystery.

          Like

          • Kevin Seltzer says:

            The white guy pulled them out his pocket and laid them out he didn’t want anyone to know I was looking at them I had the pic of his writing before the news for all u smart people. It’s sad to see your true colors. What did I do wrong beside being in Canfield that day. Sorry your minds are to small to understand a monkey could of shot the tape. Instead of looking at the camera man watch the film. You might learn something.

            Like

            • LetJusticePrevail" says:

              So, post the entire clips here, WITH sound, and without the edits that were put in the LA Times story.

              Give us the WHOLE truth, if you dare….

              Liked by 1 person

            • coeurdaleneman says:

              Wow, just like in the spy movies.

              Like

              • LetJusticePrevail" says:

                That isn’t Kevin Seltzer. Just some poser trying to get a rise out of us. And s/he isn’t very good at it, either.

                Like

                • coeurdaleneman says:

                  That I figured. As if a landscaper brought his notes with him a subsequent day in order to let an apartment guy look at them and photograph them surreptitiously. For what purpose? Proof that he made a statement? Or to let Kevin mastermind a secret project? LOL

                  Like

    • John Galt says:

      Did anybody try to decipher the sketch appearing on the worker statement with the “40 50 yds” note? Maybe it indicates a position for the construction workers in the wrong parking lot. Sketch shows parking lot immediately adjacent the east side of Piaget’s building, not next parking lot over to the east on Canfield where workers and truck are actually located in the video?

      40-50 yards might be more consistent with that location?

      My comments on sketch:

      The first two vertical lines appear to indicate the street and the asterisk designates Michael Brown and/or Wilson. The sketch also shows a rectangle with the longer sides thereof disposed parallel with the street. What does this represent? A parking lot? A building? Two more asterisks appear in the sketch, one inside the rectangle and one in the space between the street and the rectangle. What does the “?” mean? That the person preparing the sketch is not sure? Which would mean that the sketch was not prepared contemporaneously with the shooting while having a view of the scene?

      Like

  3. disgustedwithjulison says:

    What is the purpose of the repetitive photocopied “letter” you have posted Sundance? It appears to be a witness statement, but underneath it is a September 3rd copy of Challenge Magazine – a communist newspaper that has been helping organize a lot of the phoney stuff in Ferguson. Was the letter supposed to look like it was written down by the “witness” and placed on the front seat of his work vehicle at the time of the incident? Kind of hard to justify that when it is clearly photocopied (and the same thing is on each page)….and, a September 3rd copy of Challenge lies underneath it.
    http://progressivelaborparty.squarespace.com/storage/challenge-archives/2014/090314_WEB.pdf

    Like

  4. disgustedwithjulison says:

    Yahoo reported on this 20 hours ago and shows a screen shot from a TV station. They attributed their photo to:
    Notes by contractor who witnessed the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. (Screen shot/KTVI-TV)

    As I dig deeper into where the photos come from and blogs….it appears that three days ago, the photo was put forth by a blog called the trial file. The photo was taken from a Tweet posted by someone named @unlovedsoul2384. It appears that that Twitter account has now been shut down….but….thank goodness for cacheing…here is the Twitter account and what appears to be the initial photos. Can anyone pull from those photos the metadata that tells where they were taken, etc.?

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tyTrPXyn69gJ:https://twitter.com/unlovedsoul2384+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    Liked by 2 people

    • dizzymissl says:

      The photo came from christopher_4_26 twitter. Read back a few threads for all of the information. Treepers were way ahead of CNN on this (as usual)

      Liked by 1 person

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        LOLZ it seems that there is a dispute about some “footage” between a couple of parties and one of the parties recorded a conversation about the dispute over the ownership of that footage,and how it could not be used for any commercial purpose without the expressed consent of the new owner of that footage. Have a listen:

        Like

      • froggielegs says:

        @unlovedsoul2384 & christopher_4_26 is the same person, same twitter account. Twitter gives you 2 names. For instance, my name on twitter is…

        FroggieLeggs @FroggieLeggs_

        Their name on Twitter was…

        christopher_4_26 @unlovedsoul2384

        The name with the @ is considered your username. The one with out the @ is considered your real name. You can choose to use your real name or not. Unless you are a celeb or using Twitter for business, most people don’t use their real name.

        This Twitter account is that of Kevin Seltzer along with this one I posted earlier..

        chris anias gotti @yunganias

        Like

    • John Galt says:

      christopher_4_26
      They was on some scan shit him and zino so I got his dumb ass to admit it over the phone. Now he trying to say he own some shit when my lawyers already proved he don’t he mad i exposed him.

