American Thinker Article. The Keystone of the Islamic Milieu: “Inbreeding” – Author Ann Barnhardt

Celebrating the first article by Dagny (Ann Barnhardt) for American Thinker. Treepers roar with approval from amid all the branches, “Way to Go Dagny” !! Whoot.

The darkest hour is just before dawn. A huge swath of this planet, from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Philippine Sea, has been held in a synthetic, forced nightfall for nearly fourteen centuries. But the sunrise is coming, it is coming sooner rather than later, and this light will be the life of men.

Everywhere in the western world, people look at the savage violence that is a daily occurrence in the Muslim world and shake their heads in stunned disbelief. A pastor of a very small Christian flock in Florida burns a Koran. Weeks later at literally the global antipode, Muslim imams drive through neighborhoods in a vehicle with loudspeakers attached, calling the townsfolk to riot. The townsfolk respond, and before it is all over, at least 22 innocent people are dead at the hands of these townsfolk, with at least two of them beheaded. How is this possible? How can this be? How can human behavior and culture be so monstrously different? Is this difference attributable to nothing more than environmental nurture theory?

No. There is something else. There is a catalyst — absent in every other culture on earth — that has poisoned the cultural soil, thus yielding the fruit of bad harvest for nearly 1,400 years. That catalyst is inbreeding. As a direct result, the Muslim population is mentally developmentally disabled on a mass scale.

All human cultures display strict prohibitions against inbreeding and consanguineous marriage. Incest is a universal taboo. This is a transcendent anthropological fact. As a Roman Catholic, I attribute this to what is called “The Natural Law.” Every human person without exception is created by God with a deep, innate knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong. Stabbing someone in the neck for no reason whatsoever is just as wrong here in Lone Tree, Colorado as it is in the Amazon basin, as it is on the high plateaus of Mongolia.

But there is one culture, one faux “religion,” that expressly condones and encourages consanguineous marriage and breeding. That system is Islam, and the document that explicitly ratifies incest is the Koran, specifically Sura 4 verse 23:

Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated the marriage — if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time — but do not break up existing marriages.

Sounds like an exhaustive list — but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed. In the Muslim culture, marriage and breeding between first cousins has existed since day one. Mohammed himself married Zaynab, who was his father’s sister’s daughter. Mohammed and Zaynab were direct first cousins.

Marrying your first cousin is the genetic equivalent of marrying your half-sibling. Think of your own family. Let’s say your dad has a sister, who is “Aunt Linda” to you. Your dad and Aunt Linda, being full siblings, have exactly the same genetic constitution. Their family trees prior to their generation are identical. Therefore, if Aunt Linda has any children, who are your first cousins, they are, in genetic terms, 50% identical to you. You share one of your two genetic constituencies with your cousins, thus making them genetically the same as a half-sibling would be.

First cousin marriage for just one generation is extremely risky in and of itself. This is why virtually every other culture on earth prohibits it, and treats it as a cultural taboo. When two people come together who carry so many similar genetic alleles, the chance of an undesirable recessive trait expressing itself in their offspring soars. Now, understanding that single-generational risk, understand that Muslims have been marrying their first cousins over and over again for 1,400 years. Sit in stillness for a moment with the full, terrifying gravity of this.

The Reproductive Health Journal reports the following rates on consanguinity in Muslim countries. Where a statistical range has been recorded, I have used the lower parameter:

Algeria: 22.6%
Bahrain: 39.4%
Egypt (North): 20.9%
Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%
Iraq: 47.0%
Jordan: 28.5%
Kuwait: 22.5%
Lebanon: 12.8%
Libya: 48.4%
Mauritania: 47.2%
Morocco: 19.9%
Oman: 56.3%
Palestine: 17.5%
Qatar: 54.0%
Saudi Arabia: 42.1%
Sudan: 44.2%
Syria: 30.3%
Tunisia: 20.1%
United Arab Emirates: 40.0%
Yemen: 40.0%

Muslim men are never, ever allowed to be around, see, converse with or otherwise interact with any females outside of their families. However, they are permitted to act as chaperones for their female first cousins. If your first cousin is the only person of the opposite sex you ever get to interact with, is it any surprise that Muslims are marrying their first cousins more as the rule than as the exception?

According to the BBC, 55% of Pakistani-Britons are married to a first cousin, and as a corollary to that produce “just under a third” of all children in the UK with genetic illnesses, despite being only 3% of the total births.

