Blow By Blow Account Of Obama Ballot Challenge In Georgia Courtroom

  • Georgia proceedings (Part 1) By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am

    Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

    The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

    Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

    The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

    With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

    Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

    Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

    After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

    Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his, and his clients peril.

    Game on.

    5 minutes.

    10 minutes.

    15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

    20 minutes.

    It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plantiffs table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.

    Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?

    Certainly not.

    Court is called to order.

    Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

    Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

    Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

    Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

    June 27th 1962 is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the freedom of information act.

    Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

    It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

    The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

    Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

    Carl Swinson takes the stand.

    Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

    2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

    Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

    Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

    RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

    DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

    Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

    Dreams From My Father entered.

    Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

    Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

    This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

    At this point, the judge takes a recess.

    The judge returns.

    David Farrar takes the stand.

    Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

    Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

    Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

     Part 2 – State Licensed PI takes the stand.l 
  • She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the year 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

    Same SS number came up with addresses in IL. D.C. and MA.

    Next witness takes the stand.

    This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

    Linda Jordan takes the stand.

    Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E-Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

    Next witness.

    Mr. Gogt.

    Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

    Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in photo shop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

    States this is a product of layering.

    Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

    Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

    Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

    Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

    Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

    Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Soetoro, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

    Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

    Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

    Taitz shows records for Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

    Taitz takes the stand herself.

    Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

    Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

    Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

    And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

    What can we take away from this?

    It’s interesting.

    Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.

    One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.

    WHO THE **** IS THIS GUY?

    Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his social security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.

    One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.

    What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

    It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.

    Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Blow By Blow Account Of Obama Ballot Challenge In Georgia Courtroom

  1. zmalfoy says:

    Dang. All in one place. All court testimony.
    And finally, finally! Maybe one judge who will do their duty to their country, to actually hear the case and consider it, which is more than has been happening. . .

  2. Brooklyn says:

    What will the judge decide…? It would appear that Judge Malihi will enter a default judgment (as stated in his chambers prior to the hearing) and recommend (on or about February 5th) to Secretary of State Brian Kemp (who stated to obama’s attorney “suspend your participation…at your own peril”) that obama is not eligible to appear on the Georgia primary ballot for POTUS.

    As you say, Z – “DANG!” This is a HUGE step towards unraveling the true identity of this mystery man in the WH; what had previously been just Internet scuttlebutt is now on record in a court of law.

    I’ve got Georgia on my mind this morning – THANK YOU!

    See this TP site, were they state possibly a bit prematurely, “obama Ruled Not Eligible as NBC”: http://www.tpath.org/tpath_menu.php

    But, today, will also give us PROOF, beyond a reasonable doubt that the MSM and many of this new media (the online blogosphere) will protect obama and his left-winged agenda at all costs by making fun of, or not reporting, this extremely important story.

    Thank you, Menagerie… :)

    • I’ve got Georgia on my mind this morning

    • Kobe24 says:

      I get updates from one of the lawyers presenting this case. They don’t want a ‘default judgement’ but would prefer the Judge accepts the case as presented and rules on the evidence. Once a case is decided ‘on the merits’ the Judge’s interpretation of the evidence is generally not able to be challenged on appeal. Only errors in process or law can be appealed. The evidence would then be officially on record unopposed as fact. Obama would likely not take the case to Federal Court but would let it stand as an ‘only in Georgia’ ruling, because if it went up to the Federal Appeals Court and he loses, it would become a precedent in states beyond Georgia. Also, he would have little basis for his appeal, as he could not challenge the judge’s ruling on the evidence – only that the court did not have jurisdiction to rule.

      On the other hand, a default judgement would be appealed based on judicial error, ignoring completely the evidence. A higher court could, and probably would, stay the order and we would start through the extensive appeals process. Obama could just delay until after the election, and the case would be dismissed as ‘not ripe.’ In that situation none of the evidence would exist as fact.

  3. Leave that SOB off the ballot in 10 or 15 states, and we’ll see if that gets anyone’s attention.

  4. texan59 says:

    I’m going to Costco this weekend. Who needs foil? :D

    I see dear leader putting the muscle on this AFTER the Judge issues his ruling. It will be very quietly done as they don’t really want this to reach the lsm. We shall see.

    • zmalfoy says:

      I’d take you up, except me and Mom are heading out to BJ’s this evening, and I’ve got a coupon. Totally stocking up on foil, eggs (used my last this morning) and a run by the candy store to replenish my supply of vodka. . .

    • Brooklyn says:

      We have most of the judge’s next a kin already in a safe house, north of the Mason Dixon, and are awaiting his arrival immediately after issuing his ruling, with the SOS expected soon thereafter. :)

  5. ZurichMike says:

    Paraphrasing a breathy Julia Sugarbaker might have said: “And that. Is the night. The lights. Went out. In Georgia.”

  6. tnwahm says:

    Now we see why Pantsuits is leaving.

    • I’ve been saying for a while that we need to be prepared for Hillary to be the Democratic nominee. It still could be Obama, but we also need to be prepared for it to be Hillary.

      • barnslayer says:

        That’s what bothers me about all this. The female centaur will be more difficult to vanquish in November.

      • She got my vote in the primary,but she’ll never get it again since i see how dirty the demoncratic party is!! They were all in on allowing an ineligible candidate on the ballot. We need RULES ,an independant party to vet candidates for the office of President and VP.

