Left Wing Moonbat Hanoi Jane Fonda Claims Her QVC Appearance Was Canceled Over Protest Fears…

(TMZ) — Jane Fonda’s controversy in Vietnam is almost 40 years old yet she claims QVC canceled her appearance at the last-minute because of fears of protests from disgruntled viewers.  Jane was supposed to appear this morning to promote her new book, “Prime Time.” But Fonda posted a blog on her site this morning claiming QVC gave her the boot because “they got a lot of calls yesterday criticizing me for my opposition to the Vietnam War and threatening to boycott the show if I was allowed to appear.”

In her blog, Fonda went on to say:

“Bottom line, this has gone on far too long, this spreading of lies about me! None of it is true. NONE OF IT! I love my country. I have never done anything to hurt my country or the men and women who have fought and continue to fight for us.”

Really Jane, really?   Perhaps you think that enough time has passed, or maybe you think that people should just get over it, or maybe you are trying to re-write the insufferable truth of your treason.    Well let me set the record straight.  Hanoi Jane Fonda is a treasonous Left-Wing Bitch and I will not stand by while history is re-written.   Not on my watch.

You really wanna go there Jane you insufferable witch?  OK, your call.  Read on.

Firstly Here is the Transcript in full of Hanoi Jane’s broadcast speech.   The following  was submitted in the U.S. Congress House Committee on Internal Security, Travel to Hostile Areas. [HR16742, 19-25 September 1972, page 761]


This is Jane Fonda. During my two-week visit in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, I’ve had the opportunity to visit a great many places and speak to a large number of people from all walks of life- workers, peasants, students, artists and dancers, historians, journalists, film actresses, soldiers, militia girls, members of the women’s union, writers.

I visited the (Dam Xuac) agricultural coop, where the silk worms are also raised and thread is made. I visited a textile factory, a kindergarten in Hanoi. The beautiful Temple of Literature was where I saw traditional dances and heard songs of resistance. I also saw unforgettable ballet about the guerrillas training bees in the south to attack enemy soldiers. The bees were danced by women, and they did their job well.

In the shadow of the Temple of Literature I saw Vietnamese actors and actresses perform the second act of Arthur Miller’s play All My Sons, and this was very moving to me- the fact that artists here are translating and performing American plays while US imperialists are bombing their country.

I cherish the memory of the blushing militia girls on  the roof of their factory, encouraging one of their sisters as she sang a song praising the blue sky of Vietnam- these women, who are so gentle and poetic, whose voices are so beautiful, but who, when American planes are bombing their city, become such good fighters.

I cherish the way a farmer evacuated from Hanoi, without hesitation, offered me, an American, their best individual bomb shelter while US bombs fell near by. The daughter and I, in fact, shared the shelter wrapped in each others arms, cheek against cheek. It was on the road back from Nam Dinh, where I had witnessed the systematic destruction of civilian targets- schools, hospitals, pagodas, the factories, houses, and the dike system.

As I left the United States two weeks ago, Nixon was again telling the American people that he was winding down the war, but in the rubble- strewn streets of Nam Dinh, his words echoed with sinister (words indistinct) of a true killer. And like the young Vietnamese woman I held in my arms clinging to me tightly- and I pressed my cheek against hers- I thought, this is a war against Vietnam perhaps, but the tragedy is America’s.

One thing that I have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt since I’ve been in this country is that Nixon will never be able to break the spirit of these people; he’ll never be able to turn Vietnam, north and south, into a neo- colony of the United States by bombing, by invading, by attacking in any way. One has only to go into the countryside and listen to the peasants describe the lives they led before the revolution to understand why every bomb that is dropped only strengthens their determination to resist. I’ve spoken to many peasants who talked about the days when their parents had to sell themselves to landlords as virtually slaves, when there were very few schools and much illiteracy, inadequate medical care, when they were not masters of their own lives.

But now, despite the bombs, despite the crimes being created- being committed against them by Richard Nixon, these people own their own land, build their own schools- the children learning, literacy- illiteracy is being wiped out, there is no more prostitution as there was during the time when this was a French colony. In other words, the people have taken power into their own hands, and they are controlling their own lives.

And after 4,000 years of struggling against nature and foreign invaders- and the last 25 years, prior to the revolution, of struggling against French colonialism- I don’t think that the people of Vietnam are about to compromise in any way, shape or form about the freedom and independence of their country, and I think Richard Nixon would do well to read Vietnamese history, particularly their poetry, and particularly the poetry written by Ho Chi Minh.     – Jane Fonda

While American Soldiers were fighting and dying in the Vietnam War, Jane Fonda, the daughter of Henry Fonda, was using her money and influence at colleges and universities to gather support to advocate communism and encourage rebellion and anarchy against the United States Government

On November 21, 1970 she told a University of Michigan  audience of some two thousand students, “If you understood what communism was,  you would hope, you would pray on your knees that we would some day become communist.”

