Trademark Comparisons ? Mike Brown’s Parents Rally With Trayvon’s Parents….

peace fest

Team Skittles rallies with Team Swisher of Sweets

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Agitprop, Anti-White Intifada, BGI - Black Grievance Industry, Cultural Marxism, Dept Of Justice, media bias, Mike Brown Shooting, Mob and Rob, Police action, propaganda, Racism, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

184 Responses to Trademark Comparisons ? Mike Brown’s Parents Rally With Trayvon’s Parents….

  1. auscitizenmom says:

    “It’s all I ask.”……………………for now.

    Like

  2. nyetneetot says:

    I don’t know why I’m surprised, but I am.

    Like

  3. kinthenorthwest says:

    Question, sort of —- Sybrina Fuller has not gone back to a full-time job yet has she?? She is still living off Trayvon’s money right?? Is Tracy Martin the father working???

    Next question were Brown’s parents working. I heard Brown was not living with either of his parents, and hadn’t been for a while. I also heard he wasn’t even living at Grandmas either.

    Like

    • auscitizenmom says:

      You don’t have to worry about Traymom. She was already a member of a grifter’s group that buys houses and then doesn’t make the payments, so she doesn’t have a mortgage payment or a rent payment each month, like the rest of us do. 👿

      Liked by 1 person

    • realitycheck says:

      I don’t think there has been accounting or audit of “the charity”, at least I cant find any info. The last filing for The Miami Foundation was 11/2013 for the 2012 year. There was no information in that filing.

      Liked by 2 people

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      The Brown’s have struck it rich in the thug-lottery. Their gofundme campaign has already collected over $234k (and rising by the minute) which will be used as seed money to finance other projects, foremost of which will be the drive to bring charges against Darren Wilson, enabling Crump to shoot for the big jackpot-a civil suit against Wilson and the Ferguson PD.

      As far as the employment statuses of $ybrina, Tracy, and either of Mikey Mike’s parents, I really have no idea. But I doubt that Tracy or $ybrina have returned to work, and I suspect the Brown’s will find new careers as professional “Show Ponies” in the BGI’s pantheon of perpetual victimhood. All they need to do is complete the martyrdom of Saint Swisher and find a rapper who will immortalize him in song, in the manner of “Abraham, Martin, and John”, but rearranged as “Mikey Mike, Jordan, and Trayvon”.

      Like

      • Maybe they could get John, George and Ringo, the ISIS Beatle brothers from Syria to do the rapping for them.

        Like

      • yankeeintx says:

        Shortly after the trial, Tracy went back to work as a truck driver. I have no idea if he is still working. He does have a new baby with Brandy to support, I don’t know if she has had to sue him for child support yet, like all the other baby mama’s did. According to Facebook, they are still together.

        Like

      • doodahdaze says:

        This should DQ them from section 8 and all other freebies. This should be reported right away or it is welfare fraud.

        Like

      • John VI says:

        Well, I believe that the gofundme campaigne was set up by parks and crump, so I would suspect that they would have to take thier customary 80% off the top for “expenses” and all.

        But I too was disappointed at how quickly that money rolled up.I wonder if gofundme takes EBT cards…

        Like

      • Will S. says:

        The “go fund me” campaigns are interesting.

        The fund has collected 236,985 for the Brown Family. The page was created four days after Mr. Brown was killed (13 August) by Adner Marcelin, Assistant to Attorneys Benjamin L. Crump, Esq. & Anthony D. Gray (Brown Family Attorneys). Ms. Marcelin is listed as the page creator and administrator. Ms. Marcelin is from Tallahassee, FL. Her relationship to the Brown family is one of Family Lawyers. According to the Go Fund Me Page (Michael Brown Memorial Fund) all funds collected will be, “used by the Brown family to cover funeral and burial expenses, travel and living expenses of the parents as they seek justice for their son, Michael Brown, Jr.” Further that “all funds collected on this website will be withdrawn to the Brown Memorial Fund established by the parents of Michael Brown. Anyone with further questions may contact their law office at 1(877) 529-9529.”

        The Michael Brown Memorial fundraising page set up by Mr. Marcelin directs individuals that may wish to donate money specifically to the Brown children (Deja 14, Andre 7 and Jasmine 5) to a different fund through Go Fund Me called, “Brown Siblings Memorial Fund”.

        The “Brown Siblings Memorial Fund” was created on 12 August (one day before the Michael Brown Memorial Fund and three days after Mr. Brown was killed). DeMarco Davidson is listed as the page creator and administrator. He identifies himself as a family friend and states he is the Trustee of the Michael Brown Jr. Memorial Fund.

        Unless there are words left out or a misspelling exist on one of the two sites, the Michael Brown Jr. Memorial (where the money from the Brown Siblings Memorial Fund will go) is a different name than the fund mentioned in the Michael Brown Memorial fund administered by Ms. Marcelin. The funds from the Michael Brown Memorial Fund are (according to the site) dedicated to go to the Brown Memorial Fund. Different names entirely. Both page names do not match the fund name that they indicate the money collected will be deposited into.

        I can find no reference for the Michael Brown Jr. Memorial fund outside of the Brown Siblings Memorial page. I can also find no reference to the Brown Memorial Fund outside of the Michael Brown Memorial Fund page. One thing that both of the funds share is that under the item number five. they both state that; “. . . Anyone with further questions may contact their law office at 1(877) 529-9529.”

        The contact number would be the toll free number for the Parks and Crump Law Firm. According to the website for Parks and Crump they specialize in; specialize in “Wrongful Death, Personal Injury and Automobile Accidents to Civil Rights.” In truth, the Parks and Crump Law Firm are not criminal attorneys but specialize in filing lawsuits for damage. Damages, in the court of law, means money – nothing more, nothing less. Just wondering; if they are the point of contact for both funds and an employee of Parks and Crump is administering one of the funds (Michael Brown Memorial Fund) just when was the last time a personal injury attorney did anything without being compensated? No accusing anyone but honestly asking if that fits the “green” narrative.

        The Brown Siblings Memorial Fund also directs anyone that wishes to contribute that they may, “also visit any Fifth Third bank.”

