Finally !!!!! – Someone (Chris Wallace) Asks Where Was The President During The Benghazi attack….

Obama_seal

Seven months we’ve been waiting for someone, anyone, to ask the White House staff what was President Obama doing on the night the Benghazi attacks took place.    We have researched this on our own and have him tracked from 4pm to around 7:30pm (EST).  But after 7:30pm it is a total BLACKOUT – an unknown void of information.

Finally after seven MONTHS.  Chris Wallace asks White House Communications Director, Dan Pfeiffer, what was President Obama doing.  [Please watch this video clip in its entirety before continuing]

Of course Dan Pfeiffer pulls the familiar “what difference does it make” angle, with his claim that it is an “irrelevant fact“.

WRONG – they are hiding what actually took place that night.   They are desperately trying to cover the President’s intentional uninvolvement.

The two people, the National Security Advisors, you keep hearing Dan Pfeiffer refer to in that video clip with Wallace are, Tom Donilon and Denis McDonough.

Perhaps now the media has accepted the fact that the “talking points” were highly manipulated, they will turn their investigative eye onto the origin, and subsequently on to something we outlined earlier:

benghazi4

Back in January we posted a discussion around a newly released photo from the White House. The picture was taken in the oval office on Sept 11th 2012, the date of the Benghazi attack.

At the time we thought the picture was worth a thousand words. After research, and with the hindsight of the latest revelations, it appears we were correct. Yet again, it provides more sunlight into the events surrounding the Benghazi, Libya events and who made the critical decisions in those moments of crisis.

At 5pm, according to the White House and media reports, President Obama was set for a prior scheduled meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey. It was just prior to this meeting that White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon tells President Obama of the attack and the fire at the main villa…

…..how long the meeting took is unknown, but we do know by 6:30pm President Obama and Joe Biden were on the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

White House 9-11-12

(Sept. 11, 2012)”Denis McDonough, Deputy National Security Advisor, left, updates the President and Vice President on the situation in the Middle East and North Africa. National Security Advisor Tom Donilon and Chief of Staff Jack Lew are at right.” (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The picture above was taken at exactly 7:28:16pm DC time. It was dusk outside, and President Obama had just completed a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Why is this important? Because we know the conversation lasted an hour.

Sept 11, 2012 President Obama spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu for an hour tonight as a part of their ongoing consultations. The two leaders discussed the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear program, and our close cooperation on Iran and other security issues. (link)

So we know the phone call began at around 6:30pm and ended just before 7:28pm.

What is equally important is what was taking place in Libya (Benghazi) during the time the Netanyahu phone call took place.

The attack against the CIA/State Dept. Consulate began at 3:40pm D.C. time. So this phone call between Benjamin Netanyahu and President Obama started three hours after the attack began.

What is also revealing about this photograph is who was where, why, and what decisions were being made.

It might seem odd that both President Obama and Vice-President Biden would simultaneously be tied up, indeed it is a breach of previously established security protocols for this exact “crisis” and “leadership need” reason.

But, they are used to doing it all the time – and besides, what are the odds of something actually being urgent while they are both engaged, and needing one of them immediately.

Indeed the odds are slim. Slim, but this was one of those moments when it actually existed; and had massive consequences.

You can see the phone notes in the hands of Joe Biden. Actually if you enhance the picture and zoom in on the notes you can see they are notes, in Biden’s handwriting, of the phone call discussion contents between Netanyahu and Obama. Whether or not BiBi knew Biden was also on the call is unknown, but he was indeed taking copious notes.

biden hands

(on the left you see the notes from Biden 9/11/12 – on the right you see notes from Biden taken during the Vice-Presidential debate)

Context of Netanyahu Phone Call: It is important to remember how much flack President/Candidate Obama was getting from the opposition about his previously ignoring Netanyahu around the BiBi United Nations speech.

This call was perceived as important by both the Obama Campaign and White House advisors to a defensive pro-Israel narrative. It could not be skipped by a candidate needing to assure the Jewish electorate of his Israel-Cred. So from 6:30pm to 7:26 pm both Vice-President, Joe Biden, and President Obama, were “indisposed”.

This phone call took place between 12:30pm and 1:26am Benghazi time. Again, three hours after the attack began at 9:40pm. By the time the picture was taken at 7:26pm (DC) Ambassador Stevens was widely known to be missing – perhaps killed.