      Kevin has multiple lawyers and financial ownership interests. Isn’t that interesting.

      Like

  5. coeurdaleneman says:

    There are a lot of tells to those two pages. But the comical one is the diagram on the right hand side. What on earth is that supposed to be signifying? A truck with one worker in and one worker out, with a dot in the street?

    Suppose for a second that this document was bona fide, and written onsite right afterwards. So what was the worker doing, writing a memo-to-self, or composing a statement to enlighten a researcher? If so, wouldn’t a construction worker used to working with blueprints made a better diagram of where he was, how his vehicle was situated, and maybe even labeled the box as a “truck” or an “apartment building.”

    No, this document looks like it was drawn later by someone without experience working with plan documents, using inept language, and not too bright. This looks like what Seltzer would use to communicate his thoughts in an amateurish, rudimentary way.

    Like

    • Mr. Izz says:

      I have been trying to look really closely at the documents. The comments above are correct, the same information is on the two pages. Same handwriting, same wording, exact same pages. Why would someone write these, make a copy (a copy that is just positioned differently on another page), take a picture of the two pages together, and post that information? Are they trying to make it look like there is a detailed account? More likely is that it is a complete fake.

      And yes, the diagram doesn’t make any sense. Maybe someone with better eyes (or better access to programs) could blow up the images and transcribe what is written.

      Like

      • John Galt says:

        “Why would someone write these, make a copy (a copy that is just positioned differently on another page), take a picture of the two pages together, and post that information? Are they trying to make it look like there is a detailed account?”

        Remember this?

        Liked by 3 people

    • Larry Wolfe says:

      Somebody like the guys around here who dig holes and glue together PVC pipe for waterlines, under the nominal supervision of a licensed plumber. Somebody else looks at plans etc. then points and says “Run the pipe from here to here” and the manual labor begins. (I speak from much personal experience on this one)

      Like

      • VegasGuy says:

        Also kinda strange that the items – 2 part letter, stack of news papers, dirnk, and “whatever the item at lower right. are positioned on the drivers seat.

        Yep the drivers seat. See the attachment where the seat belt snaps.

        That would not be a place where the items (other than the letter) would normally be.

        Wouldn’t the passenger seat be more logical?

        Seems a staged photo for sure. And remember these guys left the scene by 12:07 pm.

        Like

      • coeurdaleneman says:

        Larry Wolfe, then where was that guy on the day in question on site? There is no indication that these two workers had a superivisor telling them what to do before noon on Aug 9. There is no evidence that these workers were doing work by reading off plans.

        In reality, these are not their notes. They are the recollections of Seltzer himself, including the touchie-feelie anecdote about Jesus Christ and Seltzer’s own frustrations with life.

        Like

  6. nivico says:

    Lol, Crump caught off guard in the Wolf Blitzer interview around the 2:22 mark:

    Blitzer: Were you aware of the video, Mr. Crump, before it aired on CNN last night?

    Crump: Look, ye…, uh, we had heard rumors of it but we were not aware of it and, uh, it was…

    Liked by 2 people

  7. justice099 says:

    My suggestion is that we don’t give it away that we are on to them. Let them think we took the bait.

    Like

  8. jason says:


    interesting phone conversation, talking about selling video to ‘help mike brown’

    Liked by 1 person

  9. nivico says:

    RE the photocopied statement…

    The original was obviously written on some sort of legal pad which can run in size up to 8.5 ” x 14″

    Copy paper is 8.5″ x 11″

    My guess is that there was no intentional editing, they just had to make two copies to get the entire original document copied.

    The big question is how did this Seltzer guy get his hands on a copy of this witness statement evidence so that he could post it on Twitter?

    Lawyers would be able to request a copy through formal discovery… just saying 😉

    Like

    • jason says:

      def seems to have been written on 1 legal sized paper, then divided up into 2, but that brings up some questions.
      1) legal paper? Who/where would the witness go and write down these details on a legal paper?
      2) pages staged on car/truck seat, with paper from 9/3. Who would do this and why?

      Like

      • nivico says:

        The phone conversation you posted above, I’m presuming that’s Seltzer?

        In the conversation he refers to his lawyer as ‘she,’ so if it is Seltzer then we know of one ‘she’ lawyer he was in contact with… and we know about her affiliation with the scheme team.

        And didn’t one of the captions in a Seltzer Tweet mention that he knew of some shenanigans going on (a coverup)?

