Bumper Sticker Of The Day…

Or you can just use your Colorado Democrat approved rape whistle.  I’m sure that’ll work just as well.  The Morlock Revolt has a special Glock 9mm Rape Whistle.  Check it out!  :D

About these ads

About Patriot Dreamer

“When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed.” ~Ayn Rand *************************************************** In the battle between good intentions vs. unintended consequences….UC always win. ~Sharon
This entry was posted in Bumper Stickers. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Bumper Sticker Of The Day…

  1. sirwin says:

    nice Sig Sauer

  2. Josh says:

    Homeland Security: Border Agents To “Run And Hide” If They Encounter Illegals
    http://www.westernjournalism.com/homeland-security-border-agents-to-run-and-hide-if-they-encounter-illegals/

    ‘Run, hide, fight’: Homeland Security releases public service video on how to get to safety and survive a mass shooting
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2180041/Run-hide-fight-Homeland-Security-releases-public-service-video-to-safety-survive-mass-shooting.html#ixzz2LMlqISUJ

  3. Sharon says:

    I suppose they’ll be issuing protocols (and provide training?) for proper use of Rape Whistles.

    Can you imagine the trauma for some stalker who is whistled at–and then it turns out he really was just stalking, and didn’t intend to rape. Laws need to be changed so that he can file Hate Whistling charges.

    Will a woman in Colorado be allowed to whistle against her husband? If man gives his girlfriend a whistle for her birthday, will that be considered an implied threat? Will whistles have to have a Disabling Pea to prevent it from being whistled accidentally? Will they have to kept out of reach of children? I would think so–because when we were young, our parents bought us those cheap 15 cent whistles just so that we could run far away from the house (on the farm) and blow that thing until our ears hurt. Will they sell cabinets for locking them up when the ladies are at home?

    Will whistles now be taken away from police officers who perhaps use them when directing traffic on busy intersections wherever? If they are not taken away from the police, will there need to be additional foot patrols to protect the women in the area who can be raped with impunity in the vicinity of active police work, because her whistle will lost in the cacaphony of all the other whistles.

    There’s a whole new field opening up for whistling legislative and legal work. Gives a whole new meaning to “whistle while you work…”

    • Hysterical but so true.

    • czarowniczy says:

      My wife, a gun-totin’ audiologist/speech pathologist suggests that the Feds may have to suspend sales of rape whistles until the various Federal agencies which would have oversight of the health-related aspects of their use study the matter. Is there a standardized loudness level for the whistles and are those SPLs approved by the EPA, HEW, et cetera. Would the SPL levels cause either the user or usee auditory damage? Is there an in-depth instruction sheet on the correct and safe use of the whistle, printed in every language that potential US users read, including braille? Are any of the materials in the whistle known in the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects, acid indigestion or interference with Shirley McClain’s channeling of spirit guides? Does the use of the whistle in any way cause the whistlee to feel his/her self image is devalued in the process as being unfairly designated as a criminal without benefit of judicial process? Does the whistle pose a choking hazard to children, adults or the California condor? Has the whistle been manufactured under fair trade conditions?
      I’ll quit here – I can see some bureaucrat in the Federal Department of Stupid Ideas starting to salivate at the prospect of making this farce a reality.

    • yankeeintx says:

      The ramifications are endless. Imagine if there are any sports fields in close proximity to a college. All those coaches and referees!

  4. Josh says:

    Just a “shooting spree”!

    Tustin, California shooting spree: Orange County crime spree began with apparent carjacking

    Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/tustin-california-shooting-spree-orange-county-crime-spree-began-with-apparent-carjacking#ixzz2LMxyZHRv

    spree
    noun
    1. a lively frolic or outing.
    2. a bout or spell of drinking to intoxication; binge; carousal.
    3. a period, spell, or bout of indulgence, as of a particular wish, craving, or whim: an eating spree; a spending spree.
    4. a period or outburst of extreme activity: Our basketball team went on a scoring spree and won 114 to 78.

  5. yankeeintx says:

    My seven year old just looked over my shoulder, so I asked her which girl looked safe? She pointed at the girl on the right. I asked “why”? She said “because she has a gun to protect herself”. Nice to know my seven year old understands. Must be because she is homeschooled.

  6. doodahdaze says:

    I wonder if all these crazed new kook gun control laws are ex-post facto?
    Some common-law jurisdictions do not permit retroactive criminal legislation, though new precedent generally applies to events that occurred before the judicial decision. Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3. In some nations that follow the Westminster system of government, such as the United Kingdom, ex post facto laws are technically possible, because the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy allows Parliament to pass any law it wishes. In a nation with an entrenched bill of rights or a written constitution, ex post facto legislation may be prohibited.
    So what is up with this. How can they criminalize a gun you have legally now?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s