First “Birthers” Now “Transcripters”…..

In the effort to protect President Obama from closer inspection, the media who refused to vett Candidate Obama in 2007/2008, are now once again returning to their Alinsky meme/strategy of ridicule toward anyone who requests to see Candidate President Obama’s school records or qualifications for ultimate control of the economy.

While I do not hold high opinion of Donald Trump for a variety of reasons, I will at least give him some merit for not backing down from their attempts at ridiculing what is, in actuality, a very credible question.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

80 Responses to First “Birthers” Now “Transcripters”…..

  1. kinthenorthwest says:

    Now I know why I stopped watching CNN

    Like

  2. mwsomerset says:

    Seriously….you are a birther? I’m surprised to see that and here I was thinking this was a reasonable site that formed opinions based on logic and facts…oh well.. All I have to say is…if President Obama was successful in pulling off the biggest scam in the history of our nation then that is one smart, clever man and I most definitely want him for my president 4 more years.

    Like

    • garnette says:

      The fact it was signed by U K Le Lee and has a smiley face on it, kind of makes me wonder how legit it is. Is he really one smart, clever man or do people really not pay attention to details anymore? I wouldn’t call me a birther, just someone who sees things others tend to overlook.

      Like

    • Aussie says:

      you have to be joking.

      Even if that man was born in Hawaii he is not eligible to be President because his father was not an American citizen.

      He is not in the slightest bit smart… is extremely dumb… and his drug habit is a darned good reason not to have such a creepy person in the White House.

      Like

    • ZurichMike says:

      Seiously . . . you think Barack Hussein Sotero Obama is a US citizen? I’m surprised to see your slavish devotion to anything-goes-and-the-hell-with-the-Constitution and unreasonable opinion based on illogic and lack of facts . . . oh well. All I have to say is, if Obama was successful in pulling off the biggest scam in the history of our nation, and you want to be president again as a a reward for his perpetration of a public fraud and destruction of our nation’s constitutional and legal underpinnings, then you are as depraved, vapid, and gutless as the calloused-knee sycophants in the media and the Democratic Party that applaud the every utterance of the Marxist affirmative action, white-guilt man-boy inhabitant of the White House.

      Like

    • Tula says:

      Birther? You want logic and facts mwsomerset? OK

      ***Fact 1***
      “A dictator in the White House”
      by Olavo de Carvalho – November 20, 2008

      “… The refusal to show documents, by contrast, is a fact, the most established fact in this whole incident. Actually, it is more than a refusal: it is premeditated engineering of concealment, which was done simultaneously in the United States and in Kenya, in order to block all access not only to the birth certificate, but to almost all of the President elect’s documents, without which nothing his propaganda may assert about him can be trusted, except through an act of irrational faith…” – Olavo de Carvalho
      http://www.olavodecarvalho.org/english/articles/081120jb_en.html

      ***Fact 2***
      Constitution of the United States

      Article II

      Section. 2.
      The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States…
      http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

      ***Fact 3***
      Verification of Citizenship
      You must demonstrate citizenship eligibility for enlistment by providing recruiters official citizenship documents. Your Recruiter must sight the original citizenship verification documents which will be photocopied, and certified as copies of the original document. The certified copies will be placed in your service record and MEPS residual file. Your original documents should be immediately returned to you.
      http://www.navycs.com/blogs/2011/02/02/navy-citizenship-requirements

      Who was responsible for vetting candidates back in 2008?

      If the presidential candidate was applying for the position of “Commander in Chief,” of the Armed Forces of the United States, then reason would have me believe that it was the Military’s responsibility, the sitting “Commander in Chief ,” to see that all candidates met those requirements.

      Like

    • tnwahm says:

      Seriously? You would support and applaud someone that is a known liar and con artist?

      Oh, wait. You are a liberal. You support a whole slew of them.

      Like

  3. griz1234 says:

    This reinforces my negative opinion of George Will. He’s a typical dilettante RINO, who is makes conservative noises but can be depended upon to be on the wrong side of major issues.

    I’ve not really been following the whole birth certificate issue, because it’s far too late to matter. If someone’s determined that the original short form AND the long form birth certificate were both cut-and-paste photoshopped forgeries, then I’d like to see the proof.