        Let me be honest. I don’t care nor do I have an issue with the family collecting money from anyone. They have that right. But the Michael Brown Memorial fund states they money can be used to; “cover funeral and burial expenses, travel and living expenses of the parents as they seek justice for their son, Michael Brown, Jr.” OK. Just what travel and living expenses could the family incur as the await the St. Louis County Grand Jury to render a determination on an indictment. Further, considering the fund is above 200,000.00 what are the parents “living expenses” pre and post the death of Michael Brown and should such a tragedy enrich anyone? Further, if it does begin to enrich people (attorney, family, politicians, so called community leaders) do those people not have a motive to keep the narrative going to continue such enrichment? Honestly.

        I am not a “hater” but I am also not a fan of crowd source funding because I personally know someone that lied about a “need” and received the money they wanted because they presented as a sympathetic case (“please help me, I am a single Mom and my child has a disability”. I actually wrote about this in a post that I took down and have been planning to put back up. I also have been exchanging correspondence Steve Mason the father of Lisa Mason regarding the Go Fund Me project the family has started to pay off her student loans. I am writing a post about the exchange with Mr. Mason as I do not believe the “crowd sourcing” phenomena is fully above board in many cases). This goes back to that whole character issue that Mr. Dooley and Sen. Nasheed raised about the prosecutor, right? If it is OK to question the political motives of an elected leader is it not OK to question the political and financial motives of others?

        My point in all of this is that we now have at least two funds funds; Michael Brown Memorial Fund, Brown Siblings Memorial Fund on the internet with two different named accounts that they say the money collected will go into; Brown Memorial Fund and Michael Brown Jr. Memorial Fund. Both pages have an attorney contact in Florida (Parks and Crump AAL do not list “non-profit” administration as a specialty although they may do some work in that sector) and yet Mr. DeMarco Davidson (who set up the Brown Siblings Memorial Fund and states he is the Trustee of the Michael Brown Jr. Memorial Fund ) is in St. Louis and list an address of 9742 Duke Drive St. Louis, MO 63136. See the confusion. It’s a little like the confusion over the autopsy and when it was actually completed (see above) and if one of the autopsy participants is a legitimate person to be completing them.

        To be fair there was a Go Fund Me page in support of Officer Wilson and that page raised more than 234,910.00. As with the Brown Family pages I think that it is fine and people have a right to do whatever they like with the money they have provided it is legal. That said the reaction from the community has been not so nice. People have threatened to stop using Go Fund Me. The public comments about people who have or will support Officer Wilson by this fund include the normal; “racist”, “bigot”, “red neck”, “scared white people” to the downright crazy, “no better than ISIS”, “terrorist” and so on (more can be read at the twitchy link below).

        It is crazy to me that there is NO middle ground. If you want to wait for the facts of the case then it is assumed you must not be supportive of Mr. Brown and his side. Those that actually support Officer Wilson are called every name in the book other than human. Sadly, some of those who support Officer Wilson also take to the internet to call Mr. Brown and those who agree the narrative offered the Messer’s Parks and Crump names also. Sad that it has come to this. But I believe there is a narrative of “green” at work.

        More at:

        http://wishiwasntasingledad.blogspot.com/2014/08/has-it-come-to-this-again-really_20.html

        Info on ref fundraising and Parks and Crump:

        http://www.gofundme.com/ourkidsmatter.

        http://www.gofundme.com/justiceformikebrown

        http://parkscrump.com/

        http://www.gofundme.com/SupportOfficerWilson

        http://twitchy.com/2014/08/21/no-different-than-supporting-isis-libs-work-to-take-down-fundraising-page-for-officer-darren-wilson/

        Liked by 1 person

        • auscitizenmom says:

          There was something very irregular about the Trayparents’ account, too.

          Like

        • rashomon says:

          If the fund is under the control of the law firm, why isn’t is considered a “client fund account,” which in most states is covered by highly specific laws and auditing? It’s one of the easiest ways to get a lawyer disbarred.

          Like

          • ZurichMike says:

            Maybe it was not set up at the request of MB’s parents, in which case there is no accounting needed. In other words, the racist ambulance chasers are pretending to be high and mighty and are just collecting money for themselves and occasionally throwing MB’s parents some cash to shut up. Can you imagine Crump’s justification for this, said in his ebonics / Fat Albert voice: “Im gonna gib u some monies foh new suits an hair weaves and don furgeet Im gonna needs me some funds for consulting and stuff and foh my time heppin you get some justis.”

            Like

        • jello333 says:

          I don’t know the motives (not to mention what resides in the souls) of all those who support the “harmless, innocent Mike Brown” narrative. I’m certain some just don’t know any better… they have heard only one side of the story, and are naive enough to believe it without waiting for all the info to come out. So those people, the ones who really don’t know what’s up, I’ll give the benefit of the doubt to.

          But others, like those who know a lot about what was done in the GZ/TM case, those who know a little something about Parks, Crump, Sharpton, NatJack, and the others? NO! Do I “call … those who agree [with the] the narrative offered [by] the Messer’s Parks and Crump names also”? You better believe I do!

          IF they know what any semi-conscious, non-under-rock-dwelling person should NOW know about Crump and his buddies… IF they know… IF… then yep, I’ve got some choice words for THOSE kinds of people. (“Racist” and “hypocrite” being just a couple.)

          Like

      • ctdar says:

        Any money raised by brown family will go to crump & co, im sure he was paying attention to OMara the last go around.

        Like

    • kpm58 says:

      I wonder if there will be dueling trash cans at the funeral?

      Liked by 1 person

      • talkaftercarefulthought says:

        I’m sure trademark’s parents get an appearance/speaking fee everywhere they go now. So whatever’s left in the trash can after paying them, and the justice brothers, the browns get.. now dueling t-shirts might be another thing all together… hopefully forest park was a nightmare with zoo and other park quests on the weekend.

        Like

        • Sandra says:

          The speaking fee was probably paid for with the Brown fund. And $ybrina and Tracy’s travel and lodging too. Crump probably convinced McSpadden and Brown that they will end up making more money than they spend. If I were them I’d take the money NOW, and run. Run fast.