At Duke University in North Carolina she repeated what she had said in Michigan, adding “I, a socialist, think that we should strive toward a socialist society, all the way to communism. ”   Washington Times July 7, 2000

Jane Fonda began her participation in anti-war activities around 1967, allegedly after meeting with Communists while in France and with American citizens who were revolutionaries.   Her activities included active participation in demonstrations, rallies, radio broadcasts and plays.

Jane Fonda also helped in the organization of a production group called the F.T.A. (Fuck The Army).  This group helped to set up coffee houses near military bases where they would perform anti-war derogatory-type sketches for the visiting soldiers.  The coffee-house sketches were intended to counterpoint the U.S.O. shows, such as Bob Hope and other U.S.O. sponsored performers whose performances increased  morale and gave positive support to American soldiers.   Some of the F.T.A. coffee-house employees would mingle with the soldiers to help them to “relax and unwind”, while encouraging the soldiers to desert.   Some soldiers alleged that they were promised jobs and money by the
F.T.A.  if they deserted.

The Vietnam Veterans Against the War Organization received major financial support from Jane Fonda.  Jane Fonda’s F.T.A. coffee houses helped in recruiting soldiers and veterans for the Vietnam Veterans Against The War Organization.   The Vietnam Veterans Against the War Organization membership was approximately 7,000 at its highest.  The Organization’s membership number was comparatively low, when you consider that more than 2 1/2 million Americans served during the Vietnam  war.

Jane Fonda personally sought out returning American soldiers from Vietnam to solicit them to publicly speak out against American atrocities against Vietnamese women and children during her broadcasts.  North Vietnamese officials based in Canada allegedly coordinated her broadcasts.

In 1972 Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden and others traveled to North Vietnam to give their support to the North Vietnamese’s Government.  When she returned to the United States, she advised the news media that all of the American Prisoners of War were being well treated and were not being tortured.

As the American POWs returned home in 1973, they spoke out about the inhumane treatment and torture they had suffered as prisoners of war.  Their stories directly contradicted Jane Fonda’s earlier statements of 1972.    Some of the American POWs such as Senator John McCain, a former Presidential candidate, stated that he was tortured by his guards for refusing to meet with groups such as Jane Fonda’s.  Jane Fonda, in her response to these new allegations, referred to the returning POWs as being “hypocrites and liars.”

The Wall Street Journal (August 3, 1995) published an interview with Bui Tin who served on the General Staff of the North Vietnam Army and received the unconditional surrender of South Vietnam on April 30, 1975.  During the interview  Mr. Tin was asked if the American antiwar movement was important to Hanoi’s victory.  Mr. Tin responded “It was essential to our strategy”  referring to the war being fought on two fronts, the Vietnam battlefield and back home in America through the antiwar movement on college campuses and in the city streets.  He further stated the North Vietnamese leadership listened to the
American evening news broadcasts “to follow the growth of the American antiwar

Visits to Hanoi made by persons such as Jane Fonda, former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and various church ministers “gave us confidence  that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses.”  Mr. Tin surmised that “America lost because of its democracy; through dissent and protest it lost the ability to mobilize a will to win.”  Mr. Tin further advised that General Vo Nguyen Giap (Commanding General of the North Vietnam Army) said the 1968 Tet Offensive was a defeat.

The military defeat of North Vietnam after the Tet Offensive of 1968 became a political victory for North Vietnam because of anti-war demonstrations and the sensationalism of the news media.   The North Vietnamese interpreted the U.S. reaction to these events as the weakening of America’s resolve to win the war.   The North Vietnamese believed that victory could be theirs, if they stayed their course.

From 1969 until the end of the war, over 20,000 American soldiers lost their lives in a war that the United States did not have the resolve to win.  The sensationalism by the American news media and the anti-war protests following the 1968 Tet Offensive gave hope to Communist North Vietnam, strengthening their belief that their will to succeed was greater than ours.

Instead of seeking a successful resolution at the Paris Peace Conference following the disastrous defeat of the 1968 Tet Offensive, they employed delay tactics as another tool to inflame U.S. politics.  This delaying tactic spurned  further anti-war demonstrations.  Those who sensationalized their reporting of  the war and those who supported anti-war demonstrations are guilty of giving our enemy hope. Because of their actions, they must share partial responsibility for those 20,000 + Americans deaths.

We won the war on the battlefield but lost it back home on the college campuses and in the city streets.