    What I find most disturbing is that so much effort was spend to delay and block the release of a simple document. It not only makes you wonder what’s being concealed, but it makes you consider that whatever it is, it’s worse than the damage caused by the foot-dragging games.

    Perhaps it’s all a exercise to keep folk’s attention focused on a non-issue, rather than on stuff like gun walking and Obama’s inability to come through on most of his campaign promises. I just can’t believe that Obama’s pack of idiots could be responsible for such a subtle plan.

    Like

    • mwsomerset says:

      President Obama released a copy of his live birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii during his campaign for President…but that just wasn’t good enough for the conspiracy theorists…nothing ever is….that’s why you ignore them which is what he did…until it became such a huge distraction….so he releases the long form and it still isn’t good enough. As far as his campaign promises go…he only has a few left that he has not met….most are completed or in the works. The people that voted for President Obama recognize why some of his promises are not met…for example…closing Gitmo…Congress would not allocate monies to house the prisoners who needed to stay imprisoned.

      Like

      • Sharon says:

        Oh. Ok. Unbelievable……………….

        Like

      • Aussie says:

        No. So far we have not seen a legitimate birth certificate. The last one was a photoshoped forgery.

        Like

      • Isn’t it a little late for you to be up working Mr. Axelrod?

        Like

      • Forget the labels for a moment, if that is possible. Again, the Truth has no agenda. If you need to attach labels in order to qualify your position, go right ahead; that still does not diminish the factual inconsistencies amid people regarding factfinding.

        Let us not soon forget the Main Stream media which employed the services of over 200 people to pour over 36,000 individual e-mails of Governor Palin, for what purpose? Nor the main stream media embedding a NYT reporter for a week in the Mormon church seeking “discovery” on Mitt Romney. And lest we soon forget the 5,000+ man hours invested in Media research which ultimately led to Dan Rather “fabricating” documentation on George W. Bush.

        You see, there is an agenda, a specific and purposeful agenda, behind selective engagement in the search for truth from progressives. The same progressives who would ridicule anyone for seeking honest answers to blatent questions about the qualification for a President who has amplified the economic contraction currently being experienced.

        A painted rock at the entry to a hunting lease for Governor Perry deserves endless investigation, but The Democrat Party of Hawaii specifically informing the Democrat National Committee of its inability to certify a candidate’s eligibility is ignored.

        Truth has no agenda. And President Obama should be vetted in the same vigor as the aforementioned politicians on the opposing side of the political spectrum. Indeed if there is nothing to hide then why avoid the sunlight.

        But then again, the “Truth” has no agenda, all other interests do.

        Like

      • ZurichMike says:

        Where to begin with the troll comments?

        1. Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is known fraud of photoshopped elements. The media, already in the bag for The One, does not conduct any investigative journalism.

        2. Keeping one’s promises is a non-starter if the promises ruin the country. Let’s look at his record: record high unemployment, record high home foreclosures, record currency devaluation, record new debt, record fraud (Solyndra, Fast and Furious, New Black Panthers) record for not having a budget, record number of foreign policy failures (Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan), record humiliation for the US (bowing to Saudi princes, verbally smacked by Russia, France, and Germany). His military successes were based on a continuation of the Bush doctrine and policies (killing OBL, for example), continuing GITMO

        3. The Democrats controlled Congress and the White House for two years — if he wanted to close Gitmo, he could have — and just printed more money for it just like he did for ObamaCare.

        Go back to your puppet-masters at Salon, CNN, or MSNBC.

        Like

  4. fedup says:

    Maybe the whole thing is to keep people’s attention from “natural” born to “native” born. They’re both mentioned in the Constitution.

    Like

    • garnette says:

      Besides, he has said that his father was a British subject so he had dual citizenship and he still got elected, so what can we do about it. There are other issues that we all should focus on in this election rather than let this be a distraction.

      Like

      • Aussie says:

        It goes beyond dual citizenship. No one has been willing to look into the fact that when he was adopted by Lolo Soetero he became an Indonesian citizen. It is highly likely that he is an illegal alien!!!