        Like

      • StLouieGirl says:

        Not a clue if this is pertinent or not but—– the reporter from KTVI Fox 2 running this story about the construction guy on August 12th has not Tweeted since September 3rd. She is a Black woman and grew up in STL so this story would be one worth helping her bros with.

        She is also responsible for the wonderful sound effects (multiple gun shots) in her story as the guy is telling his side as to distract the viewer.

        Liked by 1 person

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        The legal sized paper appears to have been a blank worksheet that a company would give to a crew foreman who had to track costs for a job and includes time and materials.

        Now, it could be a complete fake… a generic form that was used to make it LOOK authentic, as if it was something a workman would write on before he gave it to the police. (Usually police will give you a pre-printed form that says “Witness Statement” on it, so why use a work form you snatched off a clipboard in your work truck?)

        And you ask a very good question about WHY the pages would be photographed while spread out on a car seat. Was that out of necessity (in a rush and had to hide the act of photography from prying eyes) or was it by design, to make it appear as if the photographer was snapping a quick pic of something he didn’t have control over? Whose car is it? (It’s definitely not a work truck) What type of car is it?

        And, why were the copies folded? If you went to the trouble of making copies, why fold them?

        Don’t forget that our suspect may have had a graduate course in criminal activities, provided by the FL Department of Corrections. And LOTS of time to think about devious “PSYOPS” type obfuscations. This ain’t his first rodeo.

        Like

  10. stormyeyesc says:

    there are some interesting clips on this site…….some I had never seen. One is (channel 4.KMOV news repost- aug. 12) and the other is (Trippy post-Mike’s mother refuse to listen to police). There is some new stuff on here

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ba-Da-Bing-BBQ-St-Louis/115199478491240

    Like

    • Angie says:

      Did you happen to notice “These white men had body counts..”? It implies that the 3 men all faced the police and came out alive. They might want to recheck because Adam Lanza definitely did not survive his run in with the police.

      Like

  11. coeurdaleneman says:

    I think that everything was generated by Seltzer, including the original document captured by the two photocopies.

    The material represents everything that he saw beforehand and afterwards. Whether he took steps to deliberately mislead–or whether others later misconstrued what he produced, after mentally associating them with the worker video that Seltzer made–is unclear. But there isn’t an iota of evidence that the construction workers made this material or gave interviews to local stations. In fact, after listening to the local Fox interview upthread, it strikes me that the mystery witness interviewed was Seltzer (who spoke about “Michael”).

    Frankly, the only thing we know about the construction workers is contained in the videos.

    Like

    • georgiafl says:

      Did Seltzer come up with this on his own or were Shahid, Crump, Natalie Jackson the authors of the witness statement, etc.?

      Like

      • coeurdaleneman says:

        I think that the statement and diagrams were made by Seltzer sometime shortly after the fact. In fact, they seem truthful about what he saw, and his personal experience with MB beforehand.

        Where the deception might have started was juxtaposing this online with his videos, leading everyone (intended or not) to believe that the copy came from the construction workers

        If so, the effort seems too dumb for Crump, even. No, this is bottom-feeding, Section 8 stupid.

        Like

    • John Galt says:

      MSNBC played some distorted audio of an alleged worker, but Sharpton said they can’t authenticate the video.

      Liked by 2 people

      • coeurdaleneman says:

        Does ANYone in ANY video identify himself as a construction worker, or is described so by an interviewer who spoke to him in person and can verify?

        I haven’t listened to anything like that yet (disclaimer: I don’t claim to have listened to everything, but I am curious about what anyone has like that)

        Like

      • Larry Wolfe says:

        They indicated on CNN that Randi Kay spoke with both workers and they authenticated the audio. Chris Hayes said on MSNBC that the audio was distorted to protect that worker’s identity.

        Like

  12. StLouieGirl says:

    Okay- we know North County (Ferguson, etc) is the mega-capital of Section 8 housing in the STL area and so how does one go about getting free rent?

    Unemployed Kevin Seltzer (aka rap star wannabe talking to LATimes and rapping for ABC 20/20) who moved in with his girlfriend at Canfield. We have Dorian Johnson living with his girlfriend. I think almost every black guy we hear about is living with his girlfriend at Canfield??

    It’s called “Section 8 PIMPING” and these guys ONLY live with girls (and babies) that receive Section 8 housing. FREE RENT for these low lifes. What a SWEET DEAL!

    I sure hope Mr Seltzer gets his record deal out of this………. fame and fortune for this guy!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Does anyone have the info of Wilson’s account? I seem to remember Wilson’s account that Brown dropped his hands after raising them. Does anyone remember that or where I can find that?