          Like

    • BigMamaTEA says:

      http://www.ufcw.org/2014/08/22/ufcw-president-hansen-statement-on-mother-of-michael-brown/
      According to this his mother is a ufcw (united food/commercial worker) union member

      Like

  4. libby says:

    In the case of trayvon, even though the message was let’s hate on whitey, let’s screw whitey good, in order to get da good settlement, from da deep pockets like da hoa, one had to yamp down the looting and the rioting.
    The hate whitey, kill whitey routine is very successful in certain communities, like 2/3’s aa ferguson.
    Unfortunately, when your hate for whitey meme gets too strong, it can be hard to turn it off when you’re tryin to control the narrative (and the money flow as well as whatever anti-whitey legislation they can muster).
    The scheme team dont care about wilson, they want money & they want legislation that increase their power and increase the reparations money flow permanently

    Liked by 1 person

    • justfactsplz says:

      I think demographics had a lot to do with why there were no riots in Sanford. I’ll just leave it at that.

      Liked by 1 person

      • talkaftercarefulthought says:

        I witnessed white flight in STL growing up there until 1985 with two handfulls of relatives still there.. Like a dog that thinks it scares away the mail man every day some AA furgeson(ites?) think they’ve omnipotent.. probably part of why mike mike charged LEO Wilson with his arm up thinking he was wonder woman. This is the reason STL (ferguson) rioted (IMHO)there is an unhealthy over-inflated sense of importance.

        Liked by 1 person

        • justfactsplz says:

          People down here were ready if there were riots here over the Martin case.

          Liked by 1 person

          • allhail2 says:

            Being in Sanford, I can assure you that specific neighborhoods within proximity to certain others were organized and ready to roll. Choke points, key roof tops, cross fire areas, safer houses, radios and other coommunications, all of it. I always stated that if they came down my street, the bravest had better be out front, and hopefully the rest will figure out “how” the street is blocked.

            Just thankful it did not come to that.

            Liked by 1 person

  5. Sha says:

    I don’t know if they are working now but both had good jobs before TM past away. Sabrina had been at her job for a long time but i can’t remember exactly where it was and if I’m not mistaken I thought Tracy was a truck driver who lived with his sister because him and his wife were separated. TM lived with his aunt and uncle and cousin boobie,(not misspelled nickname).

    Liked by 1 person

  6. doodahdaze says:

    Jaw Drop Pathetic.

    Like

  7. froggielegs says:

    Did Sharpton just hint to Obama “ordering an indictment”?

    Like

  8. sundance says:

    Tip via email – more research needed (and I’m swamped) Need Help:

    Essentially “Piaget Crenshaw, said during an interview with KSDK.com “I’ve hung out with him” (referring to Michael Brown). Piaget Crenshaw was being interviewed at the scene and her comment is towards the end of the interview. I wasn’t aware that Piaget Crenshaw knew Michael Brown”.

    http://www.ksdk.com/videos/news/local/2014/08/13/14007133/

    I have not had time to watch video but find the angle interesting. Has paiget Crenshaw admitted before that she and Mike Brown were friends?

    Also for Froggie, how does this align with your research?

    Like

    • Lou says:

      I believe froggies screen captures of her lying about the piss test could really present her as a liar. not sure if it’s criminal to use someone elses urine for a urinalysis, but definitely digs into her credibility.

      Like

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      All I can say in the video is that she had been talking with too many people prior to giving that interview.
      Talking about Miranda Rights and the other guy hiding cause he feared for his life…other things she said too. Its almost like she has used the words of someone else and put “I” into it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • froggielegs says:

      She’s mentioned in a few video’s that she has hung out with Mike Brown. She also posted on her FB page that she is the one who had to tell Brown’s parents how he died.

      At the 0:55 mark in this video, both Tiffany and Piaget are talking to Brown’s mother at the crime scene just before a cop pulls them a side to talk to them. This video is shortly after it all happened. Some of her video’s on FB have comments from people claiming to be related to Brown.

      Like

      • If I may add my feelings on whether Piaget had a friendship with Mike Brown before the shooting….I would say she didn’t know him. In her first recording she says “God bless his soul, police shot THIS BOY outside my apartment” not police shot my friend Mike or anything of that sort. Also in an interview on CNN on Aug. 22 she talks about why she started to record the incident “I knew the police shouldn’t have even been chasin’ THIS YOUNG BOY and firin’ at the same time”. Again she makes it sound like this person is unknown to her. Piaget says that the officer tried to pull BROWN into the CAR ,not Big Mike or Michael as you would call a friend but she says Brown……also wasn’t the officer driving a truck? Lastly, she talked about the family coming to the scene, “the family start comin’ up, just screamin’ and askin’ what happened, and nobody is givin’ ‘em answers. And so, me and my boss, we were like “no, we saw everything” we were standing on top of my balcony, we were like “no, we saw everything” had Piaget known Brown’s mother before that day she would have immediately told her what happened.

        Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      Here’s a link to a CNN interview of Piaget Crenshaw (accompanied by a dour-faced attorney named Karen Lewis).

      http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2014/08/18/newday-intv-ferguson-shooting-crenshaw.cnn.html

      While she does not mention “hanging out” with Mike during this interview, she does say that she has only lived in that apt complex for a month. Also, in the original video you linked, she mentioned that Mike was 17 but he was 18 when he died. This makes me wonder if she knew him from somewhere else.

      What is Michael Brown’s birthday? Had he turned 18 after Piaget Crenshaw last “hung out” with him, so that she was unaware of his age on 8/9/14?

      Also, how old is Piaget Crenshaw? From the looks of it, she’s somewhat older than 18, which makes me wonder why she would have been “hanging out” with an unemployed 17 yr old? What’s the “connection” between them?

      And note how she responded to the question about why she waited so long to release the video. She said that she had concerns for her own safety and yet, when a follow up question was asked about her “safety concerns” she responded that she initially had none, but that her attorney had advised her on the matter. Sounds like a load of crap to me. She had no problem posting videos on her facebook account, and (according to her) the police had taken her phone to copy the videos as evidence. So who was she afraid of? Not the cops, and not her friends, and not the public since she had already plastered her mug across the media. Sounds like she was just positioning herself for her “15 minutes of fame” and whatever $$$ she could sell the video, and her interviews for.