        Like

    • Patriot Dreamer says:

      “Native born” is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

      Like

  5. Sentenza says:

    In one of his bios on some writings of his, didn’t he claim to be Kenyan born?

    Like

    • mwsomerset says:

      No

      Like

      • Sandusky says:

        Well, actually, yes. From 1991 to 2007. See screen shots at http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Obama-pamphlet-in-use-2007. Also http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/A-Fact-Checking-Error-Repeated-Multiple-Times-Over-Several-Years-by-Different-Agencies. Oh yeah, and http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/18/dystel-biography-submission-guidelines-obama-kenya-fact-checking-error

        Which does appear to indicate that either (a) he really was born in Kenya but it wasn’t important for him to hide the fact until he decided to run for president or (b) he wasn’t born in Kenya but (again until he decided to run for president) he didn’t want that fact to be known for some reason – perhaps, for example, he had been claiming Kenya as his place of birth in order to obtain preferential treatment in regard to educational opportunities (but we can’t imagine any politician doing that, now can we, Ms.Warren?). Item (b) would also nicely explain why he would feel it necessary to have ALL his scholastic records hermetically sealed.

        Option (c) is that it was just a silly little fact-checking error that some assistant didn’t notice at the time or indeed during its subsequent revisions but now clearly remembers having made 16 years ago (oh, come on now, haven’t you ever written Kenya when you meant to write Hawaii? could happen to anyone), and that even Obama himself missed originally and during subsequent revisions when the bio was sent to him for approval (since even during those earlier years he was so exceptional that he didn’t have to do any of his own work like, say, writing his own bio, even tho this was standard practice for other authors at this agency).

        But if you have other theories, mwsomerset (and somehow, I feel sure that you have), please feel free to post ’em.

        Like

        • Sandusky says:

          Sorry, I should clarify that the original “error” wasn’t made 16 years ago – it remained “uncorrected” for 16 years, i.e., from 1991 to 2007. It was actually *made* 20 years ago (or 21, depending on when in 1991 the bio was published). How fortunate that Ms. Goderich has such excellent long-term memory.

          Like

        • kinthenorthwest says:

          to non-birthers or ??? they are just forgeries…
          Sorry too many forgeries..

          Like

    • lovemygirl says:

      There was a bio that did say that but the editor gives her explanation as follows:
      The text editor of the 1991 literary agency booklet that described Barack Obama as “born in Kenya” said Thursday the line in question was “nothing more than a fact checking error.”

      Miriam Goderich issued a statement to the Political Wire saying the future president never suggested “in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii”:

      “You’re undoubtedly aware of the brouhaha stirred up by Breitbart about the erroneous statement in a client list Acton & Dystel published in 1991 (for circulation within the publishing industry only) that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time. There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more.”

      Like

      • garnette says:

        Wow a fact checking error that is not discovered until about 20 years later. I guess it was written and never changed or fact checked in all that time.

        Like

      • GAinNY says:

        I worked in book and magazine publishing. There is no fact-checking of author bios, which are submitted by the authors.

        Like

        • Sandusky says:

          Yes, and that’s true at the company in question as well – see my third link above re biography submission guidelines at Dystel.

          Like

        • Agreed. In academics, it’s the same way. Author bios are always submitted by the authors. Who else could write them anyway? It’s interesting how many people are willing to blatantly and outrageously lie to cover for poor Barack, who doesn’t even know, himself, where he was born.

          Like

        • Artist says:

          Right you are, I work in book and magazine publishing, as well, and have had several different agents over the years and have ALWAYS written my own bios.
          Half truths, stretched truths, grains of truth…outright lies…these mythomaniacs are so hard to pin down……slippery as eels.