    Also, in addition to the witness in the video, the worker says Brown moved 20-25 feet toward the cop. He’s saying Brown’s moves towards the cop could have been “I’m going to get you, you’re already shooting me.” The worker also talks of Officer Wilson BACKING UP which is something that helps Wilson’s case.

    Like

    • jason says:

      here’s a story with some of that discuss RepP… there are definitely articles with a more lengthy discussion/details (WaPo?, Gatewaypundit?) but couldn’t find it readily
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/20/us/shooting-accounts-differ-as-holder-schedules-visit.html?ref=us&_r=2

      According to his account to the Ferguson police, Officer Wilson said that Mr. Brown had lowered his arms and moved toward him, law enforcement officials said. Fearing that the teenager was going to attack him, the officer decided to use deadly force. Some witnesses have backed up that account. Others, however — including Mr. Johnson — have said that Mr. Brown did not move toward the officer before the final shots were fired.

      Liked by 1 person

      • dizzymissl says:

        Wait. This means that DW never said that MB didn’t have his hands up. Why do the landscapers matter then?

        Like

        • sundance says:

          BINGO. That’s what I was saying in the post above. This “hands up” stuff is all moot.

          PS. for irony – Kevin Seltzer works at the “Hands Down” car wash. LOLOL 😀 Can’t make this stuff up.

          Liked by 6 people

      • Thank you! That’s what I was looking for, now I remember reading it there.

        If people think about it, what the worker says could fit with that. “After the third shot, Brown’s hands started going down, and he moved about 25 feet toward Wilson, who kept backing away and firing.” The worker could tell if it could have been or “OK, I’m going to get you, you’re already shooting me.” The shots happened quickly, we don’t know how accurate the worker’s version is.

        I do recall tantrums in the YouTube comments http://youtu.be/0mAaJMBxKA4 claiming that Brown DIDN’T come keep coming towards the cop (insisting witnesses said he didn’t such as Piaget Crenshaw) yet this worker is saying that Brown came towards the cop for 20-25 feet. (while dead no less)

        We should remember that the family autopsy said only the last two shots were fatal so he wouldn’t have ben “dead” and it is possible if he hadn’t kept coming at the cop he could have lived. Who walks “dead” for 20-25 feet? Doesn’t sound possible.

        We really have to keep in mind that witnesses aren’t always accurate and that there are already contradictions in statements. Crenshaw makes the claim “at no time did I see him move towards officer, he may have taken one centimeter of a step forward.” BUT the workers says Brown came 20-25 feet.

        Like

  14. Goofey says:

    Concerning the Red shirt Worker why only snippets of the interview? Why not the whole unedited interview? Why do the reporters interpret what he said? So it fits their narrative? The same with Brady where is his unedited phone video with original audio?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Larry Wolfe says:

      Anderson Cooper and several on MSNBC kept saying that the workers’ accounts were “completely consistent” with all the other “eyewitness” accounts. Chris Hayes did at some point mention the background witness audio in Black Conseco video, but dismissed it because the speakers had not “come forward.” The claim that the dead body kept walking for 25 feet was, ahem, a bit inconsistent I’d say.

      Like

    • Amber says:

      Maybe the scheme team is monitoring this site?…as we analyze the evidence evidence is being released to discredit what we have proven to be fact and truth in this case.
      I’ve noticed an awful lot of the video footage of the scene of the incident has started dissapearing online. Not only that but naturally, as more social media accounts with the story come to light, no sooner that we find about about them they are being made private or removed completely. :/

      Liked by 2 people

  15. jason says:

    hmm… a little OT but Shahid video.. 4 different clips posted on the same page

    Like

  16. John Galt says:

    Dorian posted a photo on FB showing him all dressed up and standing in front of a bookshelf full of law books circa September 10.

    Like

  17. jason says:

    Video of Lesley McSpadden as she was being interviewed. Tell me if it’s just my imagination, but does she do something a bit odd when talking about Mike going to college in 2 days ~30 second in or so?

    Like

      • dizzymissl says:

        I will laugh so hard if you are right:)

        Liked by 1 person

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        Looks like a Kleenex to me

        Like

        • jason says:

          gotta watch the vid. I might be reading too much into it, but let me know what you think after viewing it a time or two.