      Liked by 1 person

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        I thought she said the police took her phone in the one video and she didn’t have any video..Weird.

        Like

        • jason says:

          she mentions she had ‘already posted one on facebook and sent another in email that she could retrieve’ but there where others on her phone and she was waiting to get it back from the police department. Guess the other video included the infamous ‘pacing’ loop.. err, shot.

          Like

          • kinthenorthwest says:

            I went back and did a rundown above you will find that portion about the videos.
            its not perfect but pretty much on line and I put the times too.

            Like

        • froggielegs says:

          She posted the videos on her FB page the day of the shooting. One was at 1:53pm and the other was 9:21pm. I posted all of them here…

          https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/08/24/big-mike-brown-saint-swisher-of-sweets-general-discussion-thread/comment-page-1/#comments

          As I explained before, If she has an Iphone, she could have her setting set to immediately upload copies of her video’s and pictures to her Icloud or computer. Now with that said, she also claimed she had a video in email but couldn’t access it because her phone was taken. Hard to believe she couldn’t access it because she was able to get on her FB page that night and post the pt 2 video. She also commented a few times that night on her video’s and posted everyday since her phone supposedly being taken. Which means she also has a computer or another means to access the internet. I doubt she borrowed a phone cause everyone has their set to their FB.

          Like

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      Sundance here is my rundown of the video and spots that seemed curious–these are Piaget’s words to various questions. She is really weird, I don’t think she is able to separate what she has heard with what she thinks she saw; if she saw anything.
      Time on the video is approximate.
      0:34 Did not witness that by the time I looked out my window cause I was on my way to work. Did see the police have some type of interaction through the door and run out of the door.
      0:46 his body was laying this way cause He did turn around to tell the police that he was unarmed.
      1:37 Police just shot randomly…they shot though my neighbor’s window over there. They have a hole in their window over there. They could have harmed innocent civilians (????)
      2:28 they questioned….they took my phone into custody cause I have multiple videos of what happened. I posted them to my facebook page sent one to email so I can retrieve it.
      2:50 I saw him die. He t shot twice and he fell, after his arms were up.( she put her hands just above shoulders to Illustrate?)
      3:17 Don’t understand how he could be intimated by a 17 year old boy that unarmed & caused no drama, in the first place walking
      3:30 Plus I have hung out with him like personally he likes to play his video games… hang out with friends….he not a violent type everyone knows he didn’t have a gun on him.

      Like

      • Sandra says:

        There it is. She has hung out with him and knows some things about him. She knows he didn’t have a gun, that’s pretty intimate.

        Like

    • jason says:

      sorry if duplicate or was moderated/removed. Posted before but doesn’t seem to have taken. Please do remove again if needed. Here’s another video where Piaget also mentions ‘hanging out with Mike’, check the 6:00 mark or so.

      My impression is she didn’t know who he was, but found out after the fact of talking about everything that they had actually been at the same place together

      That said, there’s some connections that aren’t overly obvious. Piaget is Tiffany Mitchell’s employee, TM was on her way to pick up PC and go to work together. After everything played out, TM also went over/up to PC’s balcony where they hung out and watched the aftermath (and I’d bet, compared notes on what they saw).

      Last, been through most of the interviews with PC I can find and while she doesn’t mention them often, there should be some real questions as to how much (as well as what) she really saw. Apparently she only looked out window when she heard tires screech and saw an ‘entanglement’ between Brown/Wilson briefly. She immediately turned around to gather her stuff in her purse and move to another/2nd window. Before she got there the shot went off, prompting her to look outside again to see Brown and Wilson running down the street. She then went to her balcony and arrives outside just as Brown is turning (hands in the air) to get shot TWICE (in conflict with her story now that autopsy shows potentially 6 shots).

      This early story is also particularly interesting, mentioning Brown running away from the car with his ‘hands in the air’???

      Eyewitness, Piaget Crenshaw, 19, was waiting for a ride to work when she said she saw the police officer attempting to place Brown in the rear seat of a squad car.
      She then observed the teen, hands in the air, attempt to flee. Several shots were fired at Brown as he ran, Crenshaw said, striking him in the head and chest.
      http://www.mediaite.com/online/police-fatally-shoot-unarmed-black-teenager-outraged-town-protests/
      http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/anger-confrontation-after-fatal-shooting-of-teen-by-ferguson-police/article_04e3885b-4131-5e49-b784-33cd3acbe7f1.html

      Like

  9. Cherpa 1 says:

    I can’t imagine hanging out that much with the ex – husband, boyfriend or partner.

    Like

  10. AirForceBrat says:

    Have they patented his name yet? So when a rapper uses “Big Mike” in a so-called song they can quit their day jobs, too? Or God forbid a rapper uses his vulgar rap lyrics they can buy a new house…..outside of Ferguson that is?!

    Like

  11. Moishe Pipik says:

    It is an established fact, denied by nobody and evident in the security video that Mike Brown is a bully. He bullied that store owner.

    I’m not exaggerating when I say the fact that our President will honor the memory of a bully at the expense of other urgent domestic issues upsets me so much I have been moved to tears.

    Our administration is evil. There’s no other way of putting it.

    Liked by 7 people

    • doodahdaze says:

      Obsessed by Critical Race Theory and Social Justice. The only Silver lining is they are destroying the democrat party.

      Like

    • jello333 says:

      Glad I read through this thread before commenting…. because you said pretty much what I have on my mind. The amount of hatred I feel for all these people (from Obama on down) can’t be healthy. Look at all the attention, the money, the good wishes and “honor” being thrown at people like Trayvon Martin and his family (mostly all scum) and Michael Brown and his family (we don’t yet know much about HIS family, so I’ll wait a bit on a label).

