Today George Zimmerman’s legal team will head back to court to argue motions before Judge Nelson. The specifics of this motion are to request a delay in the Immunity Hearing scheduled for April 26th.
Recently O’Mara shared, through the GZ Defense website, numerous challenges from the prosecution discovery releases including blank tapes/CD’s from CCTV footage used by the State of Florida in their investigation.
Additionally, Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, is refusing to be deposed as a witness despite his prior assertions that he and his team had discovered specific evidence against George Zimmerman. There are multiple issues with the claims made by Ben Crump, and subsequently advocated by the State of Florida, regarding witness #8.
To give you yet another example of the media bias and misinformation around this case take a look at this recent article from Rene Stutzman of the Orlando Sentinel. Just in this one paragraph alone THREE glaring media contortions:
The 18-year-old woman at the center of dispute was interviewed by Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda April 2 in Jacksonville and gave him the same general account as she told Crump. (link)
….”The 18-year-old woman“…..? Rene Stutzman disengenuously never reconciles how she now comes to the position of Witness #8 being eighteen when all of her prior articles listed witness #8 as sixteen and a minor.
…. “interviewed by Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda April 2 in Jacksonville“… ? Um, not even close. The April 2nd interview with witness #8 was at the home of Sybrina Fulton in North-Miami.
…”and gave him the same general account as she told Crump“….? How does Rene Stutzman reconcile this statement? Does she have some insider information that even the defense is not aware of?