Americans must realize that there are agents* operating in this Country attempting to undermine our Country and it’s leadership through our democratic principles in an effort to achieve a foreign country’s goal.  A prime example of such a person during the Vietnam War was Jane Fonda, an admitted Socialist, who blatantly supported North Vietnam. * Agent – Any person who works to attain the goals of another nation either for money or for their own political beliefs.

A valuable lesson was taught by North Vietnam to other nations on how the United States may be defeated by fighting a two front war – the battlefield and the American home front.  We must be aware of this vulnerability.   – Norman Schwarzkopf

In 1975, after the fall of the South Vietnam Government, Jane Fonda returned to Hanoi with her newborn son Troy for a celebration in her honor for the work she had done for North Vietnam.  During the celebration, her son was christened after a Viet Cong  hero, Nguyen Van Troi.  Troi had attempted to assassinate Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara while on his visit to South Vietnam in 1963.   The South Vietnam Government executed Troi for this attempted assassination.

I have heard and read that some people believe that Jane Fonda was simply young and impressionable.   Jane Fonda was born on December 21, 1937.   She was 34 years old when she made her infamous trip to North Vietnam and was in her 30’s when she participated in anti-war demonstrations and rallies.

During this same time period a large number of young American soldiers, who had not yet reached their 21st birthday, were fighting the war in Vietnam and were held accountable for all of their actions.  These same young soldiers were, upon their return to the United States, still not of legal age to buy alcoholic beverages.

Jane Fonda was an adult when she made these conscious decisions and actions, and
as such, she is responsible and should be held accountable.  The Vietnam Memorial Wall contains the names of 25,493 American soldiers who served their Country and paid the ultimate price for freedom who were under the age of 21 ( Casualty Statistics).

Many Veterans would have enjoyed seeing this mug shot of Jane Fonda taken for her treasonous acts,  instead of the bogus drug charge which was later dropped.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Left Wing Moonbat Hanoi Jane Fonda Claims Her QVC Appearance Was Canceled Over Protest Fears…

  1. WeeWeed says:

    I am of an age to remember every bit of this. “Hanoi Jane Fonda is a treasonous Left-Wing Bitch and I will not stand by while history is re-written. Not on my watch.” Exactly right, SD.
    Dear Jane, my father was over there at the time you were pulling these ‘stunts.’ If I had had any idea that you were scheduled to be on QVC whenever, I’d have called them myself and tweeted the universe in protest. You should have been tried for treason at the time. Bitch.
    May your book earn you what you deserve.


  2. Solaratov says:

    One is also reminded that, when hanoi jane met some American POWs, one of them slipped her a note that had the service numbers and SSNs of the POWs.
    Little janey promptly turned the note over to the north vietnamese – which earned the POWs “extra attention” from their torturers.

    She is scum. The lowest form of bottom-feeding filth. She may think that it’s “gone on too long” – but it will go on until every Vietnam Veteran has a chance to piss on hanoi jane’s grave. Then, it will be long enough.

    (I’d include john [the coward] kerry in there, too, but that’s another thread.)


    • WeeWeed says:

      Agreed on John Effin, Sol. Another thread entirely. I will add to your sentence about every VN veteran pissin’ on her grave – I include the children of those veterans pissin’ on her grave, and maybe even grandchildren.
      They didn’t call her Hanoi Jane because she graced a stripper pole over there, folks.


    • Rick says:

      I find what Jane Fonda did to be very treasonous. However, your comment that about her passing on SSNs of POWs is not true. That information is not correct per FactCheck.org. We need to stick to the facts and what appears in the article seems to be correct. But Slaratorv’s comments are not correct.



      • WeeWeed says:

        Is factcheck.org the same two O-bots that live in the basement at snopes?? Is it not true because SHE says it isn’t??


        • Rick says:

          What Jane Fonda did 40 years ago has nothing to do with Obama. Jane Fonda’s actions are dispicable, but I won’t blame her for things she didn’t do – only those things she did do, which is plenty. And bringing Obama into the discussion hurts the credibility of the whole point of this article and that is to remind people of the horrible actions of that woman.


        • stellap says:

          factcheck.org is the organization that is funded by Annenberg Public Policy Center, the very same that funded an initiative in Chicago that both Barack Obama and Bill Ayers worked on. Any connection? Don’t know.


          • Rick says:

            Once again, folks, this is not an Obama issue. It’s a Jane Fonda is a traitor issue. FactCheck.org spells out what happened and based on the information obtained from them it’s pretty clear that Jane Fonda did treasonous acts. But yet people aren’t happy with that. They assume that since Jane Fonda did “X” that she must have done “Y” and “Z” also. And, if anyone says she didn’t do “Y” and “Z” then they are an Obama-loving commie. Jane Fonda was a radical extremist and it appears another group of radical extremists here are hell bent on rewriting history to suit their own agenda. Both groups make me sick and neither one represent the ideals of what it is to be a true American.