According to numerous reports, in Benghazi, around the same time, CIA operatives and former SEAL’s Tyrone Woods and Glenn Doherty were returning from the Consulate complex to the CIA annex with the body of State Dept. Aide to Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith. Ambassador Stevens was missing.

Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith

Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith

In Libya, during this Oval Office call, Woods and Doherty were setting up defensive positions on the roof of the CIA annex building and maintaining a defensive perimeter while calling for more support.

Annex w-backgate

So we know POTUS and VPOTUS were out-of-the-decision-loop. Who was making the decisions on behalf of the Commander and Chief?

Back to the timeline – and remember, this is the TIMED VERSION initially released to the media:

(5 p.m. D.C.): Just ahead of the weekly meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey, White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon tells President Obama of the attack and the fire at the main villa….

(6:07 p.m. D.C): An alert from the State Dept. Operations Center states that the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli reports the Islamic military group “Ansar al-Sharia Claims responsibility for Benghazi Attack”… “on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli.”

(6:30 p.m. D.C.) : The Pentagon issues an order to a special operations team in Europe to move to Sigonella, Sicily – less than one hour’s flight away from Benghazi…. [Obama and Biden are now on the phone with Netanyahu] Who is in charge?

(7 p.m. D.C.): The first of two unmanned U.S. Predator drones, which already had been flying over eastern Libya, is diverted to Benghazi, as reported by CBS News’ Sharyl Attkisson and David Martin on Oct. 15. [Obama and Biden are still on the phone with Netanyahu] Who is in charge?

(7:30 p.m. D.C.): A U.S. security team from Embassy Tripoli lands in Benghazi and learn that the ambassador is missing. They try to arrange for transportation into town, with the goal of locating Stevens. [Phone call over – Obama and Biden are being updated by Denis McDonough as per the picture]

White House 9-11-12 Donilon - McDonough

But who was representing the Commander In Chief ? During that critical hour?

(From 2011) With little to no experience guiding them, everything becomes a first-impression type situation to Obama’s inner crew. To the point, Henry Kissinger reportedly, refers to Obama’s group of advisers as, “kids.” […]

One of Obama’s closest advisers is his Deputy National Security Adviser. The person acting the part of Deputy National Security Adviser is one Denis McDonough. While McDonough enjoys the credentials of a well-educated 41-year-old, he has sparse work experience. Working on the hill as a legislative aide before transferring to a liberal think tank before campaigning for Obama before becoming Deputy National Security Adviser, is good for McDonough but embarrassing to the position which he holds. […]

McDonough has a reputation around D.C. – as a rabid mind-fixer in his mission to ‘set the record straight’ with democratic politicians and mainstream media types, who dare veer off the political reservation. It’s rather humorous in a way to see a glorified political functionary like McDonough act the part of a seasoned and experienced political heavyweight. McDonough was promoted out of ideological loyalty over convention. Try telling McDonough that and he’ll likely piss ideological vinegar all over you. But the thing with McDonough’s verbal piss, it doesn’t stain things, it can’t… it’s too inexperienced.

Above said, guess who is guiding Obama on the crisis in Egypt and the pending melt-down in the Middle East? If you guessed the low cal aperitivo named Denis McDonough, you would be correct. The United States’ official response to the crisis in Egypt has so far been one big massive embarrassment. President Obama is getting bad advice; advice that is fueling his ideological ego; advice that is clearly immature in nature and devoid of geopolitical experience. (link)

Perhaps this insight from Newt Gingrich , after he spoke to a “key senator” provides some clarity to the “fog”:

“There is a rumor — I want to be clear, it’s a rumor — that at least two networks have emails from the National Security Adviser’s office [Denis McDonough? or Tom Donilon?] telling a counterterrorism group to stand down,” [Newt] Gingrich said.” (link)

Newt Gingrich was specifically talking about his knowledge of a communication known by at least one Senator, and given to two media outlets – who did not use it. It makes sense:

Did Denis McDonough tell people to “stand down” while POTUS and VPOTUS were on the phone with BiBi and unable to be interrupted ?

At 7:26pm (DC) 1:30am (Benghazi) -when this picture was taken – Ty Woods and Glen Doherty were fighting for their lives.