As a direct result of inbreeding, the Muslim population is the only population on earth that is mentally and physically devolving. This inherent weakness makes Muslim populations more susceptible to nefarious, oppressive leadership and mass manipulation. The amount of objective evidence supporting this statement is colossal and obvious.

But there is hope. All is not lost. In my education in animal husbandry, I was keenly interested in my genetics classes. One of the key concepts in farm animal genetics is “hybrid vigor.” This is the genetic principle which states that the crossbreeding of two genetically diverse plants or animals of the same species yields offspring of increased vigor and other superior qualities. All plants and animals have been designed to “bring out the best in themselves,” and our DNA has built-in fail-safes to edit and correct any flaws which creep into our DNA over time. Given this, if the people now living under the fist of Islam are finally freed and can court and love and marry whomever they choose, thus reopening the genetic pool, this will allow hybrid vigor to cleanse and restore to full health their populations.

“. . .et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt .”

Great Job Dagny.!! In addition here is another perspective and article highlighting the same concern:   The Problem of Inbreeding in Islam by Nicolai Sennels

Both Dagny and Sennels present a similar consideration.   Both capture the problem of discussing such truths and the prohibition by Political Correctness (Political Marxism) within conversations, and fact-based considerations, of genetics and inbreeding.   We must discuss such truths even in the face of prohibition by political correctness.

The tragic effect of the left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as  an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”

So for the sake of avoiding  discussion based on truth, society is condemned to abide in a world of false impressions.   Dagny and Sennels deconstruct these falsehoods and expose the realities.   Great job…….. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. (John 1) ……./SD

ps.  Note to Dagny.  John is my favorite.  Since the time of my childhood and early Christian learnings, John has been my hero.  The one, the ONLY one, to stand firm at the base of the cross during the crucifixion.  John represents the purest form of loyalty.  When all others feared for themselves, and allowed that fear to overwhelm and cower them, it was John who never doubted, held vigil for Jesus, and stood loyal in the face of incredibly horrid possibilities.   Surrounded by women (irrelevant in the minds of Romans) the only male to stand strong and bathe in the agony of Christ’s Death was John.   John bore witness.  Thank you for including that.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to American Thinker Article. The Keystone of the Islamic Milieu: “Inbreeding” – Author Ann Barnhardt

  1. G8rMom7 says:

    I posted this in the other thread from earlier today but it is specifically a question about this article so I’m copying it here too.

    Also, in regards to them “devolving” due to inbreeding…how long will it take them to just vanish? Obviously we can’t wait that long. We may be able to wait long enough for them to blow themselves up though. Sorry, I know I’m sick but I really hate that we and our brave men have been protecting and fighting FOR these lunatics rather than just fighting them head on.

    Like

  2. Gypsy says:

    This is a real education for me. I never thought about it in that way and did not realize they married 1st cousins. We need more education about Muslims because it would help understand to know what we are up against. These are not rational people and their race is doomed to anniliation (sp) because of this inbreeding.

    Like

  3. texan59 says:

    Kind of makes you wonder about the royals in jolly old England as well.

    The only downside to the inbreeding (besides all the icky stuff) is that it takes entirely too long for them to breed themselves out of existence. The good thing about it is that the more they breed the dumber they get, so, hopefully it will be much more difficult to find one with enough functioning brain cells to actually pull off their plots

    Like

    • WeeWeed says:

      LOL!! (the brits, I’m sorry…..it’s true, and I’m sorry…..) 🙂

      Like

    • Ad rem says:

      I hear that it takes a minimum of 4 functioning gray cells rubbing against each other to produce enough friction for ignition.

      Like

    • You know, you said something very profound in that snark. It is actually a real fact on the ground that when our military engages these radical islamist Muslim types they are routinely identified as “dumb fighters”. One recent example is their fleeing a fight with our troops in Afghanistan. We happened to intercept a communique radio message during the fight where the leader of the Taliban group was yelling at his soldiers over the radio screaming at them “what are you doing”? , “why are you not fighting the infidels better”?, the return voice from the Taliban fighter told his boss via the radio in a panic tone “these Americans run toward our bullets, they are crazy” he said. The Leader screamed back “don’t be a baby, its a war”! Then the radio went silent…. LOL 😀 I’ll try to find the link to the story, it was priceless. 😀

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s