          Liked by 1 person

          • LetJusticePrevail" says:

            I watched it to the very end, when she used it to wipe her eyes. I might not agree with her anger, but I feel compassion for her pain. She’s a mother who lost her son, something no parent should ever have to experience. Sure, she’s probably made a LOT of P*** Poor life choices, some of which probably led to her son’s delinquency and/or even to his very death. But this? We can do better. We really can.

            I’m not trying to preach about it (OK maybe I am) but it’s this type of conjecture that makes us all look a tad… ….I don’t know the correct word… you reflect on it and choose what you think it should be.

            Liked by 1 person

            • jason says:

              I’m not trying to imply something for the sake of painting someone in a bad light. I just find it incredibly odd she takes the kleenex from the right hand, brings it up in front of her, starts to unravel it with her left, glance down, then mention ‘Valderott’.

              If you can explain the reasoning for that sequence, maybe I’ll buy it. I can’t for the life of me think I’d pull out a kleenex, unwrap it and then look at it before deciding not to use it. Those actions are pretty instinctive, I don’t often stop to view a kleenex before I use it, or view it before deciding not to use it.

              If others believe it’s a totally natural motion and sequence, I guess perhaps I just typically use my tissues in an alternate manner. Not to be flip, but I think suggesting I have some ulterior motive to make light of her situation is out of place.

              Like

              • jason says:

                further, I whole-heartedly believe that, regardless of what happened in the moments during the shooting, that after the fact, we are being sold a grand story. The ‘Gentle Giant’, who never hurt anyone, until 10 minutes before his death, the guy who raps about drugs and hoes, but it’s just a persona he adopts, the guy who is consistently around gang members and wearing clothing that would seemingly identify him with said members, but just got along with everyone and was never actually in a gang, and the guy who was going to college in just 2 days, to study musical engineering… wait, I mean HVAC.

                I don’t buy this story, not for one second. And seeing this, when his mother should be grieving, to see she is probably complicit in selling this tale to try and mislead others for either money gain OR in an attempt to convict this Officer in the court of public opinion. Sorry, I am going to point it out and take issue with it. Maybe I should be better than that… maybe she shouldn’t be telling tall tales about her son while his body is still warm, for whatever motivation(s) may have caused her to do that.

                Liked by 2 people

              • LetJusticePrevail" says:

                Jason, I don’t believe you have any ulterior motive, or that you are intentionally trying to make, light of her situation but it just seems as though you’re looking a little too deeply at that one particular thing. Would it really make any difference if she HAD written down the name of that school? (And BTW, my own daughter attends a university and the name often escapes me. But no,, I’m not getting that old)

                About the Kleenex, though, think about it like a woman wearing makeup might: Tears ruin the artwork. But, what would you do if you just blew your nose in the only kleenex you have, which someone probably handed you? Would you:

                A) Dab your eyes with it, and possibly smear snot on your face? -OR-
                B) Give it a quick look to make sure you have the “Ogres from the Caves” folded to the inside?

                Also, how many times have you dabbed your eyes with an ordinary piece of paper? Not many, I would bet.

                And how many times have you tried to write on a Kleenex? How well did that work out for you?

                Like

                • jason says:

                  OK, why it makes a difference. It’s been rumored by many that Mike was not actually planning to go to college 2 days after his death. I’m not sure what to believe. I watched this video and hear the ‘2 days…..’ but missed the rest. I rewound the tape and watched again and noticed what I believe to be a very curious movement. I then noticed that she did this just prior to announcing the school. In the clip, she never makes any other movement with the ‘kleenex’.

                  So, it caught my eye. I wasn’t looking for something, it just looked weird and the more I watched, the more deliberate it seemed. If I’m mistaken, so be it. Just posted and asked for input, either others don’t agree, or didn’t care to comment so I’ll file it away and move on to something else.

                  As for remembering school name. Yes, I’m sure plenty may have trouble recalling names, especially under stress. Given the rumors, it just stuck out however. If I get stuck and forget a name, I forget the name. I would be highly unlikely to write it down. Maybe she didn’t write anything either, but in my view, it ‘s a possibility.

                  Have I written something on a kleenex? Yes, quite a bit. I don’t keep writing tabs close and tend to write on anything immediately available. Kleenex is definitely not the best surface, but it can be done.

                  All in all, this just further points to the potential Mike Brown was not likely to be headed to college as reported. And the fact of the timing that this occurred, really gets my blood boiling that a mother could be so callous to intentionally mislead people.

                  • Disclaimer* I grant that there is no clear proof what I believe happened actually occurred. I asked what others believed and if I was just imagining. You believe that I’m reading too deep and I appreciate that.