      That glorification of these people is bad enough all by itself. But think about this: How many GOOD people die of unnatural deaths in this country each and every day? How many of them TRULY “innocent” kids, teenagers, young people?! And who pays any attention to it beyond their family and a few close friends? NOBODY! And who throws money and fame at the family of that person? NOBODY!! I can only IMAGINE what the parent of a kid who has recently died must be feeling when they see all this. WHAT ABOUT MY SON?! WHAT ABOUT MY DAUGHTER?!

      So yeah Moishe, I hear ya! I’m so angry that I don’t know if I want to scream or cry.

      Liked by 5 people

      • rashomon says:

        You know what makes me sad and very mad? All the upstanding, law-abiding, great citizens who are minorities in some way or another and having to deal with this $$$T!

        Liked by 2 people

        • auscitizenmom says:

          They are going to have to stick their necks out and start speaking up if they don’t want to live in the middle of this kind of mess. It is a “do it yourself” kind of project.

          Like

  12. yankeeintx says:

    I doubt the $234K will go very far once Crump takes out his expenses. They are going to have to raise much more than that if they hope to be in the same league as Sybrina.

    Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      True,but it has only been 2 weeks so far. Give them time to extort the City of Ferguson.

      Liked by 1 person

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      However look at all the lawyers now involved with all the witnesses!!!
      Not going to be much left for the parents like there was with Trayvon’s parents.

      Like

      • froggielegs says:

        The parents won’t have to pay the witnesses attorney fees. That’s on the witnesses.
        I don’t think Crump will be making as much with this case as he did with Trayvon. There are more people aware of his scheme with this one than there was with George. If Wilson is not indicted, there are no civil suits. If Wilson is indicted, I don’t believe the city will be so quick to pay until the outcome of the case. The HOA with George ‘s case, paid quickly because they thought George was screwed once he was arrested. They foolishly settled before the case was closed.

        Liked by 2 people

  13. Sal Paradise says:

    Unreal…..It’s the cops fault….The cops over-reacted. BS. I hope the cops realize how quickly the left will throw them away, if it fits their agenda……This should serve us well in Nov and going forward. We should have the military as well after Obamas no show…

    Liked by 1 person

    • kinthenorthwest says:

      I posted this on Sunday Open..But it a good Answer to Sal’s post.
      Every 53/58 hours an officer is killed.
      In the first scenario you can see what happened to an officer that let his guard down a bit. (warning its a bit hairy).

      Liked by 1 person

  14. justfactsplz says:

    In this version Paiget says she was waiting on a bus not her employer and that she saw Wilson trying to put Brown in the car to arrest him, not that they tousled through the window. I just wonder if she could be the girlfriend of Darian.
    http://www.vox.com/2014/8/18/6029019/9-essential-facts-about-whats-happening-in-ferguson-missouri-michael-brown

    Like

    • jello333 says:

      We’re gonna need another Dee Dee…

      Like

      • justfactsplz says:

        So far none of their witnesses has been able to tell the same story each time they are interviewed. I have only seen the one man once though. I believe he, Tiffany, and Paiget knows either Mike or Dorian, or possibly both. Paiget likes to run her potty mouth. She will slip up sooner or later and spill all of the beans.

        Liked by 1 person

    • dizzymissl says:

      After reviewing PCs FB page, IMO she could be the GF of anyone male or female. She goes both ways.

      Like

    • John Galt says:

      From her FB page, it appears that she has a girlfriend.

      Liked by 1 person

      • justfactsplz says:

        Well, gee, I must be missing out on all of the fun not doing FB, lol. I’ll settle for what you guys tell me concerning FB.

        Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      I looked through that article, and the SL Post-Dispatch article it linked to,but could only find a small mention of Piaget Crenshaw saying she was waiting on a :”ride” but no mention of a “bus”. Are you certain of this? Did I miss something?

      Like

      • justfactsplz says:

        It might have been another article. I was going through about twenty of them this evening. It stuck in my mind because she had previously said she was waiting on her boss. Let me go back through them and find the one that said bus and get back to you with the link. I thought it was this one.

        Like

        • MouseTheLuckyDog says:

          And Tiffany says she was waiting on an employee.

          Like

        • jason says:


          Interview on CNN with Piaget and Tiffany together. Piaget says she was on the phone with Tiffany, who was coming to pick her up.

          Interview with Tiffany where she states she’s going to pick up her employee that came with her to the studio for interview and later says Piaget (inference is she’s the employee)

          Like

          • justfactsplz says:

            Thanks Jason. I have seen the ones where she said Tiffany was picking her up. That’s why the waiting on the bus one is stuck in my head. I won’t rest until I find it, lol.

            Like

            • jason says:

              pretty sure she says waiting on her boss as opposed to bus but hard as hades to understand what’s being relayed at times so I may not have heard properly lol 🙂

              Like

              • justfactsplz says:

                It wasn’t audio. I read it. So it might have even been a typo. I feel senile tonight anyway. Had three very hyper grandchildren for the week end that about drove me bonkers.

                Like

          • Renee says:

            Tiffany says Piaget saw more than she did. I find that strange because Piaget, just like other witnesses, was going from the window to get her purse and phone. In one interview she seemed to be looking for her phone. How do these people get away with saying they saw the whole thing. They could not because it only lasted seconds and Piaget and the newest male witness both said they left the window right as the confrontation happened in or at the police car. I am saying that so far only Johnson saw the whole thing and he is not credible.

            Like

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        She was saying something in the one Sundance posted about work…ok time to listen again

        Liked by 1 person

      • justfactsplz says:

        I know I read it on one of the links and I thought it was on the one I gave you. I have searched back through and danged if I can find the link now. I know I read she said in one interview that she was waiting on the bus. If I do find it you will be the first to know. Not a lost cause. I read more interesting things while I was searching.

