Cultural Marxism is modern political correctness on steroids:

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.“ 

The recent terrorist attack in London, England, not unlike the Fort Hood shooting, highlight the insufferable refusal of the delusional, illogical, minority – liberals – to accept what confronts them:   Traditional Islamists bent on killing non-Muslims.

British Prime Minister, David Cameron, says the recent beheading of the U.K. Soldier in the street outside the army base is merely a “betrayal of Islam”.    No, that is simply trying to pick up the turd by the clean end.  

The attack was not a “betrayal of Islam”, this is Islam witnessed.

Even the Somali home base of the terrorists themselves take exception to the framework of the prime minister.    These tweets are from al-Qaeda’s, al-shabaab, PR arm:

The liberal minority crew in London are surrounded by hatred;  Hatred of them, of anything that represents freedom or Western values, for their mere existence.   Yet, they insufferably refuse to accept it.

Consider this response from the British government:

Commanders have advised troops not to wear uniform travelling to and from work or outside bases following the brutal killing of a member of the military close to Woolwich barracks.

Defence sources said the order had been given that uniform should not be worn by those travelling alone, or on public transport as a “common sense precaution” immediately after the killing.  (link)

Instead of immediately confronting the terrorists for what they are, the modern liberal mentality is to look at better ways to stop yourself from becoming a victim of them.

Think about that?

Terrorism is, at its root, a demand by someone -in this case al-Qaeda- for your activity to change.   If a British soldier cannot walk the streets in the uniform of his service, well, who’s winning?

This is not dissimilar to the arguments made in the Trayvon Martin VS. George Zimmerman discussions where people say George Zimmerman should not have gotten out of his car.    In essence the message conveyed is you have no right to act freely, lest you put yourself in a position of being attacked for the expression of your freedom.  We called this “The Safari Principle“:

THE SAFARI PRINCIPLE  – George Zimmerman left his vehicle, oh my!

The hidden subtext could be construed as the following… In modern America, a prudent citizen should know to remain in their vehicle, doors locked, windows up, when there are young black males known to be in the vicinity.

What does this say about our society?

Are we living in a drive through Safari Park?

If we get out of our vehicles we deserve what we get and shouldn’t blame the animals, much less shoot them in self-defense?

In essence what you have is an ideology espoused by a mindset similar to Melissa Harris-Perry, Natalie Jackson, Joy-Ann Reid, and now David Cameron.  Foaming at the mouth calling anyone who profiles risk, based on behavior, a racist, or Islamaphobe.

While at the same time saying that we, the community of non-violent ordinaries, are all at fault for not following the rules they will write for us on the Safari Park safety brochure.

Islamists, like violent culturally aggressive thugs, are viewed as the big cats in the Safari, and all others are transient passers by who must acquiesce to the violent proclivities of the thugs lest they be blamed for their own beheading.

Stay in the car = Don’t wear your uniform.   The message is the same.

The emphasis is profoundly on the wrong syllable.

I hate to be argumentative but I fundamentally disagree with the Islamist/Thug premise that we, by our very existence, deserve to be victimized and/or killed.

If you think this contagion is not deadly consider this:  The Absence Of The Word Islam

What does a murderous jihadist terrorist have to do to get some recognition for his cause? You hack a British soldier to death in broad daylight on a London street while shouting “Allahu akbar” and then “swear by the almighty Allah” that you’ll never stop fighting, and the U.S. broadcast networks still can’t bring themselves to utter a word about Islam.

True, the ABC, CBS and NBC evening broadcasts called the attack “terrorism,” but for all the information they gave viewers, the attackers might have been Basque separatists or animal rights zealots.  (link)