                  Like

                • jason says:

                  I see you mentioned ‘checking the kleenex’ for ogres, and yet, after the check, she doesn’t use the kleenex for another 30 seconds, at which time, she doesn’t re-check. That’s not proof of anything however, just sayin ‘it just didn’t look right’.

                  Like

            • stormyeyesc says:

              +1000

              Like

  18. Mr. Izz says:

    Not to be nit-picking, but… don’t witness statements have to be signed?

    Like

  19. watcher says:

    Can anyone identify the red object on the wall of Piagets apartment above the e-f sign? It looks like a Halloween mask to me. Could this be a gang sign or whatever? This is in the video of her interview on the balcony. Also you can hear in the background the agitator warming up the crowd below.

    Like

    • Mr. Izz says:

      The first line looks like it says “talked with victim for 25-30 min.” That’s already not close to being true. We saw video evidence of Brown robbing a store just a few minutes previous to the shooting. Following the time stamps on the store video and the time it would take to travel to this neighborhood, any conversation between the worker and Brown would have been extremely short. In addition, wasn’t the store Brown just robbed in the opposite direction of where the construction workers were standing?

      I’d appreciate someone checking me on this. Thanks.

      Like

      • LetJusticePrevail" says:

        In the first story about the 2 workers, one worker claimed he spoke to Big Mike beforehe went to the store.

        Interesting note:

        In the WaPo puffn piece about Dorian Johnson, Dorian(or was it his brother?) said that it was Dorian who wanted to go to the store, and that Bike Mike “went along for the ride” so they could talk about Big Mike’s future. If what the worker said was true, how would Mike have known he was going to the store with Dorian?

        Like

        • Mr. Izz says:

          Ah, ok. I guess that makes some sense. Terrible statement though if the copy we see is roughly the same as the one officially submitted. A lot of information is missing and/or fairly ambiguous.

          Like

    • jason says:

      does look different (heavier color, paper it’s printed on seems different), but the text and style are duplicates. So one is potentially a photocopy of the other. All in all something fishy going on but hard to figure out who’s pulling the strings and for what end :/

      Like

      • dizzymissl says:

        I wish we could see the edges in the statement that I linked because I would love to see if the words on the side are there.

        Like

        • Angie says:

          There are some headers that have either been digitally edited or accidentally smeared under “Witnessed Cop shooting”, “he would be back”, and “from who had the gun”.
          I tried to sharpen it in PSP but couldn’t.

          Like

  20. stormyeyesc says:

    At the 3:20 mark in his rap………..”they think i’m the one that made the call”

    Like

  21. stormyeyesc says:

    Above says he has talked to FBI had to get a lawyer

    Like

  22. stormyeyesc says:

    Another version of Truck video with captions CNN

    Like

  23. inspectorudy says:

    I can see a huge red area on Wilson’s face, in the one picture, that I have not seen anywhere before. Has anyone seen a clear picture of his injuries? Also one of the girl witnesses said it looked like the police was trying to “Pull” MB into the car. Is she kidding? A 6’4″ 295 lb man is going to be pulled into the car by a cop sitting in the driver’s seat? He would have had a hard time pulling in a 5 year old when you consider the steering wheel and his position on the seat.

    Like

    • nomorebsplease says:

      She saw what really happened but cannot sell it that way. That may be why they all huddled. Btw, great minds think alike 😉

      Like

    • Larry Wolfe says:

      My stepson is the size of Michael Brown. When I look at how high the windows are on SUVs, it’s obvious that there is no way. The version that Darren Wilson tried to open the door and it was slammed shut, then he opened the door a second time and was forced back in and the struggle occurred with the door open, makes the most sense to me.

      Liked by 2 people

  24. nomorebsplease says:

    All these witnesses and only one grainy photo of Darren Wilson with a possible (hard to tell the photo is fuzzy) red mark on the top left of his head. How does a man do something so obvious, with so many witnesses…but nobody has photos that are clear as day?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. conradca says:

    It’s election time again and just like in the 2012 election campaign Tyrant Obama the Liar and his progressive fascists followers are trying to prey on their base’s weaknesses in order to gain political power. They did it with lies and persecution of George Zimmerman and it worked with 110% of blacks turning out to support Tyrant Obama the Liar’s reelection. Now their trying to do it again with this shooting. You can already see the lies such as he was shot in the back. He was a good kid, who just happened to rob a 7-11. Holder is there to gin up an investigation of the police department. Hitler preyed on the failing of the German with his lies about Jews. Tyrant Obama the Liar and the progressives do the same thing.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. nameofthepen says:

