Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot – Beyond Indoctrination: Fabian Socialists In The School System “Distributive Property”?…. Behave, Good Little Bolsheviks’, Behave…..

Staggering to bear witness.   What the heck is the “Distributive Property” of math?  Anyone?

(From Neal Boortz via Weasel Zippers)  This really has to be seen to be believed … so the picture is here for you to see.  This is a page out of a work book for your government school student.  What school and what school book I can’t tell you … maybe the lady who sent this to me will step forward and let us know.


This is how our government schools – and the liberals who run them – effectively brainwash (though indoctrinate is a much more polite word) our children into accepting the liberal philosophy as basic truth.  This particular worksheet is meant to help your government student “understand the distributive property.”  Now I’m not a dreary slouch at math … but this is the first time in my life I’ve ever heard of the distributive property. 

fabian-400-glassI strongly suspect that pretty much any student can move through school to a very successful life as a productive adult without ever having heard those words.

Really … look at this Bolshoi.  “6 groups of (3+5) = 6 groups of 3 + 6 groups of 5”  I challenge any government school teacher to call the show today and tell me why this is important.  What’s important is that the student be able to figure out what 3+5 equals (8) and that 6×8 = 48.

That, as you have guessed if you’ve looked at the picture, isn’t the real problem here.  The problem is HOW this government school document teaches the lesson.  The headline at the top of the document reads “Distribute the Wealth.”  And there you have the picture of the pretty little girl with the cute little pony tail.  She’s holding a bag of money in one hand, and giving away some of that money with the other.  Yes!  She’s distributing her wealth!

But if you study the picture you’ll see there’s an even more subtle message.  She’s not handing money away from her wallet or her purse.  No!  That wouldn’t get the real message across!  Why pretty much every little girl has a wallet or a purse.

No .. this little sweetheart has a BAG of money!  Not every little girl has BAGS of money … so this girl must be really RICH!  And since she’s rich her money needs to be redistributed!  So she’s being a good little rich girl  and she’s smiling as she hands her money away.  (read more)


About these ads
This entry was posted in A New America, Cannibalism, Communist, Dem Hypocrisy, Obama Research/Discovery, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Socialist, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, Union Activity - ALL. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot – Beyond Indoctrination: Fabian Socialists In The School System “Distributive Property”?…. Behave, Good Little Bolsheviks’, Behave…..

  1. scubachick75 says:

    You really haven’t heard of the distributive property? I learned it in school and so did my son. In basic math it’s supposed to make it easier for you to do the math in your head. In Algebra it’s used to gt rid of parentheses.

  2. tara says:

    It doesn’t make any sense at all to equate the distributive property to money handling. And it appears that the person who designed this lesson realized it, because they were unable to work it in to any part of the lesson, just the title. Pathetic !

    What is that shooting star thing at the top? I’ve seen that before. I swear it’s in some government ad, something like “you should know” or “you need to know”. I’m going to try to find it. Did this lesson come from the government?

  3. Justice4All says:

    ” You can not multiply wealth by dividing it”
    Adrian Rogers

    • Thom says:

      however simply put you can. If you have 1000$ and you divide it into 500$ & 500$ and you give it to two people and they earn 1000$ each you’ve divided your wealth and multiplied it by 2. But that’s simply put and the world is far from simple.

      • FedUp says:

        Minus taxes, the wage for the person doing the dividing, etc. etc. Simply giving to 2 different people for the purpose of multiplying it is investing and you get a return. The other giving is for charity, and that is definitely not what “distribute the wealth” is called.

  4. akathesob says:

    This new math is just creepy.

    • Thom says:

      new math isn’t even taught anymore, it was a real thing in the 1960s, it lasted for about 10 years, but since nobody liked it they pulled it from classrooms.

      • Patriot Dreamer says:

        Here in Washington state, they change how they teach math every few years. I think the latest iteration here is called “reform math”.

  5. Sentenza says:

    It’s only a matter of time ’til she’s a “Kulak” and then gets stuffed in a gulag.

  6. Inkraven says:

    Since the money is being “distributed”, it’s clearly not hers. We all know the person doing the distributing never does so with their own money.

    Also, as someone who teaches math, I find that particular “lesson” asinine.

  7. ThatOldGuy says:

    The distributive property is an absolutely legitimate and non-controversial mathematical property. That said, whoever made the sheet has an (conscious or unconscious) agenda.

  8. czarowniczy says:

    Can’t wait until Obama institutes the Young Pioneers in every Federal-fund-receiving school. The ‘get their minds while they’re young’ routine works, look at how for the last 50 years or so the young have been taught that America is a greedy, imperialist, racist, culture-killing country and how all of the problems that minorities face today are the result of white socioeconomic an cultural oppression. Gotta get me one of those neat red scarves with Obama’s picture on the slider as soon as they come out.

  9. Gayle Clute says:

    The distributive property states that operations performed on variables within parentheses leads to the identical value as if the parentheses were not there. The operation “distributes” itself through the parentheses.

  10. Josh says:

    Hopefully Zach’s parents will set him straight.

  11. LouDaJew says:

    with all the crazy assault weapon ban talk, and our rights being trampled on, this just falls into the category of irrelevant and nonsensical. it’s just applying the formula. it’s called math application.

  12. LouDaJew says:

    this should be a top story IMO. Part 1 and 2 are awesome and AJ did an excellent job.

  13. John Denney says:


    A very good book, amusingly written, sometimes inadvertently so, as on page 53: “If the motor-car flies past us going 10 yards per second, a simple bit of mental arithmetic will show us that this is equivalent — while it lasts — to a rate of 600 yards per minute, or over 20 miles per hour.”

    Woo hoo! 20 miles per hour was something in 1914!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s