While Denis McDonough was bringing POTUS up to speed, at that exact moment, events in Benghazi had spiraled. What took place next, and why they did not reverse the “stand down call” is unknown.

Perhaps, as they later espoused ad infinitum, they considered it too late, after all, this 7:26pm update probably revealed the status of Ambassador Stevens as “Missing presumed Dead”.

Damage control time….. Here comes the origin of the talking points…..

Denis McDonough jumped into action and provided the good cover story.

The cover story already existed because earlier in the same day the State Dept was getting questioned about the attack in Cairo, Egypt. Again, at another embassy – and a story had already begun about a U-Tube video.

McDonough just needed to continue the same narrative story.

Which he did, effectively, the following day: [McDonough on Sept 12th]

“This work takes on added urgency given the truly abhorrent video that has offended so many people–Muslims, and non-Muslims alike—in our country and around the world.” (link)

There you have McDonough, the next day, attaching the little known U-Tube video from the Cairo Embassy explanation, directly to the Benghazi, Libya attack.

What followed in the days, weeks, and even months ahead, was just a continuance of the same manufactured explanation during the “peak” of the 2012 election cycle.

After all, it was this same 41-year-old “kid”, McDonough, who was the key deflector between POTUS and the crisis that was “Fast and Furious“:

“Investigative journalists have provided details on McDonough’s background and work history in politics, but the information that makes McDonough relevant to the continually breaking news on the Fast and Furious scandal is his role in silencing complaints from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)…” (link)

What’s more likely? Flawed intelligence, or having already succeeded in stemming the investigative crisis that became “Fast and Furious, McDonough just applied the same mindset and skillset to the Benghazi crisis. Creating a firewall between the absence of executive leadership during the critical crisis hours, and the State Dept/DoD failed response.

If the media would set their mind to it they might find this picture is worth “A Thousand Words” indeed:

White House 9-11-12 Donilon - McDonough

benghazi-massacre-blog-copy

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Military, Obama re-election, Obama Research/Discovery, Secretary of State, Sept 11, Susan Rice, Terrorist Attacks, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

63 Responses to Finally !!!!! – Someone (Chris Wallace) Asks Where Was The President During The Benghazi attack….

  1. Coast says:

    There is a huge difference between someone that is being kept “up to date” vs. someone that takes the lead, or directly involves themselves in making real decisions. Obama did nothing…being advised of the situation vs. taking charge/action is hugely different. This administration is a total lie and fake.

    Like

  2. Sharon says:

    Chris Wallace asked a question that was never answered.

    Congress has the authority and responsibility to stop this rogue government, and has had for some time now, as I understand it. They are not stopping this rogue government because they are part of it. They are part of it by their failure to act.

    Like

    • mcfyre2012 says:

      “Chris Wallace asked a question that was never answered.”

      That’s exactly right. He never answered the question.

      I watched the interview and I thought Pfeiffer was the absolute wrong person for the administration to use for the cover-up. Rather than diffuse it, he makes it look worse than we think it is.

      Like

      • doodahdaze says:

        Oh well it is Sunday. Here is where he was.

        Like

      • Sharon says:

        As long as Pfeiffer is pleasing his handlers, and his handlers are pleasing their handlers, it doesn’t matter if they make it look “worse than we think it is.” He doesn’t make it look worse than I think it is. They don’t mind exposure, because they hold positions of power.

        They don’t mind being shown to be liars. They are in charge.

        They don’t mind having to testify at Congressional hearings. They have fundamentally transformed America, and Congress has stood by for years as they have done that.

        What’s “happening to them” is not escalating: all they have to do is stand fast in their tracks. Shame and conscience and responsibility have no place in their world. Something about our tendency to be encouraged by their exposure and the hearings is, I think, dependent on shame and conscience. Not relevant.

        And they are in places of authority, and Valerie Jarrett has not been heard from. Not cynicism. Not sarcasm. I’d love to be proved wrong. But I will not cheer when professional liars are “cornered” and (in our world) embarrassed, because it does not change the equation of the day. It does not change who’s in charge.

        Like

        • Judy says:

          WELL SAID!

          Like

        • St. Benedict's Thistle says:

          I agree. Lacking shame or a conscience, these people will not willingly surrender power.

          That said, I do believe the pendulum may be about to swing in a new direction. Let us pray.