    Déjà vu all over again. “All we want is an ARRE$$…”

    Liked by 1 person

  27. froggielegs says:

    Google Kevin Seltzer Ferguson

    https://www.google.com/search?q=kevin+Seltzer&oq=kevin+Seltzer&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i59l4j0.8137j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=kevin+seltzer+ferguson&start=0

    You will come up with lots of news articles with him since Aug 10th. He has been pimping out his videos since then. Ironically all the articles about him on various news sites on different dates, are all from reporter Molly Hennessy-Fiske.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. jason says:

    I didn’t realize there was a much lengthier clip of the construction worker vid at the end of this clip. Starts at ~10:30 till almost the end. Shows clearly the worker throwing his arms up and gesturing towards another man walking across the lot who also throws his hands up. Wish we could hear the audio, it seems like there could be more.

    link:

    Like

    • froggielegs says:

      Yep that’s Kevin Seltzers other youtube site 🙂

      Like

      • jason says:

        Froggie, do you happen to have a copy of the original workers clip? I have a sneaking suspicion the audio we’re given doesn’t actually occur during the pink’s shirt’s gesture. CNN showed the same clip and played 3 different audio clips over the same video sequence. Wondering if CNN is using some selective editing when showing this clip.

        Liked by 1 person

        • froggielegs says:

          yep! Will upload it now for you 🙂 be right back

          Liked by 1 person

          • froggielegs says:

            Here ya go The original …

            Liked by 1 person

            • froggielegs says:

              The contractor didn’t say he had his hands in the air. it is someone else. The Contractor is on the phone when it is said, “He had his fucking hands in the air”

              Liked by 1 person

              • jason says:

                is it me, or is there another voice as well after the ‘hands in the air’. I hear ‘Like this?’ and a response of ‘Like this!

                May explain why the guy on the left can be seen throwing his hands up in the air in direct response to the construction worker. Maybe I’m hearing what I want tho.

                Liked by 1 person

                • justice099 says:

                  When I extracted the audio and tried to clean it up, this is what I hear:

                  “No f&^% threat at all” at the very beginning of the clip.
                  pause
                  “He had his F&$^ hands in the air”
                  lots of noise while Kevin was shifting around
                  “Then he shot him on the ground”
                  short pause
                  Either “they just killed this N$%^&r” or “Heard he say he’ll kill this n$%^&r” (CNN says this was part was coming from a man that had just pulled up beside them. This was also right around the time the worker threw his hands up.)

                  Those are the clear parts. Kevin is making too much noise during the rest. But, I’ll try to describe it:

                  Then there is another voice I can’t quite make out, but might be what sounds like “like this” but cleaned up, it is more like “Is he high?” or possibly “is this how?”

                  Then “Imma a cap that” or something like that.

                  Then there is something that sounds like an argument between a man and a woman (maybe inside the complex) but all I can make out is a woman saying “B%$^& I don’t remember talking to you” at the very end of the video.

                  I couldn’t hear “like this” anywhere in the audio. There seems to be two CNN versions. One has the hands in the air audio overlaid when the worker puts his hands up. Another one has the “like this” attributed to him.

                  Liked by 2 people

                • jason says:

                  ty justice

                  Like

            • jason says:

              TY 🙂

              Like

    • jason says:

      link:

      extended CNN coverage of the worker footage. They have at least 2 or 3 audio clips from the workers, but we only see the same couple seconds of video with guy throwin his hands up Really interesting why they don’t play the entire clip.

      Also mentions that the 2nd worker said a second officer on the scene with gun drawn… although it’s not clear if he meant at the time of the shooting, or shortly after.

      Like

      • Larry Wolfe says:

        I think Randi Kay changed the workers’ story compared to the version the night before! Could you post that one? (If not, I think it’s on my DVR)

        Like

    • AghastInFL says:

      does red shirt raise his arms of his own accord? or in response to the others / other man?

      Like

      • froggielegs says:

        That’s a screenshot from the video of the guys talking to Benzino in the car. The video with the crappy music LOL

        Like

        • sundance says:

          So is this when Kevin Seltzer was discussing selling the video? Brokered deal by Dave Mays? and maybe Seltzer signed away his rights to the video, to Benzino… who sold it to CNN for use and Seltzer was cut out of deal and is subsequently in phone call with Dave Mays as above ?

