Benghazi Slaughter – Hillary Exposed, Publicly Linked Benghazi To Mohammed U-Tube Film Prior To Navy SEALs Woods And Doherty Killed…

The timelines between actual events, public statements by officials, and the contrasted contradictions, are what has historically exposed deception in almost every case.   The Benghazi coverup is no different.   Essentially Hillary Clinton gave a public statement to the press reporting Sean Smith’s death – while Woods and Doherty were still fighting;  And Hillary assigned impetus toward the U-Tube video at the same time. 

blood on their hands

WASHINGTON DC – On the night of Sept. 11, 2012 — before former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed by a terrorist mortar strike — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released a public statement linking the attack against the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, with an anti-Muslim video, which she referred to as “inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

Clinton’s statement, still posted on State’s website, is dated Sept. 11, 2012, and headlined: “Statement on the Attack in Benghazi.” […]


However, the Associated Press first published a story quoting Clinton’s statement at 10:58 p.m. Eastern time on Sept. 11.

The AP released a story that night datelined Cairo, written by Maggie Michael and Sarah El Deeb, and carrying the headline, “American killed in Libya protest over film.” The story noted that Clinton had confirmed that “one State Department officer had been killed in the protest at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.” It also quoted directly from Clinton’s statement: “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

The Associated Press’ Media Relations office confirmed to me that the AP first published its version of this story quoting Clinton’s statement at 10:58 p.m. Eastern time on Sept. 11.

A CIA timeline of the Benghazi events provided by a senior U.S. intelligence official, the Senate Homeland Security Committee’s report on Benghazi and the State Department’s own Accountability Review Board Report all indicate that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed at the U.S. “Annex” in Benghazi sometime between about 5:14 a.m. and 5:26 a.m. Benghazi time on Sept. 12. That would be between 11:14 p.m. and 11:26 p.m. on Sept. 11 in Washington, D.C. — or at least 16 minutes after the AP reported Clinton’s statement.  (read more)


What I take away from this sniglet of information is that the State Dept. was mistakenly attaching motivation from Cairo, Egypt on to Benghazi, Libya.   We know that even earlier in the day on 9-11-12 the State Dept was questioned about Cairo and was assigning motive to the U-Tube video they only recently became aware of.

cairo tweet

cairo 3 - mob of islamists at embassy

Cairo 1 - State Dept Statement

Hillary and the inept corruptocrats in the White House used State Dept information, which was seriously flawed, to attach the motive to Benghazi.   Why?  Because they freaked, and rushed – Remember this was a joint CIA/State Dept operation.  [too many cooks in the kitchen when the health inspector shows up and wants to know about the soup – immediately]

Once that motive was established, the State Dept rushed to give it to the media.  The White House, well the Oval Office specifically, never questioned enough and sold it, continued to sell it, and framed their entire narration around it, even when they knew it to be wrong.

White House 9-11-12 Donilon - McDonough

See:   Denis McDonough who became the deflective pitchman.

This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Election 2012, Islam, media bias, Obama re-election, Sept 11, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Benghazi Slaughter – Hillary Exposed, Publicly Linked Benghazi To Mohammed U-Tube Film Prior To Navy SEALs Woods And Doherty Killed…

  1. Sharon says:

    Since her statement mentions massive tolerance of others’ religion and efforts to avoid religiously offending others (lest those offended kill the people who offended them), perhaps, as law-abiding, taxpaying American citizens, Mr. and Mrs. Hobby Lobby are going about their own efforts to survive all wrong.

    From this example, it would appear they’re making a mistake in framing the situation as being about their Constitutional rights as individuals. They need to focus on being offended….because if you’re really offended, you can get by with anything….

    Just a thought.


  2. tessa50 says:

    I have looked at this photo over and over and to me it seems that mcdounough and the man on the very far right are the only ones actually there. Sorry I cannot think of his name. Does it seem that way to any of you? Sure looks to me like mcdounough was addressing him and him only.


    • Sharon says:

      so could biden be shopped in as well? Could be. He looks weird. Isn’t it a fine pass we’ve come to with regard to trusting the powerful people. They’ve earned it.

      And when we may be accused of over-reacting, I just have one simple question: Why has that happened? We didn’t arrive in a vacuum from a vacuum. And I guarantee you, I’ve never seen the like of the suspicion, the distrust, much evidence to support the distrust in all the years of Nixon, Kennedy, LBJ, Carter, Reagan, Bush 1–not even during Clinton was there the sense that he was lying ALL THE TIME, engineering EVERYTHING. We knew full well what Clinton was capable of–but it was not like this.

      Nixon at his worst: not like this. LBJ at his most cussing, crude worst: not like this. Carter in all his incompetence and foolishness: nothing like this.


  3. Arkindole says:

    And these timelines, and chats of Sean, make it even more confusing in terms of what was going on at the main compound…

    “Could it be because they were helping those who were later coming to attack the compound in a planned attack by showing them the layout of buildings? Could this seemingly simple game chat from Vile Rat with his game buddy contain a clue of a planned attack.

    Are those Libyan guards being interrogated and are any of them under arrest?

    Of course, they could have been taking pictures like tourists or trying out their new Instagram apps. But it’s more likely they were taking them for a purpose — a purpose that stood out for Sean and made him comment — and it was part of the uneasy signals from his environment that made Sean Smith say “assuming we don’t die tonight.”

    The way the news stories went, it seemed as if he typed that line in chat, then typed “FUCK GUNFIRE” in the next line and was never heard from again.

    I got the idea that all these chat lines came later at night, right before the attack — at 9:30 pm or 10:00 pm. But the game chat is time-stamped 12:54:09 PM. Is that the time-stamp of a game player located in the US? Or Iceland? Tripoli is two hours ahead of Reykjavik, the capital of Iceland, where EVE online’s company is located. Games are often set to the time of their physical developers’ locations. That means when it is 12:54 pm in Reykjavik, it is 2:54 pm in Tripoli, or about 7 hours before the 10 pm attack. Game time could be irrelevant here, however, if the two men were only chatting on Jabber, a chat program for game fans to use outside the game itself.”


  4. JAS says:

    This is the best explanation I have come across to this mess, written by Matt Bracken: Every agency was ready to respond to the attack as they are all trained to do, but the only person that could give the CBA “Cross Border Authority” did not, so they didn’t. That person is the POTUS:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s