      • barnslayer says:

        Speaking of Hillary being ineligible… I know a furnishings contractor that worked on the Clinton home before her election to the Senate. He has eyeball proof that they definitely did not live in that house by the deadline needed for her to run for the NY office. She lied.

  7. Avram says:

    Where are the relevant committee’s of the House of Representatives? If the Republicans in Congress don’t act, they render themselves complicit? What do Romney, Gingrich et. al. have to say about this? It’s a little bit early at this point, but at some point, they will have to, particularly if DearLeader is judged to be ineligible?

    • Sharon says:

      Oh, hadn’t you heard? Congress isn’t concerned. And yes, they certainly do render themselves complicit. (Come to think of it–I can think of how I’d like to render them…) But everything Dear Leader has done to obfuscate, lie and whatnot about who he is and how he hates this country is ok with Congress. I have to assume. Since they’re not saying much to indicate otherwise. (They certainly act frustrated from time to time in order to look like they care, but that is NOT the same as saying what is so.) Generally speaking, it’s all good as far as they’re concerned.

  8. Thank you, Menagerie for providing us with this record of the historic day yesterday. I have 3 things to add:

    1. Dr. Orly Taitz is a very patient woman, who’s been at this a long time, and thank God for that.
    2. While this was going on, Darth Obama flew into the ANG base just a few miles from me in Colorado, and I swear that I could actually feel the disturbance in the force.
    3. The constitutional lawyer and pundit, whose name rhymes with Jan Moulter, has been so against this questioning of eligibility, so passionately, for so long, it makes me truly wonder what is really wrong with her. As a knowledgeable lawyer, she knows more than anyone that his clear legal illegibility in this case is important to the rule of law, and to the country. Tin foil or no tin foil, I think she’s a filthy, traitorous rat. Ima have to burn my copies of her books now.

    • Menagerie says:

      I do not have any copies of her books. For some reason I could never put my finger on, I never liked nor trusted her,

      • You’re better than me, Menage. I admired her for a long time, but I was a little uneasy about a few things I thought were minor. But now, I think SD has the right idea about destroying the evidence. “Hey Ann! Good thing you wear sleeveless dresses on these cover photos, ’cause it’s getting warm!”

    • freedom1781 says:

      “While this was going on, Darth Obama flew into the ANG base just a few miles from me in Colorado, and I swear that I could actually feel the disturbance in the force.”

      When Obambi was visiting Langley in October, Air Force One was wasting fuel flying around the area. Hubby and I were shopping and lo and behold, AF1 flew too close over the shopping center. I swear that bugger was following us, ’cause when we got home AF1 was flying over my neighborhood. I stood in the middle of my front yard yelling at that damn plane. I wonder if anyone on that plane could read lips; they would not be too happy with what I was yelling! :)

  9. DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!!! THANKS!! THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS POST THAT WOULD JUSTIFY CENSORING IT!!

    The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a “natural born citizen” according to the Constitution of the USA. The term “natural born citizen” has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
    1) Obama must be born in the USA.
    Obama’s long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!
    —See evidence that Obama forged the birth certificate that was posted on the White House servers on 27 April 2011 (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684
    —See evidence that Obama is using a Social Security Number (SSN) 042-68-4425 that was not legally issued to him but to someone else (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742
    —Just type the keywords Obama long form birth certificate forgery in http://www.google.com and you will find many articles that thoroughly explain why Obama’s long form birth certificate is simply a forgery!!!
    —Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii and to check directly the original long form birth certificate and in particular to assess if even this original is genuine that is if it is not also a forgery to cover up for the possible fact that Obama was never born in Hawaii!!
    2) Obama’s parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
    We know that Obama’s father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
    Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!

    More, Obama is a former lawyer. Therefore, he knew perfectly well that he was not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA but he nevertheless did it DISHONESTLY, FRAUDULENTLY, deceiving purposefully the entire American people.

    Furthermore, Obama was confronted with the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain’s eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a “natural born citizen” according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
    Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.

    First Conclusion:
    —Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
    —Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
    —THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
    1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
    2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
    3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
    ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!

    If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a “natural born citizen” truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s web site “Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers” at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
    In particular, read:
    —“The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth” at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html

    Second conclusion:
    —If you are a rational person, no matter your political affiliation, you surely will be forced to conclude that the facts speak for themselves and that there is no doubt legally that a “natural born citizen” indeed requires that the President of the USA has to have two parents that were BOTH American citizens at the time of Obama’s birth.
    —The Constitution of the USA is sacred to any American citizen AND it applies to every single American citizen, no matter one’s political affiliation, no matter one’s color of the skin, no matter what!!!!
    Therefore, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF LAW LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!) AND IN PARTICULAR OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!)!!!!
    —You now have the facts fully on the table concerning what a “natural born citizen” truly is, you cannot evade the truth about these facts!!!
    Now, what path are you going to choose?
    1) Keep Lying and hiding the facts, hoping that they will disappear by themselves!! Or
    2) Choose to acknowledge these facts fully and be determined to fight for the truth?
    The choice is yours! But the Constitution of the USA is at stake!!!

  10. Coyote says:

    Sweet.
    I’m going to crack a beer and watch the fur and feathers fly on this fight.
    This one is going to be good.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s