        Like

  15. russo says:

    did anyone check on skittles and tea quite a shock

    Like

  16. myopiafree says:

    Subject: The incredible and un-fair bias of the Washington Post, Sunday, 8/24.
    I object to this bias. The only place I can find the “alternative TRUTH”, is on the “TreeHouse”.
    Here are the two articles:
    1) “There are no perfect victims”. by Mr. Toure. He ignores the Brown the thug, slamming a clerk against the wall – and robbing the place. (That is just what “boys” do.) Then he ASSUMES, “Victim” already, while ignoring the fact that Brown attacked Wilson in his car. (That is just what “gentle giants do”).
    The post has this litany, “… un-armed kid, was not hurting anyone, gunned down with six WHITE police bullets, etc. )
    2) Will Michael Brown become Emmett Till? By Fredreck Harris, Director, African American Politics, Columbia, U.
    Again, he totally ignores all the evidence that Brown demonstrated violent behavior in a store. Further, that he attacked a police officer.
    The self-serving, and convenient blindness of these people, and the Washington post – is staggering.
    At the minimum, they should use the word, “alledged”, and present the ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION.
    They are totally biased.
    I would write a complaint, but I am certain that they would ignore it – feeling that telling the truth, or asking for fair reporting – is “racist”.
    I hate all these lies.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. John Galt says:

    How do they split the proceeds from a joint trashcan tour?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. dizzymissl says:

    New eyewitness report:

    🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  19. justfactsplz says:

    This is an interesting article from someone who ran into Paiget in Manhatten. Paiget was there to do an interview.

    http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/illuminating-sat-night-key-witness-ferguson-shooting-autopsy-update

    Like

      • justfactsplz says:

        What I don’t understand is why she went to New York for the interview. All of the media was in Ferguson and I’m sure they could have found an office to use to tape her segment. She is either related to the Browns, Johnson’s or the Scheme Team, IMO. She has been coached big time. Witness for hire.

        Liked by 1 person

    • nivico says:

      That article references a very early quote from Piaget from an August 10th LA Times article:

      ” Another witness, Piaget Crenshaw, said, “I witnessed the police chase after the guy, full force. He ran for his life. They shot him and he fell. He put his arms up to let them know that he was compliant and he was unarmed, and they shot him twice more and he fell to the ground and died.” ”

      ??? “the police” “they” “them” “they” ???

      Who is this “they” she keeps talking about… it was just the one officer, Officer Wilson.

      And she mentions nothing about seeing a second suspect (Dorian Johnson) running away as well.

      And given the nature of the wounds to Brown’s right arm and shoulder, it’s unlikely he would have been able to even lift that arm.

      Long story short… in this very early account, she seems to be under the distinct impression that there were multiple officers chasing a single suspect, which suggests that she didn’t witness the event at all and is just repeating what she had heard from others.

      This is Selene Bahadoor all over again testifying to what her sister allegedly witnessed.

      Liked by 1 person

      • doodahdaze says:

        A lunatic. She had to be with her BGI funded lawyer. This smells a lot like tampering.

        Like

        • nivico says:

          Unfortunately, if what I’m reading is correct, for it to officially be considered ‘tampering’ under criminal law there has to be a blatant offer to compensate made in exchange for a witness falsifying her testimony…

          …though of course some opinions I read do recognize the inherent problem it presents anyway even if there is no formal conspiracy or meeting of the minds – a witness (like a politician) will naturally tend to align herself with those who are showering her with gifts.

          While it may not be witness tampering, per se, it is definitely witness ‘lobbying’ and it’d be nice if the ABA would address the issue and give a formal opinion on the matter.

          Like

      • justfactsplz says:

        Let’s say she gives a sworn statement to the county detectives and another sworn statement to the FBI and they are different in the facts she states. She could be prosecuted for lying under oath I would think. I hope she keeps talking. It isn’t helping Crumb’s Cause. She’s not very good at being his money maker.

        Like

      • Renee says:

        She could not have seen the whole incident. She was looking for her purse part of the time. Or getting her purse and phone. Either way she moved from looking at the scene to getting purse. The incident only took seconds and she missed several of those seconds.

        Like

        • jason says:

          little timeline I’ve reconstructed from her various interviews:
          Video links/key is at end with approx timeframe. If anyone is good with video editing, was hoping to put something together to give people a visual depiction of the timeline in PC’s own words.

          facebook 1:33 – Piaget saying she’s on phone, tires screech, turns to look out window
          facebook 3:42 I was looking in the first window, I saw the entanglement of the police trying to pull Michael through the window. I then turned around and trying to put together all my things
          Cnn tiffany + PC 5:29 – when I looked out the window, I saw the original tussle going on, I quickly turned and grabbed my purse and tried to run, go to the other window.
          facebook 4:40 – Piaget saw a brief view of entanglement
          MSNBC 2:32 – I heard gunshots fired, I’m like ‘oh my goodness, what’s going on? I gather all my things and look back out the window, at this moment, he’s running, he’s chasing after michael full forcedly down the street.
          MSNBC 2:50 – I went from that window to my balcony.
          CNN New Day 3:07 I’m hearing shots fired ummm, Clearly none of them hit him but… one I did think graze him as they say on the autopsy report and at the end he just turned around after I’m guessing he felt the bullet graze his arm
          facebook 5:33 – this is when I came out my door, I saw Michael turn around (holding hands up before and as she turns) to get shot in the face and the chest and drop to his knees and dropped to his face.
          ===== by her own account, she spends some time looking away from the scene between gathering her purse and moving to a new location. How much did and what exactly did she see? The earlier the report/interview, the less she claims to have witnessed.

          Streamlined version:
          facebook 4:40 – Piaget saw a brief view of entanglement
          Cnn tiffany + PC 5:29 – I quickly turned and grabbed my purse and tried to run, go to the other window.
          MSNBC 2:32 – I heard gunshots fired… I gather all my things and look back out the window, at this moment, he’s running
          MSNBC 2:50 – I went from that window to my balcony.
          facebook 5:33 – this is when I came out my door, I saw Michael turn around (holding hands up before and as she turns) to get shot in the face and the chest

          Links: (put some spaces between the url to prevent the links from embedding.
          MSNBC vid h t t p://w w w.youtube.com/watch?v=PBjMsX8nyNs
          facebook vid h t t ps://w w w.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10202995055419793&set=vb.1306590194&type=2&theater
          CNN tiffany + PC h t t p://w w w.youtube.com/watch?v=advkpZIuq2U

          other vids:
          CNN New Day h t t p://w w w.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2014/08/18/newday-intv-ferguson-shooting-crenshaw.cnn.html
          CNN AC (anderson Cooper) h t t p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FTSPGly6NM
          KDSK h t t p://w w w.ksdk.com/videos/news/local/2014/08/13/14007133/

          Like

  20. truecoiors says:

    For whatever it is worth……

    There have been 3 main witnesses mentioned in the news:

    Dorian Johnson
    Tiffany Mitchell
    Piaget Crenshaw

    Here lately, the news media has been making it sound like these three are unconnected people who are corroborating each other’s stories.