            • WeeWeed says:

              If you’re determined to get into a circular logic argument on this issue, drop it. By “O-bots” I meant those that are hell bent on defending the far-left-communist/socialist/marxist agenda no matter the individual subject OR facts (in this case, the sainted jane fonda.) And if we make you sick, buzz off.



  3. There are few people around who illicit such a visceral response when they speak on issues. Hanoi Jane and Barack Obama have this commonality.

    She has never had a come-to-Jesus moment and mea culpa for her horrid, horrific decisions when she was well into her 30’s. These were not the immature decisions of a naive Teen or twenty something. These were calculated, planned, organized, and well thought out decisions she made in her 30’s. There is no excuse. There never will be an excuse.

    In her adult lifetime she has claimed on numerous occasions that Socialism and Communism are so wonderful that we should actually “pray” (her words) for their development and arrival in our country. Contrast that against the ridiculous self-serving claim to be a patriotic American.


  4. WeeWeed says:

    The Misunderstood Jane’s blog here.



  5. redawson says:

    You’ve written an excellent, comprehensive, and historically accurate article including use of her own remarks to condemn her own actions, that she now “regrets” (wink-wink). I just went to her (Hanoi Jane’s) blog and read some comments from her supporters and her replies (mainly of thanks for their support). I would say we have a major divide in this country today perhaps more so than during the Vietnam War. Hanoi Jane is now supporting Palestine (under the guise of Women’s Rights . . . just as long as it is not Israeli Women’s Rights). In my opinion, she still is a Communist wanting the destruction and reconstruction of Western society as long as she can still, personally use the (Capitalistic) system and the freedom it provides to live-it-up high-on-the-hog, to use a couple of cliches. Sadly her whiny cry-baby lies will ring as truth to her fans and they would never ever be caught reading a conservative point of view that deals with the facts of history. Obama lied and still lies with impunity. Jane lied and still lies with impunity (putting QVC aside). Anyway, thanks for the article.


  6. If this Hanoi Jane Fonda was on fire, I’d immediately go look for a fire extinguisher. Yes, I would. I’d make sure that the fire didn’t spread to anything of value.


  7. Silent Man says:

    On bulliten board sites, I often hear how Jane Fonda supposedly apologized for what she did during her stay in Vietnam. It doens’t matter, traitors often apologize right before they are executed after trial. She just never got the trial she so rightly deserves. And she does deserve a trial, a speedy one, and a quick sentencing and judgement of her treason!


    • garnette says:

      I believe it was also one of those non apology apologies where she doesn’t really apology for her actions but that no one else sees her actions as she does. She seems to change the tone of this apology in 2005 when she says she has no regrets for going to North Vietnam.

      She married Ted Turner in 1991, but I thought she was with him when she made the “apology” because he needed her to be more conservative. If you look at how she acts politically it is usually connected to how liberal the man she is with is. Now, it could be that she finally doesn’t need to validate herself by who she is with.


  8. marvin doll says:

    We ain’t Fonda Jane!


  9. bzstoned says:

    I think what Fonda’s trip to Vietnam was great! Piss on America and all you war loving retards.


    • stellap says:

      Perhaps you would like to describe that trip to us, and the merits of her visit. Of course, based upon the language you are using here, you probably were not born for at least another 15 years after that visit, and know nothing about it. Hence the usual liberal namecalling and disrespect for our country. Perhaps you are not a citizen? If you are, perhaps you might like to relocate to Vietnam. I hear the weather is great.

      ADD: I just checked, and see that you are indeed not living in the United States. Try not to embarrass your fellow citizens.


  10. Terry Baker says:

    Charlie kicked our ass in Vietnam. Didn’t need Fonda’s help.


    • WeeWeed says:

      No, CONGRESS kicked our ass – not Charlie.


      • zmalfoy says:

        Agreed. From my reading of what was happening — not MSM reports of the time — the US Military was doing well. Once the MSM got involved, they twisted, distorted, and sometimes flat out lied about events, to make it look like the US was loosing. This prompted the protests and then Congress to cave to the whims of the MSM– which were already known to be well established homes for communists like Walter Duranty.

        So, as has been true since Stalin (and likely before): The Times Lied, People Died.


      • barnslayer says:

        Agreed. Our pilots were prevented from bombing NVA supply stockpiles in the North. They were not allowed to destroy the Soviet ship permanently docked in the north giving NV missiles radar guidance. They were not allowed to destroy enemy Migs on the ground. This was all thanks to the democrats LBJ and McNamara and their rules of engagement.


  11. French Reader says:

    No, Zophie, the US Military did not do well in VN. Why ? because the US Military could not get, for many various reasons, any support from the South-Vietnamese people. There was too much hatred on both sides.


Comments are closed.