          Like

        • mcfyre2012 says:

          I agree. Shameless is a word I have associated with the obama regime for several years. They have not one ounce of shame. That can only be because they have no conscious or soul.

          Like

  3. rocker124 says:

    This is an article that is fascinating about how Clinton handled a crisis and how Obama is copying that style.
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/05/benghazi_narrative_shift_was_perfectly_clintonian.html

    Like

    • rocker124 says:

      That article is by Jack Cashill and is great. This article is also good, but the comments are really great. I hope people read both.

      http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/05/capital_powerball_scandals_grease_washingtons_wheels.html

      Like

      • doodahdaze says:

        Well as I have been saying. This is a coordinated response to Citizens United. The President even said so. The left hated it. The President even said he would take all action he could to stop it. This is the result. It is easy if you listen to what they say and apply it to what they do. There is no big mystery here if you have a brain. It is top down. Now they will have to track back from bottom up. To get to what they all already know. Amazing.

        Like

      • doodahdaze says:

        Also it was $$$$ They not only got the SAM’S we bought from them but they got the SAM’S back. The real story here is about the SAM missiles. Where are they? Who has them?

        Like

      • ctdar says:

        From one of the comments, a question that I have wondered about what happened when Woods & Doherty set up to paint the targets… where are the drone tapes, dont drones have
        black boxes ?:
        Also was the drone armed and when Woods and Doherty lit up their lazer to shine on an enemy position did the drone fire on them? Inquiring minds….

        Like

  4. waltherppk says:

    See how much mileage those kind of evasive non answers get in front of the select committee.

    Like

  5. ctdar says:

    I posted most of below on previous thread re Patrick Kennedy but figured here’s a good spot too since it mentions who’s in charge & protocol required for any deviation to chain of command.
    ctdar says:
    May 19, 2013 at 7:17 pm
    Obama needs to be held accountable, doesn’t matter if the administration throws Kennedy under the bus, the order can only originate from the top and if it didn’t he should be held accountable for shirking his duties as commander in chief. The only time the President can pass the responsibility of the country to someone else in the line of succession to give or not give the order regarding mobilizing the troops would be if Obama was physically/mentally incapacitated(ie Regan when he went into surgery); paperwork would need to be signed & successor “sworn in” in order to facilitate the change in command.
    Being on a telephone call or otherwise MIA does not change the fact that Obama was derelict in his duties. Whether abroad or within the US, a terrorist attack is an attack of war and should be treated as such….not fckn a game.
    The public unfortunately elected Obama as president no one else. If Obama is allowing someone else to be making & giving orders for the USA than he should be impeached as that person (whoever it is) was not elected last November & duly sworn in.

    Like

  6. ctdar says:

    Wallace asked Pfeiffer point blank “where was Obama” Pfeiffer answered he was in the WH that day. When Wallace followed up with where was he that night? Pfeiffer tap danced and never answered. Let’s hope Wallace’s line of question is the start of the thunderous & ominous question:
    WHERE WAS OBAMA ON THE NIGHT OF THE BENGHAZI MASSACRE??

    Like

  7. pspinach says:

    No other presidents seem to have targetted any specific groups of Americans. They represented safety for all Americans. Every singly Obama scandal to date have one thing in common: Aiding and comforting muslims at the expense of specific groups of Americans. These groups of Americans are the Christians, Caucasians and the Military. He wages war against these groups in favor of non-Americans such as Mexicans and Muslims, which is treasonous because the former groups are Americans. It’s very clear and right in front of our eyes.

    The AP scandal was due to Obama trying to suppress terrorist information and danger from Americans.

    In Benghazi, he didn’t provide direction because he wanted the Americans to die while saving the muslims in Libya.

    He sent guns to Muslim rebels without consulting with Congress because he KNEW it would be rejected. It progressed to Benghazi and Americans died and were at great peril, only saved by the actions of ex-Seals who disobeyed.

    You can put a finger on Obama sending in an Arab cleric to the 37 Navy Seals who died in Extortion 17. This is absolute treason. Obama has to be indicted for treason first. All else follows.

    Of course, it will go nowhere unless the God less learn their lessons. Unfortunately that’s what it takes.

    Like

  8. pspinach says:

    The god less includes Congress, lawyers, liberals, etc.