    Not exactly true.

    Piaget and Crenshaw work together. Supposedly, Tiffany driving up to Piaget’s apartment complex right as the shooting was occurring. This was reported back at the time of the shooting, but I have not heard mention of it lately.

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/11/us/missouri-ferguson-michael-brown-what-we-know/

    TC

    Like

  21. justfactsplz says:

    Click on RALLY In NEW YORK on the following link. Paiget was in New York at the rally with all of the Scheme Team.

    http://newyork.cbslocal.com/tag/piaget-crenshaw/

    Like

  22. Bill says:

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/08/did-mo-law-allow-for-deadly-force-arrest-of-mike-brown/

    This is a very good summation of MO. law with respect to law enforcement in using deadly force.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. John Galt says:

    Yet another Dorian version:

    “Brown started running, stopping at one point with his hands up as he cried, “I don’t have a gun, stop shooting!”

    http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/michael-brown-shooting/i-dont-have-gun-witness-says-michael-brown-yelled-n178486

    Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      In your post from free library.
      Threat of ambush is a defense. The cop may have feared ambush by little perp.
      A second consideration is the threat of ambush, particularly when an officer is unable to keep the fleeing suspect in sight. Annual statistics disclose the number of officers killed as the result of ambush, frequently occurring during foot pursuits of fleeing suspects.(12)

      Here the officer had been beaten senseless in broad daylight by a drug crazed perp. He had a reasonable fear of passing out then the perp would take his gun.
      Third, even in cases where a suspect is not believed to be armed with a deadly weapon, the potential threat of the suspect’s gaining access to the officer’s weapon cannot be discounted. Although officers are generally trained in defensive tactics and weapon retention, even well-trained officers can lose control of their firearms in the course of a physical struggle.
      A resisting suspect intent on seizing an officer’s sidearm has a simpler task than does the officer, who faces the broader challenge of overcoming resistance while retaining the firearm. The number of officers killed each year with their own service weapons continues to highlight the gravity of the problem.(13)

      Like

    • LetJusticePrevail" says:

      Would an odd thing to say… “I don’t have a fun”… unless he had threatened to shoot Darren Wilson while he was punching him in his own patrol car. Perhaps while he was trying to take Wilson’s service weapon.

      Like

  24. doodahdaze says:

    Seems Crump has a direct pipeline the Obwana and the Oval Edifice.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Sandra says:

    Has anyone found out where Tiffany and Piaget work? Not trying to dox, I’m just wondering what business would have Tiffany as a boss and administer drug tests to employees. On second thought, I think the employer might want to know that Piaget admitted to cheating her drug test.

    Like

  26. Sandra says:

    Apparently the MTV Video Music Awards had a tribute to Ferguson. lol Yah, a tribute to a thug who decided to assault a police officer. Keepin’ it classy, MTV! I missed it, which is probably good because I would have likely hurled. I had turned twice to the VMAs, the first time there was a band performing, all guys who looked and sounded like girls, crappy music too, and then the second time was when Beyonce was performing and it was so disgusting and so pathetic I went back to watching Hoarders which was far more interesting. Anyone see the tribute? Was the BGI gang all there? I guess not, they were in STL at their wastebasket tour stop.

    Like

  27. Sandra says:

    Yet another variation of Piaget’s story, http://fox17online.com/2014/08/14/more-violence-and-new-eyewitness-reports-follow-deadly-shooting-of-teen/

    On Saturday, Tiffany Mitchell drove to Ferguson to pick up an employee for work just in time to see Brown tussling at the window of a police vehicle. She and the employee, Piaget Crenshaw, told CNN’s Don Lemon late Wednesday about Brown’s last moments. Their accounts corroborate a previous witness’ account. Crenshaw later shot cell phone video of the aftermath, which CNN has obtained from affiliate KMOV. After Mitchell called Piaget Crenshaw to let her know she had arrived, Crenshaw looked out the window, spotting Brown and the officer. It looked like they were arm wrestling, she said.

    But in the raw video of Piaget’s interview with the media, she said she heard squealing tires outside of her apartment and she thought it was Tiffany who was coming to pick her up, but when she looked out she saw the police vehicle. I don’t recall any mention of Tiffany calling her.

    Like

    • froggielegs says:

      Sandra, that’s my local news station. From experience with local news, don’t believe half of what they write. Notice it’s a Fox channel but they are using a CNN interview… just saying 🙂 LOL.

      Like

  28. froggielegs says:

    Hmm I don’t know about anyone else but, this article doesn’t show “Big Mike” in a very good light. Sure they try to claim he had his coming to Jesus moment but that is totally lost in all the other stuff it says about him. Saying he “dabbled” in drugs and alcohol, moved around to 2 – 3 different high school (that in and of itself says there’s a problem), got in a fight with a neighborhood guy, had a “rebellious streak” where his Mom gave him her ATM card to buy new shoes and instead he bought a playstation, used his size to intimidate people, spoke often on his FB page how his friends treat him better than family, etc. Too many things in this article to list. You have to read it all!

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/25/us/michael-brown-spent-last-weeks-grappling-with-lifes-mysteries.html

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mist'ears Mom says:

      NY Times again…who the h3ll is Mr. Brown? gimme a break.

      Like

    • jello333 says:

      “used his size to intimidate people” (beyond just the store owner?)

      It says THAT? That’s a big deal, majorly big deal.

      Like

      • froggielegs says:

        The exact wording is…

        “Mr. Brown rarely got into physical confrontations, Mr. Lewis said, because he was so big that nobody really wanted to test him. Mr. Brown tended to use his size to scare away potential trouble, Mr. Lewis said.