          Like

          • LetJusticePrevail" says:

            That’s what I gathered. Mays is telling Seltzer that he’s SOL if he wants to make money off the “footage” (I’m thinking it’s either the footage he shot in the “Roots” video, or the footage shown in the” LA Times” video.) I wonder what he expects to get from what amounts to about 3 minutes of actual footage?

            Like

        • justice099 says:

          DO we know who the drunk & stoned dudes are? The guy with the Break Ankles shirt looks really familiar to me.

          Like

  29. Larry Wolfe says:

    Does anyone now where Tiffany Mitchell lives? I’m not asking you to post it. It seems to me that there is an assumption she arrived in the direction West to East because we thought at first that a green car on that side was hers. Perhaps she arrived heading East to West, same direction as Officer Wilson, and when she said she pulled into the parking lot right beside his SUV, it would have been the Black Conseco parking lot. In this case, she would have seen nothing, because struggle was on other side of police car and shooting would have occurred while she pulled in and parked. It’s a long shot, but I was wondering if it is a possibility.

    Like

  30. Larry Wolfe says:

    I don’t recall anyone mentioning how weird it was that at least three witnesses said that what they saw “just didn’t look right.” I can’t imagine that my reaction to any of the things where this phrase was used would be that. Like, “I saw a guy and a police officer fighting though the window, and thought to myself, duh, gee, that doesn’t look right.” Or, “I saw the police shoot the teenager in the back, and thought to myself, hey, that just isn’t right.”

    Like

  31. Larry Wolfe says:

    Who is the person in dark clothing running right to left on the street before(?) the worker’s hands go up? Could the red-shirted worker be reacting to that?

    Like

  32. stormyeyesc says:

    I wondered about the person running BACK towards the cars on the left. IIRC, this is where we saw the possible Dorian near a red suv and against the car behind the red SUV as the first ambulance was arriving on scene There were 3 others there with him. At least one of the people walking toward Mike’s body has the identical clothes on. Why is someone running BACK towards that lot when everyone else is walking out to the scene??

    Like

  33. jason says:

    Came across this video from Fox that shows the handwritten letter. Image is pretty blurry and probably better viewed from video itself. Notice that obviously note is on a single sheet and not 2 as above. It also does not seem to have the writing on the left border that are in the pics on the car seat above (Comments, Materials, Employee). The pic from the Fox video seems to be the same as the one posted by dizzymissl above.

    Soooo… best guess is the ones on car seat are fully staged, a copy of the original, placed on the seat and divided onto 2 sheets.

    I don’t know if high res pics have been posted elsewhere, but it seems like it would be hard to produce a copy with the clarity of the pics on the carseat without having a much better copy to go by (original perhaps?!?). But, the ‘written statement’ could be legit I suppose. Why and how someone staged the fakes above, and further that it seems to have originated from the guy who captured the video of the construction workers raises a few red flags however.

    Fox2 video link:http://fox2now.com/2014/09/08/two-jefferson-county-construction-workers-describe-michael-brown-shooting/

    Like

  34. sundance says:

    1,) Video without audio:

    2.) Video with enhanced audio

    3.) Video used by CNN

    Like

  35. stormyeyesc says:

    Brown had one shoe on I see (clearer shot of him on ground)

    Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      I’m not sure he still had a shoe on. The pattern on his left foot seems to be all “sock” and the right foot is partially hidden. Which one do you believe has the shoe on it?

      Like

  36. Bob Stone says:

    “Don’t You Kick That Dog!” — Forensic & Legal Analysis of Brown Shooting: In Defense of Officer Wilson

    “Excellent legal and forensic analysis of Brown shooting. Actually dealing in facts and not racist emotion.” — Stop The Cop Haters

    “Great Stuff! Going up at 7pm today.” – Law Enforcement Today

    http://flowersforsocrates.com/2014/09/11/dont-you-dare-kick-that-dog-in-defense-of-officer-wilson/

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Rob Crosly says:

    Thank you for the incisive analysis of the latest Brown “evidentiary” video segment. It is just too conveniently coincidental that a “witness” claims Brown engaged him in a religious discussion (prior to robbing the convenience store), thereby lending credence to the Brown camp’s ongoing attempts to characterize Brown as a choir-boy. It is also suspect that only a select segment of the recording appears to have been divulged and even reiterated in the released version for emphasis. The clencher for me are the handwritten notes — preposterous in their form and content and so obviously contrived with outside assistance.

    Like

    • Angie says:

      If Jesus did come up in the conversation with the construction workers, one would have to wonder about MB’s mental state. Within a short time of the conversation, he robs a convenience store, accosts a worker, and is thought to have bum rushed OW.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s