          Like

          • Well, the best lies are the ones we tell ourselves, right? And that’s what goes in our Bios! BTW, I love your work, W. E. If we can scrape up enough cash from our cuss jar, we should hire you to do our website banner. How are you with wolverines? 😉

            Like

            • Artist says:

              Shucks, GoMC, thank you. I was asked earlier today about hedgehogs….I told them well, a few…but I’ve painted dogs, cats, chickens, ducks, roosters, badgers, mice, cows, pigs, bears, squirrels, bunnies, beavers, foxes, elephants, tigers, moose, rhinos, raccoons, alligators, frogs, weasels, wolves, horses…. so wolverines, cool,…yeah, I could probably do that. Let’s talk. : )

              Like

              • If you get a chance, can you give me a link to a badger painting in your galleries? If it works as a wolvo-honey-badger, which are all kinda related, right?, I’ll send you some cashola if you let us use it!

                Like

      • kinthenorthwest says:

        there is someplace where it was shown how it was updated two or three times…
        So the story of it being an error of fact checking doesnt jive, especially when you add in all the other videos from him and his wife and other family members.

        Like

    • Aussie says:

      Yes. That is true. It was an early bio, and it has been proved that the bio stated he was Kenyan born. They claim now that it was an error… but there was no correction since the 1990s until 2012!!

      Like

  6. Artist says:

    I really resent the whole tinfoil hat “birther” moniker to start with. No one else, not a single other living politician has come up with a goofy bupkis COLB to dazzle his hypnotized minions with, and then when that started getting really old and stupid, out comes a multi-fonted, many layered, digital only piece of nonsense that anyone with a few hours of PhotoShop study can rip apart as phoney baloney in a matter of minutes. Now that we have discovered ( according to Breitbart ) that Obama himself was the original “birther” trying to make his Oreo, Hawaii, prep school self cool in the Black, community activist world…voila, he was born in Kenya, but then, oopsie….not so cool when you decide it would be cooler to be POTUS than said Community activist…presto change-o, that was the dummy agent’s mistake….that no one caught for 17 years.
    BUT….that’s all totally normal….every other American needs verifiable ID for every single facet of American life, social security card ( oops! they say Obama’s is phoney), passports ( oops, how DID he go to Pakistan when Americans couldn’t go?) selective service registration ( oops, wasn’t his fraudulent and now has disappeared!!) somehow he owns a house….but it’s oddly in the name of a trust…and now those pesky people want to see his college transcripts for heaven’s sake!!! Why, why , why???? I mean isn’t it obvious that Obama , a Law Professor ( hahahahahaha-NOT! ) is brilliant. I mean, so what that that awful Mitt Romney guy was awarded a joint Juris Doctor and Master of Business Administration from Harvard and there’s easy peasy proof..if you don’t simply KNOW that Obama is way cooler then you’re obviously a racist or a…a…a… transcripter!!!!!!!!
    This is insane…the scrawny, nasty, bony emperor is butt nekkid and it ain’t pretty!

    Like

    • tnwahm says:

      I’m sure yours is a rhetorical question; however, I’ll answer it. The only way DemonRats can “win” elections is thru fraud, ~dead voters, illegal entrants, stuffing the ballot box~ lying and activists judges.

      Like

  7. howie says:

    I think Obama is a Spook. There is no way anyone could hide all the information on their own. The GOP will not touch this stuff with a 10 foot pole.The Hawaii records are amended and “updated.”

    Like

  8. Aoife says:

    Saw this awesome commercial today…hits hard at what electing someone based on their celebrity really means. http://www.americancrossroads.org/2012/04/latest-video-cool/

    Like

  9. Patriot Dreamer says:

    Literary agencies don’t “fact check” author bios. They take the information that is given to them from the authors. In this particular case, the bio. was out there for 16+ years and at least 3 revisions without Obama correcting the birthplace until AFTER he declared his candidacy for POTUS in 2007. That timing sure is convenient.

    So, either Obama lied about being born in Kenya or he lied about being born in Hawaii. Both statements cannot be true. So, Obama is a liar.

    The question is, who has he defrauded with these lies? If he lied about being born in Hawaii when he was really born in Kenya, then he has defrauded the entire country. Did he lie about his place of birth when he applied to schools or for college loans/scholarships to get affirmative action/diversity placement? If so, then he defrauded them and the country should know this information before making the decision about whether he should be re-elected or not.

