Everything we outline in this series: “The New America” is beyond a speculative doubt. This is WHAT WILL HAPPEN – Please do not question intellectual honesty and years of research – counter if you choose – but as the sun rises tomorrow, so too will these things come to pass.

      • Part I Here  – 10 Fundamentals – Pragmatically paying back the winners.
      • Part II Here – Faith Based Acceptance – Care for your family
      • Part III Here  – The 51st State – how to embedd dependency
      • Part IV Here –  The “new” legislative process – Senate New Approach

These are not “predictions” per se’ any more than assembling the puzzle pieces and accepting the completed picture is bearing witness.    This part will deal with known goals and long term agenda objectives during T-2.

Higher Education – and we don’t mean increased use of marijuana.  As you are well aware in 2011 a system of governmental takeover of college finances was completed within the structure of Obamacare legislation.    As of right now the federal government no longer “underwrites” PELL Grants for college students, it actually funds them.

This was sold to the broader public as a way for the government to “save money” because they were cutting out the middle man, the banks and lenders.   However, a greater goal was underneath the entire construct, CONTROL.   If the federal government can determine the loan rates for college students the exiting college debt is now owned by the federal government completely.   They can asses and determine the re-payment options available.   ie. work in public service for 10 years and have your college loan debt extinguished.

RIF’s.  With anticipated cuts to defense budgets you can fully expect large scale lay-offs in defense sector industry, as well as large scale reductions in the size and scope of all U.S. military operations.   This is one anticipated outcome from a leftist/progressive view of the world – and our overarching footprint upon it.

Unfortunately, this also allows for those of less principly minded governance to extend the range and scope of their international presence.   Indeed, increased expansion of Islam into other nations is all but assured without the possibility of secure and soverign borders facilitated by the strength of the U.S. military.   Russia, China and Iran will draw the greatest and most immediate benefit.   Israel becomes the biggest loser, a ruminant victim in the waiting,  surrounded by the rabid wolves and big cats of Islam.

In addition the expansion of the United Nation into U.S. constitutional governance.   As noted with the first step of our enagement with the UN small arms treaty:

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee’s call on Wednesday to renew debate over a draft international treaty to regulate the $70 billion global conventional arms trade.

U.N. delegates and gun control activists have complained that talks collapsed in July largely because Obama feared attacks from Republican rival Mitt Romney if his administration was seen as supporting the pact, a charge Washington denies.

The month-long talks at U.N. headquarters broke off after the United States – along with Russia and other major arms producers – said it had problems with the draft treaty and asked for more time.

But the U.N. General Assembly’s disarmament committee moved quickly after Obama’s win to approve a resolution calling for a new round of talks March 18-28. It passed with 157 votes in favor, none against and 18 abstentions.

U.N. diplomats said the vote had been expected before Tuesday’s U.S. presidential election but was delayed due to Superstorm Sandy, which caused a three-day closure of the United Nations last week.

An official at the U.S. mission said Washington’s objectives have not changed.

“We seek a treaty that contributes to international security by fighting illicit arms trafficking and proliferation, protects the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade, and meets the concerns that we have been articulating throughout,” the official said.

“We will not accept any treaty that infringes on the constitutional rights of our citizens to bear arms,” he said.

U.S. officials have acknowledged privately that the treaty under discussion would have no effect on domestic gun sales and ownership because it would apply only to exports.   (article)

Share