    Like

  9. mooney1el says:

    I wanted to scream at the TV during this interview I wanted Wallace to ask Pfeiffer what was more important than being Commander and Chief and leading the charge? You said he was being “kept up-to-date”, what else was he doing? What could have been more important than running the show trying to keep brave Americans alive? I don’t really care what room he was in, could have been the bathroom……it makes no difference, he was not in charge during the critical time of this tragedy and somehow he determined that something else was more important. In my book, nothing should be more important for the Commander n Chief than the unfolding battle.

    Also, I wanted to know when the POTUS was told that no FEST was deployed? When did the decision makers cancel the POTUS’ order to “send in reinforcements”? What was his reaction when told that his order had not been carried out?

    Like

    • pspinach says:

      They cannot say Obama was not in charge because there is damning info – a photo of him at 7:26 pm getting a briefing. At 7:30 pm, the stand down order was received by Hicks which held back the reinforcements arriving at Benghazi from Tripoli from completing their call of duty. All word was GO to help the consulate staff under attack, until 7:30. Obama called on Nigerians to go easy on jihadists just this week. His whole body etat is to preserve muslims. Even better if Americans die.

      Like

    • sundance says:

      We all want to scream at the TV….. Because, believe it or not, most of us know more about the darned issues than the people asking the questions…. That’s why they never ask the questions that need asking. The opportunities just pass on by…. over-and-over-and-over, yet again…

      The media has increasingly become irrelevant in the extreme, and oddly enough it continues to worsen.

      Riddle me this: Regarding the Sunday Talk Shows….. The media is supposed to be competing for viewership right? So you would think the content would drive the viewership… and/or a unique substantive content driven program would crush the blah-blah-blah blathering talking heads…. right? Yet, it doesn’t matter which one you watch, the same topics, the same content, the same questions, heck the exact same people are on each one every Sunday.

      Why is that?

      Like

      • LittleLaughter says:

        Sundance, You are exactly correct in your statement that most of us know more about the issues than the people asking the questions. There was a time when I would plop my tired rear end on the sofa after a long day at work and turn on Fox news. I wanted to hear what the issues were and what actions were being taken (or not). After I began reading here, as well as a few other places, I would find that, time and time again, the people asking the questions, or stating the “facts”, were WAY off base. They didn’t know even the basics. How then, I pondered, would they be able to get to the bottom of anything?? Fair and Balanced is now Fog and Brain Damaged. I like Glen Beck, but cannot get his channel. I read his site daily, as well as here and The AMerican Thinker.

        Like

      • pspinach says:

        You got me there, Sir! I’m stumped too. Look at this chart which shows much larger circles for negative news on Benghazi, IRS and AP scandals, and yet Obummer’s popularity in the weeks following is only 3 points lower.

        The jerk sees this and says, heck, let’s keep partying at the WH!

        It seems to me, people are half asleep. Awareness levels are low because of strong denial. Try telling them that Obama is not a black JFK, Michelle wears an ugly wig, Ted Kennedy son of JFK is a murderer, and they just cannot bear it. So they go through the day, half awake, mindlessly running the same topics over and over again, because to be awake to reality takes courage. For the life of me, I could never understand how folks could see Bill Clinton as JFK. They grew up brainwashed that the Democrat Party was the soul of politics. To hear that Democrats were the KKK and that Andrew Jackson first ever Democrat president left a trail of tears massacreing the indigenous is beyond their ability. They MUST believe their beliefs were not incorrect. The truth seeps in slowly, comes to the surface in bits only to be suppressed and great anger or the half lid occurs if you mention it.

        It has to hit close to home. The AP controversy hits the journalists. The IRS controversy hits every American. So those get more attention than Benghazi or Extortion 17 regardless of whether lives were lost. Fortunately, the mindful are the 53% but it just isn’t enough against the Culture of Intimidation and Corruption.

        Like

        • boutis says:

          It takes the public a varying amount of time to process this type of information. Cognitive dissonance is hard to overcome. Most of us were already aware of many abuses of this administration and are not that surprised (I’m not surprised at all) at their methods and lawlessness in stifling all forms of dissent, punishing enemies, and politicizing every function of government. It also takes time for busy people to become aware of hearings, etc. There is a core of believers who will never accept what is before their eyes, but growing numbers will see it and it is already terrifying Democrats especially with regards to 2014 elections. I have to remind myself of this also and be patient.