    Like

  10. Tula says:

    “Obama Doesn’t Know His Own Birth Date”
    Uploaded – July 17, 2011

    “Obama on MYSPACE: I’m Now 4 Years Younger!”
    by Joe Kovacs – August 4, 2010
    http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187933/

    Like

  11. Burnt Toast says:

    Birtherism is a red-herring.

    The problem is so simple it is laughable –

    The Founders were well aware of the issue of divided loyalties, somehow magically convey by birth, that in one of the few if only tests specified in the Constitution they prohibited those of foreign citizenship by birth to be President unless they were born before a certain date… most of the Founders were of British birthright and could have simply stated in the Constitution that upon ratification all citizens of the States as of ratification were citizens. (<= note thy period)

    BUT, they went further and instituted a grandfather clause that was only applicable to those of their generation who were, for example, born British subjects, and were eligible for POTUS.

    How ironic that a British subject by birth became POTUS some two-hundred years later and all anyone can point to is the 14th Amendment (which did not specifically contravene the "Natural Born" clause, even if it did would nullify by sovereign decree the whole concept of 'natural' which the Founders were rather much about) when the relevant clause (by decree, not natural law) was the 19th.

    Like

    • Tula says:

      Correct Burnt Toast.

      Publius Huldah
      Ask Questions – Scroll Down to Question # 15. – Scroll Down – February 19, 2012

      11 “…. I really enjoy your blog and I am learning a lot about our Constitution. I have a question concerning the qualifications of being president. Since president Obama’s father was a British…

      Yes, obama’s putative father, Barrack H. Obama, Sr., was a subject of the British Crown when obama was born. That means that obama is not a “natural born citizen” within the meaning of Art. II, Sec. 1, cl. 5.
      So obama is constitutionally INELIGIBLE to be President. It doesn’t matter where he was born. All that business about his being born in Hawaii is simply a red herring designed to mislead the more gullible of Our People.
      The Constitution and the Federalist Papers do not define “natural born citizen”. That tells me that at the time, “everyone” knew what it meant. I am convinced that our Framers had in mind Vattel’s definition of “natural born citizen”. Vattel was a recognized authority on the Laws of Nations, and our Framers frequently quoted him as an authority in their various writings. So we KNOW that Our Framers were familiar with Vattel’s work. Read Vattel’s 3 paras where he defines “natural born citizen”:
      Vattel, “The Law of Nations”, Book I, Ch. XIX,
      http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/ask-questions/comment-page-1/#comments

      A. Eligibility
      Perhaps the first and foremost element of a constitutional Presidency is eligibility. Article II, section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution states:

      No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a Resident within the United States.2
      http://www.lonang.com/conlaw/3/c35a.htm#2a

      John Jay’s Letter to George Washington – “Natural Born Citizen”

      Natural Born Citizenship – Dr. Herb Titus
      Part 1

      Part 2

      A Question of Eligibility – Attorney Dr. Herb Titus

      The Roth Show – Archives
      Laurie Roth interviewed by telephone from Hawaii
      Mike Zullo, Lead Investigator of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse & Jerome Corsi
      Podcast – Friday – May 25, 2012 – Hour 1
      http://therothshow.com/show-archives/may-2012/

      Direct mp3 link – May 25, 2012 – HR1
      [audio src="http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1May2512.mp3" /]

      Like

  12. Then there’s the questions about why all references to Minor v Happerset were removed from Justia.com during Obama’s campaign…

    For those not in the know, Justia is about the only reliable database of ScOTUS Decisions We The People can access without exorbitant fees…

    During the run-up to the ’08 campaign, all references to the only case where the court’s ruled on the meaning of “natural born citizen” were removed from the site!

    Why? Because Dear Reader doesn’t qualify under the definition the court adopted!

    See http://www.examiner.com/article/justiagate or http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/ or just use your favorite non-google (fark them!) search-engine to find “justiagate” and pick something you like from the list!

