Will Obama Try to Circumvent the “War Powers Act” and Stay Engaged in Libya?

I would’nt put anything past this crew..…  WASHINGTON — President Obama and his legal advisers are deliberating about how the United States military may lawfully continue participating in NATO’s bombing campaign in Libya after next week, when the air war will reach a legal deadline for terminating combat operations that have not been authorized by Congress.   Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a president must terminate such operations 60 days after he has formally notified lawmakers about the introduction of armed forces into actual or imminent hostilities. The Libya campaign will reach that mark on May 20.

Though Congressional leaders have shown little interest in enforcing the resolution, James Steinberg, the deputy secretary of state, was asked Thursday about the deadline at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.

He said the administration was examining the military’s “role and activities as we move through the next period of time” and would consult Congress about evaluating “what we think we can and can’t do.”

“Mindful of the passage of time including the end of the two-month period, we are in the process of reviewing our role, and the president will be making decisions going forward in terms of what he sees as appropriate for us to do,” Mr. Steinberg said.

The administration apparently has no intention of pulling out of the Libya campaign, and Mr. Steinberg said that Mr. Obama was committed “to act consistently with the War Powers Resolution.” So the Obama legal team is now trying to come up with a plausible theory for why continued participation by the United States does not violate the law.

A variety of Pentagon and military officials said the issue was in the hands of lawyers, not commanders. Several officials described a few of the ideas under consideration. [...]  While many presidents of both parties have deployed forces into hostilities without prior Congressional permission, there is far less precedent for defying the section of the War Powers Resolution that imposes the 60-day deadline on hostilities. For the most part, the issue has not arisen because fighting was over by then, or Congress voted to continue an operation.

One event that set off a legal controversy came in 1999, when President Bill Clinton continued the bombing campaign in Kosovo more than two weeks after the deadline. But the Clinton legal team argued that Congress had implicitly authorized the operation to continue by appropriating specific funds for it.

That option is not available to Mr. Obama. This year, the Senate passed a resolution calling on the United Nations Security Council to impose a no-fly zone on Libya. But Congress has neither approved nor specifically financed United States participation in enforcing the zone, and the House of Representatives is in recess next week.  (read more)

About these ads
This entry was posted in Egypt & Libya Part 2. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Will Obama Try to Circumvent the “War Powers Act” and Stay Engaged in Libya?

  1. tnwahm says:

    Since when did the question of legality every stop BO/BS?

  2. Sharon says:

    There are three distinct (and mutually exclusive) reference points/criteria set forth in the piece:

    1. ” …how the United States military may lawfully continue…”
    2. “…. evaluating ‘what we think we can and can’t do.’ ”
    3. “the president will be making decisions going forward in terms of what he sees as appropriate for us to do….”

    Meaningful triangulation of lawful options, White House groupthink and what obama “thinks is appropriate” is not SOP. This piece describes what normal Americans would define as keeping your options pen, telling the teacher what you think the teacher wants to hear and then doing exactly what you feel like doing when the time comes.

    They will draw from the same principles they have used in refusing to issue oil permits to Louisiana and disaster declarations to Texas. The only difference is that Steinberg is trying to make it look like a thoughtful process. Different bucket: same slop.

    Abiding by the law is not important to this administration, so “trying to come up with a plausible theory for why continued participation by the United States does not violate the law” is surely an uncomfortable exercise for them. A serial murderer in a last-stand gunfight usually doesn’t send notes to the SWAT team asking them to verify that his weapons are properly registered.

    • stellap says:

      Excellent analysis, Sharon!

      Good to see you; how are things?

      • Sharon says:

        Pretty good…the basement finally started drying up a few days ago, so now we can get at all the things that were basically just “stacked to the ceiling” down there….that will make the house-selling projects easier to pursue. We rented a storage space yesterday and started moving heavy winter equipment there, to get it out of the way…which will make the cutting-apart-the-fallen-down-garage project easier for DH.

        • WeeWeed says:

          Mornin,’ Sharon! Good to see you! Sounds like you two have a lot of hard, heavy manual labor to go, still.

        • stellap says:

          I should follow your example by cleaning out my basement! Let’s just say that I wouldn’t freely show it on a house tour.

  3. Pingback: The 20 Most Disgusting Things from Barack Obama « Off-Grid Blogger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s