          Like

      • St. Benedict's Thistle says:

        Alas, if only it was groupie blindness. However, the press always…always knows much more than what is reported to the hoi polloi. In many ways, they are as thick as thieves with our leaders. Even those who would like to report the truth are hindered by their editors, managers and media moguls who control the purse strings, can make or break a career, and so on.

        It is much easier to pretend that certain unpleasant facts are not true, to feign a sort of arrogance about the ‘fringe’ and to keep one’s job and social standing in the milieu of news and politics.

        Sickening and soul-killing to anyone who seeks the truth; hence not many truth seekers are professional journalists.

        Like

  10. ctdar says:

    Just a correction to above thread, Woods was already at Annex & led a rescue
    team to Benghazi Mission where they rescued survivors & retrieved the body of Smith than returned to the annex. Dougherty had commissioned a flight for $30K with his own cash from Tripoli to Benghazi & arrived with additional reinforcements shortly after Woods returned from the rescue of those at the Mission.
    http://www.examiner.com/article/revealed-what-happened-to-ambassador-stevens-body

    Like

  11. janc1955 says:

    I think both Obama and laughing Joe were on the call with Netanyahu because Obama had no relationship with him and as we know from smilin Joe during the VP debate, he and Bibi are *likethis*. They’re bros. BFFs. My guess is blustering Joe was greasing the skids for his boss on that call. Meanwhile, Benghazi burned while some minor member of the skill-free administration issued the stand-down order because their knee-jerk response is always to protect their political asses first, and their M.E. friends second. Americans under fire by a bunch of savage terrorists is way, way down the priority list.

    I don’t think Obama or any of the rookies on his staff were immediately able to grasp the seriousness of the situation in Benghazi, and brain-free Biden was too busy basking in the glow of his involvement on the Netanyahu call to catch a clue about what was going down over there.

    Of course, what they seem to be actually good at is putting up smoke and mirrors to confuse the idiot electorate, so once they had their belated aHA moment that Benghazi was a Bad Thing, they immediately got busy deciding which ridiculous lie they would chum the media waters with, and the YouTube video lie won the day. They ran with it.

    Many months after the attack in Benghazi, and many ridiculous lies later, they are now chanting in unison that the continued focus on the attack is a Republican-orchestrated political circus. It’s typical. It’s predictable. It’s downright boring.

    I’m praying for however many more scandals are necessary to start impeachment proceedings.

    Like

    • I think that both Obama and laughing Joe were on the phone with Netanyahu for that length of time to establish “plausible deniability”. I think they both had very good intel on what was happening in Benghazi; in fact, I think they had good intel on that for quite some time before anything happened in Benghazi. They knew what was happening, and either left it to underlings to “make the calls” or coached them ahead of time. My money’s on the latter. Remember, these are evil-driven sociopaths we’re talking about here. Nothing is beyond them.

      BHO didn’t “go to sleep” (or do anything else) because he didn’t care. Whatever he did during that time was intentional, in order that he could not be reached. So that his hands could appear to be clean afterwards.

      That’s what I think. YMMV.

      Like

      • LittleLaughter says:

        I agree with that. What I have been saying all along is that he was well aware of the suffering going on and he did not care. He was able to “go to sleep” that night without considering those men and their suffering. He was able to do that because he is evil and he has an evil agenda. Because of this, we can be sure of one thing- Obama is not above doing anything to further that agenda and protect himself.

        Like

    • Sharon says:

      What we call scandals, they call policies and procedures.

      Like

  12. dizzymissl says:

    Anyone with more than 1 brain cell knows that if 0 was anywhere that would have made him look good in relation to this debacle, we would know EVERYTHING about it.

    Like

  13. LittleLaughter says:

    When a man is able to sleep while others are suffering, when he himself holds the power to stop the suffering and to give aid, he will do anything to advance his own agenda. Obama did nothing for Americans in Bengazi. He CHOSE to do nothing. The sufferings of those people meant nothing to him. He was not bothered by it; he was not moved to take action. He went to BED. In light of this, know that he is not above doing anything to advance his own agenda.

    Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      He is having AF1! warmed up to go save the tornado victims in the AM. The Weather Channel is going to start naming them. Don’t worry he will be there soon. I wonder if the increased people living around tornado alley are why they get hit or if they always got hit but we never knew? I remember these every year all the way back to the 50’s. Back then they ad to look out for them. Now the radar can spot them. Last year a few came by and the new radar pinpointed where they were. It is like a little hurricane. They will tear up anything where they touch down. 200 wind in some of them. Obama is on the way. Do not despair.

      Like

    • LittleLaughter says:

      I might would have given Schieffer props, except that he hedged everything with “I’m not trying to be argumentative”, or “I’m not saying this is Watergate…” Please. It is a thousand times worse than Watergate, and why give Schieffer props for getting a little bit wet when he should have been doing his job all along. Make no mistake, he’s still in it for Obama. They all are. It is nice to see that the White House isn’t able to hide quite as well as before, but it’s a bit too little, too late.

      Like

  14. Billy Bowlegs says:

    Sounds like a don’t ask, don’t tell atypical policy.

    Like

  15. Pingback: Peter’s Broke and America’s Madder Than “Hell” | Grumpy Opinions

  16. Pingback: President Obama’s newest ally: John McCain | Grumpy Opinions

  17. Pingback: Finally !!!!! – Someone (Chris Wallace) Asks Where Was The President During The Benghazi attack…. | The Last Refuge | Divine Anarchy

  18. rocker124 says:

    This writer often has an insider point of view on political situations.

    http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/

    Like

  19. dizzymissl says:

    Here comes the next boom:

    PJM EXCLUSIVE: Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama

    http://networkedblogs.com/LpXEl

    this should be the END of Hilary

    Like

    • John Galt says:

      “this should be the END of Hilary”

      Should be, but it won’t. The Rose law firm billing records scandal should have prevented Hillary from ever holding public office, but it didn’t. Hillary may be spending lots of cash on media trying to get elected in 2016 while Zero won’t. Hillary also remains hot wired to Saudi money, which was the main purpose for her tenure as SOS. The Saudis no doubt appreciate Hillary’s efforts in assisting with installation of islamist Sunni Muslim controlled governments in Libya and Egypt and covering for the terrorist attack in Benghazi conducted by Saudi financed and armed Sunni Muslim terrorists. Meanwhile, Zero is biting the hand of the liberal media that got him elected and ignored Zero’s many prior scandals while attempting to throw the CIA (which very likely has a huge supply of derogatory well documented info on Zero) under the bus.

      Like

    • doodahdaze says:

      The Democrats will not care. The dupes are paid supporters and the informed are committed Proggunists who like the things she does in the name of Proggunism. She is “their’ crook.

      Like

    • The Tundra PA says:

      dizzy, does this link go where you intended it to go? Legal Insurrection’s bumper sticker of the day post?

      Like

  20. mcfyre2012 says:

    Where was Barry on the night of Benghazi? Why can’t we get a straight answer?

    Looking at his daily schedule, which normally doesn’t begin before 10:00 am and ends before six pm, Barry is known for keeping late hours (not working) and he apparently has many “Do Not Disturb” nights. Barry put Panetta in charge and disappeared. Are we really to believe Barry went to sleep for twelve hours, got up, and flew to a Vegas fundraiser? With an embassy under attack and a missing ambassador? As if,,,

    The WH is quick to dismiss, minimize, divert, and decry every question posed to them. I tend to think Barry regularly “chooms it up” on “Do Not Disturb” night, and he was spending the evening with Reggie Love. Perhaps one day soon, in a fit of arrogant shamelessness, the WH will give us a straight answer.

    Like

    • pspinach says:

      I agree Pfeiffer is not permitted to glibly dismiss Dear AWOL from responsibility. If Barry was being kept up to date throughout the night while not present in the Situation Room, he should still have been RESPONDING to the updates given, or realized his active presence was needed! The over-arching directive given to Benghazi back up and those protecting the Navy Seals in Extortion 17 was identical…………do not kill the jihadists…………..the excuse being to win hearts and minds. This is equivalent to giving comfort to jihadists while mercilessly attacking Americans, or leaving them open to murder most foul.

      Like

    • Sharon says:

      Where was Barry on the night of Benghazi? Why can’t we get a straight answer?

      Because the people asking the questions (finally) allow the deflection. When the question is not answered, they could just say, “You didn’t answer my question. Where was Barry on Benghazi Night?” And then shut up and stop talking. Even the questioners keep on talking, yappppp,yappp, yapp…ing….which helps in the intended deflection.

