Ted Cruz (TX) – This Guy Scares The Hell Out of Liberals….

It was sad to see Jim DeMint leave the Senate earlier this year.   However, it is wonderful to see Freshman Senator Ted Cruz strike fear into the heart of liberals.

They are freaking out at his direct confrontational approach to their ideology.

Ted Cruz 2

However, with such fear will come a massive onslaught of attacks against him by the progressive left and the institutional media.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Tea Party, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Ted Cruz (TX) – This Guy Scares The Hell Out of Liberals….

  1. BigMamaTEA says:

    Man Schumer is such a douche! Is that why Hagel took $$ from Friends of Hamas?

    The hearings are such BS. Coburn told us in a town hall that the applicants are SO COACHED that they hard to get straight answers from them.

    Like

  2. WeeWeed says:

    “…Ornery, swaggering piece of work…” – NYT

    High praise from that broke and failing catbox liner, indeed!! :lol:

    Like

  3. St. Benedict's Thistle says:

    I’m not sure how wonderful Sen. Cruz performed on the gun control issue. I felt he was actually ceding ground to the ‘pro-gun safety’ crowd, to quote Schumer. He made some points, but they were swallowed up by the tandem duo of Gregory and Schumer. To let Schumer demagogue with words like ‘reasonable’ gun control, and letting Gregory accuse the NRA of lying about armed guards in the Obama girls’ school, is problematic. You have to control the conversation, oppose any and every false narrative and hit back hard. Seems like Cruz has already caught that old senatorial syndrome that turns most of ‘em into ‘statesmen’ (cough, cough).

    Like

    • canadacan says:

      I love Ted Cruz but you’re right. Imagine what our own Young Gun Shapiro would have done in that argument.

      Like

    • retire2005 says:

      “I felt he was actually ceding ground to the ‘pro-gun safety’ crowd, to quote Schumer”

      Actually, no, he wasn’t. He was pointing out that the “assault” weapons ban did not have any effect on crimes committed with assault weapons, and, as a matter of fact, the number of rifle murders had actually DEcreased since the lifting of that ban. And don’t get off in the weeds over the “armed guards in the Obama’s girls’ school.” And yes, even the NRA supported not selling weapons to those with criminal backgrounds or histories of severe mental illness.

      And no, Ted has not “already caught that old senatorial syndrome” but he doesn’t subscribe to hyperbole, and personally, I don’t want him, as my Senator, to start.

      Why do you think the NYSlimes is coming out attacking Cruz hard? It is because Ted is a brilliant litigator, and smart as a whip, and they know that he is not going to play nicey-nice out of deference to the good ole’ boy policy in D.C. Of course, if Ted were a Democrat, the NYSlimes would never attack him because that would be politically incorrect since he is “Hispanic.”

      I spoke with Ted’s office last week, and was told that Ted thinks since the press is now going after him, he is doing something right. And the press doesn’t like it.

      Sometimes, it is better to let your opponent run his mouth. Every thing he then says, can, and will be, used against him. Don’t judge someone on what they say, or don’t say, judge them on what they do. Remember, Ted Cruz was one of only three Senators that had the cajones to vote against John Kerry as Secretary of State. Watch was he does, not what he says.

      Like

      • St. Benedict's Thistle says:

        You make some good points. However, letting the press and progressives spout lies without correction is problematic, for it gives the appearance of truth to the lie…and many people will not have the chance to see what Sen. Cruz does as opposed to what he says. They will be left with the lie. Bit by bit, the lie becomes the ‘truth’. We have seen that over and over again, and millions of low information voters confirm it.

        Like

        • retire2005 says:

          How did Cruz not dispute what was saying? Perhaps you heard something I did not. He pointed out the fallacy of the assault weapons ban, pointed out that since that ban was lifted, rifle crimes have decreased, not increased. Just what did you want him to say?

          As to the “low information” voter. Good luck trying to get any message out to them. They don’t watch news channels; they watch Dancing with the Stars and American Idol. That’s what makes them low information voters.

          Like

  4. czarowniczy says:

    OK, my cats and I scare the hell out of mice and rats in my feed room but none so far have had a catharsis and decided to eat at Denny’s instead. I’m more in favor of a giant liberal-rat-bastard trap, baited with entitlements, that snaps shut and…well, use your imagination. If truth and good intentions worked to convert these social mutants the likes of Reagan and Rush would have had us swimming in Born Again Conservatives by now. Democrats learned a long time ago that taking the low-and-easy road is too big of a lure for a large segment of the population to resist, doing the right thing goes straight into the Thing Too Hard Too Do box. Now…back to that trap idea…

    Like

  5. texan59 says:

    The junior Senator from Texas has now been in office for about seven weeks. I think he has done exactly what he told us he was going to do. While he may not have been as forceful as we would like, you have to remember that when you go on the “Sunday Shows” as an R, you are going to get whip-sawed for the entire time you are on there. Before we cast too many stones, try to remember what it’s like when you get into an argument with your favorite liberal relative. They are usually pretty good at rattling off about seven talking points at one time. While they can’t back up anything they say, they will keep hammering at you from about 42 different directions waiting for you to make one slip. I’m happy with him and I’m gonna be sending him some mo money soon to let him know I appreciate his work so far. My $.02. :)

    Like

    • canadacan says:

      You make an excellent point Mr tex. I have a whole bunch of relatives like that and they are a pain in the ass deal with. He is going to get whip sawed. He has taken the hardDifficult Honest road. we need to support him

      Like

  6. eoow says:

    Lest we forget Senator Clinton, Junior Senator from New York:
    Senate speech (10 October 2002)

    I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, “We are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!”

    Like

  7. Justin says:

    Liberals should fear Ted Cruz. Killary Cliton doesn’t stand a chance against him. He will tear her up through a debate and get the grass roots to vote again. You are looking at the next Ronald Reagan revolution when you look at Ted Cruz. If I were liberals, I would be looking else where for a 2016 candidate. For a conservative, we hope she is the nominee. She has no achievements, just titles through Washington connections. She will be known as a 70 year old Washington product. Ted Cruz 2016!!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s