        “He’ll swell up like, ‘I’m mad,’ and you’ll back off,” he said.”

        While they tried to make it sound like he did it for protection, the last sentence says otherwise. That basically says he used his size to intimidate people.

        Liked by 1 person

  29. doodahdaze says:

    The Crumped up paid witnesses will have to face the grand jury alone. Unprotected by the crooked Crump Scheme lawyers. They will fall apart on the stand. Unlike a trial with Bernie trying to save them and objecting. Also hearsay is OK in the Grand Jury. If the cops dig out one of their informants he can testify as to what the Crumped witnesses may have let out of the bag in the project. This is why Crump fears the Grand Jury so much. His knees be a knokin’.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jello333 says:

      I’m praying that the GJ digs up some of the Scheme Team’s PAST indiscretions… circa 2012-2013! I’d give anything to see this headline a months from now:

      “Grand Jury Declines to Indict Darren Wilson — Recommends Related Indictment of Former Trayvon Martin Attorneys”

      Like

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Like

    • myopiafree says:

      Hi Doo Dah,
      I agree. The Grand Jury will hear it all – and it is about time. We all recognize the intense political pressure to find, “probable cause”, based on all the FALSE STORIES that have been told and repeated endlessly by the incompetent Washington Post News Paper. Very slowly it will become clear that Officer Wilson was attacked in his cruiser, by an apparently “deranged” person, and then, after walking 35 feet away, and yelling insults, choose to continued his “deranged” behavior and stupidly CHARGED the officer, giving Wilson no choice but to fire at the “center of mass”, to stop this charging felon. When this truth comes out, in mid-October, and the G. J. says, no probable cause, there will be more cover-up lying, that says that the G. J. was “racist”, and hateful towards blacks. Then more riots will develop, and assaults will continue but these idiots.

      Like

  30. Sandra says:

    This is the closest I’ve seen to MB being portrayed as an angel:

    Like

    • Sandra says:

      Is there anything useful here? http://instagram.com/p/roAGd6Gu9V/ It appears to be some kind of video but I can’t get it to play.

      Like

    • jello333 says:

      I wish some of Emmitt Till’s relatives would come out and say STOP comparing him to the other two!! It’s just sick and insulting.

      Like

      • libby says:

        A = B = C is what they are saying.
        Saint skittles = saint swisher = til?
        Mathematically, there is a lot of inference here.
        Not exactly proof, but a=b=c is coming from the social justice types.
        Could be.smearing til. Or or or.
        The race uhstle.aint new. Its just refined.
        Enhanced.

        Like

        • jello333 says:

          Oh don’t get me wrong. I’ve heard the stories (and generally believe it) that Emmitt wasn’t a little angel, that he could be an arrogant kid who liked to run his mouth. I get that. My gripe isn’t so much about the comparisons of the guys who were killed in these cases…. it’s about the killers. And forget about Wilson, I still know almost nothing about him. Just look at George! Comparing him to Till’s killers, and what/why he did to Trayvon vs what the scumbags did to Till…. THAT is where I have my major issues with those who like to link it all together.

          Like

    • Sandra says:

      I think we saw this before, but just in case we didn’t. The person who wrote the comment, vontee, deleted his tweet, but it’s still visible in other peoples’ tweets. what I find interesting is the timing, someone retweeted it at 2:47pm so vontee must have tweeted it earlier. How did vontee know about the cigarellos and the theft so soon after the shooting?

      I have got to go to bed! I hate when I start seeing interesting stuff after midnight.

      Like

      • TeddyOn20th says:

        There was something about the theft in the comments on Piaget’s Facebook immediately after the incident, and it was followed up by someone saying that he hadn’t stolen anything.

        Like

      • myopiafree says:

        By “Sir Fuller”,
        Yes – these people know that Brown was either “on drugs”, deranged, or just stupid. You do not do what Brown did – and expect to never be “caught”. The fact that this Brown-idiot was waking down the middle of the road, is even more stupid. Of course he is going to be stopped – what the hell would you expect?? Wilson was only doing what any police officer would be expected to do. If he did not do it – he would be fired from the police force. To raise this de-ranged Brown to “Saint Hood”, is insane. For Obama to send representatives to his “State” funeral”, says a lot about Obama’s distorted mind – in a very direct way. Army General killed in defense of the USA? Who gives a damn, certainly not Obama.

        Like

  31. froggielegs says:

    Check out Mike Mike’s FB friend’s page. Has a few posts offering to sell things he looted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sandra says:

      Just think, the White House reps are going to the funeral tomorrow to celebrate the culture of black Ferguson and to mourn the loss of one of its finest citizens. (Where is that hurling emoticon when I need it?!)

      Like

      • AirForceBrat says:

        A 2 star General dies in combat=No White House in attendance at his funeral and a few pictures in the news/social media.
        An American journalist is murdered by ISIS=A mere mention in the news about a Catholic memorial that took place over the weekend.
        A felon that assaulted a police and assaulted a store clerk after robbing him is put in the ground=3 White House attendees, national coverage on ALL major networks, MTV VMA tribute, and millions of impressionable young children who “Wanna be like Mike”!!!
        Thanks Obama for setting the priorities straight!

        Like

  32. froggielegs says:

    If she is paying for the funeral, then why are the collecting money to pay for it on the gofundme site?

    BTW for those who don’t know, she is Russell Simmons ex. He married her when she was 17 and still in high school and he was 35.

    Like

  33. realitycheck says:

    When will the real Bar association ban attorney’s from spreading lies? In these cases , the BGI gets out front, presents IT’s story and the media puts it out there. The police do not have time to fully investigate and/or get all facts before the scenario is set. The police do not normally release information on investigations until trial or the conclusion of the investigation yet these scumbag attorney’s spread their lies that the naive public believes its all true. The first story people hear is hat they remember.
    There should be some kind of accountability or restrictions to the attorney’s and the media’s lies and jumps to conclusion. (Crump still is saying execution of Michael Brown, the punk needs to be held accountable for causing this type of fiasco and inflaming tensions with his lies).)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s