      Then if the questioner’s turn is over, the next questioner says, “I didn’t hear your answer to the question. Where was Barry on Benghazi Night?” If there could be about 6 days in a row of that kind of video, somehow, the dam would break.

      The questioners who are actually in a position to ask the questions direction are patsies, way too easily distracted. None of them have children apparently. Or, if they do, their children are feral because their parents are apparently incapable of even basic interrogation.

      Like

  21. doodahdaze says:

    The new poll out shows how deep the trouble we are in. A majority over 50% think Obama is covering up the truth. A majority over 50% also approve of the job Obama is doing. This spells disaster.

    Like

    • ctdar says:

      No, you need to cite your source doodahdaze, because according to Rasmussen reports of the daily tracking polls:
      Obama approval rate of likely voters is hovering @47% which includes a 40% strong disapproval in the presidents performance :
      “The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 47% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama’s job performance. Fifty-two percent (52%) now disapprove.
      Today’s figures include 26% who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 40% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14 (see trends).
      This is only the third day in the past six months that Strong Disapproval of the president has reached 40%. The other two days were May 2 and 3.”  

      http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

      Like

      • mcfyre2012 says:

        I gave up on those polls. 1,500 people don’t speak for a country of nearly 400,000,000.

        “Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. To reach those who have abandoned traditional landline telephones, Rasmussen Reports uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.”

        Translated as, “Likely voters who do not instantly hang-up and who are not on the ‘National Do-Not-Call List’ … and professional online survey-takers.”

        Like

        • ctdar says:

          Yes, understood, however Rasmussen is one of the oldest & more respected pollsters. Anyways my point to doodahdaze was don’t just throw out numbers as fact (as most informed people realize can not be accurate after the last 10 days Obama has had) without something to back up the claim.

          Like

  22. pspinach says:

    Well it’s been a rough week for me personally, as probably for most, watching the Jawbone and his handlers back to normal routine, partying and fundraising, while seeing terrible photos of Gosnell’s work (condoned indirectly by Jawbone himself). Why were there no warnings given for Okie and Texas about the tornado? There’s an undercurrent or over-current of mutual consensus at work, and it distinctly was Angelina Jolie announcing her double mastectomy publically that cut a swath through the “scandals” and diverted attention. Who the h3ll cares what her private decision is? That’s all I saw on the news for days. Then Beyonce rumors of being pregnant.

    Pray very hard for Barry and his handlers to come apart. These connections jointly working to save Dear Leader has to be disrupted while Conservatives hold together and become stronger.

    Like

  23. ed357 says:

    Typical 0bama political behavior…..

    do nothing…..

    therefor………

    be accountable for nothing……

    kinda like the Limbaugh Theorem.

    Like

    • ed357 says:

      Like the 0sama raid……

      0bama was on the golf course until…..

      the raid was successful…….

      then jump in and take credit…..

      you can bet that if he’d been there the whole time….

      0bama would have been in the center frame seatt.

      Like

  24. The only way to get the media to turn on this … leader of ours, is to see conclusive proof that the money they can make in exposing his/other bs far outweighs, in terms of profit, the negative public or financial impact of being seen as racist or ‘radical’ as fox news has been made out to be (Well, anything white and conservative).

    So the question is, how do you do that? One thing I would like to see is people turn Obama into the emperor with an empire, but no clothes. You can’t take an emperor seriously if you see him as a clown. To do that, you must show how those he surrounds himself are incredibly incompetent and make it clear that Obama is not who you are going after – rather, go after those he hand picked and chose to do their jobs. Avoid the ‘racism’ crap while showing just how useless he is – without having to make it about him. It would allow moderates to pay more attention to this and prevent the nonstop “It’s because he’s black, it’s because of this or that” and just focus on the things that matter because you will be exposing people who the country has a smaller emotional investment in.

    Let history show that he surrounded himself with slugs and he will be seen as nothing else. Fight him head on and you run the risk of him being a hero. One who ‘fights the radicals’ and inspires more people to be like him and inspires more young people to vote for them. No thanks. You won’t win this war any other way.

    Like

  25. Pingback: … Some Sense of Priorities , huh ?? … « Lake Erie Conservative

Leave a Reply to rocker124 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s