    Like

    • Sharon says:

      Justia is was about the only reliable database of ScOTUS Decisions We The People can access without exorbitant fees…

      Like

    • howie says:

      There can only be one answer to the question you pose. Obama is not a natural born citizen as defined by the case. There could be no other reason for a person to deliberately and specifically remove the references to the SCOTUS opinion. Obama may be a citizen, but not a natural born one.
      That settled, the question becomes, what to do about it?
      Here we have a person who was legally elected, but was not eligible to be the President as defined in the Constitution. It is obvious that many people are involved in a conspiracy since before the election to hide the facts about the candidates citizenship and other personal history. Records have been altered and manufactured. No wonder this is Taboo as a topic.
      This probably can only be remedied by the upcoming election. Once he is defeated and out of office an investigation and prosecution can begin, if the new administration is so inclined.

      Like

      • Nothing will happen.

        Nothing.

        This is why I’ve argued against wasting time on it since January of ’09!

        Prior to the election, those not under the total control of the REAL “TPTB” didn’t dare address this issue for the same reason Jorge Zimmerman is being railroaded: they knew this would seriously tick off The Diversity and rioting in cities nationwide would be the result.

        Things are INFINITELY more complicated now… Just *TRY* to imagine if O’jughead were to be declared ineligible now… this would mean that everything he did as _resident was illegitimate, and thus null and void!

        Every law he signed? Revoked. Every treaty? Nullified. Every MILITARY order? Legally, it was never given — just think of the ramifications of this alone!

        Bottom line: *IF* our Republic survives the coming RObamaney term, we must learn from this and never make the same mistake again!

        Like

        • howie says:

          The legal nightmare is unfathomable. I have no idea what to do about it. A Federal Grand Jury might be able to get to the bottom of this if appointed. It would not be a bad thing if everything he has done was undone. To me, it is beyond a reasonable doubt that he is not NBC, and he knew it. So did many many others.

          Like

  13. Ignatius J Donnelly says:

    You people realize that the reason Obama and the Democrats were so coy about his Birthplace and Birth certificate was that they enjoyed seeing birthers make fools out of themselves.
    The GOP has been hijacked by the lunatic fringe and people know it. It helped Obama win in 2008.

    Like

    • howie says:

      They may not enjoy it so much in January. The fringe you speak of are actually aware citizens. The people spoke in 2010. The far left immediately stuck their heads in the sand. They will speak again in November and next week in Wisconsin. This may not be the Perfect Crime you think it is. We will see.

      Like

    • “…The GOP has been hijacked by the lunatic fringe and people know it…”

      Wow – this fool really has gone all-in on the knee-pads…

      Clearly not just a suCker, but a swallower as well, huh? (rolleyes)

      Here again is a striking example of the projection that The Enemy is constantly engaged in foisting off as “reality”…

      The Demmunist party has basically gone all-in on their big-government socio-communism, no longer even bothering to pretend to be anything else, so that only the most clueless “useful idiots” and the most dedicated “true believers” can say otherwise with a straight face – the former out of ignorance, and the latter of malice and dishonesty.

      Meanwhile, the Republitard party *HAS* been taken over by “extremists” — the same big-government Socio-communist extremists (aka “progressives”) that have taken over the other branch of “The Government Party.”

      Yet these traitors and/or fools wish to pretend that those of us who want nothing more than for our .gov to honor the contract that created it (the Constitution) – and either live within the boundaries of said contract or follow the proper, clearly defined procedures specified to amend it, are the “Extremists.”

      Just think about that for a moment, folks!

      We’ve gone so far down the road to hell that expecting the .gov to honor the constitution and their solemn oath is considered EXTREMISM!

      As Mike Church pointed out on HIS show this morning, Obama’s claim that using missiles fired by drones to commit the deliberate murder of American Citizens in a foreign, allied nation is just accepted at this point – even though their claim is that a secret meeting between him and his lawyers qualifies as “due process”…

      Since he’s now declared (via “NDAA”) that US TERRITORY is just another “battleground” in this “war on terror”, it’s just a matter of time until he starts doing the same thing to people RIGHT HERE AT HOME!!

      Does anyone SERIOUSLY believe that Mitt-for-brains Robamaney is going to give up this power if he wins in November?

      WHAT F*****G COUNTRY ***IS*** THIS??!!!

      God help us — and GOD SAVE OUR REPUBLIC!!

      Like

      • howie says:

        Well it may not be that bad. More people are taking notice now that the effects are hitting. November will tell if we head back to the Dark Ages or put a stop to the nonsense. We will pay a price individually no matter what, for neglecting our responsibility collectively. I figure the man upstairs will keep an eye out for us.

        Like

      • howie says:

        You might be interested to know that Larry Klayman may have finally hit the Jackpot. He has a hearing on the 18th in Leon County Florida. He is suing to keep Obama off the ballot and citing Minor v Happerset (1875). The thing Obama fears most. It is Binding Authority. Obama may not be able to get on the Florida Ballot. Yahoo!

        Like

        • ytz4mee says:

          I absolutely refuse to get my hopes up.

          Like

          • Patriot Dreamer says:

            Me too. It’s sad, but we are a country of men – not of laws. 😦

            Like

          • howie says:

            Well this case is in Circuit Court for one thing. The Minor case is binding on the judge. He has no choice but to go with it. It is Primary. A SCOTUS ruling. It is the only SCOTUS ruling on the NBC issue. It says basically that a natural born citizen is one whose both parents are citizens.

            Obama has only one parent who was a citizen. It is clear. The Constitution requires the President to be Natural Born and over 35 years old. So just as a 30 year old Obama could not qualify neither can an Obama with only one citizen parent. The Constitution does not define a NBC but this case does. A native, or natural born citizen as distinguished from aliens or foreigners who become citizens. It is two paragraphs out of a longer opinion. There has never been a case like this one. There have only been 42 Presidents and thus only 42 people who have had to “qualify” for the office. All 41 before Obama were Natural Born. Meaning both of their parents were citizens. Obama has only one citizen parent. He does not qualify.

            The case Primary legal authority and the court must follow it.

            Like

    • barnslayer says:

      Yes, oblamer has a time machine. He knew in advance how the GOP would react to his lack of papers. He truly is a genius. Have some Kool-aid.

      Like

    • Patriot Dreamer says:

      You realize that Obama was the very first “birther”, don’t you? The agent speaks for the principal, and the agent claimed that he was born in Kenya. Therefore, Obama claimed that he was born in Kenya and did not bother to correct it to Hawaii until after he declared his candidacy for President. Why? So was he lying then or is he lying now? Either way, he’s a liar.

      Like

    • Sandusky says:

      So you’re saying that he does have a valid birth certificate but he didn’t want to show it because he was having too much fun playing mind games with some of the people he was elected to lead and serve?

      And that strikes you as an appropriate attitude because…? Presumably you believe that it illustrates some desirable quality in a president, but I must admit that I’m not seeing it. It strikes me that such behaviour would be a sign of massive egotism and a conviction of his own superiority over the rest of the human race; a sign of a man who despises and enjoys punishing anyone who didn’t vote for him; and a sign of someone who enjoys fostering strife and dissension instead of understanding and healing. Maybe it’s just me, but none of those strike me as terribly admirable traits, especially in someone who holds a position of great power.

      No doubt he listed himself as Kenyan-born in the bio he gave to his first publisher, and changed it to Hawaiian-born some 17 years later, because he thought it would be hilarious when someone eventually stumbled on this discrepancy and thought that it was proof he was a liar instead of realizing that it was just his knee-slapping sense of humour, right?

      Well, sure, why not? It’s not as if he had anything more important to do, with the country in such fine shape and all…

      Like

    • Aussie says:

      ahem…. you do not seem to be aware that the original “birthers” are Democrats. It is true. The first cases were made by Democrat operatives. The Clintons were amongst the first of the birthers.

      Other than that, you have no understanding of the subject. Yes it is true that there are people who insist that the fraud in the White House was born elsewhere. However, that does not matter because he claims as his father a Kenyan. That means he is at the very least a dual citizen and is therefore not eligible to be POTUS…. end of story.

      Like

    • Aussie says:

      BTW no one has seen a valid birth certificate. That thing that was shown last year is a forgery and not a very good one at that!!

      Like

      • howie says:

        Funny. Obama will have to claim the BC is a fake in order to defend himself in the Florida Court. Discovery is on the 18th. This oughta be good. If he is tossed on the Florida Ballot that is 29 EC votes.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s